Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
WELFARE – as the state of well being of the persons comprising an economic system.
WELFARE
Most economic analysis is concerned with the welfare aspects of economic activity- how to
achieve or optimum welfare constitutes a major problem. As we noted in previous
chapters, the concept is straightforward where only one person is being considered and is
synonymous with that person’s well being. But when more than one individual is at issue,
an objective definition of a unique optimum welfare position for the group as a whole
becomes impossible, since such a definition would require interpersonal comparisons of
satisfaction. The Pareto optimal situation, in which no one can be made better off
without making someone else worse off, is the best solution that we can attain.
There is no unique Pareto optimal situation for a group.
The welfare of a group is much more difficult to handle, comparisons of this sort raise
serious problems. How can changes in the well being of different persons be compared? In
some specific cases we can make rough subjective judgments. Taking a Rembrandt away
from a connoisseur of art and giving it to a person who does not understand or value art
would surely reduce group welfare. We are left with a group welfare concept known as
Pareto optimal situation exists when no even can increase the well being of someone else
to consider the matter in another way, a situation is not Pareto optimal if one is to make
persons can be made better off without making anyone else worse off. If a situation is not
Pareto optimal, a movement towards it –making at least one person better off without
making anyone else worse off-increases group welfare.
Equilibrium
Concept is important, not because equilibrium position is ever in fact attained but
because these concepts show us the direction in which economic processes move. When
equilibrium positions are unstable, disturbances will cause economic units to move farther
away from rather than toward such positions.
Partial equilibrium
A large part of the analytical structure that we have built up is called partial
equilibrium analysis. It has been concerned with the movements of individual economic
units toward equilibrium positions in response to the given economic conditions confronting
them. Thus, the consumer, with given tastes and preferences, is confronted with a given
income and with given prices of goods and services. Each consumer adjusts his or her
Partial equilibrium is especially suitable for the analysis of two types of problems
both of which we have met time and again through the book. Problems of the first type are
those arising from economic disturbances that are not of sufficient magnitude to reach far
and beyond the confines of a given industry or sector of the economy. Problems of the
second type are concerned with the first order effects of an economic disturbance of any
kind.
As an illustration of the first kind of the first problem, suppose that the production
workers of a small manufacturer or plastic products go on strike. Suppose further that the
plant is located in a large city and that the workers are fairly well dispersed among the
residential areas there. The effects of the strike will be limited largely to the company and
the employers concerned. Partial equilibrium analysis will provide the relevant answer to
most of the economic problems arising from the strike.
General Equilibrium
General equilibrium for the entire economy only exists if all economic units were to achieve
simultaneous partials or particular equilibrium adjustments.
General equilibrium theory provides the analytical tools for accomplishing two objectives:
From the stand point of pure theory, it provides the Means of viewing the economic
system in each entirety. The means of seeing what holds it together, what makes it
works, and how it operate,
It permits the determination of the second, third and higher order effects of an
economic disturbance.
Since general equilibrium analysis covers the interrelationships among all parts of
the economy, it necessarily becomes exceedingly complex. There are two principal
variants of it. In the first one, following Leon Walras most economists find it convenient to
discuss general equilibrium in mathematical terms. The interdependence of economic units
is shown through a system of simultaneous equation relating the many economic variables
to one another the walrasian version of general equilibrium provides the essential
theoretical apparatus for understanding the interrelationships of the various sector of the
economy.
The attainment of general equilibrium in an economic system does not imply that
Pareto optimality is also attained. A price system tends to move the economy toward
general equilibrium. However, unless pure competition exist in both product and resource
markets, and unless there are no externalities occurring, Pareto optimally will not follow.
Walra’s general equilibrium model is simple, that is to say, the economic ideas that
are its building blocks are simple, modern versions of them have been presented earlier in
this book. To a mathematician, Walra’s mathematics is not complex. But full and easy und
of the general equilibrium of prices is denied to many students of economics.
Some admirers of private enterprise might not like the fate of business people in the
model. The entrepreneur’s in Walra’s model are drones. They control no prices, they exert
no power over other person; they fulfil no social responsibilities. They are compelled by the
system of prices to be efficient to produce at the lowest attainable costs. Infact their
singular function is to be innovators and risk takers, entrepreneurs do not exist at all in
Walra’s model. Neither do labor leaders.
General equilibrium theory has furnished the conceptual foundation for input-output
analysis, which was created by Wassily Leontief of Harvard University. Input-output
analysis is the statistical measurement of the input and outputs of all industries taken
together in an interdependent system of commodity flow.
WELFARE
Pareto efficiency is in itself a desirable goal- if there is some way to make some
group of people better off without hurting other people, why not do it? But there will usually
be many Pareto efficient allocations; how can society choose among them?
The major focus of this chapter will be the idea of a welfare function, which
provides a way to “add together” different consumers` utilities. More generally, a welfare
function provides a way to rank different distributions of utility among consumers. Before
we investigate the implications of this concept, it is worthwhile considering just how might
go about “adding together” the individual consumers` preferences to construct some kind
of “social preferences.”
EXTERNALITIES:
We can say that an economic situation involves a consumption externality if one
consumer cares directly about another agent`s production or consumption. For example, I
have definite preferences about my neighbor or playing loud music at 3 in the morning, or
the person next to me in a restaurant smoking a cheap cigar, or the amount of pollution
produced by local automobiles. These are all examples of negative consumption
externalities. On the other hand, I may get pleasure from observing my neighbor`s flower
garden-this is an example of a positive consumption externality.
