Instructor: Adriana Todea

atodea@yahoo.com
Office hours: Friday 2-3 p.m., Alpha Centre room

Introduction to Generative Grammar

Course 6: D-structure. S-structure. Movement
WEEK 8
Outline1
Sound, Syntax and Meaning
The sounds are the external face of language the physical form of
speech but they have no meaning in themselves, they are the interface
with the world. Apple means nothing to a Romanian speaker; mr
means nothing to an English speaker.
The meanings are the internal face of language, its contact with the
mind, with cognition: they are abstract mental representations with no
physical form. The issue in linguistics is finding the relationship between
external sounds and internal meanings.
How do we match sounds to meanings?
GG answer: by a computational system called Universal Grammar (UG),
that is, the bridge between phonetic representations and semantic
representations is syntax.
The computational system: --must describe the actual sounds/ their
sequence/ stress patterns/ the intonation (Phonetic Form PF)
--must describe what the sentence actually
means (Logical Form LF)
--must describe the syntactic devices that
connects them (Syntax)
LF interfaces between Syntax and Semantics.
PF interfaces between Syntax and Phonetics.
PF and LF constitute the interface between language and other cognitive
systems, yielding direct representations of sound on the one hand and
meanings on the other as language and other systems interact (N.
Chomsky)
!!!LF is not Semantics. It only refers to the part of semantic
representations which are determined by syntactic structures. LF is in
between Syntax and Semantics!
Syntax is multistratal: layers or levels of syntax.
You find in this outline the content of the slides that I project during the course,
which contain the main topics and also structures and diagrams which may be difficult
and time consuming for you to copy during my lecture. They are made available to you
before class to save time and to make note-taking easier, but not unnecessary!
The outline as such (without your notes covering the detailed explanations that I give
during the course) cannot constitute a sufficient source of information when preparing
for the exam. If you miss the class, it is strongly recommended that this outline be used
as a guide to the bibliography indicated at the end of this document.
1

Cours 6

Page 1

The Faculty of Letters is here. affirmative

The Faculty of Letters is where? interrogative (echo question)
Where is the Faculty of Letters? interrogative
D(deep)-structure (all elements are in their original location, where they
were generated according to the Projection Principle.
Predicates assign theta-roles to their arguments and
adjuncts according to Theta-criterion)
movement
S(surface)-structure (the result of some elements having been moved)
The bridging level between sound and meanings is S-structure.

D-structure (X-bar projection, theta-role assignment)

PF ----------S-structure ----------LF

S-structure is the point of interaction among all these three fundamental

levels. D-structure is related to S-structure by movement. S-structure
indicates the original location of the elements using traces. Traces are
generated by the interaction at S-structure of all three levels: Dstructure, LF and PF.
The principle of Movement:
: the movement operation is an
invariant principle of computation, stating that a category can be moved
to a target position.
Restrictions: categories can be moved only to certain locations, and not
moved more than a certain distance.
is tightly constrained.
NOTE: The term movement can be misleading as it conveys the idea
that something actually moves from one place to another. Instead chains
are being created between the moved element and its trace.
Movement of an element always leaves a trace and, in the simplest
element and t is its trace.
Subject-movement
Subject-movement involves the specifier of a VP moving to the specifier of
IP. It is a spec-to-spec movement.
Course 6

Page 2

Course 6

Page 3

Verb-movement
When the Inflection is a syntactic morpheme:
a) do-support: dummy do is introduced under the I node to provide a
root for the inflectional morpheme;
b) verb movement: head-to-head movement from V to I to provide a root
for the inflectional morpheme.

Verb-movement

Course 6

Page 4

Irregular verbs:

Interrogatives in English:
Affirmative: Miss Marple will write her letters in the garden in the
afternoon.

Course 6

Page 5

Yes/No question: Will Miss Marple write her letters in the garden in the
afternoon?
The interrogative feature triggers IC head-to-head movement, as the
C position is vacant

Course 6

Page 6

The interrogative
* Could you tell me/ I asked him whether will Miss Marple write her
letters in the garden in the afternoon?/.
is ungrammatical because whether occupies the coplementizer (C)
position, and, therefore, the C position is not vacant for the inflection
will to move to.

WH-movement:
The abstract interrogative feature triggers both wh-movement and
head-to-head movement in English.

Course 6

Page 7

Miss Marple will write what in the garden in the afternoon?

What will Miss Marple write in the garden in the afternoon?

Course 6

Page 8

Miss Marple will write her letters where in the afternoon?

Where will Miss Marple write her letters in the afternoon?

Course 6

Page 9

Miss Marple will write her letters in the garden when?

When will Miss Marple write her letters in the garden?

Course 6

Page 10

Wh-movement in relative clauses:

[NPThe student [CPwho [IPthe examiner failed___]]] was Tom.

Course 6

Page 11

[NPThe student [CPthat [IPthe examiner failed___]]] was Tom

Course 6

Page 12

Course 6

Page 13

The sentence
*The student who that the examiner failed was Tom.
is ungrammatical because of The Doubly Filled COMP Filter: The Csystem may not contain both an overt wh-element and an overt
complementizer.
The Doubly Filled COMP Filter is not universal (Dutch, for example, allows
both a wh-word under spec-CP and a complementizer at the same time.
Therefore, The Doubly Filled COMP Filter is not a principle, but a
parameter of UG.

Bibliography:
Vivian Cook & Mark Newson (1996) Chomskys Universal Grammar,
second edition, Blackwell, pp 189-215 (you can find it in the Generative
Grammar dossier at the library)

Course 6

Page 14