Rubric for Evaluating Group Activity

Group Name

Criteria

Oral
Presentation

Evaluator

Very Good

Good

Fair

Poor

10

The presenter
presents logical
and interesting
sequence which
the audience can
follow. He/she
demonstrates
full knowledge
(more than
required) by
answering all
class questions
with
explanations and
elaboration.
He/she uses
clear voice and
correct, precise
pronunciation of
terms. He/she
maintains eye
contact with
audience and
seldom returns
to notes.

The presenter
presents
information in
logical
sequence which
the audience
can follow.
He/she is at
ease and
answers most
questions with
explanations
and some
elaboration.
His/her voice is
clear and
pronounces
most of the
words
correctly. Most
audience
members can
hear the
presentation.
He/she
maintains eye
contact with
audience,
seldom
returning to
his/her notes.

Audience has
difficulty
following the
presentation
because the
presenter
jumps around.
He/she is not
comfortable
with the
information
and is able to
answer only
rudimentary
questions, but
fails to
elaborate.
His/her voice
is low and
incorrectly
pronounces
terms making
it difficult for
the audience to
understand the
presentation.
He/she
occasionally
uses eye
contact, but
still reads
mostly from
his/her notes.

Audience
cannot
understand
the
presentation
because
there is no
sequence of
information.
He/she does
not have
grasp of
information;
he/she
cannot
answer
questions
about the
subject.
He/she
mumbles,
incorrectly
pronounces
terms, and
speaks too
softly for the
audience to
hear. He/she
makes no
eye contact
and only
reads from
his/her

Score

Interpretation

Collaboration

notes.
The
interpretatio
n is vague.
No
meaningful
inferences
and
conclusions
can be
drawn.
The result of the The result of the The result of
The result of
task documents
task documents
the task
the task
how
members
division of
documents that documents
divided tasks,
responsibilities
only few
that one
assigned
roles
and describes
members are
student is
based on the
how the
doing the
doing most
skills/ talents of
individual
work. It shows of the work.
individual
efforts
evidence of
It shows
members.
capitalized the
poor
evidence of
However, it
strengths of each shows evidence
communicatio poor
team member. It of poor
n unresolved
communicati
shows evidence communication, conflict, or
on,
unresolved
of good
failure to
unresolved
conflict,
or
communication,
collaborate on conflict, or
failure to
resolved
important
failure to
collaborate
on
conflict, or sense
aspects of the
collaborate
important aspects
of collaboration
work.
on important
of the work.
on important
aspects of
aspects of the
the work.
work.
The
interpretation is
clear. It provides
meaningful
inferences and
draw original
conclusions.

The
interpretation is
clear. It
provides
reliable
inferences and
conclusions.

The
interpretation
is vague. It
does not
provide
meaningful
inferences and
conclusions.

TOTAL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------______/30

Comments and Suggestions