Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Review article
Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Yenepoya Dental College, Yenepoya University, Nithyananda Nagar Post, Deralakatte, 575018 Mangalore, Karnataka, India
Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, AB Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Nitte University, Mangalore, Karnataka, India
art ic l e i nf o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 27 October 2012
Received in revised form
12 November 2012
Accepted 7 December 2012
The present review article aims at discussing the various trends evolved in forensic dentistry, particularly
referring with the usage of radiographs. Since the radiographs are the quick, easy, simple, economical
and non-destructive method of obtaining information about age, sex, race of the victim, it is an
indispensable aid in identication. With the advancement of newer technologies, more accurate
information is obtained for identication as well as in the facial reconstruction of the unknown deceased
person. This article gives an overview of different radiographic methodology and characteristics for
identication in oral and craniofacial region. To obtain the most reliable outcome in identication it is
necessary that one applies most of these techniques repetitively with appropriate knowledge.
Crown Copyright & 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Forensic dentistry
Radiographic identication
Age estimation
Gender estimation
Race estimation
Contents
1.
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.1.
Historical review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.2.
Forensic identication . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2. Age estimation through radiographic skeletal changes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3. Gender estimation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4. Racial estimation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5. Stature estimation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6. Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1. Introduction
Forensic is derived from a Latin word forum where legal
matters are discussed. Odontology refers to the study of teeth or
dentistry [1]. Federation dentaire Internationale [FDI] dened
forensic dentistry as the branch of dentistry in the interest of
justice deals with proper handling and examination of dental
evidence with the proper evaluation and presentation of dental
ndings [2].
Human dentition is one of the most reliable means of identication. Its uniqueness has been calculated mathematically and
has been stated that about 1.8 1019 possible combinations of
32 teeth being intact, decayed, lled, missing may be present [3].
n
56
56
57
59
61
61
61
61
62
The enamel is the hardest tissue in the body and the dentition
is well insulated by the supporting alveolar bone and the oral
musculature and thus likely to survive the outward damaging
inuences like re, explosion, and putrefaction in water or soil [4].
Additionally, teeth are also relatively less affected by internal
disturbances like nutritional and endocrinal disorders. When
visual identication becomes impossible in tragic incidents, dental
evaluation sheds light on the age, sex, nationality of the deceased
person.
1.1. Historical review
The rst recorded case of dental ndings for identication was
made of a rich roman women Lollia Paulina, between 49 and
66 AD who was identied after her death through her unique
arrangement of her teeth [5]. In India, 1194 AD, King Jai Chandra of
2212-4780/$ - see front matter Crown Copyright & 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jofri.2012.12.001
K.A. Shahin et al. / Journal of Forensic Radiology and Imaging 1 (2013) 5662
57
5. Burial in many religions require a positive identication preceding entombment in geographical sites.
6. Dissolution of cases by identifying the missing persons.
7. Society's duty to preserve human rights and self-respect begins
with the basic ground of an identity.
Radiographic means of identication in forensic dentistry
mainly comprises of structures like teeth, presence of foreign
bodies, alveolar process, anatomical structures and associated
pathologies. Variability in these structures as seen in comparative
dental radiographs aids in the identication of the individual.
Individual radiographic features appreciated in the process of
identication are shown in Table 1 [13,14].
Radiographic identications are advantageous as they are
simple, easy and quick modes of obtaining the information in a
non-destructive manner in both living and deceased. Further, they
are economical compared to DNA techniques [15,16].
Comparative identication of ante-mortem and post-mortem
conventional radiographs allows the observation of anatomical
characteristics such as coronal shape and size, pulp anatomy,
positioning and shape of the alveolar bone crest, in addition to
various dental treatments [9].
Digitized techniques allow a precise analysis of the spatial
relations of teeth roots and supporting structures on ante- and
post-mortem images. They also facilitate the correct alignment
between ante- and post-mortem radiographs without the necessity of new exposures [9].
