World Applied Programming, Vol (2), No (3), March 2012.

195-201
ISSN: 2222-2510
2011 WAP journal. www.waprogramming.com

Transversal Hypersurfaces of Almost Hyperbolic Contact

Manifolds Endowed with Semi Symmetric Metric Connection
Shamsur Rahman
Department of Mathematics
MANUU, Polytechnic
Darbhanga, Bihar India
shamsur81@yahoo.com
shamsurr@indiatimes.com

Abstract: Transversal hypersurfaces of Trans hyperbolic contact manifolds endowed with a semi symmetric
metric connection are studied. It is proved that transversal hypersurfaces of almost hyperbolic contact manifold
endowed with a semi symmetric metric connection admits an almost product structure and each transversal
hypersurfaces of almost hyperbolic contact metric manifold endowed with a semi symmetric metric connection
admits an almost product semi-Riemannian structure. The fundamental 2-form on the transversal hypersurfaces of
cosymplectic hyperbolic manifold and
trans hyberbolic Sasakian manifold endowed with a semi symmetric
-structure are closed. It is also proved that transversal hypersurfaces
metric connection with hyperbolic
of Trans hyperbolic contact manifold endowed with a semi symmetric metric connection admits a product
structure. Some properties of transversal hypersurfaces endowed with a semi symmetric metric connection are
proved.
Keywords: 53D40, 53C05.
I.
Let

INTRODUCTION

be a linear connection in an n-dimensional differentiable manifold

for all vector fields

and

on

and is of type

vanishes, otherwise it is non-symmetric. The connection

.The connection

. The torsion tensor

of

is given by

is symmetric if its torsion tensor

is metric if there is a Riemannian metric

in

such that

, otherwise it is non-metric. It is well known that a linear connection is symmetric if it is the Levi-Civita
connection.
In ([1], [9]), A. Friedmann and J. A. Schouten introduced the idea of a semi-symmetric linear connection in a
differentiable manifold. A connection is said to be semi symmetric if its torsion tensor is of the form
where is a 1-form. In [12], K. Yano considered a semi-symmetric metric connection and studied some of its
properties.
Almost contact metric manifold with an almost contact metric structure is very well explained by Blair [5]. In [23], S.
Tanno gave a classification for connected almost contact metric manifolds whose automorphism groups have the
maximum dimension. For such a manifold, the sectional curvature of plane sections containing is a constant, say .
He showed that they can be divided into three classes: (1) Homogenous normal contact Riemannian manifolds with
, (2) global Riemannian products of a line or a circle with a Kaehler manifold of constant holomorphic sectional
curvature if
and (3) a warped product space
if
. It is known that the manifolds of class (1) are
characterized by some tensorial relations admitting a contact structure. Kenmotsu [11] characterized the differential
geometric properties of the third case by tensor equation
. The structure so
obtained is now known as Kenmotsu structure. In general, these structures are not Sasakian [11].

195

Shamsur Rahman, World Applied Programming, Vol (2), No (3), March 2012.

Oubina studied a new class of almost contact Riemannian manifold known as trans-Sasakian manifold [7] which
generalizes both -Sasakian [7] and -Kenmotsu [7] structure.
M. D. Upadhayay studied almost contact hyperbolic
-structure [14]. Bhatt and Dubey studied on CRsubmanifolds of trans hyperbolic contact manifold [13]. B. Y. Chen studied Geometry of submanifolds and its
applications. Sci. Univ Tokyo. Tokyo, 1981. [3]. R. Prasad, M. M. Tripathi, J. S. Kim and J-H. Cho., studied some
properties of submanifolds of almost contact manifold [16], [17], [18], [19], [20].
II.
Let

be an

PRELIMINARIES

dimensional manifold with almost hyperbolic contact metric structure

a tensor field of type (1, 1), is a vector field,

following conditions [14] are satisfied
,
,
(2.1)

is a 1-form and

is the semi Riemannian metric on

(2.2)

