Sei sulla pagina 1di 75

The Design of Concrete-faced Rockfill

Dams

Danie Badenhorst
10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

Constructed Concrete-faced Rockfill


Dams

Height (m)

Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams: Trends


220
Uncompacted
Compacted
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

Year
10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

The Lesotho Mohale Dam

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

The Lesotho Mohale Dam

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

Description of CFRD
Parape
t Wall
Concrete
Face
Plinth

10/13/2005

Rockfil
l

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

Description of CFRD
Zone designations:

1 for soil materials

2 for processed granular materials

3 for rockfill zones

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

Section of CFRD

2B 3A

3A
3D
2B

2A

1B

3D
3B

1A

10/13/2005

3C

3E

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

Description of CFRD
Zone designations:

Zone 1A, a silt or fine sand act as face slab or perimeter


joint healer.
Zone 1B supports zone1 materials
Zone 2A is a processed fine filter < 20mm and will limit
leakage when a waterstop fails and can act to heal.

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

Description of CFRD

Zone 2B, The face support zone, is crusher run < 75mm

Zone 3 is quarry run rockfill. The differences in A,B and C are


principally in layer thickness and size and type of rock.

Zone 3A, provides compatibility and limit void size adjacent to


Zone 2B.
Zone 3B provides mass, resist the water load and helps in limiting
face deflection.
Zone 3C receives little water loading, and settlement is essentially
during construction. The two-metre-thick layer in Zone 3C accepts
large size rocks, is more economical to place and its lower
density saves rock volume.

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

Section of CFRD

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

10

Materials Specification
MATERIALS & COMPACTION DETAIL
Zone

Classification

Lift Height
(m)*

Type of Roller

Passes (Number)

1A

Impervious earthfill

0,3

Compaction by rubber tyre


equipment

1B

Random earthfill

0,6

Compaction by rubber tyre


equipment

2A

Fine filter

0,2

50 kN vibrator

2B

Crushed rock

0,4

> = 10 tonne vibratory roller

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

4***
4 + surface
compaction **

11

Materials Specification
MATERIALS & COMPACTION DETAIL
Zone

Classification

Lift Height
(m)*

Type of Roller

Passes
(Number

3A

Selected small quarry run


rock

0,4

>= 10 tonne vibratory


roller

3B

Quarry run rockfill

1,0

>= 10 tonne vibratory


roller

3C

Quarry run rockfill

2,0

>= 10 tonne vibratory


roller

3D

Erosion protection, durable


rock

NA

3E

Drainage rock

10/13/2005

1,0/2,0

Placed by
backhoe
> = 10 tonne vibratory
roller

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

12

Materials Specification

Maximum layer thickness after compaction.


**

Surface compaction by 130 kN vibratory plate on laser

controlled backhoe. Similar

compaction shall be achieved

as using: 2 passes with the 10 tonne vibratory roller without


and subsequently 4 passes downslope without and 4
passes upslope with vibration.

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

13

Materials Specification

Zone 2A material shall be thoroughly compacted with a


backhoe mounted plate vibrator with

at

least

50

kN

vibratory force to a density similar as achieved by 4 passes


using a 10 tonne

vibratory roller. Particular care shall be

taken to prevent damage to the concrete or to the


waterstops embedded in the plinth concrete. The
material shall be thoroughly wetted before

and

during

compaction.

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

14

Site Requirements

CFRDs are best suited to sites where:


rock foundation is close to plinth
nearby source of rockfill is available
lack of suitable core material
there is location for economical spillway

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

15

Features of a CFRD

Settlements of rockfill are small

Parapet wall can be placed on crest

Leakage is not a concern, face slab in biaxial compression,


rockfill stable without face slab

Water load transmitted into foundation upstream of dam axis

Uplift under rockfill is not involved. The pressure on the


foundation exceeds reservoir pressure over 3/4 of base width.

