Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
h i g h l i g h t s
O2 consumption was used to characterized bacterial activity in bio-based mortar.
Bio-based agents used in SHCC enhanced its self-healing capacity.
Bio-based SHCC exhibits good mechanical and bonding behaviour as a repair material.
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Available online xxxx
Keywords:
Concrete repair
Bio-based mortar
Bacteria
Crack healing
Bond stress
Restrained shrinkage
a b s t r a c t
The paper describes mechanical properties, self-healing capacity and bonding behaviour of a sustainable
bio-based mortar repair system for concrete. Two different mixes of strain-hardening cement-based composites (SHCC) have been used. The bio-based agent added to the SHCC consists of both bacteria and food
for the bacteria. The metabolic activity of bacteria was monitored by oxygen prole measurements,
which reveals O2 consumption by bacteria-based samples, but not by control samples. The mechanical
properties of the mortar (exural behaviour, compression strength and drying shrinkage) are evaluated.
The bonding behaviour with the concrete substrate is evaluated based on pullout tests and restrained
shrinkage.
2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Currently available concrete repair systems face durability-related problems that have a huge impact on national economies.
In the United States of America, for instance, the annual direct
costs for maintenance and repair of concrete highway bridges
due to corrosion of the reinforcement sum up to 4 billion dollars
[1]. Most of the durability-related problems of repair systems are
due to the lack of compatibility with the concrete substrate. A combination of physical, chemical and mechanical processes results in
the failure of concrete repair [2,3]. Restrained volume changes due
to drying shrinkage or differential thermal expansion induce surface cracking in the repair system and interface delamination between repair and concrete substrate. Additionally, currently
available repair systems are largely based on environmental unfriendly materials such as epoxy systems, acrylic resins or silicone-based polymers. This paper focus on the characterization of
a concrete compatible and sustainable bio-based repair system
that features better bonding and improved durability and sustainability characteristics compared to existing repair systems.
The European Standards describe the principles and methods
for protection and repair of concrete structures [4]. The repair system studied in this paper was designed as a product for concrete
restoration by applying or spraying mortar (repair methods 3.1
and 3.3), structural strengthening by adding mortar (repair method
4.4) or replacing contaminated or carbonated concrete (repair
method 7.2) [4].
A special type of strain-hardening cement-based composite
(SHCC), called Engineered Cementitious Composite (ECC) has been
studied as repair material for concrete structures for overlay
applications and patch repair [57]. ECC was micro-mechanically
designed to have a large strain capacity with a low percentage of
randomly distributed polymer bres [8]. Because of the presence
of bres the material develops multiple micro-cracks prior to
failure. The crack width remains below 0.1 mm [9]. In concrete repair materials bres are also used to control drying shrinkage and
service load-related cracking [5]. Repair materials crack when
subjected to differential shrinkage: the early-age shrinkage
deformation of the new repair material is restrained by the old
concrete substrate that has already undergone shrinkage. Tensile
stress is developed in the repair layer and a combination of tensile
and shear stresses built up along the interface between the repair
layer and the concrete substrate [5]. When applied as a repair
0950-0618/$ - see front matter 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.012
Please cite this article in press as: Sierra-Beltran MG et al. Characterization of sustainable bio-based mortar for concrete repair. Constr Build Mater (2014),
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.012
M.G. Sierra-Beltran et al. / Construction and Building Materials xxx (2014) xxxxxx
material, ECC is capable of carrying more tensile load and accommodate larger tensile strain than other repair systems [6]. Under
differential shrinkage ECC will suppress localized brittle fracture
in favour of distributed micro-crack damage [5,6].
Autogenous healing can be understood as a natural process of
lling and sealing cracks without any external operations and
works [11]. Li and Yang [10] investigated autogenous crack healing
in ECC. They reinforced ECC with only 0.5% per volume of PVA bres in order to achieve wide cracks. They reported that ECC with
a maximum crack width of 50 lm achieved full recovery of
mechanical and transport properties due to autogenous healing.
Between 50 and 150 lm, partial recovery could be attained. Autogenous healing behaviour in SHCC heavily depends on the availability of unhydrated cement and other supplementary cementitious
materials, such as blast furnace slag or y ash. Low water/binder
material ratio and high percentage of binder material and a control
small crack width appear to promote autogenous healing in ECC
[12,13].
