Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
EDWARD BROVARSKI
92
ZS 140 (2013)
14
H. Goed ic k e, Knigliche Dokumente aus dem
Alten Reich, (A 14; Wiesbaden, 1967), 37 40, fig. 3;
T. G. H. J ames, Hieroglyphic Texts from Egyptian
Stelae etc., Part 1, 2nd edition (London, 1961), pl. 31
(hereafter HTES I2); see also, N. C. Str u d wick , Texts
from the Pyramid Age, (Writings from the Ancient
World 16; Atlanta, 2005), 102 103.
15
Kanaw ati , Governmental Reforms, 25. It may
be noted that NY in the late Sixth Dynasty is Yh\
wA u{Ans oA~hn; Et. Dr ioton and J. Ph. Lau e r , Un
groupe des tombes Saqqarah: IcheY, Nefer-khououptah, Sebek-em-khent et nkhi, ASAE 55 (1958), 226,
pl. 19. On the date of the tomb, see E. Br ov arsk i ,
False Doors & history: the Sixth Dynasty, in M.
Brta (ed.), The Old Kingdom Art and Archaeology,
Proceedings of the Conference, Prague, May 31June 4,
2004 (Prague, 2006), 110111. Even earlier, in the
Fourth Dynasty, the treasury official N[Y was
unn h u{Ans oAhn; see note 8.
ZS 140 (2013)
16
Ibid., 52 53.
Ibid., 89.
18
Baer, Rank and Title, 84, 291 [212]; Y. Har p ur ,
Decoration in Egyptian Tombs of the Old Kingdom
(London and New York, 1987), 280; N. Kan aw ati,
Chronology of the Old Kingdom Nobles of El-Qusiya
Revisited, in Z. A. H a wa s s , P. Der Ma nuel i a n ,
and R. B. Hus sei n (eds.), Perspectives on Ancient
Egypt: Studies in Honor of Edward Brovarski (CASAE
40; Cairo, 2010), 217.
19
H. G. Fischer, Dendera in the Third Millenium
B.C. (Locust Valley, New York, 1968), 94, with the
exception of w}|\ (18).
17
93
20
20
wwY is dated by both St r ud wi ck (Administration, 99 [67]) and Har p ur (Decoration, 274) from
Merenre to early Pepy II. The fact that his false door
panel shows the figure of the deceased unaccompanied
by service furniture or cult vessels argues for a date in
the second half of the reign of Pepy II (Br ov ar s k i, in
Old Kingdom Art and Archaeology, 114 ff., pace ibid.,
102.
21
H. Kees, Beitrge zur Geschichte des Vezirats
im Alten Reiche, Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der
Wissenschaften zu Gttingen. Phil.-Hist. Klasse, N. F.
IV, No. 2 (1940), 39 54; W. He lck, Untersuchungen
zu den Beamtentiteln des gyptischen Alten Reiches
(F 18; Glckstadt, 1954), 141; Baer, Rank and Title,
61 [73A].
22
G. J quier, Le monument funraire de Pepi II,
vol. 2, (Cairo, 1938), pl. 48.
23
Strud wick , Administration, 63 65.
24
H. G. Fischer, A Provincial Statue of the
Egyptian Sixth Dynasty, AJA 66 (1962), 67, points out
that the name NY with the ear determinative means
one who is hard of hearing.
94
25
Administration, 318.
Ibid., Table 29.
27
Nh{\ was evidently a son of the overseer of all
works of the king Nekhebu known from his lengthy
autobiography found at Giza; see E. Brov ars k i , The
Senedjemib Complex, Part 1 (Giza Mastabas 7; Boston,
2001), 33 34.
28
For the date of the various phases of Pepy IIs
mortuary temple, see Strud wick , Administration, 64
65.
29
Ibid., 64, n. 3
26
ZS 140 (2013)
30
ZS 140 (2013)
Ibid., pls. 6, 9.
Rank and Title, pp. 63, 288 [83].
39
Decoration, p. 281.
40
See E. Brov ars k i , The late Old Kingdom at
South Saqqara, in L. Pan tala cc i and C. Ber ger- el Nagg ar (eds.), Des Nferkar aux Montouhotep,
(TMO 40; Lyon, 2005), 42.
