Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
for
REMOVING NONCONDENSABLE GASES
from
by Subcontractors :
Martin Vorum,
P.E.
and
Eugene A. Fritzler,
P.E.
for Contractor :
Midwest Research Institute
National Renewable Energy Laboratory Division
1617 Cole Boulevard
Golden, Colorado 80401
March 2000
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
March 2000
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SEQ. WORK
NO. SHEET
1
TITLE
SUMMARY
(this worksheet)
2.1
User Guide
2.2
Bases&Input
2.3
Flowsheets
2.4
CalcLogic
3.1
3.2
3.3
FigMerit Graphs
3.3a
10
3.4a
Auxiliary Graphs
11
3.4b
% SteamUse
12
3.5
Issues
13
4.1
Op's Details
14
4.2
EnFig Merit
15
4.3
$ FigMerit
16
4.3a
Alt $ FigMerit
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
17
4.3b
Present Values
18
4.4
CostData
19
SensiComp
Notes on worksheets:
There are two sets of calculations of economic figures of merit, and correspondingly two sets of plots of the figures of m
calculated the "simple payback period." This was deemed inadequate for detailed technology comparisons, so the "alt
added, which calculates net present values (NPV) for comparing gas removal options' economic benefits more precise
The payback period calculation was retained in the comparisons and brief discussion of the sensitivity cases.
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
NONCONDENSABLE GASES
from
by Subcontractors :
Martin Vorum,
P.E.
and
Eugene A. Fritzler,
P.E.
for Contractor :
March 2000
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
March 2000
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
CONTENTS
SUMMARY
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
it, and correspondingly two sets of plots of the figures of merit. The original figure of merit
adequate for detailed technology comparisons, so the "alternative economic figure of merit was
ring gas removal options' economic benefits more precisely.
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
USERS' GUIDE
The buttons below relocate the users' view to the indicated worksheet. Use these to quickly navigate the key
corresponding worksheets also have "return" buttons to come back to this central directory.
WORKSHEET
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
TITLE
2.2
Bases&Input
2.3
Shortcut
Keys
Basis
Flowsheets
Flow Sheets
3.1
Summaries
Consolidated case s
3.2
Sensitivities
3.3
FigMerit Graphs
4.1
4.2
Charts
Case Details
EnFig Merit
Engineering figure o
4.3
$ FigMerit
Economic Mierit
Economic figure of m
4.4
Cost Data
Page 2.9
11:49:44
12/05/2014
USERS' GUIDE
worksheet. Use these to quickly navigate the key sections of the spreadsheet. The
ome back to this central directory.
SUMMARY
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 2.10
11:49:44
12/05/2014
CALCULATION BASES
AND INPUT VARIABLES
Plant Operations and Economic Factors
SHADED CELLS ARE USER ADJUSTABLE
RETURN
90%
O&M
(a)
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
Salvage
(a)
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
Labor Load
(b)
-
Expense
s
(c)
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
10.00% (nominal)
2.0%
general inflation, e.g. wages, materials, equipment, etc.
2.0%
inflation (or deflation) of electricity contract price
10
15 max. time frame for present value cash flows
5
12 max. time frame for tax capture of depreciation
straight line
34.0%
re. net income after deducting expenses
$ 30.00
fully loaded, applied to above labor multiplier
The NPV calcs compensate for difference in general inflation versus electricity price inflation.
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
2.2.11
11:49:44
12/05/2014
75%
95%
50
Condenser Specification
(direct-contact)
Produced Steam/Brine
15
3
25
15%
megawatts (MW)
F , air/water approach temperature
F , hotwell vapor/water approach temperature
F , cooling water temperature rise
23%
59.25%
10%
compressor =
79% expander
75%
3%
2.5
1.5
2.5
1.5
1.5
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
ejectors
turbocompressors
eductors
reboiler system
H2S treatment system
ejectors
turbocompressors
eductors
reboiler system
H2S treatment system
These three factors are used to adapt equipment cost estimates from different times to current
values; to estimate total installed costs from bare equipment costs; and to ratio costs for a quoted
capacity to a higher or lower value for this study:
[i.e. Log (capacity ratio) x 0.6 = log (price
ratio) ]
RETURN
SITE CONDITIONS
feet
Site Elevation
4200
Atmospheric Pressure
640
mm. Hg
o
Wet Bulb Temperature
60
F.
o
Dry Bulb Temperature
74
F.
Bases for calculating process equipment performance, as listed in
Worksheets 3.1 and 3.2 -- these are offline calcs. used as input here.
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
2.2.12
11:49:44
12/05/2014
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
2.2.13
11:49:44
12/05/2014
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
2.2.14
11:49:44
12/05/2014
auxiliary
steam
Production Fluids
turbine/generator set
brine / steam
from wells and
gathering system
flash pressure
control valve
primary
separator
Spent Brine
treatment
and
reinjection
Stage 1 &
Stage 2
Ejectors
main
condenser
cooling tower
feed pumps
inter/after condensers
condenser
top right
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 2.3.15
11:49:44
12/05/2014
Geothermal
Resource
Production and
Gathering
Systems
Vacuum &
Heat
Rejection
Systems
spent
brine
Utility
Support
Systems
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 2.3.16
produced fluids
brine flow path
energy path
steam / gas flow path
11:49:44
12/05/2014
other
utilities
cooling
water from
tower
Vent to
Atmosphere
gas abatement
(e.g. for H2S)
inter/after condensers
1 Base-Case Flowsheet
Vent
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 2.3.17
11:49:44
12/05/2014
Vent
Emissions
Control
Systems
Brine/Condensate
Conditioning
Systems
Reinjection
Systems
produced fluids
brine flow path
energy path
steam / gas flow path
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 2.3.18
11:49:44
12/05/2014
RETURN
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 2.3.19
11:49:44
12/05/2014
RETURN
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 2.3.20
11:49:44
12/05/2014
ASSUME
CALCULATE
Calculate vapor/liquid
split and phase
properties
Define turbine
inlet conditions
Calculate turbine
outlet conditions
Assume gross turbine generator
set power output (I.e. 50 MW)
Calculate condenser
heat duties
Calculate vacuum
compressor discharge
conditions
Page 2.4.21
11:49:44
12/05/2014
Assume CW approach to
Tw to get min. CW temp.
