Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
RESTRUCTURING
CORPORATE
RESTRUCTURING
direction. Here are some examples of why corporate restructuring may take place and what it can mean for the
company. Restructuring a corporate entity is often a necessity when the company has grown to the point that the
original structure can no longer efficiently manage the output and general interests of the company. For example, a
corporate restructuring may call for spinning off some departments into subsidiaries as a means of creating a more
effective management model as well as taking advantage of tax breaks that would allow the corporation to divert
more revenue to the production process. In this scenario, the restructuring is seen as a positive sign of growth of the
company and is often welcome by those who wish to see the corporation gain a larger market share. Corporate
restructuring may also take place as a result of the acquisition of the company by new owners. The acquisition may
be in the form of a leveraged buyout, a hostile takeover, or a merger of some type that keeps the company intact as a
subsidiary of the controlling corporation. When the restructuring is due to a hostile takeover, corporate raiders often
implement a dismantling of the company, selling off properties and other assets in order to make a profit from the
buyout. What remains after this restructuring maybe a smaller entity that can continue to function, albeit not at the
level possible before the takeover took place In general, the idea of corporate restructuring is to allow the company
to continue functioning in some manner. Even when corporate raiders break up.
Corporate restructuring is one of the means that can be employed to meet the challenges which confront business.
Corporate restructuring involves restructuring the assets and liabilities of corporations, including their debt-to-equity
structures, in line with their cash flow needs in order to,
Promote efficiency,
Restore growth.
CORPORATE
RESTRUCTURING
business tend to be a drain on the corporate profits and corporate resources. Corporations may restructure in order to
put their best resources into the parts of the business that make money and sell off or liquidate parts that don't.
2. Eradicating Debt
Many corporations have debt that threaten the viability of the business because the stock fell, the price of materials
rose or consumer demand faltered. These corporations must restructure in order to pay the debts. This often includes
employee layoffs, the selling of assets and a reduction in benefits for employees who remain. The objective of this
kind of corporate restructuring is to rope the debt to equity ratio back to a number where the corporation can survive.
3. Responding to Changing Trends
Frequently a corporation's business model is based on a trend that has changed.For example, a construction company
may have to alter its business model to creating or retrofitting buildings according to LEED standards. Likewise, a
company whose business centered on telephones and faxes has to face the change in how the world communicates.
These changes often require corporate restructuring, selling old assets to buy new and putting people who understand
the new trends and technologies over those who have worked their way up in the old system.
4. Meeting Regulatory Change
Regulatory changes create a need for corporate restructuring. The deregulation of the banking industry, for example,
meant banks could suddenly sell products such as insurance and could operate across state lines. This required a
restructuring along with many mergers and acquisitions. Regulatory changes resulting from the financial crisis of
2009 are leading to other corporations' restructuring their businesses, particularly in financial services such banks,
mortgage companies and credit cards.
CORPORATE
RESTRUCTURING
CORPORATE
RESTRUCTURING
Any business restructuring plan needs to examine where you can cut costs in terms of personnel. Sometimes, this can
be the hardest decision to make, but if a company is to survive, it must use every cent to its fullest potential. If two
workers are doing the job of one, someone needs to go. If there are multiple locations to restructure, the plan should
include the parent company. This can mean letting people go from the executive level, where there are larger salaries
and the more costly retirement packages.
4. Future
Your business restructuring plan needs to look to the future. This means putting core policies in place geared toward
survival and growth. To arrive at the restructuring necessary, the business needs to operate at the most efficient level
possible. This might include incorporating new technologies that can eliminate redundant task processing.
5. Government
Just as businesses restructure, governments can do the same. Governments will often attack a fiscal problem by
going down the path of restructuring, and the same basic principles apply. Businesses and governments both need to
include fiscal responsibilities within the plans, as well as an examination of the entire organizational structure,
determining what you can eliminate or consolidate.
CORPORATE
RESTRUCTURING
CORPORATE
RESTRUCTURING
Joint ventures
2.
3.
