Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
NeuroImage
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ynimg
Review
Natbrainlab, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, London SE5 8AF, UK
UMR_S 975, CNRS UMR 7225, Centre de Recherche de l'Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle pinire, Groupe Hospitalier Piti-Salptrire, 75013 Paris, France
c
Natbrainlab, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Department of Neuroimaging, London SE5 8AF, UK
d
NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK
b
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Accepted 20 May 2013
Available online xxxx
Keywords:
Connectome
Connection
Diffusion
Tractography
Hodology
Networks
a b s t r a c t
Connectome is a term with a short history but a long past. Since the origins of neuroscience the concept of a
map of neural connections has been a constant inspiring idea for those who believed the brain as the organ
of intellect. A myriad of proto-connectome maps have been produced throughout the centuries, each one
reecting the theory and method of investigation that prevailed at the time. Even contemporary denitions
of the connectome rest upon the formulation of a neuronal theory that has been proposed over a hundred
years ago. So, what is new? In this article we attempt to trace the development of certain anatomical and
physiological concepts at the origins of modern denitions of the connectome. We argue that compared to
previous attempts current connectomic approaches benet from a wealth of imaging methods that in part
could justify the enthusiasm for nally succeeding in achieving the goal. One of the unique advantages of contemporary approaches is the possibility of using quantitative methods to dene measures of connectivity
where structure, function and behaviour are integrated and correlated. We also argue that many contemporary maps are inaccurate surrogates of the true anatomy and a comprehensive connectome of the human
brain remains a far distant point in the history to come.
2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Contents
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Early proto-connectome maps (Table 1) . . . .
Modern cartography (Table 2) . . . . . . . . .
Contemporary and future connectomes between
Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . .
macroscopic
. . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
metaphors and microscopic myths
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Introduction
The pattern of scientic investigation cannot be understood in
isolation: it must be set against the background of wider trends in
the sciences, methodological advancements, and general culture of
the time (Clarke and Jacyna, 1987). Social, biological, and technological
network models dominate contemporary approaches to complexity
(Egerstedt, 2011). Telecommunications, social networks, transportation
logistics, molecular interactions, and metabolic pathways are just some
examples in which network analysis is used to described complex
dynamics (Sporns, 2011; Strogatz, 2001).
Corresponding author at: Natbrainlab, PO50 Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London SE5 8AF, UK.
E-mail address: m.catani@iop.kcl.ac.uk (M. Catani).
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
0
0
0
0
0
0
1053-8119/$ see front matter 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.109
Please cite this article as: Catani, M., et al., Connectomic approaches before the connectome, NeuroImage (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.neuroimage.2013.05.109
Table 1
Milestones in the history of neuroscience from Renaissance to the end of 19th century.
MICROSCOPY
ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY/COMPUTATIONAL
1649 Rene Descartes describes the reflex as a sensorymotor mechanism for involuntary muscle contraction
1586
1664
1684
1786
1810
1736
1850
1830s
1843-45
1887
1852
NEUROANATOMY/NEUROIMAGING
1868
1870-85
Please cite this article as: Catani, M., et al., Connectomic approaches before the connectome, NeuroImage (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.neuroimage.2013.05.109
Table 2
Milestones in the history of neuroscience in the 20th century.
MICROSCOPY
ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY/COMPUTATIONAL
Julius Bernstein advances the hypothesis that the action
1902 potential results from a change in the permeability of the
axonal membrane to ions
1903
1909
1910
Oskar and Cecile Vogt work on myeloarchitectonic maps of the human frontal lobe
1937 Wilder Penfield and Edwin Boldrev describe the motor and
sensory homunculus in man
1943 Warren McCulloch and Walter Pitts propose the first
mathematical model of a neural network
1946 Donald Hebb proposes a theory for synaptic plasticity and
learning process
1952 Alan Hodgkin and Andrew Huxley publish a mathematical
model for nerve excitation
1995
NEUROANATOMY/NEUROIMAGING
The ventricular model had a long lasting inuence despite the fact that
obvious experimental evidence of its fallacy emerged during the Renaissance. Leonardo da Vinci, for example, obtained a wax cast of the ventricles that was clearly against the classical representation of the
ventricular system (Pevsner, 2002). Similarly, Vesalius showed that the
ventricular anatomy described by Galen was questionable and its doctrine did not t with the evidence from dissections (Vesalius, 1543).
From the sixteenth century the ventricular theory co-existed with a
new spirit in science based on the experimental method (Galilei, 1638)
and the renewed belief of an intimate relationship between anatomy
and function (Catani, 2007; Catani and Thiebaut de Schotten, 2012).