Calculate Tcwlow
Assume CW temp.
rise (delta-Tcw)
Calculate Tcwhot
Assume total
pressure (Pi)
Assume pH
Calculate liquid
compositions.
Page 2.4.22
11:49:44
12/05/2014
not balanced
Check
mole balance
balanced
not balanced
not balanced
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Go to turbine
balanced
back-pressure
calc.
Page 2.4.23
11:49:44
12/05/2014
2
3
4
5
Process Data
Temperature
Deg F
lbs/hr
10
Case Description
11
12
13
14
Psia
lb/hr (after deducts listed)
in HG
15
Temperature
Deg. F
16
Generator Output
Condenser & Vacuum Systems
kW
Motive Gas Requirements
Parasitic losses
18
See reboiler
summary
data at far
right.
lb/hr
Pressure
17
Turbine Exhaust
Deg F
Eductor
19
20
21
Net kW Generator Output after deducting gas removal (only) parasitic losses
22
23
24
25
26
Process Data
Temperature
Deg F
27
lbs/hr
28
29
30
31
Case Description
Deg F
32
Psia
33
lb/hr
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.1.24
See reboiler
summary
data at far
right.
11:49:44
12/05/2014
A
34
35
lb/hr
Pressure
in HG
36
Temperature
Deg. F
37
Generator Output
38
Turbine Exhaust
39
See reboiler
summary
data at far
right.
C
kW
Motive Gas Requirements
Eductor
40
41
42
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.1.25
11:49:44
12/05/2014
44
45
46
47
Process Data
Temperature
Deg F
48
lbs/hr
49
50
51
52
Case Description
Deg F
53
Psia
54
lb/hr
55
lb/hr
56
Pressure
in HG
57
Temperature
Deg. F
58
Generator Output
59
Turbine Exhaust
kW
Motive Gas Requirements
Parasitic losses
60
See reboiler
summary
data at far
right.
Eductor
61
62
63
Net kW Generator Output after deducting gas removal (only) parasitic losses
64
65
66
67
68
Process Data
Temperature
Deg F
69
lbs/hr
70
71
72
73
Case Description
Deg F
74
Psia
75
lb/hr
76
lb/hr
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.1.26
See reboiler
summary
data at far
right.
11:49:44
12/05/2014
A
77
B
Pressure
in HG
78
Temperature
Deg. F
79
Generator Output
80
Turbine Exhaust
81
kW
Motive Gas Requirements
Eductor
82
83
84
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.1.27
11:49:44
12/05/2014
86
87
88
89
Process Data
Temperature
Deg F
90
lbs/hr
91
92
93
94
Case Description
Deg F
95
Psia
96
lb/hr
97
lb/hr
98
Turbine Exhaust
Pressure
in HG
99
Temperature
Deg. F
100
Generator Output
kW
Motive Gas Requirements
Parasitic losses
102
See reboiler
summary
data at far
right.
Eductor
103
104
105 Net kW Generator Output after deducting gas removal (only) parasitic losses
106
107
108 Summary of Case Data
109
110
Process Data
Plant Flash Inlet
111
Case Description
Temperature
Deg F
lbs/hr
114
Deg F
116
Psia
117
lb/hr
118
lb/hr
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.1.28
See reboiler
summary
data at far
right.
11:49:44
12/05/2014
A
119
Turbine Exhaust
Pressure
in HG
120
Temperature
Deg. F
121
Generator Output
Parasitic losses
kW
Motive Gas Requirements
Eductor
124
125
126 Net kW Generator Output after deducting gas removal (only) parasitic losses
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.1.29
11:49:44
12/05/2014
128
129 Summary of Case Data
130
131
Process Data
Plant Flash Inlet
132
Case Description
Temperature
Deg F
lbs/hr
135
Deg F
137
Psia
138
lb/hr
139
lb/hr
140
Turbine Exhaust
Pressure
in HG
141
Temperature
Deg. F
142
Generator Output
144
See reboiler
summary
data at far
right.
kW
Motive Gas Requirements
Eductor
145
146
147 Net kW Generator Output after deducting gas removal (only) parasitic losses
148
149
150 Summary of Case Data
151
152
Process Data
Plant Flash Inlet
153
Case Description
Temperature
Deg F
lbs/hr
156
Deg F
158
Psia
159
lb/hr
160
lb/hr
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.1.30
See reboiler
summary
data at far
right.
11:49:44
12/05/2014
A
161
Turbine Exhaust
Pressure
in HG
162
Temperature
Deg. F
163
Generator Output
Parasitic losses
kW
Motive Gas Requirements
Eductor
166
167
168 Net kW Generator Output after deducting gas removal (only) parasitic losses
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.1.31
11:49:44
12/05/2014
RETURN
2
3
With 2 stage SJAE
Turbo
with Interstage
Compressor
Direct Contact
(3-stage)
Condensers
550
550
550
550
550
2,290,750
2,290,750
2,290,750
2,290,750
2,290,750
48,772
48,772
48,772
48,772
48,772
49,917
49,917
49,917
49,917
49,917
1,176.82
1,176.82
1,176.82
1,176.82
1,176.82
10
333.81
333.81
333.81
333.81
333.81
11
114.35
114.35
114.35
114.35
114.35
12
858,240
707,107
741,446
748,118
723,874
13
110,224
90,814
95,224
2,198
92,967
14
3.42
3.43
3.42
3.27
3.42
15
117.62
117.62
117.62
117.90
117.62
16
50,003
41,198
43,198
39,697
17
170,543
116,794
2103
134,366
lb/hr
1,320,785
lb/hr
21,418
18
Biphase Eductor
19
Performance
20
s, Eductor brine repressure
pumps)
Reboiler with
2-stage SJAE
42,175
kW
3,023
2,726
2,335
3,116
50,003
22 GROUP 2
MAIN CASE
38,175
40,473
37,362
39,059
21
23
24
With 2 stage SJAE
Turbo
with Interstage
Compressor
Direct Contact
(3-stage)
Condensers
25
26
550
550
550
550
550
27
2,287,887
2,287,887
2,287,887
2,287,887
2,287,887
28
28,967
28,967
28,967
28,967
28,967
29
29,934
29,934
29,934
29,934
29,934
30
1,124.01
1,124.01
1,124.01
1,124.01
1,124.01
31
334.21
334.21
334.21
334.21
