Case Study

Kent Chemicals
..

CONTENTS
1. Introduction:.........................................................................................................................................................4
1.1 Background of kent chemicals:......................................................................................................................4
1.2 The Problem at Kent Chemicals:...................................................................................................................4
2. Restructuring at kent chemicals:..........................................................................................................................5
2.1 Earlier restructuring at the Company:............................................................................................................5
2.2 Corrective Measures for the Failed Restructuring:........................................................................................6
A) Solution by Gbds and its disappointment:-.................................................................................................6
B) Solution by World Boards and its disappointment:-...................................................................................7
CONCLUSION................................................................................................................................................8
3. Analysis and Discussions:....................................................................................................................................9
3.1 SWOT Analysis:.............................................................................................................................................9
Strengths:..........................................................................................................................................................9
Weaknesses:...................................................................................................................................................10
Opportunities:.................................................................................................................................................11
Threats:...........................................................................................................................................................12
SWOT Analysis on Kent Chemicals:.............................................................................................................13
4. Conclusions:.......................................................................................................................................................15
5. Recommendations:.............................................................................................................................................18

1. INTRODUCTION:

1.1 BACKGROUND OF KENT CHEMICALS:

In the year 1917, Kent Chemicals was founded as a company that produced rubber by the
Fisher family who owned the majority stake in the company. (Bartlett & Winig, 2012)
Because of abroad acquisitions, extensions and expanded deals, Kent Chemical had turned
into a main worldwide claim to fame chemical organization; a multi-headed hydra with $2.2
billion incomes in 2007. Through serious Research and Developments and various key
innovations, the organization had created a reasonable product offering including shopper,
fire security and medicinal plastics items. Never the less, the choice of changing Kent from
an organization of US that dallies in the global markets into an organization practically
contending that is focused on the creation, making and offering of completely being turned
into a top most requirement in the year of 1998, when Ben Fisher got the opportunity of
becoming a CEO of the company. For actualizing the vision related to a worldwide
incorporated company, Morales named by Fisher, a 22 year old veteran of Ken had ended up
being turned into the supervisor of the nation for heading the international division of the
products of Kent Chemical.
1.2 THE PROBLEM AT KENT CHEMICALS:
The rapid development of the abroad business had likewise prompted a few difficulties that
expected to be stood up to by Morales as a major aspect of his exceptional task. In the first
place, Morales was worried that the association fail to offer the correct reaction to changing
weights and requests. Case in point, the reporting of corporate frameworks that had been
intended for concentrating on the varying divisions of the association had resulted in being
turned into a wellspring of strain taking place amongst them. There had been no need for

taking after regular strategy in capital portion, money related reporting and target setting to
specify simply a couple.
The second concern originated from the abroad backups' long history of freedom that
prompted security of re-directions toward oneself by supervisors. Therefore, it got to be hard
to coordinate abroad operations techniques as parochial disposition won.
Thirdly, it had been found by Morale that the association of territory within his own global
division did not seem to be having a viewpoint spread across the globe.
2. RESTRUCTURING AT KENT CHEMICALS:

2.1 EARLIER RESTRUCTURING AT THE COMPANY:

Morales for Kent Chemical had ended up leaving the system of rebuilding by the president.
Essentially, there had been handling of accompanying problems in the project that are as
follows:

The execution of new framework that had been done by the Kent Chemicals resulted
in constraining the individuals for taking after the regular procedure in the reports of

budget, setting of target, allotment of capital and many more.

These choose to be having an autonomy related to the auxiliaries, with the goal that
these could be dealing with the specific business organization within their own style

for drawing out the stretching of duration.

Coordinating the nearby problems, particularly for each and every extension as well
as headquarter. For each and every neighborhood wing dealing with the problems
focusing across the skills. In accordance to this, the staff that work within the wing of
neighborhood had been showing reluctance speaking with the offices across the globe
and the organizations at inter- level.

2.2 CORRECTIVE MEASURES FOR THE FAILED RESTRUCTURING:

There has been advertisement of two different types of arrangements. For beginning with the
setup of International Board Director in the year 2006 along with the creation of the World
Board as a practice of rebuilding in the year 2007.