Computed tomography (CT) helps in image segmentation and
avoids superimposition of anatomical structures beyond the plane
of interest and digitized radiographs and computer assisted image
analysis also avoid the bias inherent in observer subjectivity and
increase reliability, and accuracy [16,17].
An ante-mortem CT image provides evidence of craniometric
points which can be used in the construction of a post-mortem
replica images and a complete description of the radiological
protocol and the demographic data [9].
Additionally, 3D CT images can be applied for facial recreation in
reconstructive identication [18]. Radiological determination of
manner of death in medico-legal cases by using multislicing computed tomography [MSCT] and other advanced imaging modalities
like magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], and ultrasonography [USG]
was dened to be virtopsy (virtual autopsy) technique [19].
Accordingly, radiographs can be utilized for individual identication to determine age, sex, race, stature and the cause of death
due to gunshots or any other foreign bodies. They also help in
correcting the faulty charting of the tooth for instance in the case
of mesial migration of tooth into the extraction space [13].
1. Age
1.a.
1.b.
1.c.
58
K.A. Shahin et al. / Journal of Forensic Radiology and Imaging 1 (2013) 5662
Table 1
Individual radiographic dental features appreciated in the process of identication.
Teeth
Teeth present
Teeth missing
Tooth type
Tooth position
Crown morphology
Crown pathology
Root morphology
Root pathology
Teeth pathology
Pulp morphology
Pulp pathology
Periapical pathology
Periodontal ligament
Height, contour, density of crestal bone, enostosis, bone loss, trabecular bone pattern, residual root fragments
Pattern of lamina dura
Anatomical structures
Maxillary sinus
Maxilla
Mandibular canal
TMJ joint
Abnormalities
Other pathologies
Table 2
Radiographic phases of age estimation in natal life.
Natal life [7,22]
16th week
intrauterine
26th week
intrauterine
30th week
intrauterine
At birth
K.A. Shahin et al. / Journal of Forensic Radiology and Imaging 1 (2013) 5662
59
Age estimation from sutures can be best done by skull radiographs. Neonates will have edentulous jaws with large orbit size.
At 1 year of life there will be fusion of midline symphysis, fusion of
metopic suture. At the third year of life the condylar portion of the
occipital fuses with the squama. At the fth year condylar portion
of the occipital bone fuses with basiocciput. At 25 years the
coronal, saggital and lambdoid sutures start to close. The saggital
suture is rst to close. Initially it closes near parietal foramen and
the last portion to unite is bregma around 3235 years. By 40 years
there is fusion of coronal suture and at 45 years lambdoid suture
fuses. At 60 years squamous portion of the temporal bone fuses
with parietal bone [12,14].
Age estimation from the size of the skull using cephaloometrics
has been studied and proposed corresponding to the age
[12,14,45]. Age estimation from the sinus using posterioanterior
view also has been proposed [19]. Variations in frontal size
patterns such as size, shape, symmetry, anatomical outline and
number and presence of septa and cells are matched on antemortem and post-mortem radiographic images. The frontal
sinuses are absent at birth [46] and start developing at the age
of 2 or 3 years but at a rudimentary level [47]. The development of
the frontal sinuses is more rapid in the puberty, and is completed
by 20 years of age.
60
K.A. Shahin et al. / Journal of Forensic Radiology and Imaging 1 (2013) 5662
Fig. 2. Schour and Massler illustrating 21 chronological steps from 4 months to 21 years of dental age.
Fig. 3. Demirijan's method showing eight stages of incisor, canines, premolars and molars development.
K.A. Shahin et al. / Journal of Forensic Radiology and Imaging 1 (2013) 5662
61
5. Stature estimation
3. Gender estimation
Gender determination is usually done from cephalometric and
posterioanterior views The frontal sinuses are larger in men and
the superior borders of the frontal sinuses are deeper in women
[9]. Signicant sexual dimorphism was seen in the south Indian
population in the head circumference using cephalometrics [45].
Some other prominent features distinguishing males and females
are mentioned in Table 5.
The appraisal of living stature from long bones may also hold
true to other bones as craniofacial bones but may not correlate as
decidedly.
