Speech of Reichsführer-SS Heinrich Himmler

at Posen 4 October 1943

Translation of Document No. 1919-PS, Nuremberg Trial

Translated by Carlos Porter

Introduction

When first confronted with this new translation of Heinrich Himmler's famous speech at
Posen, I wondered what new insights could possibly be gained. Himmler's speech is one
of the most quoted documents in any study of the Holocaust, whether from a revisionist
or a traditional perspective. I quickly realized that Porter has provided a great service in
that he has translated the entire document 1919-PS (as it was classified during the
Nuremberg Trials.) This new translation runs over 24,000 words.

Reading Himmler's speech in its entirety, rather than the usual out-of-context
quotations, results in a new level of understanding. Brief, out-of-context quotations
have been used to support the orthodox Holocaust story since the end of the Second
World War. For example, Lucy Dawidowicz cited the Himmler speech in her book, The
War Against the Jews 1933-1945. She reproduced however only 197 of the more than
24,000 words and these with a translation which directly supports her thesis.
Dawidowicz is not alone in the misleading use of the Posen speech. Gerald Reitlinger,
in his volume, The Final Solution also quotes from the Posen speech. Reitlinger
reproduces 205 of the 24,000 words.

Carlos Porter has also provided interesting insights in his translation of the various
controversial terms used by Himmler: ausrotten, ausmerzen, umbringen and
totschlagen. Besides his translation of these German terms, Porter shows that all of
these terms are used multiple times during the speech and that each is used at least
once in a figurative sense. The less suspicious phrases in which these terms are used
are never quoted in the traditional literature.

Many of those who accept the orthodox version of the Holocaust story refuse to
accept Porter's translation of Ausrottung, and the other terms which are typically
translated to mean extermination. Porter's translation shows that there can be a benign
interpretation of these words, especially when taken within the context of the entire
speech.

In 1993, Robert Wolfe, supervisory archivist for captured German records at the
National Archives admitted that a more precise translation of Ausrottung would be
extirpation or tearing up by the roots. Wolfe also pointed out that in Himmler's
handwritten notes for the speech, that Himmler used the term, Judenevakuierung, or
evacuation of the Jews, not extermination.

Why is so much time spent considering the text of this particular speech from 1943?
The Posen speech has been called the "best evidence" to rebut the claims that the
Holocaust is a myth. Before being moved to the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum,
Himmler's speech was housed at the National Archives near the main entrance to the
building only a few yards from the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and the Declaration
of Independence. Clearly, the exterminationist interpretation of this document provides
one of the primary justifications for the power structure of our post-World-War-II
society. --Richard A.Widmann

Translator's Notes:

The author of the document (whoever he is) uses at least 4 different words which can be
translated as "kill or exterminate":
- "ausrotten" and "ausmerzen", almost exactly equivalent terms, are usually translated as
"extirpate, exterminate, kill", with a number of figurative meanings;

- "umbringen" and "totschlagen" are usually translated as "kill", in a literal sense.

In this text, ALL FOUR TERMS are used figuratively at least once: see pp. 94, 96, 101
of original, i.e., (killing the Third Reich <totschlagen>, killing loyalty <umbringen>,
extirpating disputatiousness <ausmerzen>, exterminating laziness, <ausrotten>).

"Ausrotten" is also used figuratively by Hitler in his famous Berlin Sportpalast speech
of February 1933: "den Marxismus und seine Begleiterscheinungen aus Deutschland
auszurotten" -- "to extirpate Marxism and its accompanying phenomena from
Germany".

"Ein Volk auszurotten" (p. 66) can be translated "exterminate or kill a people or race",
or, alternatively, "get rid of a rabble, crowd, mob", etc..

"Umfallen" (p. 23), translated at Nuremberg as "die", means "to fall down", and is
used figuratively on p. 50 <to give up>.

"Ausnutzen" (p. 25), translated at Nuremberg as "exploit", can also mean "use".

I have translated some parts more freely than others; the style is mostly very informal,
larded with sarcasm and slang, but not without a certain eloquence.

I have marked illogical remarks or uncertain terminology with a <?>; for example, it
seems strange to speak of "hard times" beginning in Germany in 1936-7 (p. 93). I know
that the Moscow subway was built with forced labour, including that of women, but I
question the utility of "child labour" in digging anti-tank ditches (p. 24).

There are apparently no missing pages; most of what the document contains appears
logical in context; it appears to be a transcription of stenographic notes typed by
someone with very little education, probably with two fingers. It may have been retyped
to make it more incriminating. It was "retyped" (more or less) to typeset it at
Nuremberg. We don't know who took the stenographic notes or how accurate they were,
or even who did the typing.
 In the first paragraph, Eicke has just been killed.

1919-PS Speech of the Reichsführer-SS at the SS Group Leader Meeting

in Posen on 4 October 1943.

Ceremony in Honour of the Fallen

In the months which have past since we last met in June of 1942, many comrades have
fallen and given their lives for Germany and for the Führer. Before them, in the
forefront -- I ask you to stand in their honour, and in the honour of all our dead SS men
and dead German soldiers, men and women -- in the forefront, from our ranks, <let us
honour> our old comrade and friend, SS Obergruppenführer Eicke. (The Group
Leaders rise from their seats). I ask you to sit.

The situation in the fifth year of the war

I have considered it necessary to call you all together, the High Leadership Corps of the
SS and Police, now at the beginning of the fifth year of the war, which will be a very
difficult year of the war. Hard-headed, as we always were, in a spirit of respect for the
truth with regards to ourselves, there are several things which we wish to discuss at this
Troop Leadership Conference. Just as I was accustomed to do in long years of peace, I
wish to describe the situation as I see it, in as few words as possible, with regards to our
responsibilities and that which we have already achieved and accomplished, as well as
with regards to that which stands before us to be accomplished in the future.

The Russian leadership

First, the military situation. I will begin with Russia. When -- I believe it was in 1937 or
1938 -- the great show trials were being held in Moscow, and the ex-Czarist officer and
later Bolshevik general Tuchachevski and other generals were shot, we were, at that
time, all over Europe, even in the Party and the SS, of the opinion that the Bolshevik
system, and therefore Stalin, had made one of its most serious mistakes. We were
absolutely mistaken in this judgment of the situation. We can state this, once and for all,
in a spirit of full respect for the truth. I believe that Russia could not have withstood the
two years of war -- it is now in the third year of war -- had it retained its ex-Czarist
generals. It turned -- I'll discuss this first of all -- its political commissars into generals,
it sought out those who had grown up through the Red Army as commanders, as
generals, so that they could simultaneously act as political commissars. The stubbornest
bearers of the will of the Bolshevik... doctrine, I should like to call it, not an ideology ...
is, in Russia, simultaneously a commander and leader.

The Attack of 1941

In 1941, the Führer attacked Russia. That was, as we may well say today, shortly,
perhaps a quarter or half year before Stalin's enveloping movement prior to his great
thrust into Central and Western Europe. I can sketch out this first year with very brief
strokes. The attack was effective. The Russian army was driven together into great
pockets, destroyed, taken prisoner. We did not then value the mass man as we do now,
as raw material, as manpower. Which is not a shame in the end, if one thinks in terms of
generations, but it is regrettable today due to the loss of manpower: the prisoners died
by the tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands from exhaustion, from hunger.

The winter of 1941-1942

Then came the summer and autumn of 1941, the flush of victory which led us almost to
Moscow, the winter of 1941-42. The winter of 1941-42, with its consequences, was, on
the one hand, the work of Fate, which hit us hard for the first time; on the other hand,
however, it was the work of the political commissars, the "politruks", whose severity
and relentlessness, whose fanatical, brutal will drove the raw material of the Slavic,
Mongolian mass man to the front, and didn't let him get back out again.

The year 1942

In early 1942 then came our attacks in the Crimea, over the Donetz to the Don and to
the Volga. The bow of the German front and its allies was drawn taut. The war could
have been brought to a close for Russia in 1942 if all had held out. Since according to
all calculations, and in all probability, which must not be left out of consideration in
war, with which one must still reckon after all, the Caucasus would have fallen into our
hands sooner or later. Russia would have been cut off from its chief sources of
petroleum, and hunger would have handled its people even more roughly than is the
case today. Then came the collapse of our allies. First came the breakthrough among the
Rumanians, then the breakthrough among the Italian Army, which was already of very
little value even then, then the breakthrough and retreat of the Hungarian units: the total
loss of approximately 500 km of front. This loss required the withdrawal of the German
front, in order to be able to close it again at all. This loss made the sacrifice of
Stalingrad necessary from the point of view of Fate. It is not our intention to reflect
upon every detail here today. I am personally convinced that this sacrifice -- that sounds
dreadfully harsh when I say so now -- was necessary, since, without the link-up of
enemy forces around Stalingrad, it would no longer have been possible to close the
German front. That will, I am convinced, be the finding of military historical research
10, 15, or 20 years after the war. At the same time, a very late consolation.

The year 1943.

The first great battle for Kharkhov then came early this year. Kharkhov was evacuated
under sometimes -- this is known to every one of our units out there -- very peculiar
circumstances. At the right time, then, upon the order of the Führer, the tank corps
arrived in Kharkhov under the leadership of our old comrade, SS Obergruppenführer
Hausser. The deliberate evacuation of Kharkhov was also carried out by Hausser using
the tank corps. A glorious campaign of several weeks then began, carried out by this
corps in an unusually mobile manner in the open field, a manner I consider truly correct
and downright true to type for motorized and tank units. Our tank corps drove the
enemy; Sepp Dietrich was the first to break into Kharkhov with his Leibstandarte.
Kharkhov was retaken, and the German front was reestablished.

In late spring and summer of this year, we replied to the attacks of the Russians with a
big counterattack at Bielgorod. We can report with pride that the only corps which
really penetrated the deeply entrenched system of Russian positions was our SS Tank
Division, with the Standarte "Deutschland" in front of the old Division "Das Reich".
The Russians had built a position 7 km deep, a model and an example such as we
Germans ought never to forget: to work hard, to dig in, and build positions. Because the
hard work, the sweat poured out in so doing, will save the lives of tens of thousands.
We Germans have still not really learned this after four years of war. If we had to give a
grade for this like in school, the best the Germans could get for building their positions
would be between 4 and 5 <i.e., D or F>. I must acknowledge one thing here: our SS
Divisions have learned a great deal over the past 2 years, and generally build their
positions very assiduously.

In the middle of this operation on the eastern front came the necessary withdrawal of a
great number of divisions to Italy. That was why we could not counter as forcefully as
necessary the Russian attack, which we could have terminated with a catastrophe for the
Russians if we had had ten more tank divisions, purely on the grounds of strength.

The human potential of the Russians

Here I would like to say a few words on evaluating the total strength of the Russians.
An element basic to an overall evaluation is the question of Russian population figures.
That is the great riddle. Population estimates for that country, which has been
hermetically sealed off for decades, range from 170 to 250 million. I have taken a lot of
trouble with this question, and have had studies prepared starting with the first Czarist
censuses, that is, the first censuses ever carried out in Russia. At that time, the
Bolshevik tendency to conceal everything from Europe and the world -- from the
building of a street which is not indicated on any map, to the concealment of large
industries manufacturing tanks and airplanes, and which are shown to the European
Info-tourist as "tractor factories", while tanks are built in the next hall -- did not yet
exist. I had census figures brought to me which were not gathered under this law of
camouflage and concealment, decades before the Bolshevik administration. These
figures enable one to perceive a certain increase, a gradual growth. We came to the
conclusion through our calculations that Russia must have two hundred people, maybe
two hundred twenty million at the very most. To describe the calculations in detail at
this time would take too long and might also be too boring. I came to the conclusion
that the Russians, in addition to the divisions on their Western front, that is, the
divisions standing directly opposite us today, have squeezed an additional 4 million
soldiers out of the body of their people early this year and over the course of the year.
That means 400 times 10,000 men, or 400 new divisions. I calculate this in
approximately the following manner: the Russians have already drafted all men born in
1926, and some of the men born in 1927. It is a tragedy according to the laws of nature
that Russian men born in 1925 to 1927 amount to 1.5 and 1.8 men respectively, while
our men born in the same years amount to only 500,000 to 600,000 <respectively?>,
that is, a third of the Russian number.

In addition, the Russians have no doubt added a lot of people to their companies by
drafting even younger men, men born in 1928. The Division "Das Reich" reports that, in
some cases, the divisions opposing us contained whole companies consisting of 14 and
15 year olds. That is entirely indifferent to the Russians; to them, only the masses count;
the masses must be trampled, stuck, and slaughtered. They are -- to use a really brutal
expression -- like a pig which has been stuck and must slowly bleed to death. The
Russians have doubtlessly further reinforced their army by an additional 1 million men
through the incorporation of auxiliary forces, that is, chiefly women and boys in the
military and supply units, general staffs, and as auxiliary machine gunners. The
Russians have apparently not received any Chinese. They have, however, recruited
another 1 million men from their small splinter nationalities, such as the Afghans (2 to 3
million people), Mongols from Outer Mongolia (2 million people), and Kirghis; these
people are perhaps not yet exhausted in terms of military purposes. I believe that all in
all they have raised another 4 million men for their offensive army.

With regards to the situation as a whole, I am, as you know, an optimist. I know that
we will win the war. That is a law of nature. But I have always been rather conservative
in my calculations, and I think I can show that I have never made a mistaken prophecy
in these matters. I therefore believe that the Russians have lost approximately 2 million
men in dead, prisoners, and disabled. We must therefore expect one more desperate total
offensive of the Russians in winter, with a strength of 200 divisions, that is,
approximately 2 million men. We must and will hold off this attack and this clash.

Absolutely nothing is endless on this earth; the potential of the Russians is not endless
either. When these Brussilov offensives, to use the expression, are finally over, the
potential of the Russians will therefore be approaching its natural end. Hunger is a
serious problem among the Russians. It is interesting that the Russians consider it
correct, with the mass man, to keep the officers and commissars physically strong and
in a good mood by feeding them an American diet, while little Ivan is fed very shabbily
with a bit of bread or similar rubbish. They are fighting the whole war through their
brutally trained leadership strata of political officers; officer-comissars or commissar-
officers; politruks or subordinate officers; subordinate officers or politruks; it has
gradually come to be all one and the same.