334.21
32
112.56
112.56
112.56
112.56
112.56
33
866,559
774,844
797,486
801,262
803,735
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.1.32
Reboiler with
2-stage SJAE
11:49:44
12/05/2014
34
65,365
58,447
60,155
1,305
60,626
35
3.42
3.42
3.42
3.26
3.42
36
118.41
118.41
118.41
117.92
118.41
37
49,999
44,707
46,014
42,335
38
98,633
69,073
1239
62,824
lb/hr
1,355,055
lb/hr
23,399
39
Biphase Eductor
40
Performance
41
s, Eductor brine repressure
pumps)
42
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
46,374
kW
3,025
2,735
2,513
3,394
49,999
41,682
43,279
39,821
42,980
Page 3.1.33
11:49:44
12/05/2014
43 GROUP 3
MAIN CASE
44
45
With 2 stage SJAE
Turbo
with Interstage
Compressor
Direct Contact
(3-stage)
Condensers
46
47
550
550
550
550
550
48
2,283,558
2,283,558
2,283,558
2,283,558
2,283,558
49
9,567
9,567
9,567
9,567
9,567
50
9,980
9,980
9,980
9,980
9,980
51
1,071.58
1,071.58
1,071.58
1,071.58
1,071.58
52
334.51
334.51
334.51
334.51
334.51
53
110.72
110.72
110.72
110.72
110.72
54
874,234
846,255
852,964
852,714
874,234
55
21,541
20,852
21,017
431
21,541
56
3.40
3.40
3.40
3.26
3.40
57
119.02
119.02
119.02
117.94
119.02
58
49,998
48,398
48,782
44,849
59
28,669
21,271
410
lb/hr
1,215,153
lb/hr
21,541
60
Biphase Eductor
61
Performance
62
s, Eductor brine repressure
pumps)
63
Reboiler with
2-stage SJAE
49,998
kW
3,020
2,742
2,686
3,515
49,998
45,379
46,040
42,163
46,483
64 GROUP 4
MAIN CASE
65
66
With 2 stage SJAE
Turbo
with Interstage
Compressor
Direct Contact
(3-stage)
Condensers
67
68
350
350
350
350
350
69
5,418,282
5,418,282
5,418,282
5,418,282
5,418,282
70
6,486
6,486
6,486
6,486
6,486
71
10,034
10,034
10,034
10,034
10,034
72
136.97
136.97
136.97
136.97
136.97
73
234.51
234.51
234.51
234.51
234.51
74
22.84
22.84
22.84
22.84
22.84
75
1,410,706
1,295,622
1,355,292
1,374,334
1,314,122
76
34,952
32,100
33,579
698
32,559
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.1.34
Reboiler with
2-stage SJAE
11:49:44
12/05/2014
77
3.40
3.40
3.40
3.26
3.40
78
119.02
119.02
119.02
117.94
119.02
79
50,000
45,921
48,036
41,755
46,577
80
117,936
55,415
2,119
96,584
81
Biphase Eductor
82
Performance
83
s, Eductor brine repressure
pumps)
84
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
lb/hr
3,972,435
lb/hr
6,270
kW
5,319
4,790
4,699
5,258
50,000
40,602
43,246
37,056
41,318
Page 3.1.35
11:49:44
12/05/2014
85 GROUP 5
MAIN CASE
86
87
With 2 stage SJAE
Turbo
with Interstage
Compressor
Direct Contact
(3-stage)
Condensers
88
89
350
350
350
350
350
90
5,395,099
5,395,099
5,395,099
5,395,099
5,395,099
91
19,748
19,748
19,748
19,748
19,748
92
30,065
30,065
30,065
30,065
30,065
93
141.59
141.59
141.59
141.59
141.59
94
234.23
234.23
234.23
234.23
234.23
95
23.19
23.19
23.19
23.19
23.19
96
1,398,657
1,036,288
1,218,217
1,288,512
1,035,273
97
105,976
78,519
92,304
2,109
78,442
98
3.42
3.42
3.42
3.27
3.42
99
118.46
118.46
118.46
117.93
118.46
100
49,998
37,045
43,548
39,437
101
389,825
180,440
103 Performance
Reboiler with
2-stage SJAE
6,289
37,008
363,385
lb/hr
3,889,902
lb/hr
5,249
kW
5,344
4,779
4,406
4,209
49,998
31,700
38,770
35,031
32,800
106 GROUP 6
MAIN CASE
107
108
With 2 stage SJAE
Turbo
with Interstage
Compressor
Direct Contact
(3-stage)
Condensers
109
110
350
350
350
350
350
111
5,364,701
5,364,701
5,364,701
5,364,701
5,364,701
112
33,425
33,425
33,425
33,425
33,425
113
50,053
50,053
50,053
50,053
50,053
114
146.16
146.16
146.16
146.16
146.16
115
233.85
233.85
233.85
233.85
233.85
116
23.52
23.52
23.52
23.52
23.52
117
1,384,975
835,315
1,080,100
1,199,735
808,703
118
178,383
107,587
139,115
3,537
104,160
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.1.36
Reboiler with
2-stage SJAE
11:49:44
12/05/2014
119
3.42
3.43
3.42
3.27
3.42
120
117.71
117.71
117.71
117.91
117.71
121
49,997
30,155
38,991
36,970
122
620,455
304,875
124 Performance
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
10,425
29,194
576,272
lb/hr
3,800,413
lb/hr
4,234
kW
5,345
4,761
4,103
3,334
49,997
24,809
34,231
32,867
25,860
Page 3.1.37
11:49:44
12/05/2014
127 GROUP 7
MAIN CASE
128
129
130
131
350.00
350.00
###
350.00
350.00
132
5,200,748.50
5,200,748.50
###
5,200,748.50
5,200,748.50
133
108,542.25
108,542.25
###
108,542.25
108,542.25
134
149,179.67
149,179.67
###
149,179.67
149,179.67
135
170.17
170.17
###
170.17
170.17
136
231.78
231.78
###
231.78
231.78
137
25.26
25.26
###
25.26
25.26
138
1,310,988.74
280,813.79
417,116.45
740,112.23
211,632.91
139
561,889.48
120,356.73
178,776.02
10,938.87
90,579.38
140
3.43
3.43
3.43
3.35
3.43
141
113.55
113.55
118.68
113.55
142
49,938.61
10,696.85
15,888.94
23,395.22
8,061.59
1,480,017.55
893,872.29
20,224.82
1,099,650.83
143
###
Reboiler with
2-stage SJAE
144
Biphase Eductor
3,325,258.83
145
Performance
1,154.51
kW
5,193.86
4,650.57
2,477.01
926.89
49,938.61
5,502.99
11,238.36
20,918.21
7,134.70
148 GROUP 8
MAIN CASE
149
150
151
152
550
550
550
550
550
153
2,297,151
2,297,151
2,297,151
2,297,151
2,297,151
154
99,665
99,665
99,665
99,665
99,665
155
99,557
99,557
99,557
99,557
99,557
156
1,316
1,316
1,316
1,316
1,316
157
333
333
333
333
333
158
119
119
119
119
119
159
836,338
561,822
603,645
609,385
