Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Copyright 2008
All Rights Reserved
Version 6.30.00
October 2008
Table of Contents
1.
2.
3.
Tutorial ..................................................................................................................... 8
3.1. Introduction ....................................................................................................... 8
3.2. Network-Based Arc Flash Exposure on AC Systems / Single Branch Case .. 10
3.2.2. Arc Flash Program: Screen 3 ............................................................. 19
3.2.3. Arc Flash Results................................................................................ 21
3.2.4. Arc Flash Annotations......................................................................... 30
3.2.5. Arc Flash Database ............................................................................ 31
3.3. Network-Based Arc Flash Exposure on AC Systems / Multiple
Branch Case ................................................................................................... 35
3.3.1. Enabling PDC ARC Flash Activity Trace ............................................ 44
3.4. Standalone Arc Flash Exposure on AC Systems............................................ 45
3.5. Network-Based Arc Flash Exposure on DC systems...................................... 51
3.6. Stand-Alone Arc Flash Exposure on DC systems .......................................... 59
4.
5.
List of Figures
Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 8 Figure 9 Figure 10 Figure 11 -
Figure 12 Figure 13 Figure 14 Figure 15 Figure 16 Figure 17 Figure 18 Figure 19 Figure 20 Figure 21 Figure 22 Figure 23 Figure 24 Figure 25 Figure 26 Figure 27 Figure 28 Figure 29 Figure 30 Figure 31 Figure 32 Figure 33 Figure 34 Figure 35 Figure 36 Figure 37 Figure 38 Figure 39 Figure 40 Figure 41 Figure 42 Figure 43 Figure 44 Figure 45 Figure 46 Figure 47 Figure 48 Figure 49 Figure 50 Figure 51 Figure 52 Figure 53 Figure 54 Figure 55 Figure 56 Figure 57 Figure 58 Figure 59 Figure 60 Figure 61 Figure 62 Figure 63 -
ii
Figure 64 - Comparison of IEEE Equations to 600 Volt Open Air Arc Test Data........................ 67
Figure 65 - Comparison of IEEE Equations to 4160 Volt Open Air Arc Test Data....................... 68
Figure 66 - Comparison of IEEE Equations to 13,800 Volt Open Air Arc Test Data.................... 69
Figure 67 - Enclosure Size Used in Test...................................................................................... 70
Figure 68 - Minimum Thermal Protection Recommended............................................................ 71
Figure 69 - Using a Shield when Racking in a Breaker................................................................ 72
Figure 70 - Schematic to Control Arc Exposure on Relayed Breakers ........................................ 73
List of Tables
Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 Table 5 Table 6 -
Note:
You can view this manual on your CD as an Adobe Acrobat PDF file. The file name is:
Arc_Flash.pdf
You will find the Test/Job files used in this tutorial in the following location:
C:\DesignBase\Samples\ArcFlash
Test Files:
Copyright 2008
All Rights Reserved
iii
Code (NEC) , Article 110.16. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) requirements are given in NFPA
70E. Alternatively, knowing the thermal capability of the protective clothing being used, the program
could indicate if it is satisfactory. In this regard, the protective level of the clothing is entered into the
program and the program gives a pass or fail result.
2.1.
Calculation of maximum short-circuit current, used for equipment evaluation, considers zero arc
resistance. When the fault does contain an arc, the heat released can damage equipment and
cause personal injury. It is the latter concern that brought about the development of the heat
exposure program. The heat exposure due to an arc can harm, or burn, bare skin or protective
clothing. The Standard for Electrical Safety Requirements for Employee Workplaces, NFPA
70E, provides information on the protective performance of various fabrics, which would limit heat
exposure to second-degree burns.
In addition to burns, there are other exposure risks to arcing faults, such as:
a. Electrical shorts due to touching energized conductors.
b. Arc blasts, due to expanding gases, that can cause flying debris, knock a person off
balance, and cause ear damage.
c. Exposure to arc plasma can result in temporary or permanent blindness.
d. Arc plasma or heat can result in a fire.
e. Metal vaporization can condense on cooler materials.
The above list of points (a-e) does not express the amount of energy in an arc. However, if you
compare the arc blast to dynamite exploding, the heat produced can ignite clothing situated
farther than 10 feet away. Clearly, any exposure to an arcing fault can be hazardous.
Zone 2 includes the load side terminals of the secondary main breaker, main bus, feeder breaker
load terminals, and tie breaker (not shown). The Zone 2 bus/breaker zone is protected by the
secondary main breaker and would also include feeder breaker racking-in and racking-out
conditions. When the secondary main breaker is not provided, Zone 1 would also include Zone 2.
