Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
$2.50
AMERICAN ATHEIST
A Journal of Atheist News and Thought
1983
1963
****.***.***** _ *
AMERICAN ATHEISTS
is a non-profit, non-political, educational organization, dedicated to the complete and absolute separation of
state and church. We accept the explanation of Thomas Jefferson that the "First Amendment" to the
Constitution of the United States was meant to create a "wall of separation" between state and church.
American Atheists are organized to stimulate and promote freedom of thought and inquiry concerning
religious beliefs, creeds, dogmas, tenets, rituals and practices;
to collect and disseminate information, data and literature on all religions and promote a more thorough
understanding of them, their origins and histories;
to encourage the development and public acceptance of a human ethical system, stressing the mutual
sympathy, understanding
and interdependence
of all people and the corresponding responsibility of each
individual in relation to society;
to develop and propagate a culture in which man is the central figure who alone must be the source of
strength, progress and ideals for the well-being and happiness of humanity;
to promote the study of the arts and sciences and of all problems affecting the maintenance,
perpetuation and enrichment of human (and other) life;
to engage in such social, educational, legal and cultural activity as will be useful and beneficial to
members of American Atheists and to society as a whole.
Atheism may be defined as the mental attitude which unreservedly accepts the supremacy of reason and
aims at establishing a lifestyle and ethical outlook verifiable by experience and the scientific method,
independent of all arbitrary assumptions of authority and creeds.
Materialism declares that the cosmos is devoid of immanent conscious purpose; that it is governed by its own
inherent, immutable and impersonal laws; that there is no supernatural interference in human life; that man finding his resources within himself - can and must create his own destiny. Materialism restores to man his.
dignity and his intellectual integrity. It teaches that we must prize our life on earth and strive always to improve
it. It holds that man is capable of creating a social system based on reason and justice. Materialism's "faith" is in
man and man's ability to transform the world culture by his own efforts. This is a commitment which is in very
essence life asserting. It considers the struggle for progress as a moral obligation and impossible without noble
ideas that inspire man to bold creative works. Materialism holds that humankind's potential for good and for an
outreach to more fulfilling cultural development is, for all practical purposes, unlimited .
ATHEISTS
P.O.BOX 2117
AUSTIN,
TX 78768-2117
Send $40 for one year's membership. You will receive our "Insider's Newsletter" monthly,
your membership certificate and card, and a one year subscription to this magazine.
ON THE COVER
Dial-An-Atheist
2
18
20
FEATURED COLUMNISTS
The Big Bang Cosmogony
G. Stanley Brown
22
ARTICLES
Looking at the End of the World ~ Dyson Carter
10
Censorship of Textbooks
Continues in Texas
13
Mentioning
Editor-in-Chief
Madalyn Murray O'Hair
Managing Editor
Jon G. Murray
Poetry
Robin Murray O'Hair
Angeline Berinett
Gerald Tholen
Production Staff
Art Brenner
BillKight
Richard Smith
Gerald Tholen
Gloria Tholen
Lex Stevens
Non-Resident Staff
G. Stanley Brown
Jeff Frankel
Merrill Holste
Margaret Bhatty
Fred Woodworth
Clayton Powers
Austin, Texas
Evolution
Movement
34
The American Atheist magazine is published monthly at the Gustav Broukal American Atheist Press, 2210 Hancock Dr., Austin, TX 78756, and 1982 by Society of
Separationists, Inc., a non-profit, non-political, educational organization dedicated to
the complete and absolute separation of
state and church. Mailing address: P.O. Box
2117/Austin, TX 78768-2117. A free subscription is provided as an incident of memo
bership in the American Atheists organizetion. Subscriptions are available at $25. for
one year terms only. Manuscripts submitted
must be typed, double-spaced and accompanied by a stamped, self-addressed envelope. The editors assume no responsibility
for unsolicited manuscripts.
March, 1983
JUSTICE &
THE TRICKLE-DOWN
Just a little while ago I received a letter at the American Atheist
Center from Robert Zauner the new Chapter Director of the
Northern Virginia Chapter of American Atheists. Bob is an
attorney and he sent with his note a copy of president Reagan's
remarks at the annual convention of religious broadcasters held at
the Sheraton in Washington DC January 31st, '83. I sat and read
through the text of that speech carefully and Igrew more angry as I
read, line by line.
Over approximately sixty years now, since about the 1920s, the
federal courts and the Supreme Court of the United States have
been arduously laboring over the defining and delimiting of the
"meaning" of the establishment and free exercise clauses of the
First Amendment to the Constitution. The litigation over separation of state and church issues has been long and hard and well
fought by a variety of groups over these many years. The seventhday adventists and the jehovah's witnesses have been more
responsible than any other religious group over the years for trying
to maintain separation of state and church. These two groups
have sponsored numerous cases on the free exercise question.
The jews and the baptists have been much less active - although
more active than some of the rest of the denominations. One case
has built up upon the other to form a set of guidelines for the lower
courts by the United States Supreme Court and federal Appellate
courts for what is and is not "constitutional" when it comes to
religion and the First Amendment. Considering all the circumstances and the complexity of the fact-situations of the various
cases over the years, the Supreme and Appellate Courts have
done a pretty good job in establishing those guidelines so far.
During allof this legal process the religious leaders of our nation,
and the politicians sympathetic to them, have been eroding those
judicial guidelines in terms of the practical and logistical applications thereof. A good example of this is the battle over religious
ceremonies in public schools. The Supreme Court in two major
decisions laid down a fine and succinct outline of constitutionally
permissible activity in the public schools only to have that outline
overstepped on the local level over and over again, but politicians
and religionists obfuscate the clear thinking of the courts with
semantic games - such as the redefining of the word "prayer"
with the synonymous terms of "meditation" (silent or transcendental) and "silence" or "thought" (moment of - or secular).
In real terms, then, all of the perspiration and inspiration of the
courts has become functionally advisory in nature. Getting the
local yahoos to heed that advice has been quite a different story.
The moral to the story is that the religious never give up.
Fanaticism, in all of its "glory," is basic to christianity and the
christian ethic. There is little difference between being willingto die
en masse in a crusade or for a Jim Jones and being willingto sink
your teeth into the posterior of a principal or a school board
member until junior has the "right" to be forced to pray or watch
prayer or has the "right" to be free of intelligent reading material.
Religious tenacity and fanaticism make good bedfellows. The
intellectual and scientific set has, on the other hand, traditionally
disdained the "street fighter" image and style, preferring the
Page 2
March,1983
THEORY
March,1983
Page 3
.'
,.
r,.
. b
11-
This paper is the culmination of a series of papers designed to lay a foundation for presenting the current best
description of events in the very distant past. Those papers discussed topics in relativity, distance determinations, stellar
evolution, and cosmological observations. They appeared in this journal in Volume 23, Numbers 8,11,12 and Volume 24,
Numbers 3,6, and 11. Other writers, Thomas Gurley, William Reynolds, and Ralph Shirley have written papers on the
subject which appeared in Volume 22, Numbers 10 and 12. This paper will discuss the astronomical evidence, give a
history proceeding chronologically backward and deal with theistic implications some individuals find in the physics of the
"Big Bang."
THE COSMOLOGICAL
EXPANSION
Astronomers have methods to estimate the distance to
galaxies of stars (American Atheist, Vol. 23, No. 12, p. 9).
