Brunei Shell Petroleum Company Sendirian Berhad

PDMS Model Review Report

FGCS & CO2 Blending Skid
Champion Compression Upgrade Project

AUTHOR: Siemens Pte Ltd

OWNER: Brunei Shell Petroleum Company Sdn Bhd

Classification

REV

XXXXX

Project Document No

Restricted

01
Doc. Type: Model Review
Report

Brunei Shell Petroleum Company Sendirian Berhad

Party

Ref Ind

Name

Sign

Date

Author(s)

XXX

XXX

Checker

XXX

XXX

Approver

XXX

XXX

Signatures

Rev.

Issue Status

01

IFC

Description / Reason for Update

Date
XXXX

Issued for Comments

Revision Record

Document Title: PDMS Model Review Report

Doc Number: XXX

Revision:
Rev Date:
Page 2 of 14

XX
XX

Brunei Shell Petroleum Company Sendirian Berhad

Distribution
The document owner is responsible for distribution control. The original electronic version is stored in
LiveLink and accessible via BSP OnLine web site. Paper copies are only controlled if they are physically
stamped Controlled Hard Copy and signed by the related remote location document controller
Document Control (BSP-02-Procedure-001)

Notice and Warning

Copyright 2013, Brunei Shell Petroleum Company Sendirian Berhad

This document is the property of Brunei Shell Petroleum Company Sendirian Berhad (BSP), Seria
KB3534, Negara Brunei Darussalam. Circulation is restricted to BSP and its designated associates,
contractors and consultants. It must not be copied or used for any other purpose other than which it is
supplied, without the expressed written authority of BSP.
Except where provided for purposes of contractual requirements, BSP disclaims any responsibility or
liability for any use or misuse of the document by any person and makes no warranty as to the accuracy
or suitability of the information to any third party. Any misuse of the document is redressable by BSP.

Document Title: PDMS Model Review Report

Doc Number: XXX

Revision:
Rev Date:
Page 3 of 14

XX
XX

Brunei Shell Petroleum Company Sendirian Berhad

Table of Contents

Table of Contents....................................................................................................... 4
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................... 5
2. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................. 5
3. REFERENCES ................................................................................................... 6
4. 70% MODEL REVIEW COMMENTS (DURING CD) ......... Error! Bookmark not
defined.
5. 30% MODEL REVIEW COMMENTS (DURING CD) ......... Error! Bookmark not
defined.
6. 3D-CAD MODEL CHECKLIST (DEP 30.10.05.11-Gen) ................................... 12
7. CONCLUSION .................................................................................................. 14

Document Title: PDMS Model Review Report

Doc Number: XXX

Revision:
Rev Date:
Page 4 of 14

XX
XX

Brunei Shell Petroleum Company Sendirian Berhad

1.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This document represents 30% model review of Compression module for detail design. This
is a summarized report of 30% and 70% model review workshop held during conceptual
design stage with BSP team.

2.

BACKGROUND
The Champion Compression Upgrade project is a reliability driven project in which the
existing compression capacity on champion 7 complex which consists of 6 GTs will be
replaced by 2 new compressors. In order to do this a new 8 legged platform will be installed
with utility deck, flare system and crane on which two compression modules will be placed.
The new compression platform CPCC07 will be located on the North side of CPGP07 and will
be connected to the existing champion 7 infrastructure via bridge link to CPGP07.

Figure 1 Overview Champion 7 complex

The compression modules will comprise of two gas turbines (LM2500) which will drive two,
three stage, compressors. All related process equipment like scrubbers, coolers and utility
systems for the module like lube-oil system will be contained within the modules.
The conceptual design for the jacket, utility deck and bridge has been executed in-house
BSP by AED department. The conceptual design for the compression modules will be
completed by Siemens.
The main objectives of the project are:

Restore production uptime to Top Quartile levels

Document Title: PDMS Model Review Report

Doc Number: XXX

Revision:
Rev Date:
Page 5 of 14

XX
XX

Brunei Shell Petroleum Company Sendirian Berhad

Reduce Opex on existing machines and keep the current system fit for operations
longer (avoiding obsolescence and Capex upgrade projects)

Increase offshore effective compression effective capacity from current levels to cater
for future projects in East.

3.

REFERENCES
Reference Documents
Number / Identification

4.

Title

Add UEFS
Add all GA drgs of Vessels

60% Model Review Comments

Model Snap

SIEMENS/ BSP
Comments

Acti
on
by

Stairs & Interconn.

Platforms are
loose shipped.
Required handling
provisions to be
provided for
connecting the
loose pipes

Sie
men
s

Ladders located
on north & south
direction of the
skid has to be relocated due to
clash with existing
bracing

Sie
men
s

Document Title: PDMS Model Review Report

Doc Number: XXX

ROS Response

Remarks

Revision:
Rev Date:
Page 6 of 14

XX
XX

Brunei Shell Petroleum Company Sendirian Berhad

Tapping for CO2

Analyzer has to
be relocated
following UEFS
Note.7
(5Dupstream & 2D
minimum straight
length)

Provide access for

flow indicators of
CO2 analyzer
FICA-1001 &
FICA-1002

Sie
men
s

Dresser Rand
Confirmed that
Nitrogen
Pressure 180
Barg for water
mist package is
acceptable.

