Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
www.elsevier.com/locate/tws
Abstract
The paper presents the formulation of a second-order Generalised Beam Theory (GBT)
developed to analyse the buckling behaviour of composite thin-walled members made of laminated plates and displaying arbitrary orthotropy. The derived second-order GBT equations are
compared with the Vlassov-type ones obtained by Bauld and Tzeng and a few remarks are
made concerning the cross-section mechanical properties appearing in the non-linear terms.
Next, a few ambiguous aspects related to the structural meaning of the results yielded by
member linear stability analyses are discussed and clarified. Finally, the application and capabilities of the formulated second-order GBT are illustrated by means of an investigation of
the buckling behaviour of thin-walled orthotropic columns and beams, which takes into account
both local and global deformation modes. 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Thin-walled composite members; Second-order generalised beam theory (GBT); Asymmetric
orthotropy; Linear stability analysis; Local-plate modes; Distortional modes; Mixed modes
1. Introduction
As already mentioned in the companion paper [1], the mechanical properties exhibited by most composite (laminated plate) thin-walled members clearly indicate a
high susceptibility to instability (buckling) phenomena, which may be classified and
characterised as follows:
0263-8231/02/$ - see front matter 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 2 6 3 - 8 2 3 1 ( 0 2 ) 0 0 0 2 6 - 5
792
Nomenclature
ij], [Bij] membrane, bending, membranebending laminate stiffness
[Aij], [D
matrices
[Bik], [Cik], [Dik] GBT basic matrices
[Fik], [Hik] GBT coupling matrices
[Xkij] GBT non-linear stiffness matrix associated to Wk
b, t
plate element width and thickness
G, S cross-section centroid and shear centre
L
member length
M, P applied bending moment and axial compressive load
x, s, z plate coordinate axes
X, Y, Z cross-section centroidal principal coordinate axes
elementary warping functions
uk(s)
u, v, w displacement field components
U, V, W, cross-section rigid-body degrees of freedom
pre-buckling internal force or moment
Wk
f
displacement amplitude function
load parameter
components written in the eigenvector coordinate system
(~)
critical bifurcation loads and buckling mode shapes
()cr
limit applied load (stress) values and deformed configurations
()lim
(i) Global buckling phenomena, which involve the deformation of the member
axis and are associated to cross-section in-plane rigid-body motions. Examples
of such phenomena are (i1) flexural or flexuraltorsional buckling of compressed members (columns) and (i2) lateraltorsional buckling of members
under bending (beams)see Fig. 1(a).
Fig. 1. Instability phenomena: (a) beam (global) lateraltorsional buckling, (b) column local-plate buckling and (c) beam distortional buckling.
793
794
non-linear aspects and their incorporation in the previously reported (first-order) GBT
makes it possible to perform linear stability analyses of prismatic composite
(laminated plate) thin-walled members displaying arbitrary orthotropy. In order to
fully understand the concepts and procedures involved in this work, the reader should
become acquainted with the fundamentals of the orthotropic GBT, which are
described and discussed in the companion paper [1].
Initially, the principle of virtual work is employed to derive the additional equilibrium equation and boundary condition terms required to perform buckling (linear
stability) analyses of laminated plate thin-walled members, i.e., the terms accounting
for the geometrically non-linear effects associated to the deformed configuration
adjacent to the member fundamental equilibrium path. These additional terms are
also physically interpreted, i.e., related to the interaction between the applied loads
(stresses) and the deformations characterising the bifurcated path. Next, the secondorder GBT equations are compared with the ones obtained by Bauld and Tzeng [21],
who developed, in 1984, a Vlassov-type beam theory (including warping effects) to
analyse fibre-reinforced members displaying thin-walled open cross-sections. Since
this theory only deals with global deformations (extension, bending and torsion), the
comparison can only involve the GBT rigid-body deformation modes. Besides
showing that there exists a perfect agreement between the two sets of equilibrium
equations, the paper also includes a few remarks regarding the cross-section mechanical properties.
Then, before addressing aspects directly related to the application and numerical
implementation of the second-order GBT equations, some attention is devoted to
identifying and characterising the different types of member second-order analyses
that can be performed by means of such equations, an issue that has often been a
source of ambiguity or misunderstanding (e.g., [21]). In particular, a systematic way
to unveil the nature of the primary equilibrium path (pre-buckling or non-linear) is
outlined and illustrated, which provides a methodology to investigate whether the
results yielded by linear stability analyses constitute true bifurcation loads or simply limit load values. In addition, the main steps involved in performing a GBT
linear stability analysis are also briefly described.
Finally, the paper concludes with an illustration of the use of the second-order
GBT to determine the buckling (linear stability) behaviour of fibre-reinforced plastic
(FRP) members, taking into account both local (local-plate and distortional) and
global modes. Lipped channel members displaying several laminated plate material
behaviours are considered and the analyses performed lead to (i) the identification
and characterisation (classification) of the relevant buckling modes and (ii) the evaluation of the corresponding bifurcation stress values. In particular, it is investigated
how these results are influenced by (i) the applied stress distribution (e.g., uniform
compression or pure bending) and (ii) the member orthotropy (laminated plate layer
configuration and fibre orientation).