Zone 3 includes the feeder breaker load terminals to the downstream device (load, sub-bus or
MCC or panel breaker). Typically, with selective protective systems, Zone 2 fault clearing time is
greater than the Zone 3 clearing time. In the Paladin DesignBase program, a dummy bus is
usually furnished with the breaker symbol on the load side of the breaker.
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
Material
Total
4.0
7.5
12.5
4.5
4.5
6.0
4.5
6.0
12.0
12.2
16.0
24-30
Weight
Rating
(Cal/cm 2)
oz/yd2
oz/yd2
oz/yd2
oz/yd2
oz/yd2
oz/yd2
oz/yd2
oz/yd2
oz/yd2
oz/yd2
oz/yd2
oz/yd2
0.5
1.0
2.0
6.0
13.8
6.1
9.1
13.7
9.2
13.1
12.5
22.6
31.1
40.0+
2
25+ to 40 cal/cm
Clothing Required
4.5-14.0 oz/yd2 untreated cotton
FR shirt and pants
Cotton underclothing plus FR shirt and pants
Cotton underclothing plus
FR shirt, pants, overalls or equivalent
Cotton underclothing plus FR shirt, pants, plus double layer
switching coat and pants or equiv.
Use Voltage
(kV)
0.5
1.0
7.5
17.5
26.5
36.0
Blast Energy
This term describes the energy released by an Arc, in the form of convection. When the Arc
occurs, the gaseous mass surrounding the area is violently displaced and heated. The energy
contained in this rapid moving mass, as it collides with surrounding objects, is called the Blast
Energy of the Arc.
2.8. References
1.
Kaufmann, R. H. and J.C. Page, "Arcing Fault Protection for Low Voltage Power
Distribution Systems - The Nature of the Problem", AIEE Transaction, PAS vol 79, June
1960, pp 160-165. (Note: the value in Table 1 should be multiplied by 2 due to the
correction with CT probe ratio.)
Alm, Emil, " Physical Properties of Arcs in Circuit Breakers", Transactions of the Royal
Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, No. 25, 1949.
3.
Brown, T. E., "Extinction of A-C Arcs in Turbulent Gases", AIEE Transaction Vol 51, March
1932, pp 185-191.
4.
Strom, A. P., "Long 60-Cycle Arcs in Air", AIEE Transaction, March 1946, Vol 65, pp
113-118, (See discussion PP 504-506 by J. H. Hagenguth).
5.
Wagner C. F., and Fountain, L.L., "Arcing Fault Currents in Low-Voltage A-C Circuits."
AIEE Transactions. 1948, vol 67, pp 166-174.
6.
R. Lee, The Other Electrical Hazard: Electrical Arc Blast Burns. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl.
Vol. 18-1A, May/June 1982, pp 246-251.
7.
R.A. Jones et al, Staged Tests Increases Awareness of Arc-flash Hazards in Electrical
Equipment. Conf. Rec. IEEE PCIC Sept 1996, pp 298-281
8.
J.R. Dunki-Jacobs, The Impact of Arcing Ground Faults on Low-voltage Power System
Design, GE publication GET-6098
9.
Lawrence Fisher, Resistance of Low-Voltage AC Arcs, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. Vol. IGA-6,
Nov./Dec 1970, pp 607-616.
10.
Richard Doughty et al, Predicting Incident Energy to Better Manage the Electric Arc
Hazard on 600-V Power Distribution Systems. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. Vol. 36-1, Jan/Feb
2000, pp 257-269.
11.
O.R. Schurig, Voltage Drop and Impedance at Short-Circuit in Low Voltage Circuits, AIEE
trans, Vol 60, 1941, pp 479-486.
12.
IEEE Std 1584-2002, IEEE Guide for Performing Arc-Flash Hazard Calculations
13.
Standard
for
Electrical
Safety
in
the
Workplace,
NFPA
70E,
2004
3. Tutorial
3.1.
Introduction
This tutorial will illustrate how to conduct ARC FLASH EXPOSURE analyses on both AC & DC
distribution systems. The exercise will be presented as explained below.
Network-Based Arc Flash Exposure on AC Systems
This application allows the user to evaluate the heat exposure caused by arcing faults, based on
an existing AC network file. Once a complete short-circuit analysis is performed on the subject
file, the relevant results are automatically passed on to the AC ARC FLASH program for analysis.
