Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Contents
Page
Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.2-1
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.9
Live Loads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.9.1
Live Load Designation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.9.2
Live Load Analysis of Continuous Bridges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.9.3
Loading for Live Load Deflection Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.9.4
Distribution to Superstructure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.9.5
Bridge Load Rating . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.10
3.11
Wind Loads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.11.1 Wind Load to Superstructure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.11.2 Wind Load to Substructure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.11.3 Wind on Noise Walls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.12
3.13
3.14
3.15
3.16
Other Loads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.16.1 Buoyancy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.16.2 Collision Force on Bridge Substructure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.16.3 Collision Force on Traffic Barrier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.16.4 Force from Stream Current, Floating Ice, and Drift . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.16.5 Ice Load . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.16.6 Uniform Temperature Load . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.9-1
3.9-1
3.9-1
3.9-1
3.9-1
3.9-3
3.11-1
3.11-1
3.11-1
3.11-1
3.16-1
3.16-1
3.16-1
3.16-1
3.16-1
3.16-1
3.16-1
Page 3-i
Contents
3.99
Chapter 3
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.99-1
Appendix 3.1-A1
Appendix 3.1-B1
Page 3-ii
Chapter 3
Loads
3.1Scope
AASHTO Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) Specifications shall be the minimum design
criteria used for all bridges except as modified herein.
Page 3.1-1
Chapter 3
Page 3.1-2
Loads
Loads
Chapter 3
3.2 Definitions
The definitions in this section supplement those given in LRFD Section 3.
Permanent Loads Loads and forces that are, or are assumed to be, either constant upon completion
ofconstruction or varying only over a long time interval.
Transient Loads Loads and forces that can vary over a short time interval relative to the lifetime of
thestructure.
Page 3.2-1
Chapter 3
Page 3.2-2
Loads
Loads
Chapter 3
Page 3.3-1
Chapter 3
Page 3.3-2
Loads
Loads
Chapter 3
=
=
=
=
=
(3.4-1)
Limit State load modifier factor for ductility, redundancy, and importance of structure
Load factor
Load (i.e., dead load, live load, seismic load)
Resistance factor
Nominal or ultimate resistance
This equation states that the force effects are multiplied by factors to account for uncertainty in
loading, structural ductility, operational importance, and redundancy, must be less than or equal to the
available resistance multiplied by factors to account for variability and uncertainty in the materials
andconstruction.
Use a value of 1.0 for i except for the design of columns when a minimum value of i is appropriate.
In such a case, use i = 0.95. Compression members in seismic designs are proportioned and detailed
toensure the development of significant and visible inelastic deformations at the extreme event limit
states beforefailure.
Strength IV load combination shall not be used for foundation design.
Page 3.4-1
Chapter 3
Page 3.4-2
Loads
Loads
Chapter 3
CR, SH
Superstructure
1.0
1.0
0.5
0.5
1.0
1.0
Page 3.5-1
Chapter 3
Loads
Uplift
Lateral Loading
DCmax, DWmax
DCmin, DWmin
DCmax, DWmax
DCmax, DWmax
for causingmoments
DCmax, DWmax
for causingmoments
DCmax, DWmax
for causingmoments
DCmin, DWmin
for resistingmoments
EVmax
EVmin
EVmax
DD = varies
DD = varies
DD = varies
EHmax
EHmax
In the table above, causing moment and causing shear are taken to be the moment and shear causing
axial, uplift, and lateral loading respectively. Resisting is taking to mean those force effects that are
diminishing axial capacity, uplift, and lateralloading.
Page 3.5-2
Loads
Chapter 3
Page 3.6-1
Chapter 3
Page 3.6-2
Loads
Loads
Chapter 3
Page 3.7-1
Chapter 3
Page 3.7-2
Loads
Loads
Chapter 3
Load
165 lb/ft3
155 lb/ft3
150 lb/ ft3
5 lb/ft2
460 lb/ft
710 lb/ft
490 lb/ft
670 lb/ft
125 lb/ft3
140 lb/ft3
Soil, Compact
125 lb/ft3
Prestressed Concrete
165 lb/ft3
125 lb/ft3
Permanent Loads
Table 3.81
Page 3.8-1
Chapter 3
Loads
Superstructure Type
Deck Protection Systems 1 and 4:
Precast concrete, steel I or box girder with cast-inplace slab
Precast slabs with cast-in-place slab
Reinforced and post-tensioned box beams and
slabbridges
Mainline Bridges on State Routes
Deck Protection Systems 1 and 4:
Undercrossing bridge that carries traffic from a city
street or county road
Bridges with raised sidewalks
Deck Protection System 2:
Concrete Overlays
Deck Protection System 3:
HMA Overlays
Deck Protection System 5:
Segmental bridges
Bridge Decks with longitudinal or transverse posttensioning
Concrete
Cover
Overlay shown
in the plan
Future
Design
Overlay
2 (Including
wearing
surface)
None
2 HMA
2 (Including
wearing
surface)
None
None
Varies
Varies
None
Varies
Varies
None
1 (Including
wearing
surface)
1 Modified
Concrete Overlay
None
The effect of the future deck overlay on girders camber, A dimension, creep, and profile grade need not
be considered in superstructure design.
Deck overlay may be required at the time of original construction for some bridge widening or staged
construction projects if ride quality is a major concern.
Page 3.8-2
Chapter 3
Loads
Page 3.9-1
Loads
Chapter 3
B. Concrete Box Girders The load distribution factor for multi-cell cast in place concrete box girders
shall be per LRFD Specifications for interior girders from Table 4.6.2.2.2b-1 for bending moment,
and Table 4.6.2.2.3a-1 for shear. The live load distribution factor for interior girders shall then be
multiplied by the number of webs to obtain the design live load for the entire superstructure. The
correction factor for live load distribution for skewed support as specified in Tables 4.6.2.2.2e-1 for
bending moment and 4.6.2.2.3c1 for shear shall be considered.
DF = Nb x Dfi Live load distribution factor for multi-cell box girder
Where:
Dfi = Live load distribution factor for interior web
Nb = Number of webs
(3.9.4-1)
C. Multiple Presence Factors A reduction factor will be applied in the substructure design for
multiple loadings in accordance with AASHTO.
D. Distribution to Substructure The number of traffic lanes to be used in the substructure design
shall be determined bydividing the entire roadway slab width by 12. No fractional lanes shall be
used. Roadway slabwidths of less than 24 feet shall have a maximum of two design lanes.
E. Distribution to Crossbeam The HL-93 loading is distributed to the substructure by placing wheel
line reactionsina lane configuration that generates the maximum stress in the substructure. Awheel
line reaction is of the HL-93 reaction. Live loads are consideredtoact directly on the substructure
without further distribution through the superstructure as illustrated in Figure 3.91. Normally,
substructure design will not consider live load torsion or lateral distribution. Sidesway effects may
beaccounted for and are generally included in computer generated frame analysisresults.
