Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
SOCIETIES EMERGING
FROM CONFLICT
INPROL Consolidated Response (07-007)
With contributions from Gary Hill, Mike Runnels, Gareth Davies, J. O’ Neil G. Pouliot,
Donald Stolworthy, Paul Woodward, Fraser Bryans.
Submitted by: Peter Chege, United Nations Mission in the Democratic Republic of
Congo (MONUC)
This query was referred to INPROL by the United Nations Department of Peacekeeping
Operations which originally received the query through its own discussion forum.
INPROL cross-posted the query to its Rule of Law Discussion Forum and obtained
responses that have been used to compile this consolidated response. The full text of
responses can be found at http://www.inprol.org/node/2349. INPROL invites further
comment by members.
Note: All opinions stated in this consolidated response have been made in a personal
capacity and do not necessarily reflect the views of particular organizations. INPROL
does not explicitly advocate policies.
INPROL is a project of the United States Institute of Peace with facilitation support from the Center of Excellence for
Stability Police Units, the Pearson Peacekeeping Centre, and the Public International Law & Policy Group.
PRISON SECURITY IN SOCITIES EMERGING FROM CONFLICT
Background:
One of the immediate challenges in restoring peace and stability in a society striving to
emerge from conflict is developing a prison security system that both prevents prison
inmates from escaping and protects corrections officers. The issues that need to be
addressed often include inexperienced, untrained and poorly paid prison staff who do
not have appropriate weapons and equipment, the lack of secure prison buildings and
infrastructure, and a shortage of furnishings and other resources. Security measures
must be urgently implemented to establish an adequate level of prison security that
meets international human rights standards and can be developed and sustained by a
new government with competing funding priorities.
Query:
Is there a template that can be used in the short-term to develop a prison security
system in a post-conflict environment? If not, what steps can corrections professionals
take to develop and implement security measures in prisons as quickly as possible?
Response Summary:
There are a number of steps that corrections professionals can take to improve prison
security, both in terms of securing the available physical infrastructure and developing
appropriate security procedures. Reforms should only be undertaken after a careful and
comprehensive assessment has been made of the prison system. This should include
national prison law; existing infrastructure; a profile of current prison staff; and a review
of existing practices, procedures, and government policies for the prison system. An
approach to prison management that includes a security strategy, tailored to the specific
context, including existing and prospective resources, can then be developed.
Prison Infrastructure:
Site Analysis and Selection1: The existing or planned prison site will need to be
evaluated in terms of its location, proximity to essential services, and suitability for long-
term use.
1
These issues are also discussed in detail in the International Corrections and Prisons Association’s
(ICPA) “Practical Guidelines for the Establishment of Correctional Services within UN Peace Operations”
and “Corrections Facilities Needs Assessment and Master Planning Manual” as well as the “Prison
Support Guidance Manual” produced by the United Nations Department of Peacekeeping Operations, all
of which can be found in the Compilation of Resources section below).
Security problems can arise when these considerations are not addressed. According to
an INPROL member who had worked with the UN Mission in Haiti from 1994-6, an initial
survey of the prisons system revealed serious problems, including the lack of records of
prisoners and the reason for their incarceration. Prisoners were fed by their families
(who could barely feed themselves) and, in some areas, men, women and children were
kept in the same cell with no sanitation, other than a steel barrel. These conditions
caused serious health problems and created an unstable environment which made
violence between prisoners and rioting more likely. The UN peacekeeping operation was
able to assist the national penitentiary authority to arrange on a short-term basis for
NGOs to supply food in Port au Prince which was delivered by UN Pol to some prisons.
The food was delivered on a daily basis to reduce the likelihood of its consumption by
anyone other than prisoners.
(b) The "onion" concept. The onion concept (a series of ring barriers around the
accommodation envelope) is the simplest method for basic security in a hostile
environment. One ring is the minimum, three rings is optimal. This will usually involve
some reinforcement of existing buildings. A locking schedule must be devised for the
single point of entry (which is controlled by a person who has a secure station outside
the accommodation envelope). Within the accommodation envelope, the prisoners’ cells
or living compound should have secure integrity separated as far as possible from the
perimeter of the accommodation envelope. Buildings need to be at least five meters from
a perimeter ring fence to prevent crossings between buildings. The perimeter rings need
to be five meters apart. The outer ring should have some screening to prevent view into
the prison.
