Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Contents
Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 2
Objectives ................................................................................................................................................... 2
Equipment ................................................................................................................................................... 3
Method/Test Procedure ............................................................................................................................... 5
Closed End Condition .............................................................................................................................. 5
Results- Open End Condition ................................................................................................................... 6
Closed End Condition .............................................................................................................................. 7
Calculations -Youngs modulus .................................................................................................................. 9
Poissons ratio ........................................................................................................................................... 10
Principle stresses (closed ends condition)................................................................................................. 11
Mohrs circle of strain (closed ends condition) ........................................................................................ 12
Factor of safety ......................................................................................................................................... 13
Discussion/Comparison of Values ............................................................................................................ 14
Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................ 16
References ................................................................................................................................................. 16
Appendix 1 ................................................................................................................................................ 17
Appendix 2 ................................................................................................................................................ 18
Appendix 3 ................................................................................................................................................ 19
Appendix 4 ................................................................................................................................................ 20
Mechanical Engineering
Introduction
An experiment was carried out utilising the TQ SM1007 Thin cylinder testing machine. The cylinder
was pressurised and the stress and strain that the cylinder was exposed to was measured and recorded.
The relationship between the stress and strain was then analysed and using a number of different
scientific principles, compared to the theory.
Objectives
Using experimental apparatus to measure strains on the surface of a thin cylinder which is subjected to
an internal pressure, and incorporating theory this assignment had the following objectives:
a. Determine Youngs Modulus for the cylinder material and compare this to the stated value.
b. Determine Poissons Ratio for the cylinder material and compare this to the stated value.
c. Calculate experimental values for the principal stresses created in the cylinder walls (using the
measured principal strain values) and comparing these to the theoretical values (calculated
using thin cylinder theory).
d. Construct a Mohrs circle of strain using the principle strain gauge values, and then compare the
non-principal strain gauge readings to those found from using the Mohrs circle.
e. Apply appropriate theories of failure to determine a factor of safety for the cylinder at the
maximum level of internal pressure.
f. Explain why the six strain gauges did what they did.
Mechanical Engineering
Equipment
TQ SM1007 Thin cylinder testing machine (see appendices 1)
Pressure
Gauge
Strain
Gauge
Frame
Hand
Wheel
Pressure
Release
Valve
Hand
Pump
Computer
Connection
Arrangement of
Strain Gauges
and Gauge
Factor
Mechanical Engineering
Hoop stress
Axial
stress
Mechanical Engineering
Method/Test Procedure
Open End Condition
The pressure relief valve was opened and then the hand wheel was turned clockwise until it stopped
turning. At this point the pistons were pushed in so that the frame would take axial stress. This meant
that the cylinder was in open ends condition and would only be significantly subjected to hoop stress.
The apparatus was then connected to the computer and the pressure and strain gauges were zeroed by
pressing F4. The first strain and pressure readings were then taken at 0 MN/
by pressing F2 which
recorded them in a table.
The pressure relief valve was then tightened and the hand pump was slowly pumped until the pressure
reading was 0.5 MN/ . It was necessary to wait a couple of seconds after the final pump as it took a
while for the readings to stabilise. If the pressure exceeded this number by too much then some pressure
was released using the pressure release valve. The pump could be pumped again if too much pressure
was lost. If the pressure reading was within 0.02 of the desired pressure then strain and pressure readings
could still be taken. After the readings were taken the pressure was taken up in 0.5 MN/
increments
and readings taken until the pressure read 3 MN/ .
Mechanical Engineering
6
0.0
97.8
199.8
294.5
390.7
489.3
586.9
Strain gauges are designed to measure strain along their length. If this length
increases the resistance in the gauge increases, leading to higher strain readings. If
this length decreases the resistance decreases leading to negative strain readings.
Strain gauge one and six travel in the direction of the hoop stress. Therefore they had
the highest strain values as they would lengthen the most longitudinally whilst
narrowing the least transversely. They are very close to one another in value but are slightly different as
the cylinder wont uniformly deform if there are any variances in the thickness or structure.
Strain gauge two had negative readings as the hoop stress caused the strain gauge to shorten due to the
transverse strain whilst the longitudinal strain would have an insignificant effect on it.