795
(1)
Since the linear term was already accounted for in the first-order theory [1], only
the determination of the equilibrium equation and boundary condition terms originating from the non-linear term are dealt with from here on.
By taking into consideration the displacement representation defined in [1] (see
Eq. (4)) , the first variation of exx must now include the additional terms
(dexx)NL (vivj wiwj)fj,xdfi,x
(2)
which affect the member strain energy variation related to the work done by the
longitudinal normal stresses (sxx), i.e.,
dU
sxxdexxdzdsdx
(3)
L b t
Incorporating (2) into (3), recalling the expression of sxx (Eq. (7) of [1]) and
performing the cross-section integration (coordinates s and z), one is led to
(dUxx)NL
L b t
2
k j,x ,x
(4)
1
kij
2
kij
where (i) the first-order tensors (vectors) W1k (x) ( W1k ) and W2k(x) ( W2k ) are associated to the pre-buckling internal forces and moments due to the applied loads
(stresses) and (ii) the third-order tensors appearing in the right-hand side of this
expression stem from the cross-section integration of products involving the displacement functions uk(s) (elementary warping functions), vk(s), wk(s) and derivatives of
wk(s).
2.2. Member equilibrium equations and boundary conditions
Following the usual application of the principle of virtual work (dfi are kinematically admissible and otherwise arbitrary functions) and taking into account the firstorder terms already derived in the companion paper [1], one can establish the member
796
Matrices Cik, Hik, Dik, Fik and Bik correspond to first-order terms of the GBT equations and, as seen in [1], their components are the cross-section mechanical properties associated to the different deformation modes. As for the pre-buckling internal
k, they are assumed to depend linearly on a single load (stress)
forces and moments W
k0, with W
k0 standing for the internal forces and
k lW
parameter l, i.e., one has W
moments associated to the member reference loading profile. Moreover, they are
given by
1k W
2k ; W
1k C klf l,xx; W
2k H
klf l,x
kW
(7)
W
1
2
k are normal stress (sxx) resultants, arising respectively from
k and W
where both W
F
(i) the longitudinal strains (eM
xx exx) and from (ii) the bendingtwisting curvature
F
(gxs) due to coupling effects (the latter is absent in either isotropic, special orthotropic
ik is a null tensorsee Table 1 of [1]). Since
or cross-ply orthotropic materials, as H
1k may be
C ik are components of a diagonalised tensor (see Eq. (21) of [1]), vector W
also expressed as [13,15]
1k C kkf k,xx
.
(8)
W
1
2
3
Finally, matrices Xkij, Xkij and Xkij provide the second-order terms of the GBT
equation, i.e., stand for the geometrically non-linear effects associated to the equilibrium in the member (adjacent) deformed configuration. They read
1
X 1kij
Ckk
b t
1
X 2kij
Ckk
b t
1
X 3kij
Hkl
1
11w k(v iv j w iw j)dzds
zQ
Ckk B11w k(v iv j w iw j)ds,
b
1
13w l,s(v iv j w iw j)dzds
2zQ
2B 13w l,s(v iv j w iw j)ds
Hkl
b t
If there are intermediate nodes, the set of orthogonal functions also includes w k(s).
(9)
797
and it is important to recall, at this point, that, following the GBT simplifying
assumptions, v k(s) and w k(s) are expressed in terms of u k(s)4. Moreover, it should be
noticed that, for the sake of consistency with the classical thin-walled beam theory,
kl were incorporated in the definition of the tensors X 1kij,
the components C kk and H
k.
X 2kij, X 3kij and W
Concerning the physical interpretation and characterisation of the components of
k0 and matrices X 1kij, X 2kij and X 3kij, it is worth mentioning that:
vector W
k0 is a reference modal internal force and moment vector (W
k0 W
1k0
(i) W
2k0), obtained from the applied loads (stresses) by means of a linear preW
k0 is associated to a specific
buckling analysis5. Since each component of W
deformation mode, the corresponding physical meaning can be identified
accordingly. Therefore, one has that:
10 is associated to deformation mode
(axial extensionu 1 0 and
(i.1) W
w 1 0), i.e., it represents the (compressive) axial force.
20 is associated to deformation mode
(major axis bendingu 2 0
(i.2) W
and w 2 0), i.e., it represents the major axis bending moment.
30 is associated to deformation mode
(minor axis bendingu 3 0
(i.3) W
and w 3 0), i.e., it represents the minor axis bending moment.