In addition to short circuit analysis data, the program is also capable of automatically reading the
tripping times of the protective devices assigned to any coordination study performed on the
network. All output reports can be directly exported into MS Excel. In terms of the analytical
standards that can be used, the user can choose between ANSI IEEE 1584, NFPA 70E or both.
Graphical outputs include Energy vs. Distance output, and printable warning labels. The program
also incorporates the ability to analyze arcing faults on buses that are fed from multiple power
supplies. In such cases, the Arc Flash algorithm will scan all the protective devices that control
the current contributions into the fault. Once the scan has been completed, the program selects
the Controlling branch: the significant branch with the slowest tripping time. Significant
branches are those branches that contribute with a 30-cycle (steady state) fault current. The
branch arcing current is computed by using the total bus arcing fault current IF and the ratio of
contributing branch to the total bolted fault current. This multiple branch processing technique
helps ensure a conservative approach and complies with all the required standards.
This section is in turn subdivided into two exercises described as follows:
Network-Based Arc Flash Exposure on AC Systems / Single Branch Case
This exercise consists of an arcing fault that occurs on a bus fed from a single branch.
The purpose is to illustrate how to build the file, run the analysis and correlate the data
input to the calculation mechanism. The file used in this example is ARCHEAT_SB.axd.
Network-Based Arc Flash Exposure on AC Systems / Multiple Branch Case
Once the mechanics of building a file have been understood from following the exercise
illustrated in the previous paragraph, this next example will show a more complex
network in which an arcing fault is fed from different sources of short circuit current, each
equipped with its own protective devices. The file that will be used in this example is
IEEEPDE.axd.
IMPORTANT NOTICE
In order for the program to analyze a bus, the user MUST specify its Arc Flash Category.
Categories are assigned from the job file editor as the file is being constructed. The screen
capture shown below, illustrates how to classify a bus directly from the editor during the
construction of the file.
3.2.
This section of the tutorial is based on the network-file ARCHEAT_SB.axd. The topology of the
network is shown in Figure 4 below in conjunction with back-annotated cycle short-circuit
results. The tripping times of the breaker protecting the motor are defined in a coordination study
that has been previously carried out on the network (Study 0: Motor PDC Study). The TCC graph
on the next page shows the phase coordination settings of the realy, along with bus and branch
fault currents.
GRI D
BUS-01
BKR-01
500 A
BUS-02
TRX-01
250 0-3-L
BUS-03
BKR-02
800 A
50
51
BUS-04
FDR-01
500 -5KV
942 6.61 A
BUS-05
112 00.52 A
10
Branch fault
current
through BKRBus fault
current
at BUS-05
11
Open the file ARCHEAT_SB.axd form EDSA2005 > Samples > ArcFlash folder.
Double click on each of the nodes/buses and make sure that a proper Arc Flash
classification has been given to each one of them. For example double click on Bus-04
to verify the Arc Flash setting as shown in figure below.
The Arc Flash designation for each node of this network is shown in the figure below. The
designations chosen are not to be considered typical; they are only intended to serve as
examples.
12
Proceed to enter/verify that all the protective devices have been properly characterized
from the short circuit point of view. In this exercise, emphasis will be made on breaker
BKR-02 since it is the one protecting the motor on BUS-05. BUS-05 will be the objective
of the following arc flash analysis. Also remember that the relay associated with this
breaker is shown in Figure 5.
Double click on BKR-02 to invoke its respective editor, and select the Short Circuit tab.
Complete all the required ANSI settings, paying special attention to the Interrupting
Time in cycles. This number is very important since it plays a role in the total time in
which an arcing fault can be cleared. In this case notice that this is a 5-cycle breaker.
Finally if there is an intentionally added Relay Trip Delay (for example, aux. Tripping
Relays), user should enter it here. For this example enter 0.
Next proceed to create a PDC study for the branch under analysis. For this example, a
PDC study has already been created and it is shown in Figure 5.
From the EDSA toolbar select the AC Arc Flash icon. Appropriate Arc Flash Toolbar will
be displayed.
13
14
Carefully read the initial Arc Flash screen and make sure that you understand the
programs usage guidelines before proceeding.
Click Next to proceed with calculations. The second screen of Arc Flash program will
open, Figure 10.
15
3.2.1.
Are not suppressed from the system (nodes are supressed by default; user needs to
unsupress them)
Have assigned Arc Flash enviroment.
User can transfer buses from Arc Flash Buses to Selected Buses field, using Add, Add All,
Remove and Remove All buttons. These commands work in common fashion as in other
DesignBase applications (Short Circuit for example). For this example we will select buses BUS04 and BUS-05 as shown in the above figure.