The partisan war

Now I come to another aspect of the war in Russia, of which there is so frightfully much
talk. When you arrive in the East, in the high staff headquarters, a map on a scale of 1 to
1 million is usually spread out in front of you. Every mine found on a certain date
anywhere along railroad tracks thousands of kilometres long is diligently entered with a
squiggle on this map on a scale of 1 to 1 million. Every attack, whether an attack on a
munitions transport or a cattle theft usual in the district, is entered with a cross or
something similar. The result is that a map like that looks all red.

You're tempted to say: "It's hopeless! Give up! There's nothing we can do". But if you
transfer the same data to a map on a normal scale, and compare it to the criminal cases
in our sheltered German fatherland, still richly supplied with policemen even today,
then it sinks to an unpleasant minor matter. But they all tell you -- if you will listen to it
-- all the lowest ranking staff members, especially in the communications zone, "It's
dreadful! The Central Army Group is cut off from the fatherland for 400 kilometres by a
belt of partisans."

When somebody tells you that, just hand him your hanky so he can dry his tears. I
always ask such people the question: "Has the Central Army Group suffered from
hunger so far?" Answer: "No." "Has their ammunition been cut off?" "No, they've
received everything." Of course, the trains are delayed for hours, half a day. "Have their
supplies been interrupted then?" "No, the Army Group is receiving its supplies."

The Vlasov ballyhoo

Then you hear the next prayer. This goes: "We were wrong about the Russians." This
song is usually sung by men from some Eastern province, who were over there in their
youth, some of whom have written very good books and had a Russian mother, too, and
now they tell stories. It is also sung by the little political vagabonds whom we first came
to know in the eastern struggle against Poland, whom we rejected at home, and who
have now been drafted as soldiers, officers and majors, and are still peddling their
intellectual poison under cover of the uniform of our decent German army. Goaded on
by this propaganda tendency -- I can't call it anything else -- they tell you so many
stories, or write them home by military post (and the stories then trickle down from top
to bottom): "Yes, we were wrong about the Russians. The Russians are not at all the
robot" (this is the expression used most frequently) "that we thought they were in 1941.
Now that we're over here in the East, our eyes have been opened. The Russians are a
noble people, and so on and so forth, a collection of all virtues. We just have to educate
them as National Socialists, the best thing would be to create a NSRAP or something
similar. Then they would" -- this is the next bit -- "form the army of liberation under
General Vlasov". Then comes the following, which is a constant claim of General
Vlasov: "Russia can only be freed by Russians. Germany has so far never been able to
defeat the Russians". So give Vlasov 500,000 or 1,000,000 Russians, arm them well,
train them insofar as possible according to German principles, and Vlasov is so noble,
that he'll go off against the Russians and kill them for us.

People can blow off a great deal of stuff and nonsense; that wouldn't be so dangerous.
But when a piece of nonsense like this has the end effect that a glorious army, looking
back on hundreds of years of tradition like the German one, begins to doubt its own
strength due to the gossip of politically untrained little officers of higher or lower
service grades -- the little bundle of proverbs who talks like this doesn't even notice how
devastating it is when he says: "We cannot beat the Russians, they can only do that
themselves" -- then that is dangerous. Everybody you ask, "How's the Russian
infantry?", will tell you, with pathetic thoughtlessness (since the two things don't go
together logically, after all): "The Russian infantry is garbage. We are vastly superior to
them." But: Russians can only be defeated by Russians.

I wouldn't have had any objections, if we had hired Mr. Vlasov and every other Slavic
subject wearing a Russian general's uniform, to make propaganda against the Russians.
I wouldn't have any objections at all. Wonderful.

Brig. Fegelein and the Russian general

Our comrade Fegelein once captured a Russian general like that. Look, they're cheap.
They're Slavs. Full of humour, as Fegelein is, Fegelein told his staff: "We'll treat this
one real good. We'll act like we're going to recognize him as a General. So, when he
comes in, stand up, stand at attention, keep quiet, say 'General Sir, this' and 'General Sir,
that', show him how much respect you have for him". Of course, this worked. You don't
need to give a Russian general any political ideas, political ideals, or political plans for
the future. You can get them cheaper than that, gentlemen. The Slavs are known for
that.
 The Slav is never able to build anything himself. In the long run, he's not capable of it.
I'll come back to this later. With the exception of a few phenomena produced by Asia
every couple of centuries, through that mixture of two heredities which may be
fortunate for Asia but is unfortunate for us Europeans -- with the exception, therefore, of
an Attilla, a Ghenghis Khan, a Tamerlaine, a Lenin, a Stalin -- the mixed race of the
Slavs is based on a sub-race with a few drops of blood of our blood, blood of a leading
race; the Slav is unable to control himself and create order. He is able to argue, able to
debate, able to disintegrate, able to offer resistance against every authority and to revolt.
But these human shoddy goods are just as incapable of maintaining order today as they
were 700 or 800 years ago, when they called in the Varangians, when they called in the
Ruriks <Vikings called in to settle Russia>.

Every Russian, every Slav, likes to hear himself talk. An old story. If you encourage
them: "Please tell us, we place the highest value on your opinion. After all, we can only
learn from you", then you won't find a single Russian commissar who won't fall for this;
it's like tickling them with a peacock feather, just like this. Our Fegelein treated his
general that way, and his general told us everything that such a brave, courageous
commander really shouldn't ever tell at all, everything from his battery positions to his
divisional marching plans and orders (he had a whole offensive army). He gave us
everything ripe for the slaughter. It was clear in his mind that after all his blabbering --
he was never asked anything directly, not with a single word -- that he really couldn't go
back to Little Father Stalin, even though he wore the Order of Stalin number seven
hundred and something, a sort of Great Knight's Cross from over there, which he then
gave Fegelein as a gift. Fegelein gave the medal to the Fuehrer, and the Fuehrer gave it
back to Fegelein in a very nice silver box. Just thought I'd mention it.

Vlasov again

When Fegelein told me the story of the general, I said, "Sure, we can do everything. The
man gets promised everything and he'll get it, too. He gets the pension of a German
lieutenant general (he's a Russian lieutenant general). He gets good food, liquor,
women."

That's really disgustingly cheap. A torpedo costs, what do I know, 10,000 marks, as
soon as we fire it. The preliminary concentrated artillery fire for a single division or
corps costs many hundreds of thousands. We don't even know whether the fire will be
as effective in every case as when we buy just one cheap Russian general.

Of course, it doesn't go like that formally; you don't say, "You get 100,000 marks
down, now betray everything to us". Of course, he won't do it. Comrade Slav has a few
points of honour here. You have to go about it differently. Let's figure it out. How much
pension does he get? 1,500 marks a month, that's 18,000 marks a year. Let him live 10
years, that's 180,000 marks. Miscellaneous expenditure is 20,000 marks. That's 200,000
marks total. It's really cheap if you get a Russian offensive army for it. You can do that
with every Russian general, every one. We really shouldn't take them so seriously. If we
could do that, then things would go right. But we Germans handle it so badly, I must
say, in the state and the armed forces, that even many a Party comrade has walked on
that bird's lime and gotten stuck.
 Mr. Vlasov has made speeches in Paris, in Brussels, in Berlin. At his feet sat
astonished members of the German leadership corps; their mouths hang wide open, their
noses fall right down into their mouths out of sheer astonishment: "Golly! That
Bolshevik can do simply everything". And they let that butcher's assistant tell them so. I
took the trouble to read his whole speech once. I'll write an opinion on this speech, and
send it to you in the near future. Mr. Vlasov says: "It's a shame how the Germans treat
the Russian people. We Russians abolished corporal punishment decades ago". (Sure,
they abolished it. That's why they shoot them now instead. That's just another kind of
incentive.) "You Germans re-introduced corporal punishment, oh, how barbarous, how
low-down." Everybody in the audience feels ashamed. A few minutes later he claims:
"How nationalistic the Russians are, you must appeal to their nationalistic soul". Can't
you just see how the victor over Field Marshal Paulus, General X (I no longer recall his
name), who was locked up by the GPU for years, beaten, whipped, and tortured, so that
he suffers from hip pain even today and has a severe head injury, was victorious over
Paulus at Stalingrad out of pure nationalism?

Nobody contradicts him. I though the Russians had abolished corporal punishment.
Apparently, among the Russians, only the generals are beaten, to get better results out of
them. This Vlasov ballyhoo has gone around Germany without contradiction. Instead of
skilfully making propaganda out of it, to disintegrate the Russian army, this propaganda
has been turned against us, and has to some extent paralysed the strength of resistance
and the will to resist of our own ranks through errors and false notions.

Ruling with a minority

I have felt obligated here to speak of these things quite openly here, with absolutely no
rancour against anyone. All the things that we are still doing wrong, that we still can't
do right, that is, how to act with regards to foreign peoples, the domination of masses of
foreign blood by a small minority of the upper crust, all these things just have to be
learned. We of the old Reich, I'm speaking of little Germany, have only been a Reich
for 70 years. We have not yet had the opportunity to rule large political minorities, or
even majorities, with a German minority, like the Ostmark in Old Austria, with its
minority of 12 million Germans, ruling 40 to 50 million members of foreign races in the
Balkans. Nor have we had the opportunity to learn to rule millions, hundreds of
millions, with a minority, as England does, having learned how for 300 years.

We must take things as they are. We will learn that too; and if we could rise from the
dead again in 100 years, we would see that our grandchildren and great-grandchildren
will already be better at it than we are. I wish to instruct the SS in all these things. I
believe that we are best protected from error through our self-assured racial attitude. We
must also learn a great deal ourselves. We'll do it, I believe, to put it modestly for once,
the least badly, relatively speaking, and with the fewest mistakes.

Psychology of the Slavs

& Now, back to the Slavs! I consider it necessary to speak to each other about this once
again. Whether it's Peter the Great or the late Czars, whether it's Lenin or Stalin, they
know their own people. They are perfectly well aware that the concepts of "loyalty",
"never betraying", "never conspiring", have no place in the Russian vocabulary.
 Whatever people may tell you about the Russians, it's all true. It's true that some of the
Russians are fervently pious, and fervently believe in the Mother of God of the Khasans
or someplace else, it's absolutely true. It's true that the Volga boatmen sing beautifully;
it's true that the Russian of today, in modern times, is a good improviser and good
technician. It's true, for the most part, that he's even a lover of children. It's true that he
can work very hard. And it's just as true that he is stinking lazy. It's just as true that he is
an uninhibited beast, who can torture and torment other people in ways a devil would
never permit himself to think of. It's just as true that the Russian, high or low, is inclined
to the perversest of things, even devouring his comrades or keeping his neighbour's liver
in his lunch bag. It's all part of the scale of feelings and values of the Slavic peoples. It's
often purely a matter of chance which lot he draws; and to people who don't know the
beast, he is often a very great riddle: what is the fellow up to now?

The Russians themselves know each other very well, and have invented a very
practical system, whether it was the Czars with the Ochrana, or Mr. Lenin and Mr.
Stalin with the GPU or the NKVD. When four Russians get together, with little father,
little mother, and their little children, not one of the 4 or 5 knows who is betraying
whom at the moment: which one is the informer betraying the father now: is it the
mother, or the daughter? And who, in return, is betraying them? In doubtful cases there
may be two, even three, informers in this family. I am not exaggerating. This remark is
entirely accurate with regards to the city. In the countryside, our comrades who have
been over there in the East can confirm that there are still 20 or 30 NKVD informers
and agents in every village, even after the withdrawal of the Bolsheviks. This ensures,
to an absolute certainty, that no conspiracy can get started, because everything will still
be reported to the top by means of this informer apparatus. Then comes the pistol or
deportation, and that is how this entire people must be governed.

Heart in the wrong place

It is basically wrong for us to project our whole harmless soul and heart, all our good
nature, our idealism, onto foreign peoples. This applies to Herder, who wrote the
"Voices of the Peoples", probably in a drunken hour, and caused us, in later generations,
such boundless suffering and misery. That applies to the Czechs and Slovenes, to
whom, after all, we brought their national feeling. They themselves were absolutely
incapable of it; rather, we invented it for them.

For the SS Man, one principle must apply absolutely: we must be honest, decent,
loyal, and comradely to members of our own blood, and to no one else. What happens
to the Russians, the Czechs, is totally indifferent to me. Whatever is available to us in
good blood of our type, we will take for ourselves, that is, we will steal their children
and bring them up with us, if necessary. Whether other races live well or die of hunger
is only of interest to me insofar as we need them as slaves for our culture; otherwise that
doesn't interest me. Whether 10,000 Russian women fall down <umfallen> from
exhaustion in building a tank ditch is of interest to me only insofar as the tank ditches
are finished for Germany.

We will never be hard and heartless when it is not necessary; that is clear. We
Germans, the only ones in the world with a decent attitude towards animals, will also
adopt a decent attitude with regards to these human animals; but it is a sin against our
own blood to worry about them and give them ideals, so that our sons and grandchildren
will have a harder time with them. When somebody comes to me and says, "I can't build
tank ditches with children <?> or women. That's inhumane, they'll die doing it." Then I
must say: "You are a murderer of your own blood, since, if the tank ditches are not
built, then German soldiers will die, and they are the sons of German mothers. That is
our blood." That is how I would like to indoctrinate this SS, and, I believe, have
indoctrinated, as one of the holiest laws of the future: our concern, our duty, is to our
people, and to our blood. That is what we must care for and think about, work for and
fight for, and nothing else. Everything else can be indifferent to us. I wish the SS to face
the problem of all foreign, non-Germanic peoples, particularly the Russians, with this
attitude. Everything else is moonshine, a fraud against our own people, and an obstacle
to earlier victory in the war.

Russian soldiers on our side

One thing is a matter of course in this war: it is better for a Russian to die than a
German. If we use the Russians, then they must be mixed with Germans in a ratio of 1:2
to 1:3. The best thing is to use individual Russians; then you can drive with them in a
tank. One Russian with 2 or 3 Germans in a tank, magnificent, nothing wrong. But you
must never let one Russian meet other tank-driving Russians, otherwise the boys will
conspire. But if you wish to have Russian-only companies for some reason, then be
careful, gentlemen -- and that is not just a thought, gentlemen, that is an order,
gentlemen -- they must have their informer apparatus, their NKVD, in this company.
Then you can sleep in peace. Otherwise, this is one of the earliest warnings I've issued,
take care that these sub-humans always look at you; they must always look their
superior in the eye. It's like with animals. As long as an animal looks his tamer in the
eye, he won't try anything. But have no doubt about one thing: he is a beast. We will
able to utilize <ausnutzen> the Russians with this attitude; with this attitude we shall be
superior to the Slavs at all times. But not with any other attitude.