Extend A-7410
platform @ 3m to
the edge of Skid
A-7400 to provide
access to
instruments

Sie
men
s

Noted.

Process to ensure
the minimum
straight length
requirement for
Co2 Analyzer is
modeled

Sie
men
s

Noted.

Re-locate the
sampling valve to
accessible
location

Sie
men
s

8mm thick roof

plate will be used

Manual sampling
point for all
analyzers has to
be modeled based
on Hazop
recommendation

BSP

Flare Tie-Ins has

to be re-located
based on the
comments

Sie
men
s

Sie
men
s

Document Title: PDMS Model Review Report

Doc Number: XXX

Noted

Revision:
Rev Date:
Page 7 of 14

XX
XX

Brunei Shell Petroleum Company Sendirian Berhad

10

Locate Tie-In TP326 from 74UZV1005 to Flare

Header

To
Sie
men
s

Noted.

11

Model the bleed

manual valve in
between BAFF219 &
BAFF-218

Sie
men
s

Noted. Already
discussed and
clarified with BSP
Structural
Engineer Eko

12

Reduce the
elevation of
74UZV-1005 to
accessible
location

Sie
men
s

13

Branch out the

BDV line 50B74001-63831-NN
from common line

Sie
men
s

Noted.

14

Relocate
spectacle blind
SB-201 based on
Hazop
recommendation

Sie
men
s

Attached.

15

Based on model,
the orientation of
Gearbox BAFF209 shall be
confirmed with the
Vendor

BSP

Provided in the
latest Platform,
Staircase and
Ladder
Arrangement
Drawing

Document Title: PDMS Model Review Report

Doc Number: XXX

Submitted.

Revision:
Rev Date:
Page 8 of 14

XX
XX

Brunei Shell Petroleum Company Sendirian Berhad

16

Model the
Walkway with
volume

Sie
men
s

INFO

17

Update model of
74UZV-1101 valve
as per actual valve
type

Sie
men
s

Noted.

18

Model the actuator

of valve 74UZV1101

Sie
men
s

Noted during
detail design.

19

All the cable

ladders shall be
modeled

20

Consider space &

model the
Terminal Box for
both Heaters

21

22

23

Model the JB
Lighting & small
power
ROS to inform Exheat on the
locations of Heater
Thermocouples
Check the
feasibility to
reduce the unused
space 600mm bet
the Pre-Heater to

Document Title: PDMS Model Review Report

Doc Number: XXX

Revision:
Rev Date:
Page 9 of 14

XX
XX

Brunei Shell Petroleum Company Sendirian Berhad

the edge of skid

24

Model J-T valve to

actual dimensions

25

Increase the
elevation of pipe
to accommodate
the Piping support
& grating
thickness

26

Model the
supports as per
BSP standards

27

Model PCV-1101
as per piping spec

28

Model Filter
nozzles based on
latest Filter GA
drg.

29

Model all level

nozzles in the filter

30

31

32

33

Relief Vent nozzle

shall be updated
in the Filter GA
drg & UEFS resp.
Provide Fuel gas
filter separator
Internal detail drgs
Model QOC of
Filter separator
based on actual
dimensions
Update Temp.
transmitter model
to Coriolis type

Document Title: PDMS Model Review Report

Doc Number: XXX

Revision:
Rev Date:
Page 10 of 14

XX
XX

Brunei Shell Petroleum Company Sendirian Berhad

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

Model slope
wherever
applicable
Model BDV
bypass line 50B74110-13451-NN
as per UEFS
Update UEFS
based on latest
pipe routing

Model Filter drain

nozzle N3 based
on Filter GA drg

Update actuator
model based on
Bettis catalogue
Check DEP to
provide the access
hole at the filter
vessel skirt
Lifting lugs for
Vessel has to be
modeled

41

Model drain valve

of Instrument air at
the lowest point

42

As per BSP
standards, Drip
pan shall be SS

43

Provide Tie-in for

CO2 Analyzer
vent to flare

Document Title: PDMS Model Review Report

Doc Number: XXX

Revision:
Rev Date:
Page 11 of 14

XX
XX

Brunei Shell Petroleum Company Sendirian Berhad

Additional points
-

5.

