Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
under
both
tension-tension
and
tension-
Name
Mathematical formula
Max. stress
Max. strain
Hill
criterion
2
2
2
1 1
2 6
1
1
2
2 1 2 F
F1 F1 F2
2 F6
Tsai Hill
2
2
2
1
1 2 2 6 1
2
F
F1
F6
F1 2
Norris
interaction
1 2 6
1
F1 F2 F6
Norris
distortional
energy
1
1 2 2 6 1
F1
F1F2 F2
F6
1 F1
; 2 F2
F
1 1 12 2 ;
E
2
F
2
2
12 E 1
1
1
1
F1
6 F6
or
6 F6
2
1
F2
or
Hoffman
2 2 F - F
1 2
2 1c 1t
1
F1t F1c F2t F2c F1t F1c
Modified
Marin
2 k 2 F - F
2 1 2
2 1c 1t
1
F
F
F
F
1t 1c
2t 2c F1t F1c
F -F
1 2c 2t
F2t F2c
2 6 1
F6
F -F
1 2c 2t
F2t F2c
2 6 1
F6
Tsai Wu
1
1
1
1
12
22
2H121 2 6 1
F6
F1t F1c F2t F2c
F1t F1c
F2t F2c
and the following condition must be fulfilled, for stability:
1
2
H12
0
F1t F1c F2t F2c
Name
10
Ashkenazi
Mathematical formula
2
1 2 6
2F121 2 1
F1 F2 F6
4
1
1
1
where: x is the global stress of
F12 0.5
2 F2 F2 F2
1
2
6
x
45o in tension
11
The same formula as Tsai Wu, but H12 takes the form:
Tsai Hahn
H12 - 0.5
12
Cowin
The same formula as Tsai Wu, but H12 takes the form:
H12
13
Fischer
1
F1t F1c F2t F2c
1
1
2
2 6 2
1
k 1 2 2 1 ; where:
F2 F2 F6
F1
1
E11 21 E 2 1 12
2 E1E 2 1 21 1 12
Where:
- (1) and (2) are the local stress components in directions (1)
and (2), respectively.
-
(F1t) & (F1c) and (F2t) & (F2c) are the local tension and
compression strength components in directions (1) and (2),
respectively.
Hill
Tsai - Hahn
Norris - Distortional Energy
Tsai - Hill
Tsai Wu
Norris & McKinnon
Case Study:
We used the local stress components of some fiber orientations [0,90o]2s,
[30o,-60o]2s, [45o]2s and [60o,-30o]2s specimens to be substituted in the
selected six criteria. This substitution has shown that all failure criteria
have the same form for the [0,90o]2s specimens, as shown in Table (2).
But for other fiber orientations there are different equations according to
the failure criterion.
[0,90o]2s Specimens
1 2 6
2 1 2 1
F1 F2 F6
F1F2
2- Tsai-Hahn
3- Norris-Distortional
4- Tsai Hill
5- Tsai Wu
1 2 6 1 2
1
F1 F2 F6 F1F2
2
1 2 6
2 1 2 1
F1 F2 F6
F1F2
2
1 6
1
F1 F6
1 2 6
1
F1 F2 F6
R=-1
R = - 0.75
R = - 0.5
R = - 0.25
R=0
R = 0.25
R = 0.5
Pure torsion R = - 1
Pure bending R = - 1
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.2
R.D.
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
1E+2
1E+3
1E+4
1E+5
1E+6
3.8
R=-1
R = - 0.75
R = - 0.5
R = - 0.25
R=0
R = 0.25
R = 0.5
Pure torsion R = - 1
Pure bending R = - 1
3.5
3.3
3.0
2.8
R.D.
2.5
2.3
2.0
1.8
1.5
1.3
1.0
0.8
0.5
0.3
0.0
1E+2
1E+3
1E+4
1E+5
1E+6
Relative damage (R.D.) applying Hill failure criterion for the [30o,-60o]2s specimens
3.8
R=-1
R = - 0.75
R = - 0.5
R = - 0.25
R=0
R = 0.25
R = 0.5
Pure torsion R = - 1
Pure bending R = - 1
3.5
3.3
R.D.
3.0
2.8
2.5
2.3
2.0
1.8
1.5
1.3
1.0
0.8
0.5
0.3
0.0
1E+2
1E+3
1E+4
1E+5
1E+6
Relative damage (R.D.) applying Tsai-Hahn failure criterion for the [30o,-60o]2s specimens
10
3.0
R=-1
R = - 0.75
R = - 0.5
R = - 0.25
R=0
R = 0.25
R = 0.5
Pure torsion R = - 1
Pure bending R = - 1
2.8
2.5
2.3
R.D.
