Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
M.D.;
Ikaheimo,
Seppo Sutinen,
M.D.,
FCC,P.;
M.D.;
and Paavo Paakko,
M.D.
percent) but much less specific than the others (79 percent).
the left-to-right
available,
and
numerous
electrocardio-
right
ventricular
hypertrophy
(RVH)
813
1 7
and
T h e sen-
7 1 1 1 4 1 6
17
By definition,
essential for an accurate diagnosis of R V H or pulmonary heart disease in correlative studies, since the muscular mass of both cardiac ventricles should be measured separately at autopsy, eg, by the method of Fulton
et al.
18
separately
at autopsy
We
also
made
an
attempt to compile a new set of criteria giving improved sensitivity without a decrease in specificity.
PATIENTS A N D METHODS
13
16
RV
160
140
120
rf>
100
80-1
15
60
= Group 1
= Group 2
= Group 3
40
20
)
50
100
!
150
200
250
300
350 400
LV+S
F l G l ' H E 1. Distribution of ventricular weights in patients with
normal weights (group 1), combined right and left ventricular
hypertrophy (group 2) and isolated right ventricular hypertrophy
(group 3). RV, free wall of right ventricle; LV+S, left ventricle with
septum.
839
V,.
2. R amplitude<S amplitude in V .
3. R or R' amplitude<S amplitude in 1.
4. Incomplete right bundle branch block with QRS duration
less than 0.12 second.
An ECG is considered diagnostic for RVH if criterion 1 or two or
more of criteria 2-4 are met. Criteria 5-7 reinforce the diagnosis.
5. P amplitude 2:0.25 mm in 2.
6. Right axis deviations 110 degree.
7. T-inversion in leads V, to V or in leads 2 and 3.
Heikkila *
1. Right axis deviations 110, no RBBB.
2. R or R' amplitude^ amplitude in V, or V .t
3. R amplitude's amplitude in V , no anterior myocardial
infarct.
An ECG is considered diagnostic for RVH if one or more of criteria
1-3 is met. Criteria 4-5 reinforce the diagnosis.
4. P amplitude>0.25 mV in leads 1, 2 or aVE
5. P axis + 6 0 - + 90 degree (P in aVF>P in lead 2).
Louridas et al
1. R or R' amplitude>S amplitude in V,.t
2. R amplitude<S amplitude in V or V .
3. ST segment depression and T inversion in V, and V .
4. Intrinsicoid deflection>0.04 s.
An ECG is considered diagnostic for RVH if two or more of the
criteria are met.
Butler et al
1. A + R - P L a 0 . 7 m V
A = maximal R or R' amplitude in V, or V
R = maximal S in lead 1 or V
PL = minimal S in VI or minimal r in lead 1 or V
2. R amplitude0.2 mV in lead 1.
3. P amplitude20.25 mV in leads 2, 3, aVF, V, or V. .
An ECG is considered diagnostic for RVH if two or more of the
criteria are met.
s
Underlying
Causes of Death
Respiratory diseases
Emphysema
Asthma
Neoplasms
Others
Cardiovascular diseases
Ischemic heart diseases
Cerebrovascular disease
Others
Other causes of death
Total
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
8
4
1
2
1
7
2
5
0
9
24
1
1
0
0
0
13
9
1
3
1
15
12
9
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
12
21
20
10
51
13
*In this Finnish Textbook of ECG the criteria for RVH are modified
from the studies by Sokolow and Lyon and Milnor.
tAccording to Milnor the criterion R or R'aS in V, or V may be
substituted for the criterion R>S.
2
- X 100 percent
No. of cases without disease (RVH)
The sensitivity of a test is defined as its ability to detect a disease
in those who harbor it:
No. of true positive cases
- X100 percent
Sensitivity =
No. of cases with disease (RVH)
For the assessment of emphysema, one lung of each patient was
radiographed, fixed intrabronchially with formalin-polyethylene
glycol-alcoho! solution, dried with air insufflation, sliced sagittally,
and examined on the basis of gross specimens, histologic sections
and radiographs of excised lungs as described previously The
severity of emphysema was evaluated using a set of photographs of
standard grades. Grade 0 represented normal lung; grades 5 to 50,
mild to moderate emphysema; and grade 60 or more, severe
emphysema. In seven cases in the control group (group 1), the
severity of emphysema was evaluated only on the basis of histologic
sections taken from both lungs.