40 is associated to deformation mode
(torsionu 4 0 and w 4 0
(i.4) W
), i.e., it represents the bi-moment.
k0 (k5) are associated to distortional modes (u k 0, w k 0) or
(i.5) W
local-plate modes (u k 0, w k 0), which means that they correspond
to less usual stress resultants, with no straightforward physical meaning.
k0, which,
(ii) [X 1k ], [X 2k ] and [X 3k ] are non-linear (stiffness) matrices associated to W
in general (arbitrary orthotropy), depend on (ii1) the cross-section material
geometrical properties and (ii2) the applied load (stress) nature. However, it
should be pointed out that:
(ii.1) For members made of symmetric laminated plates, matrices [X 2k ] and
[X 3k ] are null, due to the linear dependence on the thickness coordinate
z6, and, therefore, [X 1k ] is the sole non-linear matrix involved.
Provided that no intermediate nodes are involved (if this is the case, the corresponding wk(s) functions
are defined independentlysee [1]).
5
ik 0, one must evaluate both W
1k0 and W
2k0 by means of a pre-buckling (linear) analysis, since
If H
they are associated to distinct second-order effects, i.e., to different non-linear matrices (X 1kijX 2kij and
X 3kij, respectively).
6
When secondary warping effects are deemed relevant and taken into account (e.g., in angle, cruciform
or T sections) [22,23], [X 2k ] is no longer linear in z for the torsional deformation mode (the warping
displacements also vary across the wall thickness). In such case, one must adopt the first definition of
[X 2k] presented in (9), i.e., the one explicitly showing the integration over the wall thickness.
798
Fig. 2. (a) Coordinates, degrees of freedom and displacements of an arbitrary cross-section. (b) Coordinates of an arbitrary point P with respect to the cross-section shear centre S.
799
origin located at the cross-section centroid G and where Y and Z are principal axes7
and, for a given wall (plate) element, the corresponding (ii) local coordinate system
(x, s, z) and displacement field (u, v, w). Furthermore, it is assumed that (i) the crosssection shear centre S is the cross-section pole and that (ii) the origin of coordinate
s (cross-section mid-line) is located at point O (arbitrarily chosen). Then, the crosssection kinematics may be expressed in terms of the following quantities (degrees
of freedom), all of which depend exclusively on the longitudinal coordinate x [24]:
(i) Udisplacement of point O in the longitudinal direction X.
(ii) V and Wdisplacements of point S in the Y and Z directions, respectively.
(iii) rotation about the longitudinal axis (X) passing through S.
Each cross-section mid-line point Q (see Fig. 2(a)) is associated to three geometric
quantities, namely (i) its coordinates q and r, with respect to S and measured along
the mid-line tangent (q) and the wall thickness (r) directions and (ii) the mid-line
orientation, expressed by the angle a, which is the angle formed by the mid-line
tangent and the horizontal direction (Z axis). Obviously, q, r and a only depend on
the cross-section mid-line coordinate s.
Prior to the establishment of the GBT differential adjacent equilibrium equations
(deformed configuration in the immediate vicinity of the fundamental equilibrium
path), required to perform a linear stability analysis, it is necessary to express the
displacement field components u(x, s), v(x, s) and w(x, s) in terms of the cross-section
degrees of freedom U(x), V(x), W(x) and (x), each corresponding to a GBT rigid
body deformation mode [1,13]. From the observation of Fig. 2(a) and (b), it
becomes a straightforward matter to obtain the transversal displacement components
of any given cross-section point P in terms of the above degrees of freedom, by
means of the expressions
v(x,s,z) V(x)sina(s) W(x)cosa(s) (x)(r(s)z),
(10)
(11)
7
In principle, the location of the origin and the directions of the in-plane axes of the coordinate system
may be arbitrarily chosen. In this particular case, because it is intended to obtain a diagonalised system
of equilibrium equations, it is indispensable that (i) such coordinate system originates at the centroid G
and also that (ii) Y and Z are principal axes.
800
Integrating (11), with respect to s and between s 0 and s sQ, further yields
u(x,s) U(x)Y(s)V(x)Z(s)W(x)w(s)(x)
(12)
where V(x), W(x) and (x) are derivatives with respect to x and
sQ
Y(s)
sQ
sina(s)ds; Z(s)
sQ
cosa(s)ds; w(s)
r(s)ds
(13)
stand, respectively, for the differences between the values of (i) the coordinates Y,
Z and (ii) the sectorial coordinate w associated to points Q (s sQ) and O (s 0).
Moreover, it should be stressed that the terms on the right-hand side of (12) correspond to the individual contributions of each cross-section degree of freedom to the
axial displacement of point Q.
Fig. 3 shows the cross-section (rigid-body) motions associated to each degree of
freedom (classical deformation modes), as well as the corresponding axial displacement fields u k(s).
On the other hand, the representation of the displacement field components provided by GBT, for 1k4, reads [1]
u u 1f 1,x u 2f 2,x u 3f 3,x u 4f 4,x,
v v 1f 1 v 2f 2 v 3f 3 v 4f 4,
w w 1f 1 w 2f 2 w 3f 3 w 4f 4
(14)
.
A comparison between expressions (10), (12) and (14) leads to the following conclusions concerning the quantities involved in the application of GBT:
Fig. 3. Classical deformation modes and corresponding axial displacement fields u k(s): (a) extension,
(b) bending about Z, (c) bending about Y and (d) torsion.
