Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
REV. 4/2014
ORIGINAL
purpose
DEFENDANTS
- y,
FLAGST^t FOQDS (a/kV&NACKS HC0MNGOJ*&
r^ -'-4
CAUSE OF ACTION (CITE THE U.S. CIVIL STATUTE UNDER WHICH YOU ARE FILING AND WRITE ABRIEF STATEMENT OF CAUSE)
(DO NOT CITE JURISDICTIONAL STATUTES UNLESS DIVERSITY)
Action for trade dress infringement and false designation of origin under 15 U.S.C. 1125(a) and other state/federal unfair competition laws.
Has this action, case, or proceeding, or one essentially the same been previously filed in SDNY at any time? Nr&esQjudge Previously Assigned
No [*]
&Case No.
Yes fj]
NATURE OF SUIT
ACTIONS UNDER STATUTES
CONTRACI
PERSONAL INJURY
PERSONAL INJURY
[ ] 367 HEALTHCARE/
[ ] 110
[ 1120
[J130
[]140
[J 150
[ ] 151
[]152
INSURANCE
MARINE
MILLER ACT
[]160
LIABILITY
NEGOTIABLE
INSTRUMENT
RECOVERY OF
[ ] 330 FEDERAL
SLANDER
OVERPAYMENT &
EMPLOYERS'
ENFORCEMENT
LIABILITY
OF JUDGMENT
MEDICARE ACT
RECOVERY OF
DEFAULTED
STUDENT LOANS
(EXCL VETERANS)
[]153
[ ] 310 AIRPLANE
[ ] 315 AIRPLANE PRODUCT
[ ] 340 MARINE
[ ] 345 MARINE PRODUCT
LIABILITY
[ ]195
OF VETERAN'S
BENEFITS
STOCKHOLDERS
INJURY
MED MALPRACTICE
[ ] 196 FRANCHISE
REAL PROPERTY
I ]210
LAND
[ ]220
[ ]230
CONDEMNATION
FORECLOSURE
RENT LEASE &
EJECTMENT
[]240
[]245
TORTS TO LAND
TORT PRODUCT
LIABILITY
[ ]290
ALL OTHER
LABOR
VACATE SENTENCE
28 USC 2255
CIVIL RIGHTS
DISABILITIES EMPLOYMENT
ANTITRUST
BANKS & BANKING
COMMERCE
DEPORTATION
RACKETEER INFLU
ENCED & CORRUPT
ORGANIZATION ACT
(RICO)
[ 1480 CONSUMER CREDIT
[ ] 490 CABLE/SATELLITE TV
[ ) 850 SECURITIES/
COMMODITIES/
EXCHANGE
LEAVEACT (FMLA)
[ ] 790 OTHER LABOR
LITIGATION
IMMIGRATION
[ ] 462 NATURALIZATION
] 410
] 430
] 450
] 460
] 470
RELATIONS
SECURITY ACT
REAPPORTIONMENT
[
[
[
[
[
(Non-Prisoner)
28 USC 157
[ J 861 HIA(1395ff)
PROPERTY DAMAGE
PRISONER PETITIONS
ACCOMMODATIONS
[ ] 423 WITHDRAWAL
SOCIAL SECURITY
I J 375 FALSECLAIMS
28 USC 158
[ ] 820 COPYRIGHTS
[ ] 830 PATENT
M 840 TRADEMARK
[ ] 720 LABOR/MGMT
[ ] 441 VOTING
[ ] 442 EMPLOYMENT
[ J 443 HOUSING/
OTHER STATUTES
[ 1400 STATE
PROPERTY RIGHTS
PERSONAL PROPERTY
PRODUCT LIABILITY
OTHER
CONTRACT
CONTRACT
BANKRUPTCY
[ J 422 APPEAL
INJURY PRODUCT
LIABILITY
PRODUCT LIABILITY
RECOVERY OF
OVERPAYMENT
PRODUCT
LIABILITY
21 USC 881
PRODUCT LIABILITY
SUITS
[]190
FORFEITURE/PENALTY
PHARMACEUTICAL PERSONAL
[ J 625 DRUG RELATED
INJURY/PRODUCT LIABILITY
SEIZURE OF PROPERTY
APPLICATION
[ ] 893 ENVIRONMENTAL
MATTERS
[ ] 895 FREEDOM OF
26 USC 7609
INFORMATION ACT
[ J 896 ARBITRATION
[ ] 899 ADMINISTRATIVE
PROCEDURE ACT/REVIEW OR
APPEAL OF AGENCY DECISION
[ ] 950 CONSTITUTIONALITY OF
STATE STATUTES
CONDITIONS OF CONFINEMENT
DISABILITIES -OTHER
[ ] 448 EDUCATION
REAL PROPERTY
DEMAND $ Damages
OTHER Injunction
DOCKET NUMBER
NOTE: You must also submit atthe time of filing the Statement of Relatedness form (Form IH-32).