In earlier chapters we saw that the market mechanism was capable of achieving
Pareto efficient allocations when externalities were not present .If externalities are present,
the market will not necessarily result in a Pareto efficient provision of resources. However,
there are other social institutions such as the legal system or government intervention that
can “mimic” the market mechanism to some degree and thereby achieve Pareto efficiency.
PREFERENCES
The economic model of consumer behavior is very simple: people choose the best things
they can afford. This chapter will be devoted to clarifying the economic concept of “best
things.” We call the objects of consumer choice consumption bundles .This is a complete
list of the goods and services that are involved in the choice problem that we that we are
investigating. The word “complete” deserves emphasis: when you analyze a consumer`s
choice problem, make sure that you include all of the appropriate goods in the definition of
the consumption bundle.
If we are analyzing consumer choice at the broadest level, we would want not only a
complete list of the goods that a consumer might consume, but also a description of when,
where, and under what circumstances they would become available. After all, people care
about how much food they will have tomorrow as well as how much food they have today.
MRSxy = MRSxy
This condition can be extend to as many goods and services and as many
consumers as there in the economy.
Figure 84
Optimum Consumer Welfare: Fixed Supplies
Figure 85
Externalities in Consumption
MRTSab = MRTSYab
Figure 86
Optimum Productive Efficiency
EXTERNALITIES
Can arise between producers, between customers, or between both the producers
and the customers.
Source: investopedia
An externality can be either positive or negative.
Negative Externalities – Occurs when action of one party imposes costs to other party.
(2) When a producing plant of steel dumps their waste in a river basin
which fisher folks is dependent on their daily catch of fish for their daily
living; producing plant has no incentive to account for the external cost
that they imposes on the affected fishermen when making its production
decision.
(3) Suppose, that a two way lane highway are used by the producers of
automobiles, producers of can goods and other manufacturing
industries, and other marketing sources for delivering their goods to
consumers
Positive Externalities – When the action of one party benefits another party.
Example:
If externalities occur in the production of a good and services, the contract curve
may no longer show the conditions of maximum efficiency. Furthermore, there is no market
in which these external costs can be reflected in the price of goods and services.
One of the common examples is the condition of Philippine road network (Major Highways,
secondary road and other form of roads):
a
2
Highway Highway
Facilities Facilities
per Unit of per Unit of
Time Time
a
1
E
Qw
Other Resources
per unit of time
Suppose, producers of automobiles, producers of can goods and producers of
processed meat products used the two way lane highway at the same time without
consideration
with other road users; tendencies are, congestion in the highway is inevitable and will
cause transportation delays in the delivery goods and other services.
The marginal rate of technical substitution between highway facilities and other resources
is the same at point “E”. This distribution or allocation of resources is not optimal. If one
firm decreases their usage of highway facilities by using other alternative road, production
productivity of highway facilities and the remaining firms using the same facilities will tend
to increase provided that they maintained their output level.
Efficiency in Exchange:
Allocation of goods in which no one can be made better off unless someone else is
made worse off.*
Source: *Microeconomics by: R. Pindyck & D. Rubinfield
Name of
Allocation (Initial) Exchange Allocation (Final)
Individual
Food Clothing Food Clothing Food Clothing
Kathy 3 5 1 -1 4 4
Jaime 7 1 -1 1 6 2
As a rule, voluntary trade between two people or two countries is mutually beneficial1.
If trade is beneficial, which trades can occur? Which of those trades will allocate goods
efficiently among customers? How much better off will consumers then be?
Showing all possible allocations of either two goods between two people or two
inputs between production processes.
Illustration 1
Jaime’s Kathy's
Clothin Clothin
g g
B
2
C 4C
+ 1C
1
C 5C
-
1F A
6
C
OJ Jaime’s Food 6 F 7 F 10 F
Note: Each point in the Edgeworth box simultaneously represents Jaime’s and Kathy’s market baskets of food
and clothing. At point A, Jaime has 7 units of food and 1 unit of clothing; and Kathy has 3 units of food and
5 units of clothing.
1
Efficient Allocations:
A trade from point A to point B thus made both (Jaime & Kathy) better off. But is
point B an efficient allocation?
Answer: It is depends on whether Jaime & Kathy’s MRS are at the same at B, which
depends in turn on the shape of their indifference curves. In the illustration below show
several indifference curves for both Jaime & Kathy. Their allocation2 are measured from
the OJ, Jaime’s indifference curves are drawn in the usual way while for Kathy, it was
rotated the indifference curves opposite (180 degrees) of Jaime, so that the origin is at the
upper right hand corner of the box. Kathy’s indifference curves are convex, while Jaime
indifference curves are concave.
Illustration 2
10 F Kathy's Food OC
1 There are several situations in which trade may not be advantageous. First, limited information may lead people to
believe that trade will make them better off when in fact it will not. Second, people may be coerced into making trades,
either by physical threats or by the threat of future economic reprisals. Third, barriers to free trade can sometimes
provide a strategic advantage to a country.
2
Even if a trade from an inefficient allocation makes both people better off, the new allocation is not
necessarily efficient.
6C
Kathy'
Jaime's s
Clothin Clothi
g ng
6C
OJ Jaime’s Food 10F
Note: The Edgeworth box illustrates the possibilities for both consumers to increase their satisfaction by
trading goods. If “A” the initial allocation of resources, the shaded area describes all mutually
beneficial trades.