Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Q1) Do you consider data essential for day to day working of your company?
Chart 1
Importance of Data
49%
Not a priority
38%
Low Priority
Medium Priority
High Priority
Essential
10%
2%
1%
Table 1
Not a priority
Low Priority
Medium Priority
High Priority
Essential
11
55
43
Explanation:
38% of the companies said that data is essential for the day to day working of the
company to add to this 49% the companies said data is of high priority for them. Hence it can
be easily said that 77% of the companies consider data of great importance. And only 3% of
the companies said data is of least priority.
Inference:
Data is of great importance for a company. Its importance is only getting increased
year after year. The improved operational systems have been ensuring that importance of data
will only increase in spite of automated reports being generated by various ERPs and other
softwares. The numbers obtained here will give a short glimpse of how important data is for a
company. More than 3/4th of the correspondent companies acknowledged that fact that data is
of at most importance. And only 3% regarded data as a non-essential part of a business.
Rarely
50
51
50
Sometimes
Always
49
43
39
36
34
31
27
34
32
26
21
24
21
15
14
7 7
7
2
Laptop
harddisk
Often
PC harddisk
13 13
4
PenDrives
Server
Harddisk
2 3
CD DVD
Roms
Memmory
Cards
Table 2
Never
Rarely
Sometimes
Often
Always
21
27
50
PC hard disk
14
39
50
Pen Drives
36
51
15
31
21
13
13
34
CD DVD Roms
32
43
26
Memory Cards
34
49
24
Explanation:
Most preferred data storage device continues to be the Hard disk of Personal
Computer with 50 correspondents stating that they always store data in the Company Desktop
and another 39 correspondents claiming that they often store data in the company desktop.
The second most preferred data storage device is the laptop hard disk. 50 correspondents said
they use laptop hard disk to store data of the company. The third most preferred choice of
data storage device is Server hard disk with 34 correspondents proclaiming that they store
data in server hard disk. CD DVD ROMS and Memory cards are used very rarely to store
data. While pen drives are being used by 51 correspondents to occasionally store important
data.
Inference:
It can be easily inferred from the graph that Hard disk is the main data storage device
used by various companies to store data. Desktop or PC hard disk still continues to be the
data storage device being used by companies. Laptop hard disk is getting more and more
prominence as the secondary data storage device. Server hard disks are seemingly useful as
the desirable data storage device especially in the IT companies and more advanced
companies with efficient systems in place. Pen drives though they enjoy popularity are never
considered a reliable data storage device. It may be due to the frequent misplacing of pen
drives or may be because of the lower capacity. The same problem can be applicable to
Memory cards. Memory cards are not being used as a reliable data storage device apart from
photographers or digital studios. CD DVD roms have become obsolete as numbers of
companies that use CD DVD Roms are very rare.
Rarely
Sometimes
Often
Always
15
56
26
11
PC hard disk
12
59
31
Pen Drives
19
27
49
15
63
40
CD DVD roms
29
39
38
Memory cards
30
43
32
Chart 3
Rarely
Sometimes
Always
63
59
56
Often
49
40
31
15
19
12
11
4
Laptop
Harddisk
32
15
9
2
1
PC harddisk
30
29
27
26
43
39 38
Pendrives
5
0 0
Server
Harddisk
CD DVD
roms
6
1
1
Memmory
cards
Explanation:
As the graph shows rarely do companies comes across damaged data storage devices
ie yearly once or twice. The hard disks of laptop, desktop rarely gets damaged more than 55
companies agreed to this fact. Server Hard disks are an exception because almost 63
companies agreed to the fact that they have never come across a situation where their server
hard disk gets damaged. Pen drives are the least reliable data storage device with 49
companies agreeing to the fact they come across faulty pen drives at a monthly basis.
Inference:
The sample population does comes across faulty data storage devices. The hard disks
are not perfectly reliable source of data storage. The Server hard disk but are known for their
reliability the number of companies that reported a damage to their server on a hard disk on a
regular basis was virtually none. The Pen drives are considered to be unreliable data storage
devices when compared to the hard disks. CD DVDs are devices that get easily damaged as it
gets old. Memory cards, though are reliable they are prone to errors because of the rough
usage of the device.
30%
Others
32%
7%
31%
Table 4
AMC provider
Others
36
35
33
Explantion:
32% of companies consult their AMC provider when they come across damage to
data storage devices. 31% of companies consult 3rd party vendors to recover data from
damaged data storage device. 7% of the companies said they would consult Stellar data
recovery when they get into data loss problem.
Inference:
Only 7% of the companies consult stellar data recovery while 31% of the companies
consult 3rd party vendors to recover data from damaged data storage devices. This is an
opportunity for the company to explore. A tie up with the AMC Provider or the 3rd party
vendors in cases of Physical crashes can be of great advantage to the company.
7%
23%
33%
Very Aware
22%
Extremely Aware
Table 5
Not at all aware
Slightly Aware
Moderately Priority
Very Aware
Extremely Aware
25
25
37
17
Explanation
23% of the responders said they were not at all aware of Stellar Data Recovery. 22%
said they were slightly aware of Stellar Data Recovery. 33% said they were moderately aware
about the company while only 15% were very aware about the company. Only just 7% were
extremely aware of Stellar Data Recovery.