Also notice the Show Bus pull-down menu at the bottom of the screen, Figure 10. User can
choose one of the selected buses using this feature. All the properties of the chosen bus will be
shown in this and subsequent Arc Flash screens.
16
The first important property for the Arc Flash calculation is bus environment, Figure 11. Arc Flash
environment of the selected bus, BUS-04, is displayed in this section. The environment is
selected using the bus editor (Figure 3).
User can select/verify that the Arc Flash Equipment Category for the selected bus has been
properly assigned. The program has automatically assigned the category that was entered into
the model by the user as it was being built.
User can also select/verify that the Arc Flash Grounding Category for the selected bus has been
properly assigned. The program has automatically assigned the category that was entered into
the model by the user as it was being built.
Finally user can change grounding of all the selected buses using Grounding Control box. The
default option of grounding control is Bus Editor. Using this option user confirms the selection
done through bus editor (Figure 3). Selecting All Buses Grounded (or ungrounded) user
overwrites the editor information for all the selected buses.
User should next enter the working distance over which the Arc Flash energy is to be calculated.
The user can enter actual known values or use the IEEE 1584 defaults if deemed safe for the
application.
17
Next, select the Calculation option. In this example we will ask the program to calculate the
minimal protective clothing required for the application. Select Calculate Clothing Required. This
is a common application of the program. Alternately, user could select Test Selected Clothing in
order to verify pre-selected clothing level.
18
3.2.2.
Last Arc Flash screen is shown in Figure 14. User should refresh fault duration from PDC and
use this screen for printing the results. Before using Refresh Duration from PDC make sure that
you have already performed Protective Device Coordination (PDC) for each bus; the opening
time of device is related to the amount of Arc Flash Exposure and energy available at the bus.
Please use the Show Bus window to select BUS-05. Next click on Refresh Duration from PDC
button as indicated in Figure 14. PDC result will be displayed in the screen.
19
User can set maximum tripping time for all the buses in the system.
If the fault duration is higher than maximum tripping time, the
maximum time will be used
Tripping times that correspond to the arcing controlling branch currents are calculated and
entered into the respective fields. The user can change the trip time to represent differential
relay trip time. Detailed explanation of the results is given in Figure 15.
Breaker Opening
Time
0.08
sec
1.8 sec.
Relay Tripping
Time
20
3.2.3.
The clothing required for the IEEE 1584 calculation on the BUS-05 is shown as Category 3.
From the Calculation Standards section, user could switch over to NFPA 70E. User should
press the Calculate button to refresh the analysis results. The recalculated rating for the NFPA
70E selection instead of IEEE 1584 is, in this case, more conservative (Category 4).
Energy Plot:
To generate the respective Energy vs. Distance plot of the results, select IEEE 1584 standard
and then click on the Plot button, see Figure 17.
The red area of the plot marks the distances with energy greater than 1.2 cal/cm^2 and special
clothing requirement. Green area has energy less than 1.2 cal/cm^2. User can use the cursor to
read the energy level for various distances as shown in Figure 17.
Additionally user can zoom, save, plot or edit the properties of a generated plot using the tools
available in the plots toolbar.
21
22
Graphic Labels:
Select Graphic Label button
to generate the equipment-warning labels. Before printing
the labels, user can choose their colors and decide for which buses the labels should be printed,
Figure 18.
Labels are shown in main DesignBase window. Once labels are displayed Arc Flash toolbar will
change to enable additional manipulation with label style and appearance. Labels are shown in
Figures 19 and 20. The following are new Toolbar functions:
- Label Options. Using this function user can choose between two different label layouts.
Layouts are shown in Figures 19 and 20. User can also change the label size by using
different number of labels per page.
23
24
25
26
Work Permits:
to generate the work permits. Use the pull down menu to
Select Work Permit button
select a task for Work permit. Once the task is selected click OK and the permit will be generated.
The work permit appears as a word document, which the user can edit, print and save. A partial
sample of the work permit is shown below.
