Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
11/17/2014
Chapter 3 Syntax:
Grammatical/Ungrammatical VS Right/ Good wrong/bad?
Essentially language is often a tool use to discriminate against
people and often theres a perception that other languages or
varieties of a particular language are inferior but essentially all
language are forms of intricate systems with the means for people
to communicate.
Noam Chomsky
A sentence can be grammatically correct without being semantically
meaningful. Chomskys 1957 book Syntactic Structures laid out the
foundation for syntactic theory as we know it today and spurred the
beginning of modern linguistics.
He also became fascinated with syntactic ambiguity. Languages
contain systematic ways to paraphrase sentences.
o Passive Transformation
o Interrogative Transformations
Drawing Phrase Structure Trees: Page 95
Phrase Structure Rules are language specific
When determining phrase structure rules for another language, the
key thin to remember is that your rules should match your tree and
your tree should match your rules. SO if you have a iles that says
that a VP is a V NP (as in English) the tree should look like
VP=V+NP
Universal Structure of All Phrases
XP > Spec + X'
(X' > AP + X') optional
X' > X + Comp
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
CP > C + S
ADJUNCT RULES
S > NP + VP
VP > Aux + V'
Syntactic Category:
Nouns, Verbs, Adjectives
Phrase Structure Rules
VP>V NP ; NP (det)(adj) N
CP: Complementary Phrase
CP>C
Lexical ambiguity arises when at least one word in the phrase has
more than one meaning,
Principle of compositionality: the meaning of an expression is
composed of the meaning of its parts and how they are combined
structurally
Semantic Rule 1: If the meaning of NP (an individual) is a member of
the meaning of VP (a set of individuals) then the sentence is true; otherwise
false
Semantic Rule 2: is the set of individuals X such that X is the first
member of any pair in the meaning of V whose second member is the
meaning of NP
Anomaly, describes when pieces do not fit sensibly together
Metaphors, are sentences that appear to be anomalous, but which a
meaningful concept may be attached. (compositional)
Idioms, have fixed expressions whose meaning is not compositional
but rather must be learnt as a unit
Create paradoxes when used a certain way
All languages have them but they do not translate word for
word
Several kinds of Antonymy
Complementary Pairs:
Alive/dead because alive=not dead and dead=not alive
Gradable Pairs
Words do not produce an absolute scale
Big/small
Marked= not used in question of degree
Unmarked= Is used in question of degree
Eg. High/low
You wouldnt say how low is that mountain?
Relational opposites
Display symmetry in their meanings
Teacher/pupil in that If X is Ys teacher than Y is a pupil of X
Reference: Is the association to a word, as it refers to the object
Object called the referent
Sense: Provides a general understanding as the sense of the
expression
Words are related:
Synonyms
Antonyms
Homonyms
Gradable Pairs:
Relational Opposites:
Count
Mass
Eventive
Stative
Negation
Verbs have various argument structures, which describe the NP that
may occur with particular verbs.
Intransitive Verbs take only a NP subject,
Whereas Intransitive Verbs take a NP Subject, NP Direct Object, NP
Indirect object.
Thematic Roles: Express the kind of relation that holds between
arguments of the verb and the type of situation
Agent , the doer of an action
Theme, the recipient of an action
Goal, the endpoint in a change in location or possession
Source, where the action originates
Instrument, the means used to accomplish the action
Experiencer, one receiving sensory input
Verbs that contain the feature go and the feature is lined to
the presence of the thematic roles of theme, source, and goal.
Verbs that containing the feature affects mental state
Thematic Roles describing the semantic relations between a verb and
its NP arguments
OCCUR IN D-STRUCTURE