Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Capital budgeting is the process of planning the acquisition or sale of plant assets.
2.
Capital budgeting decisions are risky because: (1) the outcomes are uncertain, (2)
large amounts of money are usually involved, (3) the investment involves a longterm commitment, and (4) the decisions may be difficult or impossible to reverse.
3.
Capital budgeting decisions require careful analysis because they are generally the
most difficult and risky decisions that management faces.
4.
The payback period ignores both the present value of cash flows and all cash flows
after the payback period.
5.
6.
If net income is earned evenly throughout each year and straight-line depreciation is
used, the average investment is the original cost plus the salvage value, divided by
2. For this machine, the average investment equals $110,000, computed as
($200,000 + $20,000)/ 2.
7.
When the present value of expected net cash flows, discounted at 10%, exceeds the
amount invested it indicates that the expected rate of return on the investment is
greater than 10 percent. On the other hand, when the present value of expected net
cash flows, discounted at 10%, is less than the amount invested it indicates that the
expected rate of return on the investment is less than 10 percent.
8.
Receiving $100 one year from today is worth less than $100 today because a return
can be earned on a $100 investment during the year. If $100 to be received one year
from today is discounted at 12%, the present value is $100 x 0.8929 = $89.29 (the
present value factor is taken from Table B.1). This means that if $89.29 is invested at
12% for one year, it will be worth $100 at the end of that year. This amount also can
be found by dividing $100 by 1.12.
95
9.
The return on an investment must cover the interest and provide an additional profit
to reward the company for risk. For example, if money can be borrowed at 10%, a
required after-tax return of about 15% is usually acceptable for companies with
average risk projects.
10. Accelerated depreciation produces larger tax deductions and lower tax payments in
the early years of an assets life compared with straight-line depreciation. This is
because the larger depreciation expense for accelerated methods in earlier years
reduces both taxable income and taxes paid in the short run (in the long run there is
no difference except for the time value of money). Therefore, net cash inflows will
be larger in earlier years, which will increase the present value of future cash flows.
11. An out-of-pocket cost requires a current outlay of cash. An opportunity cost is the
potential benefit that is lost by choosing an alternative course of action.
Opportunity costs are not recorded in the accounting records.
12. Sunk costs are irrelevant because they remain the same whether the product is sold
in its present condition or processed further.
13. There are virtually no incremental costs associated with shipping the additional
dozen donuts. The companys employees would not receive any additional
compensation for handling one additional dozen, no ground transportation costs
would be incurred for picking it up at the senders location, additional fuel costs for
transportation would be minuscule, and no additional transportation costs would be
incurred at the destination.
14. Tastykake management could use one of the following common methods to evaluate
the potential oven investment: payback period, accounting rate of return, net
present value, or internal rate of return.
15. The company might be willing to sell the units internationally if (a) the company has
excess capacity, (b) the incremental costs of manufacturing and selling the units are
less than $15 each, which it appears to be at $13 variable cost per unit (c) the
international sales wont reduce domestic sales, and (d) the international buyer is
unwilling to pay more than $15.
QUICK STUDIES
Quick Study 25-1 (10 minutes)
1. If all else is equal, Investment A would be preferred over Investment B
because of As shorter payback period.
2. However, if the investments are different, then there are at least four
reasons why Investment B might be preferred over Investment A:
i. The present value of cash flows from Investment B might greatly exceed
the present value of cash flows from Investment A.
ii. Investment B might be expected to have total cash flows significantly in
excess of the total cash flows returned by Investment A.
iii. Risk of Investment B might be much less than the risk of Investment A.
iv. The growth potential of Investment B might be much greater than that
for Investment A.
97
Y
$ 8.00
1/3
$24.00
Sales Mix Analysis: Since Memory Lane can sell all it can produce of both
products, it should allocate all of its production capacity to Product Y. This is
because Y yields a $24 contribution margin per production hour (versus $20 for X).
Year
Cash flows
Present value
of 1 at 10%
Present value of
cash flows
Cumulative
present value of
cash flows
$(100,000)
1.0000
$(100,000)
$(100,000)
35,000
0.9091
31,819
(68,181)
35,000
0.8264
28,924
( 39,257)
35,000
0.7513
26,296
( 12,961)
35.000
0.6830
23,905
10,944
35,000
0.6209
21,732
32,676
The break-even time point occurs in the 7th month of the 4th year [computed
as ($12,961 / $23,905) x 12 = 6.5 months]. Therefore, a reasonable estimate
would be approximately 3.5 years (or 3 7/12 years) for break-even time.
McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005
98
EXERCISES
Exercise 25-1 (20 minutes)
a.
Payback period =
Cost of investment
Annual net cash flow
$260,000
= $125,000 = 2.08 years
where
Annual after-tax income.............................................
$ 75,000
Plus depreciation*.......................................................
50,000
Annual net cash flow..................................................
$125,000
*Annual depreciation =
$260,000 - $10,000
5
= $50,000
b.
Payback period =
Cost of investment
$190,000
Annual net cash flow = $50,000
= 3.8 years
where
Annual after-tax income.............................................
$ 30,000
Plus depreciation*.......................................................
20,000
Annual net cash flow..................................................
$ 50,000
*Annual depreciation =
$190,000 - $10,000
9
= $20,000
Cumulative
Cash Flows
$ 30,000
50,000
80,000
140,000
159,000
99
$10,000
= $60,000
= 0.167
Ending
Book Value
$180,000
108,000
64,800
50,000
50,000
Net
Income
$ 20,000
50,000
100,000
75,000
200,000
Net Cash
Flow
$ 140,000
122,000
143,200
89,800
200,000
Depreciation
$120,000
72,000
43,200
14,800
0
Cost of machine.....................................
Paid back in years 1 and 2....................
Paid back in year 3................................
Cumulative
Cash Flow
$ 140,000
262,000
405,200
495,000
695,000
$300,000
262,000
$ 38,000
$38,000
$143,200
= 0.265
Cash flows
$150,000
80,000
Depreciation................................................. 20,000
Selling and administrative.......................... 15,000
15,000
10,500
1. Payback period =
$240,000
$44,500
$ 44,500
= 5.39 years
$24,500
$120,000*
= 20.42%
*Average investment
Cost................................... $240,000
Salvage.............................
0
Sum................................... $240,000
Average (Sum/2)............... $120,000
101
Present
Value of
Annuity
at 8%
7.5361
Present
Value of
Net Cash
Flows
$ 335,356
Amount to be invested.........................................
(240,000)
$ 95,356)
Present
Value of 1
at 12%
Year 1.................................................
$ 10,000
0.8929
Year 2.................................................
90,000
0.7972
Year 3.................................................
140,000
0.7118
Totals.................................................
$240,000
Amount invested...................................................
Net present value..................................................
Present
Value of
Net Cash
Flows
8,929
71,748
99,652
$180,329
(190,000)
$ (9,671)
PROJECT C2
Net Cash
Flows
Present
Value of 1
at 12%
Year 1.................................................
$ 80,000
0.8929
Year 2.................................................
80,000
0.7972
Year 3.................................................
80,000
0.7118
Totals.................................................
$240,000
Amount invested...................................................
Net present value..................................................
Present
Value of
Net Cash
Flows
$ 71,432
63,776
56,944
$192,152
(190,000)
$ 2,152
Present
Value of 1
at 12%
Year 1.................................................
$150,000
0.8929
Year 2.................................................
50,000
0.7972
Year 3.................................................
40,000
0.7118
Totals.................................................
$240,000
Amount invested...................................................
Net present value..................................................
Present
Value of
Net Cash
Flows
$133,935
39,860
28,472
$202,267
(190,000)
$ 12,267
Project C2 will have an internal rate of return higher than 12%. We know
this because Project C2 has a positive net present value using a 12% rate of
return.
3.
103
Additional
Volume*
$240,000
Combined
Total
$3,240,000
400,000
40,0001
440,000
Direct labor......................................
800,000
80,0002
880,000
Overhead.........................................
200,000
30,000
230,000
Selling expenses............................
300,000
Administrative expenses...............
514,000
86,000
600,000
$236,000
$2,450,000
$ 790,000
300,000
4,000
2
(20,000 x $2)
(20,000 x $4)
*ADDITIONAL VOLUME COMPUTATIONS
Additional sales revenue = 20,000 units @ $12 = $240,000
Materials cost per unit = $400,000/200,000 units = $2 per unit
Labor cost per unit = $800,000/200,000 units = $4 per unit
Incremental overhead = $200,000 x 15% = $30,000
Incremental administrative = $86,000 (given)
RECOMMENDATION: Note that the allocated fixed costs of $45,000 are not
relevant to this managerial decision because they will continue whether the
part is made or bought. Therefore, the incremental costs of making the part
are $10,000 less per year than buying it. This implies that the company
should continue to make this part.