(3) Reasons why the circuit / equipment cannot be de-energized or the work deferred until the next scheduled outage:
_________________________________________________
______________________________________
Requester / Title
Date
PART II: TO BE COMPLETED BY THE ELECTRICALLY QUALIFIED PERSONS DOING THE WORK:
Check
When
Complete
____
(1) Detailed job description procedure to be used in performing the above detailed work:
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____
(2) Description of the Safe Work Practices to be employed:
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Flash Boundary
Shock Hazard
Required PPE
776.7 in
2.4 kV
3
Flash Hazard
23.8 cal/cm^2
Working Distance
Restricted Approach
26.0 in
Glove Class
Cotton underclothing plus FR shirt, pants, overalls or equivalent
(3) Means employed to restrict the access of unqualified persons from the work area:
27
35.8 in
1
____
This will create a report and save it into a Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet. Use the settings shown
below for this example and specify the name and a folder in which to save the report. Press
Save.
28
To produce the most elaborate Arc Flash report user should select detailed output report and
Both standards. User can also select custom report. The following dialog box will appear if the
custom report is selected. Using this dialog box user can choose which data is to be reported.
29
3.2.4.
User can display Arc Flash results back on the drawing using the back annotation icon from the
30
3.2.5.
At any time during the Arc Flash calculation user can view the Arc Flash database.
31
IEEE 1584 table with the appropriate coefficients used in Arc Flash calculation will be displayed if
Database > 1584 Table option is chosen.
Label Options enables the user to include/ take off particular options in Arc Flash labels.
32
33
34
Figure 38 - Network topology for job-file IEEEPDE.axd showing cycle fault results for
Bus4
35
Figure 39 - Simplified view of Bus 4 and its fault contributing branches (1/2 cycle Sym.
Currents)
The tripping times of the protective devices injected in the branches are derived from a
coordination study that has been previously carried out on the network (Study 0: BUS 4). The
TCC graph shown in Figure 34, shows the phase coordination settings of all the protective
devices.
36
Figure 40 - PDC Study for Bus 4 including all 6 connected branches. Currents are plotted
at 13.8 kV
Proceed to create your file and prepare it as explained in section 2.2. In this example, we will use
the file called IEEEPDE.axd, which is available in DesignBase2 > Samples > ARCHeat folder
and has already been prepared for the study. Proceed to open the file IEEEPDE.axd.
37
Select the AC Arc Flash command, Figure 8. Carefully read and make sure that you understand
the programs usage guidelines before proceeding, Figure 9. Click on the Next button.
38
From the pool of Arc Flash buses, select the Bus 4 and add it into Selected Buses pool, Figure
37. Verify that all the data in the Arc Flash screen appear exactly as shown in Figure 37. Click
Next to run Short Circuit analysis.
39
40
4) The path with the slowest tripping time is used as the controlling branch and the cal/cm2
is calculated from total arcing and its device tripping time
Looking at the fault currents in Figure 34, it can be determined that the greatest contribution into the
fault originates from the Tiebreaker branch (contribution from Bus 3). However, since the relay
labeled Trans f2 (contribution from Bus 2 through the Util-Transformer2) takes longer to open, it is
the Trans f2 branch that is used as the Arc Flash controlling branch, see figure below.
41
The following diagram puts in perspective the numbers obtained in the previous screen.
42
To finalize the analysis, user should click on Results to Microsoft Excel button. The following
table shows the results of the analysis using both IEEE 5184 and NFPA 70E Standards.
Table 4 - Network-based AC Arc Flash Exposure: Detailed Results
Bus Name
Protective Device Name
LL Voltage (kV)
3P Bolted Fault (Amp)
Protective Device Rating (Amp)
3P Arcing Current (kA) at 100%
Trip Delay Time (sec)
Breaker Opening Time (sec)
3P Fault Duration (sec)
Configuration
Gap (mm)
3P Arc Flash Boundary (inch) at 100%
NFPA 70E Arc Flash Boundary (inch)
Working Distance (inch)
3P Energy (cal/cm^2) at 100%
Required IEEE 1584 PPE Class
PPE Description
Required NFPA 70-E PPE Class
PPE Description
Unit System
IEEE Calculation Factor
IEEE 1584 Distance Factor (x)
Restricted Shock Distance (inch)
Bus4
Trans f2
13.8
24309
960
23.24
2. 68
0.083
2.77
Box - Grounded
153
3004
Boundary equation not valid for voltage > 600V;
IEEE 1584 3 Phase boundary = 3086.5
35.8
88.9
Extreme danger
Level exceeds NFPA-70-E - Never work on or near energized system.
4
Cotton underclothing plus FR shirt, pants,
plus double layer switching coat and pants or equiv.
US
1
0.973
26
43
3.3.1.