Divestitures
7
CORPORATE
RESTRUCTURING
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
1. Joint Ventures
Joint ventures are new enterprises owned by two or more participants. They are typically formed for special purposes
for a limited duration. It is a combination of subsets of assets contributed by two (or more) business entities for a
specific business purpose and a limited duration. Each of the venture partners continues to exist as a separate firm,
and the joint venture represents a new business enterprise. It is a contract to work together for a period of time each
participant expects to gain from the activity but also must make a contribution.
CORPORATE
RESTRUCTURING
2. Spin-off
Spinoffs are a way to get rid of underperforming or non-core business divisions that can drag down profits.
Process of spin-off
1.
2.
The parent company files the necessary paperwork with the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI).
3.
The spinoff becomes a company of its own and must also file paperwork with the SEBI.
4.
5.
Sell-off:
Selling a part or all of the firm by any one of means: sale, liquidation, spin-off & so on. or General term for
divestiture of part/all of a firm by any one of a no. of means: sale, liquidation, spin-off and so on.
3.Divestures
Divesture is a transaction through which a firm sells a portion of its assets or a division to another company. It
involves selling some of the assets or division for cash or securities to a third party which is an outsider.
Divestiture is a form of contraction for the selling company. means of expansion for the purchasing company. It
represents the sale of a segment of a company (assets, a product line, a subsidiary) to a third party for cash and or
securities.
Mergers, assets purchase and takeovers lead to expansion in some way or the other. They are based on the principle
of synergy which says 2 + 2 = 5! , divestiture on the other hand is based on the principle of anergy which says 5
3 = 3!.
CORPORATE
RESTRUCTURING
Among the various methods of divestiture, the most important ones are partial sell-off, demerger (spin-off & split
off) and equity carve out. Some scholars define divestiture rather narrowly as partial sell off and some scholars
define divestiture more broadly to include partial sell offs, demergers and so on.
4. Equity Carve-Out
A transaction in which a parent firm offers some of a subsidiaries common stock to the general public, to bring in a
cash infusion to the parent without loss of control.
In other words equity carve outs are those in which some of a subsidiaries shares are offered for a sale to the general
public, bringing an infusion of cash to the parent firm without loss of control. Equity carve out is also a means of
reducing their exposure to a riskier line of business and to boost shareholders value.
Features
It is the sale of a minority or majority voting control in a subsidiary by its parents to outsider investors. These
are also referred to as split-off IPOs
The equity holders in the new entity need not be the same as the equity holders in the original seller.
5. Leveraged Buyout
A buyout is a transaction in which a person, group of people, or organization buys a company or a controlling share
in the stock of a company. Buyouts great and small occur all over the world on a daily basis.
Buyouts can also be negotiated with people or companies on the outside. For example, a large candy company might
buy out smaller candy companies with the goal of cornering the market more effectively and purchasing new brands
which it can use to increase its customer base. Likewise, a company which makes widgets might decide to buy a
company which makes thingamabobs in order to expand its operations, using an establishing company as a base
rather than trying to start from scratch.
Features of Leveraged Buyout
CORPORATE
RESTRUCTURING
Hard assets (property, plant and equipment, inventory, receivables) that may be used as collateral for lower
cost secured debt;
The potential for new management to make operational or other improvements to the firm to boost cash
flows;
Market conditions and perceptions that depress the valuation or stock price.
6. Management buyout
In this case, management of the company buys the company, and they may be joined by employees in the venture.
This practice is sometimes questioned because management can have unfair advantages in negotiations, and could
potentially manipulate the value of the company in order to bring down the purchase price for themselves. On the
other hand, for employees and management, the possibility of being able to buy out their employers in the future
may serve as an incentive to make the company strong.
It occurs when a companys managers buy or acquire a large part of the company. The goal of an MBO may be to
strengthen the managers interest in the success of the company.
Purpose of Management buyouts
From management point of view may be:
To save their jobs, either if the business has been scheduled for closure or if an outside purchaser would bring
in its own management team.
To maximize the financial benefits they receive from the success they bring to the company by taking the
profits for themselves.