3 elbows provided for CO2 analyzer apart from minimum straight length requirement. If actual
straight length is more than minimum straight length, then the elbows can be eliminated.
CO2 analyzer venting tie-in point to be shown in model & P&ID
CO2 analyzer should be able to isolate for maintenance. To confirm whether 74QIA-1001 /
1002 have any internal sampling point (18-07 hazop recommendation)
Instrument air supply to CO2 analyzers to be shown in model & P&ID
74UZV-1005 outlet TP-326 connected wrongly to flare sub header. This should be an
independent tie-in. To be updated in model.
74UZV-1005 inlet isolation and bleed valve to be shown as per P&ID
74UZV-1005 tapping to be on the common line before distributing to two skids
To indicate nozzle number for filter separator RV tapping in P&ID. RV tapping should be just
below the top compartment
All nozzles for filter separator should be rechecked in model. P&ID, GA drawing and model to
be consistent.
Top liquid outlet nozzle should be taken from top compartment, model shown wrongly.
Superheater outlet flowmeter to be updated as Coriolis in model & P&ID
All shutdown valves symbol to be updated in model with actuator.
74UZV-1201 bypass tapping to be taken from BDV inlet line, bypass outlet can be connected
to flare header if not possible to connect to BDV outlet line. P&ID to be updated.
All PSV / BDV outlet lines to flare header to be updated in P&ID as per model routing
Maintenance drain from equipments to closed drain header to be updated in P&ID as per
model routing
Isolation valve at closed drain header TP-314 to be confirmed. General Hazop
recommendation for all nodes
Preheater / Superheater local start / stop switches to be provided and updated in P&ID. If
local stop is provided, how emergency local stop is different from normal local stop. Two local
stop button may not be required. P&ID to be updated accordingly
Flare should have three TP points, TP-326, TP-310 & TP-410 in model to connecting flare
header.

3D-CAD MODEL CHECKLIST (DEP 30.10.05.11-Gen)

This are the checkpoints are given for the review of a 3D-CAD block model in DEP 30.10.05.11-Gen.
The checklist will help to improve quality and to identify and eliminate potentially hazardous
situations.

The checklist has been filled-in by SIEMENS in consultation with BSP piping Lead.
5.5.2

Overall site plan

Document Title: PDMS Model Review Report

Doc Number: XXX

Revision:
Rev Date:
Page 12 of 14

XX
XX

Brunei Shell Petroleum Company Sendirian Berhad

General Layout considerations

5.5.2.1

Is the proposed set-up logical and optimal with respect

to process integration?

5.5.2.2

Are roads properly defined with respect to their logical

approach to unit(s)? Consider also the Movements area,
including its marine location and rail and road
connections. Include road dimensions, considering main
roads (unrestricted) and restricted access roads.

5.5.2.3

Is erection possible during construction: furnaces,

columns, large vessels, reactors, air-cooled heat
exchanger structures, flare header and flare plot?

5.5.2.4

Have area classification requirements been taken into

account?

5.5.2.5

Is the location of the Utilities area logical and optimal in

relation to the process units?

5.5.2.6

Is the location of the Movements area logical and

optimal in relation to the process units?

5.5.2.7

Is the prevailing wind direction considered in relation to

the location of tank farms, LPG storage or gas plants,
buildings, stacks, flare and oil collecting systems, like
sewers, oil catcher basins, air cooler banks and areas
containing H2S or HF?

5.5.2.8

Has a sterile area been provided around the flare stack?

5.5.2.9

Have appropriate separation distances been taken into

account between units, storage areas and buildings as
well as public fences?

5.5.2.10

Have interfaces for future extensions been considered?

5.5.2.11

Have main maintenance and storage areas been taken

into account?

5.5.2.12

Have existing underground obstructions been identified

and implemented in the model

As
applicable

5.5.2.15

Lifting path
for
compression
Module

Revision:
Rev Date:
Page 13 of 14

Remark

5.5.2.14 Have main crane locations and lifting paths been indicated
in the model

Document Title: PDMS Model Review Report

Doc Number: XXX

NA

5.5.2.13 Has demolition scope been indicated in the layout

Are the battery limit locations been identified and/ or any

major interface connection (i.e. large cool water lines,
firewater lines, etc.)

XX
XX

Brunei Shell Petroleum Company Sendirian Berhad

5.5.3

Process Units
General Layout considerations

5.5.3.1

Have separation distances within the plot area been taken into account?
Consider furnace, column, main equipment, flare, any vent outlet to 'safe
location', oil collecting area like sewers

5.5.3.2

Is the routing of the main piping in bridges and via trenches defined?

5.5.3.3

Is the location of the battery limit specified (by unit or complex)?

5.5.3.4

Is a maintenance area available e.g. for pulling of heat exchangers bundles?

5.5.3.5

Is a maintenance area available for furnace tube pulling?

5.5.3.6

Is a maintenance area available for removal of large pieces of rotating

equipment such as compressors or gas turbines? Is a protective compressor
building required?

5.5.3.7

Are there sufficient maintenance access ways available towards large air
coolers

5.5.3.8

Is the area sufficient for e.g. catalyst or solid handling activities?

5.5.3.9

Is the paving designed to support heavy equipment and cranes?

5.5.3.10

Is sufficient lay down area available?

6.

NA

CONCLUSION

The 30% model review comments (Summarized of 30% & 70% during CD) are updated as required
and all comments are closed.
The model will be updated based on the detail design developments and model review with BSP
team.

Document Title: PDMS Model Review Report

Doc Number: XXX

Revision:
Rev Date:
Page 14 of 14

XX
XX