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

16

Features of a CFRD

Sliding factor for reservoir water and rockfill exceeds 7

High shear rockfill, no pore pressures in rockfill, small settlement


of rockfill under seismic load make CFRD resistant to seismic
loading

Drainage galleries in abutments not required

Overtopping can cause failure

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

17

Post Construction Crest Settlement


Damname
Rock type
Height (m)
Aguamilpa
Gravel
187
Tianshengqiao
Limestone and mudstone
178
Foz do Areia
Basalt
160
Segeredo
Basalt
145
Alto Anchicaya
Hornfels-Diorite
140
Xingo
Granite
140
Golillas
Gravel
130
Khao Laem
Limestone and mudstone
130
Ita
Basalt
125
Turimiquire
Limestone
115
R.D. Bailey
Sandstone and shale
96
Sugarloaf
Sandstone
85
Chengbing
Lava tuff
75
Minase
Liparite
76
Cabib Creek
Gneiss
64
Kangaroo Creek
Weak schist
60

10/13/2005

Settlement (mm)
340
1060
210
160
170
49
50
150
450
270
420
40
100
400
110
180

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

Settlement (% of height)
0.18
0.6
0.13
0.11
0.12
0.33
0.04
0.16
0.36
0.23
0.44
0.04
0.13
0.6
0.22
0.3

18

Height (m), Settlement (mm)

Post Construction Crest Settlement


1200
1000
800
Height (m)

600

Settlement (mm)

400
200
0
1

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

Dam or rock type

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

19

Disadvantages of CFRDs
z Plinth to be designed well where rock is poor.
z Care to be taken in fabrication and construction of waterstops.
Design movement on perimetric joint is 200 to 300mm.
z Further research required for joints and seals on joints for dams
higher than 200m

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

20

Advantages of CFRDs

Ancillary works shorter than for earthfill dams

Diversion capacity can be reduced by allowing overtopping of


rockfill

Rockfill is suitable for wet weather placement

Foundation clean-up required no hand-work except at plinth

Grouting can be done parallel to placement of rockfill

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

21

Advantages of CFRDs

Multistage construction of the rockfill embankment is possible

Slipforming provides rapid and economical method of face slab


construction

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

22

Plinth Foundation Preparation

The foundation is subdivided into three main parts:


The plinth foundation
The embankment foundation
The transition foundation between the two

10/13/2005

Last mentioned is a non-differential deformable base

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

23

Foundation Preparation

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

24

Plinth Foundation Preparation

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

25

Plinth layout

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

26

Plinth functions

Connects the face slab to the rigid rock

Act as a grout cap during grouting

provides a starting position for concrete face slab slipforming


equipment

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

27

Plinth section

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

28

Dimensioning plinth

Standardization of the slope and dimensions will reduce cost and


limit construction time

minimum plinth widths of 2m and 3m for <25m high and >25m


high dams respectively

Thickness for plinth on sound rock = face slab thickness.


Minimum 300mm and 500mm for lower and higher dams
respectively

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

29

Hydraulic gradient guide for plinth

Ratio of reservoir head to plinth width = hydraulic gradient

Foundation erodibility in terms of rock erosion/acceptable


hydraulic gradient
Fresh : 20
Slightly to moderately weathered : 10
Moderatelty to highly weathered : 5
Highly weathered : 2

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

30

Plinth Backfill Concrete

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

31

Orientation of the plinth apron

Apron contours normal to plinth line

Apron contours normal to dam axis

Apron contours to suit as-excavated contours

The alignment should always allow the concrete face to pull away
from the plinth and move downstream under water load.

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

32

Plinthline

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

33

Layout geometry in three dimensions

B
V

Plinth Control Point


10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

34

Plinth concrete and reinforcement

High durable, low permeability concrete

0,3% steel

anchored with grouted dowels

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

35

Face curb placing procedure

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

36

Face starter slab

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

37

Face thickness

H = 0,3 + 0,003H m

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

38

Slipform

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

39

Copper waterstop joint

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

40

Typical PVC Waterstop

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

41

Typical Stainless Steel waterstop joint

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

42

Copper waterstop joint

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

43

Plinth rubber and copper waterstop

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

44

Plinth rubber waterstop

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

45

Perimetric joint

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

46

Three dimensional perimeter joint


meter

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

47

Perimeter Joint Movement


Damname Rock type
Height ( Opening normal to joinSettlement normal to concrete fShear parallel to joint
Aguamilpa
Gravel
187
19
16
5
16
23
7
Tianshengqestone and mudst 178
Foz do Arei
Basalt
160
23
55
25
Salvajina
Gravel
148
9
19
15
Alto AnchicaHornfels-Diorite
140
125
106
15
Xingo
Granite
140
30
34
0
Golillas
Gravel
130
100
36
0
5
8
0
Khao Laemestone and mudst 130
Shiroro
Granite
125
30
60
21
Dolerite
122
7
70
0
Lower Piem
Reece
Dolerite
122
7
70
0
Cethana
Quartzite
110
11
0
7
Kotmale
Charnokite
97
2
20
5
Xibeikou
Dolomite
95
14
25
5
Murchison
Rhiolite
89
12
10
7
Sugarloaf
Sandstone
85
9
19
24
MacIntosh
Graywacke
75
5
20
3
Bastyan
Graywacke
75
5
21
0
Chengbing
Lava tuff
75
13
28
20
Gravel
40
2
12
1
Pichi-Picun-