where

is

. Then the

(2.3)
for vector fields
on
. An almost hyperbolic contact metric structure
hyperbolic contact [13] if and only if
(2.4)
for all smooth vector fields

on

and

non zero constant, where

on

is called trans

is the Levi-civita connection with respect

to . From (1.4) it follows that

(2.5)

for all smooth vector fields

on

On other hand, a semi symmetric metric connection on

is defined by

(2.6)
Using (1.1) and (1.6) in (1.4) and (1.5), we get respectively
(2.7)
(2.8)
Let

be a hypersurface of an almost hyperbolic contact manifold

equipped with an almost hyperbolic contact

structure
. We assume that the structure vector field never belongs to tangent space of the hypersurface ,
such that a hypersurface is called a transversal hypersurface of an almost contact manifold. In this case the structure
vector field can be taken as an affine normal to the hypersurface. Vector field
on
and are linearly
independent, therefore we may write
(2.9)
where is a (1, 1) tensor field and
From (2.9)

is a 1-form on

or,
(2.10)
(2.11)
Taking account of equation (2.11), we get
(2.12)
(2.13)
Thus we have

196

Shamsur Rahman, World Applied Programming, Vol (2), No (3), March 2012.

Theorem 2.1. Each transversal hypersurface of an almost hyperbolic contact manifold endowed with a semi
symmetric metric connection admits an almost product structure and a 1-form .
From (2.12) and (2.13), it follows that

(2.14)
Now, we assume that
induced metric on

admits an almost hyperbolic contact metric structure

also. Then for all

. We denote by g the

, we obtain

(2.15)
We define a new metric

on the transversal hypersurface given by

(2.16)
So,

Then, we get
(2.17)
where equation (2.12), (2.14), (2.15) and (2.16) are used.
Then is semi Riemannian metric on
that is

is an almost product semi-Riemannian structure on the

transversal hypersurface
of .
Thus, we are able to state the following.
Theorem 2.2. Each transversal hypersurface of an almost hyperbolic contact manifold endowed with a semi
symmetric metric connection admits an almost product semi-Riemannian structure. We now assume that
is
orientable and choose a unit vector field of
, normal to
symmetric metric connection are given respectively by
(2.18)

. Then Gauss and Weingarten formulae of semi

(2.19)
where

and

are respectively the Levi-civita and induced Levi-civita connections in

fundamental form related to

and

is the second

by

(2.20)

for any vector field

tangent to

, defining

(2.21)

(2.22)

(2.23)

,
,

(2.24)
for

,
we get an induced hyperbolic

-structure on the transversal hypersurface such that

(2.25)
(2.26)
(2.27)
(2.28)

,
,
,

(2.29)

197

Shamsur Rahman, World Applied Programming, Vol (2), No (3), March 2012.

(2.30)

for all for

where

(2.31)
Thus, we see that every transversal hypersurface of an almost hyperbolic contact metric manifold endowed with a semi
symmetric metric connection also admits a hyperbolic
-structure. Next we find relation between the
induced almost product structure
and the induced hyperbolic
-structure on the transversal
hypersurface of an almost hyperbolic contact metric manifold endowed with a semi symmetric metric connection. In
fact, we have the following
Theorem 2.3. Let
be a transversal hypersurface of an almost hyperbolic contact metric manifold
endowed with
a semi symmetric metric connection equipped with almost hyperbolic contact metric structure
induced almost product structure
Then we have
(2.32)
,

(2.33)
(2.34)

(2.35)

,
,

(2.36)
(2.37)

Proof.
(2.38)

(2.39)
.
From equation (2.38) and (2.39) we have
,

,
,

which is equation (2.33).

,

,
which is equation (2.35).
,
,
,
which is equation (2.34).

198

and

Shamsur Rahman, World Applied Programming, Vol (2), No (3), March 2012.