They can also measure the speed of those galaxies (Amencan Atheist, Vol. 24, No. 11, p. 18, "Red Shift"). They find
that in all directions, there are galaxies and clusters of
galaxies and they are moving away from us. The speed of
movement depends directly on distance, so that any galaxy
increases its distance from us by 1%in two hundred million
years. Thus one galaxy which is twice as far away as another
willmove twice as far and twice as fast as the other during
any period of time. The fact that galaxies appear to be
"Astronomers ... find that in all directions, there are galaxies ... moving away from
us. The speed of movement depends directly on distance, so that any galaxy
increases its distance from us by 1%in two hundred million years."
moving away from us does not indicate that we are located
in the center of the universe. Rather, the proportionality of
speed to distance indicates that the same expansion would
be seen by any observer in any galaxy. For example, we can
imagine five equidistant galaxies moving along a line, as
indicated in Figure 1.The view of the inner three is indicated
for each. They see their adjacent neighbors (A) in opposite
directions all receding with the same speed.
Page 4
March,1983
Of---+"
o
o
"'--0
Figure
--+
COSMIC HISTORY
If we consider the universe with time going in reverse,
then we have a contracting universe. It is interesting to
consider the changes that take place in such a world. The
most important change willbe in the density, or amount of
matter per unit volume. As the volume goes down, the
density goes up. An accelerating increase in density is
inevitable, because volume depends on the cube of the
distance. Consider children's building blocks. Eight are
required to assemble a block twice as high, wide, and deep
as a single block. Thus, if the distance between galaxies is
reduced to one half, they will be crammed in a space oneeighth as large, and the density of space will go up by a
factor of eight.
kind. They calculate temperature and the effects of radiation. They use giant multimillion dollar particle accelerating
machines to provide experimental evidence to check their
calculations. They check each other's work and investigate
at ever higher energy levels.
The work so far indicates that hydrogen atoms, the most
abundant element in the universe, were formed between
three hundred thousand and one million years after the
start of the expansion. Prior to this the temperature was so
hot and the radiation so intense that electrons could not
combine with protons to form hydrogen atoms. Such
conditions create strange physics. Before atoms existed the
energy density of radiation was greater than the density of
matter. Radiation effects became a primary consideration.
Prior to the attachment of electrons with protons, the
universe was not transparent. It was a hot fog. The reason is
that when the electrons and-protons are zipping around by
themselves, their electrical charge interferes with light. The
direction and energy of light rays is altered with each
encounter with a charged particle. After electrons and
protons get together and cancel each other's charge, light
can pass on unimpeded. So if we are ever able to peer
deeply enough into space to see far enough back in time to
this atom-forming stage, we willsee this fog. And we willnot
be able to see events at an earlier time because they are
beyond the fog.
An atom is an entity complete with at least one proton
and one electron. These separate components formed at
the earliest phase of the expansion. Within one second
electrons appeared out of the intense radiation field. Within
one millionth of a second from the start of the expansion the
more massive protons and neutrons appeared. The temperature at this time was so high that particles and their
antiparticles were being continuously" created" and annihi-
". . . hydrogen atoms, the most abundant element in the universe, were formed
between three hundred thousand and one million years after the start of the
. "
expansion.
Research indicates that the universe is about twenty
billion years old. So ten billion years ago there was eight
times as much matter in large volumes of the universe. And
fifteen billion years ago there was sixty-four times as much
matter. The present average density of the universe is
approximately one hydrogen atom per cubic meter. The
third power law indicates that if we go back within the first
few decades of the expansion we willfind an average density
as high as the density of air. But other effects invalidate this
estimate. The collapse of space will increase the energy'
density of radiation (light, heat, radio, etc.) and temperature
and pressure will rise dramatically.
"Withinone second electrons appeared out of the intense radiation field. Within one
millionth of a second from the start of the expansion the more massive protons and
neutrons appeared."
Nuclear physicists have a field day when they work on
problems of what was going on in the earliest phases of the
expansion. They calculate when the atoms and elementary
particles appeared and the relative abundances of each
Austin, Texas
March,1983
PageS
"The significance of the low temperature thermal radiation field seen in all
directions lies in the fact that the expanding model (of the universe) predicts it."
It may be objected that the ratios found today do not
represent Big Bang production. Rather perhaps deuterium
and helium formed in stars since the initial time. The papers
on stellar evolution (American Atheist, Vol. 24, Nos. 3 and
6) explain how to discriminate between young and old stars.
An old star contains the primordial (Big Bang) abundance
ratio in its atmosphere, free of contamination by helium
formed in its core. The observed ratio is what is predicted
by our interpretation of the initial conditions. Deuterium
cannot be made in stars or supernovae because it will be
destroyed almost immediately by high core temperatures
lasting too long. But these temperatures are so transient in
the initial expansion that the observed abundance could
have been produced, remaining the same for billions of
years to the present.
The significance of the low temperature thermal radiation
seen in all directions (American Atheist, Vol. 24, No. 11, p.
19) lies in the fact that the expanding model predicts it. After
atoms had formed, the radiation field assumed a form
(distribution) relating intensity to frequency in the manner
seen for all high density matter. As time passed, the
"... a static universe would be expected to collapse due to the mutual gravitational
attractions of the galaxies, yet we see no evidence for contraction."
distribution shifted as would be expected for;an expanding
space and exists in a form today which matches the
observations.
OBJECTIONS TO EXPANSION
While the red shift (American Atheist, Vol. 24, No. 11, p.
18) is a fact, some ideas other than racing away from us have
been proposed to explain it. A popular alternative is "tired
light." Suppose that in crossing the vastness of space
between galaxies light is weakened by some unknown effect
and this manifests itself as the red shift. Light traveling
greater distances should be more weakened and more
reddened, as is observed. So the galaxies are not moving,
their light is tired.
Radio astronomy is a help here. Radio waves from distant
galaxies have been measured and they are red shifted in
Page 6
March,1983
A more careful reading of the Second Law of Thermodynamics informs us that there are two kinds of energy _The
first is ordered and is available to do useful work. The
second is disordered and cannot be applied to create order.
The sum of the two is constant in an isolated system, with
the disordered part always increasing with time. But the
ordered part can be applied to create more complex
systems. There is so much energy available in the universe
that we can use a lot to create more order, and ignore the
even greater amount of energy put to useless disorder
during our efforts.
"... a clear distinction should be made between two kinds of universe: the universe
and the visible universe. The universe is all there is, but a visible universe expands at
the speed of light starting at the time of expansion."
The formation of elementary particles represents an
increase in order, which was accompanied by energy
becoming unavailable to create particles. The formation of
galaxies was an increase in order, accompanied by still
more energy becoming disordered and unusable to make
anything. The sun converts mass to usable and unusable
energy. Ifthe earth were isolated from the sun, things would
get more disorganized here quite rapidly. But the sun keeps
pumping usable energy to us, and we use some of it to get
more organized, while simultaneously converting some of it
to permanently unusable disorder.
OBVIOUS QUESTIONS
The foregoing has been a discussion of what is now
known about what preceded the present. Astronomical
data, given the best available interpretation, indicates that
the universe is expanding. By reversing the process in our
minds, we find a very hot dense universe. So what preceded
this inhospitable phase? Science has yet to provide the
answer. Trying to give an answer to this question is
somewhat like trying to say what is north of the North Pole.
Our universe in both space and time had a beginning and
that beginning is the Big Bang. Ifthere was a prior universe,
all information about it was obliterated during the extreme
conditions which have been described.
March, 1983
Page 7
IMPLICATIONS
Scientists use mathematics as an aid in their research into
our world. With it they can create mathematical models of
phenomena. On a most basic level, the sequence of real
numbers suggests a model for physical reality. Figure 2
provides a few of the numbers near zero. We see that it is
always possible to add 1 to any number and progress
toward positive infinity. Likewise, the numbers permit
NEGATIVE
INFINITY
I
-3
-2
,
-1
POSITIVE
INFINITY
I
1
Figure
I
3
BIG
DGO
PAST
present
-.;-.;,------~I---.....;~~~~
FUTURE
TWO ASTRONOMERS
BANG
Figure
In a book copyrighted
in 1978, Robert Jastrow,
a
professional astronomer, has described the research leading to confirmation of the expansion and Big Bang. He
writes that he is fascinated by parallels between the recent
scientific findings and the old theological assertion: specifically, both say there was a beginning. Jastrow highlights the
reluctance of world renowned physicists to accept a denial
of an infinite past. In contrast, he asserts, theologians have
expected this development and therefore are ahead of the
scientists.
