Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
TECHNIQUES
Part II
April 16th , 2002
F. ANGHINOLFI
CERN
Francis.Anghinolfi@cern.ch
F. A. CERN/EP
Outline
From active components available in modern IC
technologies, to the examples of amplifiers design
used for High Energy Physics applications
Outline
4- Basic of amplifier
5- Differential amplifier
6- OTA
7- Two-stage differential amplifier
8- Other amplifiers circuits
9- Cascode circuits
10- Charge Sensitive Preamplifier
11- Transimpedance Preamplifier
12- Preamplifiers conclusions
F. A. CERN/EP
Feedback circuit
In
Amplifier
F. A. CERN/EP
A
= Closed Loop Gain
Out/In =
1 + A
Out
Stability is assumed if the Open Loop
Gain (A , complex number ) is far
away from -1
Q in = i(t)dt
Decay element
Rf
Integrating capacitor
Cf
Qin/Cf
i(t)
Vout =
Vout
Cd
Detector model
F. A. CERN/EP
Voltage decay
Amplifier
Q in
Cf
Vdet = Qin
-Qin
Cf
Qin
Cd
(~0)
Amplifier
F. A. CERN/EP
Cd
Cf
iin
Cd
vo
(~0)
Amplifier
F. A. CERN/EP
i in
vo =
s.C f
Frequency domain
iin
Cd
vo
Consider now a non-ideal amplifier, loaded with
capacitance Co :
(~0)
CO
vo
gm.R L
=
vin 1 + sC o .R L
Vdd
VbiasP
io
Vcas
Amplifier
vo
Vin
VbiasN
Gnd
F. A. CERN/EP
vin
gm.vin
RL Co
Co
iin
Cd
vo
(~0)
CO
Amplifier
vin Cd
Cf
gm.vin
RL CO
Cf
vin
1
=
i in
s(Cd + Cf)
F. A. CERN/EP
vo
gm.R L
=
vin 1 + s(Co + Cf).R L
9
vo
if
iin
Cd
vo
vin
iin
Cd
(~0)
vo
Cf
gm.vin
RL CO
Cf
CO
Amplifier
F. A. CERN/EP
Forward Gain
(A)
vo
gm.R L
1
=
.
i in 1 + s(Co + Cf).R L s(Cd + Cf)
Feedback Gain
()
if
= s.Cf
vo
10
vo
(~0)
Amplifier
CO
if
= A.
i in
In our case, the product A is :
gm.R L
Cf
A =
.
1 + s(Co + Cf).R L (Cd + Cf)
A is a one pole system, such that 1+A cannot be zero.
The charge preamplifier is difficult to make unstable
F. A. CERN/EP
11
vo
A
=
i in 1 + A
vo
(~0)
Amplifier
CO
vo
1
=
.
i in sCf
Ideal Integrator
response
F. A. CERN/EP
1
(Cd + Cf)(Co + Cf)
1+ s
gm.Cf
12
iin
Cd
vo
(Co + Cf)
Rin =
gm.Cf
(~0)
CO
Amplifier
vo
vo
1
1
=
.
i in sCf 1 + sRin.(Cd + Cf)
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
t
F. A. CERN/EP
13
Numerical values
iin
Cd
vo
(~0)
gm=0.003S
CO
Amplifier
vo
(Co + Cf)
Rin =
gm.Cf
1
0.8
0.6
gives
vo
1
1
=
.
i in sCf 1 + sRin.(Cd + Cf)
0.4
0.2
t (RC units)
F. A. CERN/EP
Rf
RfCf=500RinCin
0.8
0.6
Cf
0.4
0.2
iin
Cd
vo
10
15
20
10
15
20
RfCf=50RinCin
(~0)
0.8
0.6
CO
Amplifier
0.4
0.2
vo
1
Rf
1
=
.
.
i in sCf 1 + s.Rf.Cf 1 + sRin.(Cd + Cf)
RfCf=5RinCin
0.8
Ballistic deficit
0.6
Feedback RC
F. A. CERN/EP
Input node RC
0.4
0.2
10
15
20
15
RfCf=50RinCin
Cf
0.8
0.6
0.4
iin
Cd
vo
Instant charge
0.2
(~0)
CO
10
15
20
Amplifier
Ballistic deficit
0.8
0.6
vo
1
Rf
1
=
.
.
i in sCf 1 + s.Rf.Cf 1 + sRin.(Cd + Cf)
Feedback RC
F. A. CERN/EP
Input node RC
0.4
0.2
20
30
40
16
11 Transimpedance Preamplifier
(Qin = i(t)dt )
0
Vout(t) = R f .i in (t )
i(t)
Vout
Cd
Detector model
F. A. CERN/EP
Amplifier
17
11 Transimpedance Preamplifier
Rf
Frequency domain
iin
Cd
vo
(~0)
CO
Amplifier
gm.vin
RL Co
vo
gm.R L
=
vin 1 + sC o .R L
F. A. CERN/EP
18
11 Transimpedance Preamplifier
Frequency domain
Rf
iin
Cd
vo
(~0)
CO
Amplifier
vin Cin
Rf
gm.vin
RL CO
Rf
vin
Rf
=
i in 1 + s.Rf.Cin
vo
gm.Ro
=
vin 1 + s.Ro.Co
With Ro=Rf//RL
F. A. CERN/EP
19
vo
11 Transimpedance Preamplifier
Frequency domain
Rf
if
iin
Cd
vo
vin
iin
Cd
(~0)
vo
Rf
gm.vin
RL CO
Rf
CO
Amplifier
Feedback Gain ()
F. A. CERN/EP
vo
gm.Ro
Rf
(Ro=Rf//RL)
=
.