539,248
160
226,036
151,843
163,146
4,481
145,742
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.1.38
Reboiler with
2-stage SJAE
11:49:44
12/05/2014
161
3.43
3.43
3.43
3.31
3.43
162
115
115
115
118
115
163
49,993
33,583
36,083
32,600
164
348,709
232,693
5438
297,090
lb/hr
1,231,868
lb/hr
16,376
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
32,234
kW
3,001
2,699
1,871
2,386
49,993
30,583
33,385
30,730
29,848
Page 3.1.39
11:49:44
12/05/2014
RETURN
CASE 5-a
HIGH TEMPERATURE, HIGH GAS,
2
60 DEG WET BULB
3
4
550
2,290,750
48,772
49,917
1,176.82
10
333.81
11
114.35
12
732,403
13
94062.59
14
3.42
15
117.62
16
42,672
17
141,998
18
19
20
2,755
21
39,916
CASE 5-C
22
23
HIGH TEMPERATURE, MID GAS,
60 DEG WET BULB
24
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
25
26
550
27
2,287,887
28
28,967
29
29,934
30
1,124.01
31
334.21
32
112.56
33
791,147
Page 3.1.40
11:49:44
12/05/2014
I
34
59676
35
3.42
36
118.41
37
45,648
38
81,100
39
40
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
41
2,764
42
42,884
Page 3.1.41
11:49:44
12/05/2014
CASE 5-D
44
HIGH TEMPERATURE, LOW GAS,
60 DEG WET BULB
45
46
47
550
48
2,283,558
49
9,567
50
9,980
51
1,071.58
52
334.51
53
110.72
54
851,642
55
20985
56
3.40
57
119.02
58
48,706
59
23,149
60
61
62
2,765
63
45,942
64
CASE 6 repeat
65
LOW TEMPERATURE, LOW GAS,
60 DEG WET BULB
66
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
67
68
350
69
5,418,282
70
6,486
71
10,034
72
136.97
73
234.51
74
22.84
75
1,340,848
76
33,221
Page 3.1.42
11:49:44
12/05/2014
I
77
3.40
78
119.02
79
47,524
80
71,589
81
82
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
83
4,831
84
42,693
Page 3.1.43
11:49:44
12/05/2014
CASE 6 B
86
LOW TEMPERATURE, MID GAS,
60 DEG WET BULB
87
88
89
350
90
5,395,099
91
19,748
92
30,065
93
141.59
94
234.23
95
23.19
96
1,165,938
97
88342.97
98
3.42
99
118.46
100
41,679
101
250,352
102
103
104
4,835
105
36,845
106
CASE 6 C
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
110
350
111
5,364,701
112
33,425
113
50,053
114
146.16
115
233.85
116
23.52
117
996,005
118
128284
Page 3.1.44
11:49:44
12/05/2014
I
119
3.42
120
117.71
121
35,955
122
439,068
123
124
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
125
4,835
126
31,121
Page 3.1.45
11:49:44
12/05/2014
5,200,749
133
108,542
134
149,180
135
170.17
136
231.78
137
25.26
138
351,789
139
151605.27
140
3.43
141
113.55
142
13,406
143
1,372,214
144
145
146
4,686
147
8,720
148
CASE 10c
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
152
550
153
2,297,151
154
99,665
155
99,557
156
1,316
157
333
158
119
159
593,384
160
160373.16
Page 3.1.46
11:49:44
12/05/2014
I
161
3.43
162
115
163
35,470
164
308,617
165
166
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
167
2,730
168
32,740
Page 3.1.47
11:49:44
12/05/2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
750,316
215,433
965,749
12
13
2,103
14
15
2,289,303
16
17
2,333
18
19
20
21
0.999
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
802,567
127,917
930,484
33
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.1.48
11:49:44
12/05/2014
J
34
P
1,239
35
36
2,287,396
37
38
2,513
39
40
41
42
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.1.49
1.000
11:49:44
12/05/2014
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
853,145
42,201
895,346
54
55
410
56
57
2,283,506
58
59
2,686
60
61
62
63
1.000
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
1,375,032
68,400
1,443,433
75
76
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
2,119
11:49:45
12/05/2014
77
78
5,417,883
79
80
4,699
81
82
83
84
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.1.51
1.000
11:49:45
12/05/2014
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
1,290,621
206,704
1,497,326
96
97
6,289
98
99
5,391,445
100
101
4,403
102
103
104
105
0.999
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
1,203,272
346,618
1,549,890
117
118
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
10,425
11:49:45
12/05/2014
119
120
5,354,261
121
122
4,095
123
124
125
126
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.1.53
0.998
11:49:45
12/05/2014
127
128
129
130
131 `
132
133
134
135
136
137
751,051
1,072,009
1,823,060
138
139
20,225
140
141
5,118,571
142
143
2,438
144
145
146
147
0.984
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
613,866
439,112
1,052,978
159
160
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
5,438
11:49:45
12/05/2014
161
162
2,288,591
163
164
1,864
165
166
167
168
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.1.55
0.996
11:49:45
12/05/2014
1
2
3
4
Summary of Reboiler Rates
5
6
7
lb / hr
8
9
lb / hr
10
11
lb / hr
12
13
lb / hr
14
15
lb / hr
16
17
kW
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Summary of Reboiler Rates
26
27
28
lb / hr
29
30
lb / hr
31
32
lb / hr
33
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.1.56
11:49:45
12/05/2014
Q
34
lb / hr
35
36
lb / hr
37
38
kW
39
40
41
42
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.1.57
11:49:45
12/05/2014
43
44
45
46
Summary of Reboiler Rates
47
48
49
lb / hr
50
51
lb / hr
52
53
lb / hr
54
55
lb / hr
56
57
lb / hr
58
59
kW
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
