Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
The kinetics of the total oxidation of alkanes (methane, ethane, propane, n-butane and isobutane) over Ni, Pd, and Pt foils
was studied under fuel-lean conditions by using a recirculating batch reactor with mass spectrometry detection. Approximate firstand zeroth-order kinetics with respect to the hydrocarbon and oxygen concentrations, respectively, was observed in all cases.
Significantly slower rates were seen for methane conversion, but other subtle changes were also identified among the other hydrocarbons as well. The reactivity trends could be clearly correlated with C^H bond strengths, since higher rates were seen for the longer
and more branched hydrocarbon chains. Also, platinum was found to be the most active catalyst for the oxidation of all the compounds studied here except methane, which is oxidized faster on the nickel substrate. The variations in activity among the three catalysts were shown to be associated mostly with changes in the pre-exponential factor, not the activation energy, suggesting that they
have to do with the surface density of active sites on the surface. The nature of the active catalyst during reaction was determined by
simple inspection to be the metallic phase in the cases of Pt and Ni but an oxide layer in the case of Pd.
Keywords: total oxidation, alkanes, noble metals, kinetics, catalysis
1. Introduction
The catalytic total oxidation of hydrocarbons has
been investigated in the past in connection with a number of practical applications such as hydrocarbon detection in enclosed environments [1,2], odor control [3],
volatile organic compound removal from places such as
polymer processing, coating operations, spray painting
and offset printing [4,5], domestic [6,7] and other heating
systems [8,9], industrial boilers [10], gas turbines [11^
14], and fuel cells [15]. A renewed interest has surged in
this area recently in connection with hydrocarbon emission control from both automobiles and power plants
[16^19]. It was shown early on that noble metals, platinum and palladium in particular, are the most active for
promoting oxidation reactions, so a large effort has been
focused on studying catalysts based on those elements
[1,20^23]. Moreover, given that methane constitutes
more than 85% of the natural gas used in many modern
combustion engines and that it is the most difficult
alkane to burn, the majority of the work done over the
last decade has targeted the palladium/methane system
[24^39].
The kinetics and mechanism of the catalytic oxidation of hydrocarbons has indeed been studied extensively in the past. It has been found that the reaction
rates usually display approximately zeroth and first
order with respect to the partial pressures of oxygen
and the hydrocarbon, respectively, especially under the
fuel-lean conditions relevant to most pollution-control
* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
J.C. Baltzer AG, Science Publishers
174
3. Results
3.1. General procedures
The kinetics of the catalytic oxidation of several saturated hydrocarbons over Ni, Pd, and Pt foils were studied under fuel-lean conditions. Hydrocarbon partial
pressure between 3 and 30 Torr and oxygen partial pressure between 60 and 300 Torr were used in most experiments. The reactivity of all three metal foils for the
oxidation of each of the hydrocarbons was first investigated by a temperature-programmed oxidation method
in which the extent of the conversion was followed as the
temperature of the catalyst was ramped at a rate of about
5 K/min. Figure 1 shows a typical survey of conversion
versus temperature for the case of the oxidation of 3.5
Torr of methane with 60 Torr of oxygen over a Pd foil.
These data were used to determine an approximate lightoff temperature (the inflexion point in the graph) and to
choose the optimum temperature range to be used in
subsequent isothermal kinetic studies. For instance, in
the example in figure 1 the data show that methane conversion starts around 1050 K, lights off around 1115 K,
and becomes too fast to be measured with our set-up by
1200 K; a temperature window between 1058 and 1178
175
Figure 2. Results from a typical isothermal kinetic run for the oxidation
of alkanes on metal foils using our experimental set-up. The case presented here is that of the conversion of 3.5 Torr of methane and 80 Torr
of oxygen over a palladium sample. The total pressure of the reactor
loop was taken up to about 500 Torr with argon in order to facilitate the
operation of the recirculation pump, and the solid was then heated to a
constant temperature of 1178 K by using a commercial controller.
Periodic gas samples were analyzed by mass spectrometry via a capillary tube, the same as in the TPO experiments. Shown in this figure is
the temporal evolution of the partial pressures of methane, oxygen, and
carbon dioxide; the pressure of water, the other product, was difficult
to follow because of the high background signal in the vacuum chamber
hosting the mass spectrometer.