Regression equations were obtained in relation to height to
head circumference and skull diameter (P o0.0001 for both). The
highest correlation was found when individual measurements of
combined data were plotted against height [45]. The location of
mandibular canal showed positive correlation with the stature in
linear tomograms [48].
4. Racial estimation
Similar to age and gender differences certain racial differences
also have been noted. Long pointed canine root, enamel pearls,
taurodontism (bull tooth), congenital lack of third upper molar is
seen in mongoloids [14].
Australian aborigines have larger teeth, Indians have smaller
teeth, Whites have intermediate sized teeth and the incidence of
Table 3
Apparent angle of the mandible aiding to determine the age.
Angle of the mandible in degrees
Age
160175
150160
125140
120130
90125
95115
Obtuse angle o infants
Infancy
13 years
612 years
1517 years
1821 years
3040 years
More than 40 years
6. Conclusion
Radiographs are one of the excellent tools in the eld of
forensic dentistry. Forensic odontologist can rely on radiographs
for age estimation with the various time tested methods, though
multiple methodologies should be applied before arriving at a
conclusive identication such as probable identication, possible
identication, insufcient information or exclusion. Though dental
and craniofacial radiographs are important assessment tools in
race, gender and stature estimation, due to diversity in human
physical constitutional makeup, should also be supported by other
forensic methodology and radiographs of other parts of the body.
Recognizing its importance, the radiographic storing and
record keeping should be upheld in all the dental clinics and
institutions as per the rules of the land. Further the forensic team
should always be well acknowledged with the dental and craniofacial radiography and its forensic signicance and thus include it
in its normal protocol.
Table 4
Skeletal changes seen in the growth and development of an individual.
Area
Infancy
Adult
Old age
Ramus
Mental foramen
Condyle
Table 5
Sexual dimorphism.
Characteristics
Male
Female
Skull size
Supraorbital ridge
Orbits
Forehead
Fronto nasal junction
Condyles
Cheek bone
Zygomatic arch
Gonial angle
Palate
Frontal sinus
Nasal aperture
Mandible size
Chin
Body height
Ascending ramus
Larger
More pronounced
Square, lower, smaller with rounded margins
Steeper, less rounded
Distinct angulation
Larger
Heavily, laterally arched
More pronounced
Less obtuse, prominent
Larger, broader, U shaped,
More developed
High & narrow margins
Larger
square
Greater at symphysis
Greater breadth
Smaller
Less pronounced
Round, higher, larger, sharp margins
Vertical, round
Smoothly curved
Smaller
Lighter, more pronounced
Less pronounced
More obtuse
Smaller, parabola shaped
Less developed
Lower & broader
Smaller
rounded
Smaller at symphysis
Smaller breadth
62
K.A. Shahin et al. / Journal of Forensic Radiology and Imaging 1 (2013) 5662
Table 6
Characteristic traits in different races.
Traits
Whites
Asians
Negroid
Skull
Prole
Orbit
Nasal aperture
Palate
Face
Inter orbital distance
Rounded
Straight
Triangular
Narrow & elongated
Triangular
Small
Narrow
Square
Intermediate
Higher & rounded
Rounded
Large& rounded & horse shoe
Large & attened
Intermediate
References
[1] C. Stavrianos, A. Eliades, A. Kokkas, The role of DNA in forensic odontology (part
1). DNA analysis method, Research journal of medical sciences 5 (2010)
334339.
[2] T. Shamim, V. Ipe Varughese, P.M. Shameena, S. Sudha, Forensic odontology:
a new perspective, Medicolegal Update 6 (2006) 14.
[3] S.A. Fellingham, T.J. Kotze, J.M. Nash, Probabilities of dental characteristics,
Journal of Forensic Odontostomatology 2 (1984) 4552.
[4] S.H. Al-Amad, Forensic odontology, Smile Dental Journal 4 (2009) 2224.