Summary of Reboiler Rates
68
69
70
lb / hr
71
72
lb / hr
73
74
lb / hr
75
76
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
lb / hr
Page 3.1.58
11:49:45
12/05/2014
77
78
lb / hr
79
80
kW
81
82
83
84
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.1.59
11:49:45
12/05/2014
85
86
87
88
Summary of Reboiler Rates
89
90
91
lb / hr
92
93
lb / hr
94
95
lb / hr
96
97
lb / hr
98
99
lb / hr
100
101 kW
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
Summary of Reboiler Rates
110
111
112 lb / hr
113
114 lb / hr
115
116 lb / hr
117
118 lb / hr
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.1.60
11:49:45
12/05/2014
119
120 lb / hr
121
122 kW
123
124
125
126
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.1.61
11:49:45
12/05/2014
127
128
129
130
Summary of Reboiler Rates
131
132
133 lb / hr
134
135 lb / hr
136
137 lb / hr
138
139 lb / hr
140
141 lb / hr
142
143 kW
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154 lb / hr
155
156 lb / hr
157
158 lb / hr
159
160 lb / hr
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.1.62
11:49:45
12/05/2014
161
162 lb / hr
163
164 kW
165
166
167
168
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.1.63
11:49:45
12/05/2014
CASE 3 Repeat
Case Description
Eductor
kW
Case Description
Page 3.2.64
Case 8 repeat
See reboiler
summary
data at far
right.
2.931E-04
11:49:45
12/05/2014
kW
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.2.65
11:49:45
12/05/2014
Case Description
CASE 5 b
Eductor
kW
Case Description
Page 3.2.66
Case 9 repeat
See reboiler
summary
data at far
right.
2.931E-04
11:49:45
12/05/2014
kW
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.2.67
11:49:45
12/05/2014
Case Description
Case 1 repeat
kW
Case Description
Page 3.2.68
Case 7 repeat
See reboiler
summary
data at far
right.
2.931E-04
11:49:45
12/05/2014
kW
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.2.69
11:49:45
12/05/2014
Base Case
550
2,290,750
48,772
49,917
1177
334
114
With 2 stage
SJAE with
Interstage
Direct Contact
Condensers
550
2,290,750
48,772
49,917
1177
334
114
858,240
110,224
3.42
118
50,003
0
639,792
82,168
3.43
118
37,276
246,503
Turbo
Compressor
Reboiler
Two Phase
Eductor
With 3 Stage
Hybrid System
550
2,290,750
48,772
49,917
1177
334
114
550
2,290,750
48,772
49,917
1177
334
114
550
2,290,750
48,772
49,917
1177
334
114
550
2,290,750
48,772
49,917
1177
334
114
741,446
95,224
3.42
118
43,198
116,794
748,118
2,198
3.27
118
39,697
2103
661,680
84,979
3.42
118
38,551
196,560
1,320,785
19,459
2,814
35,737
686,007
88,104
3.42
118
39,968
194,353
lb/hr
lb/hr
2,726
40,473
2335
37,362
2,768
37,200
CASE 8 R
Base Case
350
5,418,029
6,497
10,052
137
235
23
1,410,636
35,012
3.40
119
49,998
0
With 2 stage
SJAE with
Interstage
Direct Contact
Condensers
350
5,418,029
6,497
10,052
137
235
23
1,243,056
30,852
3.40
119
44,058
171,739
Turbo
Compressor
Reboiler
350
5,418,029
6,497
10,052
137
235
23
1,355,115
33,634
3.40
119
48,030
55,520
350
5,418,029
6,497
10,052
137
235
23
1,374,201
699
3.26
118
41,750
2123
lb/hr
Page 3.2.70
Two Phase
Eductor
350
5,418,029
6,497
10,052
137
235
23
1,268,218
31,477
3.40
119
44,950
142,418
3,972,192
With 3 Stage
Hybrid System
350
5,418,029
6,497
10,052
137
235
23
1,311,285
32,546
3.40
119
46,476
101,817
11:49:45
12/05/2014
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
lb/hr
4,790
43,240
Page 3.2.71
4,698
37,052
5,892
5,071
39,879
4,837
41,640
11:49:45
12/05/2014
Base Case
550
2,504,984
28,940
30,437
1124
344
128
929,413
71,320
5.71
137
50,026
0
With 2 stage
Turbo
Reboiler
Two Phase
With 3 Stage
SJAE with
Compressor
Eductor
Hybrid System
Interstage
Direct Contact
Condensers
550
550
550
550
550
2,504,984
2,504,984
2,504,984
2,504,984
2,504,984
28,940
28,940
28,940
28,940
28,940
30,437
30,437
30,437
30,437
30,437
1124
1124
1124
1124
1124
344
344
344
344
344
128
128
128
128
128
844,996
64,842
5.72
137
45,482
90,895
860,720
66,049
5.71
137
46,329
68,693
858,426
1,425
5.41
137
42,062
1093
lb/hr
lb/hr
2922
43,407
2696
39,367
879,194
67,466
6
137
47,323
50,220
1,503,076
31,641
3799
43,524
856,364
65,714
5.71
137
46,094
78,655
2967
43,128
CASE 9 R
Base Case
350
6,250,550
6,357
10,148
137
244
27
1,575,301
39,477
5.66
138
50,000
0
With 2 stage
SJAE with
Interstage
Direct Contact
Condensers
350
6,250,550
6,357
10,148
137
244
27
1,479,062
37,065
5.66
138
46,945
98,650
Turbo
Compressor
Reboiler
350
6,250,550
6,357
10,148
137
244
27
1,517,857
38,037
5.66
138
48,176
57,444
350
6,250,550
6,357
10,148
137
244
27
1,535,015
789
5.41
137
41,045
1599
lb/hr
Page 3.2.72
Two Phase
Eductor
350
6,250,550
6,357
10,148
137
244
27
1,506,476
37,752
5.66
138
47,815
68,825
4,635,512
With 3 Stage
Hybrid System
350
6,250,550
6,357
10,148
137
244
27
1,507,188
37,770
5.66
138
47,838
69,820
11:49:45
12/05/2014
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
lb/hr
5349
42,827
Page 3.2.73
5251
35,794
11,893
6259
41,557
5405
42,433
11:49:45
12/05/2014
LAST STAGE 23 %
CASE 1 R Sensitivity 1
Base Case
550
2,288,428
48,134
49,281
1175
334
114
With 2 stage
SJAE with
Interstage
Direct Contact
Condensers
550
2,288,428
48,134
49,281
1175
334
114
857,673