The goal of an MBO may be to strengthen the managers interest in the success of the company. Key considerations
in MBO are fairness to shareholders price, the future business plan, and legal and tax issues.
7. Master Limited Partnership
Master Limited Partnerships are a type of limited partnership in which the shares are publicly traded. The limited
partnership interests are divided into units which are traded as shares of common stock. Shares of ownership are
referred to as units.
11
CORPORATE
RESTRUCTURING
MLPs generally operate in the natural resource (petroleum and natural gas extraction and transportation), financial
services, and real estate industries.
The advantage of a Master Limited Partnership is it combines the tax benefits of a limited partnership (the
partnership does not pay taxes from the profit the money is only taxed when unit holders receive distributions) with
the liquidity of a publicly traded company.
8. Employees Stock Option Plan (ESOP)
An Employee Stock Option is a type of defined contribution benefit plan that buys and holds stock. ESOP is a
qualified, defined contribution, employee benefit plan designed to invest primarily in the stock of the sponsoring
employer. Employee Stock Options are qualified in the sense that the ESOPs sponsoring company, the selling
shareholder and participants receive various tax benefits. With an ESOP, employees never buy or hold the stock
directly.
CORPORATE
RESTRUCTURING
protection of assets (it is not possible for the creditors to proceed with the execution of lien, distraint and
legal proceedings are suspended and subsequently stopped)
the inability to count old liabilities with new liabilities that arose after the beginning of the restructuring
process (the company does not carry out old obligations after the beginning of restructuring; others have to
carry out obligations towards the restructured company)
relative and gradual satisfaction of creditors (distribution of liabilities over a longer period of time)
During the restructuring process, the administrator approves the debtor's legal actions (with the exception
of common legal actions)
13
CORPORATE
RESTRUCTURING
In case the restructuring plan is not approved, the company is declared bankrupt (There is a possibility to
replace a group disapproval with the restructuring plan with a court decree)
In case the plan towards the creditor is not being fulfilled (even after additional appeal) the plan becomes
legally unenforceable towards this creditor
1. To improve the countrys Balance sheet ,(by selling unprofitable division from its core business)
2. To accomplish staff reduction (by selling/ closing of unprofitable portion)
14
CORPORATE
RESTRUCTURING
CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING
15
CORPORATE
RESTRUCTURING
EXPANSION
Mergers &
Acquisitions
Tender Offers
SELL OFFs
Spin-Off
Split- Off
Equity Crave -Out
Joint Ventures
CORPORATE
CONTROL
CHANGE IN
OWNERSHIP
Exchange Offer
Share Repurchase
Standstill Agreements
Going Private
Expansion: Expansions may include mergers, acquisitions, tender offers and joint ventures. Mergers per se, may
either be horizontal mergers, vertical mergers or conglomerate mergers. In a tender offer, the acquiring firm seeks
controlling interest in the firm to be acquired and requests the shareholders of the firm to be acquired, to tender their
shares or stock to it. Joint ventures involve only a small part of the activities of the companies involved.
Sell-Off: Sell-Off may either be through a spin-off or divestiture. Spin-Off creates a new entity with shares being
distributed on a pro rata basis to existing shareholders of the parent company. Split-Off is a variation of Sell-Off.
Divestiture involves sale of a portion of a firm/company to a third party.
Corporate Control: Corporate control includes buy-backs and greenmail where the management of the firm wishes
to have complete control and ownership.
Change in Ownership: Change in ownership may either be through an exchange offer, share repurchase or going
public.
An example: Cesar Steel Announces Restructuring Plans
16
CORPORATE
RESTRUCTURING
Cesar Steel Limited recently announced its restructuring plan through which the company plans to reduce its interest
burden. The company has also initiated several other steps including increasing production and lowering operating
costs as a part of its restructuring program. The company also announced the development of a strategy addressing
its debt burden-reduction and lengthening the maturity period.
Other restructuring programs initiated by the company included:
The company, subsequent to its restructuring program, expects to be in a position to make net profits, declare
dividends and enhance shareholder value.