[5] C. Stavrianos, A. Kokkas, E. Andreopoulos, A. Eliades, Applications of forensic
dentistry. Part I, Research Journal of Medical Sciences 4 (2010) 179186.
[6] S. Goonatilake, Non-western sciencemining civilisation knowledge. Global
transformation and world future, Encyclopedia of Life Support System 1 (2009)
5680.
[7] A.S. Panchbai, Dental radiographic indicators, a key to age assessment,
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 40 (2011) 199212.
[8] N. Eckert, The history of the forensic applications in radiology, American
Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology 5 (1984) 5356.
[9] S.P.M. Carvalho, R.H. Alves da Silva, C. Lopes-Junior, A.S. Peres, Use of images for
human identication in forensic dentistry, Radiologia Brasileira 42 (2009)
112.
[10] P. Schuller-Go tzburg, J. Suchanek, Forensic odontologists successfully identify
tsunami victims in Phuket, Thailand, Forensic Science International 171 (2007)
204207.
[11] A.B. Achary, B. Sivapathasundharan, Forensic odontology, in: R. Rajendran,
B. Sivapathasundharan (Eds.), Shafer's Textbook of Oral Pathology, 6th edn,
Elsevier Private Ltd, India, 2009, pp. 871892.
[12] V. Sassouni, Dentofacial radiography in forensic dentistry, Journal of Dental
Research 42 (1963) 274302.
[13] A.I. Pretty, D. Sweet, A look at forensic dentistryPart 1. The role of teeth in
the determination of human identity, British Dental Journal 190 (2001)
359366.
[14] P.K. Dayal, Textbook of Forensic Odontology, rst edn, Paras Medical Publishers, 1998.
[15] S.I. Kvaal, K.M. Kolltveit, I.O. Thomsen, T. Solheim, Age estimation of adults
from dental radiographs, Forensic Science International 74 (1995) 175185.
[16] S. Saxena, Age estimation of Indian adults from orthopantomographs,
Brazilian Oral Research 25 (2011) 225229.
[17] R. Cameriere, L. Ferrante, M. Cingolani, Variations in pulp/tooth area ratio as
an indicator of age: a preliminary study, Journal of Forensic Science 49 (2004)
317319.
[18] S.S. Rocha, D.L.P. Ramos, M.G.P. Cavalcanti, Applicability of 3D-CT facial
reconstruction for forensic individual identication, Pesquisa Odontolgica
Brasileira 17 (2003) 2428.
[19] E. Tatlisumak, M.S. Asirdizer, Usability of CT images of frontal sinus in forensic
personal identication, Theory and Applications of CT Imaging and Analysis, 1,
InTech publisher257268 (chapter 15).
[20] S. Singaraju, P. Sharda, Age estimation using pulptooth area ratio: a digital
image analysis, Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences 1 (2009) 3741.
[21] D. Sweet, Why a dentist for identication. Forensic odontology, Dental Clinics
of North America 45 (2001) 217249.
[22] L. Ciapparelli, The chronology of dental development and age assessment, in: D.
H. Clark (Ed.), Practical forensic odontology, Wright Butterworth-Heinemann
Ltd, Oxford, 1992, pp. 2242.
[23] R. Cameriere, L. Ferrante, M. Belcastro, B. Bonaglioli, E. Rastelli, M. Cingolani,
Age estimation by pulp/tooth ratio in canines by periapical X-rays, Journal of
Forensic Science 52 (2007) 166170.
[24] D.K. Whittakar, D.G. McDonald, Age determination from teeth, A Color Atlas of
Forensic Dentistry, Wolfe Medical Publications Ltd, England, 1989, pp. 5866.
[25] R. Cameriere, L. Ferrante, M. Cingoloni, Age estimation in children by
measurement of open apices in teeth, International Journal of Legal Medicine
120 (2006) 4952.
[26] B. Rai, S.C. Anand, Age estimation in children from dental radiograph:
a regression equation, Internet Journal of Biological Anthropology 1 (15)
(2008) 25.
[27] I. Schour, M. Massler, Development of human dentition, Journal of American
Dental Association 20 (1941) 379427.