Detailed PDC Arc Flash navigation on the one-line along with calculated values can be viewed by
enabling the PDC Arc Flash Activity Trace. The Activity Trace is typically used for troubleshooting
as well as V&V purposes, and can be enabled by opening C:\DesignBase2\Config\PDCOORD.INI
using NOTEPAD (or other text editor) and changing the value Enabled to 1 under the section
[DebugMode]. Each bus analyzed by PDC Arc Flash will generate a trace log that pops up in a
notepad window. It is advised to turn on the Activity Trace only when analyzing one bus at a time.
) &&& Arc
44
45
Select MCC Box-Grounded environment and accept the default working distance.
Select Next to proceed to the next dialog.
46
User can review the appropriate tables using database menu, Figure 43.
47
Manually enter the tripping times for the protective devices that correspond to 85% and 100%
of the arcing current. Also enter the Breaker Opening Time in seconds. For this example,
use the numbers shown below. Also specify the Phase Gap in mm and the IEEE 1584
Calc. Factor, use the default IEEE 1584 values.
Click on the
48
49
The following table shows the results of the analysis using both IEEE 5184 and NFPA 70E
Standards.
Table 5 - Standalone AC Arc Flash Exposure: Detailed Results
Bus Name
Protective Device Name
LL Voltage (kV)
3P Bolted Fault (Amp)
Protective Device Rating (Amp)
3P Arcing Current (kA) at 100%
Trip Delay Time (sec)
Breaker Opening Time (sec)
3P Fault Duration (sec)
Configuration
Gap (mm)
3P Arc Flash Boundary (inch) at 100%
NFPA 70E Arc Flash Boundary (inch)
Working Distance (inch)
3P Energy (cal/cm^2) at 100%
Required IEEE 1584 PPE Class
PPE Description
Required NFPA 70-E PPE Class
PPE Description
Unit System
IEEE Calculation Factor
IEEE 1584 Distance Factor (x)
3P Arcing Current (kA) at 85%
3P Fault Duration at 85% (sec)
3P Energy (cal/cm^2) at 85%
3P Arc Flash Boundary (inch) at 85%
Restricted Shock Distance (inch)
Bus1
0.48
5000
0
3.627
0.35
0.005
0.355
Box - MCC - Ungrounded
25
37.2
23.7
17.9
4
1
FR shirt and pants, plus flash suit hood
3
Cotton underclothing plus FR shirt, pants, overalls or
equivalent
US
1.5
1.641
3.157
0.355
3.4
34
12
50
51
Carefully read and make sure that you understand the programs usage guidelines before
proceeding.
Select Yes in the Run Short Circuit dialog to produce the most recent short circuit results.
Press Next to continue.
52
53
Select/verify that the Arc Flash environment has been properly assigned. In this case the
environment was not assigned within the GUI. The user can still define it using Arc Flash
program. For this example we will select Open as shown in the figure bellow.
Enter the working distance over which the Arc Flash yield is to be calculated. The user can enter
actual known values or use the IEEE 1584 defaults if deemed safe for the application.
Select the Calculation Option. In this example we will ask the program to calculate the minimal
protective clothing required for the application. Select Calculate Clothing Required.
Press Next to continue.
54
Enter the tripping time that corresponds to the protective device present in the network. For this
example use 0.2 seconds as shown below.
Enter/verify the Phase Gap and the Cf factor.
Press Next to continue.
55
56
57
The following table shows the results of the analysis using both IEEE 5184 and NFPA 70E
Standards, for Bus BATT-1A.
58
BATT-1A
0.25
47734.8
11.765
0.2
Open
32
30.2
17.9
3.4
1
FR shirt and pants
US
1.5
2
10
0.2
2.8
27.6
12
59
60
61
Manually enter the tripping times for the protective devices that correspond to 85% and 100% of
the arcing current. Also enter the Breaker Opening Time in seconds. For this example, use the
numbers shown below.
Also specify the Phase Gap in mm and the IEEE 1584 Calc. Factor; use the default IEEE 1584
values.
Press Next to continue:
62
63
64
Drawing a conclusion from the data would be just an estimate. Logically a single-phase or line-toground would have less energy than a 3-phase arc, one could be conservative and use the 3phase Arc Flash results for the single-phase and line-to-ground faults. One could also deduce
that a single-phase or line-to-ground condition would be approximately 33% of the three-phase
condition and use a factor greater than 33% for an estimate. Using 40% to 50% of the threephase could be an option.
65
66
Figure 64 - Comparison of IEEE Equations to 600 Volt Open Air Arc Test Data
IEEE 1584 Eq, based on 24 inch to subject, 1.25 Inch Arc Gap, 1.0 sec
Figure 1 shows the plot of the developed equations given in the IEEE 1584 reference to the test
data for 600V tests for an open-air arc.