The Russian theatre of war today

Now back to the military situation! We are in a foreshortened position today. It is a

shame that we had to give up the Donetz Basin. We have given it up. That will in no
way decide or influence the outcome of the war at all. It is advantageous to us to have a
short, straight front in this way; it will be extended, and must be extended, with all our
strength; it will then form our East Wall with the shortest, straightest connections to the
rear. All in all, this offers one very great advantage. The enemy has now regained the
great area which we previously had to conquer, large expanses of which we seriously
damaged. I view the offensive of the Russians this winter with calm. I am convinced
that we can hold off this last great lunge of the desperate beast. And then, he wouldn't
be a Slav if he didn't suddenly show signs of very severe exhaustion, and I mean
intellectual exhaustion.

The Italian theatre of war

Now for Italy, the other theatre of war! There must be no doubt in our minds that the
weakness of this people lies in their blood, in their race. In considering this problem, we
must distinguish between that which is comfortable or uncomfortable for us today, and
that which will be comfortable or uncomfortable for us in the future. Italy was a weak
ally, beginning with Greece and Africa, and ending with Russia. There is, after all, no
nation which hasn't thrashed the Italians, from whom the Italians haven't taken a
beating. The Italians, we can see this right now, will be considered the most
contemptible people in the world; no one, no Albanian, no Montenegrin, no Frenchman,
no American, no Englishman, no Russian, no German, will have any respect for them,
since they have proven themselves everywhere to be cowards, as soldiers, as men. That
is the most contemptible judgement that one can hand down against a people and a race.
We must therefore distinguish between that which is comfortable for us today and that
which would be comfortable for us in the future. If the Italians were a neighbour truly
related to us in terms of inner qualities, then it would be magnificent if Italy had
remained strong. But with a consistently weak neighbour who has no resistance to
anything, the situation as it is, I must say, is much better. It is considerably better. At the
moment, it is uncomfortable; it came at an inconvenient time. If the betrayal had come a
quarter of a year later, it would have been better for us. But you can't hope for that in
war. Fate simply doesn't ask what you want. It throws you heavy punches. In the long-
distant future, we will be thankful to Fate and to God that it happened as it did.

The failure of the Italians

I've already said that the Italians have failed everywhere. Pantelleria, to take only one
characteristic example, capitulated with 12,000 men after the loss of 36 killed and 120
wounded over the course of six weeks. They had enough water -- the report of the
honourable commander of Pantelleria was not true -- for the garrison of 12,000 men,
probably for another 10 to 12 days. I personally believe they had enough water for even
longer. The island could simply not be taken, every expert says so; even the airplane
hangars were underground, built into rock casemates. They simply couldn't be gotten
out of there. Something must be said here: the surrender of Pantelleria was tragic insofar
as the Duce consolidated the island, exactly as he built the Italian air force, exactly as he
created the Italian navy. That navy was his work, his navy. But these people, one can
really say, are still Italians after all; the Duce is the only one who embodies and bears in
himself the great Roman tradition.

The Italian army in Sicily didn't defend itself. It showed the white flag everywhere,
right away. Then came the betrayal. That was very hard for us, since we were in the
midst of transporting our divisions. Based on news reports, I was already convinced of
the disintegration of Italy one and half years ago. The army was infected with
Communism and was sympathetic to the Anglo-Saxons. We couldn't carry out the
counter stroke before enough German divisions were over the Alps.

The liberation of the Duce

Next came the real implementation of the armistice. And then came the -- how should I
say -- bold stroke of our SS men and the men the Luftwaffe, the liberation of the Duce. I
was very happy that the work of the Security Service could be mentioned for once, after
all these years, since it is precisely the task of the Security Police and Security Service
to work in silence. Their work is never mentioned, cannot be mentioned. Their men die
as bravely as our men do at the front, but their work must not be mentioned. That which
they provide in terms of important information and documents, the importance of that
which they do, can never be mentioned. Thus, it pleased me greatly that the Security
Service -- the work of our friend Heydrich, which is being carrying on in a dignified and
forceful manner by his successor Kaltenbrunner -- was able to show for once, in public,
that it is strong and gets results.

The liberation of the Duce, insofar as I could tell everywhere, met with an
unprecedented response in our people, and gave them an unprecedented boost. But it
was also interesting because it was taught us that virtues like loyalty and comradeship
are values of the mind which are profoundly rooted, not only in the German people, but
in the entire European group of peoples. Let us never underestimate the value, the
unique eternal value, of this ideal. The manner in which our people reacted to this act of
comradeship and loyalty was therefore a shining example and a gleaming proof of this
fact.

The Balkans

I will briefly list the individual nations of the Balkans. Croatia, for the moment in
serious disorder, is a state made up of <page 30 missing, but text continues
apparently without interruption on page 31> 6 1/2 million men, of whom 3 1/2
million are Croats. 2 million are Bratislavs, that is, a kind of Serb, and 1 million are
Bosnians. It is a state with very large minorities. Its national leader, Poglawnik, entered
office as a result of the difficult conditions imposed upon him by the Italians, and
placed at a disadvantage by the fact that he was forced to renounce the largest and most
valuable parts of his country. It was obvious that he not enjoy any authority in this
manner. Most of the country was occupied by the Italian army. The bands under Mr.
Tito -- he has become a sort of popular hero there -- and Mr. Draha Mihailovitsch --
Tito is the Communist man, Draha Mihailowitsch is the Yugoslavian-English-American
man -- dominated the situation.

The situation in Slovenia is similar. Albania's independence was now recognized by

us. Serbia is naturally the hotbed of conspiracy in the Balkans, yet it is relatively quiet.
Greece is also somewhat quieter for the moment.

It is clear that we must concentrate large numbers of troops to the Balkans in order to
shield and protect this part of Europe exposed by the collapse of our ally. We must
expect attacks there by the Anglo-Americans. <page 32 missing; apparently
misnumbered, since the ideas appear to follow>

It is naturally of interest that the Balkans are one of the principal objects of strife
between Russia and the Anglo-Americans. Russia says: that's my sphere. And the
Anglo-Americans say: that's our sphere. The best fruits for us will grow out of the
perpetual strife between our noble allies.

The other occupied territories

France, the Netherlands, Norway, Denmark, Belgium, Poland, Bohemia, and Moravia --
the situation is known. We must be on the lookout everywhere, that is clear. We must
expect acts of sabotage, paratroop attacks, minor rebellions, strikes, insubordination,
and irresolution everywhere, even among the favourably-minded elements of the
population. In the germanic countries, one thing is quite clear to me: the majority of the
people in these germanic countries, in the bottom of their hearts, will only be won over
when the die has been cast in the present struggle between the two germanic Empires,
that is, the German and British empires, when it is seen who is the stronger. They will
then fall to the stronger. It is disagreeable to us that they do not come to us with open
hearts. But it cannot be denied that the political preconditions for this did not exist.

There were no great figures -- this is the tragedy of the renewal movements in
Holland, in Flanders, in Norway, and in Denmark -- able to win their people over to us
and lead them into the germanic political community today, according to their own
political laws. It is perhaps -- even probably -- best, from a historical point of view, that
this is so difficult. The select few who come to us, and fight in our germanic volunteer
units, in our germanic corps (such as the 3rd SS Tank Corps) are naturally some of the
most valuable members of the germanic nations. These men, who fought their through
to us from out of 30 million germanic people, who were trained among us, will be the
old fighters of the greater germanic community.

The sabotage war

We must, of course, anticipate an increase in the most unpleasant forms of sabotage, the
use of poisons, explosives, briefly, with everything. These are things that we have to
pay attention to, which must be taken seriously down to the minutest detail, but whose
objective -- wearing down our nerves and spoiling our good humour -- must never be
permitted to succeed. I say this in full awareness that every detail must be taken
seriously in this war. But we must consider nothing a tragedy, since all these things do
not kill us. They cannot kill us; they are pinpricks, they are unpleasant, they hem us in
here and there; but they cannot wound us mortally. Mortally -- I would like to
emphasize this here for the first time -- there is only one thing that can hurt us: a
weakening of our will to resist. He who, in spirit and determination, refuses to give in,
cannot be defeated, unless he can be starved out, which is not the case with us, if he
stays strong, as a man and as a soldier, if he has his weapons, and cannot be overcome
with these.

The air war

Since the Luftwaffe, which possessed an absolute mastery of the air in the first years of
the war, has had to stretch itself out to great theatres of war all over Europe, and it has
naturally had to be spread thinner. Since we had to intervene in Italy in battles involving
the heaviest sacrifices to protect the security of our supply lines, since neither the Italian
fleet nor the Italian air force could protect our supply lines to Africa to any significant
degree, we have suffered much attrition in Italy.

The terror attacks on our country have doubtlessly hurt us badly in many places. I am
firmly convinced, I would like to say that I can state definitely, that the worst is over,
that we have found a tactic to break these air attacks, that, through work, we can
multiply our aircraft production and improve our weapons. I am firmly convinced that
we will have overcome the chief dangers of the situation by the end of this year or the
beginning of the next year, that we will be active again during the coming year.

The naval war

We really had some bad days for a time this year. Fate tested us once again. Just when
problems were appearing on the eastern front, just when treason was raising its ugly
head in Italy, when the air attacks were getting terrible, the U boat war was interrupted,
too.

As always in war, things go back and forth. Sometimes offensive weapons are
stronger, sometimes defensive weapons. We just went through a period during which
the defensive weapons of the English were stronger, were technically superior to ours.
For months, therefore, the U boat war had to be restricted to a minimum. As you have
seen from the reports of the last 14 days, we are now active again. Offensive weapons
have once again recovered and surpassed the enemy's technical lead, and offensive
weapons are now once again at an advantage. That is an example and a lesson that one
must never give up, that a cause is only lost -- technically, militarily, spiritually -- when
one gives up. If the Reichsmarschall in the air force or marines, if Grossadmiral Doenitz
in the navy, had said, after the low point, "There's no point, the others are too powerful,
they're better equipped technically, the U boat is out of date, or our air force, or some
technical development or other, is out of date", then the enemy would have triumphed.
When one does not give in, but rather, as happened here in both cases, gives the order:
"Ready for action!" -- then, this example, in both the Air Force and the navy, shows that
things can also go right on ahead again. You just have to have the nerves for it.

The domestic front

I now come to another aspect of this war, the domestic front. Some of the German
people, namely the older men drafted, are now doing their second four-year world war.
The German people were already very tense <nervous or excited: gespannt>, years
before the war, because of the armaments, the Four Year Plan <?>, the recovery of
Austria <?>, the Sudetenland <?>, and the occupation of Bohemia and Moravia.
<Translator's note: why would they be nervous or tense about Austria or
Sudetenland, for example? Bohemia and Moravia, yes.>

There can be no doubt that hostile propaganda is now streaming and trickling into the
German people from many sides. We are unfortunately unable to screen off hostile
broadcasters entirely, or in any manner worth mentioning. The temptation has grown to
listen to hostile broadcasters, who achieve better psychological effects than we do,
sometimes, unfortunately, very good ones.

As in all cases in which a prohibition or law cannot be given the emphasis of

enforcement by executive authority and punishment, the effect of the prohibition is
harmful to authority; that is true in this case as well. We have, of course, prohibited
listening to hostile broadcasters, but we were not, and are not, able to punish violations
of this prohibition in any meaningful way. Today we pay somewhat more attention to it
to some extent, since, when Mr. Badoglio committed his piece of piggery, when treason
ran amuck in Europe, the result was naturally a wave of defeatism in Germany. Shortly
before, after the air attacks on Hamburg, a mood of crisis prevailed in many cities,
which were, particularly our beloved capital of Berlin, almost panicky for days, until the
mood calmed down and levelled off again.

As a result of listening to foreign broadcasters, talk then circulated through the

channels which always exist, even in a great people, "Oh God, we can no longer win the
war. Wouldn't it be better therefore", etc. etc. Then came this highly interesting remark:
"Ah, a Duce can be arrested, how interesting". When the Duce was arrested I said to
myself, now we've really got to watch it. The people who think that's so interesting, they
interest me.

Since that time, as you may note from the reports from the Reichsministry of Justice,
and you will continue to note over the coming few weeks, Mr. Administrative Advisor
so and so, and Mr. Factory Owner so and so, and Mr. Waiter, and Mr. Chauffeur, and
Mr. Plumber, and Mr. Employee, have all had their pretty little heads cut off and placed
between their feet for damaging the morale of the German people as defeatists, for
disintegrating the powers of resistance of the German people, and for treason. It's really
not important for us to kill anyone. If we really had to shoot as many people as all that,
or as many as I'd have to, it would get increasingly difficult to sign a death sentence.

When I was appointed Reichsminister of the Interior, everybody said (since it's so
awfully easy to say), "Mister, hit hard, stay tough. The German people expect terrible
severity from you". I'm already severe, I don't need any admonitions. It's very easy to
say something like that, but: a death sentence means eternal misery for a whole family;
it means bringing shame on a name which was once honourable. Imagine for a moment
what it will mean to the children and grandchildren of that family, when it is later said
(you must always visualize these things as they will look 10 or 15 years after the war):
"The father of this family was beheaded for high treason during the Great War, which
involved the fate of the germanic nation". (In the distant future, everything we do today
will look heroic. Human weaknesses will then be forgotten. All the cowards will have
died off in the meantime, and in the end everybody will be considered a hero). Such a
family will be shamed for all time. I know all that. I know how hard it is; and I therefore
try to restrict the necessary educational measures.

I know that there's a great deal of theft in Germany, that the concept of private
property has been much weakened by suffering, and by the relaxation of all moral
standards such as always happens in war, or due to a poor upbringing of the German
people in this regard. I can't catch every thief, I'll never catch them all. I don't even want
to catch them all, otherwise I'd have to arrest too many thousands of people. I'll never
catch every defeatist. I'm perfectly well aware that, in one or two years, when the
divisions and regiments withdraw into their garrisons -- some of the older veterans
having been wounded up to 7 or 8 or 9 or 10 times, while the rest no longer march with
us because they lie under the grass; when, I hope, a still decent part of the old SS once
again marches back to Germany, I know that many thousands will applaud us then, and
perhaps feel themselves to have been much more heroic than we were, or -- we don't
think of ourselves as heroic -- more decent than we were.