176
Figure 3. Illustration of the procedures followed to calculate reaction rate constants (k) from isothermal kinetic data such as those shown in
figure 2. Left: methane partial pressure versus time for the reaction between 3.5 Torr of methane and 80 Torr of oxygen over a palladium foil at
1178 K. The slope of the initial decay was divided by the initial partial pressure of the hydrocarbon to estimate the value of k. Right: semilogarithmic plot of the same data as in the left. Since the rate laws for most oxidation reactions are first order in the hydrocarbon and zeroth order in oxygen
(see figure 4 and text), these semilogarithmic plots yield (after a small induction period associated with the sample delay in our instrument) straight
lines, the slopes of which provide the value of k directly.
177
Figure 4. Pressure dependence studies for the oxidation of n-butane with oxygen over a nickel foil. Left: the pressure of the hydrocarbon was varied
from 1 to 5 Torr while that of oxygen was kept at 60 Torr to determine the approximately linear dependence between the reaction rate and the concentration of the n-butane. Right: the partial pressure of oxygen was varied between 20 and 100 Torr while keeping that of n-butane constant at 3
Torr in order to show the nearly independence of the rate on oxygen concentration in this pressure regime. All these experiments were carried out
at a total pressure of 500 Torr (by using argon as the ballast gas) and a foil temperature of 948 K. Experiments with other alkanes and metal foils
yielded similar results (table 1).
decrease with chain length. The energy barrier is particularly high for methane, for which a value of about 30
kcal/mol was measured here on all three metals. This is
in agreement with most studies, although numbers
between 18 and 48 kcal/mol have been reported in the literature [1,20,33,44,45]. Good agreement was also found
between the data obtained here for the other hydrocarbons and previous work in spite of the fact that significant deviations are evident among the different reports
(table 3): there is a particularly good match between our
data and those of Hiam et al. [48] for platinum, and not
as good but still acceptable agreement with the results of
Cullis et al. [49] for palladium. In terms of the pre-exponential factors, they were seen here to decrease with
alkane size for nickel and palladium, but to go through a
maximum in the case of platinum; their values cover the
Table 1
Parameters for the rate laws in the total oxidation of light paraffins on nickel, palladium, and platinum foils under fuel-lean conditions. The rate
a
b
PO
. The reaction conditions used were as follows: for Ni and Pd, PHC was varied between 1
is expressed by the empirical relationship R kPHC
2
and 5 Torr while keeping PO2 at 60 Torr, then PO2 was varied between 20 and 100 Torr while keeping PHC at 3 Torr; for Pt the same conditions were
used for all hydrocarbons except methane and ethane, for which PHC was varied between 10 and 30 Torr while PO2 was kept at 300 Torr, and then
PO2 was varied between 100 and 300 Torr while keeping PHC at 10 Torr. The volume of the reactor was always taken to a total pressure of 500 Torr
by using argon as the ballast gas
Nickel
methane
ethane
propane
n-butane
isobutane
Palladium
Platinum
T (K)
T (K)
T (K)
928
973
973
948
943
0.9 0.1
0.9 0.1
0.8 0.1
1.0 0.2
0.7 0.3
0.2 0.1
0.3 0.1
0.3 0.1
0:2 0.2
0.4 0.3
1178
833
753
688
718
1.0 0.1
1.0 0.1
1.0 0.1
1.0 0.1
1.1 0.1
0:1 0.1
0:1 0.1
0.0 0.2
0.0 0.2
0.0 0.2
1073
973
873
673
673
1.1 0.1
1.0 0.1
1.2 0.1
1.2 0.1
1.3 0.1
0:1 0.1
0.0 0.1
0:2 0.1
0:2 0.1
0.2 0.1
178
Figure 5. Arrhenius plots for the oxidation reaction between alkanes (methane, ethane, propane, and n- and isobutane) and oxygen on all three
metals (nickel, palladium, and platinum) studied here. Each value of k, the reaction rate constant, was determined by isothermal experiments such
as those illustrated in figures 2 and 3. The activation energies and pre-exponential factors resulting from this analysis are summarized in table 2.