Strain gauge three had readings around zero. This would indicate that at an angle of 60 to the hoop
stress, the longitudinal and transverse strain cancel each other out. As this angle is halfway between the
angle of gauges two and four it was expected that the gauge reading would be halfway between these
two figures which it was.
Strain gauge four is at an angle of 45 to the hoop stress. Therefore it
would be expected that the gauge readings would be halfway
between the readings for gauges one/six and gauge two. These
results confirmed what was expected.
Strain gauge five is at an angle of 30 to the hoop stress. Therefore it
would be expected that the gauge readings would be halfway
between gauge four and gauge six. This was again confirmed by the
results.
Aberdeen College - 2013
Mechanical Engineering
/ MNm
3.00
476.1
103.0
191.1
297.8
383.2
493.5
Mechanical Engineering
Taking in the hoop to axial stress ratio and poisons ratio it could have been expected that gauge two
would be about a sixth of the strain value of gauge one at the same pressure in the open ends condition.
Although the actual gauge reading is less than this it was pretty close at 103.0 compared to 96.5.
It was expected that gauge four would be halfway between the readings for gauges one/six and gauge
two. This would be around the 300 mark and at 297.8 it was very close.
Gauge three should be halfway between the gauge two and the gauge four readings at about 200. At
191.1 this is reasonably close.
Gauge five should be halfway between the values for gauge four and gauges one/six. This would be
around 395, but the actual reading was 383.2 which wasnt too bad.
Mechanical Engineering
To measure the strain running in the direction of the hoop stress, strain gauges running in the same
direction must be used. Therefore strain gauges one and six were used to record the necessary strain
readings.
As the hoop stress was created by the high pressure of the oil within the cylinder it was hard to directly
measure the hoop stress. Therefore it had to be calculated using
with p being the pressure
within the cylinder which was read off of the gauge, d being the inside diameter of the cylinder and t
being the thickness of the cylinder wall.
when thickness (t) = 0.003m and internal diameter (d)= 0.080m. Therefore
Pressure (p)
(MN/m)
0
0.5
1.02
1.5
2
2.5
3
0
6.666666667
13.6
20
26.66666667
33.33333333
40
0
95.8
197.1
291.2
386.5
483.7
579.9
0
97.8
199.8
294.5
390.7
489.3
586.9
y1=0
y2= 32.5
x1=0, x2=475
Mechanical Engineering
Poissons ratio
For simple stress
y2= 164
x1=
, x2=515
10
Mechanical Engineering
The principle stresses in a thin cylinder in the closed ends condition are hoop stress and axial stress. The
main difference between this and the open ends condition being that the pistons push against the ends of
the cylinder as the hand wheal isnt screwed in to take the axial stress. Therefore the cylinder is exposed
to hoop and axial stress.
E is the youngs modulus of elasticity determined during the open ends condition and is Poissons ratio
also determined at that time.
is the hoop strain that was an average of the hoop strain measured by
gauges one and six. is the axial strain that was measured by gauge two. Using these values and the
formula above it was possible to calculate.
=484.8
40
= 40 MN/
11
Mechanical Engineering
Gauge diagram
then marked upon the line. These two marks were used
Non
as two points on the diameter of a circle so that the
principle
circle could be drawn in with a Centre point. The line
gauge
from the centre point to the marked on minor principal
strain
strain point was coloured in blue. This corresponded to
the axial strain line on the above diagram of gauges.
From the centre point to the major principle strain
point was coloured in red as this corresponded to the
hoop strain lines on the gauge diagram. To find the
theoretical strain gauge value for a nonprincipal strain value a line had to be drawn
from the centre of the circle to its
circumference. The angle of this line was double the
angle of the strain gauge either in relation to the hoop
strain line or axial strain line. So if the gauge angle was
Mohrs Circle Diagram
measured from the horizontal blue axial strain line on
the gauge diagram then it would have to be measured
from the blue line in the Mohrs circle. The angle
measured on the circle was double the angle measured on the strain gauge diagram. If the angle of the
strain gauge had been measured from a vertical red hoop strain line then this angle would be doubled
and measured from the red line in the Mohrs circle.