(PLACEAN x INONEBOXONLY)
L*J 1 Original
ORIGIN
Proceeding
LJ 3 Remanded LJ 4 Reinstated or
State Court
from
Reopened
(Specify District)
Litigation
Appellate
Court
I I b. At least one
party is pro se.
(PLACEAN xINONEBOXONLY)
\J 1 U.S. PLAINTIFF
BASIS OF JURISDICTION
IF DIVERSITY, INDICATE
Q4 DIVERSITY
CITIZENSHIP BELOW.
DEF
[ ]1
[ ]1
CITIZEN OR SUBJECT OF A
FOREIGN COUNTRY
[]3[]3
[ ]2
[ ]4 [ ]4
CITIZEN OF THISSTATE
PTF DEF
PTF
DEF
[ ]5
[ ]5
[ J6
1372 Broadway
New York, NY 10018
New York County
AMPORT FOODS
REPRESENTATION IS HEREBY MADE THAT, AT THIS TIME, IHAVE BEEN UNABLE, WITH REASONABLE DILIGENCE TO ASCERTAIN
RESIbENCE ADDRESSES OF THE FOLLOWING DEFENDANTS:
Check one:
\J WHITE PLAINS
(DO NOT check either box ifthis a PRISONER PETITION/PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS
\k\ MANHATTAN
COMPLAINT.)
DATE 2/23/2015
DC|DT#
KtL/tlH' ff
^
/^ ^^
'=:=
^y^
-~-*
-^
[]
NO (DATE ADMITTED Mo. .11
W YES
Magistrate Judge
RubyJ. Krajick, Clerk of Court by
is so Designated.
. Deputy Clerk, DATED
Yr. 1999 )
JUDGE ENGELMAYER
David H. Bernstein (dhbernstein@debevoise.com)
Jyotin Hamid (jhamid@debevoise.com)
Charles W. Baxter (cwbaxter@debevoise.com)
ECF CASE
KIND LLC,
c;:
Plaintiff,
KIND LLC ("KIND"), by its attorneys, Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, for its
complaint against Flagstone Foods also known as Snacks Holding Corp. and Amport
Foods also known as American Importing Co., Inc. (together, "Flagstone"), alleges as
follows:
INTRODUCTION
1.
This is an action for trade dress infringement, deceptive acts and practices,
unfair competition, and related claims arising from Flagstone's launch of its new
NATURE'S HARVEST snack bars in packaging that was designed intentionally to
mimic the look of KIND'S distinctive trade dress. Flagstone is, by its own account, one
of the largest manufacturers and distributors of private label healthy snack products in
North America. Recognizing the rapid growth in the healthy snackindustry generated by
KIND'S innovative healthy snack bar products, Flagstone decided to produce and market
a derivative, private label version of top-selling KIND products. But Flagstone has done
more than develop derivative, private label products. It has adopted packaging for those
When KIND bars entered the market a decade ago, they transformed the
nutritional snack bar category by using simple, whole ingredients the consumer could
"see and pronounce." This was a revolutionary change; most other bars at the time were
made from unrecognizable and unpronounceable ingredients that were extruded into
brown globs. To emphasize KIND'S use of simple, whole ingredients and the high
nutritional quality of its bars, as well as to create a distinctive, sleek, modern impression
on store shelves, KIND designed an innovative and distinctive trade dress which
3.
Sometimes these products fill a gap in a retailer's branded offerings, and sometimes they
provide a retailer with a product designed to compete with higher-priced branded
alternatives in the same retail space.
