Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Preprint 05-67
Abstract
The Fort Knox Mine is located in Alaskas interior
where the average ambient air temperatures range from
-24 oC in January to 16 oC in July. The mill processes a
free milling gold ore utilizing both a gravity recovery
circuit and conventional cyanide leach/carbon-in-pulp
circuits. Plant slurry temperature cycles seasonally and
allows for a unique opportunity to measure the impact
temperature has on gold leach kinetics, carbon adsorption
efficiency
and
cyanide
destruction
reactions.
Mathematical models have been developed to accurately
predict actual mill performance. This paper describes the
development of the models and presents data that allow
for a better understanding of the impact of circuit
operating temperature on process efficiencies.
Introduction
The Fort Knox Mine, located in the Fairbanks Mining
District, 40-road km (25 miles) northeast of Fairbanks,
Alaska, began commercial gold production in the first
quarter of 1997. The average annual temperature at the
site is -3.6 oC (26 oF) with daily temperatures averaging
-23.8 oC (10.9 oF) in January and 15.8 oC (60.4 oF) in
July. The mine receives an average of 0.43 m (17 in.) of
annual precipitation with most of the precipitation falling
in the summertime and early fall. The average snow pack
is 1.65 m (65 in.) and snow remains on the ground from
early October until early April. The mine is accessible
year round from Fairbanks via the Steese Highway and
9.7 km (6 miles) of well-maintained gravel road.
The Fort Knox gold deposit is hosted within a multiphase granitic body with an elongated surface exposure.
Gold is contained in milky-white quartz stockwork veins
and veinlets, as well as along shears and fractures within
2 - 20 ft x30.5 ft
Ball Mills
7,000 Hp motor
10 - 26 in. hydorcyclones
10 - 26 in. hydorcyclones
Symons 7 ft
Short Head
Crusher
500 Hp motor
34 ft x 15.25 ft
SAG Mill
2 - 7,000 Hp motors
gravity tails
GRAVITY CIRCUIT
A u C o n c e n tr a te
Grind
Thickener
grinding
makeup
solution
Carbon-In-Pulp
6 - 52 ft. diam. X 46 ft.
Tailing
Thickener
Tailings Disposal
Facility
Detox Circuit
2 - 41 ft. daim. X 36 ft.
40
30
35
20
30
10
25
20
-10
15
-20
10
-30
leach circuit
-40
ambient air
Air Temperature, o C
-50
Oct-01
Aug-01
May-01
Feb-01
Nov-00
Sep-00
Jun-00
Mar-00
Dec-99
Sep-99
Jul-99
Jan-99
Apr-99
3.0%
Solution Gold Loss, %
2.5%
y = -0.0005x + 0.024
R2 = 0.3601
2.0%
1.5%
1.0%
0.5%
0.0%
8
10
93%
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
92%
91%
90%
89%
88%
y = 0.0021x + 0.861
R2 = 0.6571
87%
86%
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
700
650
y = 9.7722x + 294.13
R2 = 0.4126
600
550
500
450
400
350
300
250
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
3.0
y = -0.0565x + 2.4802
R2 = 0.473
SO2:NaCN
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
Model Development
Gold Dissolution in Cyanide Solution
The mechanism for gold dissolution using cyanide as
the complexing agent has been studied extensively with
general consensus that the reaction is electrochemical in
nature (Christy, 1896; Boonstra, 1943; Thompson, 1947;
Kirk et al., 1978; Lin and Chen, 2001). Additional gold
cyanidation evaluations have also been conducted
(Kudryk and Kellogg, 1954; Habashi, 1967; Wadsworth,
1991) with emphasis placed on reaction kinetics. The role
of the primary reactants (O2 and CN-) can be described by
evaluating the individual anodic and cathodic half
reaction equations. Equation (1) represents the overall
reaction (Elsners equation), while equations (2) and (3)
express the anodic reaction and complexing reaction,
respectively. Equations (4) and (5) represent the cathodic
reactions.