41
For the difference between the older and newer
types of provincial titles, see e.g., B aer , Rank and Title,
275; Fischer , Dendera, 9 10; Kan a wati , Governmental Reforms, 51, 72, and passim.
42
Baer, Rank and Title, 81, 290 [182]; Har pur ,
Decoration, 280.
38
95
96
49
nomes 1015 belonged to this region . Presumably, the corresponding southern area therefore would have consisted of U. E. nomes 19
and his northern area of U. E. nomes 1622. By
contrast, Goedicke located the southern of his
three sections between U. E. nomes 17, the
middle of his sections between U. E. nomes
815, and the northern one between U. E.
50
nomes 1622 .
Baer too found evidence for a triple division
of Upper Egypt into three areas based on the
evolution of the titles of provincial governors; a
southernmost one; a central district; and a
northern one. His border lines were in each case
51
one nome further south than Goedickes. He
thus concluded that the southern region comprised U. E. nomes 16, the middle one U. E.
nomes 714, and the northern one of U. E.
52
nomes 1522 .
Fischer concurred with Kees reasoning
about the extent of the middle nomes, but
supposed that the Ninth Nome was also in53
cluded . He also makes reference to the title of a
Sixth Dynasty nomarch of Zawiyet el-Meitin,
\|}{\, Yh\wA n{s h u{Ans , overseer of
54
commissions in 9 nomes . To Fischer, this
group of nomes apparently represents the portion of Upper Egypt north of the middle
nomes, thus U. E. nomes 1622. He excludes
U. E. 15 from the nine nomes under \|}
{\s jurisdiction, since it had its own governors
from Dynasty V onwards, but he counts the
Fayum and the Goat District to its south to
reach the total of nine nomes. He is uncertain
whether the area south of the middle nomes
included the Thinite nome (U. E. nome 8),
which was associated with the central administration to an exceptional degree and which
49
47
ZS 140 (2013)
ZS 140 (2013)
97
Reign of Pepy II
Before proceeding to a discussion of the
overseers of Upper Egypt in the First Intermediate Period mention should be made of one
such individual who possibly still belongs to the
reign of Pepy II. While two features of his false
62
door point to that conclusion , it is not clear to
which period of Pepys long reign that he belongs. This is C[\ (35), the proprietor of a small
mud brick mastaba northwest of King Tetis
pyramid at Saqqara.
Another individual who may have served
Pepy II is the As\|, Yh\wA h|n 'Yhnus
(29). 'Yhnuss false door possesses a supplementary frame consisting of a lintel and two
jambs outside the cavetto cornice and the false
63
door proper . The earliest datable false door
with the supplementary frame belongs to w\w|
YAh, who apparently worked for Pepy II as vizier
at the end of the first half of his reign. Other
examples of the supplementary frame belong to
the end of Pepys reign or immediately follow64
ing . Another feature of import for dating is the
table scene which is confined to the seated figure of 'Yhnus at table of bread and a single ewer and basin. This disposition of the table
scene begins seemingly in the early part of the
reign of Pepy II. The datable examples of the
scheme all appear to belong to the long reign of
65
Pepy II .
61
See Appendix.
See Brov ars k i , in Old Kingdom Art and Archaeology, 104.
63
I would like to express my thanks to Drs. Vincent
Razanajao, Francisco Bosch-Puche, and Elizabeth
Fleming of the Topographical Bibliography for information about the false door as well as a schematic drawing of its layout by Dr. Bosch-Puche.
64
Brovars k i , in Old Kingdom Art and Archaeology, 109 111.
65
Ibid., 89 94.
62
98
ZS 140 (2013)
Status of Abydos
Abydos was clearly the vantage point from
which }Y the Elder (8) oversaw the affairs of
the 22 nomes of Upper Egypt. Several monuments of other Sixth Dynasty overseers of Upper Egypt were found at Abydos. These include
a stele from the Middle Necropolis belonging to
{\u} (17), who may have served Pepy I or a
later sovereign of Dyn. VI, another stele of an
NY (4), who served in that capacity probably in
the early reign of Pepy II, an inscribed block
from the northern enclosure of the Kom esSultan commemorating AY (11), who may
belong to the first half of the reign of Pepy II,
and the false door and a side piece from a nichechapel of {\}s (15, 16), who held office at the
end of the reign of Pepy II or later. None of
these constitute absolute evidence that Abydos
was the seat of the principle overseer of Upper
Egypt, for it is possible that the fame of
Khentyamentiu led officials to erect cenotaphs
at Abydos as they later did at the terrace of
73
Osiriss temple .