Specificity =
19
20
21
22
RESULTS
et al)
Speci-
ficity
Groups
(Group 1) Group 2 Group 3 2 & 3
(n = 24) (n == 15) (n == 12) (n == 27)
(100)
(27)
(25)
7 (26)
0 (100)
6
(75)
1
(96)
3 (20)
5 (33)
4 (27)
1
5
4
(8) 4 (15)
(42) 10 (37)
(33) 8 (30)
(92)
(92)
(100)
3 (20)
3 (20)
1 (7)
3
1
3
(25)
2
0
2
0
(92)
(100)
5 (33)
5 (33)
4
7
(33) 9 (33)
(58) 12 (44)
0
0
(100)
(100)
1 (7)
4 (27)
3
6
(25) 4 (15)
(50) 10 (37)
(100)
(0)
(8)
(4)
3
3
0
0
6
(88)
(0)
(27)
(27)
(33)
2
0
4
4
5
(17)
(75)
3
0
4
4
5
(20)
(88)
(100)
(100)
(0)
(33)
(33)
(42)
5
0
8
8
9
(19)
(0)
(30)
(30)
(33)
(100)
(7)
(0)
(4)
0
5
1
3
(100) 5 (33)
(79) 11 (73)
(96) 5 (33)
(88) 5 (33)
3
9
6
5
(8)
(25)
6 (22)
4 (15)
4 (15)
13
Intrinsicoid deflection
>0.04 s
Butler et al
A + R + PL>0.7 mV
R<0.2 mV in lead 1
Pa0.25 mV in leads
2, 3, aVF, V, or V
New set of criteria
QRS axissdegree, no
RBBB
R o r R ' a S i n V, o r V
RsS in V no anterior
infarct
A + R + PL>0.7mV
7
18
2426
2728
18
15
23
Sensitivity
No. (%)
(25) 8 (30)
(75) 20 (74)
(50) 11 (41)
(42) 10 (37)
Measurement of pulmonary arterial pressure sometimes is done to search for R V H or cor pulmonale.
The method is reliable, but it would be
reasonable to speak only of increased pulmonaryarterial pressure rather than R V H if the anatomic
degree of hypertrophy is unknown.
1 2 7
2 9
1130
3
1
(88)
(96)
3 (20)
8 (53)
2
9
(17) 5 (19)
(75) 17 (63)
0
0
(100)
(100)
1 (7)
4 (27)
3
6
(25) 4 (15)
(50) 10 (37)
0
1
(100)
0 (0)
5 (33)
1
6
(8) 1 (4)
(50) 11 (41)
6>
(96)
31
The time-honored method of measuring the thickness of the right ventricle in millimeters is still used
30
841
with RVH.
Most of the sets of criteria for diagnosing RVH were
slightly more sensitive in detecting isolated rather
than combined RVH, but none of them, not even that
proposed by us, was able to distinguish between these
two types.
We conclude that the presence of anatomic R V H
may be diagnosed from a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram in almost two thirds of men who have this
condition by reference to one or more of the following
E C G criteria: right axis deviation of s i 10 degrees (no
right bundle branch block), R or R ' a m p l i t u d e ' s
amplitude in V, or V , R amplitude^ S amplitude in
V (no anterior myocardial infarct) and A 4- R P L s
0.7 mV Correspondingly, RVH may be ruled out in
practically all of those who do not have it if none of
these criteria is met. This set of criteria also is useful
in RVH patients with E C G changes due to myocardial
infarcts and left ventricular hypertrophy, although the
criteria have not yet been tested on women or young
patients.
2
fi
REFERENCES
23 Lamb D. Heart weight and assessment of ventricular hypertrophy. In: Dyke SD, et al, eds. Recent advances in clinical
pathology, series 6. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1973;133148
842
el al)