Conventional ECC is designed without coarse aggregates and
with only a small amount of ne sand in order to control the fracture toughness of the matrix [8]. This characteristic leads to higher
water to cement/binder ratio and eventually to a high value of
shrinkage [14]. Li [5] and Yang et al. [15] reported drying shrinkage
strain values of 1200 106 to 1800 106 for conventional ECC,
and Zhou [6] reported a drying shrinkage strain value of
2900 106 for ECC designed using limestone powder instead of
sand as ller. In similar drying conditions of 20 C and 60% relative
humidity, normal concrete has a drying shrinkage strain of
400 106 to 600 106 [16]. Conventional ECC uses micro-silica
with maximum grain size of 200 lm [10,17]. In this way the bres
in ECC are only separated by ne aggregate particles which are allowed to move freely between the bres. Particles that are bigger
than the average distance between bres will cause the bres to
concentrate in balls and lead to an irregular distribution of the bres [18]. As mentioned above, the particle size is limited in ECC
in order to limit the fracture toughness to a level in which the crack
initiation could occur before the tensile load reaches the maximum
bre-bridging stress that will result in failure of the bre bridges
[17].
To improve the durability of the concrete repair system as
well as to improve the bonding with the concrete substrate this
paper proposes a bio-based agent to be included in the ECC mix.
The bio-based agent consists of alkali-resistant bacteria and a
food source for those bacteria. When applied in concrete, this
bio-based agent has the capacity to produce calcite-based minerals inside cracks thus reducing the permeability of the concrete
[19,20]. The precipitated minerals lead to the closure of cracks
with a maximum crack width of 460 lm [20]. In case of surface
cracking in the repair mortar due to restrained shrinkage or
other mechanical processes the bio-based agent is capable of
healing these cracks to ensure the durability of the repair
product.
Repair materials are frequently subject to limited evaluations
driven by manufacturers rather than by users [21]. This is due to
a lack of widely accepted testing methods. If only the isolated
properties of repair materials are studied the more important
properties of the composite system are neglected. In this research,
the performance of the composite repair system as well as the
interaction between the repair and concrete substrate have been
investigated. Restrained shrinkage tests have been conducted on
a simulated repair system, that contains one layer of old concrete
substrate and one layer of new repair material to simulate real repair conditions.
For this study, two ECC-type mortars with particles containing a
bacterial-based agent have been studied as a sustainable bio-based
repair system for concrete. The mechanical properties of the ECC
2. Experimental investigation
2.1. Materials
Ordinary Portland cement CEM I 42.5N, y ash (FA), blast furnace slag (BFS),
limestone powder (LP), sand (S) have been used. The chemical composition of the
powder materials are given in Table 1 and the mix designs in Table 2. The sand
has an average and maximum grain size of 250 lm and 500 lm respectively. In
the mix design, BFS, FA and Portland cement are considered as binder materials,
and the limestone powder is considered as inert ller material. Polyvinyl alcohol
(PVA) bres with a length of 8 mm and diameter of 40 lm have been used in the
content at 2% by total volume. These PVA bres have a tensile strength of
1600 MPa. The surface of the bres is coated with 1.2% oil by weight to optimize
the bre-cement matrix bond [22].
The bio-based agent considered for this research is an alkaliphilic (alkali-resistant) spore-forming bacteria and calcium lactate as a nutrient source for the bacteria. Both the bacteria and the food source are embedded in lightweight aggregates.
Bacteria from genus Bacillus and more specically related to the species B. cohnii
[23], originally isolated from alkaline soil samples were chosen for this research
[24]. Previous studies show that these bacteria are capable of healing cracks by direct and indirect calcium carbonate (CaCO3) formation [19,20]. The direct CaCO3
precipitation is due to the bacterial metabolic conversion of calcium lactate according to the following reaction:
Table 1
Chemical composition (weight%) of the powders materials.
Compound
CEM I 42.5
BFS
FA
LP
CaO
SiO2
Al2O3
Fe2O3
MgO
K2O
Na2O
SO3
CaCO3
63.3
19.5
5.6
2.3
1.1
0.9
0.3
2.7
40.8
35.4
13
0.5
8.0
0.5
0.2
0.1
7.1
48.4
31.4
4.4
1.4
1.6
0.7
1.2
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.2
98.8
Please cite this article in press as: Sierra-Beltran MG et al. Characterization of sustainable bio-based mortar for concrete repair. Constr Build Mater (2014),
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.012
M.G. Sierra-Beltran et al. / Construction and Building Materials xxx (2014) xxxxxx
Table 2
Mix design of mortars by weight (in kg/m3).
Type
Mix 1 control
Mix 1B
Bio-based
Mix 2
control
Mix 2B
Bio-based
Cement
BFS
FA
LP
Sand
LWA
Water
SP
PVA
w/b*
493
592
394
414
7
26
0.38
461
553
267
101
385
16
26
0.38
440
131
558
440
379
7
26
0.34
405
121
516
308
97
364
16
26
0.35
Water-to-binder ratio.