Note: We should recognize that this decision depends on the alternative uses for the
productive facilities dedicated to making the part. If they can be used to produce a profit
greater than the $10,000 annual savings that the company attains by making this part,
the part should probably be purchased and the facilities used for the other more
profitable activities.
105
Units
Product B.....................................................................
4,000
Product C.....................................................................
8,000
Total revenue from processed products..................
Price
$75
50
Total
$300,000
400,000
$700,000
$ 700,000
(800,000)
$(100,000)
RECOMMENDATION: This analysis shows that the company will be worse off
by $100,000 if it chooses to process Product A into the two products of B
and C. (Note that the $20 per unit cost of manufacturing Product A is sunk
and irrelevant to this decision.)
1. NO DEPARTMENTS ELIMINATED
Total
M
Sales..................................
$112,000 $31,500
Expenses
Avoidable........................
60,200
4,900
Unavoidable...................
53,900
25,900
Total expenses...............
114,100
30,800
Net income (loss).............
$ (2,100) $ 700
N
$17,500
O
$28,000
P
$21,000
T
$14,000
18,200
6,300
24,500
$ (7,000)
11,200
2,100
13,300
$14,700
7,000
14,700
21,700
$ (700)
18,900
4,900
23,800
$ (9,800)
N
$
0
6,300
$ 6,300
$(6,300)
O
$28,000
P
$
T
0
11,200
0
2,100
14,700
13,300 $ 14,700
$14,700 $(14,700)
0
4,900
4,900
$(4,900)
N
$
O
$28,000
0
11,200
6,300
2,100
6,300
13,300
$(6,300) $14,700
P
$21,000
T
$
7,000
14,700
21,700
$ (700)
0
4,900
4,900
$(4,900)
107
Product MTV
$ 7.50
4.50
$ 3.00
1.
0.20
$15.00
3,750 units
0.50
1,875 hours
325 hours
0.20
1,625 units
Contribution
per Unit
$8.75
3.00
Total
$32,813*
4,875
$37,688
*Rounded
Break-Even Time
109
PROBLEM SET A
Problem 25-1A (50 minutes)
Part 1
Annual straight-line depreciation =
$300,000 - $20,000
4 years
= $70,000
Part 2
Net
Income
Net Cash
Flow
$1,150,000
(300,000)
(300,000)
Direct labor..............................................................
(420,000)
(420,000)
(210,000)
(210,000)
(70,000)
(100,000)
50,000
(15,000)
Net income................................................................. $
Net cash flow*............................................................
(100,000)
(15,000)
35,000
$ 105,000
Part 3
Payback Period =
$300,000
$105,000
= 2.86 years
$35,000
$160,000*
= 21.88%
* Average investment
Asset cost................................................
$300,000
Final years book value...........................
20,000
Sum...........................................................
$320,000
Average (Sum /2).....................................
$160,000
Part 5
Present Value of Net Cash Flows
Net Cash
Flows
Year 1.............................
$105,000
Year 2.............................
105,000
Year 3.............................
105,000
Year 4*............................
125,000
Totals.............................
$440,000
Present
Value of
1 at 7%
0.9346
0.8734
0.8163
0.7629
Present
Value of Net
Cash Flows
$ 98,133
91,707
85,712
95,363
370,915
Amount invested...............................
(300,000)
$ 70,915
111
$112,000
Depreciation expense*.....................
175,000
$287,000
*Annual depreciation =
$700,000 - $0
4 years
= $175,000
PROJECT Z
Net income........................................
$ 72,800
Depreciation expense*.....................
233,333
$306,133
*Annual depreciation =
$700,000 - $0
3 years
= $233,333
Part 2
PROJECT Y
Payback Period =
$700,000
$287,000
= 2.44 years
$700,000
$306,133
= 2.29 years
PROJECT Z
Payback Period =
$112,000
$350,000*
= 32%
*Average investment
Asset cost.................................................
$700,000
Average (Cost/2).......................................
$350,000
PROJECT Z
Accounting rate of return =
$72,800
$350,000*
= 20.8%
*Average investment
Asset cost.................................................
$700,000
Average (Cost/2).......................................
$350,000
113
Net Cash
Flows
Years 1-4........................