[28] C.F.A. Moorees, E.A. Fanning, E.E. Hunt, Age variation of formation stages for
ten permanent teeth, Journal of Dental Research 42 (1963) 14901502.
[29] A. Demirjian, H. Goldstein, J.M. Tanner, A new system of dental age assessment, Human Biology 45 (1973) 211227.
[30] G. Willems, A. Vanolmen, B. Spiessens, C. Carles, Dental age estimation in
Belgian children: Demirjian's technique revisited, Journal of Forensic Science
46 (2001) 125127.
[31] N.N. Nik-Hussein, K.M. Kee, P. Gan, Validity of Demirjian and Willems
methods for dental age estimation for Malaysian children aged 515 years
old, Forensic Science International 204 (2011) 208.e1208.e6.
[32] S. Koshy, S. Tandon, Dental age assessment: the applicability of Demirjian's
method in South Indian children, Forensic Science International 94 (1998)
7385.
[33] R.J. Hegde, P.B. Sood, Dental maturity as an indicator of chronological age:
radiographic evaluation of dental age in 6 to 13 years children of Belgaum
using Demirjian methods, Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and
Preventive Dentistry 20 (2002) 132138.
[34] R.M.R. Eid, R.I. Sim, M.N.P. Friggi, M. Fishberg, Assessment of dental maturity
of Brazilian children aged 614 years using Demirjian's method, International
Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 12 (2002) 423428.
[35] H. Mornstad, M. Reventlid, A. Teivens, The validity of four methods for age
estimation by teeth in Swedish children, Swedish Dental Journal 19 (1995)
121130.
[36] S.A. Mani, L. Naing, J. John, A.R. Samsudin, Comparison of two methods of
dental age estimation in 715-year-old Malays, International Journal of
Paediatric Dentistry 18 (2007) 380388.
[37] R. Nykanen, L. Espeland, S.I. Kvaal, O. Krogstad, Validity of the Demirjian
method for dental age estimation when applied to Norwegian children, Acta
Odontologica Scandinavica 56 (1998) 238244.
[38] E.S. Tunc, A.E. Koyuturk, Dental age assessment using Demirjian's method on
northern Turkish children, Forensic Science International 175 (2008) 2326.
[39] S. Al-Emran, Dental age assessment of 8.5 to 17 year-old Saudi children using
Demirjian's method, Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice 9 (2008) 6471.
[40] C.M. Nolla, The development of permanent teeth, Journal of Dentistry for
Children 27 (1960) 254266.
[41] M.P.J. Harris, C.J. Nortje, The mesial root of the third mandibular molar, Journal
of Forensic Odontostomatology 2 (1984) 3943.
[42] A.G. Drusini, The coronal pulp cavity index: a forensic tool forage determination in human adults, Cuad Med Forensic 5354 (2008) 235249.
[43] P.J. Van Heerden, The mesial root of the third mandibular molar as a possible
indicator of age, Dissertation for Diploma in Forensic Odontology, London
Hospital Medical College, 1985.
[44] B. Karaarslan, E.S. Karaarslan, A.S. Ozsevikc, E. Ertasc, Age estimation for
dental patients using orthopantomographs, European Dental Journal 4 (2010)
389394.
[45] S. Kalia, S.K. Shetty, K. Patil, V.G. Mahima, Stature estimation using odontometry and skull anthropometry, Indian Journal of Dental Research 19 (2008)
150154.
[46] L. Kullman, B. Eklund, R. Grundin, The value of the frontal sinus in identication of unknown persons, Indian Journal of Dental Research 8 (1990) 310.
[47] M. Yoshino, S. Miyasaka, H. Sato, et al., Classication system of frontal sinus
patterns by radiography. Its application to identication of unknown skeletal
remains, Forensic Science International 34 (1987) 289299.
[48] K.A. Shahin, L. Chatra, P. Shenai, Stature estimating the location of maxillary
sinus and mandibular canal, North American Journal of Medical Sciences
4 (2012) 586589.