We do know that an overseer of Upper Egypt
was resident at Abydos in the later Ninth
Dynasty, for Ankhtify of Moalla caused the
council of the overseer of Upper Egypt who is
in the Thinite nome, to visit Moalla in order to
71
N. de G. Davies , The Rock Tombs of Deir elGebrwi, Part 2 (ASE 12; London, 1902), pl. 9.
72
Fischer, Dendera, 95; cf. E. Mart in-Pa r d ey,
Untersuchungen zur gyptischen Provinzialverwaltung
bis zum Ende des Alten Reiches (HB 1; Hildesheim,
1976), 154 159.
73
W. K. Simp son, The Terrace of the Great God
at Abydos (PPYE 5; New Haven and Philadelphia,
1974).
ZS 140 (2013)
99
79
H. G. Fischer, review of Three Old-Kingdom
Tombs at Thebes, by M. S aleh, in BiOr 36, no. 1/2,
January-March 1979, 30 31.
80
M. Saleh, Three Old-Kingdom Tombs at Thebes
(AV 14; Mainz am Rhein, 1977), pl. 8; see Har p ur ,
Decoration, 219; E. Brov ars k i , A Second Style in
Egyptian Relief of the Old Kingdom, in S. E.
Thompson and P. Der Manuelian (eds.), in Egypt
and Beyond: Essays Presented to Leonard H. Lesko
upon His Retirement from the Wilbour Chair of Egyptology at Brown University, June 2005 (Providence, RI,
2008), 76.
81
See E. Brov ars k i , An Unpublished Stele of the
First Intermediate Period in the Oriental Institute Museum, JNES 32 (1973), 459 and n. 22. On ibid., 461,
the provenance of Louvre C. 198 was inadvertently
given as Naga ed-Deir, when Abydos was actually intended.
82
Fischer, Dendera, 76, 117.
100
ZS 140 (2013)
90
the offering table of the deceased . An epigraphic feature of importance is the suppression
of the falcon-sign in the writing of Khentyamentiu. At Abydos this suppression occurs in two
false doors that belong to the end of the reign of
Pepy II or a little later and a stele which can
hardly be any earlier than the last years of the
Sixth Dynasty, and may very well belong to the
91
Eighth . Henry Fischer has in fact suggested
that Louvre C 28 probably derives from Aby92
dos .
Erected within the enclosure wall of the
mastaba of the vizier wwnYjA'Y, the small
tomb of the overseer of Upper Egypt A}}':
=}n (72) consists of a false door, two sidepieces, and a lintel. Firth believed =}n was a son
of wwnYjA'Y who inserted his figure in the
well-known scene of wwnYjA'Y painting the
93
seasons . Baer rejected the identification and
instead thought =}n belonged to the late Old
94
Kingdom . Perhaps this was on account of the
title string ]w\s{ }uns Yh\wA h|n, which also
occurs with the overseer of Upper Egypt }Yu
95
|} (56) . Like }Yu|}, too, =}n is Yh\wA
}ns\. =}ns false door is fragmentary and the
diagnostic table scene missing, but the presence
of four jambs (rather than six jambs) may indicate a date in the second half of the reign of
96
Pepy II or later .
Coptos decree I, addressed by an unknown
king of Dynasty VIII to the Yh\wA }Yns, sA\s\ [A
As\, Yh\wA h|n, Yh\wA hn}sw, uhA }n hAY
83
90
Ibid., 89 93.
H. G. Fischer, The Cult and Nome of the
Goddess Bat, JARCE 1 (1962), 10.
92
H. G. Fischer, A Parental Link between two
Thinite Stelae of the Heracleopolitan Period, BES 9
(1987/1988), 15.
93
C. M. Firth and B. Gun n, Teti Pyramid Cemeteries, 2 vols. (Cairo, 1926), 27, 38, pl. 17 D.
94
Rank and Title, 145, 294 [533].