WHEEL LINE LOADS APPLIED
TO SUPERSTRUCTURE
CROSSBEAM
Page 3.9-2
Chapter 3
Loads
For steel and prestressed concrete superstructure where the live load is transferred to substructure through
bearings, cross frames or diaphragms, the girder reaction may be used for substructure design. Live
load placement is dependent on the member under design. Some examples of live load placement are as
follows. The exterior vehicle wheel is placed 2feet from the curb for maximum crossbeam cantilever
moment or maximum eccentric foundation moment.
For crossbeam design between supports, the HL-93 lanes are placed toobtain the maximum positive
moment in the member; then re-located to obtain the maximum shear or negative momentinthe member.
For column design, the design lanes are placed to obtain the maximum transverse moment at the top of
the column; then re-located to obtain the maximum axialforce of the column.
Page 3.9-3
Loads
Page 3.9-4
Chapter 3
Loads
Chapter 3
Page 3.10-1
Chapter 3
Page 3.10-2
Loads
Loads
Chapter 3
80 mph
90 mph
100 mph
0 - 30 ft.
4 psf
5 psf
6 psf
30 - 40 ft.
6 psf
7 psf
9 psf
40 - 50 ft.
8 psf
10 psf
12 psf
80 mph
90 mph
100 mph
0 - 30 ft.
9 psf
12 psf
15 psf
30 - 40 ft.
12 psf
15 psf
19 psf
40 - 50 ft.
14 psf
18 psf
22 psf
Page 3.11-1
Chapter 3
Loads
80 mph
90 mph
100 mph
0 - 30 ft.
17 psf
21 psf
26 psf
30 - 40 ft.
19 psf
25 psf
30 psf
40 - 50 ft.
22 psf
28 psf
34 psf
80 mph
90 mph
100 mph
0 - 30 ft.
26 psf
32 psf
40 psf
30 - 40 ft.
29 psf
36 psf
45 psf
40 - 50 ft.
31 psf
39 psf
49 psf
80 mph
90 mph
100 mph
0 - 30 ft.
39 psf
50 psf
62 psf
30 - 40 ft.
43 psf
54 psf
67 psf
40 - 50 ft.
45 psf
57 psf
71 psf
V
P = PB DZ
VB
Where:
P
PB
VDZ =
VB
(3.11.1-1)
Page 3.11-2
Loads
Chapter 3
V Z
VDZ = 2.5V0 30 ln
VB Z 0
Where:
V0 =
V30 =
Z =
Z0 =
(3.11.1-2)
Exposure Categories
City (A):
Large city centers with at least 50% of the buildings having a height in excess of
70 ft. Use of this category shall be limited to those areas for which representative
terrain prevails in the upwind direction at least one-half mile. Possible channeling
effects of increased velocity pressures due to the bridge or structure's location in
the wake of adjacent structures shall be accounted for.
Suburban (B1):
Urban and suburban areas, wooded areas, or other terrain with numerous closely
spaced obstructions having the size of single-family or larger dwellings. This
category shall be limited to those areas for which representative terrain prevails
in the upwind direction at least 1,500 ft.
Sparse Suburban (B2): Urban and suburban areas with more open terrain not meeting the requirements
of Exposure B1.
Open Country (C):
Open terrain with scattered obstructions having heights generally less than 30ft.
This category includes flat open country and grasslands.
Coastal (D):
Flat unobstructed areas and water surfaces directly exposed to wind. This
category includes large bodies of water, smooth mud flats, salt flats, and
unbroken ice.
Friction Velocity
A meteorological wind characteristic taken for various upwind surface characteristics(mph).
Condition
City
Suburbs
V0 (mph)
12.0
10.9
8.2
Coastal
7.0
City
Suburbs
Z0 (ft)
8.20
3.28
0.23
Coastal
0.025
Page 3.11-3
Chapter 3
Page 3.11-4
Loads
Loads
Chapter 3
(3.12-1)
1.0
2.5
8.0
5.0
8. AASHTO LRFD Bridge design specifications shall be used for the structural design of noise
barrierwalls.
Page 3.12-1
Chapter 3
Loads
Page 3.12-2
Loads
Chapter 3
Page 3.13-1
Chapter 3
Page 3.13-2
Loads
Loads
Chapter 3
Page 3.14-1
Chapter 3
Page 3.14-2
Loads
Loads
Chapter 3
Page 3.15-1
Chapter 3
Page 3.15-2
Loads
Loads
Chapter 3
Page 3.16-1
Chapter 3
Page 3.16-2
Loads
3.99 References
1. AASHTO, LRFD Bridge Design Specifications for Design of Highway Bridges, 6th Edition 2012.
Page 3.99-1
Chapter 3
Page 3.99-2
Loads
Appendix 3.1-A1
Appendix 3.1-A1
Appendix 3.1-A1
Appendix 3.1-A1
Appendix 3.1-A1
Appendix 3.1-A1
Appendix 3.1-A1
Appendix 3.1-A1
Appendix
3.1-A1
Appendix 3.1-A1
1
2tt
1t ) (td t11 )
bt (+b dt
R= 1
2
2
2ttbt1 (+b dt
t1 )2 (td2 tt112)2
R = 2tt1 (b t ) (d2 t12)
R = 2bt
+(bdt1t)2t(2d tt12 )2
tt1+
bt
2 t t 12
1
R = 2tt (b dt
t ) 2(dt 24t11t )2 2
1 +
bt
dt
t1) (d t 1)
R = 2Rtt1=(b0.0982
R = bt + dt1 t 2d2 t1122
bt + dt1 t 4 t1
R = 0.0982
d
R = 0.0982d 44
R = 0.0982d
R = 0.0982d 4
4d 4
R =R
0.0982
d 244
=
0
.
0982
d
R = 0.0982 d 2 4d114
R
= 0.0982
d 4
R =R
0.0982
d 24
= 0.0982
d 4d1
R = 0.0982d 4
R = 0.0982d 44
R = 0.0982d
((
(
R = 1.0472t 33d
R = 1.0472t d
R = 1.0472t 3 d
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.06
July 2011
))
)
Page 2
Page 2
Page 2
Page 2
Page 2
Page 2
Page 2
Page 2
Page 2
Page 2
Page 2
Page 3.1-A1-1
Chapter 3
(d 2t 33dd1 )
R =R0=.0982
1.0472
R = 1.0472t d
R = 1.0472t 33d
R = 1.0472t d
R = 1.0472t 3 d
R = 1.0472t 3 d
0472dt334d4
RR
== 01..1406
1406tdd
RR ==10.0472
R = 0.1406d 44
R = 0.1406d
R = 0.1406d 44
R = 0.1406d
R = 0.1406d 4
R = 0.1406
d 4 b 4
16
b
3
bd1 4 b 4
RR == ab
3
.
