Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
DR 1102 (A) (1) James Leuenberger knowingly engaged in unethical and criminal
behavior against the Josephine County Circuit Court, Judge Thomas Hull, Judge
Linda Baker, Judge Daniel Simcoe, and Defendant Deborah Swan.
Page 1 of 82
1
DR 1-102(A)(3)
A. I did not send a written notice of intent to appear to James Leuenberger
because of the fact that I did appear and I did answer to the original complaint.
C. Leuenberger made this statement to mislead the facts in order to cover up his
violations.
D. The facts of my timely appearance and my timely answers can be found within
the self authenticated evidence, starting with the UPS tracking number.
Page 2 of 82
E. This tracking information can be verified by clicking the UPS tracking link,
and entering the following tracking number: 1Z4E716V0121316819
Page 3 of 82
2
DR 1-102(A)(3)
A. August 11, 2014, was the 30TH day and the final day to answer and appear,
therefore I made my appearance and I answered to the complaint.
B. August 11, 2014, was not the 31st day after service.
C. August 11, 2014, was the 30th day, and the day I timely made service.
Page 4 of 82
B. August 11, 2014, is the 30th day, and is the same day Leuenberger began to
draft the premature order for the default judgment.
Page 6 of 82
C. August 11, 2014, was the same day his office employee Michele Wilkinson, at
9:05AM, signed for my UPS proof of delivery.
Page 7 of 82
D. August 11, 2014, is the same day Leuenberger had his employee Michelle
Wilkinson, notarize his sworn affidavit, claiming he had not received my
answers or any notice of any other appearance.
Page 8 of 82
3
DR 1-102(A)(3)
A. This statement by Leuenberger, shows his attempt to circumvent the truth
about the details of when he knowingly began to file for the default judgment.
B. The evidence can also be found in the court records, filed by James
Leuenberger the day after the Oral Argument, for the Objection Hearing on my
MOTION TO VACATE DEFAULT ORDER AND JUDGMENT.
D. The following clips are copied and pasted off of the record. The full copy is
attached as EXHIBIT B.
Page 9 of 82
Page 10 of 82
C. Pursuant to page 2, lines 13 - 15, Around 12:00 Noon, on August 11, 2014,
After he mailed the above described documents, shortly after noon,
Leuenberger then opened his office mail box , and discovered the UPS parcel
which had my answers, affirmative defense and counter claim. DR 1-102(A)
(3)
D.
should have contacted the clerk and told the clerk to hold off on the default when
the papers arrive at the court. DR 1-102(A)(3)
(1) Pursuant to page 2, line 16 - 17, the first action Leuenberger then takes, is he
scanned my answers, affirmative defense and counter claim, and emailed a
copy to Ed Snook, the Plaintiff.
Page 11 of 82
(2) The attached email is the proof that Leuenberger and Snook had already made
the decision to enter this false default judgment against me, by claiming they
never received my answers or appearance. (EXHIBIT C)
(3) The email that Leuenberger sent to Ed snook , clearly proves that there was no
need to explain or discuss any details with Snook. (EXHIBIT C)
(4) This type of communication it is self evident that both Leuenberger and Snook
intentionally and knowingly began a default, before the legal time had expired.
DR 1-102(A)(3)
4
Page 12 of 82
1 min 50 sec
yes you did send answers and appeared, but its not
considered filed yet because there is no money on it yet
5
A. Leuenberger, Ed Snook and the civil clerk Cheryl Shonk, knowingly pushed
this default through the court, knowing it was procured by fraud, deceit, false
facts, false sworn affidavit. DR 1-102(A)(3)
Page 13 of 82
B. The court granted this motion due to the clerk Civil Shonk assisting with
pushing it through, knowing it was false. DR 1-102(A)(3)
C. The judges signed off on the default, due to the fraud and deception that has
been played against the court and judges without their full knowledge of the
true facts about my answers and appearance . DR 1-102(A)(3)
D. Leuenberger continued to file more fraudulent judgments upon the court, and
was awarded a supplemental judgment by Judge Baker, while knowing this
Supplemental was fraud. DR 1-102(A)(3)
E. Leuenberger also was awarded attorney fees by fraud, claiming he had been
following the rules ORCP68. DR 1-102(A)(3)
F. The judge added 9% interest, then placed a lien against me for $49,999.99.
DR 1-102(A)(3)
6
A. Leuenberger is attempting to deceive the BAR without the truth and the facts.
B. The motion I filed against this Default Judgment, was a MOTION TO
VACATE VOID DEFAULT ORDERS AND JUDGMENT .