An open arc is one where the heat is radiated in all directions. A fault on a cable in an open tray
could be considered an open-air arc. The calories/cm2 incident energies in this article figures is
based on a surface located 24 inches (61 cm) away from the arc and for 1.0 second. The curve
labeled IEEE 1584 EQUATIONS is derived from IEEE Std. 1584 equations 1 to 6 for an arc gap
of 1.25 inches (32 cm). IEEE Std. 1584 also provides an equation based on Ralph Lees method
given in 1982 IEEE IAS Transaction paper The Other Electrical Hazard: Electric Arc Blast
Burns. This equation is used for voltages greater than 15-kV until future tests are done at higher
voltages. The curve labeled IEEE Lees Method is from an equation based on an adjustment to
Lees work. It is shown for comparison to the IEEE 1584 Equations and test data. Lees method
is simpler, since it calculates the incident energy without knowing the arc gap or the arcing
current. The IEEE 1584 Equations calculate an estimated arc current from the bolted fault
current and arc spacing. These values are then used to calculate the incident energy. At 600V,
IEEE 1584 Equations and IEEE Lees Method equation follows the higher incident energy test
values.
67
Figure 65 - Comparison of IEEE Equations to 4160 Volt Open Air Arc Test Data
IEEE 1584 Eq, based on 24 inch to subject, 4.0 Inch Arc Gap, 1.0 sec
Figures 2 and 3 show the relationship of the IEEE 1584 Equations and IEEE Lees Method
equations to the test data. In this case, some of the test data points are significantly above the
IEEE 1584 equations. In the calculations of incident energy for systems greater than 1000 Volts,
the study engineer may desire to increase the calculated values using the IEEE 1584 equations
by a factor 2.5 to ensure a safety margin or changing Cf in IEEE 1584 Equation 6 to 2.5 for
voltages greater than 1000 Volts.
68
Figure 66 - Comparison of IEEE Equations to 13,800 Volt Open Air Arc Test Data
IEEE 1584 Eq, based on 24 inch to subject, 6.0 Inch Arc Gap, 1.0 sec
Using the methods found in NFPA 70E or IEEE Standard 1584 does not ensure that burns from
an arc flash will not injure a worker. Following the NFPA 70E procedures and wearing the proper
protective equipment will greatly reduce the possibility of burns. Using the incident energy
equations, it is expected that the personal protective equipment (PPE) per the tables in NFPA
70E will be adequate for 95% of the test results used to develop the equations.
Enclosed Arcs
Much of the work around energized equipment is of the metal enclosed type. The energized
conductors are normally enclosed behind removable panels or doors. An arc in these areas is
considered in a box or in an enclosure and will be more intense and directed. The in an
enclosure measurements made by the IEEE 1584 working group gave incident energy intensity 2
to 4 times higher than an arc in open air. The two enclosed box shapes used in the tests are
shown in Fig. 5. The sketch shows the relationship of the box to the arcing electrodes. The
smaller enclosure opening does not focus the radiant energy as much as the larger enclosure
due to the ratio of the box depth to its open area. The larger enclosure tended to have a
parabolic focus of the radiant energy. The equations given in IEEE 1584 have constants that
account for fault in enclosures based on MCC or switchgear size cubicles.
69
11.5*kA__________
(Distance. from arc in feet)0.9
70
Flash Hazard
Risk Category
Range of Calculated
incident energy
Min. PPE
Rating
Clothing Required
0-1.2 cal/cm2
1.2+ to 4 cal/cm2
4+ to 8 cal/cm2
8+ to 25 cal/cm2
25+ to 40 cal/cm2
N/A
71
On new or retrofitted breakers with electric close and trip control, place the close/open
control switch on a remote or non-breaker panel.
2.
3.
Place a shield between the technician and the device being placed in service or racked in.
See Fig. 6
4.
Review protective devices to see if they can be lowered in time and pick-up.
Switchgear
Cubicle
Hi-impact plastic
shield with arm
holds
Breaker
When working on with double-ended load centers or substations with a normally closed
tie, open an incoming breaker, or the tiebreaker, to reduce the fault level.
6.
Review protective fuse sizes. Smaller fuses reduce the exposure time. This can be
significant when the arcing current, or 85% of arcing current, is not in the current limiting
range.
7.