36
3 16
R
=
0
.
1406
ab 3 3.36a 14 12a4 44
R3 = 0.1406
b d
b
16
R = ab 33 16
3.36 ab 1 12ba4 4
R = ab 16
3 3.36 ba 1 12ba4 4
3 3.36 ba 1 12
R = ab 33 16
b a4
R = ab 3 3.36 a 1 12a4 44
163
ba
b a
12
R = ab 3 16 3.363 b31 b 44
a 3ab 31 12a
R = ab 3 3R =
3.36
3R = 2 a3abb32 12ba44 4
3 16
2a+ b
R = ab 16 3a.36
b 4
+3 babb3211 12
a
R = ab 3 3R = 3a.36
a4
2
2 3 3
3R = aa2a++3babb32 12a
R = 2a b 2
R = a2 +
3 b
3
aa +3bb3 2
R = 2 a b 2
R = a 2 +3b 32
aa+3 3bb3
RR == 2
a b
RR==a222r+r 3tbt22
R =a2+r 3b3t
R = 22r t2
2tb
R
r2 d3d3t 2
RR===222tb
R = 2tb
b+2r2dddt22
RRR=== 22btb
++
r23ddt 2
b
b
R =22tb+rd3dt
R = 2tb 2 d3 2
RR== b2+rd3 t
R = 2b+r dt
4b 2 d 2
R = 4b22 d22
R = b+
4b2d2d 2 b
RR== b +4b2dd+ b
bb++t22d2d +2 btb1
4tb d+ t
R = t4tb 2 d +2 tt11
R = b + 2d b1
b + 2d + b
+t
t
t 4 t11
a
R = a44
R = 2aa 4 b
RR== 2aa+ b
22ata +4 btb1
t a+ t
R = tt a+4 tt11
R = 2a b1
2a + b
t + t1
t
t1
Loads
Page
Page33
Page 3
Page 3
Page 3
Page 3
Page 3
Page 3
Page 3
Page 3
r
2
4r r + 2a 22
4r 2r + 2a
R = 44rr 2r ++22aa
R = 2a +2r 2r 2
r r + 2r 2
RR== 4r22a+2
rr++22atr
22a2a+t+
4r t 2 r+++2a2t11r
R=
2
R = 2at+t r t2t1r1
+
2
a
r + 2r Manual
WSDOT Bridge
+ t1
t Design
t
t1
2
2
22
Page 3.1-A1-2
M 23-50.06
July 2011
rr 1
2
44rr2 ++ 22aa 2
22
2
RR == 4r22rr + 2a
+
2
a
r
2
r
4r2a + 2r+ 2a2r
2 ++ 2
=
R
R = 22at+t
tt1
r
42ra + rr++22a2r1r 2
2
2r +
R = 4r tt + 2ta1t1
2a + 2r 2r
R=
+
2a t+ r 2t1r
+
t
t
2 2 1
22bb2 dd2
RR ==
bb 2 dd2
22bb2++dd2
R
=
R = ttbbb ttddd
b +2 d2
2b+ d
R = ttbb 2 ttdd2
b2b dd
R= +
t44bbbb2+2ddtd2d2
=
R
R=
bb t4bb2222dddt2d2 bb
4++b d ++
RR== ttbbb a 2t2t2bddd22 ttb11
R = b +a2d2b 2+ b
R = a +4b2bt d2+ ct
R = ttbba ++
at 2b2bd +22 tc1
RR == tba 4abt2dbdbd+t c1b
R = ataa + btbb + ctcc
++ 2t d++ tb
tbb +
ttaa ttbdb +ttcc1
t b t d t1
Loads
(a + c ) 2d 22
R = (a a+22cb)22 d
RR== aa++22bb22 c2c2
(aa + cb)+d c
RR == (at++ c ) ++dt1
taaaa ++t22tbbbb tctccc1
++
tt
tt11
2
Chapter 3
Page 44
Page
Page44
Page
Page 4
Page 4
Multi-Celled Sections
Multi-Celled Sections
Torsion of two or more cells connect at the walls is a statically indeterminate problem. The
Torsion of two or more cells connect at the walls is a statically indeterminate problem. The
Multi-Celled
Multi-Celled Sections
Sections
general method to find the torsional rigidity, R, is as follows:
b11t1133 + 3b22 t 2233
general method to find the torsional rigidity, R, is as follows:
Torsion
of
two
or
more
cells
connect at the walls is a statically indeterminate problem. The
R
=
Torsion of two or more cells connect at the walls is a statically indeterminate problem. The
3
general method to find the torsional rigidity, R, is as follows:
general method to find the torsional rigidity, R, is as follows:
Multi-Celled Sections
Torsion of two or more cells connect at the walls is a statically indeterminate problem. The
general method to find the torsional rigidity, R, is as follows:
t
The equation for equilibrium for n cells is:
M t = 2i
qi i
(1)
=1
n
WSDOT Bridge Design
Manual M 23-50.06
Page 3.1-A1-3
i n=1
M
qqi
(1)
July 2011
Where q
Mt == 22 i is the shear flow in cell i and
i
(1)i is the area enclosed by the center line of the walls
t
i
i
is the shear flow in cell i and
Where q
i is the area enclosed by the center line of the walls
ii==i11
inclosing the cell, and M
t is the twisting moment applied to the cell.
Chapter 3
Loads
Multi-Celled Sections
Torsion of two or more cells connect at the walls is a statically indeterminate problem. The general
method to find the torsional rigidity, R, is as follows:
M t = 2 q i i
i =1
(3.1-A1-1)
Where qi is the shear flow in cell i and i is the area enclosed by the center line of the walls inclosing
the cell, and Mt is the twisting moment applied to the cell.
The equations of consistent deformation
are:
The equations of consistent deformation are:
Where:ji i
jj j
jk k
j
1
S ji = S ji dst
1
G
S ji = S ji dst
1
G
S jj = S jj dst
1
G
S jj = S jj dst
The equations of consistent deformation are:
1
G
S jk = S jk dst
S ji qi + S jj q j + S jk 1q k = 2 j
G
S =
S ds
1 jk ds G jk t
The equations of consistent deformation are:
S ji =
S ji t
G is the shear modulus of elasticity
S ji qi + SGjj q j + S jk q k = 2 j
The equations of consistent deformation are:
G1is G is the shear modulus of elasticity
the shear modulus of elasticity
S ji dst is the sum of the length of cell wall, common to cells j and i, divided by its thic
1 jj qSj +dsdsdsS jk q k = 2 j
S
q
+
S
S
=
ji
i
jj
jj
is
the
sum
of
the
length
of cell wall, common to cells j and i, divided by its thickness
t
S ji = G SS jiji t is the sum of the length of cell wall, common to cells j and i, divided by its thickness
ds
t
G1
S
jk t is the sum of the length of cell wall, common to cells j and k, divided by its thi
1 SS ji dsds
ds
S
=
1
ji
the sum of the lengthdsof cell wall, common to cells j and k, divided by its thickness
is the sum of the length of cell wall, common to cells j and k, divided by its thickness
GSSjjjkjkdst ttt is
SS jjjk == G
S jj t is the sum of the length of cell wall, common to cell j, divided by their respecti
G1
ds
S
is the sum of the length of cell wall, common
toj,cell
j, divided by their respective
ds
of cell wall, common to cell
divided
by their respective thicknesses.
thicknesses.
