October 28, 2011 by marystewart 1 Comment Uncategorized
Edward Relph is a Geographer and author of Place and
Placelessness. Relph categorizes place as less of where something is on a map and more what happens there and your emotional connection. I would view this definition sort of like being drawn somewhere or avoiding a spot not because of the architecture but because of what experience you associate with happening there. I thought it was very unique that Relph incorporated the social sense of insideness into the actual insideness of a space (Relph). A space is not just the walls that form it but what goes on within the walls as well. Relph describes placelessness as the bare minimum, removing everything that is invested in what makes a place and space. I enjoyed his quote by Stephen Klutz saying You have seen it, heard it, experienced it all before, and yet you have seen and experienced nothing (Relph). Christian Norberg-Schulz is the author of Phenomenon of Place. Norberg-Schulz studied works on phenomenology and how it attempts to explain how people receive sensory material about the physical world. His concept on place is made up of environmental character (Norberg-Schulz). This character includes many things that Relph would disassociate. Norberg-Schulz feels more that places are made up of tangible and visible qualities. Norberg- Schulz categorizes inside and outside by their natural and physical barriers (Norberg-Schulz). Space is noted by a structures actual role in the physical location, or the three dimensional organization of elements (Norberg-Schulz). Norberg-Schulz introduces the idea of character when describing the atmosphere of the space. This notion is likely the most emotional of his ideals. Character in his sense is
the basic aura a room or establishment gives off and it
should comply with standards. The character is still achieved through materials and construction (NorbergSchulz). Norberg-Schulz interprets Kevin Lynchs analysis of elements to be things, with character, and meaning (Norberg-Schulz). Oldenburg wrote about the problem of place in America. The idea of the text was not to define space and place but to demonstrate the absence of them. Oldenburg gave examples of how our American suburbia has eliminated tradition and connectivity that used to allow for an emotional tie to space and place. The recent atmosphere of suburban homes is not like the walkable communities where you ran into your friends at the corner store (Oldenburg). I agree with the points made about how Europe may have less space for residential areas, but with that space they accomplish more connections (Oldenburg). I found Oldenburgs solution for our neighborhoods interesting. It was proposed that we improve domestic, productivity, and social aspects (Oldenburg). The productivity relates to the blurb about housewives being bored and playing tennis (Oldenburg). The dilemma of productivity was a new concept to me.
Works Cited Norberg-Schulz, Christian. The Phenomenon of Place. Macdonald, Larice and.The Urban Design Reader. New York: Routledge, 2007. 125-127.
Oldenburg, Ray. The Problem of Place in America.
Macdonald, Larice and. The Urban Design Reader. New York: Routledge, 2007. 138-148. Relph, Edward. Prospects for Places. Macdonald, Larice and. The Urban Design Reader. New York: Routledge, n.d. 119-148.