It will always be like that. I don't mind. We shouldn't mind either. We should never
lose our sense of humour. It is, however, necessary to set an example for the number of
cowards who can be found among every people. It is, God knows, unfortunately true
that these cowards are always found in the upper, rather than the lower or middle, ranks
of a people. Intellect obviously ruins the character in some manner, at least as regards
the formation of will and energy. It's enough for me, for such education, if I always grab
one out of 100 of the defeatists who later cry "hurrah", and lay his head between his
feet. Then the others will shut up for a quarter of a year. Then all the little mommies
will say, "For God's sake, don't get yourself killed, don't make us unhappy. Somebody
we know was recently beheaded. It's in the newspapers. So just keep quiet, cry 'hurrah'
very loud".
 Good, let him; we've achieved our objective. We could never storm a fort or a front
line position with a person like that anyway. We know that anyway. But the main thing
is to keep them from hurting our decent people. Insofar as is necessary, action will be
taken brutally and mercilessly. None of us enjoys that. Although we don't like it, you
must act mercilessly, gentlemen, without regard to family relationships, or
acquaintance, or class, or possible previous earlier service; without regard to whether he
is a party comrade or not, when the fate of the nation so requires. Always go after a big
fish rather than a little one who's stupid and has been fooled. The domestic front will
always be in order if we have the nerve to keep it in order, although it gives us no
pleasure to take action personally.

Foreigners in the Reich

We must be also clear in our minds that we have 6 or 7 million foreigners in Germany.
There may even be 8 million. We have prisoners in Germany. They are not all
dangerous, as long as we strike hard at the smallest minor problem. It's a small matter to
shoot 10 Poles today, instead of maybe having to shoot tens of thousands in their place
later, and compared to the fact that shooting those tens of thousands would also cost
German blood, too. Every little blaze must be immediately stamped out, smothered,
extinguished; otherwise, just as in a real fire, a veritable prairie fire, politically and
psychologically, may break out among the people.

Communists in the Reich

I don't believe that the Communists will try anything, because their leaders, just like
most other criminals in our country, are in concentration camps. Something must be
said here: only after the war will it be seen what a blessing it was for Germany -- all
humanitarian drivel to the contrary notwithstanding -- that we locked this whole
criminal underclass up in the concentration camps -- I'll take care of that myself. If they
were running around loose, it would be much harder for us. Particularly since the
subhumans would then have their subordinate officers and commanders; they'd have
their workers' councils and soldiers' councils. But this way, they're all locked up, and
are making grenades, artillery shells, or other important things, and are very useful
members of human society.

The situation on the enemy side

Now I would like to give a short overview of the other side. We Germans always see-
saw between extremes. Either we are totally exhilarated and applauding enthusiastically,
and we can't wait until we have reached all our objectives in a lightning war of 18, 16,
or even 15 days; or we let our jaws hang down and whine: "Yes, the enemy is
wonderful in everything. The English are doing great. The Russians are doing great;
we're the only ones that aren't". At the same time, we completely forget that, on the
other side, like everywhere else, they can't do the impossible either.

Russia

I would like to list our various enemies quite briefly. Once again, Russia. Here, I can
sum up quite briefly. Russia will, in my opinion, when the next great offensives are
over, have just about exhausted its human potential. One can, of course, draft sixteen
year olds, they can make an early grab at fifteen year olds -- I am absolutely in favour of
us doing the same, if the fate of the nation so requires, since it is better for fifteen years
to die than for the nation to die -- but one cannot continue endlessly in this direction,
since, in the end, with thirteen year olds and twelve year olds one can no longer wage
war. Human potential is, in my view, one of the weakest points of the Russians,
although it was once their greatest strength. In addition, in my conviction,
unprecedented famine now prevails among the Russians, something which can never be
correctly evaluated by us. The front line is, however, still better fed than the people
behind the front. Nevertheless, it is still very bad in many cases even at the front. The
Russian has had great transport difficulties for a long time. These, too, are not yet
overcome. I don't believe that the Russians are weak in a material sense; rather, I
believe that they will die of hunger and loss of blood.

England

England has been waging war for four years now. So far, it has suffered no very great
losses in blood. In England, however, the constant fear -- the very correct fear --
prevails that, when the U boat war sets in again with full force -- and it will do that for
months now, in my view -- the whole equilibrium in food, supplies, and landing
possibilities will fall to pieces. Since all the military operations that England and
America wish to carry out, will stand or fall on tonnage. The landing operations that
they carried out at Salerno doubtlessly cost them half a million tons. I very much doubt
whether England can permit itself many such landing operations over the long term. I
nevertheless believe that England will undertake landing operations, perhaps even this
fall -- they don't have much time left for this -- but certainly early in the year. But there
is another thing I believe: when the war for England -- and this applies even more so for
America later -- really becomes a matter of the blood of their sons, the war in England
and America will be more unpopular that it is already.

America

America is waging a war on two fronts, even more than England: the Pacific war against
Japan, which, fortunately, is a stronger, more warlike ally <than Italy etc.>; and the
war in Europe, or the Atlantic. I do not believe that the conditions in America are for the
best. One must keep in mind that America still has a great number of Jews, and a
brutally plutocratic form of economics. It is hardly conceivable how they push and
shove in America. I believe we were still babes in the woods by comparison in 1918.
The difficulties and misery gradually appearing before the population in America are
furthermore inconceivable. In addition, we have taken Mr. Roosevelt's best electoral
propaganda point -- he will certainly be reelected next year -- away from him through
the liberation of the Duce.

A "show trial" of Mussolini and fascism was in fact intended to be the central point of
his electoral propaganda.

The following applies, however, to both countries: the war will become fearfully
unpopular in England and America the moment England and America have to fight
somewhere in Europe, whether in Italy, the Balkans, or even France, Denmark, or
Norway. This applies especially to America. England fought the last world war using its
own people. America, on the other hand, had, I believe, 60 to 70,000 dead in the World
War. That was, unfortunately, far too few. I am convinced that if the Americans had
suffered 500,000 dead in the World War, they wouldn't have entered the war this time.
It will be a difficult psychological point for those gentlemen when the number of dead
exceeds that of the World War. Once the number reaches the hundred thousand mark or
climbs into the hundreds of thousands, then enormous difficulties will set in for the
Americans. The Americans are in fact by no means as brave as they act. On the
contrary: the American is by no means a brave soldier; he is well armed, he has very
strong artillery, he is well equipped in all things, but he is not a good infantryman.

Political problems on the enemy side

Now come the great political difficulties. England and America are not united. England
says: "America, you must help me more in Europe". Naturally, in doing so, each
swindler wants to cheat the other. Each is seeking to exploit the strength of the other.
America wants England to help defeat Japan. England is trying to exploit the Americans
in order to defeat Germany. England is in a situation which is becoming increasingly
difficult. Mr. Churchill can't hide this from his countrymen. What is England really
fighting for?

And then come the difficulties with Russia. Stalin, a brutal, ice-cold, power politician,
says: "I am bearing the chief brunt of the war. Therefore, I want to have the say in
Europe. Poland, the Balkans, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, are in my spheres of interest.
Germany, when it is defeated, will also be in my sphere of interest". Now they are
starting to have a hard time on the other side. The war with Germany really started
because they gave guarantees to Poland. That's why Mr. Sikorski had to die too, I
believe -- because he clung to this old fairy tale. This naturally caused frightful
difficulties for England. So England has now issued an Atlantic Charter as well. But
England is in even greater need of Russia as an ally. It is, in fact, its strongest ally on
the continent. So while Bolshevik Russia wants to have the say in Europe, England
would dearly like -- as it is so beautifully called - to maintain the "balance of power" in
Europe, and not let the Bolsheviks into Europe, for God's sake.

It is a chaotic jumble of interests and views, of intentions and plans. Each one wants
to exploit and swindle the other for his own plan, and then bring home the harvest for
himself. That is a system which will, of course, hold together for a while, but which will
certainly collapse one day. The moment the alliance collapses, the power of our enemies
will, of course, still be considerable, but not threatening.

The war will be won by the side that continues to hit back, and keeps hitting back,
who never surrenders. For us, the end of the war -- once Russia is exhausted and drops
out one day, and the war becomes a burden for England and America, will bring us
confirmation as a world power <Weltreich>. Because we can really say by comparison
-- though there are problems with every comparison -- that the Seven Years War
brought Prussia's confirmation as a great European power. That war was carried on for
seven years to ensure that the already conquered province of Silesia would remain part
of Prussia. This war will ensure that everything annexed to the German Reich, to
Greater Germany, and then to the Germanic Reich in the years since 1938, will remain
ours. This war is being carried on to keep the path to the East open; so that Germany
may be a world power; to found the Germanic World Empire <Germanische
Weltreich>. That will be the meaning of this war, whether it lasts 5, 6, perhaps even 7
years. We don't know how long it will last. We don't even even ask how long. It will be
carried on by us for as long as it lasts, and it will be carried on with determination and
good humour by us for as long as it lasts. It will be won by the side that stands, that
doesn't give up or give in <umfallen>, even in the most difficult situations. To ensure
that this never happens, is our principal task.

The SS in the war

Now I come to our own development, to the development of the SS over the past few
months. The development was, when I look back over the entire war, unprecedented. It
has gone ahead at a truly astonishing pace. Let's take a look back at the year 1939. Then
we were a couple of regiments, 8 to 9,000 men in police units. We were armed, of
course, but only received our artillery regiment as the heavy branch of service to all
practice purposes two months before the start of the war. Let us recapitulate the tasks,
duties, and missions entrusted to us over the past 4 1/2 years. First, however, I would
like to list and once again describe some still further external changes.

Personnel changes

The following changes have been made in the Main Offices:

The successor to our fallen comrade and friend Heydrich is our comrade SS
Obergruppenfuehrer Kaltenbrunner. He is unfortunately sick today. He has phlebitis,
but it is not, however, dangerous, thank God. That is why he could not come.

Our old friend Daluege has such a serious heart problem that he is taking a cure, and
must now withdraw from active service for 1 1/2 to 2 years. I would like to send a
teletype or telegram this evening to our two friends, namely Daluege and
Kaltenbrunner, on behalf of all of us. We hope that Daluege will be well again and able
to go into action on the front line again in, as I say, approximately 2 years.

On his behalf, SS Obergruppenfuehrer Wuennenberg, who previously led the Police

Division, and was then designated to lead the 4th SS Tank Corps as Commanding
General, who is a General in the Waffen SS and the Police, while heading the Order
Police as Chief of the Order Police.

Gruppenfuehrer Breithaupt, as the Chief of the SS Court, has succeeded our old
comrade and friend, Scharfe of the SS.

SS Obergruppenfuehrer Hofmann has changed posts. He has given up the Race and
Settlement Main Office, and has become the Higher SS and Police Leader Southwest.

SS Gruppenfuehrer Hildebrandt has given up his Upper Section Weichsel and has
become Chief of the Race and Settlement Main Office.

SS Obergruppenfuehrer Schmidt has given up the Personnel Main Office at his own
request, and has entered my personal staff for Special Tasks. His successor is SS
Gruppenfuehrer von Herff.

On of my closest and oldest associates, SS Obergruppenfuehrer Wolff, after a severe

illness which seriously endangered his life (operation for kidney stone) has, thank God,
gotten well again, and is now -- it is the first time anyone has held this position -- the
Highest SS and Police Leader for all of occupied Italy. He is therefore responsible for a
region with 25 to 30 million inhabitants. SS Gruppenfuehrer Globocnik as the Highest
SS and Police Leader for the littoral, as well as several other SS and Police Leaders,
will be subordinate to him. He could not come today.

Higher SS and Police Leaders have since then been assigned as follows: in Croatia,
Kammerhofer, who, at the request of the Croats, is not called Higher SS and Police
Leader there, but rather the Representative of the Reichsfueher SS; this was formerly
Meyszner's title in Serbia; it is now Stroob's title in Greece -- I would like to say right
away that I am reassigning him to Schimana. You will become the Higher SS and
Police Leader in Greece; you will not, therefore, lead the SS Volunteer Division for
Galicia. SS Gruppenfuehrer Hanke will become Higher SS and Police Leader in
Denmark.

The corps and brigades

In the Waffen SS, since we saw each other last, we have progressed to the next stage of
organizational development. At that time, 1 1/2 years ago, we were just forming the 1st
SS Tank Corps led by SS Obergruppenfuehrer Hausser, who is now leading operations
on the Italian littoral.

In the meantime, the following corps have been created or are being formed:
- the 1st SS Tank Corps under SS Gruppenfuehrer Sepp Dietrich, consisting of the SS
Tank Division Leibstandarte SS Adolf Hitler and the SS Tank Division "Hitler Youth",
which is now being formed;

- the 2nd SS Tank Corps under SS Obergruppenfuehrer Hausser, consisting of the SS

Tank Division "Das Reich" and the SS Tank Division "Death's Head";

- the 3rd SS Tank Corps, the germanic one, under SS Gruppenfuehrer Steiner,
consisting of the Tank Division "Viking", now in the East, and of a new unit now being
formed, the SS Volunteer Tank Grenadier Division "Nordland", and the SS Volunteer
Tank Grenadier Brigade "Nederland".

- the 4th SS Tank Corps under SS Gruppenfuehrer Krueger, who previously led the
Division "Das Reich", consisting of two new divisions, namely, the existing SS Tank
Division "Hohenstaufen", which were recruited by SS Obergruppenfuehrer Berger from
the 9th Division, together with the 10th Division, in February of this year, over a period
of 5 to 6 weeks, and trained and formed by SS Obergruppenfuehrer Juettner.

That was a masterpiece, I can tell you, the greatest piece of daring. It was the most
fearful situation that I had seen for several weeks. The old Tank Corps, consisting of the
"Reich", "Leibstandarte", and the "Death's Head", were taken away from France.