C. This motion first was filed on September 7, 2014.
Page 14 of 82
Page 15 of 82
A. The note on the previous page, is from Judge Simcoe. Judge Simcoe wrote on
the order that the he denied my telephonic appearance for not sending a copy
to the opposing attorney. Leuenberger gave a false representation to the court,
he did not receive a copy of my MOTION FOR TELEPHONIC
APPEARANCE, and if or when he does he objects.
Page 16 of 82
Page 17 of 82
A. October 23, 2014, the very next day after Judge Simcoe denied my MOTION
FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE, Leuenberger then contradict what he
had just told Judge Simcoe the day before, and now admits on court record that
he did receive my MOTION FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE.
Page 18 of 82
F. This all was intentional by Leuenberger to prejudice the court against me.
7
Page 19 of 82
Leuenberger has not addressed any of my motions. Leuenberger has only made
false claims, denys receiving some of my motions, files false Notices to the Court,
and contradicts himself without any fear of being in violation of the rules.
Leuenberger has continued to make false claims all through this case.
I was not aware of the fraud and the false representation made to the court by
Leuenberger until I received a copy of Leuenbergers NOTICE TO THE
COURT.
This is when I contacted a different clerk and requested a copy of the entire case
file.
I wanted to see every document that has been filed in this case by Leuenberger.
On October 31, 2014, I was sent a email with a copy of the whole case file, that
had a left side and a right side.
This is when I discovered that the false sworn affidavit, the false motions and
default judgment that was presented to the court by fraud, wrongfully claiming I
never appeared, or sent my answers to Leuenberger or to the court before the time
expired for me to appear.
Page 20 of 82
The entire default filed by Leuenberger was procured by false statements, fraud,
and false representations, claiming I never appeared or sent my answers to the
clerk or to Leuenberger.
This current attempt of Leuenberger to deceive the BAR, by giving more false
representations about the facts around my appearance and answers, so the BAR
will not have the correct facts in an attempt to lead the BAR into the false
direction, is another violation pursuant to Rule 8.4.
This is self evidence that Leuenberger will do what ever he can to cover his
violations without any concern to how he is affecting the Judiciary in whole.
The record is the self authenticated evidence which proves that Leuenberger and
his client Ed Snook, knowingly used this court to commit the crime of extortion,
by fraud, perjury, concealing documents, filing false sworn affidavits, all of which
are crimes against the Tribunal, as well as Deborah Swan.
Page 21 of 82
OBJECTION HEARING
ORAL ARGUMENT
During the November 12, 2014, Objection Hearing, I made an oral judicial notice
of the fraud, false sworn affidavits, and false representation made by James
Leuenebrger on each of the records he filed.
The following is on record, from the oral argument.
During the hearing, after I orally judicially noticed the court.
Leuenberger continued to make false statements as facts through
the entire hearing, and when Judge Hull asked him the direct
questions about my appearance and answers.
H. Leuenberger continued to tell Judge Hull false statements.
I.
The following are the actual statements made between Judge Hull and
Leuenberger during the Objection Hearing on November 12, 2014.
Page 22 of 82
K. James Leuenberger made the following statements which can be found in the
official court records of this oral argument:
19 min 45 sec. There was no misstatements, there was no violation of
Rule17 regarding the sign a pleading for the motion that
matter, that I was not saying anything misleading or asking in
violation of the law or asking for something that Mr. Snook
was not entitled to.
L.
Ed Snook was not entitled too a $50,000.00 default judgment with attorney
fees.
Page 23 of 82
A. Leuenberger had the opportunity to correct the false statements he made about my
answers and my appearance.
B. Leuenberger chose to continue with the false claims that I had not answered or
appeared at all.
20 min 38 m sec
A. Leuenberger has a legal duty to the court, to not knowingly make false claims
as facts.
B. Leuenebrger and his client Ed Snook both are knowingly committing fraud
upon the court, by continuing to commit perjury.
C. Leuenberger did receive Deborah Swans answers and I did make my
appearance before the time expired.
Judge Hull then asked Leuenberger if Deborah Swan still had not made any
appearance or answered.