S jj = 1 S jjjj dstt is the sum of the length
S jk = G thicknesses.
S jk t
G is the shear modulus of elasticity
is the angle of twist in radians
G is the angle of twist in radians
ds 1
ds
Equation (2) will yield n equations for n unknown shear flows and can be solved for the shear
S
Loads
Chapter 3
Equation 3.1-A1-2 will yield n equations for n unknown shear flows and can be solved for the shear
flows qi in terms for G and the angle of twist . Knowing i and i the torsional constant R may
becalculatedfrom:
R=
2
G
q
i =1
(3.1-A1-3)
A simplification of this method is to assume that the interior web members are not effective in torsion.
The torsional constant may be approximated by:
R=
4 A2
S
i t i
i
(3.1-A1-4)
Where:
A Is the area enclosed by the centerline of the exterior webs and the top andbottom slabs
Si Is the length of side i
ti Is the thickness of side i
Page 3.1-A1-5
Chapter 3
Page 3.1-A1-6
Loads
Appendix 3.1-B1
1 Introduction
The purpose of this example is to demonstrate a methodology of analyzing a bridge pier
for the HL-93 live load. This analysis consists of two plane frame analyzes. The first
analysis is a longitudinal analysis of the superstructure. This analysis produces reactions
at the intermediate piers, which are applied to a plane frame model of the pier.
2 Bridge Description
100'-0"
140'-0"
100'-0"
Elevation
Material
Girders: f'c = 7 KSI
Elsewhere: f'c = 4 KSI
9'-0"
W74G
3 spa @ 8'=0"
5'-0"
40 ft
5'-0"
7 ft
14 ft
7 ft
3 Analysis Goals
The purpose of this analysis is to determine the following live load actions in the top and
bottom of the column and in the footing:
Maximum axial force and corresponding moments
Maximum moments and corresponding axial force
Maximum shears
Additionally the following live load actions will be computed for controlling design
points in the cross beam
Maximum moment
Maximum shear
4 Material Properties
Lets begin the analysis by determining the material properties.
Page 3.1-B1-1
Chapter 3
Loads
Code
Reference
4.1 Girders
f c
E c 33,000 w1c .5
wc = 0.160 KCF
fc = 7 KSI
1.5
E c 33,0000.160 7 5588 KSI
4.2 Slab, Columns and Cross Beam
f c
E c 33,000 w1c .5
wc = 0.160 KCF
fc = 4 KSI
1.5
E c 33,0000.160
4 4224 KSI
5 Section Properties
Compute the geometric properties of the girder, columns, and cap beam.
5.1 Girder
The composite girder section properties can be obtained from the Section Properties
Calculator in QConBridge.
A 1254.6in 2
I 1007880in 3
5.2 Column
Properties of an individual column can be obtained by simple formula
2
5 ft 12 inft
d2
A
2827in 2
4
4
4
4
5 ft 12 inft
d
I
636172in 4
64
64
For longitudinal analysis we need to proportion the column stiffness to match the
stiffness of a single girder line. Four girder lines framing into a two column bent produce
a rotation and axial deflection under a unit load, the stiffness of the column member in
the longitudinal analysis model needs to be 25% of that of the bent to produce the same
rotation and deflection under 25% of the load.
For longitudinal analysis the section properties of the column member are
2 columns 2827in 2 per column 1413in 2
A
4 girder lines
Page 3.1-B1-2
4 girder lines
Loads
Chapter 3
Code
Reference
NOTE
For columns of other shapes, and for skewed bents, the properties of the columns need
to be computed in the plane of the longitudinal frame, and the plane of the bent for use
in each analysis respectively.
1
1
4
3
w h 3 5 ft 9 ft 20736 inft 4 6283008in 4
12
12
6 Longitudinal Analysis
The purpose of this analysis, initially, is to determine the maximum live load reactions
that will be applied to the bent. After a transverse analysis is performed, the results from
this analysis will be scaled by the number of loaded lanes causing maximum responses in
the bent and distributed to individual columns.
The longitudinal analysis consists of applying various combinations of design lane and
design trucks. The details can be found in LRFD 3.6
3.6
6.1 Loading
Now comes the tricky part. How do you configure and position the design vehicles to
produce maximum reactions? Where do you put the dual truck train, and what headway
spacing do you use to maximize the desired force effects? If we look at influence lines for
axial force, moment, and shear at the top and bottom of the column, the loading
configuration becomes apparent.
6 .1 .1 Influence Lines
The figures below are influence lines for axial force, shear, and moment at the top of Pier
2 for a unit load moving along a girder line. The influence lines for the bottom of the pier
will be exactly the same, except the moment influence will be different by an amount
equal to the shear times the pier height.
Page 3.1-B1-3
Chapter 3
Loads
Code
Reference
Axial
0 .20
0 .00
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
250
300
350
400
250
300
350
400
-0 .20
-0 .40
-0 .60
-0 .80
-1 .00
-1 .20
Shear
0 .40
0 .30
0 .20
0 .10
0 .00
-0 .10
50
100
150
200
-0 .20
-0 .30
-0 .40
-0 .50
-0 .60
Moment
8 .00
6 .00
4 .00
2 .00
0 .00
-2 .00
50
100
150
200
-4 .00
-6 .00
-8 .00
-10 .00
To achieve the maximum compressive reaction, the lane load needs to be in spans 1 and
2, and the dual truck need to straddle the pier and be as close to each other as possible.
That is, the minimum headway spacing of 50 feet will maximize the compressive
reaction.
Maximum shears and moments occur under two conditions. First, spans 1 and 3 are
loaded with the lane load and the dual truck train. The headway spacing that causes the
maximum response is in the range of 180 200 feet. Second, span 2 is loaded with the
lane load and the dual truck train. The headway spacing is at its minimum value of 50 ft.
Page 3.1-B1-4
Loads
Chapter 3
Code
Reference
Analytically finding the exact location and headway spacing of the trucks for the extreme
force effects is possible, but hardly worth the effort. Structural analysis tools with a
moving load generator, such as GTSTRUDL, can be used to quickly determine the
maximum force effects.
