Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
DOI: 10.5301/jn.5000190
Abstract
Introduction
549
Statistical analysis
Results are expressed as mean SEM. Data were analyzed
by paired or unpaired Student t test and ANCOVA as appropriate, two-way ANOVA for repeated measures and linear
regression.
Results
Table I
Characteristics of the study subjects
Controls
Pts pre-HD
Pts post-HD
P#
18
19
18
Sex (M/F)
9/9
9/10
55 1
61 3
BMI (kg/m2)
25.8 0.5
25.4 0.9
5.21 0.13
5.01 0.13
5.68 0.26
<.001
3.50 0.18
2.95 0.16*
3.58 0.23
<.001
1.24 0.10
1.09 0.10
1.32 0.13
<.001
1.00 0.09
2.22 0.21
1.79 0.20
<.03
VLDL+IDL
2.50 0.24
1.86 0.13
2.15 0.12
.055
LDL
0.09 0.01
0.16 0.01
0.15 0.01
n.s.
HDL
0.08 0.01
0.13 0.01*
0.10 0.01
<.007
163 4
186 6
172 6
<.002
Age (y)
551
Fig. 2 - Relationship between lag-phase and the triglycerideto-cholesterol ratio in LDL particles.
Discussion
Potentially atherogenic abnormalities of lipoprotein composition and metabolism may contribute to the high incidence
of CVD in subjects on hemodialysis. Reduced lipolysis of
VLDL particles, resulting in hypertriglyceridemia and lower
levels of HDL, has been demonstrated previously (1, 18).
Hypertriglyceridaemia has been associated with the presence of a small, dense LDL phenotype, characterized by
lower cholesterol/Tg ratios both in uremic patients (19) and
in the healthy population (20). Accordingly, in our patients
plasma Tg concentrations were higher and HDL-cholesterol tended to be lower than in control subjects pre-dialysis
(Tab. I) and both LDL and HDL fractions were enriched in
552
Fig. 3 - Lag-phase values (mean SEM) in hemodialysis patients pre-HD (grey bars) and post-HD (black bars) at baseline
and after 12 weeks of treatment with vitamin E or placebo.
*P<.05 vs. baseline.
Table II
Influence of a single hemodialysis (HD) and vitamin E supplementation on lipid parameters and
lag-phase
Treatment
Week 0
Week 12
Pre-HD
Post-HD
Pre-HD
Post-HD
Serum total C
Vit E
4.97 0.28
5.52 0.34
4.79 0.23
5.62 0.44
(mmol/L)
Placebo
5.00 0.34
5.91 0.47
5.39 0.52
5.80 0.54
Serum Tg
Vit E
2.23 0.38
1.91 0.40
1.80 0.36
1.65 0.32
(mmol/L)
Placebo
2.08 0.23
1.57 0.14
1.94 0.17
1.53 0.13
Serum HDL-C
Vit E
0.85 0.05
0.98 0.10
0.85 0.05
1.11 0.10
(mmol/L)
Placebo
1.19 0.16
1.53 0.21
1.17 0.21
1.48 0.21
Serum LDL-C
Vit E
3.11 0.28
3.65 0.36
3.13 0.23
3.78 0.41
(mmol/L)
Placebo
2.88 0.23
3.68 0.34
3.34 0.39
3.65 0.41
Vit E
1.84 0.16
2.03 0.18
2.01 0.20
1.95 0.14
Placebo
1.75 0.24
2.15 0.15
1.70 0.10
2.17 0.19
Vit E
0.15 0.02
0.14 0.01
0.16 0.02
0.14 0.02
Placebo
0.17 0.02
0.16 0.02
0.16 0.02
0.15 0.02
Vit E
0.13 0.02
0.10 0.02
0.10 0.01
0.08 0.01
Placebo
0.14 0.02
0.10 0.02
0.13 0.02
0.09 0.02
Vit E
192 9
174 11
228 19*
206 22*
Placebo
177 8
172 8
179 5
164 8
LDL
HDL
Lag-phase (min)
*P = .002 for the effect of a single hemodialysis and P<.04 for the effect of vitamin E by two-way ANOVA for repeated measures.
HDL = high density lipoprotein; IDL = intermediate density lipoprotein; LDL = low density lipoprotein; VLDL = very low density
lipoprotein.
is supported by the fact that the differences between postand pre-HD values were positively related to the weight loss
(r values of 0.46-0.57, P<.05 for all). In contrast, serum Tg
levels were significantly lower after a single dialysis probably
as a consequence of the stimulated activity of the lipoprotein
lipase induced by heparinization. Although these changes
in total serum cholesterol and Tg were not associated with
significant changes in LDL composition, the lag-phase was
reduced by 10%, suggesting that dialysis caused a reduction in the antioxidants normally resident on LDL. The only
two studies (11, 13) that have assessed the in vitro LDL resistance to copper-mediated oxidation after a single session
of hemodialysis have reported no acute effect.
553
References
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
554
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15. Jialal I, Fuller CJ. Effect of vitamin E, vitamin C and betacarotene on LDL oxidation and atherosclerosis. Can J Cardiol.
1995;11 Suppl G:97G-103G.
16. Jialal I, Fuller CJ, Huet BA. The effect of alpha-tocopherol
supplementation on LDL oxidation. A dose-response study.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1995;15(2):190-198.
17. Esterbauer H, Striegl G, Puhl H, Rotheneder M. Continuous
monitoring of in vitro oxidation of human low density lipoprotein. Free Radic Res Commun. 1989;6(1):67-75.
18. Cheung AK, Wu LL, Kablitz C, Leypoldt JK. Atherogenic lipids and lipoproteins in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney
Dis. 1993;22(2):271-276.
19. Kniger M, Quaschning T, Wanner C, Schollmeyer P, KrmerGuth A. Abnormalities in lipoprotein metabolism in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int Suppl. 1999;71:S248-S250.
20. Chait A, Brazg RL, Tribble DL, Krauss RM. Susceptibility of
small, dense, low-density lipoproteins to oxidative modification in subjects with the atherogenic lipoprotein phenotype,
pattern B. Am J Med. 1993;94(4):350-356.
21. Kronenberg F, Ikewaki K, Schaefer JR, Knig P, Dieplinger H.
Kinetic studies of atherogenic lipoproteins in hemodialysis
patients: do they tell us more about their pathology? Semin
Dial. 2007;20(6):554-560.
22. Van Tits L, De Graaf J, Hak-Lemmers H, et al. Increased levels of low-density lipoprotein oxidation in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia and in end-stage renal disease
patients on hemodialysis. Lab Invest. 2003;83(1):13-21.
23. Jurek A, Turyna B, Kubit P, Klein A. LDL susceptibility to oxidation and HDL antioxidant capacity in patients with renal
failure. Clin Biochem. 2006;39(1):19-27.
555