Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
WP 8: ASSESSMENT OF CELLUWOOD
MATERIAL
10 beams with their lamellae glued by the final lignin resin developed in the
project (CELLUWOOD beams).
10 beams with their lamellae glued by commercial PUR.
10
11
PUR beams
12
13
14
15
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
1
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
10
16
PWF (%)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
1
10
PWF (%)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
1
10
17
Average value
SD
fS (N/mm2)
7.37
0.75
PWF (%)
66.0
16.4
All test pieces fulfilled the requirements of EN 386 (Glued laminated timber. Performance
requirements and minimum production requirements) regarding shear strength and
wood failure percentage (EN 392). These results point out very clearly that gluing Picea
abies lamellae with the lignin resin is very effective.
18
19
After each of the three cycles specified in Method A of EN 391, the total delamination
percentage and the maximum delamination percentage were 0% for all 10 samples.
Therefore, the samples fulfilled the requirements of EN 386 for glue integrity in
structures of service class 3.
Considering this and the results from EN 392, all samples fulfilled the requirements of
EN 386 regarding glue line integrity and strength for structures of service class 3.
Pressure vessel used by AIDIMA for the first two cycles of Method A (EN 391)
20
Two test samples after extracting them from the pressure vessel,
following Method A (EN 391).
21
22
The maximum difference in moisture content between lamellas is <2%, so the dimensional
stability of CELLUWOOD beams is excellent.
23
Volumetric shrinkage
The standards used for determining the volumetric shrinkage of CELLUWOOD beams were a
combination of UNE 56533 (Physical-mechanical characteristics of wood. Determination of
linear and volumetric shrinkage) and ISO 4858 (Wood - Determination of volumetric shrinkage)
standards.
The International Standard specifies two methods for the determination of the volumetric
shrinkage of wood. The method chosen in the project was the mercury volumenometer method,
used for test pieces of any shape.
24
25
Sample
(%)
(%)
SL (parallel to
glue line) (%)
SL (parallel to
glue line) (%)
SL (longitudinal) (%)
10.82
0.25
4.18
5.02
1.16
10.33
0.27
4.01
4.46
1.23
10.76
0.26
3.96
5.14
1.07
10.32
0.30
4.01
4.67
1.03
10.45
0.25
4.11
4.81
1.18
10.34
0.29
4.00
5.08
1.14
9.98
0.24
4.14
4.74
1.01
10.43
0.28
3.95
5.06
1.11
10.64
0.31
4.14
4.91
1.20
10
10.91
0.25
4.19
4.87
1.12
Average
10.50
0.27
4.07
4.88
1.13
Standard
deviation
0.28
0.02
0.09
0.21
0.07
The total volumetric shrinkage (10.5%) and the volumetric shrinkage coefficient (0.27%) are
significantly lower than those corresponding to Norway spruce timber used for the beams
(12.6% and 0.45%, respectively). With respect to shrinkage, CELLUWOOD beams are
appropriate for outdoor use. They have a good dimensional behaviour regarding
shrinkage, compared with standard timber.
26
Volumetric swelling
The standard used for determining the volumetric swelling of the CELLUWOOD beams was
ISO 4860 (Wood - Determination of volumetric swelling). That Internation Standard specifies
two methods for the determination of the volumetric swelling of wood. The method chosen in
the project was the mercury volumenometer method, used for test pieces of any shape.
27
Volumetric swelling: n
Sample
max (%)
n (%)
10.13
2.87
9.91
3.10
10.31
2.93
10.40
3.21
10.28
2.97
10.02
3.01
9.96
2.85
10.38
2.93
10.09
3.11
10
10.21
2.90
Average
10.17
2.99
Standard
deviation
0.17
0.12
The total volumetric volumetric swelling (10.17%) is significantly lower than those
corresponding to Norway spruce timber used for the beams (13.2%). With respect to
swelling, CELLUWOOD beams are appropriate for outdoor use. They have a good
dimensional behaviour regarding swelling, compared with standard timber.
28
29
30
31
32
LIGNIN BEAMS
33
34
RESULT
UNE 56531
498
EN 12183-1
10.4
UNE 56537
80.1
Modulus of Elasticity
UNE 56537
10160
UNE 56533
12.6
UNE 56533
0.45
UNE 56533
4.14
UNE 56533
7.78
UNE 56533
0.26
UNE 56532
0.0025
UNE 56535
476
UNE 56542
97.5
UNE 56542
95.6
UNE 56543
73.6
UNE 56538
11.6
Density
(kg/m3)
(N/mm2)
(kg/cm2)
Each value shown in the table is the average value of 30 samples (3 samples from each beam).
35
Bending strength
(N/mm2)
Global modulus of
Elasticity (N/mm2)
71.28
12580
73.12
11623
81.03
12961
4
5
76.25
68.67
12098
11483
78.24
12856
74.91
12755
66.94
12136
72.27
13546
10
78.23
13865
Average
74.09
12590
Standard
deviation
4.48
773
36
Compression strength
parallel to grain
(N/mm2)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Average
Standard
deviation
42.50
44.12
40.21
44.62
41.37
44.06
42.48
43.81
41.95
44.23
42.94
1.46
37
Compression strength
perpendicular to grain
(N/mm2)
3.93
4.19
4.23
3.91
4.11
3.85
4.18
3.96
4.12
10
3.88
Average
4.03
Standard
deviation
0.14
38
39
Shear strength
Sample
Shear strength
(N/mm2)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Average
Standard
deviation
6.60
5.51
5.93
6.07
6.23
5.79
6.01
5.86
6.33
5.98
6.03
0.30
40
41
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
21.31
20.67
19.48
20.71
21.46
19.92
20.52
19.78
20.07
21.56
Average
20.55
Standard
deviation
0.73
42
Tension strength
perpendicular to grain
(N/mm2)
1.92
1.77
1.56
1.89
1.48
1.79
1.84
1.43
1.91
10
1.42
Average
1.70
Standard
deviation
0.21
43
44
46
49
50
51
53
MOE (MPa)
24000
22000
20000
18000
MUF
PUR
16000
LIGNIN
14000
12000
10000
55
18000
The
average
MOE for
lignin
beams is
45%
greater
than the
average
MOE for
MUF
beams
17000
16000
15135
15000
14000
13000
12425
12000
11000
10000
MUF
PUR
LIGNIN
56
MOR (MPa)
75
70
65
60
MUF
PUR
55
LIGNIN
50
45
40
57
MOR (MPa)
65
61,0
The
average
MOR for
lignin
beams is
23%
greater
than the
average
MOR for
MUF
beams
60
55
51,2
50
49,6
45
40
MUF
PUR
LIGNIN
58