Table 2
Activation energies and pre-exponential factors for the total oxidation of light paraffins on nickel, palladium, and platinum foils under fuel-lean
conditions. The reaction conditions used were as follows: for Ni and Pd, PHC 3 Torr, PO2 60 Torr, and PAr 440 Torr; for Pt,
PCH4 ;C2 H6 30 Torr, PC3 H8 5 Torr, and PC4 H10 3 Torr, PO2 300 Torr for CH4 and C2 H6 and 60 Torr for C3 H8 and C4 H10 , PAr 170 Torr
for CH4 and C2 H6 , 440 Torr for C3 H8 and C4 H10
Nickel
T range
(K)
methane
ethane
propane
n-butane
isobutane
868973
868973
843948
803943
803943
Ea
(kcal mol1 )
28.1
27.8
26.5
18.2
18.0
Palladium
A
(s1 cm2 )
1300
2700
1500
20
20
T range
(K)
10581178
693833
648753
618688
648718
Ea
(kcal mol1 )
26.7
12.4
13.4
13.0
12.5
Platinum
A
(s1 cm2 )
T range
(K)
100
2
10
10
10
7821173
573973
523873
498673
498673
Ea
(kcal mol1 )
32.1
27.3
23.3
17.0
13.4
A
(s1 cm2 )
6600
54000
540000
4900
150
179
Table 3
Comparison between the activation energies obtained here for the oxidation of hydrocarbons on noble metals and those reported previously.
All values are given in kcal/mol
Reference
Catalyst
CH4
C2 H 6
C3 H 8
n-C4 H10
iso-C4 H10
this work
[49]
[41]
[50]
palladium
foil
on Al2 O3 beads
wire
black
26.7
13.4
17
14.4
12.4
20.1
22
13.4
15.6
23
13.0
26
23.9
12.5
11.0
this work
[48]
[41]
[50]
platinum
foil
filament
wire
black
32.1
21
28.2
27.3
27.3
26
23.3
17.0
22
17.0
17.0
25
19.1
13.4
10.2
180
Figure 7. Temperature-programmed oxidation data for methane (left) and isobutane (right) on all three (Ni, Pd, and Pt) foils. All the experiments
were carried out by using 3.5 Torr of the hydrocarbon, 60 Torr of oxygen, and 440 Torr of argon, and by heating the foil at a rate of 5 K/min.
Platinum proved to be the most active catalyst for the oxidation of all the hydrocarbons used here other than methane, but methane was shown to
burn at lower temperatures on the nickel foil.
181
tion runs; (2) the reaction rates slowed down with time
and deviated significantly from first-order behavior; and
(3) the kinetic data obtained here was not as reproducible as in the other cases (notice the size of the white bar
over the O2 H2 -pretreated Ni sample in figure 8).
Apparently it is not easy for nickel to retain its metallic
state under fuel-lean oxidation conditions.
Finally, the Pt samples were cleaned sequentially with
oxygen and hydrogen as is commonly done with supported catalysts [45,54,55], and the foil remained shiny
and metallic in all cases. No reproducibility problems
were encountered with this metal.
4. Discussion
Figure 8. Determination of k (the reaction rate constants) from isothermal kinetic runs designed to probe the effect of different pretreatments
on the performance of palladium and nickel foils for the total oxidation
of saturated hydrocarbons. All these experiments were carried out with
3 Torr of propane, 60 Torr of oxygen, and 440 Torr of argon at 753 K.
Results from four types of pretreatments are reported here, namely
(from left to right), (1) none; the catalyst was used immediately after a
quick flash to 1000 K under vacuum; (2) a 5 min pre-exposure to 500
Torr of oxygen at 1000 K; (3) 5 min sequential pre-exposures to 500
Torr of oxygen and hydrogen at 1000 K; and (4) 5 min sequential
pre-exposures to 500 Torr of oxygen and carbon monoxide at 1000 K
(done for the case of palladium only). The hatched bars represent the
lower-limit values of k obtained in each case, while the white bars on
top indicate the variations seen over a number of runs and illustrate the
stability and reproducibility of the different states of the catalysts. The
initially reduced metal foils appear to always perform better, and in the
case of palladium reduction with CO yields a more reproducible
surface.
from its shiny silvery metallic appearance (Ni) to greenblack (NiOH2 O), but the activity was low: the measured
reaction rate constant was about 4 104 s1 cm2 . A
similar reactivity was seen when the catalyst was pretreated by heating it to 1000 K under 500 Torr oxygen,
even though in that case the foil was green-black from
the start. After cleaning the sample by heating to 1000 K
first under 500 Torr of oxygen and then in 500 Torr of
hydrogen, however, the measured average rate constant
was about 1:2 103 s1 cm2 , about three times larger
than in the other two cases. This change is easy to understand in view of the fact that the color of the oxygen-pretreated foil changed from green-blue (NiO) back to
shiny silvery (Ni) upon hydrogen exposures, proving
that the combined pretreatment with oxygen and hydrogen regenerates the metallic Ni surface, and that that
phase is the one active for the combustion reactions.