4.
competition from private label manufacturers who do not cross the line, KIND cannot
stand by while a leading private label manufacturer seeks to usurp KIND'S hard-earned
goodwill and confuse the consuming public by releasing a private-label version of
KIND'S products in packaging designed to be confused with KIND'S distinctive
packaging.
5.
As shown above, the new NATURE'S HARVEST trade dress mimics the
distinctive overall impression of KIND's packaging trade dress, appropriating several key
aspects of KIND'S unique look to create a confusingly similar overall impression.
Among these striking similarities are (1) a transparent, rectangular front panel in
essentially identical proportion to the remaining package; (2) a horizontal stripe of
essentially identical proportion bisecting the transparent front panel and containing the
flavor of the bar in text; (3) an opaque panel, offset to the side of the package, containing
the brand identifier above a bulleted list of many of the bar's key healthful attributes; (4)
a thin vertical line in a contrasting color, marking the border between the transparent
panel and the brand-identifier panel; (5) opaque vertical bands, or end caps, at either edge
of the product package; and (6) a roughly identical slender shape. The overall impression
conveyed by the NATURE'S HARVEST trade dress, in its entirety, is confusingly
similar to that created by the KIND packaging.
6.
The confluence of similarities between the KIND Trade Dress and the
potential private label offering. KIND notified Flagstone that the images Flagstone was
using to market its private label product infringed KIND'S rights in its unique package,
and Flagstone confirmed that the images were concepts only, that it would immediately
discontinue use of each image in its marketing efforts, and that it would take KIND's
concerns into consideration in the future. There is no question that Flagstone is fully
aware of KIND's rights and has made a conscious decision to disregard them.
7.
which will cause serious and irreparable harm to KIND. This conduct, if not enjoined,
could eviscerate the goodwill KIND has spent years carefully cultivating for its brand.
THE PARTIES
8.
KIND is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State
of Delaware with its principal place of business at 1372 Broadway, New York, New York
10018.
9.
corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware with its
principal place of business at 380 St. Peter Street, Number 1000, St. Paul, Minnesota,
55102.
10.
business corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota
with its principal place of business at 380 St. Peter Street, Number 1000, St. Paul,
Minnesota, 55102.
11.
This Court has original jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action
pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1121 and 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338 and has supplemental
jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367(a).
12.
Civ. Prac. L. & R. 302(a). Defendants are regularly soliciting business and have
transacted business in the State of New York and in this District through marketing and
product displays on the Internet, sale of their products on a nationwide basis including
extensive sales throughout the State of New York and in this District, and sale of
products through Internet retailers. Defendants derive substantial revenue from interstate
commerce. In addition, through their activities, Defendants are wrongfully causing injury
to KIND in the State of New York and in this District, such injury being reasonably
foreseeable.
13.
Plaintiff resides in this district under 28 U.S.C. 1391(c), and because Defendants
conduct business in this District.
14.
KIND is a market leader in the nutritional snack bar category and is the
number one brand in the healthy snack bar segment within the nutritional snack bar
category. KIND's Fruit & Nut bars transformed the nutritional snack bar category when
they were launched a decade ago. Unlike most other leading nutritional snack barsthen
and nowwhich typically start from a paste or emulsion, KIND's healthy snack bars are
made from identifiable, nutritionally rich "ingredients you can see and pronounce," a
KIND designed a graphic identity for its bars that would resonate with its
core brand proposition (simple, whole ingredients you can see and pronounce) and which
would convey a distinctive, sleek, and modern impression on store shelves. This trade
dress, shared among three product lines, consists of the distinctive arrangement and
configuration consists of four rectangular segments. The segments at both edges of the
package are the same contrasting opaque color. Along the right edge of the left-most
segment runs a vertical line of approximately 1/16 of an inch in width. Immediately to
the right of the 1/16 inch line is a transparent segment, which consists of a rectangular,
appears a list of product attributes, each bulleted with a stylized check mark. Above the
product line identifier is the brand identifier, "KIND," in white capital letters against the
black background. Above the brand identifier are four smaller vertical rectangular bars
colored yellow, red, green and blue from left to right. Separating the black-colored
segment and the transparent segment is a vertical red-colored line approximately 1/32 of
an inch in width.