6.2 Results
A longitudinal analysis is performed using GTSTRUDL. The details of this analysis
are shown in Appendix A.
The outcome of the longitudinal analysis consists of dual truck train and lane load results.
These results need to be combined to produce the complete live load response. The
complete response is computed as QLL IM 0.9IM Dual Truck Train Lane Load .
3.6.1.3.1
The dynamic load allowance (impact factor) is given by the LRFD specifications as 33%.
Note that the dynamic load allowance need not be applied to foundation components
entirely below ground level. This causes us to combine the dual truck train and lane
responses for cross beams and columns differently than for footings, piles, and shafts.
3.6.2.1
Maximum Axial
Axial (K/LANE)
-117.9 (Loading
1014)
-89.1 (Loading
LS12)
-221.3
-186.3
Lane Load
LL+IM (Column)
LL+IM (Footing)
Top of Pier
Corresponding
Moment (KFT/LANE)
-146.2
Bottom of Pier
Corresponding
Moment (KFT/LANE)
103.4
-195.5
141.9
-350.9
N/A
251.5
220.8
Corresponding Axial
(K/LANE)
-85.8
-49.4
-147.2
N/A
Page 3.1-B1-5
Chapter 3
Loads
Code
Reference
Maximum Shear
Dual Truck Train
Lane Load
LL+IM (Column)
LL+IM (Footing)
Shear (K/LANE)
21.8 (Loading 1018)
13.6 (Loading LS2)
38.3
31.9
Corresponding Axial
(K/LANE)
-85.8
-49.4
-147.2
-121.7
7 Transverse Analysis
Now that we have the maximum lane reactions from the longitudinal girder line analysis,
we need to apply these as loads to the bent frame.
7.1 Loading
The methodology for applying superstructure live load reactions to substructure elements
is described in the BDM. This methodology consists of applying the wheel line reactions
directly to the crossbeam and varying the number and position of design lanes. Appendix
B describes modeling techniques for GTSTRUDL.
BDM
9.1.1.1C
7.2 Results
7 .2 .1 Cap Beam
For this example, we will look at results for three design points, the left and right face of
the left-hand column, and at the mid-span of the cap beam. Note that in the analysis, the
wheel line reactions were applied from the left hand side of the bent. This does not result
in a symmetrical set of loadings. However, because this is a symmetrical frame we expect
symmetrical results. The controlling results from the left and right hand points A and
B are used.
Page 3.1-B1-6
Loads
Chapter 3
Code
Reference
For the shear design of the crossbeam, the LRFD specifications allow us to determine the
C5.8.3.4.2
effects of moments and shears on the capacity of the section using the maximum factored
moments and shears at a section. Hence, the results below do not show the maximum
shears and corresponding moments.
The tables below summarize the results of the transverse analysis for the crossbeam. The
basic results are adjusted with the multiple presence factors. The controlling load cases
are in parentheses.
Point A
Force Effect
Multiple Presence
Factor
LL+IM
Point B
Force Effect
Multiple Presence
Factor
LL+IM
Shear (K)
110.7 (Loading
1009)
1.2
1.2
132.8
-581.2
Shear (K)
155.8 (Loading
2330)
1.0
+Moment (K-FT)
314.3 (Loading
1522)
1.2
-Moment (K-FT)
-650.9 (Loading
1029)
1.2
155.8
377.2
-781.1
Page 3.1-B1-7
Chapter 3
Loads
Code
Reference
Point C
Force Effect
Multiple Presence
Factor
LL+IM
Shear (K)
+Moment (K-FT)
87.9 (Loading 2036) 426.4 (Loading
1520)
1.0
1.2
-Moment (K-FT)
-400.5 (Loading
1029)
1.2
87.9
-480.6
511.7
7 .2 .2 Columns
The tables below show the live load results at the top and bottom of a column. The results
are factored with the appropriate multiple presence factors. Controlling loads are in
parentheses.
Maximum Axial
Axial (K)
Force Effect
Multiple Presence
Factor
LL+IM
-347.6 (Loading
2026)
1.0
-347.6
Top of Column
Corresponding
Moment (K-FT)
34.1
Bottom of Column
Corresponding
Moment (K-FT)
28.4
1.0
1.0
34.1
28.4
Maximum Shear
Force Effect
Multiple Presence Factor
LL+IM
Shear (K)
-1.0 (Loading 1029)
1.2
-1.2
7 .2 .3 Footings
Even though we didnt perform the transverse analysis with the footing loads, we can still
obtain the results. Assuming we have a linear elastic system, the principle of
Page 3.1-B1-8
Loads
Chapter 3
Code
Reference
superposition can be used. The footing results are simply the column results scaled by the
ratio of the footing load to the column load. For this case, the scale factor is
186.3221.3=0.84.
Maximum Axial
LL+IM
Maximum Moment
Axial (K)
-292
Corresponding
Moment (K-FT)
23.9
LL+IM
Moment (K-FT)
-45.0
Maximum Shear
LL+IM
Shear (K)
-1.0
Before we can combine the force effects we need to determine the per column force
effect from the longitudinal analysis. To do this, we look at the axial force results in
transverse model to determine the lane fraction that is applied to each column.
For maximum axial load, 2 lanes at 221.3 K/LANE produce an axial force of 347.6 K.
The lane fraction carried by the column is 347.6/(2*221.3) = 0.785 (78.5%).
Mz = (-350.9 K-FT/LANE)(2 LANES)(0.785)(1.0) = -550.9 K-FT (Top of Column)
Mz = (251.5 K-FT/LANE)(2 LANES)(0.785)(1.0) = 394.9 K-FT (Bottom of Column)
Mz = (220.8 K-FT/LANE)(2 LANES)(0.785)(1.0) = 346.7 K-FT (Footing)
For maximum moment (and shear because the same loading governs) at the top of the
column, 1 lane at 221.3 K/LANE produces an axial force of 318.7. (318.7/221.3 = 1.44).
144% of the lane reaction is carried by the column.
Mz = (-1025.0)(1.44)(1.2) = -1771.2 K-FT
Vx = (38.3)(1.44)(1.2) = 66.2 K (Column)
Vx = (31.9)(1.44)(1.2) = 55.1 K (Footing)
For maximum moment at the bottom of the column, 1 lane at 221.3 K/LANE produces an
axial force of 64.3 K.(64.3/221.3 = 0.29) 29% of the lane reaction is carried by the
column.