2Au+4CN-+O2+2H2O=2Au(CN)2-+H2O2+2OH-
(1)
Anodic (Oxidizing):
Complexing:
Au = Au+ + e
Au+ + 2CN- = Au(CN)2-
(2)
(3)
Cathodic (Reducing):
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
Dynamic Viscosity,
centipoise
40
35
30
25
20
5 deg C
15 deg C
25 deg C
35 deg C
15
10
5
0
35%
40%
45%
50% 55%
60%
Slurry Density, % solids (w/w)
65%
y = -0.2276x + 17.786
R2 = 0.6991
1996-1999
2004
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Leach Circuit Temperature, o C
40
140
120
200
175
2000
150
2001
125
2002
100
2003
75
2004
100
[NaCN], ppm
225
0
Jul-04
Jan-04
Jul-03
Jan-03
40
Jul-02
35
o
Jan-02
30
Jul-01
25
Jan-01
20
Jul-00
15
Jan-00
10
Jul-99
Jan-99
0
5
leach 1
leach 7
CIP disch
20
60
40
50
25
80
18%
extraction
16%
X =
150
0%
leach (
Au
- Au
)n
([Au]o-[Au]t )
(12)
Au
(13)
(9)
+ [Au] (11)
-1/(n -1)
Jan-01
300
2%
Oct-00
450
4%
Jan-00
Apr-00
Jul-00
600
6%
Oct-99
750
8%
Jan-99
Apr-99
Jul-99
900
10%
Oct-98
12%
d[Au]
dt
1
(n-1)
([Au]o-[Au])
1200
1050
Jan-98
Apr-98
Jul-98
1350
ounces
14%
Oct-97
1
(1-n )
(1-n )
{([Au]t -[Au])
- ([Au]o - [Au])
} (10)
(n -1) t
100%
90%
Gold Extraction, %
80%
100%
Gold Extraction, %
90%
70%
60%
50%
actual
n=1.5
n=2
n=3
40%
30%
80%
20%
70%
10%
60%
0%
0
50%
actual
n = 1.5
n = 2.0
n = 3.0
40%
30%
20%
8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
0%
2
10%
0
8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Leach Time, hrs
100%
90%
Gold Extraction, %
80%
70%
60%
50%
actual
n = 1.5
n = 2.0
n = 3.0
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0
8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Leach Time, hrs
leach (
Au - Au )3.0
(14)
0.5
-2.0
{( Au
- Au )
- ([Au]o-[Au])
-2.0
(15)
leach
t+
-0.50
( Au - Au )2.0
+ [Au] (16)
d[Au]
= - k CIP [Au]t
dt
[Au]t
= - k CIP t
[Au]L7
where:
12.0
10.0
ln kleach
6.0
4.0
[Au]t
y = -20870.09x + 77.03
R2 = 0.71
0.0032
0.0033
0.0034
0.0035
[NaCN]actual
[NaCN]ave
33
2.84 x 10
-20,870(1/T)
= [Au]L7
- k CIP t
(20)
0.0036
1/T, o K
leach
(19)
8.0
2.0
(18)
(17)
10
-4.400
0.90
-4.500
0.80
0.70
-4.600
y = 0.81975e -0.00810x
R2 = 0.99421
0.60
ln k CIP
0.50
-4.700
-4.800
0.40
y = -917.93x - 1.53
R2 = 0.60
0.30
-4.900
0.20
-5.000
0.0032
0.10
0.0033
0.0034
0.0035
0.0036
0.00
1/T, K
100
200
300
400
CIP Retention Time, minutes
500
0.0004
R2 = 0.38
0.0003
0.0002
0.0001
0.0000
-0.0001
-0.0002
-0.0003
-0.0004
8
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
where:
11
ARactual
ARave
0.22
-918 (1/T)
(21)
0.025
0.020
0.015
0.010
0.005
Oct-04
Apr-04
Oct-03
Apr-03
Oct-02
Apr-02
Oct-01
Apr-01
0.000
0.2500
0.2000
0.1500
0.1000
Estimated
Actual
0.0500
0.030
Oct-99
Estimated
Actual
Oct-00
0.035
Apr-00
0.040
0.0000
Jul-04
Jan-04
Jul-03
Jan-03
Jul-02
Jan-02
Jul-01
Jan-01
Jul-00
Jan-00
Jul-99
Jan-99
Jul-98
Jan-98
12
[Au]t
- k CIP t
= [Au]L7
ARactual
ARave
0.22
-918 (1/T)
References
Conclusions
[Au]t =
1.
leach
t+
2.
3.
4.
5.
-0.50
( Au - Au )2.0
6.
+ [Au]
The model uses the leach particle size (P80) and mill
feed grade [Au]HG to determine the unleachable gold
content [Au]. The retention time (t) is a function of
mill throughput rates (tpd) and slurry density (%
solids w/w).
The leach rate constant (kleach) was found to be a
function of leach circuit operating temperature and
leach cyanide concentration [NaCN].
leach
[NaCN]actual
[NaCN]ave
33
2.84 x 10
7.
8.
-20,870(1/T)
13
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
14