2.0
1.8
1.5
1.3
1.0
0.8
0.5
0.3
0.0
1E+2
1E+3
1E+4
1E+5
1E+6
Relative damage (R.D.) applying Tsai-Wu failure criterion for the [30o,-60o]2s specimens.
11
3.0
R=-1
R = - 0.75
R = - 0.5
R = - 0.25
R=0
R = 0.25
R = 0.5
Pure torsion R = - 1
Pure bending R = - 1
2.8
2.5
R.D.
2.3
2.0
1.8
1.5
1.3
1.0
0.8
0.5
0.3
0.0
1E+2
1E+3
1E+4
1E+5
1E+6
Relative damage (R.D.) applying Norris & McKinnon failure criterion for the [30o,-60o]2s
specimens
2.6
R=-1
R = - 0.75
R = - 0.5
R = - 0.25
R = 0.25
R = 0.5
Pure torsion R = - 1
Pure bending R = - 1
2.4
2.2
2.0
1.8
R.D.
1.6
1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
1E+2
1E+3
1E+4
1E+5
1E+6
Relative damage (R.D.) applying Hill failure criterion for the [45o]2s specimens
12
2.6
R=-1
R = - 0.75
R = - 0.5
R = - 0.25
R = 0.25
R = 0.5
Pure torsion R = - 1
Pure bending R = - 1
2.4
2.2
2.0
1.8
R.D.
1.6
1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
1E+2
1E+3
1E+4
1E+5
1E+6
Relative damage (R.D.) applying Tsai-Hahn failure criterion for the [45o]2s specimens
13
2.8
2.6
R=-1
R = - 0.75
R = - 0.5
R = - 0.25
R = 0.25
R = 0.5
Pure torsion R = - 1
Pure bending R = - 1
2.4
2.2
2.0
1.8
R.D.
1.6
1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
1E+2
1E+3
1E+4
1E+5
1E+6
Relative damage (R.D.) applying Tsai-Wu failure criterion for the [45o]2s specimens
2.8
2.6
R=-1
R = - 0.75
R = - 0.5
R = - 0.25
R = 0.25
R = 0.5
Pure torsion R = - 1
Pure bending R = - 1
2.4
2.2
2.0
R.D.
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
1E+2
1E+3
1E+4
1E+5
1E+6
Relative damage (R.D.) applying Norris & McKinnon failure criterion for the [45o]2s
specimens
14
3.0
R=-1
R = - 0.75
R = - 0.5
R = - 0.25
R=0
R = 0.25
R = 0.5
Pure torsion R = - 1
Pure bending R = - 1
2.8
2.5
2.3
R.D.
2.0
1.8
1.5
1.3
1.0
0.8
0.5
0.3
0.0
1E+2
1E+3
1E+4
1E+5
1E+6
Relative damage (R.D.) applying Hill failure criterion for the [60o,-30o]2s specimens.
15
3.0
R=-1
R = - 0.75
R = - 0.5
R = - 0.25
R=0
R = 0.25
R = 0.5
Pure torsion R = - 1
Pure bending R = - 1
2.8
2.5
2.3
R.D.
2.0
1.8
1.5
1.3
1.0
0.8
0.5
0.3
0.0
1E+2
1E+3
1E+4
1E+5
1E+6
Relative damage (R.D.) applying Tsai-Hahn failure criterion for the [60o,-30o]2s specimens
3.8
R=-1
R = - 0.75
R = - 0.5
R = - 0.25
R=0
R = 0.25
R = 0.5
Pure torsion R = - 1
Pure bending R = - 1
3.5
3.3
3.0
2.8
2.5
R.D.
2.3
2.0
1.8
1.5
1.3
1.0
0.8
0.5
0.3
0.0
1E+2
1E+3
1E+4
1E+5
1E+6
Relative damage (R.D.) applying Tsai-Wu failure criterion for the [60o,-30o]2s specimens.
16
3.0
R=-1
R = - 0.75
R = - 0.5
R = - 0.25
R=0
R = 0.25
R = 0.5
Pure torsion R = - 1
Pure bending R = - 1
2.8
2.5
2.3
2.0
R.D.
1.8
1.5
1.3
1.0
0.8
0.5
0.3
0.0
1E+2
1E+3
1E+4
1E+5
1E+6
Relative damage (R.D.) applying Norris & McKinnon failure criterion for the [60o,-30o]2s
specimens.
17