CORPORATE
RESTRUCTURING
schemes, bank recapitalization, asset management companies, and the appointment of directors to lead
the restructuring. After achieving its goals, the government must cut back its intervention in support of
restructuring.
Tasks of Restructuring
Corporate restructuring on a large scale is usually made necessary by a systemic financial crisis
defined as a severe disruption of financial markets that, by impairing their ability to function, has large
and adverse effects on the economy. The intertwining of the corporate and financial sectors that defines
a systemic crisis requires that the restructuring address both sectors together.
CORPORATE
RESTRUCTURING
The continuous innovations in technology, product, work processes, materials, organizational culture and
structure
Various actions of work force values, global competitors, demands and diversity
CORPORATE
RESTRUCTURING
of the business.
The perspective of organizational restructuring may be different for the employees. When a company goes for the
organizational restructuring, it often leads to reducing the manpower and hence meaning that people are losing their
jobs. This may decrease the morale of employee in a large manner. Hence many firms provide strategies on career
transitioning and outplacement support to their existing employees for an easy transition to their next job.
Even after the foundation has been laid, corporate restructuring cannot begin to make headway without
substantial progress in restructuring the financial sector. The draining of bank capital as part of the crisis
will usually lead to a sharp cutback in lending to viable and nonviable corporations alike, worsening the
overall contraction. Moreover, banks must have the capital and incentives to play a role in restructuring.
The first task of financial restructuring is to separate out the viable from the nonviable financial
institutions to the extent possible. To do this work, financing and technical assistance from international
financial institutions can be helpful, as in Indonesia following the 1997 crisis.
Nonviable banks should be taken over by the government and their assets eventually sold or shifted to
an asset management corporation, while viable banks should be recapitalized. Banks should be directly
20
CORPORATE
RESTRUCTURING
recapitalized for normal operation or else, in the absence of strong competitive pressures, they may
impede recovery by recapitalizing themselves indirectly through wide interest rate spreads. At the same
time the government should ensure that bank regulation and supervision is strong enough to maintain a
stable banking sector.
There is a degree of circularity here in that the separation of viable from nonviable banks is helped by
completion of the same task for corporations, which itself is aided by financial restructuring. The best
way to close this circle seems to be rapid restructuring of the banks because a cutback in bank financing
to corporations amplifies the overall contraction, and has irreversible consequencessuch as the sale of
assets too cheaply.
RESTRUCTURING THE CORPORATE SECTOR
Corporate restructuring can begin in earnest only when banks and market players are willing and able to
participate. As with the financial sector, the first task is distinguishing viable from nonviable
corporations. Nonviable corporations are those whose liquidation value is greater than their value as a
going concern, taking into account potential restructuring costs, the "equilibrium" exchange rate, and
interest rates. The closure of nonviable firms ensures that they do not absorb credit or worsen bank
losses. However, the identification of nonviable corporations is complicated by the poor overall
performance of the corporate sector during and just after the crisis. Viable and nonviable firms can be
identified using profit simulations and balance sheet projections, as well as best judgment.
Liquidating nonviable corporations during a systemic crisis usually requires the establishment of new
liquidation mechanisms that bypass standard court-based bankruptcy procedures. The bankruptcy code
of the United States can be taken as the standard minimal government involvement approach. In
practice, however, this code has a strong liquidation biassome 90 percent of cases end in liquidation,
and reorganization takes a long time. Moreover, courts are usually unable to handle a large volume of
cases, lack expertise, and may be subject to the influence of vested interests. Giving debtors protection
from bankruptcy during mediation proceedings allows corporations that are later judged to be viable to
remain operating and enables the orderly liquidation of nonviable corporations. If debtors are protected
from bankruptcy, however, monitoring of the corporations is needed to ensure that incumbent managers
21
CORPORATE
RESTRUCTURING
do not hive off the most profitable assets. Liquidation can be speeded up by special courts or new
bankruptcy laws. Hungary introduced a tough bankruptcy law in 1991 under which firms in arrears
were required to submit reorganization plans to creditors; if agreement was not reached, firms were
liquidated. Also, a standstill on payments to banks during negotiations allows cash-strapped
corporations to continue operation while their viability is being decided. Without effective bankruptcy
procedures, restructuring can be significantly slowed down, as happened in many of the transition
countries, in Mexico in 1995, and especially in Indonesia after the 1997 Asian crisis.
