Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
by
J. O. Parra and C. L. Hackert
Southwest Research Institute
San Antonio, Texas
H.A. Collier
Collier Consulting
M. Bennet
South Florida Water Management District
SUMMARY
Digital processing of optical macroscopic (OM), SEM
and X-ray computed tomography (CT) images, and
petrography characterize the pore space of the pore
system of vuggy carbonates in South Florida. The
results of this analysis provided supportive information
to evaluate NMR well log signatures for NMR well log
calibration. Saturated and desaturated NMR core
measurements estimated the irreducible water in the
rock (associated with the matrix porosity) and estimate
the variable T2 cut offs for the NMR well log
calibration. The measurements established empirical
equations to extract permeability from NMR well logs
in South Florida. Analysis of synthetic and observed
NMR signatures demonstrated that NMR well logs
capture only the micro and macro porosities of the
carbonate rock. The CT image processing and the
ultrasonic analysis provided information to
characterize the acoustic signatures caused by
interconnected and connected vugs in core samples.
The ultrasonic core and geotechnical data provided
velocity versus porosity relationships based on flow
zone indicators. This relationships are input in a
poroelastic modeling program to determine the squirt
flow lengths associated with the fluid flow between the
matrix and the vugs and between the vugs. Based on
this information attenuation and dispersion curves of
the vuggy carbonate rock are simulated in the
frequency range of sonic logs. This suggests that full
waveform sonic can image the vuggy carbonate rock.
INTRODUCTION
area
rpore = 2
perimeter
(1)
2
1
1
=
+
T2 rpore T2b
(2)
BVI
b 1
FZI =
BVI
1
1+ a
k = 1014 FZI
T2 cutoff
128 ms
85 ms
6.5
(4)
(1 )
(5)
(3)
ACOUSTIC SIGNATURES
P-wave velocity versus permeability. One of our goals
was to establish velocity-permeability relations
grouped on the basis of flow zone indicators (FZI) on
a set of 24 core samples. We applied the FZI concept
given by Amaefule et al. (1993) to separate the P-wave
velocity in flow units as a function of permeability.
The second objective was to model the observed
velocity core data using poroelasticity to determine
squirt-flow lengths. The best fit between observed and
calculated velocity provides the squirt-flow parameters
and a better bulk modulus for each sample. To
determine the squirt-flow lengths for each sample
T2i/Nz
> 0.3728 s
0.0729 - 0.3728 s
< 0.0729 s
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Support for this work was provided by the U.S.
Department of Energy, Contract No. DE-AC2699BC15203. The assistance of Mr. Purna Halder is
gratefully acknowledged. We also thank the South
Florida Water Management District for allowing us to
access cores and data for this project.
REFERENCES
Amaefule, J.O., Attunbay, M.., Tia B.D., Kersey,
D.G., Keelan, D.K., 1993, Enhanced reservoir
description: using core and log data to identify
hydraulic (flow) units and predict permeability in
cored intervals/wells: SPE 26436, 1-16.
Anselmetti, F.S., Luthi, S.,and Eberli, G.P., 1998,
Quantitative characterization of carbonate pore
systems by digital image analysis, AAPG Bulletin
82, 1815-1836.
Chang, D., Vinegar, H., Moriss, C., and Straley, C.
1997, Effective porosity, producible fluid, and
permeability in carbonates from NMR logging,
Log Analyst 38, 60-72.
Choquette, P.W., and Pray, L.C., 1970, Geological
nomenclature and classification of porosity in
sedimentary carbonates: AAPG Bulletin, 54, 207250.
Lucia, F.J., 1983, Petrophysical parameters estimated
from visual description of carbonate rocks: a field
classification of carbonate pore space: Journal of
Petroleum Technology, 35, 626-637.
Ohen, H.A., Enwere, P.M., Kier, J., 1999, NMR
relaxivity grouping or NMR facies identification
is key to effective integration of core NMR data
with wireline log: SCA-9942.
Parra, J.O., 2000, Poroelastic model to relate seismic
wave attenuation and dispersion to anisotropy:
Geophysics, 65, 202-210.
Ramakrishnan, T.S., Schwartz, L.M., Fordham, E.J.,
Kenyon, W.E., and Wilkinson, D.J., 1999,
Forward models for nuclear magnetic resonance
in carbonate rocks, Log Analyst 40, 260-270.
0.06
CT
OM
0.05
combined porosity
SEM 300x
SEM 3000x
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0
10-2
10-1
100
101
102
103
104
Figure 1: Pore size distribution for core #41 based on multiple imaging methods
0.07
0.07
Core #41 predicted
well log observed
0.06
0.05
partial porosity
partial porosity
0.06
0.04
0.03
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.01
0
0
10
10
10
10
T2 (ms)
10
10
10
0
0
10
10
10
T2 (ms)
10
10
Figure 2: Predicted T2 distribution based on pore size histogram, compared to T2 distribution from
well log. Only the porosity measured by the SEM imaging has a T2 decay time less than the bulk
0.04
OM
combined porosity
0.03
CT
SEM 300x
SEM 3000x
0.02
0.01
0 -2
10
10-1
100
101
102
103
104
Figure 3: Pore size distribution for core #7 based on multiple imaging methods
0.04
Core #7 predicted
well log observed
partial porosity
0.03
0.02
0.01
0
100
101
102
103
T2 (ms)
104
105
106
Figure 4: Predicted T2 distribution based on pore size histogram, compared to T2 distribution from
well log. Only the porosity measured by the SEM imaging has a T2 decay time less than the bulk rate.
10
total porosity
BVI - standard cutoff
BVI - variable cutoff
1000
T2 distrubution
with median and cutoffs
lithology units
1000
sand
sandy limestone
1025
1025
moldic limestone
1050
1050
sand
interparticle
porosity
limestone
1100
1100
1125
depth (ft)
1075
depth (ft)
1075
1125
1150
1150
chalky
moldic
limestone
1175
1200
0
25
1175
50
permeability (md)
log10 (t2)
1200
Figure 5: Interpretation of NMR logs using both a fixed (90 ms) T2 cutoff and a variable T2 cutoff
derived from core NMR measurements. The far right plot shows the T2 distribution in the color scale
and overlain red lines. The black curve is the median T2 value, used with the porosity to discriminate
among relaxivity units. The white line is the variable T2 cutoff.
Figure 6: Cross plots of 24 measured and calculated P-wave velocity samples versus permeability.
The curves represent six flow units. The numbers in the plot are squirt-flow lengths in millimeters
11
Figure 8: (a) Full waveform sonic microseismogram, and (b) its spectra from first receiver, showing
data only between 1000 -1050 ft.
12