$287,000
Present
Value of
1 at 8%
Annuity
Present
Value of
Net Cash
Flows
3.3121
$950,573
Amount invested...................................................
(700,000)
$250,573
PROJECT Z
Present Value of Net Cash Flows
Net Cash
Flows
Years 1-3........................
$306,133
Present
Value of
1 at 8% Annuity
Present
Value of
Net Cash
Flows
2.5771
$788,935
Amount invested...................................................
(700,000)
$ 88,935
Part 5
Recommendation to management is to pursue Project Y. This is because
Project Y has a positive net present value, which means that we expect it to
earn at least 8% on our cash investment in the machine. Project Z also has
a positive net present value, but its present value is less than that of Project
Y. We also note that the accounting rate of return is higher for Project Y
compared with Project Z.
(b)
StraightLine
Deprec.
$ 3,000
(c)
Taxable
Income
(a) - (b)
$9,000
(d)
40%
Income
Taxes
$3,600
(e)
Net Cash
Flows
(a) - (d)
$8,400
Year 2.............................
12,000
6,000
6,000
2,400
9,600
Year 3.............................
12,000
6,000
6,000
2,400
9,600
Year 4.............................
12,000
6,000
6,000
2,400
9,600
Year 5.............................
12,000
6,000
6,000
2,400
9,600
Year 6.............................
12,000
3,000
9,000
3,600
8,400
(d)
40%
Income
Taxes
$2,400
(e)
Net Cash
Flows
(a) - (d)
$9,600
Part 2
RESULTS USING MACRS DEPRECIATION
(a)
Income
Before
Deprec.
Year 1.............................
$12,000
(b)
MACRS
Deprec.
$6,000
(c)
Taxable
Income
(a) - (b)
$6,000
Year 2.............................
12,000
9,600
2,400
960
11,040
Year 3.............................
12,000
5,760
6,240
2,496
9,504
Year 4.............................
12,000
3,456
8,544
3,418
8,582
Year 5.............................
12,000
3,456
8,544
3,418
8,582
Year 6.............................
12,000
1,728
10,272
4,109
7,891
115
Present
Net Cash
Value of Net
Flows
Cash Flows
Year 1.............................
$ 8,400
$ 7,636
Year 2.............................
9,600
7,933
Year 3.............................
9,600
7,212
Year 4.............................
9,600
6,557
Year 5.............................
9,600
5,961
Year 6.............................
8,400
4,742
Totals.............................
$55,200
40,041
Amount invested.......................................................................
(30,000)
Net present value......................................................................
$10,041
Part 4
NET PRESENT VALUE OF ASSET USING MACRS DEPRECIATION
Present
Net Cash
Value of
Flows
1 at 10%
Year 1.............................
$ 9,600
0.9091
Year 2.............................
11,040
0.8264
Year 3.............................
9,504
0.7513
Year 4.............................
8,582
0.6830
Year 5.............................
8,582
0.6209
Year 6.............................
7,891
0.5645
Totals.............................
$55,199
Amount invested...............................
Net present value..............................
Present
Value of Net
Cash Flows
$ 8,727
9,123
7,140
5,862
5,329
4,454
40,635
(30,000)
$10,635
Part 5
Analysis: The net present value using MACRS depreciation is greater than the
net present value using straight-line depreciation because the cash flows are
larger in the earlier years of the assets life under MACRS depreciation. They
are larger because the depreciation deductions are larger, resulting in less
income taxes paid in the earlier years.
(2)
(3)
Normal
Volume
New
Business
Combined
Sales..................................................
$1,200,000
$172,000
$1,372,000
64,000
448,000
24,000
120,000
Overhead......................................... 288,000
36,000
324,000
120,000
4,000
84,000
128,000
1,096,000
Operating income.............................
$ 232,000
$ 44,000
$ 276,000
Supporting computations
Normal direct materials cost.........................................
$384,000
Units of output................................................................
300,000
Cost per unit...................................................................
$
1.28
New business volume....................................................50,000
New business direct materials cost.............................
$ 64,000
Normal direct labor cost................................................
$ 96,000
Units of output................................................................
300,000
Cost per unit...................................................................
$
0.32
Overtime per unit (50%)................................................. 0.16
New business direct labor cost per unit......................
$
0.48
New business volume....................................................50,000
New business direct labor cost....................................
$ 24,000
Total overhead................................................................
$288,000
Fixed overhead (25%)..................................................... 72,000
Variable overhead...........................................................