Utilising the scale used to mark on the major and minor strain points, the direct strain for the nonprincipal gauge could be measured. The horizontal distance from the circumference point to the
reference line (shear strain line) was a graphical representation of the direct strain. Therefore it could be
measured with a ruler.
(See appendices 4 for Mohrs circle of strain diagrams and theoretical values)
12
Mechanical Engineering
Factor of safety
Tresca
Von Misses
13
Mechanical Engineering
Discussion/Comparison of Values
Youngs modulus
The difference between the experimental value and the theoretical value is very small although the
experimental value is slightly smaller. This could be for a number of reasons. Either the theoretical
value for youngs modulus is wrong or mistakes such as the line of best fit being slightly wrong caused
an error in the experimental value. Temperature can also affect this but this wouldnt have played a
major part as it was conducted at room temperature.
Poissons ratio
The experimental value was 2.424% smaller than the theoretical value. This could have been caused by
the line of best fit not being totally perfect. If there were more readings taken then perhaps the
experimental value would be closer to the theoretical value. The gauges might not be precise enough or
the thin cylinder might have a slightly different chemical and crystalline structure than the theoretical
one.
Principal stresses
(All sizes in
The percentage error in both the principle stresses is about 1%, this would therefore indicate that one or
more of the variables used to calculate the experimental value was wrong. Although at only 1% this
percentage error is relatively small.
14
Mechanical Engineering
Strain gauge
3
4
5
30
45
60
Actual value
(
191.1
297.8
383.2
The percentage errors are both positive and negative which would give an indication that using Mohrs
circle of strain gives a very close approximation. If more tests were carried out there is every chance
that the percentage error would average out to zero.
Factors of safety
Using Trescas method of finding the factor of safety it was calculated to be 6.025 whilst using Von
Misses method it was found that the FOS was 7.038. Both of these findings indicate that the cylinder
was nowhere near failure at 3MN/m as with Trescas method predicting it wouldnt fail till
18.075MN/m and Von Misses method predicting failure wouldnt occur till pressure reached
21.114MN/m.
Trescas formula is more simplistic and conservative whereas Von Misses formula is more complicated
and gives a closer approximation. This would make Trescas method more favourable as a products
could be manufactured slightly weaker.
Overall accuracy
Overall the experiment got some good results and the percentage errors where relatively small. If the
experiment was repeated and there was more measurements taken with smaller increments there is no
doubt that the percentage errors could be reduced further. Although there is also a high likelihood that
the figures given by the manufacturer for the apparatus may be slightly wrong or that the strain or
pressure gauges were slightly out.
15
Mechanical Engineering
Conclusion
The experimental values for Youngs modulus, Poissons ratio and the principal stresses were found and
compared successfully against the theoretical values. Mohrs circles of strain for the non-principal
gauges in the complex stress situation were constructed and proved reasonably accurate. The theories of
failure determined two factors of safety which both proved the cylinder was kept well within safe limits.
Using the findings and the principles that were learnt it was possible to fully explain why the six strain
gauges read what they read. Therefore the experiment was a resounding success.
References
Matweb. (2011). aluminium 6063-T6. Available:
http://asm.matweb.com/search/SpecificMaterial.asp?bassnum=MA6063T6. Last accessed 03 Jun 2013
16
Mechanical Engineering
Appendix 1
Overall dimension
26kg
Recommended oil
Approximately 2 litres
capacity
Pressure gauge
Nominal dimensions
80 mm internal diameter ( D )
3mm wall thickness ( t )
358.8mm length
Cylinder material
69GN/m
Poissons ratio
0.33
Strain gauges
17
Mechanical Engineering
Appendix 2
18
Mechanical Engineering
Appendix 3
19
Mechanical Engineering
Appendix 4
Shear strain
Shear strain
198.45
60
120
direct strain
direct strain
Centre
103
103
484.8
Shear strain
484.8
90
293.9
direct strain
0
103
484.8
Strain gauge
3
4
5
20
Actual value
(*
191.1
297.8
383.2
Mechanical Engineering