It is true that scientists developed an alternative theory to
fit both an infinite past and an expanding universe. Support
for that theory has now been relinquished by astronomers
due to progress in research. It is true that theologians have
anticipated
a beginning, but here the similarity stops.
March,1983
Page 8
"..
* * * * * * * * *
REFERENCES
The Big Bang, by Joseph Silk, W.H. Freeman & Co. 1980.
Cosmology <L, compiled from Scientific American, published by
W.H. Freeman & Co. 1977.
God and the Astronomers, by Robert Jastrow (and others),
Warner Books. 1978.
Note: The author cannot answer all of his mail. Any questions
directed to him must be specific.
March,1983
~
Page 9
by Dyson Carter
Those who had voted for Reagan's promised sweeping
changes had not even imagined that "the good old days' he
talked about included horrifying new weapons never
before seen on our planet.
What about prosperity?
What about lower taxes?
What about full employment?
These features of bygone times the new White House
didn't recognize.
March,1983
March,1983
Page 11
DARWIN REVISITED
For many years now Charles Darwin has been intellectually indicted for allegedly taking a position inferring direct
descendance of modern humans from the monkeys and/or apes which are familiar to us today. Darwin never made any
such claims at all! His position regarding evolution was - all species are simply evolutionary descendants of previously
existing more primitive ancestors. This, of course, would include present-day "apes and monkeys" as well. Modern
humans and other modern-day primates may, or may not have had a "common ancestral" link in the mammalian class.
Anthropological researchers must eventually make such determinations.
It does seem rather strange, however, that modern man - with his "magnificent brain" - would revert back to a
"desired" position of "sheep" in the quest for ongoing religious mythology.
Perhaps christian cultists never really bridged the evolutionary gap!
- Gerald Tholen
Page 12
March,1983
"... The textbook designed for the lucrative Texas market is used throughout the
country, so the enormous influence of Texas shapes the contents of America's
textbooks."
a religious, fundamentalist, creationist husband-and-wife
team whose sole business is reviewing textbooks. This
couple is known in education circles throughout the nation
as the most effective textbook censors in the country. They
have been promoting their narrow fundamentalist views for
over twenty years by criticizing and influencing the removal
of textbooks that contain material opposed to their views.
Some of the Gabler's objections to the Scott, Foresma~
Austin, Texas
March, 1983
Page 13
J
9
Biology II
reasoned empirical inquiry and weight of evidence.
4. The stipulation that textbooks must present evolution as theoretical rather than factually verifiable is
educationally misguided for two reasons: first, evolution can and should be presented as both factual and
theoretical; second, even evolutionary theory is subject to testing and verification and should not therefore be presented as being devoid of factual content,
as does Section 1.3. In the context of the Proclamation, the scientific concept of "theory" is presented in
the nonscientific sense of "speculation" or "guess,"
and this again is a misrepresentation of science.
5. The notion that a science textbook will be "edited"
or "modified" to conform to the desired treatment of
"... Other popular explanations for the origin of humankind, such as creationism, are
myths, are not scientific .... Requiring the treatment of other explanations in public
school textbooks is not only another misrepresentation of science, it is an
unconstitutional establishment of religion."
2. Evolution is the only currently held scientific
explanation for the origins of plants and animals,
including humankind. Other popular explanations for
the origin of humankind, such as creationism, are
myths, are not scientific, and therefore should not be
presented in science textbooks as legitimate scientific
theories. Requiring the treatment of other explanations in public school textbooks is not only another
misrepresentation of science, it is an unconstitutional
establishment of religion, since the other explanations
are religious in content and origin.
3. Teaching the fact of evolution cannot possibly limit
young people in their search for meanings of their
human existence, although it willundoubtedly conflict
with any creationist explanation of human existence
that requires acceptance by faith rather than by
Page 14
March,1983
Furthermore, this requirement is again unconstitutional, since its inclusion was motivated by religious
concern rather than any secular purpose, its intent is
to promote the doctrine of creation by suppressing
the teaching of evolution, and it excessively entangles
the State of Texas in religious affairs, specifically,
belief in creationism.
The president of the Texas Council for Science Education has stated that "No scientific theory has ever needed
legislation, resolutions, lobbying, or state agency regulation
to make it acceptable as good science which deserves to be
taught to students. If a theory has this need, as does
creationism, this is evidence that it is not legitimate science
and thus should not be taught in school science classrooms." He states that he is convinced that Section 1.3 was
promulgated for religious reasons, is a violation of churchstate separation and is therefore unconstitutional. He is
convinced of this because he talked to some of the State
Board of Education members who were responsible for
writing and passing Section 1.3. Former Board member
Johnnie Marie Grimes believes that evolution is "a powerful
force against the spiritual dimension of man," and that ifwe
teach it as a demonstrated scientific fact, then our public
schools will be a "barrier" to the christian and jewish
religions. Board member William Kemp calls scientists
"narrow-minded and bigoted" for preferring to accept
evolution rather than believe creationism. He made these
remarks to the president of the Texas Council for Science
Education when the latter suggested that Section 1.3 was a
misrepresentation of science. He also threatened that
scientists "willonly get something worse ifyou try to change
the current regulation." Board Chairman Joe Kelly Butler
says that scientific knowledge is only the "opinions" of
scientists and that such opinions are "irrelevant" to how the
State Board should treat the topic of evolution. He maintains that the present policy is "about as good as we can
do." He was not interested in a statement signed by
scientists protesting' Section 1.3, saying that the "opinion"
of scientists would not change his mind; however, a
statement signed by the regents of the University of Texas
and Rice University against the Proclamation might cause
him to alter his view. Presumably, the other Board members
share these fundamentalist anti-scientific sentiments.
The most important evidence for the religious intent
behind Section 1.3, however, is the history of its adoption in
early 1974. The facts of the origin of Section 1.3 were
recently discovered by the Texas Council for Science
Education during research into the history of the Texas
Textbook Proclamation and textbook adoption policy. It
was discovered that Section 1.3 was adopted largely in-its
present form at the urging of the couple from Longview! In
their letter to the Commissioner of Education, dated
August 10, 1973, the couple protested the teaching of
evolution in the State's schools. They complained that the
biology textbooks taught evolution as a fact, not a theory,
and omitted any reference to creation. They asserted that
"textbooks completely censor the fact that there is more
scientific evidence against than for evolution. THIS DENIES STUDENTS THEIR ACADEMIC FREEDOM TO
LEARN ... Strictly speaking, evolution is not a science
because it cannot be proven - it must be accepted on
FAITH as a philosophy or as a religion. . . Textbooks
include evolutionary DOGMA with none of the important
Austin, Texas
, - .:.."~~:~S<..->;~:
-.'-i-
~""">
_,
..
",,'
:JiIP'
~1
March,1983
Page 15
"The impact on textbooks brought about by the Texas State Board of Education's
action was dramatic. The post-Sputnik increase in quality of the biology textbooks
was halted and reversed in '74.Since then, many biology textbooks have been revised
to reduce the amount of space devoted to evolution and to present the subject in
more tentative terms."
The letter was convincing enough to the State Board of
Education that they adopted what is now Section 1.3 of the
Proclamation on May 11, 1974. Although the couple from
Longview had asked that either equal space for scientific
creation be included in textbooks or evolutionary dogma be
deleted. the State Board found that, because of prior
decisions, they couldn't do this. Therefore, the current
wording was chosen by the Priorities Committee to come as
close as possible to the couple's demands without violating,
in their estimation, case law. The official State Board of
Education Minutes for May, 1974 reported that because of
the changes in the 1974Textbook Proclamation, the couple
"had withdrawn the complaint" and the new policy "was
satisfactory" to them. Paragraph (3) of Section 1.3 was
added to the Proclamation in 1977 by William Kemp. Why
this was thought necessary is not known, but Kemp's wellknown anti-evolution prejudices suggest that he thought a
further inhibiting factor was necessary to insure that public
school students were protected from the pernicious dogma
of evolution.