A) SOLUTION MADE BY GBDS AND THE DISAPPOINTMENT FOLLOWED

BY IT:Morales help in diagnosing the problem and edited the International Board Directors, the
president at the organization of Kent Chemicals, which consisted of three different executives
who had been deputed for the enhancement of correspondence amongst the offices across the
globe with an headquarter in the United States of America, along with closer extension
locales of the business.

DIFFICULTIES AND FAILURE OF GBD

It had been expected by the president that each and every chief from the gathering of Global
Board Directors would result in the enhancement of corresponding levels within three regions
of center business, energizing closer places of work for taking after the operational
techniques across the globe. There had been approval of Global Board Directors for dealing
with each and every part of the business within the district, yet due to the deficiencies in the
closer learning, they could not be performing in an effective manner. The administration
result an exercise of input whereby approach had been made by them towards the staff of
neighborhood for picking up style of concentration, yet the Global Board Directors were to
flounder in order to receive this particular style. The Global Board Directors had been

fizzling for a long duration of time. There had been certain explanation with respect to this
disappointment, for an instance, information of neighborhood, meddling and correspondence
problems being absent in the closer operations.

B) SOLUTION STATED BY WORLD BOARDS AND THE DISAPPOINTMENT

FOLLOWED BY IT:Resulting towards the most increasingly bad lessons understood by the organization of Kent
Chemicals from the defects of Global Board Directors, they seem to be securing the World
Boards for helping the Global Board Directors for taking within the closer information. There
had been an inclusion of masters from the limbs of neighborhood by the World Board. In
consideration with the other side of the coin, due to the creation of the antagonistic picture
through the local individuals for the Global Board Directors, the administrators of
neighborhood at the Kent Chemicals had been showing reluctance towards the thoughts being
proposed towards the World Banks.

LAST SOLUTION
Within the duration of one duration of year from the statement of disappointment, the
organization of Kent Chemicals chose to be utilizing specialist related to the grounds that it
had been basic for fortifying the structure of authority. Arrangements provided by the
consultants of Kent, Sterling Partners, as a matter of fact with Kent Chemicals, there had
been an involvement of genuine issues related to administration and had contributed to show
low execution, their firm of consultancy, dissection of the situation had been done by Sterling
Partners and resulted in propelling a program of redesigning. Within this particular projects,
an association of lattice had been a setup for realigning the correspondence in an easy and

proficient manner. This would be mixing the directions across the globe, and closer prerequisite altogether. A significant change as an alternate seems to be leaving region of
operation in each and every line of business would be changing. As a matter of fact, the
division in the items for customer had contributed in maintaining the focus of their business
across the needs of client, as the organization of Kent Chemicals required to be complying
with the laws for the assurance of flame in each and every countries of operation, thus the
insurance items of the blaze had been restricted. As a point of conclusion, the plastic division
of medicines seems to be overseen by being united across the globe and closer operations
being followed by the principle consumers had been multinational corporations which
seemed to be having the capacity for supplying each and every item being included. All of
these revamping of rebuilding still could not consist the most testing and pressing problem
confronted by the company of Controls of International Headquarters on the areas of limb.

CONCLUSION

It had been investigated by the advisors that the key issue at KCI was developed by the
involvement of their techniques and their structures like an organization of a small size. They
gave three encourages to strategize:-

1. KCI ought to present - nearby and territorial organization,

2. restorative plastics business ought to be facilitated universally, and

3. flame control items ought to be overseen territorially since the nation regulations vary in
every nation. They likewise prescribed to utilize "choice network" to diagram their choice
process and location their proprietorship issues obviously.
3. ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSIONS:

3.1 SWOT ANALYSIS:

A few scientific classifications of the substance of differing qualities had been presented for
depicting the clusters involved in personal credits related to the enthusiastic feeling amongst
the scientists (e.g., Jehn, Northcraft & Neale, 1999; Milliken & Martins, 1996). As emulated
by Jackson et al's. (1995) scientific categorization, separated amongst the assignment of
qualities situated in relation and related to it; and also promptly noticeable and basic
properties. A relations-situated difference incorporates demographics, for example, age,
gender as well as racial and ethnic backgrounds which may shape interpersonal connections
however generally don't have immediate bearing on execution. Undertaking focused assorted
qualities reflects credits which are prone to be identified with information, abilities and
capacities required in the work environment (i.e., capacity, residency, training). Ordinarily,
perceivable characteristics, for example, age gender etc. have been considered representations
of a singular's qualities, convictions and demeanor (Fiske, 1993). From a lawful viewpoint
these characteristics additionally speak to secured classifications and are in this way of
investment to associations meaning to follow Title VII law. As of late there has been a
developing enthusiasm for other noticeable characteristics on the grounds that they are
considered to be in relation with the learning associated with work, practices and their
mentality. Also, there seems to be a resurrection (cf. Haythorn, 1968; Hoffman, 1959) of
enthusiasm for the influences of basic properties, for example, identity and mentality. Some

of the studies had contributed in fusing measurements of Big Five related to identity,
attitudinal variations or varying measures for profoundness or basic qualities being assorted.