In the second half of December came the order from the Fuehrer: on 15.2 two new SS
divisions are to be recruited in France out of the Work Service Camps from youths born
in 1925. You could write a book about it later, and tell the whole story about how
difficult that was, but it was done nevertheless.
 Those recruits were trained with live ammunition from the very first day, since we
never knew whether the English were coming. After 8 weeks, they were already
considerably better, and now they have become magnificently good divisions. At the
moment, we have been ordered to form the 16th and 17th Divisions by January. We are
already mutually occupied with this hard work. The 4th Tank Corps will be formed
from the SS Tank Division "Hohenstaufen" (9th Div.), and a new division is to be
formed, to be called the SS Tank Grenadier Division "Reichsfuehrer SS". It will be
formed from the Brigade "Reichsfuehrer SS" which, we hope, has succeeded in getting
out of Corsica today with the last man;
- the 5th SS Mountain Corps under SS Gruppenfuehrer Phleps, consisting of the SS
Volunteer Mountain Division "Prince Eugene" and a Bosnian Mountain Division (SS
Volunteers b.h. Mountain Division) (Croatia), now being formed;

- the 6th SS Volunteer Corps, the Latvian one, under SS Gruppenfuehrer Pfeffer-
Wildenbruch, consisting of a Latvian brigade formed in the meantime, and which
fought very well on the Volchov (the Latvian SS Volunteer Grenadier Brigade), and a
Latvian unit now being formed and soon to be in full strength (the Latvian SS Volunteer
Infantry Division), among others;

- the 7th SS Tank Corps, which is now being formed, with an already existing SS
Tank Division (10th Division) in France, which has been given the name "Frundsberg",
and the (17th) SS Tank Grenadier Division, which was initially given a next very
strange sounding, but -- when correctly understood -- very defiant name: "Goetz von
Berlichingen". "Frundsberg" and "Goetz von Berlichingen": these names are a
declaration of defiance made by us against our enemies, both domestic and foreign.

In addition, we have formed still more brigades and assault brigades. In the future, when
everything squeezed out of the Waffen SS, and the manner in which the Waffen SS
gave of itself, can finally be described in detail, it will seem a considerable
performance.

Chief of the anti-partisan units

In the meantime, I also created the Office of the Chief of the Anti-Partisan Combat
Units. The Chief of the Anti-Partisan Combat Units is our comrade SS
Obergruppenfuehrer von dem Bach. I considered it necessary that the Reichsfuehrer SS
should be the commanding officer, in keeping with his authority, for all these combats,
since I am convinced that we are in the best position to concern ourselves with the
outspokenly political struggle carried on by our enemy. We've been successful insofar
as the units available to us, and formed by us, weren't repeatedly taken away to plug up
gaps in the front.

It should be noted that the creation of these offices, in the order of division, corps,
army, has led to the next stage, namely, that of Supreme Command of an army or even
of a group, if you want to call it that, for the SS.

Order Police and Security Police

Now briefly on the tasks of the Order Police and Security Police. They have remained
within the same framework. What was achieved, I can only say, is enormous. We have
formed approximately 30 police regiments out of police reservists and former "police
soldiers", or police officials, as they were formerly called. The average age in our police
battalions is no less than in the Security Battalions of the Wehrmacht. The performance
is magnificent, surpassing all praise. We have also formed police regiments by
combining previously formed police battalions of "native peoples". That is, we no
longer left these police battalions by themselves, but we mixed them in a ratio of 1:3.
That is why we have achieved much greater stability with them than with any of the
other domestic or native units, precisely in the present time of crisis.

The tasks of the Security Police, just like those of the Order Police, have grown
together with the expanding geographical territory. It is precisely in this connection that
we will only be able to talk about our accomplishments after the war. It will certainly be
entertaining to be able to speak to our counterparts in the Secret Service and lay our
cards on the table on both sides. Life is not being made easy for us by the other side. At
the same time, you should never forget that the fortunate situation in which we now find
ourselves, in having occupied many parts of Europe, also involves the disadvantage of
having millions of people, and dozens of foreign nationalities, under us, and therefore
against us. Everyone who is a convinced Communist is automatically against us; every
Freemason, every democrat, every convinced Christian, is against us. These are the
ideological enemies opposing us all over Europe, all of whom the enemy has for
himself. Nationalism, correctly or incorrectly understood -- in France, Norway,
Denmark, the Netherlands, or Serbia -- is against us. The enemy can therefore exploit
this ground, which has been magnificently well prepared for him, for his acts of
sabotage and parachute activities at any time.

We didn't have these problems until now, except in the Caucausus and in Iran, which
is very far away.

Our dear English and American adversaries are already on the continent. They have
southern Italy, we have northern Italy. Now we'll see some fireworks. I'm glad of it. It
will be a wonderful opportunity for us to show what we are capable of in this area. It
will be our first chance to meet the English in this field with the same weapons for once.
The only foreign people the English have under them are the Irish. The Irish, however,
are so Catholic, and so preoccupied with religion, that despite their national hostility to
England they are kept calm, neutralized by the Church, so that we cannot use them. An
opportunity is now appearing for the first time. You can be sure we will not fail it to
make use of it.

Tasks as Reichsministers of the Interior

In addition to all everything else we've achieved in this time, I can not keep silent about
the fact that I have become Reichsminister of the Interior. I have a little bit more work. I
view my responsibilities as falling into the following general groups:

1. - restoration of the authority of the Reich, which has, to a great extent, been lost;

2. - decentralization of tasks not of importance to the Reich. To keep the Reich in

hand, while calling upon all the creative powers slumbering in the German
 people under German self-government;

3. - radical elimination of corruption or misconduct throughout this entire

apparatus and in every case. I will proceed ruthlessly. If somebody has done
something wrong and if I catch him, he's coming before the Khadi <judge>, big
or little, since such a case, exorcised and carried out in public, does not harm
respect for the state and party, but strengthens it, because then everybody says:
"All kinds of respect. Decent. If somebody's a rascal, throw him out". That
applies just as much to us within the SS. I am now coming to a few things
which, as is my custom, I will state clearly. It is quite clear that human
shortcomings are found everywhere. Organizations distinguish themselves only
through the following: one organization conceals them and thinks it has to cover
them up with the famous blanket of Christian brotherly love, so as not to hurt its
prestige. Another organization cleanses itself brutally. It says, "He was a swine,
we've shot him", or "We've locked him up", or, in any case, "We threw him out".

Then it says, <page misnumbered; sentence follows without interruption> "Now,

get busy and blabber about it or do something else." That gives it the right to say: "If
anybody else among you is a swine, then he's going to get the same". As Reichsfuehrer
SS, as Chief of the German Police, and now as Reichsminister of the Interior, I would
have no moral right to proceed against any racial comrade, nor could we bring forth the
strength to do so, if we did not take care to cleanse our own own ranks brutally. You
can be sure that I will do this as Reichsminister of the Interior. You can also be sure that
I will not go off at a madman's clip, and then maybe pull the bridle so hard that the nag
falls down on his hindquarters; rather, the bit will be pulled slowly and gradually, so the
horse will be brought to a decent pace again.

SS - economic operations

I'm now coming to a few other great individual areas of responsibility, which you must
all know something about. We have gigantic armaments industries in the concentration
camps. That is the responsibility of our friend SS Group Leader Pohl. We put in many
millions of manhours on armaments each month. We tackle the most ungrateful
problems, and I must admit that whether it's in Pohl's concentration camps or his
economic operations, whether outside among the Higher SS and Police Leaders or in
the factories of the SS Administrative Main Office, one thing is obvious: we are SS men
wherever we are. If something is in a bad way, get right down to it. Educate every
subordinate in this direction for me. We want to help without being hindered by
jurisdiction, since, after all, we want to win the war. Whatever we do, after all, we're
doing for Germany. Whether it involves the building of a street or tunnel isn't going
ahead somewhere; whether it's an invention which can't come into existence due to
sheer bureaucracy, or whether it's something else: wherever we can lend a hand, we're
going to do it. Whatever we achieve in our armaments factories will be a considerable
accomplishment, one which is worth seeing, even if we can only describe and estimate
it at the end of the war.

The evacuation of the Jews

I want to mention another very difficult matter here before you in all frankness. Among
ourselves, it ought to be spoken of quite openly for once; yet we shall never speak of it
in public. Just as little as we hesitated to do our duty as ordered on 30 June 1934, and
place comrades who had failed against the wall and shoot them, just as little did we ever
speak of it, and we shall never speak of it. It was a matter of course, of tact, for us,
thank God, never to speak of it, never to talk of it. It made everybody shudder; yet
everyone was clear in his mind that he would do it again if ordered to do so, and if it
was necessary.

I am thinking now of the evacuation of the Jews, the extirpation <Ausrottung> of the
Jewish people. It is one of those things that's easy to say: "The Jewish people will be
extirpated" <wird ausgerottet>, says every Party comrade, "that's quite clear, it's in our
programme: elimination <Ausschaltung> of the Jews, extirpation <Ausrottung>; that's
what we're doing." And then they all come along, these 80 million good Germans, and
every one of them has his decent Jew. Of course, it's quite clear that the others are pigs,
but this one is one first-class Jew. Of all those who speak this way, not one has looked
on; not one has lived through it. Most of you know what it means when 100 bodies lie
together, when 500 lie there, or if 1,000 lie there. To have gone through this, and at the
same time, apart from exceptions caused by human weaknesses, to have remained
decent, that has made us hard. This is a chapter of glory in our history which has never
been written, and which never shall be written; since we know how hard it would be for
us if we still had the Jews, as secret saboteurs, agitators, and slander-mongers, among us
now, in every city -- during the bombing raids, with the suffering and deprivations of
the war. We would probably already be in the same situation as in 1916/17 if we still
had the Jews in the body of the German people.

The riches they had, we've taken away from them. I have given a strict order, which
SS Group Leader Pohl has carried out, that these riches shall, of course, be diverted to
the Reich without exception. We have taken none of it. Individuals who failed were
punished according to an order given by me at the beginning, which threatened: he who
takes even one mark of it, that's his death. A number of SS men -- not very many -- have
violated that order, and that will be their death, without mercy. We had the moral right,
we had the duty to our own people, to kill this people which wanted to kill us <dieses
Volk, dass uns umbringen wollte, umzubringen: translator's note: it is unclear
whether the writer is referring to the Jews as a race, or to the Jews as saboteurs,
agitators, and slander-mongerers; see above>. But we don't have the right to enrich
ourselves even with one fur, one watch, one mark, one cigarette, or anything else. Just
because we eradicated <ausgerottet> a bacillus, after all, doesn't mean we want to be
infected by the bacillus and die. I will never permit even one little spot of corruption to
arise or become established here. Wherever it may form, we shall burn it out together.
In general, however, we can say that we have carried out this most difficult task out of
love for our own people. And we have suffered no harm to our inner self, our soul, our
character in so doing.

The attitude of the SS man

In describing what we have done in this one year, in a -- I would almost like to say --
statement of accounts, for all of us, and before us all, there is one thing I must neither
overlook nor neglect: the significance of the SS Man's attitude. Here, I believe, we have
endured decently, generally and on the whole, as in all other things as well. The attitude
of our brave leaders and men was proper in desperate situations at the front, where they,
in the darkest hours, in the very darkest hours, grew out beyond themselves, in life and
in death, in this heroic great death, which has continued over the last 10 weeks. The
attitude of our men was, generally and as a whole, good throughout the partisan war,
even in the remotest areas. Their attitude was also good in the homeland.

Because my attitude is more important than what I say. The people, the little man, in
the misery of his heart and with fear in the pit of his stomach, is already looking at our
attitude in many cases today, asking: "How does the SS Man stand? What's his facial
expression? Does he look miserable? Does he let his jaw sag?" Or: "How does this SS
batallion march to the front?" Or: "How did the police guard act during the scuffles in
the Balkans or in Russia? Or: "How does the SS man act during an air raid? Does he
stick around, or does he take to his heels? Is he the one who prevents a panic and helps
dig people out?" Or contrariwise: "Is there an SS Leader or SS Man who claims special
rights, who travels by car where he isn't entitled, who lives better than other people,
who does no extra duty and takes every Sunday off, whose wife makes endless
demands, who gets herself in a twist and won't do this and won't do that, and makes
unreasonable demands while others are being bombed?" Or are our wives the hardest-
working, the most modest, the bravest, those who never criticize, who hold their heads
high at all times?

In general and as a whole, our attitude was good. There is still room for improvement
in our ranks. To say this is part of the duty of a Commander or Group Leader. I would
like to head this chapter "We, Ourselves".

The principle of selection

We have arisen through the law of selection. We have selected from the average of our
people. Our people arose through the dice game of Fate and history in long primaeval
times, over generations and centuries. Foreign peoples swept over this people and left
their hereditary material in them. Channels of foreign blood flowed into this people; yet
this people has nevertheless, through horrifying misery and frightful blows of fate, still
had, in their blood vessels, the strength to endure.

Thus, this entire people has been drenched in, and is held together by, Nordic-
Faelisch-<?>-Germanic blood; so that in the end one could, and still can, continue to
speak of a German people. Out of this people, the result of diverse mixtures of
hereditary factors, such as was available after the collapse which followed the years of
the struggle for freedom, we have now consciously attempted to select the northern
Germanic blood, since we could assume that this part of the blood was the bearer of the
creative and heroic, of the life-maintaining qualities of our people. We examined the
outward appearance on the one hand, and then revised that outward appearance in terms
of new requirements on the other hand, through more and more samples, both physical
and intellectual, both of character and soul.

We repeatedly sought out and rejected that which was not suitable, that which did not
adapt to us. As long as we possess the strength to do so, this Order will remain healthy.
The moment we forget the law of the racial foundation of our people, the law of
selection and severity with regards to ourselves, then the germ of death will lie within
us; in that moment we will perish, just as every human organization, every prime of life
in this world, comes to an end at last. To enable this flourishing and bearing of fruit to
continue for as long and as blessedly as possible, and -- don't be alarmed -- for as many
thousands of years as possible, must be our aspiration and our inner law. For that
reason, it is our duty, whenever we meet and whatever we do, to remember our
principle: blood, selection, severity. The law of nature is precisely this: what is hard, is
good; what is strong, is good; that which endures out of the struggle for existence, both
physically and in terms of will and soul, is good -- always viewed from the vantage
point of time.