"... Since publishers have written their pre-college science textbooks to comply with
the Texas Proclamation, the educational results have been uniformly regrettable.
Textbooks include equivocations and misrepresentations about evolution, have
reduced coverage of evolution, ... and even include pro-creationist statements."
The president of the Texas Council for Science Education maintains that the arguments used by the couple from.
Longview in their letter to the Commissioner of Education
were fallacious and misguided. He claims that it is plain from
their letter that they "know nothing about science and that
their motives are due purely to their fundamentalist religion." He further maintains that the State Board acted
irresponsibly in writing the anti-evolution section of the
Proclamation to appease the couple. He laments that "of all
the mischievous influence (they) have had on textbooks in
the United States, their scientifically ignorant letter has had
by far the greatest negative impact on science education in
the entire country during the past nine years. It is absolutely
incredible that such a misadventure could take place in the
United States in the latter half of the twentieth century, and
Page 16
March,1983
ton Mifflin's Investigating the Earth, a team-written textbook sponsored by the American Geological Institute.
Some biology textbook writers have received letters from
their publishers asking them to leave the topic of evolution
out of their books.
.
Allof these science textbooks are being used throughout
the country, and all were written to conform to the Texas
Textbook Proclamation. The Texas Council for Science
Education finds Section 1.3 to be a violation of academic
freedom, a device of state censorship, a misrepresentation
of science, an unconstitutional regulation, a disgrace to
Texas, and a tragedy for science education in the United
States. It says: "Since publishers have written their precollege science textbooks to comply with the Texas Proclamation, the educational results have been uniformly regretThe American Atheist
table. Textbooks include equivocations and misrepresentations about evolution, have reduced coverage of evolution
to a couple of pages or nothing, omit any connection
between evolution and other biological phenomena, and
even include pro-creationist statements. The result has
been that high school graduates have received a censored,
second-rate biology education in most schools in the
country. It is regrettable that a state agency can unilaterally
regulate the content of science textbooks; it is tragic that
this censorship has had a dramatic and pejorative effect on
the quality of biology and geology education for students all
over the United States." Dr. Steven Weinberg, Nobel
Laureate and Professor of Physics at the University of
Texas, stated in an interview with the University magazine,
~------ -
1,
-----
w.
, ,
"
_2
+,
\\you've
Austin, Texas
GOT
Page 17
March,1983
"There were, and there are perhaps still, two modes of reconciliation of scripture and
science, which have been each in their day attempted, and each has totally failed."
were the result of adam's fall. He declares in his sermon on
God's Approbation of his Works that "before the sin of
adam there were no agitations within the bowels of the
earth, no violent convulsions, no concussions of the earth,
no earthquakes, but all was unmoved as the pillars of
heaven. There were then no such things as eruptions of fire;
no volcanoes or burning mountains." He goes further and
insists that earthquakes are "god's strange works of
judgment, the proper effect and punishment of sin." Wesley
took this same attitude about death and pain, even as these
appertain to animals. In his Fall of Man he says of birds,
beasts and insects that before sin entered the world by
adam's fall, "none of these attempted to devour or in any
Austin, Texas
March,1983
Page 19
dluaUon
a.1111ons
of y.ar.
l'1od
rox)
+ - lut
toe.n.
"
55
ae
'a1eet
1.
50
GEOLOGICAL
TIME
pan
SCALE
890
:\.
DIAL-AN-ATHEIST
CHAPTERS OF AMERICAN
ATHEISTS
(512) 458-5731
(602) 623-3861
(201 ) 777-0766
Phoenix, Arizona
(602) 267-0777
(505) 884-7630
S. Francisco, California
(415)' 974-175q
(518) 346-1479
Denver, Colorado
(303) 692-9395
(704) 568-5346
(305) 584-8923
(405) 677-4141
(813) 577-7154
Portland, Oregon
(503) 287-6461
Atlanta, Georgia
(404) 329-9809
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
(215) 533-1620
Chicago, Illinois
(312) 772-8822
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
(412) 734-0509
Evansville, Indiana
(812) 425-1949
Houston, Texas
(713) 664-7678
lexington, Kentucky
(606) 278-8333
(801) 364-4939
Boston, Massachusetts
(617) 969-2682
lynchburg, Virginia
(804)993-2525
Detroit, Michigan
Eastern Missouri
(313) 721-6630
(314) 771-8894
Northern Virginia
(703) 370-5255
(804) 428-0979
Page 20
March,1983
Page 21
March, 1983
Austin, Texas
ISKON
(INTERNATIONAL
"Nothing flatters the racially-minded Indian more than to see these white witless
morons flat on their faces at the feet of gurus and godmen."
Bhaktisvarup hails from Manipur in northeast India and
after passing his M.Tech. from Calcutta University, went on
to an M.S. in Chemistry from Canisius College, Buffalo. In
1974 he was awarded a Ph.D. in Physical Organic Chemistry from the University of California. Later he became a
Research Fellow at Emory College, Atlanta. With such an
impressive string of qualifications he manipulatively implies
that it was "inevitable" that he should devote all his
experience to the "science" of religion! The institute was
founded with the "divine" purpose of presenting ancient
Page 22
March,1983
"He (the hindu godman) talked very seriously that in our modern civilization the
breakdown of moral and ethical principles especially in the western society ... is due
to this (Materialist and Atheist) sort of teaching in the the colleges and universities."
"It doesn't teach us self-reliance - only about atoms and
molecules. And when those atoms and molecules finish, we
also finish." In other words, it ignores the "spiritual"
existence. Scientists study life"superficially," from outside
and ignore the "spiritual spark of the spiritual atom" inside.
This "stupid" refusal on the part of modern science to
discern the non-visible through the microscope, and believe
in the non-existent in the laboratory is its greatest "defect."
Otherwise we would not need bhaktivedanta institutes!
However, the director was prepared to concede that
scientists are "doing a great job. There is nothing wrong
with science. It is a special genius. But all this could be much
more meaningful if they realized that life has a spiritual
element."
At which point does scientific religious research on the
soul really start?
At zero actually, because, according to the bhaktisvarup,
"We first agree that there is a nonphysical entity. This
nonphysical entity is called life. It is nonphysical and
nonchemical, but it interacts with the material and chemical
elements."
On this "unshakable, unverifiable, no-nonsense" foundation rests the entire scientific edifice of "atmagyan." You
simply cannot go wrong once you acquire the genuine
understanding that life is a nonphysical phenomenon and
the spiritual atom or the "atrna" is quite distinct from the
material or physical atom!
In all this woolly pontification, nowhere did the bhaktisvarup reveal exactly what laboratory tests were expected to
prove the science of the soul's existence. But evidently it
takes a particular kind of scientist. "Only that individual
who understands the physical molecule of lifeas well as the
spiritual molecule can see how one complements the other,
how knowledge and material phenomena interact." He then
proceeded to explain how even enzymes display a certain
intelligence. "Say, when you take a protein molecule. In
each stage certain types of special enzymes are required.
These enzymes have to be there at the right time and at the
right place, they can never be replaced by anything else. But
there are innumerable enzymes. How does that selection
take place at that particular time and place and everything
in perfect order, perfect systematic organization? By seeing
that, you can come to the sensible conclusion that there is
an intelligence even in the molecular leve!' What I mean is
that there is some intelligent system that organizes and
directs even in the cellular platform or molecular and
submolecular leve!'''