Mz = (506.1)(0.29)(1.2) = 176.1 K-FT (Column)
Mz = (420.7)(0.29)(1.2) = 146.4 K-FT (Footing)
Page 3.1-B1-9
Chapter 3
Loads
Code
Reference
Ahead on Station
Py = Compression < 0
Mz
Vz
Mx
Vx
Column
-347.6
Maximum
Axial
Bottom
-347.6
Load Case
Maximum
Moment
Top
- 318.7
Maximum
Moment
Bottom
66.7
34.1
28.4
71.2
-64.3
-550.9
394.9
-1771.2
176.1
Maximum
Axial Top
Axial
(K)
Mx (KFT)
Mz (KFT)
Vx (K)
Vz (K)
Footing
Maximum
Axial
Axial
(K)
Mx (KFT)
Mz (KFT)
Vx (K)
Vz (K)
-292
Load Cases
Maximum
Moment
Bottom
46.7
23.9
-45.0
346.7
146.4
Shear
66.2
-1.2
Shear
72.7
-1.0
9 Skew Effects
This analysis becomes only slightly more complicated when the pier is skewed with
respect to the centerline of the bridge. The results of the longitudinal analysis need to be
adjusted for skew before being applied to the transverse model.
Page 3.1-B1-10
Loads
Chapter 3
Code
Reference
The shears and moments produced by the longitudinal analysis are in the plane of the
longitudinal model. These force vectors have components that are projected into the
plane of the transverse model as show in the figure below. The transverse model loading
must include these forces and moments for each wheel line load. Likewise, the skew
adjusted results from the longitudinal analysis need to be used when combining results
from the transverse analysis.
Vx
My
Vy
V
Mx
10 Summary
This example demonstrates a method for analyzing bridge piers subjected to the LRFD
HL-93 live load. Other than the loading, the analysis procedure is the same as for the
AASHTO Standard Specifications.
Page 3.1-B1-11
Page 3.1-B1-12
TIME
SECOND
--------------------------------------------------------This is the Common Startup Macro; put your company-wide startup commands here.
You can edit this file from Tools -- Macros. Click "Startup" and then "Edit".
---------------------------------------------------------
TEMPERATURE
FAHRENHEIT
$
$
$
$
ANGLE
RADIAN
>
>
>
>
WEIGHT
POUND
COMPLETION NO.
4290
1}
2}
3}
4}
LENGTH
INCH
VERSION
26.0
{
{
{
{
*** G T S T R U D L ***
RELEASE DATE
February, 2002
Chapter 3
Loads
Code
Reference
>_Analysis of Piers\Longitudinal.gti'
> $ --------------------------------------------------------> $ Live Load Pier Analysis Example
> $ Longitudinal Anaysis to determine maximum lane reactions
> $ --------------------------------------------------------> $
> STRUDL
{
{
{
{
{
{
9}
10}
11}
12}
13}
14}
>
>
>
>
>
>
LENGTH
INCH
ANGLE
RADIAN
X coord
WEIGHT
POUND
Y coord
TEMPERATURE
FAHRENHEIT
TIME
SECOND
********************************************************************
*
*
*
******
G T S T R U D L
*
* ********
*
* **
**
*
* **
***** ****** *****
** ** *****
**
*
* ** ********** ****** ****** ****** ** ** ****** **
*
* ** ********** **
**
** ** ** ** ** ** **
*
* **
****
*****
**
****** ** ** ** ** **
*
* **********
*****
**
*****
** ** ** ** **
*
*
****** **
**
**
** **
** ** ** ** **
*
*
**
******
**
** ** ****** ****** ****** *
*
**
*****
**
** **
****
*****
****** *
*
**
*
*
**
OWNED BY AND PROPRIETARY TO THE
*
*
**
GEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION
*
*
*
* RELEASE DATE
VERSION
COMPLETION NO.
*
* February, 2002
26.0
4290
*
*
*
********************************************************************
2}
3}
4}
5}
6}
7}
8}
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
Loads
Chapter 3
Code
Reference
Page 3.1-B1-13
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
15}
16}
17}
18}
19}
20}
21}
22}
23}
24}
25}
26}
27}
28}
29}
30}
31}
32}
33}
34}
35}
36}
37}
38}
39}
40}
41}
42}
43}
44}
45}
46}
47}
48}
49}
50}
51}
52}
53}
54}
55}
56}
57}
58}
59}
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Page 3.1-B1-14
-------1
2
3
4
5
6
------------0.00000
100.00000
240.00000
340.00000
100.00000
240.00000
-----------0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
-40.00000 S
-40.00000 S
CONSTANTS
E 5588 MEMBERS 1 TO 3
E 4224 MEMBERS 4 TO 5
$
$ ------------- Loadings -----------------UNITS KIP FEET
$
$ --- Lane Loads --LOADING 'LS12' 'Load load in span 1 and 2'
MEMBER 1 2 LOAD FORCE Y UNIFORM FRAcTIONAL -0.640 LA 0.0 LB 1.0
$
$
$ ------------- Boundary conditions ------$ --- Roller joints: rotation + horiz. translation
DEFINE GROUP 'roller' ADD JOINTS 1 4
STATUS SUPPORT JOINT GROUP 'roller'
JOINT GRP 'roller' RELEASES FORCE X MOM Z
$
MEMBER INCIDENCES
$
Name Start joint End joint
$ ---------------------1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
5
2
5
6
3
$
$ ------------- Properties ---------------UNITS INCHES
MEMBER PROPERTIES
1 TO 3 AX 1255 IZ 1007880
4 TO 5 AX 1413 IZ 318086
Chapter 3
Loads
Code
Reference
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
60}
61}
62}
63}
64}
65}
66}
67}
68}
69}
70}
71}
72}
73}
74}
75}
76}
77}
78}
79}
80}
81}
82}
83}
84}
85}
86}
87}
88}
89}
90}
91}
92}
93}
94}
95}
96}
97}
98}
99}
100}
101}
102}
103}
104}
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
205'
$ --- TRIAL 2 - (GOAL: Determine extreme values using refined headway spacing)
$ --- Load ID Legend
Loads
Chapter 3
