Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Markers of Infection?
DEWI DIAN SUKMAWATI
Tropical and Infectious Diseases Division of Internal Medicine Department.
Sanglah Teaching Hospital Faculty of Medicine, Udayana University
Acute febrile illness defined as non specific terms for any illness of sudden onset
accompanied by fever. The fever, elevation in core body temperature above the daily
range for an individual, can be a characteristic feature of most infection: either bacterial,
viral, fungal or protozoan; and also found in a number of noninfectious diseases such as
autoimmune or auto-inflammatory diseases. In the process of making a diagnosis,
clinical history and physical examination has been the cornerstone of teaching medical
student, navigator and analytical foundation in diagnostic process. A good clinical skill
protects patients from unnecessary investigations with the risk of false positive results
and clinical risks that these investigations entail. Diagnostic study including laboratory
evaluation will add to focus diagnosis.
An ideal marker for bacterial infections should allow an early diagnosis, give
insight into the course and prognosis of a disease and able to facilitate the therapeutic
decision. Despite the advanced development in laboratory and diagnostic study,
currently no ideal markers were available for diagnosis of bacterial infection. The
diagnosis of bacterial infection will continue require critical clinical skills, careful history
taking, physical examination and culture for diagnosis confirmation.
storage pool size thus the capacity to develop Neutrophilia in response for
bacterial infection is impaired.
Infection by Gram positive bacterial, usually present with Neutrophilia due
to increased of activated complement products, G-CSF, and pro-inflammatory
cytokines TNF-, IL-1 and IL-6. Some bacterial infection with insidious onset with
the present of splenomegaly (Typhoid fever, brucellosis) characteristically without
Neutrophilia, except in the beginning of disseminated phase. Neutrophilia in
chronic infection is maintained by increased in myeloid cells proliferation and
expansion of post-mitotic pool. Miliary tuberculosis should be one of differential
diagnosis for cases presenting with leukemoid reactions.
Infections due to Gram negative bacteria, especially the ones with septic
condition can cause either Neutrophilia or Neutropenia. Neutropenia occurs
when mature neutrophils being mobilized from marrow to circulation faster than
the proliferation. This condition picture the marrow with extreme shift to the left or
maturation arrest. Usually the Neutropenia in this setting accompanied with
thrombocytopenia and disturbance in coagulation profile. These changes depend
on the stage of sepsis, rate of peripheral consumption and bone marrow reserve.
The hematological disturbances are transient (may overshoot sometime before
settling) if we able to manage and control the septic condition. The first sign of
hematological improvements is often in normalization of thrombocytopenia.
2. Neutropenia
Neutropenia may be present in acute or chronic bacterial, viral, parasitic,
or rickettsial diseases. Infection due to exotoxin or endotoxin producing bacteria
(S.aureus, S.pyogenes, gram negative bacteria) frequently associated with
neutropenia or normal WBC with shift to the left (immature form) of WBCs. The
mechanisms are variable: direct damage to hematopoietic precursor cell
(infectious mononucleosis, hepatitis, HIV); bone marrow microenvironment
disturbance, especially stromal cell or fibroblast infection (CMV); infection of
endothelial cells (rickettsial, babesia) may cause pancytopenia due to
generalized vasculitis process; increased neutrophils adherence to damaged
endothelial cells (dengue, measles); increased mobilization and outstrip supply
(gram negative sepsis); splenic sequestration and marrow suppression (chronic
infection: TB, brucellosis, typhoid fever; malaria, kala-azar)
3. Lymphocytosis
If patient presents with fever and Lymphocytosis, the peripheral blood
smear is mandatory to differentiate between reactive Lymphocytosis or
lymphoproliferative disorder. Reactive Lymphocytosis may be seen in
mononucleosis syndrome (EBV, CMV, toxoplasmosis, viral hepatitis, HIV).
