Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Composites: Part A
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/compositesa
School of Materials and Mineral Resources Engineering, Engineering Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 14300 Nibong Tebal, Seberang Perai Selatan, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
Intel Technology Sdn. Bhd., Kulim Hi-Tech Park, 09000 Kulim, Kedah Darul Aman, Malaysia
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 11 March 2011
Received in revised form 15 June 2011
Accepted 21 June 2011
Available online 28 June 2011
Keywords:
A. Nano-structures
A. Thin lms
B. Thermal properties
E. Thermosetting resin
a b s t r a c t
With the increasing interest in high density electronics packaging, dimensional scaling becomes the key
to evolution. Low coefcient of thermal expansion (CTE) thin lm composites with silica llers were fabricated using spin coating. In comparison with the conventional thin lm fabrication, spin coating has the
ability to control lm thickness and uniformity. In this paper, the mechanical and thermal properties of
the thin lm composites using micron-silica and nano-silica were compared. The 2 wt% nano-silica thin
lm composite was found to have the lowest CTE and is able to achieve an equivalent tensile strength
compared with the 15 wt% micron-silica thin lm composite. The 2 wt% nano-silica samples also gave
an equivalent thermal stability as compared with that of the 30 wt% micron-silica. Hence, with the higher
surface area to volume ratio, nano-silica shows its capability to achieve a substantial performance with a
lower weight fraction compared with l-Si.
2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Changes in the innovative material have become a potential
issue for scaling other than the changes in chip manufacturing. A
good packaging caters to the ever-increasing demand of the miniaturization in the electronics industry. Hence, the evolution of
packaging from bulk packaging to thin lm packaging takes place
in line with Moores law. According to ASTM D 882-02, a material
is considered a thin lm when its thickness is less than 0.25 mm.
With the easier processing of polymers, a exible and thin polymer
lms are made possible. Previously, polymer thin lms has only
been used in technological applications ranging from multicolor
photographic printing to paints, adhesives, index-matched optical
coatings and photoresists [1]. Apart from that, the compatibility
of polymers with different inorganic llers has made the composite
thin lm versatile in their electrical and thermal properties. The
reinforced composite thin lms had been widely used in the
electronic application such as sensor [2], solar panel [3] and touch
panel [4]. Other than that, the demand on low cost, exible and
light weight devices has also promoted the development of excircuit technology where the polymer thin lm used as printable
materials for electronic packaging [5].
In polymer thin lm fabrication, the conventional methods,
such as dip coating, solution casting, and hot press are widely used.
Although these methods involve a lower cost and a simpler
Corresponding author. Tel.: +60 4 5995262; fax: +60 4 5941011.
E-mail address: mariatti@eng.usm.my (M. Jaafar).
1359-835X/$ - see front matter 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.06.007
1433
Fabrication
control
Thickness
control
Thickness of
product
Substrate/
shape
Uniformity of
lm
Production
rate
Cost
Commercialize
Spin coating
Dip coating
Solution casting
Hot press
Complex (3 stages)
Simple
Simple
Good control
Nano to micron
Micron
Micron
Flat substrate
Flat substrate
Poor
Good
Fast
The high loading of silica leads to the increase in the viscosity of the
system and causes difculty to the fabrication process. Additionally, the high loading of large size silica llers often result in rougher surface and lower lm exibility.
With the increasing interest in nanoscience and nanotechnology, there are footprints of polymer nanocomposites in the scientic research and engineering applications. Due to its extremely
small size and large surface to volume ratio, nano-sized llers
induce different properties compared with micron-sized llers of
the same chemical composition [17]. This broadened the application of nanocomposites in the microelectronics eld [18,19]. Moreover, the exibility of thin lm composites at a high loading of
nano-sized ller was reported to remain the same with the low
loading [5]. This results in the possibility of the fabrication of
epoxy/silica thin lm composites. In terms of thermal properties,
the smaller nano-sized inorganic llers show an improvement in
CTE compared with the micron-sized llers [20]. The high surface
area per unit volume of this nanocomposite shows a better efciency in reducing the CTE compared with the micron-composite.
However, reports on the fabrication of low CTE thin lm nanoand microcomposites are still lacking.
In this paper, low CTE thin lm epoxy composites were fabricated using the spin coating method. The tensile properties, CTE,
and thermal stability of the thin lm epoxy nano- and microcomposites were studied. The effect of the size of llers and its loading
towards the mechanical and thermal properties of thin lm composites were discussed.