Please cite this article in press as: Sierra-Beltran MG et al. Characterization of sustainable bio-based mortar for concrete repair. Constr Build Mater (2014),
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.012
M.G. Sierra-Beltran et al. / Construction and Building Materials xxx (2014) xxxxxx
Table 3
Mix design for layered system by weight (in kg/m3).
Repair mortars
Concrete substrate
Type
Control
Bio-based
CemI 42.5N
FA
LP
LWA
Water
SP
PVA
w/b*
483
580
387
420
21
22
0.4
449
538
260
123
390
20
22
0.4
CemIII 42.5 LH HS
Sand
Gravel
340
836
1017
Water
SP
169
0.7
w/b*
0.5
Water-to-binder ratio.
exural test. Qian and Li [28] reported that the deection capacity
is linearly correlated with tensile strain capacity for truly strainhardening materials. Hence, the deection capacity can be used
for quality control of SHCC type material due to the simplicity of
four point bending test compared to uni-axial tensile test.
Therefore the deection capacity is of major concern for the ECC
mortar repair system since its structural application will require
high deformation and energy dissipation capacity. The deection
capacity herein is dened as the deection that corresponds to
the maximal exural stress, i.e. exural strength in exural
stressdeection curve (Fig. 3).
The exural behaviour of the mortars is illustrated in Fig. 3 and
summarized in Tables 4 and 5. All mixtures show high deection
capacity which is typical for SHCC. The addition of bio-based agent
results in a slight decrease of the average exural strength measured at 56 days (Table 4) from 11.6 MPa for Mix 1 to 11.1 MPa
for Mix 1B, and from 12.7 MPa for Mix 2 to 10.4 MPa for Mix 2B.
The deection capacity, on the other hand, increased due to the
presence of particles with bio-based agent (Table 5).
Fig. 3 shows the representative exural stressdeection curve
of the reloading tests, along with a preloading test curve and a reference test to failure at 56 days for Mix 1B. Note that in this paper
for the reloading curve the permanent residual deection left from
Please cite this article in press as: Sierra-Beltran MG et al. Characterization of sustainable bio-based mortar for concrete repair. Constr Build Mater (2014),
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.012
M.G. Sierra-Beltran et al. / Construction and Building Materials xxx (2014) xxxxxx
Table 4
Average exural stress at pre-load level and exural strength after healing (standard deviations are indicated between brackets).
Pre-load level
7 days
Mix 1
Pre-loaded
After healing
28 days
9.11 [0.58]
10.6 [0.67]
Reference
Pre-loaded
Mix 1B
7.74 [0.21]
9.13 [0.60]
Reference
Pre-loaded
Mix 2
10.21 [0.40]
11.47 [0.42]
Reference
Reference 90d
Preloaded
Mix 2B
7.69 [0.52]
10.21 [0.64]
Reference
56 days
Heal/Ref.
11.63
11.68
11.59
11.85
11.28
11.12
11.73
11.12
12.74
12.61
10.44
10.19
10.39
1.00
1.01
[2.30]
[0.82]
[1.28]
[0.21]
[1.19]
[1.73]
[1.47]
[0.71]
[1.50]
[0.99]
[0.11]
[1.49]
[0.20]
1.07
1.01
0.92
0.87
1.01
0.98
Table 5
Mid-span deection at pre-load level and after healing (standard deviations are
indicated between brackets).
Mix 1
Pre-loaded
Pre-load level
After healing
7 days
56 days
Heal/Ref.
4.66
5.69
7.30
6.61
5.42
7.66
4.81
4.87
2.73
3.71
5.64
7.28
5.67
0.64
0.78
28 days
2.41 [0.07]
2.61 [0.14]
Mix 1B
Reference
Pre-loaded
2.35 [0.02]
2.69 [0.09]
Mix 2
Reference
Pre-loaded
2.43 [0.07]
2.44 [0.05]
Mix 2B
Reference
Reference 90d
Preloaded
2.28 [0.11]
2.35 [0.16]
Reference
[1.28]
[1.03]
[1.58]
[0.81]
[0.70]
[1.88]
[1.46]
[1.25]
[0.15]
[1.01]
[0.21]
[1.07]
[0.45]
0.86
0.71
1.30
1.31
0.99
1.28
Fig. 5. Measured oxygen concentration microproles towards surfaces of submerged control and bio-based samples.
Please cite this article in press as: Sierra-Beltran MG et al. Characterization of sustainable bio-based mortar for concrete repair. Constr Build Mater (2014),
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.012
M.G. Sierra-Beltran et al. / Construction and Building Materials xxx (2014) xxxxxx
Please cite this article in press as: Sierra-Beltran MG et al. Characterization of sustainable bio-based mortar for concrete repair. Constr Build Mater (2014),
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.012
M.G. Sierra-Beltran et al. / Construction and Building Materials xxx (2014) xxxxxx
Fig. 8. Photomicrographs and EDS analyses of internal healing products in M1B sample. (a) Crack 2 internal. (b) Crack 3 internal. (c) Crack 4 internal. (d) Crack 5 internal.