Post-mortem dissection became the primary method of investigation of
the nervous system and this led to important anatomical discoveries,
among them the distinction between the cerebrum (i.e. grey matter
or cortex) and the medulla (i.e. white matter) by Arcangelo Piccolomini
in 1586:
I call the cerebrum [grey matter] that whole ashen-colored body,
darkening from white, which very closely encompasses the medulla.
The medulla is the whole of the white and more solid body, which is
concealed within the ashen-colored one. Thus the cerebrum differs and
is distinguished from the medulla by color, because the cerebrum is
ashen-colored but the medulla is white; in consistency, because the cerebrum is softer and the medulla a little harder and more compact; in location, because the medulla is in the middle of the cerebrum which wholly
covers it over; also the ashen-colored body is distinguished from the
white by certain lines. The cerebrum commences everywhere by convolutions and extends as far as the corpus callosum...
This distinction has direct relevance to modern connectomics
where hubs are located in the grey matter and connections in the
white matter. This is particularly true for those approaches that use
neuroimaging and electrophysiological methods to map whole brain
networks at the macroscopic level.
The study of the white matter anatomy expanded in the seventeenth
century when many scientists recognised that white matter contains bres whose trajectories could be followed and described if specimens
were carefully prepared using all the necessary precautions (Steno,
1669):
bres must be disposed in the most artful manner, since all the
diversity of our sensations and movements depend upon them. We admire the contrivance of the bres in each muscle, and ought still more
to admire their disposition in the brain, where conned in a very small
space, each execute their particular ofces without confusion or disorder.
From these anatomical studies a new view of the white matter
emerged; no more a homogenous support structure around the ventricles, but rather a complex medium composed of tubular laments
for the passage of uid between central cells and peripheral nerves
(Descartes, 1662). These connecting laments were found to originate from the cortex (Malpighi, 1666), specialise in motor and
Please cite this article as: Catani, M., et al., Connectomic approaches before the connectome, NeuroImage (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.neuroimage.2013.05.109
sensory functions (Willis, 1664), and coordinate a wide range of behaviours, from simple reex responses to cognition (Descartes,
1664). Some of the maps of this period had little anatomical accuracy.
The gure produced by Descartes to illustrate the complexity of white
matter connections, for example, was pictorial in its representation of
a philosophical concept rather than a faithful portrait of the real
At the beginning of the nineteenth century brain maps of white matter connections became gradually more rened with differentiation of
tracts into callosal, projections and association pathways. Individual association tracts were also identied and their anatomy described in detail (Burdach, 1822; Reil, 1809, 1812). The convergence of anatomical
advancements with the progressive corticalisation of brain functions
culminated in Gall and Spurzheim's organology theory (Fig. 3). They believed that the brain is the organ of the mind and itself is made up of multiple organs, to be identied with the convolutions (Gall and Spurzheim,
1810):
The convolutions, as far as they constitute an organ, receive their bers from different regions These bres or bre bundles have a constant and uniform direction, different however in each region; they
form their own expansions and their own convolutions; they develop
Fig. 2. The beginning of the modern study of white matter connections based on methods for bre dissection. Left) Descartes' (1664) representation of the intricate system of white
matter passages in the human brain had little anatomical correspondence. Right) Vieussens (1684) used post-mortem dissections to identify white matter tracts and was the rst to
separate the centrum ovale composed of projection bres from the commissural bres of the corpus callosum, in this gure partially removed in the midline.
Please cite this article as: Catani, M., et al., Connectomic approaches before the connectome, NeuroImage (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.neuroimage.2013.05.109
Fig. 3. Organology and phrenology according to Gall and Spurzheim (1810). Left) Lateral view of a human brain where different groups of gyri are indicated with progressive numbering according to their functional specialisation (Organology). Right) Protuberances on the skull that according to the phrenological theory resulted from the progressive expansion of the underlying gyri. Please note the correspondence of the numbers between the two gures.
Fig. 4. Cortical centers and connections in the late nineteenth century dened using clinico-anatomical correlation and post-mortem dissections. Left) Cerebral centres in the human
brain dedicated to motor, somatosensory and language functions as displayed in one of the most popular neuroanatomy textbooks of the time (Testut, 1897): I) writing centre of
Exner; II) Broca's centre for speech; III) motor centre, lower limb; IV) motor centre, upper limb; V) motor centre, face and tongue; VIVII) Dejerine's centre for reading; and VIII)
Wernicke's acoustic centre for verbal comprehension. Blue and purple areas are zones of the association centres according to Flechsig (1896). Right) Dejerine's representation of the
white matter tracts of the human brain responsible for language and reading (1895). Note that at that time the exact correspondence between centres and cortical projections was
not well established.