STRENGTHS:
Investigations of promptly located, relations-situated differences prevail observational take a
shot at working environment differences. The rich hypothetical foundation advertised by
social character hypothesis and social arrangement hypothesis outlines a number of these
explorations. Social hypothesis of personality has been used for anticipating and
comprehending how diversity influences particular state of conduct and mind, additional to
the motion of group. To clarify the impacts of differences on individual results, the essential
contention is that one's likeness on obvious and moderately changeless attributes impacts
emotions of distinguishing proof within gatherings, ID on the basis of likeliness in
demographics has a connection with in-gathering predispositions and group clash. By
broadening the rationale of speculations that clarify singular state of mind and conduct,
differences analysts have discovered a solid hypothetical basis for making forecasts about
how differing qualities is prone to impact social techniques inside groups and associations
(e.g., Jehn et al., 1999; Pelled, Eisenhardt & Xin, 1999). Albeit hypothesis of social character
and social order had been created initially for clarifying the influences of promptly located
differing qualities, a few researchers have utilized these speculations to clarify the impacts of
identity and quality based differing qualities.

WEAKNESSES:
Along with the special cases related to the hypothesis of social character and social order, a
large portion of the contentions offered to clarify the impacts of promptly identified
characteristic assorted qualities expect that promptly identified characteristics are connected

with basic traits, which thus, drive conduct. Case in point, clarifications for the impacts of
social differences have indicated the behavioral associates of social qualities and their
imaginable ramifications for individual practices that may impact group execution. For
specialists who have been studying the top administration groups, a typical degree of
contention is that promptly caught differing qualities reflects cognitive differences, which
thusly impacts group choices furthermore therefore firm execution. Notwithstanding
convincing supplications for analysts to gauge the hidden differing qualities that is so key to
this line of thinking (Lawrence, 1997), such examination stays rare. Late hypothetical
commitments towards the field need a methodology of multiple dimension for the
characterization of basic differences. It appears to be that there are chances of social methods
along with their results are influenced through the complex juncture of assorted qualities
measurements, not disconnected measurements of differences. A colleague of Research and
Development may be distinguishing herself and apart from this her colleagues utilizing
different characteristics (e.g., "Asian male researcher" or "White female architect"). The
results of the group might be controlled by the setup of demographic profiles or character
profiles of the colleagues (Frable, 1997). Reasonably, it seems to be boding well that the
varying qualities of trait profiles had looked for inside groups that is liable for impacting the
results in groups and individuals. Lamentably, differing qualities specialists had not yet been
successful to handle the tests related to observationally evaluating multiple dimensions of
assorted qualities.

OPPORTUNITIES:
The former discourse proposes a few open doors for the recently conducted and the future
researches. One opportunity with huge clarity is focused on fusing the parts of differences
and variations that had been underrepresented. Case in point, in the event that overall clashes

ends up making religion highly remarkable inside the United States of America, this may
seem to be having the crucial results to work for the elements of the environment. Besides,
analyzing religious differences might expand the worldwide importance of differences
examination directed within the United States of America. It seems to fascinating to observe,
for instance, that the national enumeration in nation of Ireland identifies the population of
individuals with each of a few affiliations in religion, however it seems to be no endeavor for
evaluating ethnicity and racism. On the other hand, the evaluation of US utilizes various
classes to portray ethnicity yet it doesn't evaluate religion. Counting measures of basic
differing qualities and in addition promptly distinguished differences is an alternate
opportunity for picking up newinsights. The potential estimation of this approach was
exhibited within a study that contributed in evaluating both attitudinal differences and sexual
orientation (Harrison et al., 2002). The results contributed in recommending that promptly
discovered assorted qualities impacted group working when groups had little experience
together, yet over the long haul basic assorted qualities was more compelling. In spite of the
fact that the quantity of studies considering basic assorted qualities is still little, such research
appears encouraging. Notwithstanding investigations conducted for the differences in
attitude, one plans on seeing a new research related to the differences in choice/ cognitive
styles being made (Simons et al., 1999), social qualities, identity, along with mental models.
New hypothetical advancements may likewise enhance to understand the differences in
elements.
Majority of the researches have been embracing the methodology of mentality, by the
application of social mental hypotheses for example, social personality hypothesis and social
classification hypothesis to comprehend the impacts of work environment assorted qualities.
Counting hypotheses of sociology related to clash and rivalry. What's more financial