801
(15)
(16)
w 1 0; w 2 cosa; w 3 sina; w 4 q
where it should be observed that the torsion mode is the only one associated
to cross-section in-plane flexural rotations (w 1,s w 2,s w 3,s 0 and
w 4,s 1). Moreover, it should be noticed that the secondary warping effects
are accounted for in GBT by means of the plate flexural extension (eFxx
zw,xx) contribution to the member strain energy, which is responsible for the
presence of tensorial quantities depending on z and w k (e.g., C 2ik) [1].
The incorporation of expressions (15) into (7) leads to the GBT second-order
system of differential equilibrium equations
C 11 0 0 0
0 C 22 0 0
0 0 C 33 0
0 0 0 C 44
0 0 0 0
iv
iv
iv
0 0
0 0
0 0
43
0 H
43 0
H
24
0 H
0 0
0
V
0 X 122 0
W
0 0
X 133
0 X 124 X 134
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
44
0 0 0 D
0 0 0
0 0 0
0
X 234
0 0 0
0 0 X 234 X 244
2U
W
2V
W
2W
W
2
W
0 0
0 0
0
24
H
0
X 124
1U
W
1V
W
X 134
X 144
1W
W
1
W
0 0
0 X 324
0 0
0 0
0 X 324 0 X 344
3U
W
3V
W
3W
W
3
W
(17)
802
0 0 0 0
4U
W
4V
W
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 X 444
4W
W
4
W
0 0 0 0
where X kij X 1kijX 2kij. By further introducing (16) into the components of matrices
] and [D
] (see [1]) and (ii) [X 1] and [X 2] (see (9)), one obtains
(i) [C ], [H
11(cosa)2ds,
C 11 A 11ds, C 22 A 11Y2ds D
b
11(sina)2ds, C 44 A 11w2ds D
11q2ds,
C 33 A 11Z2ds D
b
(18)
43 2 D
24 2 D
13cosads, H
13sinads,
H
b
44 4 D
33ds,
D
b
and also the components X kij, which fully define system (17) and are given by
1
1
144
11)ds,
(A 11(r2 q2) D
X 122 X 133 A 11ds 1, X
C11
C 11
1
1
X 124 A 11Zds, X 134 A 11Yds,
C11
C11
b
1
11(cosa)2)ds 1,
X 234 (A 11Y2 D
C22
b
X 244
1
11(Y 2rcosa))ds,
(A 11Y(r2 q2) D
C22
1
11(sina)2)ds 1,
X 324 (A 11Z2 D
C33
b
1
11(Z2rsina))ds,
X 344 (A 11Z(r2 q2) D
C33
b
(19)
803
1
11(w 2rq))ds
X 444 (A 11w(r2 q2) D
C44
b
.
Assuming the member subjected to a combination of (i) a compressive axial force
N, (ii) major and minor axis bending moments MZ and MY and (iii) a bi-moment B,
let us look now at the system of differential equilibrium equations provided by the
theory developed by Bauld and Tzeng [21], which can be written, in matrix form, as
A 0 0 0
I 0 0
0 I 0
0 0
iv
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 J
H 0
0 0
NU
0 1
ZS
N V
0 0
YS
N W
0 ZS YS r2
S
0 0 0
MZU
0 0 0
MZV
0 0 0
MZW
0 0 1 b
0 H
iv
0 0
iv
0 0 0 0
BU
0 0 0 0
B V
0 0 0 0
B W
0 0 0 bw
0 0 0 0
MYU
0 0 0 1
MYV
0 0 0 0
MYW
(20)
0 1 0 b
MZ
MY
0
0
This system can be directly (i.e., term by term) compared with system (17), yielded
by the application of GBT, thus providing the means to physically interpret its matrix
components. In fact, from such a comparison it is possible to draw the following conclusions:
(i) The GBT matrix components associated to the four deformation modes
depicted in Fig. 3 are related to the cross-section mechanical properties, namely:
(i.1) C 11 A is the axial stiffness.
804
(i.2)
(i.3)
(i.4)
(ii) The generalised internal forces associated to the four (rigid body) deformation
modes are:
1 N (mode
(ii.1) W
axial force).
2 MZ (mode
(ii.2) W
3 MY (mode
(ii.3) W
4 B (mode
(ii.4) W
bi-moment).
(iii) Matrices [X k] (see (19)) incorporate the material elastic properties and the
cross-section geometrical characteristics, two aspects that, in general, cannot
be separated, as happens for isotropic materials. In particular, it should be
mentioned that:
(iii.1) Matrix [X 1] corresponds to a uniform normal stress diagram (associated
to mode ), with non-null components X 122 X 133 1, X 144 rS2,
X 124 ZS and X 134 YS (YS and ZS are the shear centre S coordinates
and rS is the cross-section polar radius of gyration with respect to S).