16.
These three healthy snack bar lines are comprised of bars in 22 flavors, all
of which utilize the distinctive KIND Shared Trade Dress. Since its inception, KIND has
sold nearly 500 million healthy snack bars in the United States in the KIND Shared Trade
Dress.
17.
Each of the individual flavors has a packaging that incorporates the KIND
a.
For example, since 2004 KIND has packaged its Almond &
Apricot bar in the package depicted below (the "KIND A&A Trade
Dress").
the package are yellow in color. Along the right portion of the left-most
segment, and visible on the face of the package, appear the terms
"NATURAL INGREDIENTS YOU CAN" in gold, sans-serif font. The
1/16 inch vertical line along the right edge of the left-most segment is gold
in color. Within the horizontal black-colored band bisecting the
transparent rectangular segment is the flavor identifier, "ALMOND &
APRICOT," in white, sans-serif letters and a stylized ampersand. The
product line identifier "FRUIT & NUT" appears within the black-colored
segment in white, sans-serif font, and below, visible on the leading face of
b.
in the KIND Shared Trade Dress above. The segments at both edges of
the package are dark brown in color. Along the right portion of the left
most segment, and visible on the face of the package, appear the terms
"NATURAL INGREDIENTS YOU CAN" in gold, sans-seriffont. The
1/16 inch vertical line along the right edge of the left-most segment is gold
in color. Within the horizontal black-colored band bisecting the
transparent rectangular segment is the flavor identifier, "ALMOND &
segment in white, sans-serif font, and below, visible on the leading face of
the package, in smaller sans-serif font appear the following product
attributes, each accompanied by a stylized check-mark: "ALL NATURAL
/ NON GMO," "GLUTEN FREE," "LOW GLYCEMIC," and "GOOD
SOURCE OF FIBER." Since 2011, KIND has achieved over $72.6
million in measured outlet retail sales of Almond & Coconut bars in the
distinctive KIND A&C Trade Dress.
c.
Cranberry Almond bar in the package depicted below (The "KIND CA+
Trade Dress").
in the KIND Shared Trade Dress above. The segments at both edges of
the package are burgundy in color, with a repeating pattern overlay of
white "plus" symbols. The 1/16 inch vertical line along the right edge of
the left-most segment is gold in color. Within the horizontal black-colored
10
colored segment in gold, sans-serif font, and below, visible on the leading
face of the package, in smaller white sans-serif font appear the following
product attributes, each accompanied by a stylized check-mark: "50% DV
ANTIOXIDANTS VITAMINS A, C AND E," and "ALL NATURAL /
NON GMO." Since 2011, KIND has achieved over $62.6 million in
d.
Peanut Butter Dark Chocolate bar in the package depicted below (the
"KIND PBDC+ Trade Dress")
shared elements in the KIND Shared Trade Dress above. The segments at
11
both edges ofthe package are light brown in color, with a repeating
pattern overlay ofwhite "plus" symbols. The 1/16 inch vertical line along
the right edge of the left-most segment is gold in color. Within the
identifier "PLUS" appears within the black-colored segment in gold, sansserif font, and below, visible on the leading face of the package, in smaller
white sans-serif font appearthe following product attributes, each
accompanied by a stylized check-mark: "7g PROTEIN, "ALL NATURAL
/ NON GMO," "GLUTEN FREE," and "LOW GLYCEMIC." Since
2011, KIND has achieved over $88.3 million in measured outlet retail
sales of Peanut Butter Dark Chocolate bars in the distinctive KIND
PBDC+ Trade Dress.
18.
covering elements of its packaging trade dress, for "healthy snacks, namely, nut and seed
based snack bars; processed fruit-and-nut-based food bars, nut based snack food bars,
fruit based snack food bars also containing nuts, grains, cereals and dried fruit." KIND
also owns Federal Trademark Registration No. 4,097,493, covering elements of its
packaging trade dress, for, inter alia, "nutrition bars, namely, nut and seed based snack
12
bars; processed fruit-and-nut-based food bars, nut based snack food bars, fruit based
snack food bars also containing nuts, grains, cereals and dried fruit." (Together, the
"KIND Registered Trade Dress.")
19.