95
Sale h, Three Old-Kingdom Tombs, figs. 3 4. It
should be noted that the same pair of titles are attested
for the much earlier overseer of Upper Egypt ss{
~: Y (19), who probably belonged to the reign of
Unis; see R. F. E. Paget and A. A. Pirie with comments by F. Ll. Gr iffith, The Tomb of Ptah-hetep
(London, 1989), pl. 35 and, for the date, Bae r , Rank
and Title, 75, 290 [161]; Har pur , Decoration, 274.
96
Brovars k i , in Old Kingdom Art and Archaeology, 99 100.
91
ZS 140 (2013)
101
102
face . In Text B from the tomb, hAY is addressed as Yw\{|s, As\|, uhw n|s\, ]w\s, Yh\
wA hn}w, uhA }n, but not vizier or overseer
of Upper Egypt (70). On one of the steles, however, he is Yw\{|s, As\|, Yh\wA h|n, Yh\wA hn
}w. Exept for the last title, this is the same dignity that hAY is known by on a basalt statue base
in the Brooklyn Museum (69). It seems likely
that the hA;Y mentioned in the Elephantine
archive (68) represents the vizier hAY at an ear103
lier stage of his career , when he still was As\|,
Yh\wA h|n and before he was promoted to Yw\
{|s, As\|, Yh\wA h|n and ultimately to vizier.
Coptos M and O constitute decrees of King
Neferkauhor naming NY (53) overseer of Upper
Egypt in U. E. nomes 17 subordinate to his
father, the Vizier and Overseer of Upper Egypt
hAY, who has overall authority over all the
nomes of the South, as we have already seen. In
the two decrees, NY is addressed as As\|, shs\
Ys\, Yh\wA h|n. NY was elevated to the vizierate as Ys }w, hw\ }w, Yw\{As, us\ }un, Yh\wA }Yns,
sA\s\ [A As\, uhA }n presumably at the death of
his father by Neferkauhors successor, King
104
Neferirkare II .
It seems likely that hAY and NY were the
principal representatives of the central administration in southern Upper Egypt. Yet Text B at
Kom el-Kuffar, dedicated by NY after his fathers death, suggests that the influence hAY
exerted over the affairs of the kingdom in the
105
Southland did not go unresented . At the very
least it is clear from the inscription that hAYs
tomb and statues (and those of his ancestors as
well) were damaged and were restored after his
death by his son NY, who also took vengeance
on the perpetrators. It is probably against this
102
G. P. Gil be r t, Three recently excavated funerary Stelae from the Eighth Dynasty Tomb of Shemai
at Kom el-Momamien, Qift, JEA 90 (2004), 73 79,
figs. 2 7.
103
As suggested by H. Goed ick e, Zur Chronologie der sogenannten Ersten Zwischenzeit, ZDMG
112 (1963), 248, n. 41.
104
Haye s, JEA 32 (1946), 21; see G oed ic ke,
Knigliche Dokumente, fig. 28 (Coptos R); Mostaf a ,
in Studies in Honor of Ali Radwan 2, 171 172.
105
Mostafa, ASAE 70 (1984 1985), 419 429,
pls. 1 2.
102
ZS 140 (2013)
ZS 140 (2013)
117
103
120
See recently Br ov arsk i , Naga-ed-Deir in the
First Intermediate Period, Chapter 2 (forthcoming).
121
Ibid.
122
H. G. Fischer, Inscriptions from the Coptite
Nome (AnOr 40; Rome, 1964), 42 43.
123
Brovarski, Naga-ed-Deir in the First Intermediate Period, Chapter 2 (forthcoming).
104
ZS 140 (2013)
130
ZS 140 (2013)
134
Fischer, Dendera, 202 and n. 802. Fischers references are to CG 1609 and the Devonshire stele of
s\ (H. W. Mll e r , Die Totendenksteine des Mittleren Reiches, ihre Genesis, ihre Darstellungen und
ihre Komposition, MDAIK 4 (1933), 187, fig. 11;
G. B. Deak i n, Two Egyptian Stelae in the Devonshire Collection, Transactions of the Hunter Archaeological Society 10 (1971), 63 65, 67; M. Lich thei m ,
Ancient Egyptian Autobiographies Chiefly of the Middle Kingdom (OBO 84; Freiburg and Gttingen, 1988),
no. 26). No examples earlier than the one under discussion are given. One of Ankhtifys daughters was named
c
|Yn (J. Van d ier , Mo alla (Bd 18 Cairo, 1950), 259),
but she could have been named after the triple
nomarch.