(iii.2) Matrix [X 2] corresponds to a linear (in Y) normal stress diagram
(associated to mode ), with non-null components X244 bZ and
X234 1 (bZ is a parameter accounting for the lack of antisymmetry
of u2(s)8).
(iii.3) Matrix [X 3] corresponds to a linear (in Z) normal stress diagram
(associated to mode ), with non-null components X344 bY and
X324 1 (bY accounts for the lack of antisymmetry of u3(s)8).
(iii.4) Matrix [X 4] corresponds to a linear (in w) normal stress diagram
(associated to mode ), with a single non-null component X444
bw (bw accounts for the lack of antisymmetry of u4(s)).
(iv) In the expressions (19), the secondary warping effects are taken into account
11. However, in
by means of the terms involving the plate bending stiffness D
cross-sections exhibiting primary warping, such effects are (comparatively)
very small and, therefore, may be safely neglected.
8
Because they are also associated to the lack of (geometrical) symmetry of the cross-section, parameters by and bz are often designated as asymmetry parameters [23].
805
806
9
Obviously, such non-linear equilibrium path can only be obtained through the (incremental-iterative)
numerical solution of the second-order GBT equations.
807
in Fig. 4(a), where it can be also observed that the primary path is just
the first-order approximation of the non-linear one.
(ii.4) If the answer to the previous question is negative, the primary equilibrium path is a pre-buckling (fundamental) path from which a bifurcation
takes place at the critical load value (lcr) and with the buckling mode
shape determined in (ii.1). This situation is illustrated in Fig. 4(b).
In order to provide a better grasp and illustrate the application of the procedure
just described, let us consider the geometrically non-linear behaviour of the isotropic
channel column depicted in Fig. 5, which is simply supported and subjected to an
eccentric compressive load P.
For the sake of simplicity, only the cross-section rigid-body deformation modes
are taken into account, namely axial extension (U), major and minor axis bending
(V and W) and torsion (). An exact (analytical) solution of the corresponding system
of second-order differential equations (20) (single half-wave sinusoidal buckling
mode) leads to the eigenvalue problem defined by
p2EIZ
P 0
L2
P(ZSeZ)
p2EIY
P PeY
L2
P(ZSeZ) PeY
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
p2E
GJP(r2SbYeZ)
L2
a
0
V
aW 0
a
0
Linear stability results: (a) limit loads; (b) critical bifurcation loads.
, (21)
808
where (i) eY (eZ) is the load eccentricity, with respect to the centroid G and measured
along the Y (Z) axis (Y and Z are the centroidal principal axes), (ii) IY (IZ) is the
minor (major) moment of inertia, (iii) and J are the warping and St. Venants
constants, (iv) ZS is the coordinate of the shear centre S, (v) rS is the polar radius
of gyration with respect to S and (vi) bY is the cross-section asymmetry parameter
related to minor axis bending. Four different load cases are dealt with and, for each
of them, one (i) determines the primary (equilibrium) path deformation mode participation and (ii) performs a linear stability analysis involving all the (four) deformation
modes taken into account. Next, the load cases considered are identified and the
corresponding results are presented and discussed:
(I) Concentrically loaded column (eY eZ 0). The primary path is associated
only to axial extension (U) and, depending on the column length, the critical
buckling mode may involve either minor axis bending (W), for the longer
columns, or major axis bending and torsion (V ), for the shorter columns.
Regardless of the column length, the primary path is always a pre-buckling
one. However, the critical buckling mode shape depends on which of the two
bifurcation load values (PIcr.W and PIcr.V ) is smaller.
(II) Z-eccentrically loaded column (eZ 0, eY 0). The primary path is associated
to axial extension and minor axis bending (U W). If the critical buckling
mode involves minor axis bending (W), the primary path is a non-linear one
and tends to Plim PIcr.W. If the critical buckling mode involves major axis
bending and torsion (V ), the primary path is a pre-buckling one and bifurcation occurs for PIIcr.V ( PIcr.V ).
(III) Y-eccentrically loaded column (eY 0, eZ 0). Since the primary path is
associated to axial extension, major axis bending and torsion (U V )
and the critical buckling mode involves major and minor axis bending and
torsion (V W ), no bifurcation occurs and one has Plim PIII
cr.V W
I
III
I
(notice that PIII
cr.V W Pcr.W and Pcr.V W Pcr.V ).
(IV) Z+Y-eccentrically loaded column (eZ 0, eY 0). The primary path is now
associated to all four deformation modes (U V W ), which means
that it is a non-linear equilibrium path tending to Plim
III
PIV
cr.V W ( Pcr.V W ).
It is still worth pointing out that a correct interpretation of the results provided
by a member linear stability analysis is even more important in the presence of either
local deformation modes and/or a more complex (orthotropic) material behaviour
(e.g., laminated plate members). For instance, members made of asymmetric laminated plates exhibit no bifurcations, even when subjected to uniform concentric compression. This fact, which is due to the occurrence of stretchingtwisting and bendingtwisting coupling effects [25,26], implies that the primary paths are always nonlinear equilibrium paths tending to limit load values obtained by means of linear
stability analyses.