Inference
Only 22% of the population are aware of Stellar data Recovery. Rest 72% are largely
unaware about the company Stellar Data Recovery. This provides further scope for marketing
of brand Stellar. The potential for brand Stellar to grow is huge. Effective marketing
techniques could be utilized to improve the brand awareness of Stellar Data Recovery.
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Confidentia
Service
Customer Advertisem
Location Experience
lity
Rates
Reviews
ents
Series1 8.678571429 8.741071429 8.589285714 7.866071429 8.544642857 7.607142857 6.267857143
Expertise
Table 6
Factors / Points
10
Expertise
16
40
39
Confidentiality
12
15
38
41
Service Rates
24
34
37
Location
10
12
48
25
10
Experience
10
11
20
27
41
Customer Reviews
16
30
22
22
14
Advertisements
19
30
20
17
Explanation:
Factors taken into account while consulting a data recovery vendor were classified
into expertise, confidentiality, service rates, location, experience, customer reviews and
advertisements. Among them the most important factor taken into consideration by most was
confidentiality of the data with an average rating of 8.741 out of 10 second came expertise
with 8.678 out of 10 which was followed by Service rates with 8.589 out of 10, followed by
the experience with 8.544. Location was given an average rating of 7.866 while customer
reviews obtained an average rating of 7.607 and advertisements obtained an average of 6.26
which was the least important factor.
Inference:
The 4 important factors that were considered by companies while consulting a data
recovery vendor are Expertise, Confidentiality, Service Rates and Experience. Stellar Data
recovery has been known for the expertise they have acquired with the class 100 clean room
and wide set of software as well as hardware tools that they have. Stellar data recovery does
maintain confidentiality of data by means of contract of obligation. Stellar data recovery has
an experience close to 18 years in data recovery field which makes it one of the earliest
players in the field. The Service rates of stellar data recovery are also to be given same
importance as that of other 3 factors. Stellar gives equal importance to Location factor and
because of this they have opened branches in almost all of the major cities in India
Very Poor
Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent
16
45
36
14
Cost of Servicing
16
46
36
13
Reusability of Data
14
45
39
14
Confidentiality of Data
13
47
36
16
Overall Service
11
49
40
11
Chart 7
Poor
46
45
Fair
Good
Excellent
49
47
45
40
39
36
16
36
16
14
1
Time for Servicing
36
14
13
1
Cost of Servicing
16
14
0
Reusability of
Data
13
0
Confidentiality of
Data
11
11
1
Overall Service
Explanation
The companies are generally neither satisfied nor dissatisfied with the current service
data recovery service providers. The number of responders who choose fair as the option is
around 45+ among the sample size of 112 across all the major factors of consideration.
around 40% or 35+ responders said they are being offered good services by the service
providers. While only 10% or 13 responded that the service they get is of excellent quality.
Inference
There is a great bit of competition when it comes to kochi area. The customers in
kochi are not generally dissatisfied with their existing service providers. But still they are
expecting more from the service provider in terms of time for servicing, Cost of servicing,
confidentiality of data and Service rates. This can be considered as an opportunity for Stellar.
If Stellar data recovery could utilize their expertise in data recovery field and provide
excellent service to the customers they could easily gain a lot of customers who are just being
provided satisfactory services by the 3rd paty vendors.
11%
14%
38%
Moderately Likely
23%
Very Likely
Extremely likely
Table 8
Not at all likely
Slightly likely
Moderately Likely
Very Likely
Extremely likely
12
16
26
42
16
Explanation
38% of the responders were very likely to switch to a new data recovery vendor.23%
of the responders said they were moderately likely to switch to a new data recovery vendor.
And 14% of the data recovery vendor said they are extremely likely to switch to a new data
recovery vendor. Only 11% said they are not at all likely to switch to a new data recovery
vendor. And 14% said they are just slightly likely to switch to a new data recovery vendor.
Inference
This provides an opportunity for new players in data recovery industry. About 75% of
the population are willing to switch to a new data recovery vendor. With effective marketing
techniques this could be converted to effective customers of data recovery services. Only
25% of the customers are fully satisfied with the current data recovery solution provider.
Axis Title
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Confidentiality
Free Consultation
Media Analysis
Table 9
Confidentiality
Free Consultation
Media Analysis
59
77
19
Explanation
Free consultation remains the most important additional facility offered by data
recovery service providers. Over 80% of responders said they receive free consultations from
their service providers. Confidentiality of data is guaranteed to less than 60% of the
customers. While free pick up and drop services are offered to less than 20% of the
customers.
Inference
Stellar might be the only company to provide all four of these additional facilities to
the customer. Hence if stellar could reach to the customers highlighting these additional
services which are being offered, they could easily gain popularity among the target
audience.
Yes
No
88%
Table 10
Yes
No
14
98
Explanation
88% of the responders said they werent aware of disk sanitization services. While
only 12% of the responders were aware of the disk sanitization services.
Inference:
This is relatively an untapped market. Responders dont know the importance of
permanently deleting data from data storage devices. They usually format the device to erase
data from devices. Only 12% of the people knew that data still exist in the device even after
the device is formatted and could easily be recovered from them. Proper awareness about this
factor to the general population could be an easy way to market the brand Stellar.