2. Experimental work
2.1. Materials
The epoxy used in the thin lm composite fabrication was EPON
8281 from Hexion while the curing agent used was polyetheramine EC 301 from BASF. The spherical silica powder (l-Si) grade
SS-0020 with mean particle size of 4.83 lm was supplied by
KOSEM and the fumed nano-silica (n-Si) grade S5130 with a mean
size of 7 nm was supplied by Sigma Aldrich.
dn D
The l-Si and n-Si were dried in the oven at 110 oC for 2 h before
mixing with the curing agent. For the comparison between the effects of ller size, the loading of the l-Si in the epoxy resin was
varied from 5 wt% to 30 wt% while the n-Si was varied from
0.5 wt% to 6 wt%. These loadings are assumed to be comparable
"
6f
1=3
#
1
IA=V
2.2. Methods
Cheapest
Difcult due to difculty in
thickness control
6f
D
1434
thermal properties such as the CTE and thermal stability, the Perkin Elmer Thermomechanical Analyzer (TMA) Pyris 7 and Perkin
Elmer Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) Pyris 6 were used,
respectively. For the TMA test, a heating rate of 10 C/min under
a static force of 1.0 mN was used from room temperature to
300 C. For the TGA test, the neat epoxy thin lm and thin lm
composite samples were analyzed from room temperature to
600 C under a heating rate of 10 C/min.
Fig. 1. Tensile modulus and strength for thin lm composites with different loading
of l-Si (5 wt%30 wt%) and n-Si (0.5 wt%6 wt%) llers. (For interpretation of the
references to colour in this gure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of
this article.)
Table 2
Specic surface area (SSA), calculated values of nearest neighbour spacing (dn) and
epoxy/ller interface area per volume unit (IA/V) for both l-Si and n-Si in thin lm
composites.
a
b
Fillers
SSA (m2/g)
fa
Db (m)
dn (m)
IA=V (km2/m3)
5 wt% l-Si
15 wt% l-Si
30 wt% l-Si
1 wt% n-Si
2 wt% n-Si
6 wt% n-Si
28.70
28.70
28.70
390 40
390 40
390 40
0.03
0.08
0.17
0.23
0.38
0.65
4.83E06
4.83E06
4.83E06
7.00E09
7.00E09
7.00E09
8.43E-06
4.20E06
2.19E06
2.21E09
1.89E10
13.6E10
0.03
0.10
0.21
197.14
325.71
557.14
1435
Fig. 2. SEM image of tensile fracture surface for thin lm composite with (a) 0 wt% or neat epoxy, (b) 2 wt% n-Si, (c) 6 wt% n-Si, (d) 15 wt% l-Si, (e) 30 wt% l-Si (SEM, 2500
for (a) and 30,000 for (b), (c) and 5000 for (d), (e)).
Table 3
Coefcient of thermal expansion (CTE) and glass transition temperature (Tg) for neat
epoxy thin lm and different loading of l-Si and n-Si thin lm composites.
Sample
Tg (C)
85.4
87.12
95.0
103.0
89.3
86.2
82.85
After Tg (ppm/C)
47.5
42.5
17.7
15.1
18.3
6.7
6.9
352.4
339.7
70.5
96.1
192.2
177.7
169.4
1436
Fig. 3. TGA thermogram together with enlarged TGA thermogram from 340 C to 420 C for different loading of l-Si (5 wt%30 wt%) and n-Si (1 wt%6 wt%) thin lm
composites. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this gure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Table 4
Initial decomposition temperature (IDT) and temperature at maximum rate of weight
loss (Tmax) for neat epoxy thin lm and different loading of l-Si and n-Si thin lm
composites.
Sample
IDT (C)
Tmax (C)
334
350
349
360
323
360
359
390
391
389
392
385
392
390
more polymer segments. There will be more restriction of the polymer segment motions in the n-Si thin lm composites and the
chain transfer reaction will be suppressed. Even a small amount
of the n-Si are also able to produce better stability of the lled
composite. However, there is no signicant increment in the Tmax
for all the l-Si and n-Si thin lm composites due to the absence
of the strong chemical bonding between the inorganic ller and
the polymer chain. The silica ller was only physically adsorbed
to the epoxy resins, which is proven in the SEM image of the tensile
fracture surface in Fig. 2.
4. Conclusion
Low CTE thin lm composite was successfully fabricated using
the spin coating method. With the incorporation of silica llers,
the tensile and thermal properties of the thin lm composites
can be enhanced. Small amounts of n-Si can achieve a similar TS
with those of l-Si. For example, the 2 wt% n-Si thin lm composite
and the 15 wt% l-Si thin lm composite recorded approximately a
38% rise in their TS compared with the neat epoxy thin lm. In
comparison with the neat epoxy thin lm, 2 wt% and 6 wt% n-Si
thin lm composites obtain lower aG value with a drop of 86%
while the aG for the 30 wt% l-Si thin lm composite is only able
to decrease by 68%. Thus, n-Si proved its ability to achieve substantial mechanical and thermal properties at a lower weight fraction
compared with the l-Si. As for the thermal stability, both the maximum loading of l-Si and n-Si thin lm composites show a small
positive shift in IDT from 334 C to 359 C. However, the Tmax did
not increase signicantly. The overall thermal stability of the
epoxy/silica thin lm composite did not effectively enhance without the presence of a coupling agent.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledges Intel Technology (M) Sdn.