speculations of work markets (e.g., Blau, 1977) would without a doubt advance our
understanding of assorted qualities motion.

THREATS:
Notwithstanding analyst's concentrated endeavors to gauge differences and foresee its results,
the writing offers few convincing discoveries about the impacts of assorted qualities in the
working environment. Absence of a typical standard will make it hard to collect practically
identical discoveries over time, while understanding around a few issues could quicken our
capacity to gain from the collecting proof. One valuable component of a typical ideal model
would include guaranteeing that examinations are led to control for focal propensity sythesis
when evaluating the influences of differences in composition. Within the specific conditions,
measures related to difference are influenced by the values of mean along with scattering
(Bedeian & Mossholder, 2000). Moreover, there is some proof that focal propensity and
scattering based measures of assorted qualities can have one of a kind consequences for
group execution (Barrick et al., 1998; Thomas, 1999). Yet, we found that focal propensity
markers were analyzed in conjunction with change measures just 35% of the time. At last,
particularly in investigations of racio-ethnic differences, it might be useful for assorted
qualities specialists to consider the particular shapes of differing qualities inside a group and
give careful consideration to the differential encounters of every personality bunch. It is
obvious that people react distinctively to their minority status relying upon whether they are
in solo, token, or "tilted" circumstances.

SWOT ANALYSIS ON KENT CHEMICALS:

Based on the above literature, we can now perform a SWOT Analysis on Kent Chemicals,
which is as follows:

Strengths:

Solid R&D
Have made significant protected

items
Quickly developing global operations
Extensive development from 11% to

27% of income
Solid pioneers: Morales and Perri
Spirits made correspondence that

worked until development

Worldwide vicinity
Actualized development across time.

Weaknesses:

Entrepreneurial Independence:
Backups being contended with each

other, being sent out into each

other's sectors of business rather than
cooperation for contending
No trust amongst the question of
nations what is being done by each of

them
Correspondence being poor
Absence of joint effort amongst the
middle of staff and pioneers, or

within the nation.

Absence of correspondence regarding
the heading the company needs to be

going towards
Economy being powerless- all
anticipated and inclusive that will be

moving in a descended manner

No adjustment in the weight being
changed

Opportunities:

Threats:

Engage representatives
Bringing changes in the society for

Breakdown in general corporate

giving workers additional inputs

system
Absence of an extremely strong

administration
Absence in the course
Absence in the accurate degree of

correspondence
Absence of present values, vision and

(schein, 2010)
Incorporate workers within the
processes of decision making and
gatherings (dubrin, 2010)

Decrease underway expenses

Cut un-fundamental practices
Duplication of methods merge
Develop customer base
Search for new open doors
Development in restorative industryat present records for 35% of

mission
Serious rivalry in the value
Items for fire insurance
Need for reducing the costs of

creation
Worldwide anticipation of subsidence
As of now net wage of KCP has been
seeing a reduction in emotions from

worldwide income

the year 2006 to the year 2007 and

more awful had been anticipated for

the year of 2008

Rivalry in the retardants of fire across

the globe
Weight from organizations across the
globe and the ones nearby

4. CONCLUSIONS:
Within the duration of one duration of year from the statement of disappointment, the
organization of Kent Chemicals chose to be utilizing specialist related to the grounds that it
had been basic for fortifying the structure of authority. Arrangements provided by the
consultants of Kent, Sterling Partners, as a matter of fact with Kent Chemicals, there had
been an involvement of genuine issues related to administration and had contributed to show
low execution, their firm of consultancy, dissection of the situation had been done by Sterling
Partners and resulted in propelling a program of redesigning. Within this particular projects,
an association of lattice had been a setup for realigning the correspondence in an easy and
proficient manner. This would be mixing the directions across the globe, and closer prerequisite altogether. A significant change as an alternate seems to be leaving region of