The government must also decide on disposal of the assets of liquidated corporations. Delays in asset
disposal tie up economic resources, slow economic recovery, and impede corporate restructuring.
Of course, the balance sheets of viable corporations must be restructured. Restructuring will involve
private domestic and foreign creditors, newly state-owned creditors, and asset management
corporations, as well as stakeholders such as unions and governments. Usually, balance sheet
restructuring takes place through the reduction of debt or through the conversion of debt into equity.
Often minority creditors slow debt restructuring by threatening to liquidate the debtor in an attempt to
force majority creditors to buy them out on favorable terms. This coordination problem can be avoided
by rules that allow less-than-unanimous creditor approval of reorganization plans, which can be
enforced by government moral suasion, by prior creditor agreement to a set of principles, or through
bankruptcy proceedings.
Early completion of relatively clear-cut transactions can jump-start the restructuring program.
Restructuring is often delayed by difficulties in valuing transactions because of economic instability and
unreliable corporate data.
Long delays in implementing bankruptcy reforms greatly slowed the large-scale corporate restructuring
efforts of the mid- and late 1990s. By early 2000, Mexico had still not completed bankruptcy law
reform, even though there had been a sharp drop in bank claims on the private sector since the country's
1995 crisis. In East Asia, ineffectual bankruptcy laws stymied corporate restructuring by allowing
nonviable firms to stay afloat, which not only precluded banks from collecting the underlying collateral,
22
CORPORATE
RESTRUCTURING
but also acted as a disincentive for viable firms to repay their debtfurther hurting the banks. Delays in
bankruptcy reform are due mainly to pressures from groups and individuals who would be hurt by the
liquidation of nonviable firms, as well as by the time needed to bring up to speed legal systems faced
with a sudden increase in bankruptcy cases.
Transparency is one positive suggestion for bankruptcy reform: regular government disclosure of all the
aspects of restructuring can make clear the impediments put in the way by vested interest groups, and
thus lead to public pressure to accelerate reform.
CORPORATE
RESTRUCTURING
downsizing-induced restructuring leads to a flatter organizational structure, and broader job descriptions and duties.
New Work Methods
Traditional organizational systems and controls cater to standard 9 AM to 5 PM office or factory based work. Newer
methods of work, especially outsourcing, telecommuting, and flex time require new systems, policies, and structures
in place, besides a change in culture, and such requirements may trigger organizational restructuring.
The presence of telecommuting employees, temporary employees, and outsourcing work may require a drastic
overhaul of performance management parameters, compensation and benefits administration, and other vital
systems. The newer work methods may, for instance, require placing emphasis on the results rather than the methods,
flexible reporting relationships, and a strong communication policy.
New Management Methods
Traditional management science recommends highly centralized operations, and the top management adopting a
command and control style. The new behavioral approach to management considers human resources a key driver of
strategic advantage, and focuses on empowering the workforce and providing considerate leeway to line managers in
conducting day-to-day operations. The top management intervenes only to set strategy and ensure compliance;
strategic business units receive autonomy in functioning.
Traditional management structures were bureaucratic and hierarchical. Of late, management experts see wisdom in
flatter organizations with wider roles and responsibilities for each member of the team. Job flexibility, enlargement
and enrichment are key features of such new structures, but successful implementation requires changes in the
communication and reporting structures of the organization. While new organizations can start with such new
paradigms, old organizations have to restructure themselves to keep up with these best practices to remain
competitive.
Quality Management
Competitive pressures force most companies to have a serious look at the quality of their products and services, and
adopt quality interventions such as Six Sigma and Total Quality Management. Implementing new quality standards
may require changes in the organization. Most of the new quality applications strive to imbibe quality in the actual
work process rather than maintain a separate quality control department to accept or reject output based on quality
specifications.