$216,000
Units of output................................................................
300,000
Cost per unit...................................................................
$
0.72
New business volume....................................................50,000
New business variable overhead cost.........................
$ 36,000
117
Product B
$160
90
$ 70
2.0
$ 35
Part 2
Sales Mix Recommendation. To the extent allowed by production and
market constraints, the company should produce as much of Product G as
possible. With a single shift yielding 176 hours per month (8 x 22), the
company can produce these units of Product G:
Maximum output of G =
Contr./unit
$80
70
Total
$32,000
1,120
(6,500)
$26,620
119
Contr./unit
$80
70
Total
$35,200
0
(6,500)
(2,000)
$26,700
Eliminated
Expenses
Continuing
Expenses
$414,000
$524,000
Direct expenses
Advertising..........................................................
58,000
24,000
34,000
7,600
8,000
DepreciationStore equipment........................
16,600
Allocated expenses
Sales salaries*....................................................
208,000
16,600
104,000
Rent expense......................................................
28,320
Bad debts expense.............................................
36,000
104,000
28,320
16,200
Office salary*.......................................................
62,400
19,800
62,400
Insurance expense*............................................
6,200
1,540
4,660
800
7,200
Total expenses......................................................
$1,377,120
$568,140
$808,980
*Computation notes. Closing Department 200 will eliminate 70% of its insurance
expense and 25% of its miscellaneous office expense. Sales salaries will be
reduced by the amounts paid to the two clerks who will not be replaced. The
office salary will not be eliminated, but it will be reclassified so that one-half will
be reported as sales salary and one-half as office salary.
121
Office
Salary
$62,400
(31,200)
$31,200
(580,000)
568,140
$ 63,020
ANALYSIS
Department 200's avoidable expenses of $568,140 are $11,860 less than its
revenues of $580,000. This means the company's annual net income would
be $11,860 less from eliminating Department 200. This analysis suggests
the department should probably not be eliminated.
123
PROBLEM SET B
Problem 25-1B (50 minutes)
Part 1
Annual straight-line depreciation =
$100,000 - $25,000
= $15,000
5 years
Part 2
Net
Income
Expected annual sales of new product........................
$ 350,000
Net Cash
Flow
$ 350,000
150,000
50,000
100,000
23,000
2,400
Net income......................................................................$
9,600
2,400
$ 24,600
$100,000
$24,600
= 4.07 years
Part 4
Accounting rate of return =
$9,600
$62,500*
= 15.36%
*Average investment
Asset cost..................................................
$100,000
Final years book value.............................
25,000
Sum............................................................
$125,000
Average (Sum /2).......................................
$ 62,500
Part 5
Present Value of Net Cash Flows
Net Cash
Flows
Year 1.............................
$ 24,600
Year 2.............................
24,600
Year 3.............................
24,600
Year 4.
24,600
Year 5*............................
49,600
Present
Value of
1 at 12%
0.8929
0.7972
0.7118
0.6355
0.5674
Present
Value of Net
Cash Flows
$ 21,965
19,611
17,510
15,633
28,143
Totals.............................
$148,000
$102,862
Amount invested...............................
(100,000)
2,862
125
*Annual depreciation =
= $160,000
PROJECT B
Net income............................................ $ 51,800
Depreciation expense*........................
120,000
*Annual depreciation =
= $120,000
Part 2
PROJECT A
Payback Period =
$480,000
$191,500
= 2.5 years
$480,000
$171,800
= 2.8 years
PROJECT B
Payback Period =
$31,500
$240,000*
= 13.1%
*Average investment
Asset cost..................................................
$480,000
Average (Cost/2)........................................
$240,000
PROJECT B
Accounting rate of return =
$51,800
$240,000*
= 21.6%
*Average investment
Asset cost..................................................
$480,000
Average (Cost/2)........................................
$240,000
127
Net Cash
Flows
Years 1-3........................
$191,500
Present
Value of
1 at 10%
Annuity
Present
Value of
Net Cash
Flows
2.4869
$ 476,241
Amount invested...................................................
(480,000)
Net Cash
Flows
Present
Value of
1 at 10%
Annuity
Present
Value of
Net Cash
Flows
Years 1-4........................
$171,800
3.1699
$544,589
Amount invested...................................................
(480,000)
(b)
StraightLine
Deprec.