operation in each and every line of business would be changing. As a matter of fact, the
division in the items for customer had contributed in maintaining the focus of their business
across the needs of client, as the organization of Kent Chemicals required to be complying
with the laws for the assurance of flame in each and every countries of operation, thus the
insurance items of the blaze had been restricted. As a point of conclusion, the plastic division
of medicines seems to be overseen by being united across the globe and closer operations
being followed by the principle consumers had been multinational corporations which
seemed to be having the capacity for supplying each and every item being included. All of
these revamping of rebuilding still could not consist the most testing and pressing problem
confronted by the company of Controls of International Headquarters on the areas of limb.
Kent Chemicals expected to actualize the accompanying changes in light of the above
given issues, yet were unsuccessful:-

president Murales drove the re-associations system that did not adjust the

worldwide side and the household side of operations.

it experienced issues actualizing re-association in its 30 assembling facilties in 13
nations as nation information and distinctive principles and regulations were hard

to oversee by Kent Chemicals.

kent used to offer its buyer items in more than 100 nations, and this was an

immeasurable zone to hanldle without a composed framework.

it required the last re-association method to resolution the worldwide financial
dangers that it confronted. It ought to proceed with the administrations of an
outside counseling structure - like Sterling Partners who could make a framework

for Kent Chemicals to take after both International and US operations.

a solid, centered key methodology was obliged to wind up worldwide and
withstand the issues as a group.

The proposals made by the partners of Sterling would be considered as being beneficial
for the organization of Kent Chemical as these helped in bringing cohesiveness and
collaboration within the organization.
It had been prescribed by Sterling that to accompany with Kent and that Kent will be
getting helpful gains to pay the charge amount with the worth of 18 million dollars, as by
using the procedures accompanied by it will be without any doubt, valuable to accomplish
development across the globe and uprooting each and every hindrances in reference to the
smooth operations before it is lead:1. Kent ought to be receiving a model of "Choice Matrix"
2. Interchanges connected with the internet
3. accountability
4. decentralizing with the learning regarding proprietorship.
5. vision being shared and arrangements in endeavoring through the headquarter along
with the backup bunches.
6. company ought to be making application of the model of five forces introduced by
Porter
7. need for carrying out analysis of SWOT, internally as well as externally
8. de Kluyer's Five phases of Globalization.
9. value Creation and Corporate Global Success.
Social personality hypothesis has been utilized to anticipate and comprehend how diversity
impacts singular state of mind and conduct and in addition group motion. To clarify the

impacts of differences on individual results, the essential contention is that one's likeness on
obvious and moderately changeless attributes impacts emotions of distinguishing proof (Tsui,
Egan&o'reilly, 1992).within gatherings, ID based on demographic likeness is connected with
in-gathering predispositions and group clash. By broadening the rationale of speculations that
clarify singular state of mind and conduct, differences analysts have discovered a solid
hypothetical basis for making forecasts about how differing qualities is prone to impact social
techniques inside groups and associations (e.g., Jehn et al., 1999; Pelled, Eisenhardt & Xin,
1999). Albeit social order and social character hypothesis were created initially to clarify the
impacts of promptly located differing qualities, a few researchers have utilized these
speculations to clarify the impacts of identity and quality based differing qualities (e.g.,
Thomas, 1999).
5. RECOMMENDATIONS:
In the year 1917, Kent Chemicals was founded as a company that produced rubber by the
Fisher family who owned the majority stake in the company. (Bartlett & Winig, 2012)
Because of abroad acquisitions, extensions and expanded deals, Kent Chemical had turned
into a main worldwide claim to fame chemical organization; a multi-headed hydra with $2.2
billion incomes in 2007. Through serious Research and Developments and various key
innovations, the organization had created a reasonable product offering including shopper,
fire security and medicinal plastics items. Nonetheless, the choice to change Kent from a U.S.
organization dallying in universal markets into a practical contender that creates, makes and
offers overall turned into a top need in 1998, when Ben Fisher got to be CEO of the
organization. To actualize his vision of a worldwide incorporated organization, Fisher named
Morales, a 22-year Kent veteran who had turned into a nation supervisor to head the global
division of Kent Chemical Products.