135
Fischer, Dendera, pp. 86, 196.
136
Ibid., 85 91, 196 214, for the |Yn Group, see
ibid., p. 185, n. 88.
137
Fischer, Dendera, 85 91.
138
CG 1442: Fischer, Coptite Nome, no. 13.
139
Fischer, Dendera, 199 201.
140
Ibid., 129 and n. 571; 203.
105
141
Ibid., 202.
Brovarski, Naga-ed-Deir in the First Intermediate Period, Chapter 10 (forthcoming).
143
Vandier, Mocalla, II, d, 1.
144
Ibid., II, b, 3-II, g, 1.
145
Ibid., IV, 15.
142
106
ZS 140 (2013)
Middle Kingdom
In one of four inscriptions he left in the Wadi
Hammamat (no. 113) commemorating a number of wonders that took place in year 2 of King
sAn\| Mentuhotep IV, the vizier Nh}hAs
(84) has the title Yh\wA h|n hYy', overseer
of Upper Egypt in its entirety as well. It is
commonplace idea today that Nh}hAs, who
appears as a powerful and authoritative figure,
indeed overseer of everything in this entire
land, according to inscription No. 110, a few
151
See E. Br o v ar ski, Ahanakht of Bersheh and
the Hare Nome in the First Intermediate Period, in
W. K. Simps on and W. M. Da v i s, Studies in Ancient
Egypt, the Aegean, and the Sudan: Essays in honor of
Dows Dunham on the occasion of his 90th birthday,
June 1, 1980 (Boston, 1981), 27, n. 120.
152
Brovars k i , in Egyptian Culture and Society 1,
31 85; idem, in From Illahun to Djeme, 2530.
153
R. Anthes, Die Felseninschriften von Hatnub
(UGA 9; Leipzig, 1928), Gr. 24.
ZS 140 (2013)
107
On his stele in Leiden 6 (V.5) the Chief Steward ={wjA| (87) bears the title overseer of
Upper Egypt. On CG 20531, he is Yh\wA jAs }s
}s }uns and Yh\wA |]}ns\. The stele, which was
found at Abydos, bears the cartouches of Amenemhat II. By the time the Leiden stele was
carved ={wjA| was promoted to Yh\wA {wnw
h sA ww', w\s{ |A } sA ww', Yh\wA h|n, Yh\wA
oAhn. It is unclear how much time intervened
between the cutting of the first stele and the
second. It is conceivable that ={wjA| went on
to serve Senusert II as great steward.
There is little doubt that the owners of
160
the two steles are identical . The mother of
={wjA| on the Cairo stele is called N}Yh\s
and, while the owner of the Leiden stele is born
of N}Y, the mother is elsewhere on the same
stele called h\s. The father of ={wjA| on
CG 20531 is An, and he is certainly identical
with the father of ={wjA| on the Leiden stele
though this latter An has the epithet the
161
Younger .
The next Yh\wA h|n may have been ns\
s{ (90), nomarch of the Hare nome and high
priest of Thoth, lord of Hermopolis, whose
famous rock-cut tomb at Bersheh forms such an
attraction today. An inscription on the righthand jamb of the portico of his tomb asserts
that he was a uhw n|s\ under Senusert III. Perhaps, he served in office through much of the
latter sovereigns reign.
The presence of three overseers of Upper
Egypt in the reigns of Senusert I, Amenemhat II, and Senusert III suggests that there was
indeed a continuation of that office from the
First Intermediate Period and the Eleventh Dynasty to the beginning of the Twelfth Dynasty.
154
108
162
H. Willems, Chests of Life, (MVEOL 25; Leiden, 1988), 161 164 (Type VI). The coffins of s|}
and his brother ?}h}s (infra) differ from these coffins
only in doubling the number of text columns.
163
G. Lapp, Typologie der Srge und Sargkammern
von der 6. bis 13. Dynastie, Studien zur Archlogie und
Geschichte Altgyptens, vol. 7 (Heidelberg, 1993), 292
(Rif1).
164
W. M. F. Petrie, Gizeh and Rifeh (BSAE/ERA
13; London, 1907), pl. X.E. Cf. e.g., Brussels E. 5687:
R. Engelbach and B. Gunn, Harageh (BSAE/ERA
20; London, 1923), pls. 1, 18; J. Van d ier , Manuel
darchologie gyptienne, Vol. 3 (Paris, 1958), 255, 267
[late Dyn. XII]; E. Delan ge, Catalogue des statues
gyptiennes du Moyen Empire 2060 1560 avant J.-C.
