Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
117
Environment & Recourses DTU, Building 115, 2800 Lyngby, Technical University of Denmark; 2 Wageningen
Agricultural University, Subdepartment of Environmental Technology, P.O. Box 8129, 6700 EV Wageningen
(*author for correspondence, phone: +45-45251429; fax: +45-45932850; e-mail: ria@er.dtu.dk)
1. Introduction
Anaerobic degradation or digestion can be
dened as a biological conversion process without
external electron acceptor such as oxygen as in
aerobic processes or nitrate/sulphate as in anoxic
processes. In the anaerobic process organic carbon
is converted by subsequent oxidations and reductions to its most oxidized state (CO2 ), and its most
reduced state (CH4 ). A wide range of microorganisms catalyze the process in the absence of
oxygen (McInerney et al. 1980). The main products of the process are carbon dioxide and methane, but minor quantities (usually less than 1% of
the total gas volume) of other products such as
nitrogen, nitrogen oxides, hydrogen, ammonia,
hydrogen sulphide and other volatile compounds
are also generated (McInerney et al. 1980). The
mixture of gaseous products is termed biogas and
the anaerobic degradation process is often also
termed the biogas process. As the result of the
removal of carbon, organic bound non-carbon
compounds are released to their soluble inorganic
form.
With the increasing application of the anaerobic digestion process there is an urgent need to
review methods for estimation of the biodegradability and methane potential of wastes used in for
anaerobic digestion.
118
2. Some general considerations concerning
/inuencing anaerobic biodegradation
There are several physical, chemical and physiological factors in the environment that aect biodegradation of organic compounds, such as
availability of the compounds, the availability of
electron donors and acceptors, oxygen concentration, temperature, pH, moisture, salinity, sorption
of chemicals to particulate material, concentration
of the chemicals. Dierent factors might have
dierent inuence according the specic characteristics of the compound.
2.1. Redox conditions
One of the major factors governing biodegradation is the nature and availability of electron acceptors. From a thermodynamic point of view,
oxygen is the most favourable electron acceptor.
Under anoxic conditions, the biodegradation will
often depend on the availability of electron acceptors, such as nitrate, iron, sulphate or carbon
dioxide. In truly anaerobic conditions there is absence of inorganic electron acceptors other than
CO2 , and small amount of energy is gained by
consecutive oxidations reductions of the organic
matter, or CO2 is used as electron acceptor. The
energy released in a redox process as a result of
electron transfer from one compound to another,
is used for the maintenance and growth of the
microbial population in the environment.
2.2. Temperature
Temperature aects survival and growth of
microorganisms and it also inuences their metabolic activities. In general, higher temperatures
that do not kill microorganisms result in higher
metabolic activities. Temperature is the most
important variable in controlling the rate of
microbial metabolism in anaerobic environments
(Westermann et al. 1989).
Anaerobic digestion is applied under three
dierent temperature ranges, i.e. the mesophilic
(2540 C), the thermophilic (4560 C) and the
psychrophilic (<20 C). In general, the overall
process rates double for every 1 C increase in
operating temperature up to an optimum temperature 60 C (Harmon et al. 1993). The optimum
temperature for growth usually is close to the
119
exist for the release of enzymes and the subsequent
hydrolysis of the complex substrate during anaerobic digestion (Batstone 2000).
1. The organism secretes enzymes to the bulk liquid, where they will either adsorb to a particle
or react with a soluble substrate (Jain et al.
1992).
2. The organism attaches to the particle, secretes
enzymes into the vicinity of the particle and next
the organism will benet from the released dissolved substrates (Vavilin et al. 1996).
3. The organism has an attached enzyme that may
also act as a transport receptor to the interior of
the cell. This method requires the organism to
absorb onto the surface of the particle.
Research on aerobic sludge has indicated that
most of the extracellular enzymes are associated to
the biomass (Morgenroth et al. 2002). Only a few
studies have been done on anaerobic sludge but
also in this case the enzymes seem to be cell
associated (Hobson 1987; Philip et al. 1993).
Mechanisms 2 and 3 seem therefore more likely
than mechanism 1. This indicates that good contact between biomass and substrate is a prerequisite to the hydrolysis.
2.3.2. Aspects related to the enzymatic
depolymeriation
Hydrolytic enzymes can be endo-enzymes, which
prefer to cut the bonds towards the middle of the
molecule, or exo-enzymes, which prefer to cut the
bonds near to the edges of the macromolecule. The
enzyme substrate specic activity is thought to
follow MichaelisMenten kinetics.
The overall eect of the digestion temperature
on the hydrolysis rate originates from the combined temperature eect on the enzyme kinetics,
bacterial growth and solubility of the substrate.