Kent Chemical International and Kent Chemical Products will be needed for taking care of
the hypothesis related to the Clustering Porters Nation Diamond, where there is a comprising
six different parts that are 1) Conditions of component that help in clarifying why specific
areas of the country pull in specific businesses, 2) nation related to interest in its original
form that has been identified as the interest of the country even within the context of the little
markets; 3) supporting and relating the enterprises of commercialization which seems to be
incorporating the business being supported within the area, 4) aggressiveness in the business
of home, which seems to be outlining the five different strengths having a structure of
aggressiveness, and 5) Chance and open arrangement that helps in depicting the part played
by the government within the business.

REFERENCES:
Bartlett, C.A., & Winig, L. (2012). Kent chemical: organizing for international growth. Retrieved
from Harvard University, Harvard Business School Publishing for Educators
De Kluyver, C. (2010). The globalization of companies and industries. In Fundamentals of global
strategy: A business model approach (pp. 23-42). Retrieved from Harvard University, Harvard
Business School Publishing for Educators
Alderfer, C. P. 1992. Changing race relations embedded in organizations: Report on a long-term project with the
XYZ company. In S. E. Jackson (Ed.), Diversity in the workplace: Human Resources Initiatives. New York:
Guilford. AMA. 1995. AMA survey on managing cultural diversity. New York: American Management
Association.
Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. 1998. Rethinking team composition from the outside in. In D. Gruenfeld
(Ed.), Research on managing groups and teams. Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
Ashkanasy, N. M., Hartel, C. E. J., & Dass, C. S. 2002. Diversity and emotion: The new frontiers in
organizational behavior research. Journal of Management, 28: 307338.
Barrick, M., Stewart, G., Neubert, M., & Mount, M. 1998. Relating member ability and personality to workteam processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3): 377391.

Barsade, S., Ward, A., Turner, J., & Sonnenfeld, J. 2000. To your hearts content: A model of affective
diversityin top management teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 802836.
Baugh, S., & Graen, G. 1997. Effects of team gender and racial composition on perceptions of team
performancein cross-functional teams. Group & Organization Management, 22: 366384.
Bedeian, A. G., & Mossholder, K. W. 2000. On the use of the coefficient of variation as a measure of
diversity.Organizational Research Methods, 3: 285297.
Bell, E. L. J., & Nkomo, S. M. 2001. Our separate ways: Black and white women and the struggle for
professional identity. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Bezrukova, K., & Jehn, K. A. 2001. The effects of diversity training programs. Unpublished manuscript,
Solomon
Asch Center for the Study of Ethnopolitical Conflict, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Blau, F. 1977. Equal pay in the office. Lexington: MA. Lexington Books.
Boeker,W. 1997. Strategic change: The influence of managerial characteristics and organizational growth.
Academyof Management Journal, 40: 152170.
Brewer, M. B. 1995. Managing diversity: The role of social identities. In S. E. Jackson & M. Ruderman (Eds.),
Diversity in work teams: Research paradigms for a changing workplace: 4768. Washington, DC: American
Psychological Association.
Brief, A. P., & Barsky, A. 2000. Establishing a climate for diversity: The inhibition of prejudiced reactions in the
workplace. In G. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management: Vol. 19, 91129. New
York: Elsevier.
Bunderson, J. S., & Sutcliffe, K. M. 2002. Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in
management teams: Process and performance effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 875893.
Burkard, A. W., Boticki, M. A., & Madson, M. B. 2002. Workplace discrimination, prejudice, and diversity
measurement: A review of instrumentation. Journal of Career Assessment, 10: 343361.
Carpenter, M. 2002. The implications of strategy and social context for the relationship between top
management
team heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23: 275284.
Carroll, G. R., & Harrison, J. R. 1998. Organizational demography and culture: Insights from a formal model
and
simulation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43: 637667.
Chattopadhyay, P., Glick,W. H., Miller, C. C., & Huber, G. P. 1997. Determinants of executive beliefs:
Comparing
functional conditioning and social influence. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 763789.
Chatman, J. A., & Flynn, F. J. 2001. The influence of demographic heterogeneity on the emergence and