The KIND Registered Trade Dress, the KIND Shared Trade Dress, and
each of the trade dresses of the individual flavors, including the KIND A&A Trade Dress,
KIND A&C Trade Dress, KIND CA+ Trade Dress, and KIND PBDC+ Trade Dress, are
20.
The success of KIND bars stems not only from the high quality of the
products, but also from the distinctive brand image communicated by the KIND Trade
Dress. Indeed, the KIND Trade Dress is among the most significant ways in which
consumers identify the brand on shelves, and is thus among KIND's most valuable
intellectual property.
21.
products using the distinctive KIND Trade Dress. The KIND Trade Dress is featured
Since 2011 these programs have generated more than 1 billion media impressions.
distributing more than 25 million KIND bars as samples. In 2004, KIND spent
approximately $300,000 advertising KIND bars including sales promotion and trade
13
spending. This figure rose to more than $70 million in 2014. Altogether, since 2004,
KIND has spent over $150 million marketing its healthy snack bars.
22. KIND bars have received multiple awards, including All You - Snack Star,
Climbing - Editor's Choice (2014), Fitness - Best Pre-Workout Snacks (2014), Outside
- Travel Awards (2014), Prevention - 125 Cleanest Packaged Goods (2014), SELFBest Energy Bar (2014), Men's Health - Best Breakfast Bar(2014), Men's Health Best Energy Bar(2014), Women's Health - Supermarket Stars (2014), Prevention -
Best Bar (2011), Natural Products Expo - Best New Product (2008), and many others.
KIND bars also have received extensive unsolicited media coverage in major
publications such as TIME, BusinessWeek, Food &Wine, Oprah's O Magazine, Good
Housekeeping, Ladies Home Journal, Progressive Grocer, Health Magazine, and The
New York Times. KIND bars have been featured on national television programs such
as The Today Show, Good Morning America, and the Rachel Ray Show. Through
these media outlets, KIND bars have received in excess of 7.5 billion earned media
23. KIND bars are the fastest growing product in the nutritional snack bar
category and can be found in more than 150,000 locations. During the 52 weeks ending
December 28, 2014, sales of KIND bars in SPINS/IRI outlets enjoyed a growth rate of
62% while KIND's closest competitor in the space, LARABAR, saw sales grow by
20%. Fourteen ofthe top 15 performing products in the healthy snack bar segment are
KIND products.
14
24. Growth in the sales of KIND bars has led to significantrevenue for KIND.
In 2014 alone, KIND sold approximately 200 million KIND bars in measured retail
outlets, resulting in retail sales of approximately $300 million. Since 2011, KIND sold
more than 450 million KIND bars in measured retail outlets, with aggregate retail sales
well in excess of $625 million.
25.
rapidly expanding the healthy snack bar market. Every day KIND is reaching new
consumers who have never tried a healthy snack bar before. This rapidly expanding
market has not gone unnoticed by KIND's competition, and KIND has seen a steady
stream of new product entrants with offerings similar to KIND's innovative products; a
development KIND welcomes so long as competitors strive to compete on the merits of
their products and not on consumer deception.
26.
Hagstone recently released and began selling a private label snack bar product underits
NATURE'S HARVEST label. Flagstone offers this product in at least three varieties, in
15
27.
As shown above, the new NATURE'S HARVEST trade dress mimics the
distinctive overall impression of KIND's packaging trade dress, appropriating several key
aspects of KIND's unique packaging to create a confusingly similar overall impression.
Among these striking similarities are (1) a transparent, rectangular front panel in
a thin vertical line in a contrasting color, marking the border between the transparent
panel and the brand-identifier panel; (5) opaque vertical bands, or end caps, at either edge
of the product package; and (6) a roughly identical slender shape. The overall impression
conveyed by the NATURE'S HARVEST trade dress is confusingly similar to the overall
impression created by KIND's distinctive package.
16
28.
Each Flagstone wrapper also closely replicates the prominent endcap color
on the KIND A&A Trade Dress, the KIND A&C Trade Dress, and the KIND AC Trade
Dress, respectively.
29.
30.
own healthy snack bars to retailers as a potential private label offering. In connection
with these efforts, Ragstone created a "sell-sheet" (see images below) depicting snack
Product Details
Ingredient*
31.
