Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Contents
1 Handover types & algorithms ................................................................................................................... 1
2 Main causes of handover failure............................................................................................................... 5
3 Flows of problem handling........................................................................................................................ 7
4 Typical cases ............................................................................................................................................... 9
4.1 Low handover success rate due to frequency interference................................................................ 9
4.2 Low handover success rate due to hardware malfunction................................................................. 9
4.3 Low handover success rate due to hardware malfunction............................................................... 10
2.
3.
4.
5.
2.
3.
Inter-cell handover between cells in different BSCs under the same MSC;
(inter-BSC handover)
4.
If handover is between cells under the same BTS, there is no need to send TA
TimeAdvancevalue to BSC before of after the handover. This kind of handover is
referred as synchronous handover. All other handovers which require GSM system to
measure TA value before and after the handover are referred as asynchronous
1
handover.
Main handover algorithms are as follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Directed retry;
7.
Fast-fading level;
8.
Macro-micro handover;
9.
When MS receives Handover Command in original cell, it will try to access into the
target cell according to information carried by Handover Command. If the access
succeeds, MS will send Handover Complete message at target cell; if it fails, the MS
2
will return to the original cell and send Handover Failure message; if the MS doesnt
return to the original cell, it means its disconnected with the network and call drop
happens due to handover failure.
2.
Coverage problem: if the coverage overlap between target cell and original cell
isnt large enough, handover may fail due to failing to occupy TCH in target cell.
In this case, its not probably for the MS return to the original cell;
3.
4.
BTS hardware malfunction: CDU fault; carrier fault; clock generator fault;
internal communication cable fault;
5.
6.
Check if radio parameters are set reasonably: if Co-BCCH and BSIC exist
among adjacent cells; if handover parameters are reasonably set; if external cell
data configured right; adjust the unreasonably-set parameters;
2.
Check indicators like BER, idle interference band etc. to reduce or eliminate
radio interference;
3.
Check coverage through DT. For bad coverage or areas without enough
overlapped coverage between original cell and target cell, checking of hardware
malfunction is very necessary for improving coverage; transceiver, clock
generator,
4.
Check cell hardware, including CDU, RF connection lines between boards, and
change hardware with faults;
5.
Check antenna system, including VSWR, direction of antennas in the same cell,
wrong installation or reversed installation of antenna feeders, make necessary
adjustment and changes.
4 Typical cases
4.1 Low handover success rate due to frequency interference
Problem description
The data in performance report shows Cell2 under a BTS suffer from low handover
success rate.
Problem analysis
Check radio parameters, its discovered that CI 29992 and 16953 in the cell share
channel and BSIC, and they are close to each other.
Problem solution
Change BCCH of 29992. After parameter adjustment, indicators are improved, and the
problem is solved.
Total
Date
BTS name
Cell LAC(LAC-CI)
Total
number of number of
handover
handover
request
success
Handover
success
rate (%)
2005-05-28 18:00-19:00
SITE1_DV2
LAC8412-CI29992
70
27
38.57
2005-05-29 18:00-19:00
SITE1_DV2
LAC8412-CI29992
43
18
41.86
2005-05-30 18:00-19:00
SITE1_DV2
LAC8412-CI29992
66
18
27.27
2005-06-15 18:00-19:00
SITE1_DV2
LAC8412-CI29992
25
24
96
2005-06-16 18:00-19:00
SITE1_DV2
LAC8412-CI29992
25
25
100
Problem solution
After the carrier is replaced, indicators are apparently improved and the problem is
solved.
Total
Date
Site name
Cell LAC(LAC-CI)
number of
handover
request
Total
number Handover
of
success
2005-06-10 18:00-19:00
SITE2_D1A
LAC8415-CI25023
345
52
15.1
2005-06-11 18:00-19:00
SITE2_D1A
LAC8415-CI25023
221
64
29
2005-06-12 18:00-19:00
SITE2_D1A
LAC8415-CI25023
266
28
10.5
2005-06-14 18:00-19:00
SITE2_D1A
LAC8415-CI25023
160
152
95
2005-06-15 18:00-19:00
SITE2_D1A
LAC8415-CI25023
160
154
96.3
Site name
Total
number of number of
handover
handover
request
success
Handover
success
rate (%)
LAC8416-CI25405
520
113
21.73
LAC8416-CI25405
517
102
19.72
LAC8416-CI25405
576
97
16.84
10
Chapter 4
Typical cases
LAC8416-CI25405
277
272
98.19
LAC8416-CI25405
297
261
87.87
11