The outer rings can be improvised with razor wire which should be at least three coils
high and picketed with angle iron. The coils need to be connected and pinned to the
ground. Each ring should have a single entry point capable of allowing vehicle access. It
should not be possible to compromise the gates at the same time (i.e. they should not be
in line). The outer ring should have a vehicle holding area (an anti-Trojan Horse
measure).
Another potential “quick” solution is to use strategically placed towers (which can be
constructed of wood using local labor) and to find donors to provide portable toilets,
showers, medical tent/units, generators, and mobile kitchens. The few cells needed for
maximum-security offenders can be purchased or built from shipping containers.
Containers can be converted into safe, secure and humane cells.
(d) Use of Formed Police Units (FPUs). At the inception of a mission, if no local
capacity exists to provide external security for prisons, FPUs could be used. When
involved in the protection of fixed locations, no less than a “section” (10 police officers)
should be employed. FPUs should not be used for internal security, however, since this
task requires special skills, equipment, and procedures.
A Special Weapons and Tactics capacity for interventions in correction facilities in case
of riots or hostage taking may also be needed. It may be preferable to invest in reliable
communications equipment and to work out a formal arrangement with qualified police or
military units (host nation or international peacekeeping forces) to establish a quick
Security procedures:
To minimize security risks while broader development of the prison system is taking
place, a number of immediate steps can be taken.
Vetting and Recruitment of New Prison Staff: One of the first steps is to discuss with
national authorities the need to vet existing staff and recruit new employees.
(a) Conducting Background Checks. The most important initial vetting needs to occur
with existing prison staff, especially at the senior and middle management levels. The
buy-in, comprehension, and support for change from upper management and prison
directors is critical if permanent, meaningful changes are to be made.
(d) Special Issues. Attention should be given to ensuring that the host nation’s ethnic
profile is reflected in recruitment outcomes and that the recruitment of women is actively
encouraged. In situations in which women or certain groups have been denied
educational and work opportunities under previous regimes, differing recruitment
qualifications may be necessary. Cultures that do not have a tradition of women working
in prison systems will benefit from the development of targeted strategies such as:
• utilizing the Gender Unit to develop strategies and materials to assist recruitment
efforts (e.g. materials developed for recruitment for other mission components,
background information on local culture and customs relating to women working
in the security sector);
• engaging the Public Information Office Unit of the mission in designing and
implementing an information program that targets women;
• liaising with the Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration team to recruit
demobilized women.
Staff retention may be enhanced by establishing support groups that include new female
recruits and current staff.
It is also likely that the national staff will be poorly paid. Corrections advisors should
provide national staff with consistent information concerning the relationship between the
host country economy and funding arrangements, so that salary levels will sustainable.
Having the central agency responsible for setting public sector salaries address staff
meetings can also be a useful strategy.
(b) Training Programs. Either the host nation or donors will have to have sufficient
resources, such as training equipment and venues, to provide meaningful training.
Often, the most effective method is to bring in a new cadre of prison staff that is free
from the institutional problems that plagued the old system, train them appropriately and
then begin rotating them into the existing cadre. This method allows for “clean” vetting
and a training environment free from the system demands to deploy and alleviates the
strain on the system to release staff for training. Once the new staff are deployed, the
next step is to begin vetting and retraining the old staff.
Full training programs (including lesson plans) have been developed by the ICPA. (The
ICPA Basic Training Manual for Correctional Workers is listed in the Compilation of
Resources section below.)
Unannounced prison searches: Prison staff are responsible for conducting regular and
intermittent searches of prisoners and prisons. These searches are conducted either at
regular and random intervals or in response to specific information. Searches by prison
staff are used to prevent prisoner escape and involvement in criminal activities while
searches by independent oversight bodies are intended to deter prisoner abuse by staff.
National prison legislation, policy and procedures are required to empower prison staff
and independent oversight to conduct such searches. International Human Rights
monitors could act as ex-officio members of independent inspections teams and could
be charged with helping to train independent inspectors.
Compilation of Resources:
This Consolidated Response draws from many of the following resources which are
useful reference tools for rule of law practitioners. All listed documents are uploaded to
the INPROL Digital Library.
United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (1955)
European Prison Rules (1987)
United Nations Body of Principles for the Protection of All Persons under Any Form of
Detention or Imprisonment (1988)
United Nations Basic Principles for the Treatment of Prisoners (1990)
United Nations Rules for the Protection of Juveniles Deprived of their Liberty (1990)
Other resources
Standard Forms
Note: All opinions stated in this consolidated reply have been made in a personal
capacity and do not necessarily reflect the views of particular organizations.
INPROL does not explicitly advocate policies.