Bhd. for awarding the Intel Research Grant (Grant No.: 6050175)
and Universiti Sains Malaysia for providing the Postgraduate
Research University Grant (Grant No.: 8043020) that made this
study possible. The main author would like to thank Intel Technology (M) Sdn. Bhd. for granting her the Intel fellowship.
References
[1] Ade H, Winesett DA, Smith AP, Anders S, Stammler A, Heske C, et al. Bulk and
surface characterization of a dewetting thin lm polymer bilayer. Appl Phys
Lett 1998;73(25):37757.
[2] Lillemose M, Spieser M, Christiansen NO, Christensen A, Boisen A. Intrinsically
conductive polymer thin lm piezoresistors. Microelectron Eng 2008;85(5
6):96971.
[3] Itoh E, Suzuki I, Miyairi K. Field emission from carbon-nanotube-dispersed
conducting polymer thin lm and its application to photovoltaic devices. Jpn J
Appl Phys 2005;44(1B):63640.
[4] Wang Y, Jing X. Transparent conductive thin lms based on polyaniline
nanobers. Mater Sci Eng B 2007;138(1):95100.
[5] Das RN, Lin H, Lauffer JM, Rowlands M, Card N, Markovich VR. Printable
Nanocomposites for Electronic Packaging, Endicott Interconnect Technologies,
Inc., 1093 Clark Street, Endicott, New York; 2008 [industry paper].
[6] Nan G. Pellicles and lms making from polymer solution. Buletinul Universiti
Petrol 2006;L8(2):99102.
[7] Yimsiri P, Mackley MR. Spin and dip coating of light-emitting polymer
solutions: matching experiment with modeling. Chem Eng Sci
2006;61(11):3496505.
[8] Seema A, Dayas KR, Varghese JM. PVDF-PZT-5H composites prepared by hot
press and tape casting techniques. J Appl Polym Sci 2007;106(1):14651.
[9] OReilly J. Epoxy/Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Nanocomposites and Thin
Films, Biomedical Science, Texas A&M University; 2008. <http://
tiims.tamu.edu/2006SummerREU/papers/Jonathan.pdf>.
[10] Liu Y, Lin Y, Chen C, Jeng R. Preparation of epoxy resin/silica hybrid composites
for epoxy molding compounds. J Appl Polym Sci 2003;90(14):404753.
[11] Frear DR. Materials issues in area-array microelectronic packaging. JOM
1999;51(3):227.
[12] Iji M, Kuichi Y. Self-extinguishing epoxy molding compound with no ameretarding additives for electronic components. J Mater Sci Mater Electron
2001;12(12):71523.
1437
[24] Raghu H, Bose S, Hahanwar PA. Effect of particle size of ller on coloration and
properties of high density polyethylene. J Miner Mater Charact Eng
2006;5(1):87100.
[25] Konsta-Gdoutos MS, Daniel IM, Metaxa Z, Cho J. Experimental analysis of nano
and engineering materials and structures. In: Proceedings of the 13th
international conference on experimental mechanics. Greece, July, 2007. p.
434.
[26] Liu Y, Li S. Using silica nanoparticles as curing reagents for epoxy resins
to form epoxysilica nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci 2005;95(5):
123745.
[27] Popelar SF. A parametric study of ip chip reliability based on solder fatigue
modelling. In: Symposium of 20th IEEE/CPMT international electronics
manufacturing technology. Texas, October, 1997. p. 29907.
[28] Qu J, Wong CP. Effective elastic modulus of underll material for ip-chip
applications. IEEE T Compon Pack T 2002;25(1):535.
[29] Vo HT, Todd M, Shi FG, Shapiro AA, Edwards M. Towards model-based
engineering of underll materials: CTE modeling. Microelectron J
2001;32(4):3318.
[30] Lai YH, Kuo MC, Huang JC, Chen M. On the PEEK composites reinforced
by surface-modied nano-silica. Mater Sci Eng A 2007;458(12):
15869.
[31] Qiu J, Zhang C, Wang B, Liang R. Carbon nanotube integrated multifunctional
multiscale composites. Nanotechnology 2007;18 (27) 275708:(111).
[32] Li Y, Fu S, Li Y, Pan Q, Xu G, Yue C. Improvements in transmittance, mechanical
properties and thermal stability of silica-polyimide composite lms by a novel
sol-gel route. Compos Sci Technol 2007;67(1112):240816.
[33] Kuljanin J, Vuckovic M, Comor MI, Bibic N, Djokovic V, Nedeljkovic JM.
Inuence of CdS-ller on the thermal properties of polystyrene. Eur Polym J
2002;38(8):165962.