Product Benefits:
KIND notified Ragstone that the images Ragstone was using to market its
private label product infringed KIND's rights in its unique package, and Flagstone
confirmed that the images were concepts only, that it would immediately discontinue use
of each image in its marketing efforts, and that it would take KIND's concerns into
17
consideration in the future. In short, there is no doubt that Flagstone was fully aware of
KIND's rights and concerns since at least May of 2014. Despite its prior assurances,
Ragstone has now launched the NATURE'S HARVEST snack bars in infringing
packaging.
32.
will cause serious and irreparable harm to KIND. This conduct, if not enjoined, could
eviscerate the goodwill KIND has spent years carefully cultivating for its brand.
LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION
33.
Due to the striking similarity between the KIND Trade Dress in general,
the three Individual KIND Trade Dresses in particular, and the NATURE'S HARVEST
trade dress, there is a high likelihood that consumers will buy a NATURE'S HARVEST
bar under the mistaken belief that it comes from, is manufactured by, sponsored by, or is
associated or affiliated with, KIND.
34.
HARVEST bars compete directly with KIND products in the exact same channels of
commerce.
35.
HARVEST bars to compete directly with KIND bars because it has mimicked three of
KIND's most successful ingredient combinations, and has demonstrated its intention
18
NATURE'S HARVEST
Flagstone Sell-Sheet
Flavor
Flavor
Cranberry Almond
Cranberry Almond
Chocolate
Chocolate
Chocolate
KIND Flavor
Cashew
Cashew
Sea Salt
Sea Salt
Ragstone also highlights unique nutritional benefits and attributes that match the imitated
KIND flavor. For example, on its Cranberry Almond flavor, Ragstone calls out the
addition of "50% Daily Value of Antioxidant Vitamins A, C & E," which directly
matches the supplement and prominent "50% DV Antioxidants Vitamins A, C and E"
claim for the corresponding KIND bar.
36.
KIND, its products are not equivalent, as they use less expensive and lower quality
sweetening agents, use considerably more sodium, and retail for substantially less per
bar.
37.
Relatively low-cost snack items, including KIND bars (about $2 per bar),
are often impulse purchases. In that setting, deceptively similar trade dress is likely to
cause confusion. Confusion is further likely because consumers of these products are
more likely to rely on signals of familiarity contained in a product's trade dress and are
unlikely to exercise a great deal of care to ensure the source of the product before making
19
a purchase, risks that are particularly acute where a competitor seeks to mimic so many of
the signals consumers use as shortcuts in identifying a favored brand.
IRREPARABLE HARM
38.
Ragstone has adopted a trade dress for its NATURE'S HARVEST bar
products that is likely to confuse consumers into thinking they are buying a product that
comes from or is associated with KIND as the maker of KIND bars.
39.
HARVEST bars in their infringing trade dress, KIND will suffer irreparable harm. A
material proportion of consumers will mistakenly believe they are buying a KIND
product, or a private label product made, sponsored or approved by KIND, when they are
actually buying a Ragstone product. The goodwill that KIND has spent considerable
time, effort and resources to cultivate will be eroded. Existing KIND customers may be
disappointed with the quality of products that they mistakenly believe are made by
KIND, and therefore may turn away from KIND products. Potential new customers,
mistakenly thinking they are buying KIND products, may also be disappointed and
decide not to buy KIND bars in the future.
40.
private label market, Flagstone already enjoys broad distribution among many of the
nation's largest food retailers and, unless enjoined, has the apparent ability to flood
market channels with its confusingly similar product.
20
COUNT ONE
41.
KIND repeats and realleges each and every allegation in the foregoing
trade dress that is confusingly similar to the KIND Trade Dress (including the KIND
Shared Trade Dress, the KIND Registered Trade Dress, the KIND A&A Trade Dress, the
KIND A&C Trade Dress, the KIND CA+ Trade Dress, and the KIND PBDC+ Trade
Dress).
43.
great and irreparable injury to KIND and to the business and goodwill represented by the
KIND Trade Dress, in an amount that cannot be ascertained at this time, leaving KIND
44.
their NATURE'S HARVEST bar products in the present packaging constitutes false
designation of origin and infringement of the KIND Trade Dress in violation of Section
43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1125(a).
