Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Introduction
In a FE model, a bolted joint can be modeled either by following
approaches:
1. Solid elements/Contact elements/preload model
Pros: can closely simulate a bolted joint/reduce local stress issue
Cons: time-consume-modeling and running effort/not suitable for a
complex or large model/cant be used for random analysis or any method
using modal approach
2. Shell/solid elements with wagon wheel RBE2 and CBUSH elements
Pros: less-time-consume-modeling and running effort/suitable for
random analysis or any method using modal approach
Cons: local stress results around bolt hole due to rigid body RBE2
In-plane pin load: extracted loads from CBUSH that represents the bolt
By-pass tension and bending moment loads : extracted load within W =
4dhole from FE model using Free Body/Interface function in MSC Patran
At (W d hole) T1
Ftp
At
Ftbp
At
Where
Ftp = In-plane pin load (lbs)
Ftbp = By-pass tension load (lbs)
Kt(pin) = In-plane pin load stress concentration factor
Kt(bypass) = By-pass tension load stress concentration factor
W = assumed width = 4dhole
T1 = flange thickness
MSC Software Confidential
1
3
W d hole T1
12
t ( bend)
t ( bend)
2
1
3
I
T
hole
1
W d hole T1
12
Where
Mbp = By-pass bending moment (in-lbs)
Kt(bend) = Bending stress concentration factor
MSC Software Confidential
Von-Mises stress:
2
VM
2
2
2
2
tt tt
tt tt
tt tt
tt
tt
tt
2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2
Margin of Safety:
Yield
MS y
SF VM
A Study Case
A mounting flange FE model with wagon wheel RBE2 and
CBUSH element at the bolt hole locations is created and
analyzed under a static inertial load
Several layers of concentric circles are created around each bolt
hole to represent bolted joint clamping zone under bolt head or
washer
Maximum stress results from FE analysis will be derived at the
following locations:
At bolt hole location
At one-element-away from bolt hole location
Right outside of the clamping zone
One-Element-Away
Location
Clamping Zone
(~ Bolt Head or
Washer Diameter)
Ftp
At
4.0
95.6
3,568 psi
0.1072
Ftbp
At
2.43
33.5
761 psi
0.1072
6 M bp
W d hole T12
1.77
6 7.5
3,918 psi
0.76 0.19 0.1882
Thus,
FE 21,200
2.6
tt
8,247
Study Case
dbolt (in)
dhole (in)
Sectional Cuts Dimensions dH (in)
Flange 1 Thickness T1 (in)
Emembers (psi)
Member Yield Strength (psi)
Member Ultimate Strength (psi)
Safety Factor on Yield
Safety Factor on Ultimate
In-plane Pin Load (lbs)
By-Pass Tension Load (lbs)
By-Pass Bending Moment (in-lbs)
0.190
0.190
0.760
0.188
1.00E+07
35,000
42,000
1.15
1.25
95.6
33.5
7.5
dhole/dH
T1/dhole
Pin Stress Concentration Factor Kt(pin)
By-pass Tension Stress Concentration Factor Kt(by-pass)
Out-of-plane Bending Stress Concentration Factor Kt(bend)
Moment of Inertia (in^4)
Tensile Area (in^2)
In-plane Pin Load Tension Stress (psi)
By-pass Tension Load Stress (psi)
By-pass Moment Bending Stress (psi)
Total Tensile Stress (psi)
Von-Mises Stress (psi)
0.2500
0.9895
4.00
2.43
1.77
0.0003
0.1072
3,568
761
3,918
8,247
8,247
8,247
19,500
2.4
21,200
2.6
7,970
0.97
Conclusions
At bolt hole location, stress is local and unrealistic ===> Margin
of safety will be too conservative
At one-element-away location (that is still within bolt head or
washer clamping zone), stress is more reasonable to be used for
margin of safety calculation