Please cite this article as: Catani, M., et al., Connectomic approaches before the connectome, NeuroImage (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.neuroimage.2013.05.109
Fig. 5. Microscopy applied to the study of microcircuits of the hippocampus. Left) Hippocampal histology according to Camillo Golgi, inventor of the reazione nera (i.e. black reaction) method in 1873. Right) Hippocampal histology according to Santiago Ramon y Cajal (1911). Cajal also used the black reaction and introduced new concepts derived from
his anatomical observations, including the directionality of impulse propagation (here indicated by the arrows).
Fig. 6. Cortical myelogenetic maps and white matter projections according to Flechsig (1896). Left) Flechsig identied different areas according to their degree of myelination at
birth. Primordial areas are already myelinated at birth and have some correspondence with primary sensory and motor areas (densely dotted red areas). Tertiary association
areas myelinate after birth and correspond to large regions of the frontal, parietal, temporal and occipital lobes. Sparsely red-dotted areas show intermediate degrees of myelination
at birth. Right) Flechsig was able to reconstruct the trajectories of the main projection bres from his myelogenetic maps.
Please cite this article as: Catani, M., et al., Connectomic approaches before the connectome, NeuroImage (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.neuroimage.2013.05.109
Fig. 7. Early cytoarchitectonic maps of the human brain. Left) Campbell's division of the cortex in 17 elds according to the interregional differences in cortical cyto- and
myeloarchitecture (1905). Right) Brodmann's maps according to purely cytoarchitectonic criteria (1909). Note that while Campbell believed that its areas had some functional
correspondence (hence terms like visuo-sensory and visuo-psychic), Brodmann rejected any correlation between individual areas and functional localisation.
Fig. 8. Cortical divisions of the human brain and corresponding clinical syndromes according to Economo and Koskinas (1925). Left) Distribution of the ve principal types of neocortex in lateral surface of the human brain: 1. agranular, 2. frontal, 3. parietal, 4. granular, 5. polar. Right) Corresponding clinical syndromes (in German). Please note the attempt to
localise not only neurological syndromes but also psychiatric conditions (e.g. depressive vs expansive mental disorders in the frontal lobe).
Please cite this article as: Catani, M., et al., Connectomic approaches before the connectome, NeuroImage (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.neuroimage.2013.05.109
number of cells, their density, grouping in stripes and layers (Fig. 8).
The atlas is a monumental work, which, despite being considered by
many the denitive text on cortical cartography, never met the favour
of the scientic community. This is probably in part due to its encyclopaedic proportions, the lack of clear boundaries between some of the
smallest areas and possibly the general feeling against the crazy paving
school of cortical research, which peaked shortly after (Le Gros Clark,
1952).
By the mid-twentieth century the combination of histological
methods with neurophysiological techniques applied to the animal
brain provided cortical architecture with a precise functional meaning.
This approach, as exemplied in the work of Mountcastle and Powell
(1959) on the somatosensory cortex of the monkey and of Hubel and
Wiesel (1962) on the visual cortex of the cat, was based on the use of
single- or multi-unit recording, axonal tracing by means of microlesion
or dye injection and combined with the cytoarchitectural description of
sections later cut from the same brain. Key principles of cellular organisation and neuronal physiology were discovered, such as columnar organisation of the cortex and oriented receptor elds. At the same time
the use of disconnection procedures in the monkey, combined with behavioural studies, intracortical recording, and axonal tracing revitalised
a network approach to brain functions (Fig. 9) (Mishkin, 1966). New
methods became available for the identication of single axons and
their exact cortical projection and termination (Fink and Heimer,
1967; Nauta and Gygax, 1951). By the end of 1960s novel powerful
tracers were developed based on the active transport of proteins and
other elements along the axonal bres. These methods require injection
of tract tracers into a predetermined cortical or subcortical region of the
nervous system. Once injected, the tracers enter the neuron and are
transported from the body of the neuron to its terminations (i.e. anterograde direction) or in the opposite direction (i.e. retrograde direction)
(Morecraft et al., 2009). Tracer compounds would differ for their ability
Fig. 9. Connectivity maps based on animal studies. One of the advantages of animal studies is the ability to use data obtained with different methods and directly test network-based
models of brain functions using experimental approaches (e.g. disconnection lesions). Lower left) Leslie Ungerleider and Mortimer Mishkin used animal electrophysiology, axonal tracing
and lesion studies to formulate a dual stream model of visual processing (lower left) (Mishkin et al., 1983). Right) Felleman and Van Essen's (1991) projectome of the visual system showing the hierarchical connectivity of the visual areas. One of the limitations of these approaches is the inability to quantify the strength of connectivity between different areas. This means
that the arrows and lines in the diagrams could be representative of single axons or large bundles. Also these maps have been transposed to humans without a direct anatomical verication. Bailey and von Bonin (1951), for example (upper left) applied their ndings from the monkey directly to the human brain without experimental verication. The use of
tractography could help to identify equivalence and between species differences in the anatomy of these tracts (Thiebaut de Schotten et al., 2011, 2012).