Austin, Texas
March,1983
Page 23
+ + + + +
tScience Digest is a singularly bad example of science
journalism. Brought to you by the same people who
invented yellow journalism -the Hearst family, it regularly
suggests that the supernatural might be "real" with questionable trivia elevated into monumental enigmatic "facts"
generously laced with sensationalist graphics. - Ed.
2Abdus Salaam, one of the top theoretical physicists
today and also a recent Nobel prize winner, believes in the
koran so much that when he received his Nobel prize he got
on his knees and praised allah. Yes, folks, if a scientist here
and there makes a fool of himself publicly asserting his
religiosity while other the other timid scientists remain silent
out of fear of the public reaction, you can be sure that his
testimony is "reliable!" - Ed.
31ncludingplants and bacteria? We doubt he said what he
is alleged to have said. - Ed.
4Tsk, tsk, good man. It's not all that bad. - Ed.
-'
~<'C!
).
\!;;e
E!>
Page 24
March,1983
from common
an attack that
threatens their very existence. The author, who has covered American education since the 1950s,
describes the nature of the threat and of the New Right itself.
Editor's Preface:
In thid article the author speaks extensively of "secular
humanism." As he explains this, one can see how humanism has been comingled with religionsince its inception
as an idea - with the credit for the same given to Erasmus,
who was a roman catholic.
When the enemy tries to obfuscate the issue and when
those who should be openly Atheists confuse the issue by
hiding behind the "acceptable" term of "humanism," the
Austin, Texas
March,1983
Page 25
not seem to know what to do about education; consequently, it is doing little but waiting for signals - from someone.
3. The new right controls and uses potent tools for
propaganda,
promotion, fund raising, and proselytizing.
The mailing list (25 million names!) developed by Richard
Viguerie has become legendary, and rightly so. Through its
use, conservative organizations
have built large memberships and raised millions of dollars.
"The new right controls and uses potent tools for propaganda, promotion, fund
raising, and proselytizing. The mailing list (25 million names!) developed by Richard
Viguerie has become legendary, and rightly so ....
it would be foolhardy to
underestimate the numbers who are reached by new right preachers and evangelists."
The alienated, the disappointed, and the irate gathered
under the banner of an aberrant conservative movement a movement that includes concerned mothers and fathers
but is led by zealots and extremists. Some manifestations of
the movement are rational. But its rabid core, now known
as the "new right," has loosed the dogs of war against the
public schools, using the accumulated ire of some segments
of the population as a justification to wage warfare against
the schools for what they have done and are doing, as well
as for what they are not doing that the zealots wish them to
do.
March,1983
Page 26
"The new right uses propaganda skillfully, recklessly, and irresponsibly. Its leaders
know that slogans, sloganeering, and scapegoats are major ingredients of effective
propaganda."
5. The new right works on many fronts and seeks to
influence a multitude of publics. Hardly anyone is ignored.
New right leaders aim first at parents and taxpayers, then at
school board members, school administrators,
teachers,
state legislators, and, of course, national lawmakers.
Helping to promote the various causes of the new right is
a network of national, state and local agencies. First, there
are the "think tanks," which develop policy and philosophy
and deliver them to the seats of power - as they did for
Ronald Reagan and the Republican party in the pre-election
and postelection days. Closely following the "think tanks" in
influence and power are the political action committees,
which seek to eliminate liberal members of Congress and
state legislatures by working for the election of conservative
ideologues. Then come a variety of interlocking and mutually supporting organizations, which have as their aims:
*developing and propagating "model" legislation for
states;
*promoting prayer in public schools
*promoting creationism
*censoring textbooks and schools library books;
*ending unionism and union tactics in education;
*promoting the interests of christian schools
*cutting taxes and school expenditures;
*nurturing conservative ideas;
*fighting "secular humanism" in public schools; and
*channeling corporate gifts and funds into colleges
and universities that promote "free enterprise."
Many of these same groups, regardless of their specific
cause, also promote brands of morality, godliness, Americanism, patriotism, and free enterprise. Finally, there are
kindred groups that attack the mass media, consumerism,
and environmentalists
while promoting ownership of guns
Austin, Texas
In this same letter the senator lists the positions the NEA
has taken as he finds them in NEA convention resolutions.
They include, says the letter: legalizing possession
of
marijuana, requiring all public employees to be unionized,
federal financing of abortions, allowing teachers to select
instructional materials without any review by local school
boards, and allowing practicing homosexuals to teach in the
schools.
The new right uses all the classic propaganda techniques:
the big lie, the little lie, the distortion,
the glittering
generality, the innuendo, the smear word, the fanning of
fears, the incitement of passion.
March, 1983
Page 27
March,1983
1.
Secular Humanism
"... new right leaders are concentrating their efforts on Congress, where they hope
to gain signal victories, the biggest being the shackling of the judiciary."
But such matters do not perturb the gurus of the right,
such as Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah and Sen. John East of
North Carolina, both Republicans. They are now thumping
for legislation that would authorize the reopening of every
segregation case since Brown v. Board of Education. The
original order against segregation in every case since Brown
could be dissolved and judges prohibited from ordering any
new remedies for segregation.
Authorities on constitutional law - law liberal and
conservative alike - describe such legislative proposals as
"astounding" and "shattering." Their view is that the HatchEast plan would overrule the power of the Supreme Court,
killthe concept of judicial supremacy, demolish the system
of checks and balances - and, in consequence, bury the
principles of civil rights built during the past generation.
The new right ideology finds its fullest expression in the
proposed Family Protection Act. First introduced in 1979
by Sen. Paul Laxalt (R-Nev.), friend of the president, it has
since been revised several times. Co-sponsors with Laxalt
of the latest Senate version (S. 1378) are Roger Jepsen
(R-Ia.) and Jake Garn (R-Ut.). In the House, the measure
(H.R. 3955) is sponsored by Albert Lee Smith, Jr. (D-Ala.).
The mammoth bill contains 36 provisions. Nearly all are
an affront to the public school system and an insult to
educators.
"The ... leaders of the new right ... are ... moving ahead with three approaches that
seem most likely to enable them to achieve their goals: 1. Searching out and
destroying those elements within the public schools that promote the education of
free, inquiring minds .... 2. Limiting and controlling the learning materials in public
school classrooms and libraries through censorship. 3. Injecting into the public
classroom the quintessence of the bible - with creationism as a beginning."
The practical and hard-headed leaders of the new right
know that they cannot achieve all of their objectives in this
century. But they are working at it, moving ahead with three
approaches that seem most likely to enable them to achieve
their goals:
1. Searching out and destroying those elements within
the public schools that promote the education of free,
inquiring minds. The leaders of the new right have named
these elements "secular humanism."
2. Limiting and controlling the learning materials in public
school classrooms and libraries through censorship.
3. Injecting into the public classroom the quintessence of
the bible - with creationism as a beginning.
Austin, Texas
March,1983
Page 29
March,1983
September 1981. New Haven, Connecticut. Yale President A. Bartlett Giamatti writes a letter to the freshman
class at Yale. Said Giamatti, in part:
*A self-proclaimed moral majority, and its satellite
or client groups, cunning in the use of a native blend of
old intimidation and new technology, threaten the
values of (freedom and liberal education) ....
*From the maw of this "morality" come those who
presume to know what justice for all is; come those
who presume to know which books are fit to read,
which television programs are fit to watch, what
textbooks will serve for all the young .... From the
maw of this "majority" rise the tax-exempt Savanarolas who who believe they, and they alone, possess the
truth. There is no debate, no discussion, no dissent.
They know. There is only one set of overarching
political and spiritual and social beliefs; whatever view
does not conform to these beliefs is by definition
relativistic, negative, secular, immoral, against the
family, antifree-enterprise, un-American. What nonsense. What dangerous, malicious nonsense ....