Please cite this article in press as: Sierra-Beltran MG et al. Characterization of sustainable bio-based mortar for concrete repair. Constr Build Mater (2014),
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.012
M.G. Sierra-Beltran et al. / Construction and Building Materials xxx (2014) xxxxxx
Fig. 9. Chemical analysis of healing products by EDS. Atomic ratio plot of S/Ca vs Si/
Ca. ETT = ettingrite.
Fig. 10. Atomic ratio plot of healing products; the limits of composition used to
characterized the phases are shown.
4. Conclusions
The main objective of this study was to clarify whether biobased self-healing via bacteria-mediated calcium carbonate production will result in improved mechanical properties and bonding
strength of a concrete-compatible bre-reinforced repair system.
Results show that a SHCC type material with bio-based agent full
the requirements for a structural repair material in terms of compressive and bonding strength. When applied as a repair material
the mortar with bio-based agent shows reduced delamination from
the concrete substrate compared to mortar without the bio-based
agent. Furthermore, after cracking and healing the mixtures with
bio-based healing agent show a slightly better recovery of both
exural strength and deection capacity from control mixtures
without bio-based healing agent. Although oxygen measurements
indicate that bacteria were metabolically active in the bio-based
specimens, observed amounts of calcium carbonate precipitate
did not appear to substantially differ from control specimens.
The reason for the apparent uncoupling between metabolic activity
and lack of enhanced calcium carbonate precipitation can possibly
be attributed to limited amounts of feed applied and this remains
to be claried in pending studies.
Acknowledgements
Please cite this article in press as: Sierra-Beltran MG et al. Characterization of sustainable bio-based mortar for concrete repair. Constr Build Mater (2014),
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.012
M.G. Sierra-Beltran et al. / Construction and Building Materials xxx (2014) xxxxxx
References
[1] FHWA-RD-01-156. Corrosion cost and preventive strategies in the United
States. Report by CC Technologies Laboratories, Inc. to Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), Ofce of Infrastructure Research and Development.
2001.
[2] Emberson NK, Mays GC. Signicance of property, mismatch in the patch repair
of structural concrete, Part 1: properties of repair systems. Mag Concr Res
1990;42(152):14760.
[3] Emmons PH. Concrete repair and maintenance illustrated. West
Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 1994. pp. 155164.
[4] NEN-EN 1504-9. Products and systems for the protection and repair of
concrete structures Part 9. 2008.
[5] Li M. Multi-scale design for durable repair of concrete structures. PhD thesis.
USA: University of Michigan at Ann Arbor; 2009.
[6] Zhou J. Performance of engineered cementitious composites for concrete
repairs. PhD thesis. Netherlands: Delft University of Technology; 2011.
[7] Sierra-Beltran MG, Jonkers HM. Bio-based mortar for concrete repair. In: Forde
MC, editors. Proceedings of 14th int. conf. structural faults and repair, 2012.
[8] Li VC. From micromechanics to structural engineering the design of
cementitious composites for civil engineering applications. J Struct Mech
Earthquake Eng 1993;10(2):3748.
[9] Li VC. Advances in ECC research. ACI Special publication on concrete: Material
Science to Applications. SP206-23; 2002. p. 373400.
[10] Li VC, Yang EH. Self healing in concrete materials. In: Self healing materials: an
alternative approach to 20 centuries of materials sciences; 2007. p. 16193.
[11] de Rooij M, Van Tittelboom K, De Belie N, Schlangen E, editors. Self-healing
phenomena in cement-based materials. Springer; 2013. p. 117.
[12] Qian S, Zhou J, de Rooij MR, Schlangen E, Ye G, van Breugel K. Self-healing
behavior of strain hardening cementitious composites incorporating local
waste materials. Cem Concr Compos 2009;31(9):61321.
[13] Yang Y, Yang EH, Li VC. Autogenous healing of engineered cementitious
composites at early age. Cem Concr Res 2011;41(2):17683.
[14] Buffenbarger J, Hondo F, Nmai C, Tomita R. Shrinkage-reducing admixtures for
concrete. ACI Concr Int 1998;20(4):317.
[15] Yang EH, Yang Y, Li VC. Use of high volumes of y ash to improve ECC
mechanical
properties
and
material
greenness.
ACI
Mater
J
2007;104(6):30311.
[16] Neville AM. Properties of concrete. 4th ed. Harlow: Longman; 1995.
Please cite this article in press as: Sierra-Beltran MG et al. Characterization of sustainable bio-based mortar for concrete repair. Constr Build Mater (2014),
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.012