For instance, the GibbsHelmoltz equation
gives the relation between temperature and pKa of
the enzymes. The change in charge will have consequences for the structure of the enzyme resulting
in changes of catalytic eciency, amount of active
enzyme and binding of the substrate (Chaplin &
Bucke 1990). In general, the rates of reactions vary
with temperature in accordance with the Arrhenius
equation. Veeken and Hamelers (1999) digested
several biowaste components, such as orange
peels, bark, leaf and grass at 20, 30 and 40 C.
They found a good Arrhenius relation between the
120
Table 1. Surface related hydrolysis rate assessed for dierent substrates
Substrate
Hydrolysis rate
(mg COD/cm2/day)
Inoculum
Temperature (C)
Reactor
Reference
Starch
Rice
Hay
Cellulose
1.0
1.1
0.01
0.33
35
35
35
38
Batch
Batch
Batch
CSTR
121
122
2002a). The degree of primary biodegradation
must of course in this case be assessed via substrate
depletion instead of methane production, or as
sum of product formation (VFA and methane).
Acidogenic conditions can be prevented by
estimation of the maximum VFA production
during the assay, so that sucient inoculum can be
added to provide enough methanogenic activity
to remove the VFA at all times. As the hydrolysis
depends on the concentration of the substrate that
is to be hydrolyzed, the highest production of VFA
is to be expected in the rst day after incubation.
Based on this the minimal amount of inoculum
that has to be added can therefore be calculated as
follows:
Xss Vww kh Vinoculum VSSinoculum Ainoculum
Vreactor
Vreactor
Vinoculum
Xss Vww kh
VSSinoculum Ainoculum
1
2
As the hydrolysis constant is unknown applying Equations 1 and 2 requires an estimated value
for the hydrolysis constant. However, as the minimum amount of inoculum to be used in the
experiment is wanted, it is preferable to use an
overestimated value for the kh than an underestimated value.
3.4. Medium
An important factor associated with the inoculum
is the medium, which can be added to the inoculum
during degradation experiments. Medium consists
of several minerals and does not contain any signicant amount of organic carbon. Synthetic
medium can be added as a source of nutrients of
micronutrients, growth factors vitamins and trace
metals necessary for growth of the microorganisms.
Synthetic media are used in cases that lack of
important for growth components might be limiting microbial growth. Important components needed for growth, are shown in Table 2.
An example of a synthetic basic medium used
in anaerobic tests [modied from previously described basic medium (Angelidaki et al. 1990) is
shown in Table 3.
3.5. pH
pH plays a major part in anaerobic biodegradation. pH inuences the activity of the hydrolytic
enzymes and the microorganisms which are active
Nitrogen
123
within certain, usually narrow pH ranges. The
anaerobic digestion process occurs in the pH
interval of 6.08.3. Most methanogens have a pH
optimum between 7 and 8 while the acid forming
bacteria often have a lower optimum (Angelidaki
& Ahring 1994). If the pH of the waste to be tested
is outside the optimal range, and if enough buer
capacity is not present, the anaerobic process will
be inhibited. This will lead underestimation of the
methane potential.
tion vary signicantly among the published methods (Owen et al. 1978; Eleazer et al. 1997; Owens &
Chynoweth 1993; Adani et al. 2001; Harries et al.
2001; Heerenklage et al. 2002; Hansen et al. 2003).
Some of these dierences originate from the purpose of measuring the methane potential and from
the type of waste samples measured.
According to the DTU protocol for determination of the methane potential the sample is
inoculated with 6090% w/w (depending on the
organic load of the waste) digested manure from a
reactor operating at thermophilic temperature
(55 C) (Hansen et al. 2003). Large inoculation
volumes are ensuring high microbial activity, low
risk for overloading and low risk of inhibition.
Thermophilic temperature would ensure fast reaction rates. Furthermore, digested manure has been
shown to be superior to digested sludge as it is rich
to many nutrients, and has a high buer capacity
(Angelidaki & Ahring 1994). Inoculum is degassed
by incubation at 55 C before use for a few days to
ensure that methane production from inoculum is
as low as possible. The sample is diluted with water
at dierent dilutions (from undiluted waste to 90%
w/w dilution) to ensure that possible toxicity of the
sample is not overseen. The dilutions used are
depending on the type of waste and the expected
toxicity or overloading to the anaerobic process.
Serum vials are thoroughly gassed with N2 : CO2
(80 : 20) before addition of inoculum and waste,
sealed with butyl stoppers and closed with aluminium crimps. The vials are incubated at 55 C.
The test is run in triplicates. The accumulated
methane production in the headspace of the vials is
124
Figure 2. Experimental set-up for anaerobic biodegradation test used at Denmark Technical University (DTU) for standard biogas
potential tests.
125
a waste. COD is usually used for description of
wastewaters, while VS is used for slurries and solid
wastes.