Naturally, somebody can rise to the top for a while -- this has often happened in
history -- through swindling and cheating. For nature, for the fate of the earth, for the
fate of the world, that doesn't matter. Reality, that is, nature, fate, purges the swindler
after a time -- not viewed in the ages of men, but in the ages of the world. Never to
deceive ourselves, but rather to remain genuine at all times, that must always be our
endeavour; that is what we must advocate and inculcate in ourselves, in every young
man, and in every one of our subordinates, over and over again.

The SS after the war

One thing must be clear, one thing I would like to say to you again today: the true
forging together of our Order, this Order which we built up over ten long years, the
fundamental principles of which we founded ten years before the war, and in which it
was educated, will only begin when the war is over. That will still remain to be
accomplished by us -- if I may say so, we, the old fighters -- in twenty exhausting years
of hard work after the end of the war, to create a tradition of 30, 35, 45 years, that is, a
generation. This Order will then march into the future, young and strong, revolutionary
and effective, to fulfil its task of providing the germanic people with a superior stock
<Oberschicht> capable of binding this germanic people and this Europe together and
holding them together, producing the intellects that required by the people, in
economics, farming, politics, and as soldiers, statesmen, and technicians. In addition,
this superior stock must be so strong, so filled with life, that each generation will be
capable, without question, of sacrificing two or three sons from each family on the
battlefield, yet nevertheless ensure the passing on of the bloodline.

The virtues of the SS man

I now wish to speak of the most important virtues which I began to preach and to
inculcate in this Order, in the entire Allgemeine SS -- since that is the basis of the Order
-- years ago, and which are of such decisive meaning and importance now, precisely in
the 5th year of the war.

1. Loyalty

So far, thank God, no case has occurred in our ranks in which a reputable SS Man was
disloyal. Let one thing be the guideline here: should anyone in your circle of comrades
ever be disloyal to the Fuehrer or the Reich, even if only in thought, you must ensure
that he is expelled from the Order, and we will ensure that he is expelled from life.
Since everything, I already said this and I'll repeat it once again today, everything can
be pardoned in this world, but there is one thing which cannot be pardoned among
germanic people, and that is disloyalty. It would be unpardonable, and it is
unpardonable. Cases like the Badoglio affair in Italy should, and never will, happen in
Germany. The name Badoglio will in the future be a term of abuse for bad dogs, for
four-legged mongrel curs, just as in ancient times Thersites was a term of abuse for
traitors. We can only say one thing, and say it again and again: let the German people,
every one of its men and every one of its women, prove, through unprecedented,
unconditional loyalty, that this German people is worthy of living in the era of an Adolf
Hitler, for which people the Fuehrer arose and dedicated his life, filled with care, filled
with responsibility, and filled with work for our germanic German people.

2) Obedience

Obedience is required and given in the soldier's life, morning, noon, and night. The little
man always obeys, or almost always. If he doesn't, he's locked up. The question of
obedience among the bearers of higher honours in the State, party, and army, and even
here and there in the SS, is more difficult. I would like to state something here clearly
and unequivocally: that the little man must obey is a matter of course. It is even more a
matter of course that all SS high-ranking SS Leaders, that is, the entire Group
Leadership Corps, should be a model of unconditional obedience.

If anybody believes that a command is based on mistaken perceptions on the part of a

superior or on mistaken information, it is a matter of course, that he -- that is, every one
of you -- has the duty and the responsibility to speak out, stating his reasons manfully
and truthfully, if he is convinced that they mitigate against the command. But once the
superior or Reichsfuehrer SS involved -- in most cases, it the Group Leadership Corps
which is concerned -- or, even, the Fuehrer, has decided and has given an order, it must
be carried out, not just to the letter and to the text, but in keeping with the intent.
Whoever carries out the order must do so as a loyal trustee, as the true representative of
the authority giving the order.

If you ever believe that an order is mistaken or even wrong, then there are two
possibilities: if you don't believe that you can take responsibility for an order, then you
must state honestly: "I cannot take responsibility for it, I wish to be discharged from
carrying out the order". In most cases, you will be ordered to carry it out anyway. Either
that, or your superior will think: "His nerves are shot, he's weak". Then he might say,
"OK, you can retire from service".

But orders are holy. If the generals obey, then the army will obey, too, as a matter of
course. The holiness of an order becomes more and more important with the increasing
size of our territory. To enforce an order in our little Germany isn't at all difficult. To
carry out an order when we have garrisons on the Urals -- as we will have one day, of
that I am convinced -- that will be a good deal harder. In this case, it will not always be
possible to verify that the order has been carried out. Verification, among us, must not
and never will consist of enforcement by a commissar, as in Russia. The only
commissar we have must be our own conscience, our faithfulness to duty, loyalty,
obedience. If you set this example, gentlemen, then every subordinate will follow your
example. But you will never be able to demand obedience if you do not first show the
same obedience to authority yourselves, unconditionally and without restriction.

3) Bravery
I don't think there is much need for admonitions on bravery among us, since our Fuehrer
is brave, and our men are brave. For curiosity's sake, however, I would like to give you
a contrasting example: an example of how things are done among the Russians; I would
also like to express a few thoughts in this regard. I heard the following story from an
Estonian officer who was incorporated into the Red Army with his Estonian company,
but who succeeded in escaping: a unit of the Red Army carried out an attack which was
repulsed by the Germans. Afterwards, the unit commissar ordered the officers to a
conference. The officers had had to report to the dugout, in a prescribed manner, that is,
at attention. The commissar kept on working quietly and let the officers stand at
attention for a long time. When one became restless and began to fidget, the commissar
just looked up and said, "You seem quite tired". Then he asked, "Does anyone of the
gentlemen have anything to say about the attack?" One officer replied that the German
resistance was too strong, that attack at this position was impossible. The commissar
drew his pistol, shot the officer, and then simply asked, "Does anyone else have any
comments"? Half an hour later, they carried out another attack.

Look, that's an example of the kind of bravery we don't want, and that we don't need.
The "commissar" ordering us to attack must be our own bravery, our own loyalty, our
own obedience. There is an enormous difference.

In our ranks, we live according to our germanic laws, one of which, a really beautiful
one, says, "Honour is compulsion enough." With foreign peoples, we must apply Asiatic
laws. We must never lose sight of that. If we have one of our blood before us, a
Norwegian or Dutchman of good racial stock, then we can only win his heart over to us
according to our, that means his and our, totally germanic laws. With a Russian or Slav,
from a racial point of view, we should never even try to apply our holy laws to them,
but rather the tried and tested laws of the Russian commissar.

I would like to bring up another issue here, which is part of the topic of bravery. I
mean civil courage, which is sometimes not quite as it should be. I know really a lot of
my best SS leaders, who would storm any bunker, any fort, unconsciously,
automatically, without thinking about it, but who, if they had to demote a subordinate,
for example -- I think I already mentioned this earlier in my remarks -- they do this for
me to see; but then when the time for enforcement comes, they act like astonished
Central Europeans and say, "Quite incomprehensible, my dear fellow. Dreadfully sorry.
I'll have to speak to Berlin about it right away. Another piece of piggery from the Main
Staff Office. Of course, in Berlin, it's all theory..." It would be better to have civil
courage beforehand, and say, "You, you're demoted, get out". No, gentlemen, it doesn't
work like that. In the future -- I think I already said this once -- I'll have to send all such
people back to the commander involved and say: "Ah, that was your mistake; the
demotion was an error. Now you get your valuable employee back again". This is, in
fact, an element of bravery, so-called civil courage. And I would like to educate my
leadership corps in it where it is lacking.

Part of bravery also consists of faith, and here, my Group Leaders, we won't be
outdone by anyone in the world. Faith wins battles, faith gets victories. We don't want
men in our ranks who are pessimistic, who've lost their faith. It doesn't make any
difference what his job is, whether he's a member of the General SS, in economic life, in
a government position, somewhere in the Waffen SS, on the front (that doesn't usually
happen), or whether he's on staff at the front, or somewhere else in the communications
zone, in the homeland, in the police, or in the Security Police or Order Police. People
who are so weak that they've lost their faith will be rejected by us, we don't want them.
He who has lost the strength to believe shall not live among us in our ranks.

4. Truthfulness

I come now to a fourth virtue, which is very rare in Germany, truthfulness. One of the
greatest evils, one which has become widespread in the war, is untruthfulness in
communications, reports, and data sent by subordinate positions in civilian life, in the
state, party, and army, to superior positions. The communication, the report, is the basis
for every decision. It is really true, that, in the war, one can now assume in many sectors
that 95 % of all reports are lies, or only half-truths, or are only half-correct.

This begins with troop strength reports. I'll take an everyday example. If somebody is
asking for reinforcements, he gives his "fighting strength" as his "troop strength". If he's
even cleverer, he'll give the "trench strength". Of course, that's even less: "I have only
200 men left". Frightful! Only 200 men.

If anybody is sly enough to say, "What's your supply strength?" he'll see that there are
1300 men eating in the regiment concerned. I must say: these are remarkable ratios.
Very odd. 200 men are fighting, while 1100 men are the huge tail wagging behind this
little head. How peculiar.

If somebody wants weapons, on the other hand, he says, "I have a troop strength of
3,000 men, but not nearly enough weapons. I need vehicles and weapons".

If somebody needs material, mines or anti-tank cannons, for his positions, then the
position becomes 25, 30, 35 kilometres long. It stretches out like a rubber band. But if
he's supposed to occupy it and somebody says, "Your division is so strong, you could
occupy at least 25 kilometres", then the division shrinks, and suddenly he says, "I can
only occupy 7 kilometres".

Then there are the famous communications "on military grounds". It used to be that
when somebody closed a Jewish company or took away a Jew, a Mr. Paymaster So and
So reported, "What, do you want to impair the defensive strength of the German
people? You're sabotaging the war effort". In reality, the Jew bought off the paymaster
with a fur coat. Today, if we take 800 Jewish women away from a company, along
comes a gentleman and says -- so as not to insult him, let's call him by a title which
doesn't even exist -- Mr. "War Advisor", who's just had a pair of brand new boots made
by the company, and he says, "I must report that you have seriously harmed war
production".

Or: sometimes, when I see proposals for promotions and decorations, there's no
activity anywhere which isn't decisive to the war effort. It's astonishing. Look here. I
believe, if we want to be able to look each other in the eye, we must succeed in
obtaining absolute and unrestricted honesty. Otherwise, management becomes
impossible. Nothing can be managed if, for example, every Higher SS and Police
Leader, and every division and corps commander, conceals 500 or 1000 men from us. If
17 divisions each have 1000 men too many today, then the German people are being
deprived of a division. If every division has just 300 trucks too many per division, then
two divisions could be motorized out of the surplus. These are things we can't be
responsible for.

I now come to another matter on the subject of truthfulness. In both war and peace, it
must be so -- and this will be a particular object of education in peacetime -- that we SS
men no longer need to make written contracts; but rather, among us, just as in former
times, a man's word and handshake must be equivalent to a contract; an SS Man's
handshake, if necessary, must be of greater value than a surety for one million or more.
The handshake or given word of an SS man, if necessary, must be proverbially safer
than a mortgage on the most valuable property of another man. It must be so!

If we make contracts, we must keep them. If I make a contract with an agent, even if
he is a contemptible character, then I keep the deal. I stand for this attitude without
condition. When I decree that anybody in the General Gouvernement who informs on a
Jew concealed in some hideout gets one third of the Jew's fortune, it often later happens
that a Secretary Hueber or an Unterstuermfuehrer Hueber, a person who -- if he can get
away with it -- indulges in unauthorized private travel, who orders anything from a new
pencil to a new telephone, that is, somebody who never saves, suddenly starts to save
for the German Reich. He says for example, "The Jew has 12,000 RM. Why should I
give 4,000 RM to the Pole who turned him in? No, I'll save the money for Germany.
The Pole gets 400 RM". In this manner, a subordinate goes off on his own bat and
breaks the word of a whole organization. These are things that must be impossible.

If we give our word, it must be kept. If the Reichsfuehrer promises somebody

protection for his organization -- as is often the case in the Balkans -- then this promise
must be kept. We, precisely we of the SS, must earn a reputation for contractual loyalty
all over the world such as to gain the greatest value for Germany in so doing, that is,
faith through trust. Many people will then come to us who won't go to official agencies.
There's always a lot of confusion in the Balkans. That's really our big advantage. If they
were united, it would be terrible. There's confusion in the Caucasus, there's confusion in
Russia. We can only -- and that's only part of the lesson -- take constant care that the
territories occupied by us, and the peoples governed by us, never unite, that they remain
disunited at all times: if they united, they would, of course, only be against us. So if we
promise protection to a splinter group which comes to us, then it must be out of the
question for any member of the SS or the police, that is, the Order as a whole, to go and
break our given word. Our word must be holy.

Justice! Gentlemen, it is always very important to me that justice must never be to the
letter alone, but unrestricted justice, in terms of intent, not words or form. At the same
time, I'm coming to a matter which is not quite right among us. To our sorrow, as you
know, many regrettable legal matters come before me in legal cases. I have every
judgement against a SS Leader or police officer laid before me, and sometimes I note
the manner in which my officers judge each other, time after time. You know the
proverb of the crow that tried to cover itself with another bird's feathers...

It's such a habit for an officer not to hurt another officer. Gentlemen, Germany could
learn from the old Prussian army in this regard. An organization remains healthy as long
as it feels an unwavering pressure, an irresistible drive, to keep itself clean. A corps
must be trained and educated to say to someone who has done something wrong "You
must turn yourself in". Or, if it's more serious: "You must be punished for the sake of
justice. You don't belong here in our ranks, or at least not in your present position in our
ranks. It's wartime; you can go off and clear your name by serving as a common enlisted
man and rise up through the ranks again. But you don't belong in our ranks in your
present position". Now, instead of this impulse -- one cannot really call it by any other
name -- to cleanse one's own ranks, as was still the custom in the old army under
Wilhelm I, an impulse to act like a bunch of lawyers has spread throughout all
organizations in Germany. There's no more talk of cleansing, expelling, purging
anyone; rather, everybody is somebody or other's else's lawyer; it's like a trade union.
Everybody acts on the principle of: "Well, you never know, you might do something
wrong yourself one day. So just be careful! If you cover up for him, he'll cover up for
you".