809
5. Illustrative examples
In order to provide a better grasp of the concepts and procedures just presented,
the GBT is employed to investigate the buckling behaviour of thin-walled channel
members, namely columns (concentrically compressed members) and beams
(members under uniform major axis bending). The column and beam material proper-
810
ties and cross-section mid-line dimensions are identical and were described in the
companion paper [1]. However, different plate thickness values are dealt with,
namely (i) t 0.3 cm (three 0.1 cm layers), for the columns (as in [1]), and (ii)
t 0.6 cm (three 0.2 cm layers), for the beams. Notice that, by choosing this new
(larger) thickness value, it becomes possible to illustrate the critical distortional buckling behaviour, a phenomenon which does not occur for the column cross-section
10 P (axial
geometry. As for the applied stress resultants, they read W
20 MZ (major axis bending), for the beams.
compression), for the columns, and W
The associated column and beam bifurcation/limit loads (recall Section 4) are given,
1.lim llimP Plim and by (ii) W
2.cr
1.cr lcrP or W
respectively, by (i) W
2.lim llimMZ MZ.lim (l is the stress or load parameter).
lcrMZ MZ.cr or W
5.1. Columns (concentrically compressed members)
The column first-order mechanical properties may be found in [1] (Tables 24)
and the non-linear (stiffness) matrices [X 1] are displayed in Tables 1 to 3. Such
matrices correspond to the different plate mechanical behaviours dealt with here,
namely (i) isotropy (Table 1), (ii) (symmetric) cross-ply orthotropy (Table 2) and
(iii) asymmetric orthotropy (Table 3)10.
Since the deformation modes display either symmetric or antisymmetric configurations (see Fig. 14 of [1]), the column non-linear matrices [X 1ij] have null offdiagonal even-to-odd-number components (see Tables 1 and 2), which means that,
in isotropic or cross-ply orthotropic columns, no coupling is liable to occur between
ik] and [F ik] are null).
symmetric and antisymmetric modes (recall that matrices [H
On the other hand, in asymmetric orthotropic columns, the off-diagonal even-to ik] and [F ik] are non-null (see Table 4 in
odd-number components of matrices [H
[1]), thus indicating that coupling may occur between all the modes. However, it
should be noticed that, in spite of the distinct mechanical behaviours, the three columns exhibit relatively similar non-linear (stiffness) matrices, which stems from the
kl
fact that their components are normalised by the mechanical quantities C kk and H
(see (9)).
By (i) incorporating the values displayed in Tables 1 to 3 in the GBT system of
equations (5) and (ii) discretising the member (f k(x) are approximated by third-order
Hermitian polynomials), one is led to a system of algebraic equations defining an
eigenvalue problem. The smallest root of the corresponding characteristic equation
provides the value of the column (i) critical bifurcation load Pcr (isotropy and symmetric cross-ply orthotropy) or (ii) limit load Plim (asymmetric orthotropy). Fig. 6(a)
depicts the variation with the length L of either Pcr (isotropic and cross-ply orthotropic columnssolid and dotted curves, respectively) or Plim (asymmetric orthotropic
columnsdashed curve). As for Figs. 6(b1), (b2) and (b3), they show the degree of
10
The buckling behaviour of specially orthotropic columns and beams was investigated, using GBT,
in [27,28].
mode k
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
9.868
0
1
0
9.868
0
157.6
0
0.0834
0
0.1195 0
1.232
0
0.1795
0
0.1287
0
1.727
0
0.1469
0
0.0965 0
0.0221
Table 1
Non-linear (stiffness) matrix componentsisotropic behaviour
0
0
0.0834
0
0.0475
0
0.0367
0
0.0036
0
0
0.1195
0
1.232
0
0.0586
0
0.0003
0
0.0371
X 1
0
0
0.1795
0
0.0367
0
0.2094
0
0
0
0
0.1287
0
1.727
0
0.0003
0
0.1066
0
0
0
0
0.1469
0
0.0036
0
0
0
0.0992
0
0
0.0965
0
0.0221
0
0.0371
0
0
0
0.1512
mode k
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
9.867
0
0.1197
0
0.1297
0
0.0975
0
0
0
9.867
1
0
0
157.6
0.0844
0
0
1.2317
0.1795 0
0
1.727
0.1470
0
0
0.0221
0
0
0.0844
0
0.0476
0
0.0367
0
0.0036
0
Table 2
Non-linear (stiffness) matrix componentssymmetric cross-ply orthotropic behaviour
0
0.1197
0
1.2317
0
0.0589
0
0.0009
0
0.0371
X 1
0
0
0.1795
0
0.0367
0
0.2095
0
0
0
0
0.1297
0
1.727
0
0.0009
0
0.1067
0
0
0
0
0.1470
0
0.0036
0
0
0
0.0992
0
0
0.0975
0
0.0221
0
0.0371
0
0
0
0.1513
812
N. Silvestre, D. Camotim / Thin-Walled Structures 40 (2002) 791820
mode k
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
9.834
0
0.1185
0
0.1268
0
0.0720
0
0
1
0
0.0818
0
0.1771
0
0.1457
0
0
9.834
0
156.9
0
1.222
0
1.673
0
0.2943
0
0
0.0818
0
0.0467
0
0.0351
0
0.0042
0
Table 3
Non-linear (stiffness) matrix componentsasymmetric orthotropic behaviour
0
0.1185
0
1.222
0
0.0576
0
0.0007
0
0.0344
X 1
0
0
0.1771
0
0.0351
0
0.2082
0
0.0009
0
0
0.1268
0
1.673
0
0.0007
0
0.1084
0
0.0082
0
0
0.1457
0
0.0042
0
0.0009
0
0.0990
0
0
0.0720
0
0.2943
0
0.0344
0
0.0082
0
0.1417
814
Fig. 6. (a) Variation Pcr or Plim with L, (b) buckling mode participation: (b1) isotropy; (b2) cross-ply
orthotropy; (b3) asymmetric orthotropy and (c) buckling mode configuration: (c1) isotropy and cross-ply
orthotropy; (c2) asymmetric orthotropy.