,
which is equation (2.36) here equations (2.26), (2.27), (2.28), (2.29), (2.30), (2.31) are used.
Lemma 2.4. Let
be a transversal hypersurface with hyperbolic
-structure of an almost hyperbolic
contact metric manifold

endowed with a semi symmetric metric connection. Then

(2.40)

(2.41)
(2.42)
(2.43)
for all

III.

. The proof is straight forward and hence omitted.

TRANSVERSAL HYPERSURFACES OF COSYMPLECTIC HYPERBOLIC MANIFOLD ENDOWED

WITH SEMI SYMMETRIC METRIC CONNECTION

Trans-Sasakian structures of type

are called -Sasakian and trans-Sasakian structures of type

-Kenmotsu structures. Trans-Sasakian structures of type

Theorem 3.1. Let

are called cosymplectic structures.

be a transversal hypersurfaces with hyperbolic

cosymplectic manifold

-structure of a hyperbolic

endowed with a semi symmetric metric connection. Then

(3.1)

(3.2)
(3.3)

are called

,
,

(3.4)
(3.5)

and

(3.6)
for all
.
Proof. Using (2.7), (2.20), (2.23) in (2.40), we obtain

Equating tangential and normal parts in the above equation, we get (3.1) and (3.2) respectively. Using (2.8) and (2.23)
in (2.41), we have
Equating tangential and normal parts we get (3.3) and (3.4) respectively. Using (2.7), (2.22) and (2.23) in (2.42)
Using (2.7), (2.22) and (2.23) in (2.42) and equating tangential, we get (3.5). In the last (3.6) follows from (2.43).
Theorem 3.2. If
be a transversal hypersurface with hyperbolic
-structure of a hyperbolic
cosymplectic manifold endowed with a semi symmetric metric connection, then the 2-form

on

is given by

is closed.
Proof. From (3.1) we get
,
.
Hence the theorem is proved.
Theorem 3.3. If
is a transversal hypersurface with almost product semi Riemannian structure
hyperbolic cosymplectic manifold endowed with a semi symmetric metric connection. Then the 2-form
given by
is closed.
199

of a
on

is

Shamsur Rahman, World Applied Programming, Vol (2), No (3), March 2012.

Using (3.1), we calculate the Nijenhuis tensor

and find that
.
Therefore, in view of theorem (3.2), we have
Theorem 3.4. Every transversal hypersurface of a trans hyperbolic cosymplectic manifold endowed with a semi
symmetric metric connection, admits product structure.
4. TRANSVERSAL HYPERSURFACES OF TRANS HYPERBOLIC SASAKIAN MANIFOLDS ENDOWED
WITH SEMI SYMMETRIC METRIC CONNECTION
Theorem 4.1. Let

be a transversal hypersurface with hyperbolic

Sasakian manifold

endowed with a semi symmetric metric connection. Then

-structure of a trans hyperbolic

(4.1)
(4.2)
.
(4.3)
(4.4)
(4.5)
(4.6)
for all
.
Proof. Using (2.7), (2.21), (2.23) in (2.40), we obtain

Equating tangential and normal parts in the above equation, we get (4.1) and (4.2) respectively. Using (2.8) and (2.23)
in (2.41), we have

Equating tangential and normal parts we get (4.3) and (4.4) respectively. Using (2.7), (2.22) and (2.23) in (2.42) and
equating tangential parts, we get (4.5) in the last (4.6) follows from (2.43).
Theorem 4.2. If
be a transversal hypersurface with hyperbolic
structure of a
trans
hyperbolic Sasakian manifold endowed with a semi symmetric metric connection, then the 2-form
is closed.
Proof. From (4.1) we get

which gives

If

, then

that is
.
Hence the theorem is proved.

200

on M is given by

Shamsur Rahman, World Applied Programming, Vol (2), No (3), March 2012.