(Paris, 1987), 69 71 (Amenemhat III).
165
Simpson, Terrace of the Great God, pl. 60
(ANOC 41).
166
Gr ajetz k i , Hchste Beamte, 51.
ZS 140 (2013)
167
167
Ibid., 50 51.
W. K. Sim pson, Lepsius Pyramid LV at
Dahshur: the Mastaba of Si-ese, Vizier of Amenemhat
II, in J. Ba ines , T. G. H. J a mes, A. Le ahy, and
A. F. S hor e, (eds.), Pyramid Studies and Other Essays
presented to I. E. S. Edwards (London, 1988), 57 60.
169
Ibid., 59.
170
Franke, Personendaten, 311 (Doss. 511).
171
Ahmad el-Sawi, Die Stele des njAnw|u},
genannt Nnu}, und der }w}'u, GM 92 (1986),
87 89.
172
Cf. C. J. C. Benn ett, Growth of the CoN
Formula in the Middle Kingdom, JEA 27 (1941),
78 (pp. 77 82), and see especially E. A. W. Bud ge ,
Hieroglyphic Texts from Egyptian Stelae, &c., in the
British Museum, part 2 (London, 1912), pls. 3, 19, 30.
168
ZS 140 (2013)
109
173
185
185
110
193
ZS 140 (2013)
200
200
Ibid., 281.
See K. Ba er , Egyptian Chronology (Chicago,
1976), 1 2; Brov ars k i , Naga-ed-Dr Inscriptions,
43 54; Baud , in Ancient Egyptian Chronology, 156
158, assigns Dyn. VIII one generation but omits Dyn.
VII entirely.
202
Twenty to twenty-five years is below the average
of twenty-six years established by M. B. R owt on, The
Date of Hammurabi, JNES 17 (1958), 100 101, for
the throne tenure of seven generations of ancient oriental rulers. On the question of generation averages, see
more recently M. Bi erbr ier , The Late New Kingdom
in Egypt (Warminster: Arus & Phillips, 1975), xiii xvi,
and D. Heni ge, Generation-counting and late New
Kingdom chronology, JEA 67 (1981), 182 184.
Henige takes Bierbrier to task for arguing that any figure above twenty-five years is empirically unlikely.
203
Since no sepulcher is known for him, it is not absolutely certain that A'Y{/sYs son ?}Y|}n succeeded his father; see Kan aw ati , Akhmim, 128.
204
See Brov ars k i , in Mlanges Mokhtar 1, 135.
205
Kanaw ati , El-Hawawish 2, pls. 4, 23.
201
ZS 140 (2013)
111
206
Fischer, Coptite Nome, 40 and n. 20. See now
Brov ars k i , in Archaism and Innovation, 372, 393,
405. (pp. 359 423).
207
Brovarski, Naga-ed-Dr Inscriptions, 123
125, Chart 1.
208
Ibid., 266 287, 305 310, 381 386, Chart 1.
209
See Fischer , Dendera, 187.
210
N. Kan a wati , The Rock Tombs of ElHawawish, vol. 1 (Sydney, 1980), figs. 7, 9, 16, etc.
211
Ibid., 75, n. 313.
Summary
Some 85 overseers of Upper Egypt are known in
the period extending from the Old Kingdom
through the Middle Kingdom. The present article
provides an inventory of the holders of the title,
discusses the dating of the individuals concerned,
and the significance of the titles in these different
eras.
Keywords
First Intermediate Period Middle Kingdom nome
administration Old Kingdom overseer of Upper
Egypt
212
512.
TAFEL XV
False door of Overseer of Upper Egypt cbk-Htp, Louvre C 28/N 182. Courtesy of the Muse du Louvre,
Departement des Antiquits gyptiennes (zu Brovarski, Overseers of Upper Egypt, Part 1).
TAFEL XVI
Dagger blade inscribed for the Overseer of Upper Egypt d, MMA 29.2.8. Courtesy of the
Metropolitan Museum of Art, Department of Egyptian Art (zu Brovarski, Overseers of Upper Egypt, Part 1).