Change relay settings when working on equipment. For many load centers, both high and
low voltages, the feeders have instantaneous set protective devices that operate and
clear the fault in 1-8 cycles thereby reducing the exposure time. The incoming main
breaker, in order to be time coordinated with the feeders, generally will not have an
instantaneous set on the protective device. The fault clearing time could be in the range
of 0.2 to 1.0 seconds. This long time greatly increases the arc exposure time and
amount of radiation a worker would receive if the arc blast pressure is not enough to
propel the worker away from the fault.
72
To limit the arc exposure on buses where the protective devices are time coordinated; the
main breaker shown in Fig. 7 could be ordered with an instantaneous protective device
and a safety switch. Normally the instantaneous protection would not be functional due
to the open contact of the safety switch. However, when work is being done on the
energized equipment, the safety switch would be turned ON and limiting the arc
exposure to the worker should an arcing fault accident occur. The time-selective system
would be eliminated for duration of the work in the interest of safety.
Electronic trips low-voltage breakers could have either their short time or instantaneous
pick-up setting lowered when work is being done on the equipment. Some
manufacturers have a disable function on the low voltage instantaneous adjustment,
which would be useful on incoming main breakers. The instantaneous would be disabled
for a selective system under normal operation and placed in service for reduced arc fault
exposure when working on the equipment.
8.
While not a way to reduce arc incident energy, it is good practice to use a buddy system.
In the event some incident should happen, help can be summoned quickly if a second
person is around.
73
Calculation Means
The calculations for arc flash incident energies and boundary distances can be accomplished a
number of ways. The reader can use the equations in IEEE Std. 1584TM -2002 after obtaining the
bolted three-phase short-circuit current and clearing times. IEEE also has made an EXCEL
spreadsheet program available with these equations for approximately $500. The user enters the
fault level, voltage, clearing time, and distance from an expected arc to the worker, and the
program provides the incident energy and boundary distance. The user would use these data to
make the labels to be placed on the electrical equipment. Software companies that provide
industrial-based electrical system analysis have arc flash hazard packages integrated with their
short-circuit and protective device packages.
Copies of the NEC, NFPA 70E, and IEEE Std. 1584TM -2002 references can be purchased from
their parent standard organization.
74
75
Publications
"Economic Selection of Voltages for Refineries", IEEE - Petroleum and Chemical Industry
Conference, San Francisco, CA, 1974.
"Stability Considerations in Paper Mills", IEEE - Pulp and Paper Conference, San Francisco, CA,
1977
"Loss-of-Excitation Protection for Synchronous Generators on Isolated Systems", IEEE - IAS
Transactions, Vol. 1A-21, No. 1, Jan/Feb 1985. Received Honorable Mention Prize.
"Standardization of Benchmarks for Protective Device Time-current Curves", IEEE - IAS
Transactions, Vol. 1A-22, No. 4, July/Aug. 1986 (co-author, T. Wolny).
"Sample System for Three-phase Short Circuit Calculations", - IAS Transactions, Vol. 26, No. 2,
Mar./Apr. 1986
"Microprocessor-Based Load Shedding Keeps Industry Systems in Balance," IEEE Computer
Applications in Power, January 1992, Vol. 5, No.1, pp. 21-24.
"Harmonics Control in Steel Mills," Iron and Steel Engineer, July 1992, pp. 25-28.
"Why Arc Furnaces Worry Utilities", Electrical World Magazine, Aug. 1993.
Designing or Specifying Harmonics Filters," Plant Engineering, March 6, 1995, pp. 68-72.
"The Effect of Demand Side Management Programs on Magnetic Field Exposure," presented at
the 28th Annual Frontiers of Power Conference, Stillwater, OK, October 30-31, 1995, (co-author:
L.J. Oppel).
"Destructive Harmonics Distortion is Byproduct of High Power Drives," New York State Facilities
Journal, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 12-13, February 1996.
"Harmonics Not Always the Culprit Say Power Engineers", New York State Facilities Journal, Vol.
6, No. 8, pp. 1, 10,11, July 1996. (Co-author Paul Steciuk)
"Shifting or Impeding Adjustable Speed Drive Harmonics," Plant Engineering, June 1997, pp. 7879.
"Don't Let Power Sags Stop Your Motors", Plant Engineering, Sept 1999, pp.76-80.
"Combine Variable Frequency and Fixed-Speed Drives for Better Economy", Plant Engineering,
April 2000, pp. 66-69.
"A Practical Guide to Short-Circuit Calculations, Conrad St. Pierre, Aug. 2001 (self published
book) Printer Thomson-Shore, Dexter MI.
76
77