108,675
3.42
118
49,954
0
49,954
Turbo
Compressor
Reboiler
Two Phase
Eductor
With 3 Stage
Hybrid System
550
2,288,428
48,134
49,281
1175
334
114
550
2,288,428
48,134
49,281
1175
334
114
550
2,288,428
48,134
49,281
1175
334
114
550
2,288,428
48,134
49,281
1175
334
114
709,467
89,896
3.43
118
41,322
166,985
742,503
94,082
3.42
118
43,246
115,170
749,107
2,168
3.27
118
39,736
2,064
732,614
92,829
3.42
118
42,670
140,905
3,016
38,306
2,722
40,524
2,338
37,397
726,536
92,059
3.42
118
42,316
131,136
1,320,605
21,462
3,010
39,307
AST STAGE 23 %
2,756
39,914
CASE 7 R
LOW TEMPERATURE, LOW GAS, 60 DEG WET BULB 23%23%23%
Base Case
350
5,418,030
6,497
10,051
137
235
23
1,410,636
35,011
3.40
119
49,998
0
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
With 2 stage
SJAE with
Interstage
Direct Contact
Condensers
350
5,418,030
6,497
10,051
137
235
23
1,329,437
32,995
3.40
119
47,120
83,214
Turbo
Compressor
Reboiler
350
5,418,030
6,497
10,051
137
235
23
1,355,118
33,633
3.40
119
48,030
55,518
Page 3.2.74
350
5,418,030
6,497
10,051
137
235
23
1,374,203
699
3.26
118
41,751
2123
Two Phase
Eductor
350
5,418,030
6,497
10,051
137
235
23
1,342,419
33,318
3.40
119
47,580
68,217
3,972,194
With 3 Stage
Hybrid System
350
5,418,030
6,497
10,051
137
235
23
1,340,669
33,274
3.40
119
47,518
71,704
11:49:45
12/05/2014
49,998
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
5309
41,810
4790
43,241
Page 3.2.75
4698
37,052
6,269
5348
42,232
4830
42,688
11:49:45
12/05/2014
HIGH TEMPERATURE, HIGH GAS, 60 DEG WET BULB 15% SJAE EFF
750,316
215,433
965,749
2,103
2,289,303
2,333
0.999
LOW TEMPERATURE, LOW GAS, 60 DEG WET BULB .15 SJAE EFF
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.2.76
1,374,901
68,517
1,443,418
2,123
5,417,628
4,698
11:49:45
12/05/2014
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.2.77
1.000
11:49:45
12/05/2014
859,851
139,609
999,460
1,093
2,504,534
2,695
1.000
Page 3.2.78
1,535,803
77,294
1,613,097
1,599
6,250,236
5,251
1.000
11:49:45
12/05/2014
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.2.79
11:49:45
12/05/2014
751,275
212,418
963,692
2,064
2,287,028
2,337
0.999
Page 3.2.80
1,374,902
68,515
1,443,417
2,123
5,417,630
4,698
1.000
11:49:45
12/05/2014
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.2.81
11:49:45
12/05/2014
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.2.82
11:49:45
12/05/2014
RETURN
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.2.83
11:49:45
12/05/2014
lb / hr
lb / hr
kW
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.2.84
11:49:45
12/05/2014
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.2.85
11:49:45
12/05/2014
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.2.86
11:49:45
12/05/2014
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.2.87
11:49:45
12/05/2014
Case Discriminators
Plant Feed Temperatures
Flash
Inlet
o
F
Flash Outlet
to Turbine
o
F
X AXIS
Y
Noncondensable
Technical
Gas Levels in
Ratio of net plant power outp
Power Turbine
divided by corresponding net
Feed Steam
employing 2-stage steam jet
power derived by deducting p
other in-plant utilities assume
balance.
part per million
by volume
Values less than 1 indicate
ppmv
than 2-stage ejector system f
2-Stage
Steam Jet
System
Ratios of Techn
High temperature,
High temperature,
High temperature,
High temperature,
550
334
99,600
49,900
29,900
10,000
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Low temperature,
Low temperature,
Low temperature,
Low temperature,
Low gas
Mid gas
High gas
Very high gas
350
234
10,000
30,100
50,100
149,200
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.3.88
11:49:45
12/05/2014
FIGURE 70
LOW TEMPERATURE CASES -- TECHNIC
2-Stage Ejectors
Linear (2-Stage Ejectors)
Linear (2-Stage Ejectors)
3-Stage Turbo
Linear (3-Stage Turbo)
Reboiler
Linear (Reboiler)
Ba
20,000
40,000
60,000
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.3.89
11:49:45
12/05/2014
FIGURE 80
LOW TEMPERATURE CASES -- ECONOMIC
600.0
500.0
400.0
300.0
200.0
2-stage ejector system is basis for comparison for retrofit gas removal system options. Therefore, an ejector system h
100.0
0.0
10,000
30,100
NCG in Flashed S
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.3.90
11:49:45
12/05/2014
FIGURE
HIGH TEMPERATURE CASES -- TE
1.25
1.20
2-Stage Ejectors
3-Stage Turbo
Reboiler
1.15
Hybrid -- Ejector & Turbo
1.10
1.05
1.00
0
20,000
0.95
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
40,000
60,000
Page 3.3.91
11:49:45
12/05/2014
FIGU
HIGH TEMPERATURE CASES -
3-Stage Turbo
Reboiler
Biphase Eductor
40.00
35.00
Simple Payback Period for
Retrofit Gas Removal Installations
30.00
25.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
0.00
-5.00
-10.00
NCG in Flashed Ste
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.3.92
11:49:45
12/05/2014
Y AXIS
Technical Figure of Merit
Ratio of net plant power output for each gas removal option,
divided by corresponding net power from a base case system
employing 2-stage steam jet ejectors for gas removal. Net
power derived by deducting power duty for gas removal. All
other in-plant utilities assumed equal and outside of this
balance.