It's a great setup. You can falsify history like that for a while, gentlemen; you can
manipulate your way upwards like a con-man. But one day, when tough times come
along and there's pressure from Fate, then an organization like that collapses because of
it. So I want you as judges, and you as High Leadership Corps of the SS, to ensure that
such things are no longer covered up. If a little man and a big man are on trial or
involved in some legal matter, I don't want to see the little man get punished and then
hear people say of the big man, "He was only marginally involved". Of course, the
officer is only marginally involved. In a case like that, you should say, "You have the
higher rank, therefore you have the greater insight. Consequently, you must be more
strictly and severely punished". It's the little man who is marginally involved. If he
hadn't had his superior's example, he wouldn't have done it.

There's another thing I want. I want clear responsibility. That's another element of
truthfulness. I always feel sick when I ask "Who decided that?" and I get an answer like,
"Oh, the So and So Ministry Main Office". So I say, "OK; and who, pray tell, is Mr.
Ministry?" That's what I want to know. I was born that way, I've got great curiosity. I
want to know which Untersturmfuehrer, Obersturmfueher, Hauptsturmfuehrer,
Sturmbannfuehrer was it? Who was it in the Main Office? Was it Mr. Meyer, or Mr.
Huber? Who made the decision?

Of course, a lot of people say, "I've got a great boss, my Main Office boss or my
Higher SS and Police Leader is a real good man. Since he's so decent, he always covers
up for his subordinates". And since all these little wretches look so tremendously brave
behind their superior's back, they say, "The Old Man will look out for us, he'll go off
like a big tiger and fight for us before the Reichsfuehrer". So I no longer want to read
that the "So and So Main Office So and So has decided"; rather, gentlemen, I want to
know whether it was Mr. Sturmbannfuehrer Meyer or Lehmann. If the decision was
correct, then he can only be proud not to be just a government employee someplace in
the background.

We don't want to see just the big ones covering themselves in glory. The little man
should get some glory, too. Besides, there's also a really positive side too. You and me,
we'll sometimes become alert to someone who never attracted any attention at all, who
has never even been noticed for all his hard work, and we'll be able to say: "Damn! That
was really a great job! The report is concise, but it means something. That man must
have eyes like a hawk. I'll have to take a closer look at him". We'll discover a lot of
good brains in our ranks this way; we'll be glad to have opened the way for somebody
with talent, maybe sometimes even a genius.
 If a decision is wrong, though, then I don't want the top-ranking commandant to cover
up a piece of nonsense out of sheer frivolity and maybe fight a battle to the death with
his comrade from another Main Office or Upper Division, just because he says: "It's our
jurisdiction. That the decision is nonsense, makes no difference. If it was my Main
Office that made the mistake, then it has to be defended".

I also want us to act correctly with regards to other offices, gentlemen. I believe that I
can say of myself that when I go ahead, I set a good example. If I'm wrong, I say so, I'm
wrong. My God, our authority can't be so small-minded that we can't admit that. We all
have so damn much work to do, that out of one hundred decisions a certain percentage
of wrong, badly thought out, or half-baked decisions must be made. That's human. I'd
rather have the work get done, and the decisions be made; rather than one man making
five perfectly correct decisions, I'd rather have somebody else make one hundred
decisions in the same period of time, of which five may be wrong; since the other 95 are
still correct. Since mistakes may be made, I admit them; I don't defend nonsense "for
the sake of Germany".

You say: "Yes, we made a mistake. That will be improved or corrected, without any
loss of our prestige". That's how it's got to be with us; and we want to go ahead and set a
good example. I've also given orders to this effect in the Ministry. The individual should
stand forward by name; we're not a joint-stock company. Because of the Jews, it
became a habit with us to do all business in the form of joint-stock companies; but
nobody knew who the joint-stock company was, or which Jew was "Mr. Ltd." or "Mr.
Inc.". I don't want a "Mr. Ministry", but I do want administrative advisors, secretaries,
etc., and, among us, I want SS Leaders, Untersturmfuehers, or Obersturmfuehrers, or
maybe even a Standartenfuehrer, if he's clever enough. But I want to know them all by
name. So let's all start doing that. We want to eliminate anonymity, and substitute clear
responsibility. Whatever I do, I am responsible for it: we must educate even the lowest-
ranking Unterscharfuehrer to this, but we must start with the higher leadership.

5) Honesty

I now come to a fifth point: sanctity of property, honesty, sincerity. I must say that these
things have gotten very murky in Germany; we have become -- if I say this now in a
closed room, it's because it's only intended for this small group of people -- a very
corrupt people. We should not, and need not, however -- I want to mention this -- take it
so tragically, so pessimistically. Many people say, "Oh, the Finns are an honest people".
Yes sir. Do you know why they're so honest? Not because they've got simply fantastic
moral inclinations, but because they had laws for 300 years, that anybody who stole one
Finnish mark should have his hand hacked off. And that was so painful and so
distressing that the whole people, as a result of such measures and such education,
gradually became honest. We're not going to start doing that here, but, gentlemen, we
must always take care to begin with ourselves. We will never succeed in bringing the
pestilence called corruption under control, not even within our own ranks -- it's not so
bad yet -- unless we persecute all signs of incipient corruption in our ranks without
exception and without restriction, without asking "Who is it?", and without saying
"But... but...". We must persecute them with barbarous severity, demoting all corrupt
men, depriving them of office and decorations, and exposing them before their
subordinates.
 At the same time, that which really deserves the name of corruption is not so bad in
our ranks. There are, however, little things that nobody notices any more and which are
now called "getting something organized". For example, a family lives in the East.
They've got more than enough workers already. They grab this Russian, that Russian,
maybe a Russian girl. That's terrific, really magnificent. The missus doesn't have to do
anything any more, she no longer cooks or beats carpets. What for? We're a master race.
Nobody asks who pays for these workers; they'd be better utilized in an armaments
factory. For a while, at first, before Obergruppenfuehrer Pohl got them -- Eicke had
already gone into front line service -- this was true even in the concentration camps, due
to the confused relationships of authority. A lot of families had a prisoner here, and a
prisoner there; other families even got all new furniture and I don't know what all else.
We've still got old cases pending, and we're going to clear these old cases up, right
down to the last detail, without mercy. Because it's stealing to claim workers to which
one is not entitled, when the work isn't really a necessity of life. 100 men used solely on
the grounds of comfort in such work today, are a loss for German armaments.

In addition to what I've already said, however, confusion arises with regard to this
question because of the misery in which we have been living since 1936-1937 <?>.
Since that time, we no longer have all the necessary consumer goods which the human
heart desires, and which we would like to have, such as silk, stockings, chocolate, or
coffee. Hazy conditions are the result. We don't want to be hangmen here. There's a lot
of temptation: can you buy it, can't you, maybe you can get it in France, or Belgium, or
someplace else if you pay extra. These are things which make education difficult, of
course. So I'm not concerning myself with all these moot questions which many people
take for granted in this epoch of misery. I'm simply saying today that that the strictest
conceivable standards will be established for the SS the moment normal conditions are
restored after the war. If we do that for 20 years in peacetime, we'll achieve a faultless
attitude on all these matters in the future through education.

I'd like to mention one more thing. To me, it's obvious that the old fighters, the longer
they have fought for the movement, the greater is their duty to act decently in all things.
When somebody comes to me and says, "But he's an old fighter", then I must answer,
"Mister, please excuse me, but did we really fight for the Third Reich just so we could
wreck <totschlagen> it ourselves, destroying <umbringen> through violence the
respect that the people once had for us?"

It is precisely the old Nazi who, when he slips, must be caught and punished; who, in
really serious cases, must pay with his life. We can take no account of past service. If
we punish him, and the others talk about it, we save 99 others. But if we look the other
way, saying, "He's an old Nazi", "He's an old SS Leader, you can't sentence leaders",
then the next 99 will be guilty in the same case, and the whole organization will
gradually suffocate because of it.

6) Comradeship

The word "comradeship" is used with great frequency. Comradeship is generally quite
good among us, especially among the front line troops. I would, however, since I am
speaking of comradeship, like to all one thing: avoid any disputes amongst yourselves.
Disputes are unproductive.
 Differences of opinion are productive, if they are managed factually. Disputes,
rancour, anger, and backbiting are unproductive, and paralyse the strength which we
owe the Fatherland. They cost nervous energy which we need for other things, namely,
for the fulfillment of our duties.

I must perhaps make another request, that disputes between higher leaders not be
carried out at my expense. In many cases, the Reichsfuehrer has to play postman, since
the two gentlemen are no longer speaking to each other. So one of them writes a letter to
the Reichsfuehrer SS, then the other one writes a letter, too. Then the Reichsfuehrer has
to write to both of them, and so on. It would save stamps, and be much simpler, it would
save us all time, if the gentlemen would write to each other, and sit down together for
once. In most cases, almost all cases, it turns out that if they speak their mind, if they
take the time to discuss it, the matter is settled. If they don't take the time for it, if one
says, "I don't have time, I can't see him this afternoon, besides, we can't agree on
whether he visits me or I visit him, let's meet someplace neutral, the best thing is to
meet by an old oak tree, or something like that". If they can't reach an agreement like
that, since these are all matters of prestige -- a man has his prestige after all, especially
when his person is involved -- then they can never even discuss the matter.

But then they write letters to each other for weeks and weeks, months and years, just
to get mad every time and wait for the other man to do something. Then some little
wretch comes along and says, "I've got a real great number with my Old Man, if I tell
him the other guy was naughty again, he'll say: he's representing my interests, he's a
good Unterstuermfuehrer, he's in the right."

I'd like to tell you something: beware of such subordinates, beware of such
companions. Let us all beware of men who kindle disputes and don't advise
reconciliation between German people. Everybody who decorates himself with cheap
laurels in this manner, as especially brave representatives of their Ministry, their
section, their division, would best be removed from office immediately for encouraging
quarrelsomeness and character defects. These are things -- I would like to draw your
attention to this -- that we want to eradicate <ausmerzen> from our entire Leadership
Corps.

7) Responsibility

I have already briefly spoken on the subject of willingness to take responsibility.

Situations will arise in this war requiring tremendous willingness to take responsibility.
At this point, I'm not thinking of what I said before, that responsibility must be clearly
stated, that the individual must stand up and be counted instead of remaining
anonymous; rather, I am now thinking of another kind of responsibility, namely, a
willingness to take responsibility even when, gentlemen, it really has nothing to do with
you. I would like to say something here about the famous matter of jurisdiction. Our
friend Obergruppenfuehrer Wolff, in Italy, has just introduced something in the local
Italian office: he said, "The man with jurisdiction is the man who can get it done."
That's really true. In particular, there are men who say, "Of course, I'm responsible for
that, but I can't get along with the person I have to deal with, he doesn't like me, he turns
me down. So I'd rather see that nothing gets done in this matter."
 Somebody else who isn't competent, of course, could certainly get something done,
because he's friends with the man on the other end. But he's not allowed to negotiate.
The man with the authority would rather do nothing for the SS than see something get
done by somebody who doesn't have the authority. I think you understand what I mean.
Look, we must be generous here, right up to the hilt. The main thing is, something's got
to be done. It's the same thing in battle: if an important hill has to be taken, it doesn't
matter whether the 995th Division or the 998th has authority to do it. The main thing is,
it has to be taken; then afterwards, they can always say, "OK, it's in your sector now; of
course, we took it, but please be so kind as to occupy and hold it; don't let it be taken
away again, or else we'll have to take it again".

That which must be accomplished for Germany and for the SS must be accomplished
by the person who is able to do it, whoever can get it done, and that person must possess
an uttermost love of responsibility.

8) Hard work

I would like to say another word about hard work. Lets teach all our men, today during
the war and later in peacetime, that no work is undignified. It often happens that, as
soon as one becomes, let's say, an Unterscharfuehrer, of course, he can't carry suitcases
any more, he can't do this and he can't do that any more. He can only stand around and
supervise. That's the way it is now.

For example, if a leader goes out with his wife, of course, he can't carry a package in
uniform; it's better to let his wife do it. It's almost like in the Orient with us. Maybe we
should make it a law that the wife with the package should also walk three steps behind.
These attitudes have already become really traditional, and I don't want to see them
adopted by us. I would like us to issue a motto for us, namely this, that for men and
women of this Order, this racial community of the SS, the word "work" will be writ
large; that no work done for Germany is shameful, be it with axe or spade or with the
pen, whether in agriculture, in the home or factory, or whether with the sword or
plough.

I am of the heretical opinion that we will be a poor people after the war, thank God. I
find that downright encouraging. If we were really rich and well-off, we would probably
not last long. We would collapse from sheer megalomania. We wouldn't know whether
we were coming or going from sheer conceit. Because the war costs a lot of money, and
because we must finance everything ourselves, I therefore truly believe that we will be a
poor people. We will therefore have to work again. Above all, we must keep people
from saying: "Servant girl, oh, no, no German girl can do that, that's for foreigners". We
would end up like the ancient Romans, bringing over slave nationalities by whom we
would be racially contaminated.

These are some of the great problems which are already weighing down upon me and
which concern me more than a lot of things in this war. The war must be carried on to
the end; we'll win it after all, we just don't need to make mistakes. The other questions,
however, winning the peace, winning over people's hearts again, letting them relax
again after the war, and then getting them back to work immediately, educating them;
these questions will be much more difficult at times. I believe, as I said, that the German
people, at the end of the war, will be, not pauperized, but poor; that we will have to be
very productive and work very hard. I hope we won't be so rich that we can only gobble
meat until our teeth fall out, and commit other acts of nutritional stupidity; but rather,
that all these things will be regulated by life itself.

I also believe that the evils of the bombing war will lead to a dispersion of the great
cities, so that we will be driven out onto the land a bit by our gracious God. Many
people will then say: "It's not so bad on the land at all; I've got a goat, somebody else
has a pig, we've got a few potatoes." That would be a very good start. Besides, we won't
suffer so many hard blows. That's really good for the immediate future. We would never
have been willing to spend the money required to tear down the cities. Now they've
been torn down by Fate, and we will probably rebuild them more rationally with more
open spaces.

We must recognize these things in time, and apply education correctly from the
outset. When you, as commanders, discover childish military vices such as an
Unterscharführer thinking that he doesn't have to work, then you must intervene.
Sometimes it goes so far -- not, thank God in our divisions -- that soldiers no longer dig
in. They seem to think: a Master Race doesn't dig in. It allows itself to be killed, but it
doesn't dig in. I want these things to be eradicated <ausrotten> as radically as possible
among us, so that they cease to be a habit.