Giamatti was safe, behind ivied walls, when he made the
statement (although he was sharply criticized by a few
alumni and in parts of the national press). But consider the
. .. teacher who is in constant danger of being purged from
her teaching job because of her opposition to moral
majority/new right policies ....
2. Censorship
"Agents of the new right are everywhere - spurring parents to leaf through
schoolbooks to search for a dirty word, an offensive paragraph."
series of reading books is attacked as "anti-family" and
The censorship issue has prompted hundred upon
subsequently replaced with another series that had not
hundreds of new right statements blasting instructional
A high school principal
materials used by public schools. Similarly, hundreds of been updated since 1958....
incidents in all parts of the US illustrate the work of the new removes all copies of Steinbeck's Of Mice and Men on a
single complaint from a parent. ... Textbook committee
right. Three brief accounts follow.
lists 13 other works "for evaluation," including those by
Denver. February 1982. Bob Stephenson, a Republican
state legislator, asks the 181 Colorado school districts to Conrad, Hardy, Hawthorne, Poe, Twain - and Homer ....
Citizens ask to see evaluation reports. _ .. School board
send him lists of books and films used in public schools ....
His plan: to send the lists to Mel and Norma Gabler for refuses to release them .... Legal action brought to get
evaluations
Many citizens still wonder what's wrong
"evaluation" ... Fifty school districts comply immediately ..
.
. . Stephenson becomes a hero of the new right. . . . with the books
The "most publicized and most significant case of school
Fundamentalists applaud his plans to root out "secular
humanism" in Colorado schools .... Stephenson schedules . censorship on record" began in September 1975 at a
statewide conference of Parents of New York United, a
hearings and announces that he will present his (or the
very conservative group. A couple of school board memGablers'?) findings to the Colorado House of Reprentatives .... He willask that state funding be withheld from bers from the Island Trees Union Free School District
(Long Island, New York), impressed by the presentations,
any school district using instructional materials with" even
hints of humanism" . . . He is chairman of the House
carried home a list of books declared offensive by schoolEducation Committee, carries clout.
Colorado Springs
book censors in other parts of the US.
Education Association hits back.
So does Colorado
Weeks later, the board members entered the school
Interchange Network (an anti-censorship group) .... Says
library at night, searched the school library at night,
Interchange: "We hope school districts willnot comply with searched card catalogs, and emerged with a list of books
Stephenson's request. ... His request violates constituthey decided were "vulgar" and "mentally dangerous."
tional safeguards .... He is abusing his power .... He is Subsequently, the school board ordered that nine books be
attempting to impose censorship of majority by minority."
removed from classrooms and school library shelves.
Follow-up statement by Interchange, supported by private
Moreover, the board decreed that the books could not be
individuals: "Stephenson's crusade poses a far greater
assigned either as required, optional, or suggested reading
threat to American freedoms than any textbook he or the because they were "anti-American, anti-christian, antisemitic, and just plain filthy."
Gablers would seek to remove from local schools .... "
"The censorship issue has prompted hundreds upon hundreds of new right
statements blasting instructional materials used by public schools."
Montgomery, Alabama. January 1982. State senate
receives draft of bill,Textbook Content Standards Act. ...
Contains more than a score of provisions, all demanded by
fundamentalists. . . . Sample: "Before state textbook
adoption agency approves a textbook, its members must be
satisfied that the materials, where appropriate, shall teach
honesty, acceptance of responsibility, respect for those in
authority, importance of the work ethic ....
" Also:
"Textbooks must emphasize importance of family, the
Austin, Texas
March, 1983
Page 31
//
.....
\.
--~~,.
r':.~~
3. Creationism
It is relatively easy for scientists and science educators to
refute the absurdities of creationism as preached by the
dogmatic fundamentalists. They're doing a good job of it in
scientific journals and at conventions of scientists and
science teachers - even though they have to keep doing it
again and again.
It was also relatively easy for the ACLU to shatter the
Arkansas law, Act 590, designed to give balanced class-
March,1983
Page 32
year. (The state ACLU director hopes for a trial by the end
of the year. Although the Louisiana law was to take effect
this fall, the state superintendent of schools has said he will
not implement it until the legal issues are resolved.) With the
aid of these principles, creationists also hope to influence
state legislatures, boards of education, curriculum directors, teachers, and textbook writers and publishers.
In an interview for this article, the following exchange
took place between the author and Robert E. Kofahl,
science coordinator, c.r.s.c.:
Q. Can one teach creationism without a word from
the bible?
A Absolutely. We don't insist that a teacher,
necessarily, bring in genesis in science instruction in
public school classrooms.
Q. Then what are you insisting on?
A What we're saying is, Open science instruction
up. Let's not have science teachers with closed minds.
Q. Do you think that science in public schools is
taught by teachers with closed minds?
A When they teach only one set of principles
geared to evolution and don't admit an examination of
another set of principles geared to divine creation, the
answer is yes.
Q. But wouldn't teaching geared to acts of divinity
be unconstitutional in public. school classrooms?
A No, because such teaching would not necessarily promote religion or belief. It would encourage true
investigation. Every student should have a right to
draw information from a variety of data pools. The
data pool developed by creationists is as good, or as
valid, as that developed by evolutionists. So we're
saying, Let's be open-minded. Look at all evidence.
Compare. Let the facts compete. Let the student
draw his own conclusion. Let's not have dogmatic
textbooks or teachers impose conclusions on the
student.
Q. But god enters into your scheme of instruction,
is that not so?
A In my personal view, I'd rather believe in an
intelligent god than in the accidental collocation of
dumb atoms.
12, published by more than a score of commercial publishers, already meet creationist criteria. This means that
these books do not "overemphasize" evolution, that creation "science" is given some prominence in them, and that
the two "models" are presented with equal emphasis.
On the other hand, a shorter list of 12 science textbooks
from major publishers does not meet the criterion of
"balance" as seen by the c.r.s.c. Among those books not
receiving the c.s.r.c. imprimatur are those of the American
Book Company, Investigating in Science and Earth Science; of Allyn & Bacon, Exploring Earth Science and
Action Biology; of Charles E. Merrill, Focus on Earth
Science and Principles of Science, Books 1 and 2; and of
Rand-McNally, Interaction of Man and Interaction of Earth
and Time. But we must not assume that these publishers
are on the creationists' blacklist. Actually, these same
publishers also produce many of the books that meet with
the creationists' approval.
Moreover, creationists are writing and publishing their
own textual materials. It's a sizable industry. Lewisville,
Texas (30 miles north of Dallas), is the home of the
sprawling publishing operations of accelerated christian
education, (a.c.e.), inc. Its warehouses and shipping rooms
bulge with textbooks, workbooks, curriculum manuals,
tests - all based on genesis. The materials are designed for
kindergarten through the second year of college. Roland E.
Johnson, head of development, says a.c.e.'s progress has
been rapid, "almost miraculous."
New protestant schools are opening at a rate of one every
seven hours, says Johnson. They need instructional materials, at a small investment, to get started, and these materials
must be bible-based. Ac.e. produces just what the 4,000
schools affiliated with fundamentalist protestant churches
need.
"We teach creationism without apology," says Johnson.
Elementary social studies workbooks open with a lesson on
the six days of creation and a reading from genesis. Each
test begins with the direction, "Ask jesus to help you."
Publishing is also a major activity for the C.S.r.c.; Kofahl is
proud of the center's "science and creation series." The
eight booklets in the series are called "supplementary
science instructional materials"; Kofahl says that they
"The warehouses and shipping rooms of a.c.e., inc., bulge with textbooks, curriculum
manuals, tests - all based on genesis."
Creationists are convinced that 1983 and the years to
come willbe bonanza years. Some 200 groups are working
to promote creationism; at least a score of these groups
work at their task with zeal and passion. In addition, state
and local wings of the moral majority support, defend, and
promote creationist ideas. Then, too, creationists are likely
to be elected to state legislatures and school boards
anywhere in the US. And parent groups often lerrd their
support to creationism in schools.