20 min 55 sec
Page 24 of 82
she was allowed to file a motion, after the judgment was entered. 2No the
answer was not filed and received by the court before the order of default
judgment 3Well, She appeared when she was allowed to file a motion after the
judgment was entered. 4No the answer was not filed and received by the court
before the order of default or the judgment of default , so I believe Ms Swan
A. The entire above statement by Leuenberger was made to deceive the court.
B. Leuenberger did receive my answers and Leuenberger knew the clerk also
received my answers on August 11, 2014.
C. Therefore Leuenberger is making a false claim that my answers were not
filed or received before the order of default judgment, is another false
representation by Leuenberger, knowing it is false.
D. I made my appearance when the court was served my answers.
1Leuenberger
knowingly made a false statement. Leuenberger knows that he entered a default judgment
after I had legally answered and appeared.
2Yes,
an answer was filed and received by the court before the order of default judgment was entered by
Leuenberger.
3I
4Yes
the answer was filed and received by the court before the order of default or the judgment of default ,
Page 25 of 82
Page 26 of 82
D. Leuenberger already knew the civil clerk Cheryl Shonk did not officially
enter into the register when she received Deborah Swans answers.
E. This is aiding and abetting by the clerk Cheryl Shonk for not following her
duty which is to enter the time of day, the date of when the clerk was served
the answers by the defendant.
F.
ORCP says the following: Appearance is made by filing with the clerk
ORCP 7 :Filing is made upon the date of mailing.
A. Judge Hull believed Leuenbergers false statements he made.
B. Since the OJIN court register did not have any entry of my answers, counter
claim, or affirmative defense, entered into the OJIN register.
C. Leuenberger and Snook were fully aware that both he and the civil clerk
received my answers, affirmative defenses and counter claims on August 11,
2014, before the time to appear had expired. VIOLATED RULE 3.2 (a) (b)
Page 27 of 82
D. On August 13, 2014, Leuenberger received a call from the civil clerk.
E. The clerk contacted Leuenberger when she received Leuenbergers documents
that he mailed to the court to file for the default order and judgment.
F. The civil clerk informed Leuenberger that on August 11, 2014, she did receive
my answers on time.
G. The civil clerk explained there was a delay with my fee waiver application.
H.
Leuenberger told the clerk to continue with the default judgment anyway.
VIOLATED RULE 3.2 (a) (b)
I.
Page 28 of 82
A. Leuenbergers actions are clear violation of ethics and his duty to correct his
actions by not continuing to commit fraud upon the court, as well as not
continue to use the court to unlawfully extort money out of me.
B. In the above statement by Leuenberger, when he says, as far as I know,
Leuenberger did know that I was not trying to deceive the court and he knew
that certificate of service was a typographical mistake. Leuenberger and I had a
20 minute phone call a week before this hearing, that I made to him when I
received his NOTICE TO THE COURT, accusing me of deceiving the court.
We discussed this and worked it out. I corrected my mistake and he received a
copy of the corrected certificate of service.
Leuenberger is trying to do
anything he can to paint a false light to prejudice the court against me, This is
not ethical and is a violation of Rules of Professional Misconduct.
Judge Hulls attitude becomes more indifferent towards me as this hearing
continues due to the constant false statements that Leuenberger continues to use
against me.
Judge Hull then asked me if I have any response to Leuenbergers testimony.
At 24 min 19 sec, I state:
Yes Sir. I would like to state there has deception on my side when it comes to
the certificate of service. When I realized I had a typographical error, I
immediately corrected it, and I actually called mr. Leuenberger on the phone,
Page 29 of 82
and let him know it was a mistake. I immediately sent in a motion to correct it
and add it to the case. It was just an error on my part, just a mistake. So that was
corrected. The tone of voice by Judge Hull was obvious that the judge was not
believing anything I was saying during this hearing.
HULL:
Anything else?
Page 30 of 82
During this part of the hearing, Judge Hull discussed with the
court clerk Cameron, what was entered in the OJIN register.
Judge Hull stated at 28 min 33 sec:
I dont see anything about additional document including the
application being filed. But I dont know. Are they usually done
that way or is it just the waiver filed without the documents?
HULL:
JIM :
HULL:
JIM:
Page 32 of 82
JIM:
HULL::
JIM:
HULL:
JIM:
HULL:
HULL:
JIM:
Page 33 of 82
HULL:
Okay.