$2,500
(c)
Taxable
Income
(a) - (b)
$12,500
(d)
30%
Income
Taxes
$3,750
(e)
Net Cash
Flows
(a) - (d)
$11,250
Year 2.............................
15,000
5,000
10,000
3,000
12,000
Year 3.............................
15,000
5,000
10,000
3,000
12,000
Year 4.............................
15,000
5,000
10,000
3,000
12,000
Year 5.............................
15,000
5,000
10,000
3,000
12,000
Year 6.............................
15,000
2,500
12,500
3,750
11,250
(d)
30%
Income
Taxes
$3,000
(e)
Net Cash
Flows
(a) - (d)
$12,000
Part 2
RESULTS USING MACRS DEPRECIATION
(a)
Income
Before
Deprec.
Year 1.............................
$15,000
(b)
MACRS
Deprec.
$5,000
(c)
Taxable
Income
(a) - (b)
$10,000
Year 2.............................
15,000
8,000
7,000
2,100
12,900
Year 3.............................
15,000
4,800
10,200
3,060
11,940
Year 4.............................
15,000
2,880
12,120
3,636
11,364
Year 5.............................
15,000
2,880
12,120
3,636
11,364
Year 6.............................
15,000
1,440
13,560
4,068
10,932
129
Present
Value of
1 at 15%
Present
Value of Net
Cash Flows
Year 1.............................
$11,250
0.8696
$ 9,783
Year 2.............................
12,000
0.7561
9,073
Year 3.............................
12,000
0.6575
7,890
Year 4.............................
12,000
0.5718
6,862
Year 5.............................
12,000
0.4972
5,966
Year 6.............................
11,250
0.4323
4,863
Totals.............................
$70,500
$44,437
Amount invested.......................................................................
(25,000)
Net present value......................................................................
$19,437
Part 4
NET PRESENT VALUE OF ASSET USING MACRS DEPRECIATION
Present
Value of
1 at 15%
Present
Value of Net
Cash Flows
Year 1.............................
$12,000
0.8696
Year 2.............................
12,900
0.7561
Year 3.............................
11,940
0.6575
Year 4.............................
11,364
0.5718
Year 5.............................
11,364
0.4972
Year 6.............................
10,932
0.4323
Totals.............................
$70,500
Amount invested...............................
$10,435
9,754
7,851
6,498
5,650
4,726
$44,914
(25,000)
$19,914
Net Cash
Flows
Part 5
Analysis: The net present value using MACRS depreciation is greater than the
net present value using straight-line depreciation because the cash flows are
larger in the earlier years of the assets life under MACRS depreciation. They
are larger because the depreciation deductions are larger, resulting in less
income taxes paid in the earlier years.
(2)
(3)
Normal
Volume
New
Business
Combined
Sales..................................................$200,000
$16,000
$216,000
3,000
33,000
2,400
14,400
Overhead......................................... 50,000
1,000
51,000
Selling expenses............................
7,500
7,500
750
32,250
7,150
138,150
$ 8,850
$ 77,850
Supporting computations
Normal direct material cost...........................................
$ 30,000
Units of output................................................................
200,000
Cost per unit...................................................................
$ 0.15
New business volume....................................................
20,000
New business direct material cost...............................
$ 3,000
Normal direct labor cost................................................
$ 12,000
Units of output................................................................
200,000
Cost per unit...................................................................
$ 0.06
Overtime per unit (100%)............................................... 0.06
New business direct labor cost per unit......................
$ 0.12
New business volume....................................................
20,000
New business direct labor cost....................................
$ 2,400
Total overhead................................................................
$ 50,000
Fixed overhead (80%).....................................................
40,000
Variable overhead...........................................................
$ 10,000
Units of output................................................................
200,000
Cost per unit...................................................................
$ 0.05
New business volume....................................................
20,000
New business variable overhead cost.........................
$ 1,000
131
Product 44
$ 200
150
$ 50
0.5
$ 100
Part 2
Sales Mix Recommendation To the extent allowed by production and
market constraints, the company should produce as much of Product 44 as
possible. With a single shift yielding 184 hours per month (8 x 23), the
company can produce these units of Product 44:
Maximum output of 44 =
Contr./unit
$50
75
Total
$22,500
13,350
(5,000)
$30,850
133
Contr./unit
$50
75
Total
$25,000
11,025
(5,000)
(500)
$30,525
Eliminated
Expenses
Continuing
Expenses
$62,550
$230,650
1,500
700
13,500
2,800
10,500
Sales salaries*....................................................
