Sei sulla pagina 1di 3

Vista woes might lead us to better things

Written by Garfield Lucas

We bought a couple of IBM Lenovo 3000C200 laptop PCs in 2007 May. These are fairly average 1700MHz
laptops purchased from a UK supplier called eBuyer for around 300 quid a throw. These came preloaded
with the basic version of Windows Vista. To describe Vista's performance as dismal would be
understatement of the year.

Problems included...
1. Waiting over an hour to get the OS from pre installed state to being actually usable (and I use the word "usable"
lightly).
2. MS outlook 2002 crashed on start - seems the pre-installed Office 2007 conflicted with it.
3. Painfully slow start up, over five minutes
4. Painfully slow to do anything at all.
5. Stupid user interface with lots of unnecessary clutter that needed switching off in order to get any speed from
the machine.
So I took the "brave" step of reformatting the drive on one machine and installing Ubuntu Linux instead. Now, I have
flirted with Linux on desktop PC's for some time, though not in any serious way. Until recently Linux was not
user-friendly enough for desktop use and besides, it lacked decent applications. However I have used Linux much more
successfully on web servers for many years. Garfnet and our sister site DEOSS both run Debian Linux c/w Apache
webserver.
But things change very quickly in the IT Industry and Linux in particular has come a very long way. Besides Vista made
me so angry that I thought it was time to try one of the "new" Linuxes as a Windows replacement on a real, working
desktop. So I undertook quite a lot of research to try to establish which Linux best suited to day-to-day, desktop use in
a harsh business environment. There are many choices but in the end I opted for a Debian-based distribution called
Ubuntu.

This is what I discovered...


1. It took less than 15 minutes to install a working Ubuntu, c/w a fully working OpenOffice.
2. I then decided to Outlook with the far superior (and free) Mozilla Thunderbird. This has never crashed and
handles my huge archive of old emails far better than MS Outlook. FYI MS Outlook goes decidedly wibbly as its
*.PST file approaches 2GB.
3. Ubuntu's start up averages less than 1/3 of the time that Vista takes.

4. Applications load at a speed that I have never experienced with any Windows machine.
5. I have no problems with virus, spyware, trojans, adware etc. Remember that on many Windows PC's half your
system reources can be taken up running anti-virus, anti-spyware, firewall and other "protective" software.
6. Ubuntu, and almost all the software for iUbuntu is FREE! No strings, no spies, no adware. In fact there are none
of the "nasties" that one has come to expect with Windows.
Three months and countless installed applications later, these Ubuntu-based machines still deliver the same
performance that they did when they were new. Compare that with any version of Windoze, where machines get slower
and slower the more applications you install.
I subsequently upgraded from Ubuntu to the (IMHO) much more stylish and functional Kubuntu - featuring the KDE
desktop. KDE is one of many free desktop systems available for Ubuntu. Which one you use is purely a matter of
personal choice - something else greatly lacking in the Windows arena.
Since 2007 May, we have purchased 3 Lenovos and dumped Vista on all 3 machines in favour of Kubuntu. In addition
we are gradually migrating all our Windows PC's to Kubuntu as well. I am at my wits end with constant upgrading,
security patching of Windows operating systems. I am sorry to say that Vista is one seriously-flawed operating system
too many for us and I am utterly sick of all the broken promises from Microsoft.

(K)ubuntu has made migrating to Linux really easy for us. So easy that my non-techy girlfriend was able to install a
complete Hungarian language version of Ubuntu for her sister in Hungary, including Skype and all the other doodads,
whistles & bells in just over half an hour.
There are still issues with drivers for scanners etc, but these are gradually being resolved. Our few "must have"
Windows applications, such as ThumbsPlus, Adobe PageMaker and Microsoft Access will all run adequately on Linux by
using CrossoverOffice from Codeweavers (costs around 25 quid). Infact MS Access on Linux is actually faster than on
Windows! Seriously!
All our other data can be handled perfectly adequately using the fantastic array of free, open source applications
available for Linux - such as OpenOffice (opens and saves M$ Word, Excel & Powerpoint files), Gwenview (for managing
photos), Amorok (for MP3's) Kaffiene (for playing DVD's and other movie files).
There is also a fantastic array of free, open source educational software that is unrivalled on Windows. The support one
gets from the Ubuntu community is far superior to anything you can expect from Micro$oft.
My final comment is that anyone struggling with Vista should seriously consider one of the Ubuntu family of Linuxes
instead. My view is that if one has the hassle of learning something new then why not make this intellectual effort really
worthwhile?
My remaining niggle is that presumably I must have paid for all these unwanted Vista OEM licences? Clearly Vista is not
of merchantable quality. So I wonder how I can get my money back? I feel a letter to the Office of Fair Trading coming
on!

Links...
Ubuntu Linux...
http://www.ubuntu.com
Kubuntu Linux (Ubuntu with the KDE Desktop)
http://www.kubuntu.org
Codeweavers (developers of Crossover)...
http://www.codeweavers.com
If you need any more convincing that it is time to dump Micro$haft and its crappy overpriced products then

please read this...


http://www.winslam.com/rlaramee/microshaft/index.html
< Prev
Last Updated on Monday, 24 March 2008 01:24

Next >

Potrebbero piacerti anche