HULL:
Page 34 of 82
HULL:
SWAN: Yes sir if you look at the court, at the file, i don't know if
its been entered, cause Im not their, but you can even ask
your clerk cheryl yourself. i was told on the 11th she
received my answers. i was told on the that the hold up for
why my,i was under the impression, that she entered
me as my appearance and I answered. The hold up, I was
under that impression,and I have all this on recorded
conversation, I record everything because this use all new
to me, and because I am in Texas. Cheryl told me on the
12th that she has spoken to Mr Leuenberger.
Mr Leuenberger was informed that I did appear and they
did receive my appearance and my answers, but the hold up
was my fee waiver application. and Cheryl then asked Mr
Leuenberger, what do you want me to do? Mr Leuenberger
Page 35 of 82
Page 36 of 82
Im having finical issues in my life, and that should not be able to hold
me back to step forward and defend myself from a claim against me.
And that is what this whole thing has turned into,. This fee waiver
application is restricting my rights to my own due process of law. and
that is the right to be heard, and a right to appear. okay. and any
appellate judges would side with me and the supreme court also has a
lot of case law that there should never be any sort of price tag
related your righted to the judicial process. and that is what
Leuenberger did get my appearance and did get my answers. and
if I have to appeal his I will, cause Ive got the proof to it. and I
will file a suit affiant your clerk if I have to get her to speak
honestly because Cheryl knows all the details involved here. Ands
so does Lisa, and so does JUDY.
JIM
SWAN
Yes sir
JIM
SWAN
HULL
SWAN:
Page 37 of 82
HULL:
SWAN:
HULL:
SWAN:
HULL:
SWAN
HULL:
SWAN:
HULL:
Well I cant tell you what to do. I cant tell you what
you need or don't need. This is your opportunity to a
hearing. You obviously knew about the time for
the hearing , this is the time to present the material. It does
not keep going. We don't continue and continue ad continue,
okay? So right now this is the hearing time and this is when
you have the opportunity to present what you want to okay.
SWAN
Okay.
Page 38 of 82
SWAN
JIM
inaudible
HULL
SWAN:
Mr Leuenberger
JIM:
SWAN
HULL
umm maam,
SWAN
Yes sir
HULL
Okay you can ask a question but you cant ask him what
he thinks his opinion is of the law.
SWAN: Okay well that why, let me ask him one more question if
you don't mind why then on all these orders
Page 39 of 82
Page 40 of 82
Page 41 of 82
SWAN
Every order that you have filed states that you have not
received any answer or any appearance from me or any
intent of my appearance.
HULL
SWAN
All right.
HULL
I
HULL
Page 42 of 82
5162.355
1.
SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS.
James Leuenberger knowingly issued and delivered to the Civil Clerk Cheryl
Shonk, in Josephine County Court, documents that in form and substance, falsely
simulated the action of entering a false default judgment against Deborah Swan for
$49,999.99.
2.
162.075 FALSE SWEARING.
(1) James Leuenberger knowingly committed the crime of false swearing by
making false sworn statements, and false unsworn declarations, knowing it to be
false.
(2) False swearing is a Class A misdemeanor. [1971 c.743 184; 2013 c.218 20]
Page 43 of 82
3.
ORS 164.0 THEFT
Page 44 of 82
D. Leuenberger and Ed Snook, have both failed to correct this false impression
about Deborah Swan, which they intentionally started on August 11, 2014.
E.
F.
James Leuenberger has prevented Judge Thomas Hull, Judge Lynn Baker, and
Judge Daniel Simcoe, from acquiring the truthful information involving
Deborah Swans appearance, affirmative defenses, answers, and counter
claim, that Deborah Swan sent on time to James Leuenbergers office, on
August 11, 2014, at 9:05 A.M..
James Leuenbergers oral confession, during the objection hearing November 12,
2014.
James Leuenberger filed response to the Defendants Judicial Notices November
13, 2014.
Deborah Swans Proof of Delivery to James Leuenbergers office on August 11,
2014 by UPS and tracking number
Cheryl Shonk, the civil clerks statement to Deborah Swan, on August 12, 2014,
when Cheryl confirmed to Deborah that she spoke with James Leuenberger, and he
confirmed he did receive her answers, counter complaint, and affirmative defense
on time. (RECORDED PHONE CALL ATTACHED IN THE EMAIL)
Page 46 of 82
The following statements we're stated on court record in Judge Thomas Hulls
court room on November 12, 2014, as well as Leuenberger response he filed to the
court on November 13, 2014.