815
816
Fig. 7. (a) Variation MZ.cr or MZ.lim with L, (b) buckling mode participation: (b1) isotropy; (b2) crossply orthotropy; (b3) asymmetric orthotropy and (c) buckling mode configuration: (c1) isotropy and crossply orthotropy; (c2) asymmetric orthotropy.
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
817
LP
values, they read MLP
Z.cr 9720 kNcm (isotropy) and MZ.cr 3075 kN cm
(cross-ply orthotropy).
For 40 cm L 150 cm (isotropy) or 60 cm L 220 cm (cross-ply
orthotropy), the column buckles in a distortional buckling mode (DM + )
with 12 half-waves (isotropy and cross-ply orthotropy). The minimum critical
moment values read now MDZ.cr 5503 kNcm (isotropy) and MDZ.cr
1954 kNcm (cross-ply orthotropy).
For 150 cm L 450 cm (isotropy) or 220 cm L 700 cm (cross-ply
orthotropy), buckling takes place in a flexuraldistortional mode
(FDM + + ).
For L 450 cm (isotropy) or L 700 cm (cross-ply orthotropy), buckling
takes place in a flexuraltorsional mode (FTM + ), commonly designated
as lateral buckling [23].
and
participate in either the FDM or the FTM,
Since the global modes
the value of MZ.cr continuously decreases for L 150 cm (isotropy) or L
220 cm (cross-ply orthotropy).
818
made of laminated plates and displaying arbitrary orthotropy. The second-order GBT
(adjacent) equilibrium equations and corresponding boundary conditions were first
derived, by employing the principle of virtual work and accounting for the appropriate geometrically non-linear effects. Moreover, a physical interpretation was provided
for the second-order terms, i.e., the terms related to the interaction between the
applied stresses and the deformations characterising the bifurcated path. Next, the
second-order GBT equations developed were compared with the Vlassov-type ones
obtained by Bauld and Tzeng [21]. Although involving only rigid-body modes,
such a comparison revealed a quite perfect agreement between the two sets of equilibrium equations. A few remarks regarding the cross-section mechanical properties
were also included. On the basis of the formulated second-order orthotropic GBT,
the following distinctive traits were identified:
(i) Matrix [X kij], which describes the cross-section non-linear behaviour, combines both material properties and geometrical characteristics, a feature stemming directly from the orthotropy due to the laminated plate layer nature and/or
configuration. Recall that, in the isotropic GBT, the material quantities do not
appear in [X kij], which provides the justification for the commonly used designation geometric matrix.
(ii) In orthotropic members, the second-order equilibrium equations are generally
highly coupled, as there are four different coupling sources, namely the ones
ik], [F ik] and [X kij]. Recall that, in the case of
ik], [H
associated to matrices [D
isotropic members, [X kij] is the only matrix responsible for the occurrence of
coupling effects.
Then, a few paragraphs were devoted to clarifying a few aspects related to the
identification and characterisation of the different types of member second-order
analyses that can be performed by means of the developed GBT equations. In particular, a systematic methodology was proposed to investigate whether the results
yielded by linear stability analyses constitute genuine bifurcation loads or simply
limit load values. In addition, a brief description of the main steps involved in
performing a GBT linear stability analysis was presented.
Finally, in order to illustrate the application and potential of the formulated secondorder GBT, the buckling (linear stability) behaviour of thin-walled composite members was determined, taking into account both local and global deformation modes.
In particular, linear stability analyses were performed on lipped channel columns
and beams displaying three different material behaviours (laminated plate layer
configurations), namely isotropy, cross-ply orthotropy and asymmetric orthotropy.
