NURS 2010 Project

value: 0.00

value: 1.00

value: 2.00

value: 3.00

value: 4.00

Articulation
of Response
(clarity,
organization,
mechanics)

The candidate provides

unsatisfactory articulation
of response.

The candidate provides

weak articulation of
response.

The candidate provides

limited articulation of
response.

The candidate provides

adequate articulation of
response.

The candidate provides

substantial articulation of
response.

A. Functional
Differences

The candidate does not

provide a logical
explanation of the
functional differences
between a regulatory
agency, such as a BRN,
and a PNO as it pertains to
the candidates
professional nursing
practice.

The candidate provides a

logical explanation, with no
detail, of the functional
differences between a
regulatory agency, such as
a BRN, and a PNO as it
pertains to the candidates
professional nursing
practice.

The candidate provides a

logical explanation, with
limited detail, of the
functional differences
between a regulatory
agency, such as a BRN,
and a PNO as it pertains to
the candidates
professional nursing
practice.

The candidate provides a

logical explanation, with
adequate detail, of the
functional differences
between a regulatory
agency, such as a BRN,
and a PNO as it pertains to
the candidates
professional nursing
practice.

The candidate provides a

logical explanation, with
substantial detail, of the
functional differences
between a regulatory
agency, such as a BRN,
and a PNO as it pertains to
the candidates
professional nursing
practice.

B. Nursing
Code
Examples

The candidate does not

provide a logical discussion
of 2 examples of how
provisions from a nursing
code of ethics influence the
candidates practice.

The candidate provides a

logical discussion, with no
support, of 2 examples of
how provisions from a
nursing code of ethics
influence the candidates
practice.

The candidate provides a

logical discussion, with
limited support, of 2
examples of how
provisions from a nursing
code of ethics influence the
candidates practice.

The candidate provides a

logical discussion, with
adequate support, of 2
examples of how
provisions from a nursing
code of ethics influence the
candidates practice.

The candidate provides a

logical discussion, with
substantial support, of 2
examples of how
provisions from a nursing
code of ethics influence the
candidates practice.

C.
Professional
Traits

The candidate does not

provide a logical discussion
of 4 professional traits from
the ANA Code of Ethics
that the candidate will bring
to an interdisciplinary team
of healthcare professionals.

The candidate provides a

logical discussion, with no
detail, of 4 professional
traits from the ANA Code of
Ethics that the candidate
will bring to an
interdisciplinary team of
healthcare professionals.

The candidate provides a

logical discussion, with
limited detail, of 4
professional traits from the
ANA Code of Ethics that
the candidate will bring to
an interdisciplinary team of
healthcare professionals.

The candidate provides a

logical discussion, with
adequate detail, of 4
professional traits from the
ANA Code of Ethics that
the candidate will bring to
an interdisciplinary team of
healthcare professionals.

The candidate provides a

logical discussion, with
substantial detail, of 4
professional traits from the
ANA Code of Ethics that
the candidate will bring to
an interdisciplinary team of
healthcare professionals.

D. Nursing
Theory

The candidate does not

identify a nursing theory
that has influenced the
candidates personal
professional practice.

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

The candidate identifies a

nursing theory that has
influenced the candidates
personal professional
practice.

D1. Theory
in
Professional
Practice

The candidate does not

provide a logical
explanation of how the
chosen theory fits the
candidates professional
practice.

The candidate provides a

logical explanation, with no
support, of how the chosen
theory fits the candidates
professional practice.

The candidate provides a

logical explanation, with
limited support, of how the
chosen theory fits the
candidates professional
practice.

The candidate provides a

logical explanation, with
adequate support, of how
the chosen theory fits the
candidates professional
practice.

The candidate provides a

logical explanation, with
substantial support, of how
the chosen theory fits the
candidates professional
practice.

Score/Level

value: 0.00

value: 1.00

value: 2.00

value: 3.00

value: 4.00

E.
Contributions

The candidate does not

provide a logical discussion
of how the contributions of
1 historical nursing figure
have impacted the
candidates professional
nursing practice, including
modern-day application.

The candidate provides a

logical discussion, with no
support, of how the
contributions of 1 historical
nursing figure have
impacted the candidates
professional nursing
practice, including modernday application.

The candidate provides a

logical discussion, with
limited support, of how the
contributions of 1 historical
nursing figure have
impacted the candidates
professional nursing
practice, including modernday application.

The candidate provides a

logical discussion, with
adequate support, of how
the contributions of 1
historical nursing figure
have impacted the
candidates professional
nursing practice, including
modern-day application.

The candidate provides a

logical discussion, with
substantial support, of how
the contributions of 1
historical nursing figure
have impacted the
candidates professional
nursing practice, including
modern-day application.

F. Scenario

The candidate does not

provide a logical discussion
of a scenario in which the
candidate safeguarded 2 of
the given principles for the
patient.

The candidate provides a

logical discussion, with no
detail, of a scenario in
which the candidate
safeguarded 2 of the given
principles for the patient.

The candidate provides a

logical discussion, with
limited detail, of a scenario
in which the candidate
safeguarded 2 of the given
principles for the patient.

The candidate provides a

logical discussion, with
adequate detail, of a
scenario in which the
candidate safeguarded 2 of
the given principles for the
patient.

The candidate provides a

logical discussion, with
substantial detail, of a
scenario in which the
candidate safeguarded 2 of
the given principles for the
patient.

G. Sources

When the candidate uses

sources, the candidate
does not provide in-text
citations and references.

When the candidate uses

sources, the candidate
provides only some in-text
citations and references.

When the candidate uses

sources, the candidate
provides appropriate in-text
citations and references
with major deviations from
APA style.

When the candidate uses

sources, the candidate
provides appropriate in-text
citations and references
with minor deviations from
APA style.

When the candidate uses

sources, the candidate
provides appropriate in-text
citations and references
with no readily detectable
deviations from APA style,
OR the candidate does not
use sources.

Score/Level