Code
Reference
Page 3.1-B1-15
Page 3.1-B1-16
14.0 32.0 14.0 8.0
Chapter 3
Loads
Code
Reference
DEGF SEC
0.000
1.000
FR
DISTANCE
FROM START
5.504462
6047
-117.8832
1014
5.504462
6047
-117.8832
1014
21.75733
1018
-17.13201
3024
21.75733
1018
-17.13201
3024
287.7058
1018
-225.8802
3024
459.4002
3024
-582.5873
1018
------------------/
Z BENDING
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------MEMBER 4
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RAD
ACTIVE UNITS
PROBLEM - NONE
****************************
*RESULTS OF LATEST ANALYSES*
****************************
TIME TO PROCESS
6 JOINT DISPLACEMENTS
0.02 SECONDS
TIME TO PROCESS
5 ELEMENT DISTORTIONS
0.04 SECONDS
TIME FOR STATICS CHECK
0.01 SECONDS
{ 142} > $
{ 143} > $ ------------- Results
{ 144} > $
{ 145} > OUTPUT BY MEMBER
{ 146} >
{ 147} > $ ----------- Dual Truck Results Envelope (top and bottom of pier)
{ 148} > LOAD LIST 1000 TO 7999
{ 149} > LIST FORCE ENVELOPE MEMBER 4 SECTION FRACTIONAL NS 2 1.0 0.0
Loads
Chapter 3
Code
Reference
Page 3.1-B1-17
Page 3.1-B1-18
>
> $ ----------- Lane Load Results Envelope (top and bottom of pier)
> LOAD LIST 'LS12' 'LS13' 'LS2' 'LS3'
> LIST FORCE ENVELOPE MEMBER 4 SECTION FRACTIONAL NS 2 1.0 0.0
FEET KIP
RAD
DEGF SEC
ACTIVE UNITS
PROBLEM - NONE
****************************
*RESULTS OF LATEST ANALYSES*
****************************
150}
151}
152}
153}
{
{
{
FR
3.302270
LS3
-89.14960
LS12
3.302270
LS3
-89.14960
LS12
13.59967
LS2
-10.33223
LS13
13.59967
LS2
-10.33223
LS13
154} >
155} > $ ----------- Corresponding force effects maximum axial, shear, and moment
156} > LOAD LIST 1014 1018 'LS12' 'LS2'
0.000
1.000
DISTANCE
FROM START
179.7457
LS2
-136.5602
LS13
276.7290
LS13
-364.2411
LS2
------------------/
Z BENDING
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------MEMBER 4
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
{
{
{
{
Chapter 3
Loads
Code
Reference
RAD
DEGF SEC
ACTIVE UNITS
PROBLEM - NONE
****************************
*RESULTS OF LATEST ANALYSES*
****************************
157} > LIST SECTION FORCES MEMBER 4 SECTION FRACTIONAL NS 2 1.0 0.0
LOADING
FR
FR
LOADING
DISTANCE
1.000
0.000
DISTANCE
FROM START
1.000
0.000
DISTANCE
FROM START
LOADING
8.433558
8.433558
13.59967
13.59967
FORCE
USERS TRUCK
/-------------------
1014
-49.40132
-49.40132
PIVOT ON SECTION
MEMBER 2
-------------------//------------------
FORWARD
MOMENT
LS2
-89.14960
-89.14960
LS12
------------------/
-364.2411
179.7458
------------------/
Z BENDING
-195.4770
141.8653
------------------/
Z BENDING
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------MEMBER 4
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Loads
Chapter 3
Code
Reference
Page 3.1-B1-19
Page 3.1-B1-20
LOADING
FR
1.000
0.000
FR
DISTANCE
FROM START
1.000
0.000
FROM START
USERS TRUCK
6.239560
6.239560
Y SHEAR
FORWARD
TORSION
PIVOT ON SECTION
Z SHEAR
MEMBER 2
Y BENDING
-85.84380
-85.84380
21.75733
21.75733
1018
-117.8832
-117.8832
AXIAL
-582.5874
287.7058
------------------/
Z BENDING
-146.2155
103.3669
Z BENDING
Chapter 3
Loads
Code
Reference
{
1}
{
2}
here.
{
3}
"Edit".
{
4}
LENGTH
INCH
WEIGHT
POUND
VERSION
26.0
ANGLE
RADIAN
TEMPERATURE
FAHRENHEIT
COMPLETION NO.
4290
TIME
SECOND
> $ ---------------------------------------------------------
> $ --------------------------------------------------------> $ This is the Common Startup Macro; put your company-wide startup commands
*** G T S T R U D L ***
RELEASE DATE
February, 2002
Loads
Chapter 3
Code
Reference
The GTSTRUDL live load generator uses partial trucks when it is bring a truck onto or
taking it off a bridge. As such, less then the full number of axles are applied to the model.
For the transverse analysis, we do not want to consider the situation when only one of the
two wheel lines is on the model. As such, several load cases are ignored by way of the
LOAD LIST command on line76 of the output.
Page 3.1-B1-21
Page 3.1-B1-22
> CINPUT 'C:\Documents and Settings\bricer\My Documents\BDM\HL93 Live Load >_Analysis of Piers\Transverse.gti'
> $ --------------------------------------------------------> $ Live Load Pier Analysis Example
> $ Transverse Anaysis to determine column loads
> $ --------------------------------------------------------> $
> STRUDL
{
{
{
{
9}
10}
11}
12}
>
>
>
>
LENGTH
INCH
WEIGHT
POUND
ANGLE
RADIAN
TEMPERATURE
FAHRENHEIT
TIME
SECOND
********************************************************************
*
*
*
******
G T S T R U D L
*
* ********
*
* **
**
*
* **
***** ****** *****
** ** *****
**
*
* ** ********** ****** ****** ****** ** ** ****** **
*
* ** ********** **
**
** ** ** ** ** ** **
*
* **
****
*****
**
****** ** ** ** ** **
*
* **********
*****
**
*****
** ** ** ** **
*
*
****** **
**
**
** **
** ** ** ** **
*
*
**
******
**
** ** ****** ****** ****** *
*
**
*****
**
** **
****
*****
****** *
*
**
*
*
**
OWNED BY AND PROPRIETARY TO THE
*
*
**
GEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION
*
*
*
* RELEASE DATE
VERSION
COMPLETION NO.