45.
Defendants, restraining them from any further acts of trade dress infringement, false
designation of origin and unfair competition, and, after trial, recovery of any damages (to
the extent calculable) proven to have been caused by reason of Defendants' aforesaid
acts.
21
COUNT TWO
46.
KIND repeats and realleges each and every allegation in the foregoing
48.
KIND repeats and realleges each and every allegation in the foregoing
The trade dress of KIND bars is federally registered with the United States
Patent and Trademark Office as Trademark Registration No. 3,882,221 (below on the
KIND
50.
51.
is confusingly similar to the trade dress of KIND bars, and Flagstone has already
commenced selling the NATURE'S HARVEST product in the market.
22
52.
NATURE'S HARVEST bar products thus is likely to cause confusion and mistake and to
deceive retailers and consumers as to the source, origin or sponsorship of these products.
Consumers seeing NATURE'S HARVEST bar products in the marketplace likely will
believe that they are sponsored by, associated with, or otherwise affiliated with KIND or
vice versa.
53.
confusingly similar trade dress would cause irreparable injury to both the sales and
reputation of KIND as well as the goodwill developed by KIND bar's trade dress. The
extent of this harm cannot be ascertained at this time, leaving KIND no adequate remedy
at law.
54.
connection with its NATURE'S HARVEST bar products constitute infringement of the
Registered KIND Trade Dress in violation of Section 32 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C.
1114.
55.
Defendants, restraining them from any further acts of trade dress infringement and, after
trial, recovery of any damages (to the extent calculable) proven to have been caused by
reason of Defendants' aforesaid acts.
COUNT FOUR
56.
KIND repeats and realleges each and every allegation in the foregoing
23
57.
58.
KIND repeats and realleges each and every allegation in the foregoing
violation of KIND's rights under the New York State common law, as preserved by N.Y.
Gen. Bus. Law 360-O.
COUNT SIX
60.
KIND repeats and realleges each and every allegation in the foregoing
62.
challenged trade dress is likely to dilute and detract from the distinctiveness of the KIND
Trade Dress.
63.
Defendants' acts of trade dress dilution, unless restrained, will cause great
and irreparable injury to KIND and to the business and goodwill represented by the
KIND Trade Dress, in an amount that cannot be ascertained at this time, leaving KIND
24
64.
with them (including, but not limited to, their officers, directors, agents, servants,
wholesalers, distributors, retailers, employees, representatives, attorneys, subsidiaries,
KIND's products or vice versa, and from otherwise acting in a way likely
to cause confusion, mistake or deception on the part of purchasers or
consumers as to the origin or sponsorship of such products; and
B.
with them (including, but not limited to, their officers, directors, agents, servants,
wholesalers, distributors, retailers, employees, representatives, attorneys, subsidiaries,
related companies, successors, assigns and contracting parties) take affirmative steps to
25
dispel such false impressions that heretofore have been created by their use of the
challenged trade dress, including, but not limited to, recalling from any and all channels
of distribution any and all infringing products and promotional materials.
C.
damages sustained by KIND, to the extent calculable, arising from the foregoing acts of
trade dress infringement and dilution, false designation of origin and deceptive acts and
practices.
D.
judgment for three times such profits or damages (whichever is greater), pursuant to
15 U.S.C. 1117 and N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law 349(h).
E.
That KIND have and recover its costs, including its reasonable
attorneys' fees and disbursements in this action, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117 and
N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law 349(h).
F.
the State of New York in view of Defendants' intentional and willful trade dress and
G.
in their possession or control and all means of making the same in accordance with 15
U.S.C. 1118.
H.
That Defendants file with the Court and serve on counsel for
KIND within thirty (30) days after entry of any injunction issued by the Court in this
action, a sworn written statement pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1116(a) setting forth in detail
26
the manner and form in which Defendants have complied with any injunction which the
Court may enter in this action.
I.
That KIND have such other and further relief as the Court may
KIND demands a trial by jury on all claims as to which a jury trial may be had.
Ivid H. Bernstein
(dhbernstein @debevoise.com)
Jyotin Hamid
(jhamid @debevoise.com)
Charles W. Baxter
(cwbaxter@debevoise.com)
919 Third Avenue
27