In many cases, an organizational level audit precedes quality interventions, and such audits highlight inefficiencies in
the organizational structure that may impede quality in the first place. For instance, reducing waste may require
eliminating certain processes,
24
CORPORATE
RESTRUCTURING
Technology
Innovations in technology, work processes, materials and other factors that influence the business, may require
restructuring to keep up with the times. For instance, enterprise resource planning that links all systems and
procedures of an organizational by leveraging the power of information technology may initially require a complete
overhaul of the systems and procedures first.
Such technology-centric change may be part of a business process engineering exercise that involves redesigning the
business processes to maximize potential and value added, while minimizing everything else. Failure to do so may
result in the company systems and procedures turning obsolete and discordant with the times.
Mergers and Acquisitions
In todays corporate world, where survival of the fittest is the maxim, mergers and acquisitions are commonplace and
any merger or acquisition invariably heralds a restructuring exercise. The reasons for such restructuring
accompanying mergers and acquisitions are many. Some of the common reasons are:
Reconciling the systems and procedures of the merged organizations to ensure that the new entity has consistency of
approach.
Eliminating duplication of work or systems, such as two human resource or finance departments.
Incorporating the preferences of the new owners, and more.
Joint ventures may also require formation of matrix teams, special task forces, or a new subsidiary.
Finance Related Issues
Very often, small and medium scale businesses have informal structures and reporting relationships, and an ad-hoc
style of decision-making. When such companies grow and want to raise fresh funds, venture capitalists and
regulations might demand a more professional set up, with formal written-down structures and policies. A listed
company may undertake a restructuring exercise to improve its efficiency and unlock hidden value, and thereby
show more profits to attract fresh investors.
Bankruptcy may force the business to shed excess flab such as workforce, land, or other resources, sell some
business lines to raise cash, and become lean and mean, to attract bail-outs or some other rescue package. Companies
may try to restructure out of court to avoid the high costs of a formal bankruptcy.
Induce Higher Earnings
25
CORPORATE
RESTRUCTURING
The two basic goals of corporate restructuring may include higher earnings and the creation of corporate value.
Creation of corporate value largely depends on the firms ability to generate enough cash.
Divestiture and Networking
Companies, while keeping in view their core competencies, should exit from peripherals. This can be realized
through entering into joint ventures, strategic alliances and agreements.
Provide Proactive Leadership
Management style greatly influences the restructuring process. All successful companies have clearly displayed
leadership styles in which managers relate on a one-to-one basis with their employees.
Empowerment
Empowerment is a major constituent of any restructuring process. Delegation and decentralized decision making
provides companies with effective management information system.
Reengineering Process
Success in a restructuring process is only possible through improving various processes and aligning resources of the
company. Redesigning a business process should be the highest priority in a corporate restructuring exercise.
26
CORPORATE
RESTRUCTURING
Corporate restructuring occurs based on the needs of the company. Internal restructuring typically occurs as a result
of business analysis that shows a need for greater efficiency in the way business departments communicate and
complete tasks. Sometimes a particular segment of the business will start to fail, and the company will need to
reallocate resources in order to support it. Sometimes a business may have expanded to much, and needs to refocus
on its core abilities. At other times a business may need to restructure its financial position in order to continue
making profits. Often, restructuring plans are necessary simply to meet the constantly change demands of technology
that competitors are embracing. Not all reasons for restructuring are negative, and many benefit employees as well as
executives in the company.
Financial Restructuring
Financial restructuring deals with all changes the businesses makes to its debts and equity, including mergers,
acquisitions, joint ventures and other deals. Generally these occur when a company joins or is bought by another
company. Ownerships of the company, or at least some interest in the company, is transferred to another organization
or group of investors. Actual business practices may remain unchanged.