*
* February, 2002
26.0
4290
*
*
*
********************************************************************
1}
2}
3}
4}
5}
6}
7}
8}
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
Chapter 3
Loads
Code
Reference
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
13}
14}
15}
16}
17}
18}
19}
20}
21}
22}
23}
24}
25}
26}
27}
28}
29}
30}
31}
32}
33}
34}
35}
36}
37}
38}
39}
40}
41}
42}
43}
44}
45}
46}
47}
48}
49}
50}
51}
52}
53}
54}
55}
56}
57}
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
$
JOINT COORDINATES
$
Name
X coord
Y coord
$ ------------------------------1
-14.00000
40.00000
2
-7.00000
40.00000
3
7.00000
40.00000
4
14.00000
40.00000
5
-7.00000
0.00000 S
6
7.00000
0.00000 S
$
$
MEMBER INCIDENCES
$
Name Start joint End joint
$ ---------------------1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
5
2
5
6
3
$
$ ------------- Properties ---------------UNITS INCHES
MEMBER PROPERTIES
1 TO 3 AX 64935 IZ 6283008 $ CAP BEAM
4 TO 5 AX 2827 IZ 636172 $ COLUMNS
UNITS FEET
$
$ ------------- Loadings -----------------$
MOVING LOAD GENERATOR
SUPERSTRUCTURE FOR MEMBERS 1 TO 3
Loads
Chapter 3
Code
Reference
Page 3.1-B1-23
Page 3.1-B1-24
PROBLEM - NONE
****************************
*RESULTS OF LATEST ANALYSES*
****************************
{
58} >
{
59} > $ Two lanes loaded - Left Aligned
{
60} > TRUCK FWD GENERAL TRUCK NP 5 110.7 6 110.7 6 110.7 6 110.7 0.875 0.0001
{
61} > GENERATE LOAD INITIAL 2000 PRINT OFF
{
62} >
{
63} > $ Two lanes loaded - Center Aligned
{
64} > TRUCK FWD GENERAL TRUCK NP 5 110.7 6 110.7 6 110.7 6 110.7 2.125 0.00001
{
65} > GENERATE LOAD INITIAL 2300 PRINT OFF
{
66} >
{
67} > $ Two lanes loaded - Right Aligned
{
68} > TRUCK FWD GENERAL TRUCK NP 5 110.7 6 110.7 6 110.7 6 110.7 3.125 0.0001
{
69} > GENERATE LOAD INITIAL 2500 PRINT OFF
{
70} >
{
71} > END LOAD GENERATOR
*** OUT OF MOVING LOAD GENERATOR
{
72} > $
{
73} > $ -------------- Analysis
{
74} > $
{
75} > $ --- Keep active only those loads where all of the "axles" are on the structure
{
76} > LOAD LIST 1009 TO 1029 1311 TO 1330 1513 TO 1531 2026 TO 2037 2328 TO 2338 2530 TO 2539
{
77} > STIFFNESS ANALYSIS
TIME FOR CONSISTENCY CHECKS FOR
5 MEMBERS
0.00 SECONDS
TIME FOR BANDWIDTH REDUCTION
0.00 SECONDS
TIME TO GENERATE
5 ELEMENT STIF. MATRICES
0.00 SECONDS
TIME TO PROCESS
345 MEMBER LOADS
0.01 SECONDS
TIME TO ASSEMBLE THE STIFFNESS MATRIX
0.00 SECONDS
TIME TO PROCESS
6 JOINTS
0.00 SECONDS
TIME TO SOLVE WITH
1 PARTITIONS
0.00 SECONDS
TIME TO PROCESS
6 JOINT DISPLACEMENTS
0.01 SECONDS
TIME TO PROCESS
5 ELEMENT DISTORTIONS
0.00 SECONDS
TIME FOR STATICS CHECK
0.00 SECONDS
{
78} > $
{
79} > $ ------------- Results
{
80} > $
{
81} > $ CAP BEAM RESULTS (FACE OF COLUMN AND CENTERLINE BEAM)
{
82} > LIST FORCE ENVELOPE MEMBER 1 SECTION NS 1 4.5
Chapter 3
Loads
Code
Reference
FEET KIP
RAD
DEGF SEC
FEET KIP
RAD
DEGF SEC
ACTIVE UNITS
PROBLEM - NONE
****************************
*RESULTS OF LATEST ANALYSES*
****************************
0.0000000E+00
1009
0.0000000E+00
1010
0.4612272E-11
2539
-401.2880
1009
------------------/
Z BENDING
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------MEMBER 2
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4.500
DISTANCE
FROM START
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------MEMBER 1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTIVE UNITS
Loads
Chapter 3
Code
Reference
Page 3.1-B1-25
Page 3.1-B1-26
1.064582
1029
-0.7828730
1021
11.500
155.8126
2034
-44.21778
1009
87.92229
2036
-87.92228
2328
FEET KIP
RAD
DEGF SEC
ACTIVE UNITS
PROBLEM - NONE
****************************
*RESULTS OF LATEST ANALYSES*
****************************
1.064582
1029
-0.7828730
1021
7.000
55.64646
1029
-155.8126
2330
301.1816
1022
-650.9821
1029
426.4992
1520
-400.5730
1029
314.3994
1522
-522.0231
1009
------------------/
Z BENDING
DISTANCE
FROM START
------------------/
Z BENDING
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------MEMBER 3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.064582
1029
-0.7828730
1021
2.500
DISTANCE
FROM START
Chapter 3
Loads
Code
Reference
FEET KIP
RAD
DEGF SEC
ACTIVE UNITS
PROBLEM - NONE
****************************
*RESULTS OF LATEST ANALYSES*
****************************
85} >
86} > $ COLUMN TOP AND BOTTOM RESULTS
87} > LIST FORCE ENVELOPE MEMBER 4 SECTION FRACTIONAL NS 2 1.0 0.0
0.1944455E-10
2037
0.0000000E+00
1010
0.7038116E-05
2533
-484.3125
1029
0.000
1.000
FR
DISTANCE
FROM START
55.64646
1029
-347.5455
2026
55.64646
1029
-347.5455
2026
0.7828730
1021
-1.064582
1029
0.7828730
1021
-1.064582
1029
28.35656
2026
-53.63107
1029
59.30810
1009
-27.00405
2539
------------------/
Z BENDING
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------MEMBER 4
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
{
{
{
2.500
Loads
Chapter 3
Code
Reference
Page 3.1-B1-27
Page 3.1-B1-28
>
>
>
>
>
>
FEET KIP
RAD
DEGF SEC
ACTIVE UNITS
PROBLEM - NONE
****************************
*RESULTS OF LATEST ANALYSES*
****************************
88}
89}
90}
91}
92}
93}
LOADING
FR
1.000
0.000
FR
DISTANCE
FROM START
1.000
0.000
DISTANCE
FROM START
LOADING
USERS TRUCK
FORWARD
PIVOT ON SECTION
MEMBER 1
USERS TRUCK
-0.8585348
-0.8585348
FORWARD
PIVOT ON SECTION
MEMBER 3
55.64647
55.64647
-1.064582
-1.064582
1029
-265.6179
-265.6179
1009
-11.04779
-53.63107
------------------/
Z BENDING
59.30810
24.96671
------------------/
Z BENDING
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------MEMBER 4
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
{
{
{
{
{
{
Chapter 3
Loads
Code
Reference
LOADING
FR
1.000
0.000
FR
DISTANCE
FROM START
1.000
0.000
DISTANCE
FROM START
LOADING
USERS TRUCK
FORWARD
PIVOT ON SECTION
MEMBER 1
USERS TRUCK
-0.1425789
-0.1425789
FORWARD
PIVOT ON SECTION
MEMBER 1
-86.08118
-86.08118
-0.2046868
-0.2046868
2539
-347.5455
-347.5455
2026
-27.00405
-35.19152
------------------/
Z BENDING
34.05972
28.35657
------------------/
Z BENDING
Loads
Chapter 3
Code
Reference
Page 3.1-B1-29
Chapter 3
Page 3.1-B1-30
Loads