3-Stage
Reboiler
Biphase
Hybrid -Turbocomp.
System
Eductor
3rd Stage
System
System
Turbocomp.
Ratios of Technology Productivities
Figure 90
1.09
1.01
0.98
1.07
1.06
1.01
1.02
1.05
1.04
1.01
1.03
1.03
1.01
1.00
1.02
1.01
1.07
1.22
1.38
2.04
Figure 70
1.07
1.26
1.48
4.28
1.02
1.03
1.04
1.29
1.05
1.16
1.25
1.59
2-Stage
Steam Jet
System
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3-Stage
Reboiler
Turbocomp. System
System
Simple Payback Periods
Figure 100
30.51
86.48
8.4
-100.9
5.4
-38.7
11.4
-23.3
2.6
2.3
3.7
107.3
Figure 80
15.3
3.3
2.1
1.0
Biphase
Eductor
System
(years)
-6.30
13.5
7.6
7.7
539.1
32.5
33.3
6.8
RETURN
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.3.93
11:49:45
12/05/2014
FIGURE 70
ASES -- TECHNICAL FIGURE OF MERIT
ors)
ors)
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.3.94
11:49:45
12/05/2014
FIGURE 80
ES -- ECONOMIC FIGURE OF MERIT
3-Stage Turbo
Reboiler
Biphase Eductor
Hybrid -- Ejector &
Turbo
30,100
50,100
149,200
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.3.95
11:49:45
12/05/2014
FIGURE 90
ERATURE CASES -- TECHNICAL
e Turbo
Reboiler
FIGURE OF MERIT
Biphase Eductor
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.3.96
11:49:45
12/05/2014
FIGURE 100
GH TEMPERATURE CASES -- ECONOMIC FIGURE OF MERIT
40.00
35.00
30.00
25.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
0.00
-5.00
-10.00
NCG in Flashed Steam (ppmv)
99,600
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
49,900
Page 3.3.97
29,900
10,000
11:49:45
12/05/2014
RETURN
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.3.98
11:49:45
12/05/2014
ERIT
RETURN
20,000
140,000
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
160,000
Page 3.3.99
11:49:45
12/05/2014
3-Stage Turbo
Reboiler
Biphase Eductor
Hybrid -- Ejector &
Turbo
149,200
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.3.100
11:49:45
12/05/2014
F MERIT
100,000
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
120,000
Page 3.3.101
11:49:45
12/05/2014
MERIT
29,900
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
10,000
Page 3.3.102
11:49:45
12/05/2014
Plot Data :
Case Group Descriptions
Case Discriminators
Plant Feed Temperatures
Flash
Inlet
o
F
Flash Outlet
to Turbine
o
F
X AXIS
Y A
Noncondensable
Technical Fig
Gas Levels in
Ratio of net plant power outpu
Power Turbine
option, divided by correspond
Feed Steam
case system employing 2-stag
removal. Net power derived b
gas removal. All other in-plan
and outside of this balance.
part per million
Values less than 1 indicate te
by volume
power than 2-stage ejector sy
ppmv
2-Stage
Steam Jet
System
Ratios of Technolo
High temperature,
High temperature,
High temperature,
High temperature,
550
334
99,600
49,900
29,900
10,000
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Low temperature,
Low temperature,
Low temperature,
Low temperature,
Low gas
Mid gas
High gas
Very high gas
350
235
10,000
30,100
50,100
149,200
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
AXG-9-29432-01]
253838234.xls
Page 3.3a.103
11:49:46
12/05/2014
LOW TEMPERATURE
5.00
4.50
2-Stage Ejectors
4.00
3-Stage Turbo
Reboiler
3.50
Biphase Eductor
Hybrid -- Ejector & Turbo
3.00
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
0.50
AXG-9-29432-01]
253838234.xls
Page 3.3a.104
11:49:46
12/05/2014
NCG
3.50
Biphase Eductor
Hybrid -- Ejector & Turbo
3.00
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
0.50
NCG
AXG-9-29432-01]
253838234.xls
Page 3.3a.105
11:49:46
12/05/2014
FIGURE 8
LOW TEMPERATURE CASES -- ECONOMIC FIGU
$30,000,000
$25,000,000
$20,000,000
$15,000,000
$10,000,000
$5,000,000
$$(5,000,000)
$(10,000,000)
$(15,000,000)
20,000
40,0
3-Stage Turbo
Reboiler
Biphase Eductor
$(20,000,000)
$(25,000,000)
$(30,000,000)
$(35,000,000)
AXG-9-29432-01]
253838234.xls
Page 3.3a.106
NCG
11:49:46
12/05/2014
CALCULATION
BASES :
Nominal Discount Rate =
Project life at time of estimated NPV :
Contract Price of Electricity =
AXG-9-29432-01]
253838234.xls
Page 3.3a.107
11:49:46
12/05/2014
HIGH TEMPERATURE
1.15
2-Stage Ejectors
3-Stage Turbo
Reboiler
1.10
Biphase Eductor
Hybrid -- Ejector & Turbo
1.05
1.00
0
20,000
40,000
0.95
AXG-9-29432-01]
253838234.xls
Page 3.3a.108
NCG in
11:49:46
12/05/2014
Biphase Eductor
Hybrid -- Ejector & Turbo
1.05
1.00
0
20,000
40,000
0.95
NCG in
AXG-9-29432-01]
253838234.xls
Page 3.3a.109
11:49:46
12/05/2014
FIGURE 10
HIGH TEMPERATURE CASES -- ECONOMIC FI
$3,000,000
$2,000,000
$1,000,000
$0
20,000
$(1,000,000)
$(2,000,000)
$(3,000,000)
$(4,000,000)
$(5,000,000)
$(6,000,000)
3-Stage Turbo
Reboiler
Biphase Eductor
$(7,000,000)
$(8,000,000)
$(9,000,000)
$(10,000,000)
AXG-9-29432-01]
253838234.xls
Page 3.3a.110
NCG in Fl
11:49:46
12/05/2014
CALCULATION
BASES :
Nominal Discount Rate =
10.0%
Project life at time of estimated NPV :
10
Contract Price of Electricity = $ 0.040
AXG-9-29432-01]
253838234.xls
Page 3.3a.111
11:49:46
12/05/2014
Y AXIS
Economic Figure of Merit
The economic figure of merit for each technology in these charts is the
net present value (NPV) of the revenues versus the costs for installation
and operation of the alternative. Revenues are attributed based on
energy savings, which are estimated as the difference between the utility
demand for the alternative gas removal system compared to that of a 2stage steam jet ejector system for the same power plant.
