0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
1K visualizzazioni1 pagina
The defendant Pedro T. Villanueva was accused of treason for aiding the Japanese Imperial Army as a secret agent, informer and spy during the Japanese occupation. Witnesses testified that Villanueva participated in punitive expeditions by the Japanese forces that involved robbery, arson, and mass murder. Villanueva denied the charges and claimed he only served under duress to save lives. The court ruled that mere denial could not overcome the witnesses' positive testimony. It also found Villanueva did not prove he faced immediate danger or had no chance to escape, as required to claim duress. The court affirmed the lower court's decision but commuted the death penalty due to a lack of sufficient votes
Descrizione originale:
Criminal Law II Case Digest
Titolo originale
People vs. Villanueva g.r. No. L-9529 August 30, 1958
The defendant Pedro T. Villanueva was accused of treason for aiding the Japanese Imperial Army as a secret agent, informer and spy during the Japanese occupation. Witnesses testified that Villanueva participated in punitive expeditions by the Japanese forces that involved robbery, arson, and mass murder. Villanueva denied the charges and claimed he only served under duress to save lives. The court ruled that mere denial could not overcome the witnesses' positive testimony. It also found Villanueva did not prove he faced immediate danger or had no chance to escape, as required to claim duress. The court affirmed the lower court's decision but commuted the death penalty due to a lack of sufficient votes
The defendant Pedro T. Villanueva was accused of treason for aiding the Japanese Imperial Army as a secret agent, informer and spy during the Japanese occupation. Witnesses testified that Villanueva participated in punitive expeditions by the Japanese forces that involved robbery, arson, and mass murder. Villanueva denied the charges and claimed he only served under duress to save lives. The court ruled that mere denial could not overcome the witnesses' positive testimony. It also found Villanueva did not prove he faced immediate danger or had no chance to escape, as required to claim duress. The court affirmed the lower court's decision but commuted the death penalty due to a lack of sufficient votes
THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, plaintiff-appellee,
vs. PEDRO T. VILLANUEVA, defendant-appellant. FACTS: During the Japanese occupation, appellant Pedro T. Villanueva, a Filipino citizen owing allegiance to the United States of America and the Commonwealth of the Philippines, gave the enemy aid and comfort by rendering service with the Japanese Imperial Army as secret agent, informer and spy, of its Detective Force in the province of Iloilo, and that in the performance of such service, he participated actively and directly in the punitive expeditions periodically made by the Japanese forces in the guerilla-infested areas of the province of Iloilo, and committed robberies, arson and mass-murders. Witnesses, who themselves were victims of the maltreatment and torture of the Japanese and others who were able to escape the raids made by the Japanese forces with the aid of Villanueva, testified with corroborated statements against the defendant. The defendant denied the overt acts imputed upon him, and avers that if he ever served in the detective force of the Japanese Army, it was because he was made to accept the position under duress, and that his acceptance of such position was for the good of the people, he having saved many Filipino lives from Japanese atrocities. Villanueva was sentenced to death by the People's Court for the crime of treason. The case was elevated to the Tribunal for mandatory review, for judgments of the lower courts imposing death penalties. ISSUE: Whether or not his denials and defense of duress exerted by the Japanese Imperial Army upon him will suffice to exempt him from the crime of treason? RULING: The Court ruled that mere denial by appellant cannot prevail upon the positive assertion and corroboration of the statements of witnesses for the government establishing incriminating facts. It is a well settled rule of evidence that as between positive and negative testimony, the former deserves more weight and credit. With regards to his defense of duress allegedly exerted by the Japanese upon him for which he had to serve in the Detective Force of the Japanese Army, the defendant was not able to present sufficient proof that he was indeed coerced or compelled by the Japanese but merely stated self-serving testimonies. Duress, force, fear or intimidation to be available as a defense, the fear must be well-founded, an immediate and actual danger of death or great bodily harm must be present and the compulsion must be of such a character as to leave no opportunity to accused for escape or selfdefense in equal combat. A threat of future injury is not enough. Hence, the decision of the lower court was affirmed with modifications on the indemnities imposed and that the penalty of death be commuted to reclusion perpetua due to lack of sufficient votes to impose the justifiable penalty of death. -------- ======== // ========--------
1|C r i m i n a l L a w I I C a s e D i g e s t s 2