Technological Restructuring
Technological restructuring occurs when a new technology has been developed that changes the way an industry
operates. This type of restructuring usually affects employees, and tends to lead to new training initiatives, along
with some layoffs as the company improves efficiency. This type of restructuring also involves alliances with third
parties that have technical knowledge or resources.
Restructuring Methods
Restructuring methods are typically divided into expansion, refocusing, corporate control, and ownership structure.
The last two, corporate control and ownership structure, apply mostly to financial changes and affect ownership.
Corporate control, for instance, is a method where the company buys back enough shares to be able to make its own
decisions again. Expansion occurs with acquisition, mergers, or joint ventures. Refocusing can take many forms,
including business splits, sell offs of certain ventures, and general consolidation practices.
27
CORPORATE
RESTRUCTURING
CORPORATE
RESTRUCTURING
business decisions resulting from corporation restructuring. Department sizes many shrink, causing employee
layoffs along with pay cuts for managers. Departments may also merge with other departments in a corporation
as a result of the restructuring. Managers must understand how the corporation's new leadership structure
operates in order to ensure that productivity stays at a high level.
29
CORPORATE
RESTRUCTURING
Effects on Investors
Corporate restructuring makes investors nervous. This can cause a stock sell-off that decreases the overall value
of the corporation and exacerbates the underlying reason for the restructuring. A corporation undergoing a
restructuring must develop a proactive strategy to communicate to investors all the positives that will come with
reorganization. Investor funds are a key component in the restructuring process. If a corporation loses a large
number of investors, it may experience difficulty raising capital needed to bring its restructuring plan to fruition.
Improving Organizational Direction
A company emerging from a successful restructuring should have an improved organizational direction with
increased focus and streamlined operational costs. The company's new direction should revolve around a set of
specific business goals identified in the very beginning stages of restructuring. Business goals could be as simple
as turning a profit, or as complex as dividing the corporation into several new companies, all with specific
business models and different product offerings.
30
CORPORATE
RESTRUCTURING
Corporate restructuring makes investors nervous. This can cause a stock sell-off that decreases the overall value
of the corporation and exacerbates the underlying reason for the restructuring. A corporation undergoing a
restructuring must develop a proactive strategy to communicate to investors all the positives that will come with
reorganization. Investor funds are a key component in the restructuring process. If a corporation loses a large
number of investors, it may experience difficulty raising capital needed to bring its restructuring plan to fruition.
Improving Organizational Direction
A company emerging from a successful restructuring should have an improved organizational direction with
increased focus and streamlined operational costs. The company's new direction should revolve around a set of
specific business goals identified in the very beginning stages of restructuring. Business goals could be as simple
as turning a profit, or as complex as dividing the corporation into several new companies, all with specific
business models and different product offerings.
17. CONCLUSION
Corporate restructuring on a large scale is potentially one of the most challenging tasks faced by economic
policymakers. The need for large-scale restructuring arises in the aftermath of a financial crisis when corporate
distress is pervasive. The successful completion of restructuring requires a government to take the lead in
establishing restructuring priorities, addressing market failures, reforming the legal and tax systems.
31
CORPORATE
RESTRUCTURING
For instance, in a Banking sector, the best way is to rebuild the financial company around currently profitable and
cash positive business units (like credit cards and short term personal loans), while cutting all the unprofitable units
(like Auto finance or long term business loans).
Some general lessons regarding large-scale corporate restructuring that can be drawn from the experience of the
countries examined in this pamphlet are as follows:
Governments should be prepared to take on a large role as soon as a crisis is judged to be systemic.
Measures should be taken quickly to offset the social costs of crisis and restructuring.
Restructuring should be based on a holistic and transparent strategy encompassing corporate and financial
restructuring.
Restructuring goals should be stated at the outset, and sunset provisions embedded into the enabling
legislation for new restructuring institutions based on these goals.
A determined effort to establish effective bankruptcy procedures in the face of pressures from vested interest
groups is essential.
18. WEBLIOGRAPHY
WEB SITES
www.valueadder.com
www.wisegeek.com
www.equitymaster.com
www.investopedia.com
32
CORPORATE
RESTRUCTURING
33