i in 1 + s.Co.Ro 1 + s.Rf.Cin
if
1
=
vo Rf
20
11 Transimpedance Preamplifier
Frequency domain
Rf
vo
(~0)
Amplifier
CO
if
= A.
i in
The open loop gain (product A) is :
gm.Ro
A =
(1 + s.Co.Ro)(1 + s.Cin.Rf)
(Ro=Rf//RL)
A has two poles, 1+A can be zero, and the closed loop circuit being unstable
The transimpedance preamplifier is difficult to make . stable
F. A. CERN/EP
21
11 Transimpedance Preamplifier
Frequency domain
Rf
vo
A
=
i in 1 + A
vo
(~0)
Amplifier
CO
vo
1
= Rf.
(1 + s.Ro.Co)(1 + s.Cin.Rf)
i in
1+
A0
Ideal transimpedance
response
F. A. CERN/EP
A0=gm.Ro
22
11 Transimpedance Preamplifier
Under the strong assumption that poles Cin/Rf.Ao
and Ro.Co are widely separated :
Rf
iin
Cd
vo
(~0)
CO
Amplifier
vo
1
Rf.
Cin.Rf
i in
(1 + s.
)(1 + s.Ro.Co)
A0
It can be shown that the input impedance of the
transimpedance preamplifier is given by :
Rf
Rin =
A0
vo
1
Rf .
i in
(1 + sRin.Cin)( 1 + sRo.Co)
F. A. CERN/EP
23
11 Transimpedance Preamplifier
Widely spaced poles
Rf
Numerical values :
iin
Cd
vo
(~0)
gm=0.001S
CO
Rf
Rin =
A0
Amplifier
vo
gives
Rin = 1Kohms
0.00012
0.0001
vo
1
Rf .
i in
(1 + sRin.Cin)( 1 + sRo.Co)
0.00008
0.00006
0.00004
0.00002
2 10 -7
4 10 - 7
6 10 - 7
8 10 - 7
1fC response
F. A. CERN/EP
1 10 - 6
Internal pole
Ro.Co= 3ns
24
11 Transimpedance Preamplifier
Widely spaced poles
Rf
Numerical values :
iin
Cd
vo
(~0)
gm=0.001S
CO
Amplifier
vo
0.0001
0.00008
vo
1
= Rf.
(1 + s.Ro.Co)(1 + s.Cin.Rf)
i in
1+
A0
0.00006
0.00004
0.00002
2 10 -7
4 10 - 7
6 10 - 7
8 10 - 7
1fC response
F. A. CERN/EP
1 10 - 6
t
25
11 Transimpedance Preamplifier
Example with some realistic numbers, fast preamplifier
Rf
vo
(~0)
gm=0.003S
CO
Amplifier
vo
0.001
0.00075
0.0005
0.00025
-0.00025
1 10
-7
2 10
-7
3 10
-7
4 10
-7
5 10
-0.0005
1fC response
F. A. CERN/EP
-7
vo
1
= Rf.
(1 + s.Ro.Co)(1 + s.Cin.Rf)
i in
1+
A0
The circuit is close to instability !
(equivalent input impedance 300 ohms, RinCin=7ns, RoCo=3ns
26
11 Transimpedance Preamplifier
Example with some realistic numbers, fast preamplifier
Cf
Rf
vo
(~0)
CO
Amplifier
Ao.(1 + s.Cf.Rf)
A =
(1 + s.Co.Ro)(1 + s.Cin.Rf)
(Ro=Rf//RL) and
A0=gm.Ro
Ao
A =
(1 + s.Cin.Rf)
F. A. CERN/EP
11 Transimpedance Preamplifier
Example with some realistic numbers, fast preamplifier
Cf
Rf
iin
Cd
vo
(~0)
CO
Amplifier
F. A. CERN/EP
vo
1
= Rf.
Cin.Rf
i in
(1 + s.Ro.Co)(1 + s.
)
Ao
28
11 Transimpedance Preamplifier
Cf
Rf
vo
gm=0.003S, Cf=0.1pF
(~0)
Rf
Rin =
A0
CO
Amplifier
vo
0.002
0.0015
0.001
0.0005
2 10 - 8
3 10 - 8
4 10 - 8
1fC response
F. A. CERN/EP
5 10 - 8
Rin = 350ohms
vo
1
Rf .
Rf
i in
(1 + s.
.Cin)(1 + sRo.Co)
Ao
1 10 - 8
gives
Internal pole
Ro.Co= 3 ns
29
12 Preamplifiers conclusions
Time constant
Charge Preamp
Transimpedance
>50ns
>5ns
100ohms range
Stability
Easy
Difficult
Gain
Q/Cf
Ballistic deficit
Time response
dependance
F. A. CERN/EP
30
12 Preamplifiers conclusions
Simplifications were done
for all the preceding
formulations:
We assumed main
amplifiers with one pole
only. In all cases, it is not
true and amplifiers should
be modeled with at least
two internal poles
The true closed loop gain
formulations are in general
complex. Spice
simulations are mandatory
to finalize the stability
issue and predict precisely
the transfer function
F. A. CERN/EP
Vdd
VbiasP
1 pole
Vcas
1 pole
vo
VbiasN
Co
Gnd
31
12 Preamplifiers conclusions
During the preamplifier
design discussions, we did
not considered :
.
F. A. CERN/EP
12 Preamplifiers conclusions
12 Preamplifiers conclusions