consequences of cooperative norms in work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 956974.
Chatman, J. A., Polzer, J. T., Barsade, S. G.,&Neale, M. A. 1998. Being different yet feeling similar: The
influence
of demographic composition and organizational culture on work processes and outcomes. Administrative
Science Quarterly, 43: 749780.
Clark, M. A., Anand, V., & Roberson, L. 2000. Resolving meaning: Interpretation in diverse decision-making
groups. Group Dynamics: Theory Research and Practice, 4: 211221.
Cohen, L. E., Broschuk, & Haveman, H. A. 1998. And then there were more? The effect of organizational sex
composition on the hiring and promotion of managers. American Sociological Review, 63: 711727.
Cox, T., Jr. 1993. Cultural diversity in organizations: Theory, research&practice. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Cox, T., Jr., & Tung, R. L. 1997. The multicultural organization revisited. In C. L. Cooper & S. E. Jackson
(Eds.),
Creating tomorrows organizations. New York: Wiley.
Dass, P., & Parker, B. 1999. Strategies for managing human resource diversity: From resistance to learning.
Academy of Management Executive, 13: 6880.
De Vries, S., & Pettigrew, T. F. 1998. Effects of ethnic diversity: The position of minority workers in two Dutch
organizations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28: 15031530.
Earley, P. C., & Mosakowski, E. M. 2000. Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of international team
functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 2649.
Eby, L. T., & Dobbins, G. H. 1997. Collectivistic orientation in teams: An individual and group-level analysis.
Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18: 275295.
Elron, E. 1997. Top management teams within multinational corporations: Effects of cultural heterogeneity.
Leadership Quarterly, 8: 393412.
Elsass, P. M.,&Graves, L. M. 1997. Demographic diversity in decision-making groups: The experiences
ofwomen
and people of color. Academy of Management Review, 22: 946973.
Ely, R. J., & Thomas, D. A. 2001. Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work
group
processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 229273.
Fenwick, G. D., & Neal, D. J. 2001. Effect of Gender Composition on Group Performance. Work &
Organization,
8: 205225.

Fields, D. L., & Blum, T. C. 1997. Employee satisfaction in work groups with different gender composition.
Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18: 181196.
Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. 1996. Strategic leadership: Top executives and their effects on organizations.
St. Paul, MN: West.
Fiske, S. 1993. Social cognition and social perception. In M. R. Rozenwig & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Annual
Review
of Psychology, 44: 155194. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews Inc.
Frable, D. E. S. 1997. Gender, racial, ethnic, sexual, and class identities. Annual Review of Psychology, 48:
139162.
Frey, L. R. 2000. Diversifying our understanding of diversity and communication in groups: Dialoguing with
Clark, Anand and Roberson. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 4: 2222
Friedman, R. A. 1996. Defining the scope and logic of minority and female network groups: Can separation
enhance integration? Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 14: 307349.
Friedman, R. A., & Krackhardt, D. 1997. Social capital and career mobility: A structural theory of lower returns
to education for Asian employees. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 33: 316334.
Friedman, R. A., Kane, M., & Cornfield, D. R. 1998. Social support and career optimism: Examining the
effectiveness of network groups among black managers. Human Relations, 51: 11551177.
Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Banker, B. S., Houlette, M., Johnson, K. M., & McGlynn, E. A. 2000. Reducing
intergroup conflict: From superordinate goals to decategorization, recategorization, and mutual differentiation.
Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 4: 98114.
Gilbert, J. A., & Ivancevich, J. M. 2000. Valuing diversity: A tale of two organizations. Academy of
Management
Executive, 14: 93105.
Goll, I., Sambharya, R. B., & Tucci, L. A. 2001. Top management team composition, corporate ideology, and
firm
performance. Management International Review, 41: 109129.
Gomez, C., Kirkman, B. L.,&Shapiro, D. L. 2000. The impact of collectivism and in-group/out-group
membership
on the evaluation generosity of team members. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 10971106.
Hackman, J. R. 1999. Thinking differently about context. In R. Wageman (Ed.), Research on managing groups
and teams: Groups in context: 233247. Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. 1984. Upper eschelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers.

Academy of Management Review, 9: 193206.

Hambrick, D. C., Li, J., Xin, K., & Tsui, A. S. 2001. Compositional gaps and downward spirals international
joint
venture management groups. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 10331053.
Haythorn, W. W. 1968. The composition of groups: A review of the literature. Acta Psychologica, 28: 97128.
Hoffman, L. R. 1959. Homogeneity and member personality and its effect on group problem solving. Journal of
Abnormal Social Psychology, 58: 2732