The results obtained led to (i) the identification and characterisation of the relevant
buckling modes and to (ii) the evaluation of the corresponding bifurcation or limit
load values. In particular, it was shown that:
(i) Critical bifurcations take place for all the isotropic or cross-ply orthotropic
columns and beams considered in this work. However, asymmetric orthotropic
display no bifurcation, as their primary paths are always non-linear. They tend,
819
References
[1] Silvestre N, Camotim D. First-order generalised beam theory for arbitrary orthotropic materials.
Thin-Walled Struct 2002;6:74983.
[2] Davies JM. Modelling, analysis and design of thin-wall steel structures. In: Light-weight steel and
aluminium structures. London: Elsevier Science; 1999. p. 318.
[3] Mottram JY. Lateraltorsional buckling of pultruded I-beams. Composites 1992;23(2):8192.
[4] Turvey GJ. Lateral buckling tests on rectangular cross-section pultruded GRP cantilever beams.
Composites: Part B 1995;27B(1):3542.
[5] Pandey M, Kabir M, Sherbourne A. Flexuraltorsional stability of thin-walled composite I-section
beams. Compos. Eng. 1995;5(3):32142.
[6] Davalos F, Qiao P, Salim H. Flexuraltorsional buckling of pultruded fiber reinforced plastic composite I-beams. Compos. Struct. 1997;38(14):24150.
[7] Brooks R, Turvey G. Lateral buckling of pultruded GRP I-section cantilevers. Compos. Struct.
1995;32(14):20315.
[8] Barbero E, Tomblin J. Euler buckling of thin-walled composite columns. Thin-Walled Struct.
1993;17:23758.
[9] Barbero E, Fu S, Raftoyiannis I. Local buckling of FRP beams and columns. J. Mater. Civ. Eng.
(ASCE) 1993;5(3):33955.
[10] Tomblin J, Barbero E. Local buckling experiments on FRP columns. Thin-Walled Struct.
1994;18:97116.
[11] Bank L, Nadipelli M, Gentry T. Local buckling and failure of pultruded FRP beams. J. Eng. Mater.
Technol. (ASME) 1994;116:2337.
[12] Pecce M, Cosenza E. Local buckling curves for the design of FRP profiles. Thin-Walled Struct.
2000;37(3):20722.
[13] Schardt R. Verallgemeinerte Technische Biegetheorie. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1989 [in German].
[14] Schardt R. The generalized beam theory, instability and plastic collapse of steel structures. In: Proceedings of the M.R. Horne Conference, University of Manchester, 1983. p. 469-75.
[15] Davies JM, Leach P, Heinz D. Second-order generalised beam theory. J. Construct. Steel Res.
1994;31(23):22141.
[16] Davies JM, Leach P. An experimental verification of the generalised beam theory applied to interactive buckling problems. Thin-Walled Struct. 1996;25(1):6179.
[17] Schardt R. Generalized beam theoryan adequate method for coupled stability problems. ThinWalled Struct. 1994;19:16180.
[18] Hancock GJ. Local, distortional and lateral buckling of I-beams. J. Struct. Div. (ASCE)
1978;104(11):178798.
[19] Hancock GJ. Finite strip buckling and nonlinear analyses and distortional buckling analysis of thinwalled structural members. In: Rondal J, editor. Coupled instabilities in metal structures: theoretical
and design aspects, CISM Course No. 379 (Part V). Wien: Springer-Verlag; 1998. p. 22589.
[20] Hancock GJ, Davids AJ, Key PW, Law SC, Rasmussen KJ. Recent developments in the buckling
and nonlinear analysis of thin-walled structural members. Thin-Walled Struct. 1990;9:30938.
[21] Bauld RB, Tzeng L. A Vlasov theory for fibre-reinforced beams with thin-walled open cross-sections.
Int. J. Solids Struct. 1984;20(3):27794.
[22] Loughlan J, Ata M. The behaviour of open and closed section carbon fibre composite beams subjected to constrained torsion. Compos. Struct. 1997;38(14):63147.
820
[23] Trahair NS. Flexuraltorsional buckling of structures. London: E & FN Spon, 1993.
[24] Vlassov BZ. Thin-walled elastic bars. (Israel Program for Scientific Translation, Jerusalem, for the
National Science Foundation, Washington, Trans.) 1961 (Original work published 1959).
[25] Jensen DW, Lagace PA. Influence of mechanical couplings on the buckling and postbuckling of
anisotropic plates. AIAA J. 1988;26(10):126977.
[26] Wang S. Buckling of thin skew fibre-reinforced composite laminates. Thin-Walled Struct.
1997;28(1):2141.
[27] Silvestre N, Camotim D, Batista E, Nagahama K. Buckling behaviour of thin-walled composite
columns using generalised beam theory. In: Zaras J, Kowal-Michalska K, Rodhes J, editors. Thinwalled structuresadvances and developments. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2001. p. 32937.
[28] Silvestre N, Camotim D. Buckling behaviour of FRP thin-walled lipped channel members. In: Topping BHV, editor. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Civil & Structural Engineering Computing. Civil-Comp Press; 2001. p. 778 (full paper in CD-ROM, #29).