Please cite this article as: Catani, M., et al., Connectomic approaches before the connectome, NeuroImage (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.neuroimage.2013.05.109
Please cite this article as: Catani, M., et al., Connectomic approaches before the connectome, NeuroImage (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.neuroimage.2013.05.109
10
that holds the key to the real working of the brain and only a
connectome map of the brain in action will capture the anatomical,
electrophysiological and computational elements of those networks
that characterise human cognition and behaviour. Although this may
seem a distant point, at the time of the submission of this paper a report
published in Nature Methods reawakened our optimism. Researchers at
the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Janelia Farm Research Campus
in Ashburn, Virginia have been able to record activity across a whole larval sh brain, detecting 80% of its 100,000 neurons (Ahrens and Keller,
2013). The imaging system relies on a genetically engineered zebrash
whose neurons make a protein that uoresces in response to uctuations in the concentration of calcium ions, which occur when nerve
cells re. A system composed of a microscope and detectors records activity from the full brain. The neurons are visible thanks to the transparency of almost the entire non-neuronal tissue of the zebrash.
Potentially this system could show the dynamics throughout the
nervous system while the zebrash engages in different behaviours
and during learning paradigms. Certainly the journey from here to application of similar methods in the human brain (perhaps with high resolution functional diffusion imaging) is a long one in the history to
come. In the meantime setting up combined imaging and postmortem histology studies of the white matter, perhaps using cuttingedge methods for network analysis at the axonal level (e.g. Polarised
Light Imaging or Clarity) (Axer et al., 2011; Chung et al., 2013) could
help us to validate our current structural methods and move more secure steps on the steep ascent of the connectome science.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Richard Joules, Stefano Sandrone and the
other members of the NatBrainLab (http://www.natbrainlab.com)
for their helpful advice on the manuscript. This work was supported
by Guy's and St Thomas Charity and the NIHR Biomedical Research
Centre for Mental Health at the South London and Maudsley NHS
Foundation Trust.
References
Ahrens, M.B., Keller, P.J., 2013. Whole-brain functional imaging at cellular resolution
using light-sheet microscopy. Nat. Methods 10, 413420.
Aldini, G., 1803. An Account of the Late Improvements in Galvanism : To which is
Added, an Appendix, Containing Experiments on the Body of a Malefactor.
Cuthell & Martin.
Axer, M., Amunts, K., Grssel, D., Palm, C., Dammers, J., Axer, H., Pietrzyk, U., Zilles, K.,
2011. A novel approach to the human connectome: ultra-high resolution mapping
of ber tracts in the brain. Neuroimage 54, 10911101.
Bailey, P., von Bonin, G., 1951. The Isocortex of Man. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
Baillarger, J.G.F., 1840. Recherches sur la structure de la couche corticale des
circonvolutions du cerveau. J.-B. Baillire.
von Bechterew, W., 1900. Les voies de conduction du cerveau et de la moelle. Storck
and Doin.
Bentivoglio, M., Mazzarello, P., 2010. The anatomical foundations of clinical neurology.
In: Finger, S., Boller, F., Tyler, K.L. (Eds.), Handbook of Clinical Neurology, vol. 95,
pp. 149168 (3rd series).
Bernstein, J., 1868. Ueber den zeitlichen Verlauf der negativen Schwankung des
Nervenstroms. Pugers Arch. 1, 173207.
Bois-Reymond, E.H.D., 1848. Untersuchungen ber thierische elektricitt. G. Reimer.
Bouillaud, J., 1825. Trait clinique et physiologique de l'encphalite. J.B. Baillire, Paris.
Broca, P., 1861. Nouvelle observation d'aphmie produite par une lesion de la partie
postrieure des deuxime et troisime circonvolutions frontales. Bull. Soc. Anat.
Paris 36, 398407.
Brodmann, K., 1909. Vergleichende Localisationslehre der Grosshirnrinde in ihren
Prinzipien dargestellt auf Grund des Zellenbaues. Barth, Leipzig.
Broyd, S.J., Demanuele, C., Debener, S., Helps, S.K., James, C.J., Sonuga-Barke, E.J.S., 2009.
