Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Communication Education
Publication details, including instructions for authors and
subscription information:
http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rced20
To cite this article: William Work (1981) ERIC report: Communication across cultures,
Communication Education, 30:2, 184-191, DOI: 10.1080/03634528109378468
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03634528109378468
WILLIAM
WORK,
DIRECTOR
ERIC
REPORT
ERIC/RCS
COMMUNICATION ACROSS
CULTURES
In one sense, all communication (except, perhaps, "intrapersonal communication") is crosscultural communication.
Each human being is a unique culture of
one; each takes his or her cultural
biases into transactions with others.
The Random House Dictionary defines culture as "the sum total of ways
of living built up by a group of human
beings and transmitted from one generation to the next." We often identify
cultures with national boundaries and
with the predominant language of the
people. In North America there is the
Spanish-language culture of Mexico, the
English-language culture of the United
States, and the French-speaking and
English-speaking cultures of Canada.
To suggest that there is a single culture in the United States is, of course,
a gross oversimplification. America
has many subcultures: Native American, Afro-American, Hispanic-American,
Italian-American, and so on. Cultures
are not defined only by national origin
or ethnicity. In our country, there are
cultures of poverty and affluence and
there is a so-called middle-class culture;
there are rural and urban cultures; New
England and Southern cultures; male
and female cultures; teen-age and seniorcitizen cultures; gay and straight cultures; Democrat and Republican
cultures; and so on.
It is an axiom in crosscultural communication situations that the greater
the cultural differences between communicators the more difficult it is to
SPEECH
COMMUNICATION
ASSOCIATION MODULE
ERIC REPORT-185
Summer
Conference
on
Inter-
186-COMMUNICATION EDUCATION
INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION AND
THE CONCEPT OF MARGINALITY
RESEARCH
Findings from several recent studies
INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION: A
suggest that the gender, cultural backBIBLIOGRAPHY OF ERIC DOCUMENTS
ground, and age of observers may influence their perception and evaluation Erickson, Randall D., 1978, 116p. (ED 167 170)
of nonverbal communication. There is This bibliography consists of documents
ample evidence to warrant using raters in the ERIC system which deal, in total
of only one sex (preferably female) and or in part, with the topics of interonly one cultural background when the cultural communication, which is derating task involves decoding nonverbal fined as the communication of two
communication. An alternate strategy people or a group of people across culwould be to include rater gender or tural barriers either within one nation
ethnicity as an independent variable. or between members of two nations.
ERIC REPORT-187
This paper discusses problems and approaches in assessing intercultural variation in the affective impact of visual
aspects of screen media (film and filmstrips). As a first step in approaching the
problem, a semantic differential was
used to compare responses of Spanishspeaking and English-speaking samples.
Each group saw two films and one filmstrip, completing specially developed
semantic differential scales after each
viewing.
188-COMMUNICATION EDUCATION
ERIC REPORT-I89
190-COMMUNICATION EDUCATION
LITERACY AS INTERETHNIC
COMMUNICATION: AN ATHABASKAN
CASE. WORKING PAPERS IN
SOCIOLINGUISTICS, No- 59
PERSPECTIVES ON EXPERIENTIAL
LEARNING IN INTERCULTURAL
COMMUNICATION
ERIC REPORT-19I
Helms, Anne, Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the Southwestern Anthropological Association, 1978, 12p. (ED 157 851)
SchlUcr.