9) Avoidance of alcohol

We really need waste no words on the subject of alcohol, we know that.

With the hundreds of thousands of men that we're losing in the war, we can't afford to
lose still more men, physically or morally, through addiction to alcohol and self-
destruction. Here as well, the best comradeship which you can extend to your
subordinates is the greatest, most merciless severity. Crimes committed under the
influence of alcohol must be punished twice as severely. Leaders who allow their
subordinates to hold drinking parties in their companies will be punished. I must request
that this be carried out everywhere.

Practical tasks

Now to the practical tasks, and then I will finish. Beginning with myself, I already told
you that, in the Reichsministry of the Interior, I see the practical work before us as
consisting of strengthening the authority of the Reich, and in defending domestic morale
and conduct. In the field of the Waffen SS, the main thing is to train leaders and
Unterfuehrers in sufficient numbers for the purpose of new formations, since I see that
we will have to intervene on an increasing basis among foreign nationalities. We will
therefore need Leaders and Unterfuehrers. These new formations will be the
responsibility of the SS Main Office during the initial recruiting stage; during the
second stage of training and armaments, they will be the responsibility of the SS
Leadership Main Office.

Another task, of particular concern to our Obergruppenfuehrer Pohl, will be the

increasing and strengthening of our armaments works and armaments efforts; the task of
the Order Police will to mop up the East, since the reduction in territory involved will
release gendarmerie and staff strengths, even if we only cover the territory using the
present strengths. The main thing is to mop up mercilessly, completely. Many will
weep, but that doesn't matter; there is a lot of weeping already. We must economize on
strength, since we will need intervention reserves here and there in this troubled Europe.
The work of the Security Police will increase in significance, since the war of nerves, of
psychological warfare, will reach a climax in the fifth and sixth year of the war.

For the Higher SS and Police Leaders, in terms of practical tasks, I see a task which
also applies in particular to the Main Office. To me, the Higher SS and Police Leader is
the representative of the Reichsfuehrer SS in his sector. Woe, if the SS and Police ever
have a falling out. Woe, if the Main Offices ever become independent from each other
with regards to their subordinates through well a well-intended, but incorrect, notion of
their responsibilities, each with its own hierarchy of authority.

That would, I firmly believe, be the end of the SS, if anybody ever shoots me out of
hand. It must and shall be, that this Order of the SS, with all its great sectors -- the
whole basis of the Allgemeine SS, Order Police, Security Police, general economic
management, training, ideological education, the whole genealogical question -- shall
form one block, one body, one order, even under the decimated Reichsfuehers SS. Woe,
if we fail to bring that about. Woe, if the individual Main offices, the individual chiefs,
ever get a false idea of their tasks here; if they believe they are doing good, when in
reality they are taking the first step towards ruin. We have come a long way on the path
towards fusion. In the bitterest hours of the hard struggle of this year, the Waffen SS
was merged together from the most diverse divisions and units, out of which it formed
the Leibstandarte, the reserves, Death's Head units, and finally the Germanic SS. When
our Divisions "Das Reich", "Death's Head", Cavalry and "Viking" fought together just
recently, everyone knew, especially in the past few weeks: "The 'Viking' is with me, the
'Reich' is with me, the 'Death's Head' is with me"; nothing can happen to us, thank
God."

The Order Police and Security Police, the Allgemeine SS, and Waffen SS must now
gradually merge, jÄ
t as it is and must be within the Waffen SS. This is already happening in the area of
appointments to office, recruiting, training, economic affairs, and medical treatment. I'm
always doing something to accomplish this purpose; over and over again, a band is
being wrapped around this bundle of shoots, to allow it to grow together. Woe, if these
bands should ever loosen, since everything -- you may well believe it -- would sink
back into its old meaninglessness in a generation, in the shortest period of time. One
could then say: that wouldn't be a shame; if it is incapable of living, let it die. That is
true. Nor would I ever wish to keep anything alive, even my -- our -- SS, which is so
dear to us, if it is incapable of living. I simply believe, however, that we could not bear
responsibility for it before Germany, before the germanic world; because this germanic
Reich needs the Order of the SS. It will need it for at least the next few centuries.
Another form for it will certainly be found in one hundred, a thousand, two thousand
years. When we're finished, some remnant will be saved and maintained by us, together
with a few basic ideas. Something new will arise from that remnant, just as we held out
our hand to grasp the torch held out to us, here and there, from the age of the germanic
tribes, from the age of chivalry, from the Vehmic organizations <secret medieval
courts similar to American vigilante committees; anti-French resistance
organizations under the occupation of the Rhineland>, from the Prussian army; we
are now the bearers of that torch, for the purpose of kindling a great Light. Thus shall it
be in later times. Today, I believe, we cannot afford to anything happen to this SS. I
therefore urge one thing to you all, you, my Main Office Chiefs, my Higher SS and
Police Leaders, to the entire corps of Group Leader, to the highest level of hierarchy of
the Order of the SS: always look at the whole, always see the Order as a whole, never
just look at your own sector, never just look at your own Upper Section, but always
look at the SS, and above that, the germanic Reich, and above that, our Fuehrer, who
created this Reich and who is still creating it.

Party and army

Unity, which is more important than ever in Germany today, must be a Sacred
Commandment to us, even if we may get angry over something or other once in a while.
We need complete unity with the Party and with all its institutions. Fortunately, unity
with the SA already exists. The new Chief of Staff Schepmann also views the creation
of peace and harmony between old Party organizations as his most important task. We
need unity with the armed forces. We know that, as political soldiers, we think that
many things in various units of the armed forces are out of date, unattractive, or
incorrect. Always look at the positive; consider it your task to win men over; be a
missionary. Don't look at the negative; don't look at what you don't like, but try to win
men over who are often thirsting for a message. Try to make them understand the
meaning of the war, and of the tasks that you are carrying out. Teach them about the
racial question. We are, after all, fortunate enough to be able to say that we know all
about that. That is what gives us our strength, that which makes us invulnerable to
crisis. Take the trouble to communicate and propagate these thoughts. Every company
chief to whom you communicate our ideas will become stronger, and his company will
become stronger. Every division commander not rejected or insulted by you, but rather
won over, will be a relentlessly uncompromising fighter in this war, with 15,000-20,000
men behind him. That means he'll hold the front; because it's the heart that holds the
front; not the body, not the weapons, not the cannons.

SS Helferinnen <female auxiliaries>

There is another point I want to mention here. We have already thinned our ranks very
seriously. Where we can still spare a man, we want him out. After long hesitation, I
have agreed that SS Obergruppenfuehrer Sachs, who came to me with this plan, should
create a school for SS Helferinnen in Oberehnheim. I must say that this newest SS
institution of the SS is also making very good progress so far. I have set myself the task
in this respect of creating a form which was neither an institution for clerks, nor one for
merry-making. The German people, with all its values, must after all succeed in calling
into being an institution similar to the Finnish Lottas. We must attempt to achieve --
through a selection of these girls, so that truly the most valuable will come to us, as well
as through an awakening of their feeling of honour -- that which cannot be achieved
through compulsion, not through curfews, punishments, and all other kinds of
compulsion.

In this connection, gentlemen Obergruppenfuehrer and Gruppenfuehrer, it is your job,

each of you, to make an effort to send us every valuable young girl of your acquaintance
or from among your blood relatives, just as we used to recruit men for the Waffen SS
and Junkers for the Leader career. Our comrade and friend Waldeck has behaved ideally
in this regard, and has sent us his daughter. He is now going to send us his second
daughter. The Upper Section which has helped the most in this new area has been
Hoffmann's Upper Section Southwest. This will help us achieve one thing: every girl
that we can use, will replace one man. A bit of nonsense occurred in one office, since
soldiers and SS Men are, after all, very stubborn. There, the commander said: "I'll let
these girls train SS Men as communications assistants in the communications service,
then I'll send the girls away; I don't want girls in my unit". That is, of course, not really
the purpose of the institution; rather, the purpose is the other way around, to use the
girls to replace the men. But I think that generally that will all be straightened out. I am
now asking you to treat these girls with all your chivalry, all your sense of justice, all
your concern; take care that this institution remains sacred; act with all the nobility
which, in other respects, really exists in our ranks. I don't want any jokes here; these are
our daughters; they're the sisters of SS Men, and are intended to be the brides of
younger SS Men and Leaders.

When I met these girls, I said that when a man wants to marry one of them and he
finds out she was an SS Helferin, he mustn't say: "No, for God's sake, it's out of the
question". Rather, when a man wants to marry one of them and he finds out she was an
SS Helferin, he must say, "Yes, I can marry her, she's all right". That's how it must be.
That is how the girls must behave; that is how you commanders must look out for them,
and enforce this attitude with regards to your subordinates.

The future

The immediate future will, I believe, bring very heavy burdens; we will have a hard
winter, a hard early year, before us. The assault in the East will be bitter as never before.
The partisan war will increase. As soon as the thaw permits, landings and air attacks by
the English and Americans will increase as well. This winter, the motto must be: "Stand,
resist, have faith, hit back, fight, never give in". That is the main thing.

Whatever it takes to end the war and achieve victory, one thing must be clear in our
minds at all times: a war must first be won spiritually, in terms of will and soul; after
that, physical, bodily, material victory is only a result.

Only he who capitulates, only he who says, "I've lost my faith, my will to resist", can
lose; because he has laid down his weapons. He who fights and resists stubbornly, until
an hour past the conclusion of peace, has won. We need all the stubborness we possess,
all the obduracy that distinguishes us so absolutely; all our tenacity, all our obstinacy,
all our pig-headedness. We want to show the English, the Americans, and the Russian
sub-humans that we are tougher; that we, precisely we, the SS, will be those who stand
forever. We wish to be the ones who return to fight again and again, whenever the
opportunity arises, even in the 5th and 6th years of the war, with good humour; not with
faces as bitter as the dead, but with humour, will, and drive. If we do that, many others
will follow our example, and will stand as well. In the last analysis, we must have the
will, and we have it, cooly and soberly to kill <umbringen> anyone who, in any
position, no longer wishes to go on fighting in Germany -- that can happen under stress.
It is better to put a certain number up against the wall than to allow a breach to be
opened anywhere in our lines. If we are prepared spiritually, in terms of will and
intellect, then we will win the war according to the laws of history and of nature;
because we incorporate the higher human values, the higher, more powerful values of
nature.
 As I said already, our work will begin after we've won the war. We don't know when
the war will be over. It can happen suddenly, it can take a long time. We'll see when it
happens. But I am already predicting to you today, when armistice and peace suddenly
come along, let no one believe that he can simply fall back and sleep the sleep of the
just. Make sure all your commanders, chiefs, and SS Leaders understand this: because,
gentlemen, if we once relax, a great many others will fall into the same sleep as well.
I'm going to wake up the SS so thoroughly, and keep it so wide awake, that we can go
straight to work building Germany. The germanic work will then begin immediately in
the Allgemeine SS; the harvest is ripe, and ready to be carried to the granery. We'll
recruit the young by conscription. We'll put all our Waffen SS units in top shape in
terms of armaments and training. For the first half year after the war, we'll work as if the
big attack were coming the very next day. It will be decisive for Germany to have an
operative reserve of 20, 25, or 30 intact SS divisions at the negotiations for peace or an
armistice.

When the final peace comes, then we'll be ready to proceed with our great work of the
future. We will colonize; we will educate the young in the laws of the Order of the SS. I
consider it absolutely crucial to the life of our people that concepts such as "ancestors",
"grandchildren" and "future" not be taught as external matters, but that they become a
part of our being. It must be a matter of course for us to have children, without question,
without the need for offer premiums and material incentives. It must be a matter of
course that the greatest number of descendents should issue from this Order, from this,
the racial upper stratum of the germanic people. We must be truly capable of supplying
the leadership stratum for all of Europe in 20 or 30 years. If the SS, together with the
farmers, if we, together with out friend Backe, then colonize the East, in bold strokes,
without inhibition, not inquiring about traditional methods, with revolutionary drive and
impetus, then we'll be able to extend the racial borders of the Reich by 500 kilometres to
the East in 20 years.

I asked the Führer today to grant the SS -- if we fulfill our tasks and duties until the
end of the war -- the privilege of maintaining the outermost German border to the East
in a military sense. I believe this is the only privilege in which we need fear no
competition. I don't believe that anyone will dispute us this privilege. There, we will be
able to train every age group in the practical use of weapons. We will dictate our laws to
the East. We shall burst forth and press gradually onwards to the Urals. I hope that our
generation succeeds in enabling every age group to fight in the East, so that every
divisions spends a winter in the East every two or three years. Then we'll never grow
soft; we'll never have uniform-bearers who only come to us because it's comfortable,
because the black uniform naturally looks very attractive during peacetime. Everybody
will know that if he joins the SS, there will always be a possibility of getting killed.
He'll know he won't be dancing in Berlin or celebrating Carnival in Munich every other
year; rather, he'll be stationed on the Eastern border in an ice cold winter. This will
ensure us a healthy selection for all time. This will enable us to create the preconditions
for the entire germanic people and for all of Europe, led, ordered, and trained by us, the
germanic people, over generations, to resist the fateful struggle with an Asia certain to
break forth once again.

We don't know when that will be. When the "mass man" arises on the other side with
1 to 1.5 billion people, then the germanic people with its, I hope, 250 to 300 million
people, together with the other European peoples, for a total of 600 to 700 million
people, on a perimeter extending the Urals, or, in one hundred years, extending over the
Urals, will carry on its battle for life against Asia. Woe, if the germanic people should
fail to resist in this struggle. That would be the end of beauty and culture, of the creative
power of this earth. That is the distant future. That is what we are fighting for: it is our
duty to pass on the heritage of our ancestors.

We see into the future because we know the future. That is why we do our duty more
fanatically than ever, with greater faith than ever before, more bravely, more obediently,
more decently than ever before. We want to be worthy of being the Führer Adolf
Hitler's first SS Men in the long history of the germanic people, a history which stands
before us.

Now let us honour the Führer, our Führer Adolf Hitler, who created the germanic
Reich, and who will lead us into the germanic future.

Our Führer Adolf Hitler

Sieg heil!
Sieg heil!
Sieg heil!

(Handwritten notes not translated; they appear to fit the outline of the speech,
but are mostly illegible)

End of translation, Document 1919-PS, Nuremberg Trial