Three more observations are relevant to the catalytic
behavior of the nickel foil: (1) the metallic Ni surface was
seen to evolve slowly into the oxide during all the reac-
182
Acknowledgement
Financial support for this research was supplied
mainly by a grant from the National Science Foundation
(CTS-9525761). Additional funds were provided by a
seed grant from the University of California Energy
Institute.
References
[1] R.B. Anderson, K.C. Stein, J.J. Feenan and L.J.E. Hofer, Ind.
Eng. Chem. 53 (1961) 809.
[2] J.G. Firth, Trans. Faraday Soc. 52 (1966) 2566.
[3] R.E. Roberts and J.B. Roberts, J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 26
(1976) 353.
[4] A.E.R. Budd, Environ. Pollut. Manag. (1978) 13.
[5] J.J. Spivey, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 26 (1987) 2165.
[6] M.R. Dongworth and A. Melvin, 16th Int. Symp. in
Combustion, MIT, 1976, p. 255.
[7] A. Nishino, Catal. Today 10 (1991) 107.
[8] S.W. Radcliffe and R.G. Hickman, J. Inst. Fuel 48 (1975) 208.
[9] D.L. Trimm and C.W. Lam, Chem. Eng. Sci. 35 (1980) 1731.
[10] W.V. Krill, J.P. Kesselring, E.K. Chu and R.M. Kendall, Mech.
Eng. 102 (1980) 28.
[11] S.M. DeCorso, S. Mumford, R.V. Carruba and R. Heck, J. Eng.
Power 99 (1977) 159.
[12] W.C. Pfefferle, J. Energy 2 (1978) 142.
[13] B.E. Enga and D.T. Thompson, Plat. Met. Rev. 23 (1979) 134.
[14] J. Tsuji and K. Ohno, Synthesis 157 (1969) 1.
[15] J.P. Kesserling, in: Advanced Combustion Methods, ed.
F.J. Weinberg (Academic Press, New York, 1986) p. 237.
[16] J. Wei, Adv. Catal. 24 (1975) 57.
[17] K.C. Taylor, Automobile Catalytic Converters (Springer, Berlin,
1984).
[18] R.J. Farrauto, R.M. Heck and B.K. Speronello, Chem. Eng.
News (7 Sept.) (1992) 34.
[19] H.S. Gandhi and M. Shelef, in: Catalysis and Automotive
Pollution Control, eds. A. Crucq and A. Frennet (Elsevier,
Amsterdam, 1987) p. 199.
[20] J.G. Firth and H.B. Holland, Trans. Faraday Soc. 65 (1969)
1121.
[21] D.L. Trimm, Appl. Catal. 7 (1983) 249.
[22] G.I. Golodets, Heterogeneous Catalytic Reactions Involving
Molecular Oxygen, Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis
Series, Vol. 15 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1983).
[23] R. Burch and M.J. Hayes, J. Mol. Catal. A 100 (1995) 13.
[24] M. Niwa, K. Awano and Y. Murakami, Appl. Catal. 7 (1983)
317.
[25] C.F. Cullis and B.M. Williatt, J. Catal. 86 (1984) 187.
[26] R.F. Hicks, H. Qi, M.L. Young and R.G. Lee, J. Catal. 122
(1990) 295.
[27] T.R. Baldwin and R. Burch, Appl. Catal. 66 (1990) 359.
[28] P. Briot and M. Primet, Appl. Catal. 68 (1991) 301.
[29] S. Oh, P.J. Mitchell and R.M. Siewert, J. Catal. 132 (1991) 287.
[30] K. Otto, L.P. Haack and J.E. De Vries, Appl. Catal. B 1 (1992)
1.
[31] R.J. Farrauto, M.C. Hobson, T. Kennelly and E.M. Waterman,
Appl. Catal. A 81 (1992) 227.
[32] P.E. Marti, M. Maciejewski and A. Baiker, J. Catal. 141 (1993)
494.