The textbook is the hope of many creationist groups. It is
through instructional materials that creationist concepts
have already reached the classrooms - and the minds of
students. Creationist achievements have been subtle and
incalculable.
No fewer than 66 science textbooks for grades 1 through
Austin, Texas
March,1983
Page 33
The leaders of the new right aim to weaken and eventually eliminate our compulsory system of education; to breach
the constitutional wall between church and state; to create
rival and competing educational operations that will bleed
the public schools of finances, students, teachers, and
"What are the designs of the new right for the public schools? Its leaders want to
imbue the education of each child with religion - preferably christian/protestant ....
They aim at nothing less than rubbing out the patterns of American public education
developed since Jefferson's day."
community support.
They aim at nothing less than rubbing out the patterns of
American public education developed since Jefferson's
day. They aim to change - now and forevermore - the
ways in which American children are to be educated.
AN ENGINEER LOOKS AT
THE CREATIONIST MOVEMENT
by John W. Patterson, Professor
Material Science and Engineering
Iowa State University
(Reprinted
Page 34
March, 1983
This paper attempts to expose the nature of the creationist movement, the role that professional engineers have
played in its leadership and the level of scientific incompetence (particularly in thermodynamics)
that these creationist engineers have exhibited both in public speaking and in
print I would hope that similarly revealing exposes will also
be forthcoming from such non-engineering perspectives as
biochemistry,
biology, paleontology,
physics, etc., but
these I will leave to those professionals whose expertise and
teaching responsibilities fall in those areas.
processes,
genetics, etc. and who are infatuated with
arguments
from design - might fall vulnerable to the
theological arguments from design. Excuses of this sort,
however, can hardly be offered on behalf of biologists, for
they have long ago been apprised of the sterility of
arguments from design, of teleology and so on in the realm
of biology. But let us return to Gish's assertions.
First of all, there can be little doubt that the foremost
creationist organizations - i.c.r., c.r.s. (creation research
society), c.s.r.c. (creation science research center), b.s.a.
(bible science association),
s.o.r. (students
for origins
research) groups on campuses about the country - are
essentially ministries. They frequently refer to themselves
as ministries and as housing writing ministries, educational
ministries and so on. As an example, the section on the i.c.r.
on page 100 of the 78/79 catalog for christian heritage
college, where i.c.r. is based, describes i.c.r. almost exclusively in terms of the various educational ministries housed
within it
Are the creationist agencies connected? Here again we
find in their own literature strong evidence of loose interconnections.
Much of the literature is virtually identical in
message. Also, one often finds the tracts and books of
different creationist groups being advertised and sold at
events sponsored
by others and they also share many
speakers. The s.o.r. campus ministries are particularly well
stocked with slide/cassette
presentations
and tracts prepared by the i.c.r. and c.s.r.c. ministries. But the most telling
evidence of connectedness
has to do with the overlapping
memberships and especially the number of key officials many of whom have been engineers - that i.c.r., c.r.s. and
c.s.r.c. have shared through the years. Henry M. Morris, a
"We can understand to some extent why engineers - who are comparatively
ignorant of biological processes, genetics, etc. and who are infatuated with arguments from design - might fallvulnerable to the theological arguments from design."
My own formal training overlaps significantly some of the
areas which the creationists have addressed. In addition to
doing research as well as graduate and undergraduate
teaching in thermodynamics,
I also hold a B.S. and M.S. in
mining engineering which, of course, is inextricably related
to the geology and the origin of sedimentary deposits. In my
view, the level of confusion, obfuscation, and incompetence
reflected by the foremost creationist "experts" both in
thermodynamics'" and in geological interpretation is appalling. And here again others strongly agree.6,.l3,lo_18,20 Of
course, the creationists do not concur with my characterization of their movement
This may be inferred from the
following assertions by Duane T. Gish, associate director
and vice president of the San Diego-based icr (institute for
creation research) ministry.F'
" ... The creationist movement is not a fundamentalist
ministry led by incompetent engineers. Rather, it is a
movement led by highly competent scientists, many of
whom are biologists. As a matter of fact, biologists
probably constitute a higher proportion of all scientific
categories within the creationist movement
.. "
Most responsible engineers will wish this were so, but I'm
afraid it is not We can understand
to some extent why
engineers - who are comparatively ignorant of biological
Austin, Texas
long time engineering professor, civil engineering department chairman, and professional hydraulic engineer,24 has
served as co-founder and/or president of all three of these
orqanizations.w.>
He was also co-founder and has been
vice-president and president of christian heritage college.25
Moreover, creationism is taught at c.h.c. for college credit
by Gish and Morris, who have held professorships
in
apologetics there.
Are engineers really all that prominent in the leadership of
the creationist organizations? The current i.c.r. letterhead
stationery lists fourteen "prestigious" technical advisors of .
whom four are engineers or engineering educators.
In
addition to D.R. Boylan - Ph.D. and Professor of Chemical
Engineering and Dean of Engineering, all at Iowa State
University= - there is also Ed Blick, former Associate
Dean of Engineering at University of Oklahoma,
now
Professor of Aerospace, Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering there.s? Also prominent on this board of technical
advisors is Harold R. Henry, Professor and Chairman of
Civil and Mining Engineering at the University of Alabama.
One of Dr. Henry's degrees is from the University of Iowa,
while his Ph.D. in Fluid Mechanics is from Columbia.w
Another technical advisor to i.c.r. is Malcolm Cutchins, a
Professor of Aerospace Engineering at Auburn, who holds a
March,1983
Page 35
"Richard G. Elmendorf,
a registered Professional Engineer and a creation
research society member,
offers $1,000 to anyone who can prove (to him) that the
earth is moving, either in rotation or translation!"
So engineers certainly are very prominent in the leadership of the i.c.r. ministries.
The creation research society rarely uses the word
"ministries" in describing itself, its missions and its goals, yet
its prominent members are by and large the same as those
of i.c.r. To join c.r.s. you must swear to a statement of belief
in the tenets of christian fundamentalism.P
The statement
commits the undersigner to the belief that all assertions in
the bible are scientifically true. It is only after signing this
statement that one may do research on creationism under
the auspices of c.r.s. In this organization,
as in i.c.r.
engineers again playa prominent leadership role.
"... I don't concur with those like Gish who pretend there are more biologists, or
biochemists, or members of some other professional group than there are engineers
in the leadership of the creationist movement."
Henry Morris, a past president of c.r.s., remains prominent on the editorial board of the c.r.s. Quarterly.34 Also on
this board is one of the creationists'
foremost thermodynamicist/engineers,
Emmett L. Williams who received his
Ph.D. in Metallurgical Engineering from Clemson. According to the c.r.s. Quarterly masthead:
Williams is
currently vice president of c.r.s. 33The engineering representative on the c.r.s. board of directors is the Dean of
engineering at Iowa State University, namely D.R. Boylan,
who also serves on the technical advisory board of i.c.r.
These three engineers - Boylan, Morris, and Williams have contributed extensively to the creationist version of
thermodynamics
through the c.r.s. Quarterly and in a more
recent book."
Among other practicing engineers who populate the
ranks of the creationist movement, there is General Electric
engineer Luther D. Sunderland, who travels the country
lobbying for creationism in schools to various state legislators. Richard G. Elmendorf of Bairdford, Pennsylvania, a
registered P.E. and a c.r.s. member, has a standing offer of
Page 36
March,1983
INCOMPETENCE ALLEGATIONS
The allegation of incompetence
is always controversial,
partly because of the seriousness of the charge and partly,
too, because we are all incompetent
in some areas. But
being incompetent need not be regarded as a serious matter
unless it can be documented in that area wherein one claims
expertise or in which he or she publishes allegedly scientific
papers. Even then, we should use something of a sliding
scale depending on one's level of education. For example,
we ought not be too harsh with an undergraduate
thermodynamics student for being inept at the Ph.D. level. We
should be harsh, however, if one flaunts himself as a Ph.D.
scientist but exhibits incompetence
at the undergraduate
The American Atheist
"We should be harsh, however, if one flaunts himself as a Ph.D. scientist but exhibits
incompetence at the undergraduate level. With creationists, interestingly enough,
this is exactly what one finds. Moreover, they often exhibit very dismal command
precisely in the subject areas wherein they profess to speak with authority."