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

48

Perimeter Joint Movement


200

H e ig h t (m )
175
150

O p e n in g
n o rm a l t o jo in t
(m m )

125
100

S e t t le m e n t
n o rm a l t o
c o n c re t e fa c e
(m m )
S h e a r p a ra lle l
t o jo in t (m m )

75
50
25
0
P e r d a m m e n t io n e d in t a b le

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

49

Joint meter

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

50

Face slab: temperature??

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

51

Plinth and face slab joints

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

52

Waterstops

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

53

Placement of rockfill

Rockfill is end dumped on the edge of a placed layer and spread


by dozer. There is inherent segregation in the dumping and
intentional segregation in the spreading. The smooth surface on
top of the layer is desirable for compaction and for reduced tyre
and dozer track costs. The top half consists of smaller size rock
and is well graded in comparison to the larger rocks in the bottom
half. The upper half is of higher density. Energy is transmitted
through the larger rocks providing strength and density by
wedging and crushing of edges. Water is added during
compaction to smooth the edges and to increase the density.

The maximum size rock in a layer may be equal to the layer


thickness. Immediately adjacent rockfill will not be fully
compacted and does not need to be. The larger rock particles will
attract load in the area.

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

54

Rockfill and Cohesionless fines

2A
3A
CF

2B
3B

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

55

Zone 2A compaction

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

56

Requirements of Zone 2A material

Non plastic mixture of rock fragments with hard durable particles

Designed as a filter - must retail silt and fine sand, (D15/d85<4)

Filter material must be more permeable than the clogged filter


interface, (D15/d15>4)

To achieve the above 2A material will

not segregate during placement, uniform -not change in gradation during processing
not have cohesion or will cement
be eternally stable
have the ability to control and seal a concentrated leak

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

57

Functions of Zone 2B material

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

58

Requirements of Zone 2B material

It forms a cushion to uniformly support the face slab

It must provide a smooth dense surface on which to place the


face slab to reduce concrete quantities

It restricts leakage flows that might result from damage to the


concrete face

Under draw down conditions is free draining through the


downstream rockfill

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

59

Requirements of Zone 2B material

In case of weak rockfills, measures as flattening the upstream


slope or providing drainage downstream of the transition zones
may be a requirement

Must be designed as self healing in case of a crack in the face


slab

Permeability>10-4 cm/s

Must be protected against erosion during construction

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

60

Requirements of Zone 3A material

The transition between 2B and 3B consists of 3 to 4m wide zone


3A material

it provides filter stability between the zones and

ensure limiting differential movement of the face slab

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

61

Segragated 3B Material

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

62

Requirements of Zone 3B and 3C


material

Capable of carrying the imposed reservoir load

10-2 to 10-1 cm/s for 3B and 3C respectively

3B - 1m layers, water added during compaction

3C - 2 m layers, water not added during compaction

Shear strength varies from about 450 for low density poorly
graded weak particles to 600 for high density, well graded strong
particles

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

63

Seggregated 3B material

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

64

Series of filters/seals of perimeter joint

Zone 1A and Zone 2A material

Cohesionless fines

top stainless steel waterstop

Central PVC waterstop

Bottom copper waterstop

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

65

Series of filters/seals of perimeter joint

Zone 2A fine filter material

Zone 2B transition filter material

Zone 3A small quarry run material

Zone 3B rockfill

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

66

Plinth-cohesionless fines

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

67

Placement of impervious 1B blanket on


face slab and fly ash on perimeter joint

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

68

Upstream Coffer Dam, Plinth

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

69

Downstream cofferdam

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

70

Parapet wall connected to face slab

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

71

Parapet Wall Functions

Provide freeboard
act as wave wall
provide access during construction of face slab
to provide safety barrier on crest

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

72

Parapet Wall

Heights up to 8.5m have been successfully constructed

Stability regarding shear and overturning important

Seismic loads must be considered - the crest of an embankment


dam is moving maximum during the occurrence of earthquakes

CFRDs can easily be raised by adding a parapet wall

Finish of parapet wall is important - the wall is visible after


completion and impoundment

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

73

Snowy conditions

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

74

CFRD

Simple

Safe

10/13/2005

SANCOLD/US 2005: The Design of


Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams

75

Potrebbero piacerti anche