183
[33] F.H. Ribeiro, M. Chow and R.A. Dalla Betta, J. Catal. 146
(1994) 537.
[34] E. Garbowski, C. Feumi-Jantou, N. Mouaddib and M. Primet,
Appl. Catal. 109 (1994) 277.
[35] S.S. Peri and C.R.F. Lund, J. Catal. 152 (1995) 410.
[36] R. Burch and F.J. Urbano, Appl. Catal. A 124 (1995) 121.
[37] P. Salomonsson, S. Johansson and B. Kasemo, Catal. Lett. 33
(1995) 1.
[38] S. Su, J. Carstens and A.T. Bell, 15th Meeting North American
Catalysis Society, Chicago 1997, paper D21, p. 91.
[39] K. Fujimoto, F.H. Ribeiro, M. Avalos-Borja and E. Iglesias,
15th Meeting North American Catalysis Society, Chicago 1997,
paper D23, p. 93.
[40] M.A. Accomazzo and K. Nobe, Ind. Eng. Chem. Proc. Res.
Develop. 4 (1965) 425.
[41] Y.-F.Y. Yao, Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Develop. 19 (1980)
293.
[42] A. Schwartz, L.L. Holbrook and H. Wise, J. Catal. 21 (1971)
199.
[43] C.A. M
uller, M. Maciejewski, R.A. Koeppel and A. Baiker, J.
Catal. 166 (1997) 36.
[44] R.F. Hicks, H. Qi, M.L. Young and R.G. Lee, J. Catal. 122
(1990) 280.
[45] K. Otto, Langmuir 5 (1989) 1364.
[46] J.G. McCarty, Catal. Today 26 (1995) 283.
[47] R. Burch, F.J. Urbano and P.K. Loader, Appl. Catal. A 123
(1995) 173.
[48] L. Hiam, H. Wise and S. Chaikin, J. Catal. 9/10 (1968) 272.
[49] C.F. Cullis and T.G. Nevell, Proc. Roy. Soc. London A 349
(1976) 523.
[50] V.A. Drozdov, P.G. Tsyrulnikov, V.V. Popovskii,
N.N. Bulgakov, E.M. Moroz and T.G. Galeev, React. Kinet.
Catal. Lett. 27 (1985) 425.
[51] M.F.M. Zwinkels, S.G. J
aras and P.G. Menon, Catal. Rev.-Sci.
Eng. 35 (1993) 319.
[52] A. Loaiza, M. Xu and F. Zaera, J. Catal. 159 (1996) 127.
[53] R.C. Weast, ed., CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics
(CRC Press, Cleveland, 1974).
[54] G.C. Bond, Catalysis by Metals (Academic Press, London,
1962).
[55] B.C. Gates, J.R. Katzer and G.C.A. Schuit, Chemistry of
Catalytic Processes (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1979).
[56] M.F. Umstead, F.G. Woods and J.E. Johnson, J. Catal. 5 (1966)
293.
[57] J.E. Johnson, J.G. Christian and H.W. Carhart, Ind. Eng.
Chem. 53 (1961) 900.
[58] J.R. Regalbuto, An Analysis of Post-Combustion Catalytic
Emissions Treatment, Gas Research Institute, Final Task Report
GRI 92/0445 (1992).
[59] Y. Moro-oka, Y. Morikawa and A. Ozaki, J. Catal. 7 (1967) 23.
[60] J. Tsuji and K. Ohno, Tetrahedron Lett. (1970) 823.
[61] K.J. Laidler, Chemical Kinetics, 3rd Ed. (Harper and Row, New
York, 1987).
[62] C.T. Rettner, H.E. Pfn
ur and D.J. Auerbach, Phys. Rev. Lett.
54 (1985) 2716.
[63] S.G. Brass and G. Ehrlich, J. Chem. Phys. 87 (1987) 4285.
[64] A.C. Luntz and D.S. Bethune, J. Chem. Phys. 90 (1989) 1274.
[65] M.C. McMaster and R.J. Madix, Surf. Sci. 275 (1992) 265.
[66] W.H. Weinberg, Langmuir 9 (1993) 655.
[67] S.S. Bharadwaj and L.D. Schmidt, J. Catal. 146 (1994) 11.
[68] M. Huff, P.M. Torniainen and L.D. Schmidt, Catal. Today 21
(1994) 113.