Pertussis due to Bordatella pertussis infection also present with marked
lymphocytosis with normal morphology which happened due to a delay in Thelper exit from blood into lymphoid tissue.
4. Lymphocytopenia
Lymphocytopenia typically be seen in primary or secondary
immunodeficiency (HIV infection, prolonged steroid or immunosuppressant drugs
use, malignancy). Mild to moderate lymphopenia also common in acute sepsis,
the condition related with glucocorticoid release. Acute viral infections may cause
lymphopenia due to direct destruction, trapping in spleen or lymph nodes, or
migration in regional / local site of viral infection (e.g. respiratory tract in
influenza).
Neutrophils to lymphocytes count ratio (NLCR) can be used to measure
the degree of systemic inflammation and predicting bacteriemia in emergency
setting. The most interesting study show the potential role of NLCR in
differentiate bacterial from viral infection which the cutoff value of 6.2 exhibit
sensitivity of 0.91 and specificity of 0.96 for bacterial infection.
5. Monocytosis
During acute bacterial infection, monocytes may increase as part of
leukocytosis, therefore the Monocytosis more significant in cases when total
WBC not increases. One fifth patients with subacute bacterial endocarditis
presented with Monocytosis, the increase of monocytes also be found in certain
viral infection (CMV), Monocytosis can be seen in resolution or convalescent
phase of acute infection.
6. Eosinophilia
Reactive Eosinophilia occurs when bone marrow proliferation of
eosinophils increase, induced by factors originating from T-lymphocytes
(cytokines IL-3, IL-5 produced in Th2 and for lesser degree in Th-1 response).
Typical infections with Eosinophilia include parasitic infection and fungal
diseases. Eosinophilia in tuberculosis or cryptococcal infection related with Th-2
response and often associated with poorly controlled infections.
bacterial infection and various inflammatory processes, the PCT level increase up to
several thousand folds. This increase and especially the course correlate with severity
of disease and mortality.
PCT is stimulated by bacterial products (endotoxin, lipopolysaccharide/LPS) and
cytokines (IL-1, IL-2, IL-6, TNF-). Plasma PCT has a half life of 2530 hours; the levels
typically increase within 36 hours of the stimulus. Higher levels are associated with
poorer prognosis. Elevated values are highly suggestive of an infection, typically
bacterial, with a systemic response (sepsis, or severe sepsis or septic shock). In healthy
people, PCT concentrations are typically below 0.05 ng/mL (see table), concentrations
can increase up to 1000 ng/mL in patients with sepsis, severe sepsis or septic shock.
Average levels of PCT increase from SIRS to septic shock, with the highest levels
associated with severe sepsis and septic shock. PCT has been shown to be a useful
tool that can aid in the diagnosis of sepsis. PCT levels can be helpful in facilitating early
diagnosis thus allowing for early therapeutic interventions that have been shown to
improve patient outcomes.
0.5 <2.0
2.0 <10
10
Possible causes
Normal value
Local inflammation or infection is possible, SIRS unlikely
On first day admission in ICU, indicates a low risk for progression to
severe sepsis and or septic shock
SIRS due to infection, or severe trauma, or major surgery, or
cardiogenic shock
If the patient has proven infection, it could be sepsis
Likely to be sepsis or severe systemic inflammation response due to
infection
On first day admission in ICU, indicates high risk for progression to
severe sepsis and or septic shock
Severe sepsis or septic shock
Organ dysfunction
High risk of death
The PCT optimal cutoff ranges are variable and depend on: the clinical setting
(primary care, emergency room, ICU, post operative or trauma patients), the site and
REFERRENCES
1. de Jager C. et al. The neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio in patients with
community
acquired
pneumonia. PLoS
ONE. 2012;7:e46561.
doi:
10.1371/journal.pone.0046561
2. Holub M, Beran O, Kasprikova N, Chalupa P. Neutrophil to Lymphocyte count
ratio as a biomarker of bacterial infection. Cent. Eur.J.Med.2011