The following is from the response he filed.
November 12, 2014, During the oral argument, Deborah Swan judicially noticed
Judge Thomas Hull, of fraud, false representation, and misconduct.
The following is on record, from the oral argument.
SWAN Yes I would like to add to the record, a judicial
notice of new evidence that I have discovered of fraud
on all the
HULL Okay that did not just happen automatically. you
have to tell me what is you're trying to admit, because
here are rules.
SWAN
HULL
SWAN
HULL
SWAN
HULL
Page 47 of 82
SWAN
Page 48 of 82
SWAN
HULL
SWAN
Page 49 of 82
Page 50 of 82
And that is why he is filing for a default. But I did appear, and
I did send answers to both the court clerk, as well asJames on
time. So this default judgment is void.
HULL: When you say it was sent, does that mean the day you
forwarded it here?
SWAN
HULL
SWAN
Page 51 of 82
Page 52 of 82
HULL
SWAN
Page 53 of 82
HULL
SWAN
HULL
Carry on
SWAN
HULL
SWAN
HULL
SWAN
HULL
SWAN
HULL
Page 54 of 82
SWAN
HULL
SWAN
HULL
SWAN
HULL
SWAN
Page 55 of 82
Page 56 of 82
HULL:
SWAN:
HULL:
Okay, carry on
SWAN:
Page 57 of 82
Page 58 of 82
Page 59 of 82
Page 60 of 82
Page 61 of 82
Page 62 of 82
Page 63 of 82
Page 64 of 82
Page 65 of 82
Page 66 of 82
SWAN
HULL
G. These facts are pertinent to the disposition of the courts for approving or
denying a motion for a default judgment.
FRAUD
A. The fraud, false representation, and misconduct, that has been perpetrated by
James Leuenberger, and Edward Snook, is how they were able to place the
$49,999.99 fraudulent default judgment against Deborah Swan.
B. August 11, 2014, James Leuenberger knowingly sent to the Josephine County
Court, a motion for a DEFAULT AND GENERAL JUDGMENT, with a false
supporting affidavit, for the intent to defraud and make false representation.
Page 67 of 82
C. On August 13, 2014, James Leuenberger knowingly mis lead the court by filing
these false motions, where he stated as a fact, claiming that he had not received
Deborahs answers, and that he has no knowledge of Deborah Swan having any
intent to appear.
D. This information is pertinent to the disposition whether a default order and
judgment, attorney fees and money award would be allowed according to the
rules of default judgments to be granted. 6
E. Defendants Leuenberger knowingly committed fraud upon Judge Thomas
Hull, Deborah Swan, and Josephine County Circuit Court, by filing under oath
these false sworn affidavits, and false representations to the court, claiming
Deborah Swan had NOT appeared or filed her answers and had no knowledge
of the Deborah Swans intent to appear.
F. These mis representations, deceptions and fraud, caused Judge Hull to
unlawfully entered a $49,999.99 default judgment against Deborah Swan, with
a lien and 9% interest, with awarded attorney fees all to be paid.
6Under
Page 68 of 82
165.102
OBTAINING EXECUTION OF DOCUMENTS BY DECEPTION.
A. James Leuenberger and Edward Snook knowingly committed the crime of
obtaining, and the execution of documents by deception, with intent to
knowingly defraud and injure Deborah Swan, to acquire a substantial benefit
for himself, and Leuenbergers client Ed Snook.
Under Former Similar Statute (Ors 165.205)The accused must have intended to defraud the injured party, made a false pretense,
the latter must have relied on the false representation believing it to be true and must thereby have been induced to part with
something of value. State v. Clermont, 9 Or App 141, 495 P2d 305 (1972),
Page 69 of 82
B. Leuenberger and Edward Snook, knowingly allowed the court to approve false
money awards and damages, at the expense of Deborah Swan, knowing the
judgments and money awards and damages were procured through fraud,
theft, false representations and deceit.