46,800
Rent expense......................................................
13,800
Bad debts expense.............................................
12,500
Office salary*.......................................................
13,000
Insurance expense*............................................
2,800
Miscellaneous office expenses*........................
2,100
23,400
455
375
23,400
13,800
10,500
13,000
2,345
1,725
Total expenses......................................................
$413,200
$90,980
$322,220
Direct expenses
Advertising..........................................................
15,000
Store supplies used...........................................
3,500
Depreciation of store equip...............................
10,500
Allocated expenses
2,000
135
90,980
ANALYSIS
Department Z's avoidable expenses of $90,980 are $3,480 greater than its
revenues of $87,500. This means the company's annual net income would
be $3,480 higher from eliminating Department Z. This analysis suggests
management should probably go ahead with the elimination of the
department as planned.
137
SERIAL PROBLEM
Serial Problem, Success Systems (50 minutes)
COMPUTING NET CASH FLOWS FROM NET INCOME
Net income
Sales.............................................................$150,000
Cash flows
$150,000
(80,000)
Depreciation................................................. (20,000)
Selling and administrative.......................... (15,000)
(15,000)
(10,500)
1. Payback period =
$120,000
$44,500
$ 44,500
= 2.7 years
$24,500
$60,000*
= 40.8%
*Average investment
Cost................................... $120,000
Salvage..............................
0
Sum................................... $120,000
Average (Sum/2)............... $ 60,000
Reporting in Action
BTN 25-1
4. Krispy Kreme gains low cost exposure (Krispy Kreme may have been
139
Comparative Analysis
BTN 25-2
1. Answer depends on the newspaper selected and its price for advertising
space. The cost of a one-quarter page advertisement in a medium-sized
U.S. city newspaper is probably near $2,000.
2. If we assume that the average product of Krispy Kreme and Tastykake
sells for around $5, then the contribution margin per product is about $1
(using the 20% stated assumption in the problem). This would mean that
the company would need to sell at least 2,000 additional products
(computed by dividing the $2,000 advertisement by the $1 contribution
margin per product) to recover the price of the advertisement.
Incremental sales of more than 2,000 products from this advertisement
would support the profitability of this marketing strategy.
3.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Ethics Challenge
BTN 25-3
Communicating in Practice
BTN 25-4
Instructor note: Answers will vary, but responses should address the questions asked and
include some discussion of the following points for each method.
Payback
Period
Cash flows
Accounting
Rate of Return
Accrual
income
Net Present
Value
Cash flows
Internal Rate of
Return
Cash flows
Profitability
Profitability
Measurement
basis
Measurement
unit
Periods
Percent
Dollars
Percent
Strengths
Easy to
understand
Easy to
understand
Allows
comparison
of projects
Allows
comparison
of projects
Reflects time
value of
money
Reflects
different risk
levels over
projects life
Reflects time
value of
money
Allows
comparisons
of dissimilar
projects
Ignores
time value
of money
Ignores
time value
of money
Ignores
cash flows
after
payback
period
Ignores
annual
rates over
life of
project
Difficult to
compare
dissimilar
projects
Limitations
Ignores
varying risk
levels over
life of
project
141
BTN 25-5
Teamwork in Action
BTN 25-6
Instructor note: Answers will vary across students. Yet the examples, while different, should
capture similar qualitative factors.
SAMPLE SOLUTION
Project
Investment in an improved baggage handling system. The new, improved
baggage handling system is expected to increase both customer
satisfaction and likelihood of repeat business.
Qualitative Factors
Competition has a new, more efficient and effective system.
Need to replace old system.
Increased customer demand for a new system because of special
baggage handling needs, for example, golf clubs to vacation destination.
Eases the workload of baggage handlers.
Improves employee morale.
Safety concerns with the older system--both employees and customers.
BTN 25-7
Entrepreneurial Decision
BTN 25-8
Since AnthroTronix can sell all it can produce of both products, it should
allocate all of its production capacity to the home model of the CosmoBot.
This is because the home model yields a $1,600 contribution margin per
production hour (versus $1,000 for the enhanced model).
Enhanced
Model
Contribution margin per unit............................... $ 500
Production hours per unit...................................
Home
Model
$ 400
1/2
1/4
$1,600
143
BTN 25-9
Purchase terms$16,500
Global Decision
BTN 25-10
145