Theorem 4.3. If

is a transversal hypersurface with almost product semi Riemannian structure

trans hyperbolic Sasakian manifold endowed with a semi symmetric metric connection. Then 2-form
by

of a
on

is given

is closed.
Using (4.1), we calculate the Nijenhuis tensor
and find that
.
Therefore, in view of theorem 4.2, we have
Theorem 4.4. Every transversal hypersurface of a trans hyperbolic Sasakian manifold endowed with a semi symmetric
metric connection admits a product structure.
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]

A. Friedmann and J. A. Schouten, Uber die Geometrie der halbsymmetrischen Ubertragungen, Math. Z. 21 (1924), no. 1, 211223.
A. Gray and L. M. Hervella, The sixteen classes of almost Hermitian manifolds and their liner invariants, Ann, Mat. Pura Appl., (4) 123 (1980)
35-58.
B. Y. Chen, Geometry of submanifolds and its applications. Sci. Univ Tokyo. Tokyo, 1981.
D. Chinea, P.S. Perestelo, Invariant submnifolds of a trans-Contact manifold, Publ. Math. Debrecen 38 (1991), 103-109, MR 92 g: 53025.
D. E. Blair, Contact manifolds in Riemannian geometry, Lecture Notes in math. 509. springer verlag, 1976.
D.E. Blair and J.A. Oubina, Conformal and related changes of metric on the product of two almost contact metric manifolds, Publications
Matematiques 34 (1990) 199-207.
D. Janssens, L. Vanhecke, Almost contact strucures and curvature tensors, Kodai Math. J. 4 (1981), 1-27.
J. A. Oubina, New classes of almost contact metic structures, Publ. Math. Debrecen 32 (1985) 187-193.
J. A. Schouten, Ricci Calculus, Springer, 1954.
J. C. Marrero, The local structure of trans-Contact manifolds. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4) 162 (1992), 77-86, MR 93j:53044.
K. Kenmotsu, A class of almost contact Riemannian manifolds, Tohoku Math. J. 24 (1972) 93-103.
K. Yano, On semi-symmetric metric connection, Rev. Roumaine Math. Pures Appl. 15 (1970), 1579{1586.
L. Bhatt and K.K. Dubey, On CR-submanifold of trans hyperbolic Contact manifold, Acta Cieme. Indica 29 No. 1, (2003), 91-96.
M. D. Upadhyay and K.K. Dubey, Almost Contact hyperbolic - structure, Acta Math. Acad. Scient Hung. 28 (1976), 13-15.
R. S. Mishra, Almost contact metric manifolds, Monograph 1, Tensor society of India, Lucknow, 1991.
R. Prasad, M.M. Tripathi and Jeong-Sik Kim, On generalized recci-recurrent trans contact manifolds, J. Korean Math. Soc. 39(2002), No. 6,
pp. 953-961.
R. Prasad, M.M. Tripathi and Jeong-Sik Kim, J-H Cho, On automorphism groups of an 2 framed manifold. Commun. Korean Math. Soc.
17(2002), No. 4, pp. 635-645.
R. Prasad and M. M. Tripathi, -horizontal hyper surfaces of Kemmotsu manifolds Bull. Cal. Math. Soc. 95, (2) 121-126 (2003).
R.Prasad and M.M. Tripathi, On non-invariant hyper surface of Trans-Contact manifolds. J. Int. Acad. Physical. Sci. Vol. 6(2002), No. 1, pp.
33-40.
R.Prasad and M.M. Tripathi, Transversal hyper surface of Kenmotsu manifold Indian J. pure appl. Math. 34 (3) : 443-452, March 2003.
S. Dragomir, L. Ornea, Locally conformal Kaehler geometry, Progress in Mathematics 155, Birkhauser 1998.
S. Kanemaki, On quasi-Contact manifolds, Diff. Geometry Banach Center Publications,12 (1984), 95-125.
S. Tanno, The automorphism groups of almost contact Riemannian manifolds, Tohoku Math. J. 21 (1969), 21-38.
U. H. Ki, J. S. Pak, H. B. Suh, On -structures, Kodai Math. Sem. Rep, 26 (1975), 160-175.

201