C. Leuenberger, the civil clerk Cheryl Shonk, and Edward Snook both
knowingly concealed the facts about Deborah Swans answers, affirmative
defense, counterclaim, fee waiver application, and appearance, that Civil
Clerk Cheryl Shonk, James Leuenberger and Edward Snook all received on
time, before the time expired, to deceive the Josephine County Judges.
D. This criminal concealment was perpetrated by the Civil Clerk Cheryl Shonk,
Leuenberger and Ed Snook, to enter the false default judgment, order of a
money award, damages and attorney fees to be unlawfully forced to be paid
by Deborah Swan.
E.
On August 11, 2014, James Leuenberger and Edward Snook, knowingly sent
false, fraudulent documents to the civil clerk Cheryl Shonk.
F.
On August 15, 2015, James Leuenberger and his client Ed Snook, knowingly
deceived Judge Thomas Hull into signing a fraudulent General Judgment and
Money Award, with post judgment interest at 9% per annum, attorney fees
Page 70 of 82
An accused acts knowingly under the ABA Standards when he has "conscious awareness of the nature or attendant
circumstances of the conduct but without the conscious objective or purpose to accomplish a particular result." ABA
Standards at 17. The Oregon criminal standard for a "knowing[]" mental state articulated in ORS 161.085(8) and the
ABA standard for "knowing" conduct describe the same state of mind. Therefore, as to the convictions for false
reporting and improper use of the emergency reporting system, the record establishes that the accused acted with at
least a knowing state of mind.
Page 71 of 82
County, Oregon.
James Leuenberger filed a false default
C. The records that have been filed in this case is the self authenticated
evidence of fraud, misconduct and misrepresentation.
D. The records show where Leuenberger has claimed that the Defendant did
not appear nor does he has any knowledge of the Defendant appearing.
E. The confession by James Leuenberger during the objection hearing, that he DID
receive the Defendants answers, affirmative defense and counter claim, clearly
proves this default judgment is not legal.
Annotated ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct 3.3; cf. DR 7-102(B)(1); see
also DR 1-102(A)(3) (lawyer may not engage in conduct involving dishonesty,
fraud, deceit or misrepresentation).
Leuenberger has admitted on court record, in his response to the Judicial Notice I
orally made during the Objection Hearing help on November 12, 2014, in Judge
Thomas Hulls courtroom.
Page 72 of 82
TITLE 18
2071
CONCEALMENT, REMOVAL, OR MUTILATION GENERALLY
A. On August 11, 2014, Deborah Swan filed, deposited with the civil clerk Cheryl
Shonk in Josephine County Circuit Court, and with employee Michelle
Wilkinson, at the office of James Leuenberger Fight 4 Rights, her answers,
affirmative defense and counter claim.
C. The purpose for concealing Deborah Swans answers, affirmative defense, and
counter claim Leuenberger received by UPS, was to present false facts to the
Josephine Circuit Court Judges, in order to be granted a $49,999.99 default
judgment against Deborah Swan.
D. Cheryl Shonk, the civil clerk knowingly concealed Deborah Swan's answers,
affirmative defense, and counter claim by refusing to enter into the court OJIN
register that Deborah Swan did make her appearance and did answer to the
complaint on August 11, 2014 before the legal time had expired.
Page 73 of 82
E. Leuenberger thought he was emailing Judge Hull, but instead he sent the email
to Judge Hill out in Linn County.
F. When Judge Hill opened up the email and discovered what Jim was doing,
Judge Hill responded to Leuenberger by reminding Leuenberger that this type
of communications with a judge is not legal.
Page 74 of 82
Page 75 of 82
6.21
Page 76 of 82
EXHIBIT A1
Page 77 of 82
EXHIBIT A2
EXHIBIT B
Page 79 of 82
EXHIBIT C
LEUENBERGER SENT THIS EMAIL TO Ed SNOOK ON
AUGUST 11, 2014 AT 12:02 PM.
THIS PROVES LEUENBERGER AND SNOOK
DID RECEIVE DEBORAH SWANS ANSWERS,
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE AND COUNTER CLAIM,
BEFORE THE LEGAL TIME EXPIRED .
Page 80 of 82
EXHIBIT D
THE PROOF THAT LEUENBERGER GAVE
FALSE FACTS TO JUDGE SIMCOE BY
CLAIMING HE DID NOT RECEIVE A COPY OF
MY TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE.
Page 81 of 82
Page 82 of 82