March,1983
Page 37
proach to discourse.
In other words, the so-called "scientific creationists" have
done much to undermine the scientific credibility of creationism. They have inspired a vigorous counterattack from
legitimate scientists who ordinarily are not easily moved to
combat.
EXPLANATORY CONJECTURES
Why have engineers become so important in the youngearth, "creation-science" movement? There are two major
reasons: (A) the irresponsible attitude of engineers and
their professional societies, and (B) the familiarity of
engineers with certain difficult areas of science from which
unintelligible but authoritative sounding "apologetics" can
be developed.
Engineering societies seem to be uninterested in policing
themselves, as regards either ethical irresponsibility or
scientific incompetence. Thus engineers can publicly endorse ludicrous forms of pseudoscience without being
publicly chastised by their professional societies. Myexperience47 is that examining boards simply brand the embarrassing utterances as being outside their purview, even though
the engineer involved may be flaunting his engineering
status while proclaiming the most absurd distortions of
engineering science. Were biologists, geologists, or paleontologists to endorse publicly a pseudoscience such as
March,1983
with engineering both past and present. Thus thermodynamics - itself among the greatest of physical disciplines
- began in 1824 with an engineering analysis by the great
French engineer, Sadi Carnot. Yet today we have incompetent "modern engineers" corrupting these great ideas
before an unwitting public. Meanwhile their irresponsible
peers stand silently by, hoping sheepishly that as long as the
battleground seems to be in biology, maybe no one will see
the engineering connections.
I hope that this paper has
helped to expose the engineering incompetence
and misconduct involved, and that the following conclusions and
inferences aptly summarize the important issues.
professional
expose the
intellectual
movement.
responsible
as science.
educators,
and of their organizations,
to
extent to which scientific incompetence
and
dishonesty prevail in the "creation science"
Only then can school officials be held fully
for allowing the forced teaching of creationism
*********
REFERENCES
1W.R. Overton, "Creationism in Schools: The Decision in McLean
versus Arkansas Board of Education," Science 215, p. 934, Feb.
19,1982.
AND INFERENCES
"Public schools that willfully adopt the educational materials produced by such
incompetents deserve to be disaccredited .... It is the responsibility of knowledgeable scientists, of professional educators, and of their organizations, to expose the
extent to which scientific incompetence and intellectual dishonesty prevail in the
"creation science" movement."
4. The public utterances of the top creation scientists
-together
with their published works, which appear in
professedly authoritative
"creation science" books and
journals - provide unequivocal, documentable
evidence
that many of these authors are grossly incompetent,
not
only in the areas of science on which they expound without
proper credentials, but also int heir own professed areas of
scientific and technical expertise.
5. Public schools that willfully adopt the educational
materials produced by such incompetents
deserve to be
disaccredited, as do their responsible officials and staff.
6. It is the responsibility of knowledgeable scientists, of
Austin, Texas
March,1983
Page 39
22J.W. Patterson, "Thermodynamics and Evolution," in L. Godfrey (ed) Scientists Confront Creationism to be published by
WW. Norton, Fall (1982).
23D.T. Gish, "Creationism's Side," in Letters Column, Cedar
Rapids Gazette, June 18, (1981).
24C.L. Publishers, 21 Scientists Who Believe in Creation, p. 25,
(1977).
25D.H. Milne, "How to Debate Creationists ... ," Amer. Bioi.
Teacher 43(5), p. 235, May (1981).
26C.L.Publishers, op. cit. p. 7.
27Ibid.,p. 6.
28Ibid.,p. 15.
29Ibid.,p. II.
30Acts and Facts, 9 i.c.r. (11), p. 6. Nov. (1980).
31/mpact, No. 86, i.c.r. "The ICR Scientists," i.c.r. San Diego,
August (1980).
32Acts and Facts, 9 i.c.r. (12), p. 4, Dec. (1980).
33H.L.Armstrong (ed), "Creation Research Society," c.r.s.q. 18
(18), p. 135, Sept. (1981).
34Ibid.,See Masthead on inside front conver, Sept. (1981).
35E.L.Williams (ed), Thermodynamics and the Development of
Order, Creation Research Soc. Books, Norcross, Georgia (1982).
36R.G.Elmendorf, "5000 Reward ... " Creation/Evolution, Issue
IV.. 1, Spring (1981).
37D.R.Boylan, "Process Constraints in Living Systems," c.r.s.q.
15 (3), p. 133, Dec. (1978).
38C.L.Publishers, op. cit., p. 8.
39G.J. Van Wylen and R.E. Sonntag, Fundamentals of Classical
Thermodynamics, 2nd ed., pp. 17-19, Jonn Wiley and Sons Inc.
(1973).
4lbid., p. 21-22, 178.
4IJ.W. Patterson, E.L. Williams, D.T. Gish, and D.R. Boylan, letter
correspondence (1980).
42G.J. Van Wylen and R.E. Sonntag. op. cit. p. 235.
43J.C.Whitcomb and H.M. Morris, The Genesis Flood, Presbyterian and Reformed Publ. Co., Phillipsburg, NJ (1961).
44H.M.Morris, The Troubled Waters of Evolution, esp. p. 93-97,
Creation Life Publishers, San Diego (1974).
4sH.M. Morris, The Twilight of Evolution, chapters 3,4, Baker
Book House, Grand Rapids, MI (1963).
46H.M. Morris, "Sedimentation and the Fossil Record ... " Pp.
114-137 in W.E. Lammerts (ed) Why Not Creation? Baker Book
House, Grand Rapids, MI (1970).
47J.W.Patterson, correspondence with H.M. Morris and the Iowa
State Board of Examiners for the Licensing of Registered Professional Engineers, (1980).
48M.T ribus and E.C. Mclrvine, "Energy and Information," Scientific American 225 (3), p. 179, Sept. (1971).
49L.Hatfield, "Educators Against Darwin," Science Digest, Special
Edition, p. 94, Winter (1979-80).
50E.Schroedinger, What is Life? MacMillan, NY (1945).
SIR.P. Feynmann et aI., The Feynmann Lectures on Physics, Vol.
1, Ch. 44. p. 2, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA (1?64).
Copyright
ATTENTION!
All professions and their professional societies are eager
to maintain credibility with the public. Ultimately they
depend upon the public trust for the special privileges
required to police themselves effectively. Members of such
organizations as well as outsiders can therefore exert a
significant influence by writing inquiries to the appropriate
state boards of examiners and to the various state or
national groups when one of the profession's members
exhibits technical incompetence either in public pronouncements or in published documents. In addition, editorial
letters to the appropriate professional journals can prove
Page 40
March, 1983
of
these examples of incompetence, the corresponding organizations and journals wherein such incompetence is demonstrated should also be contacted.
hand
AMENDMENT
CONGRESS
SHALL
:r:
tTl
tTl
\/J
--l
>
OJ
\/J
:t
~
rn
Z
--l
o
'"T1
;N
rn
-z
C1
o
~
o
;N
'""0
;N
:r:
-OJ
--l
Francis J. Lally
American monsignor
Editor, The Pilot
.~
Z
C1
--l
:t
rn
'"T1
;N
rn
rn
rn
C/)
C/)
~
~
><
Q..
rn
;N
t--
\/J
::c:
-ro
tT1
~O :d03~::IH-L