Default-mode brain dysfunction in mental disorders: a systematic review. Neurosci.
Biobehav. Rev. 33, 279296.
Bullmore, E., Sporns, O., 2009. Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of
structural and functional systems. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 186198.
Burdach, K., 1822. Vom Baue und Leben des Gehirns. In der Dyk'schen Buchhandlung,
Leipzig.
Cajal, S.R. y, 1893. Manual de histologa normal y tcnica microgrca. Libreria de
Pascual Aguilar.
Cajal, S., 1911. Histologie du Systeme nerveux. A. Maloine, Paris.
Campbell, A.W., 1905. Histological Studies on the Localisation of Cerebral Function.
University Press.
Please cite this article as: Catani, M., et al., Connectomic approaches before the connectome, NeuroImage (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.neuroimage.2013.05.109
11
Please cite this article as: Catani, M., et al., Connectomic approaches before the connectome, NeuroImage (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.neuroimage.2013.05.109
12
Rosenblatt, Frank, 1958. The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage
and organization in the brain, Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory. Psychol. Rev. 65,
386408.
Schwann, T., 1839. Mikroskopische Untersuchungen ber Die bereinstimmung
in Der Struktur und Dem Wachstum Der Tiere und Panzen. G. E. Reimer,
Berlin.
Seung, S., 2012. Connectome: How the Brain's Wiring Makes Us Who We Are.
Houghton Mifin Harcourt Trade.
Sporns, O., 2011. Networks of the Brain. MIT Press.
Sporns, O., 2013. The human connectome: origins and challenges. Neuroimage
S1053S8119.
Sporns, O., Tononi, G., Kotter, R., 2005. The human connectome: a structural description
of the human brain. PLoS Comput. Biol. 1, e42.
Steno, N., 1669. Discours de Monsieur Stenon, sur l'anatomie du cerveau Messieurs de
l'Assemble, qui se fait chez Monsieur Theuenot. chez Robert de Ninuille.
Stephan, K.E., et al., 2009. Tractography-based priors for dynamic causal models.
Neuroimage 47, 16281638.
Strogatz, S.H., 2001. Exploring complex networks. Nature 410, 268276.
Takahashi, E., Song, J.W., Folkerth, R.D., Grant, P.E., Schmahmann, J.D., 2013. Detection
of postmortem human cerebellar cortex and white matter pathways using high
angular resolution diffusion tractography: a feasibility study. Neuroimage 68,
105111.
Testut, L., 1897. Trait d'anatomie humaine: anatomie descriptive, histologie,
dveloppement. O. Doin.
Thiebaut de Schotten, M., Dell'Acqua, F., Forkel, S., Simmons, A., Murphy, D.G., Catani,
M., 2011. A lateralized brain network for visuospatial attention. Nat. Neurosci.
14, 12451246.
Thiebaut de Schotten, M., Dell'Acqua, F., Valabregue, R., Catani, M., 2012. Monkey to
human comparative anatomy of the frontal lobe association tracts. Cortex 48,
8296.
Tournier, T.J.D., Calamante, F., Connelly, A., 2007. Robust determination of the bre orientation distribution in diffusion MRI: non-negativity constrained superresolved
spherical deconvolution. Neuroimage 35, 14591472.
Vesalius, A., 1543. De Humani Corporis Fabrica. Oporini, Basel.
Vieussens, R., 1685. Neurographia universalis. Jean Certe, Lyon.
Vogt, C., Vogt, O., 1926. Die vergleichend-architektonische und vergleichendreizphysiologische Felderung der Grosshirnrinde unter besonderer Bercksichtigung
der menschlichen. Naturwissenschaften 14, 11901194.
Wedeen, V.J., Rosene, D.L., Wang, R., Dai, G., Mortazavi, F., Hagmann, P., Kaas, J.H.,
Tseng, W.-Y.I., 2012. The geometric structure of the brain ber pathways. Science
335, 16281634.
Wernicke, C., 1906. Grundrisse der Psychiatrie. Thieme, Leipzig, Germany.
White, J.G., Southgate, E., Thomson, J.N., Brenner, S., 1986. The structure of the nervous system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 314, 1340.
Willis, T., 1664. Cerebri anatome: cui accessit nervorum descriptio et usus. typis Ja. Flescher,
impensis Jo. Martyn & Ja. Allestry apud insigne Campanae in Coemeterio D. Pauli.
Zilles, K., Amunts, K., 2009. Receptor mapping: architecture of the human cerebral
cortex. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 22, 331339.
Please cite this article as: Catani, M., et al., Connectomic approaches before the connectome, NeuroImage (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.neuroimage.2013.05.109