Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
- Mrunal - http://mrunal.org -
Sathasivam defends
Other CJIs do arbitration or consultation
work for corporates after retirement. (and
mint crores of rupees.) However, I was
planning to do farming at village. But
since President has offered this position,
Ive accepted. I never lobbied to get this
job.
Anti-arguments
Ex-CJI should not be made Governor because:
1. Independent judiciary is the basic feature of Constitution. But when Judges
seek jobs or a seat in Parliament from the Executive, this basic feature is not
http://mrunal.org/2014/09/current-judiciary-sepw1-sathasivam-governor-postponement-doctrine-urdu-official-language.html/print/
1/4
9/26/2014
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
fullfilled.
Promise of such post-retirement job can jeopardise the autonomy and
accountability of the judiciary.
This can create breach in balance of separation of powers.
After retirement judges get appointed to Lokpal, NHRC etc. but those
positions are eligibility requirements and autonomy in functioning.
Governors post is seen as an executive patronage- typical reserved for
retiring politicians.
Earlier retired judges of HC became governors. But this is the first time a
retired CJI, got this job!
Sathasivam was also a candidate for Lokpal job. So by giving him
Governorship, Modi took him out of the race.
Breach of protocol: In the order of precedence, 1st Prez, 2nd VP, 6th CJI,
8th: Governor outside their state. So, CJI should not accept such lower job.
It is beneath his dignity.
President
VP
PM
Governor in their respective states
Former presidents
5A.Dy.PM
6. CJI and Speaker of Loksabha
7. Leader of Opposition in LS and RS, and ~half dozen others (list not important for
the present topic)
7A: Holder of Bharat Ratna
8: Governors outside their state.
Pro-arguments
There is nothing wrong in CJI becoming governor because:
1. Post of governor is a constitutional post. SC is a constitional body.
2. Punchhi commission: Governorship should not be given to person active in
politics.
3. A Former CJI will be an expert in constitutional matters- provides him to
utilise his expertise in public service. This can be a healthy trend.
4. There is no breach of protocol if retired CJI accept a lesser post, because he
has retired.
5. President chose to accept the Modis proposal as there is no constitutional
bar in such appointment.
Suggested reforms
1. Tribunals and commissions should be manned by a separate cadre of judges.
(Instead of dolling out these jobs to retired judges- and opening floodgates
http://mrunal.org/2014/09/current-judiciary-sepw1-sathasivam-governor-postponement-doctrine-urdu-official-language.html/print/
2/4
9/26/2014
Doctrine of Postponement
2010: Home ministry made advisory on media reporting by police. But still
no proper regulation.
2012: SC said, Judiciary can impose a temporary freeze on media report- of a
particular case. IF such media-reporting is hurting the rights of the accused.
This is called Doctrine of Postponement
(at that time, it was silent on victim)
But, Excessive media coverage of crime and court proceeding =Victims
rights are jeopardized.
2014: some NGO files PIL.
SC says- Yes, Media has right to freedom of speech (#19) but Victim also has
right to live with dignity.(#21)
Therefore, SC appointed Gopal Sankarnarayan as amicus curiae, and has
sought responses from the Union, states and UTs about this issue.
3/4
9/26/2014
http://mrunal.org/2014/09/current-judiciary-sepw1-sathasivam-governor-postponement-doctrine-urdu-official-language.html/print/
4/4