If the composition of the organic material is
known, the relation between COD and VS content
can be calculated by setting up the stoichiometry
of complete oxidation. As an example the relation
is derived below for glucose (Equations (3) and
(4)):
C6 H12 O6 M 180 6O2 M 32 ! 6CO2 6H2 O
Composition
type
Carbohydrate
Protein*
Lipids
Ethanol
Acetate
Propionate
(C6H10O5)n
C5H7NO2
C57H104O6
C2H6O
C2H4O2
C3H6O2
COD/VS
CH4 yield
CH4 yield
CH4
g-COD/g-VS
STP l/g-VS
STP l/g-COD
(%)
1.19
1.42
2.90
2.09
1.07
1.51
0.415
0.496
1.014
0.730
0.373
0.530
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.35
50
50
70
75
50
58
126
Bo;th
a8 b4 22:4
12n a 16b
n
2
lCH4
STP
g-VS
11
127
Xss;batch t Xss;added 1 fh
fh Xss;added e
kh t
12
Xss;batch t Xss;added 1 fh
kh t 13
Xss;added fh
128
household wastes contain much higher organic
contents that wastewaters normally contain.
6.4. Inhibition of the process
The experimentally determined methane potential
can be underestimated in cases where waste contains toxicants or the process is overloaded. In
such cases dilution of the waste will result in more
accurate determination of the methane potential.
7. Conclusions
Anaerobic biodegradation is a complex process
and the biological approach to determining
anaerobic biodegradation or methane potentials
leads to substantial uncertainty in the determination. Therefore, the determination procedure
should be carefully considered, anaerobic optimal
growth conditions secured and results carefully
evaluated.
References
Adani F, Calcaterra E & Malagutti L (2001). Preparation of
a test for estimating biogas production from pretreated
urban waste. In: Proceeding Sardinia 2001 Eight International Waste Management and Landll Symposium, Cagliari, Italy
APHA (1992) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water
and Wastewater. American Public Health Association,
Washington, DC
Angelidaki I & Ahring BK (1992) Eects of free long chain
fatty acids on thermophilic anaerobic digestion. Appl.
Microbiol. Biotechnol. 37: 808812
Angelidaki I & Ahring BK (1993) Thermophilic anaerobic
digestion of livestock waste: the eect of ammonia. Appl.
Microbiol. Biotechnol. 38: 560564
Angelidaki I & Ahring BK (1994) Anaerobic digestion of
manure at dierent ammonia loads: eect of temperature.
Wat. Res. 28: 727731
Angelidaki I, Petersen SP & Ahring BK (1990) Eects of lipids
on thermophilic anaerobic digestion and reduction of lipid
inhibition upon addition of bentonite. Appl. Microbiol.
Biotechnol. 33: 469472
Batstone D (2000) High rate anaerobic treatment of complex
wastewater, Ph.D. Thesis, The university of Queensland
Buswell EG & Neave SL (1930) Laboratory studies of sludge
digestion. Illinois Div. of State Wat. Survey 30
Chaplin MF & Bucke C (1990) Enzyme Technology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Chen YR & Hashimoto AG (1978) Kinetics of Methane
Fermentation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp. 8: 269282
Chyi YT & Dague RR (1994) Eects of particulate size in
anaerobic acidogenesis using cellulose as a sole carbon
source, Water Env. Res. 66(5): 670678
129
aerobic wastewater treatment a review, Wat. Sci. Technol.
45(6): 2540
Owen MF, Stuckey DC, Healy JB, Young LY & McCarthy PL
(1979) Bioassay for monitoring biochemical methane potential and anaerobic toxicity. Wat. Res. 13: 485492
Owens JM & Chynoweth DP (1993) Biochemical methane
potential of municipal solid waste components. Wat. Sci.
Technol. 27: 114
Palmowski LM, Mundhecke RC, Muller JA & Schwedes HJ
(2001) Importance of substrate surface area in the kinetics of
organic solids degradation In: 9th World Congress Anaerobic
Digestion Antwerp September 26, Proceedings part 2, pp
163168
Pavlostathis SG & Giraldo-Gomez E (1991) Kinetics of
anaerobic treatment, Wat. Sci. Technol. 24(8): 3559
Philip H, Manoir S, Rambaud A & Philippi LS (1993) Septic
tank sludges: accumulation rate and biochemical characteristics, Wat. Sci. Technol. 28(10): 5764
Rozzi A & Remigi E Anaerobic biodegradability. In: 9th World
Congress, Anaerobic digestion 2001. Belgium, Workshop 3
Harmonisation of anaerobic activity and biodegradation
assays. 9-2-2001. Conference Proceeding
Sanders WTM, Geerink M, Zeeman G & Lettinga G (2000)
Anaerobic hydrolysis kinetics of particulate substrates, Wat.
Sci. Technol. 41(3): 1724
Sanders WTM, Veekens AHM, Zeeman G & Lier van JB
(2002a) Analysis and optimization of the AD process of
OFMSW. In: Mata-Alvarez J (Ed) Biomethanization of the
Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Wastes (pp 6389).
IWA publishing, London