Positive NPV values indicate the alternative gas removal system will
yield a return on investment. Negative values mean the conversion to
and operation of the alternative will lose money compared to retaining a
steam jet ejector system for gas removal. The values plotted below for
NPV are at a fixed point in time listed below the margin of the figures.
By changing the year selected, the returns on investments can be
shown after varying period of operating time.
AXG-9-29432-01]
253838234.xls
1.05
1.16
1.25
1.59
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Page 3.3a.112
11:49:46
12/05/2014
FIGURE 7
TEMPERATURE CASES -- TECHNICAL FIGURE OF MERIT
bo
00
60,000
AXG-9-29432-01]
253838234.xls
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
11:49:46
12/05/2014
bo
00
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
AXG-9-29432-01]
253838234.xls
Page 3.3a.114
11:49:46
12/05/2014
IGURE 8
-- ECONOMIC FIGURE OF MERIT
20,000
40,000
3-Stage Turbo
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
Reboiler
Biphase Eductor
Hybrid -- Ejector & Turbo
AXG-9-29432-01]
253838234.xls
Page 3.3a.115
11:49:46
12/05/2014
140,0
10.0%
10
years
$
0.040 per kWh
AXG-9-29432-01]
253838234.xls
General Inflation =
Electricity price escalation :
Tax Rate =
Page 3.3a.116
2.0%
2.0%
34.0%
11:49:46
12/05/2014
FIGURE 9
HIGH TEMPERATURE CASES -- TECHNICAL
40,000
60,000
80,000
AXG-9-29432-01]
253838234.xls
FIGURE OF MERIT
Page 3.3a.117
100,000
11:49:46
12/05/2014
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
AXG-9-29432-01]
253838234.xls
Page 3.3a.118
11:49:46
12/05/2014
FIGURE 10
ES -- ECONOMIC FIGURE OF MERIT
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
Reboiler
Hybrid -- Ejector & Turbo
AXG-9-29432-01]
253838234.xls
Page 3.3a.119
11:49:46
12/05/2014
years
per kWh
AXG-9-29432-01]
253838234.xls
General Inflation =
Electricity price escalation :
Tax Rate =
Page 3.3a.120
2.0%
2.0%
34.0%
11:49:46
12/05/2014
AXG-9-29432-01]
253838234.xls
Page 3.3a.121
11:49:46
12/05/2014
00
120,000
AXG-9-29432-01]
253838234.xls
140,000
160,000
Page 3.3a.122
11:49:46
12/05/2014
00
120,000
AXG-9-29432-01]
253838234.xls
140,000
160,000
Page 3.3a.123
11:49:46
12/05/2014
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
mv)
AXG-9-29432-01]
253838234.xls
Page 3.3a.124
11:49:46
12/05/2014
AXG-9-29432-01]
253838234.xls
Page 3.3a.125
11:49:46
12/05/2014
FIGURE OF MERIT
80,000
100,000
AXG-9-29432-01]
253838234.xls
120,000
Page 3.3a.126
11:49:46
12/05/2014
80,000
100,000
AXG-9-29432-01]
253838234.xls
120,000
Page 3.3a.127
11:49:46
12/05/2014
80,000
AXG-9-29432-01]
253838234.xls
100,000
120,000
Page 3.3a.128
11:49:46
12/05/2014
AXG-9-29432-01]
253838234.xls
Page 3.3a.129
11:49:46
12/05/2014
high temp
low temp
x-hi gas
high gas
mid gas
low gas
low gas
mid gas
high gas
x-hi gas
8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
D ri v e S te a m R e q u i re d (l b / h r)
Gas Levels
Drive Steam to Gas Removal
ppmv
Base Case3-St. Turbo Reboiler Biphase
99,557
49,917
29,934
9,980
10,034
30,065
50,053
149,180
348,709
170,543
98,633
28,669
117,936
389,825
620,455
1,480,018
232,693
116,794
69,073
21,271
55,415
180,440
304,875
893,872
5,438
2,103
1,239
410
2,119
6,289
10,425
20,225
297,090
134,366
62,824
0
96,584
363,385
576,272
1,099,651
Hybrid
308,617
141,998
81,100
23,149
71,589
250,352
439,068
1,372,214
1,600,000
1,400,000
1,200,000
1,000,000
800,000
600,000
400,000
200,000
0
0
20,000
NonConde
Le v e ls 120,000
40,000
60,000 nsable
80,000Gas100,000
in Flashe d Ste am (ppmv )
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.4.130
11:49:46
12/05/2014
140,000
16
D r iv e S t e a m R e q u ir e d ( lb /h r )
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
D r iv e S t e a m R e q u ir e d ( lb /h r )
1,600,000
1,400,000
1,200,000
1,000,000
800,000
600,000
400,000
200,000
0
0
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
Page 3.4.131
11:49:46
12/05/2014
16
Column
E
Column
F
Column
G
Column
H
Column
I
Column
E
Column
F
Column
G
nde
Le v e ls 120,000
000 nsable
80,000Gas100,000
ashe d Ste am (ppmv )
140,000
160,000
Column
H
Column
I
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.4.132
11:49:46
12/05/2014
000
Column E
Column F
Column G
Column H
Column I
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
60,000
Column E
Column F
Column G
Column H
Column I
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
160,000
Page 3.4.133
11:49:46
12/05/2014
3.4b % SteamUse
flashed steam
composition
CASE
ppmv gas
ID
H2O mass
gas mass
fraction
fraction
std. Flashed
steam
gas
lb/hr
lb/hr
0.114
858,000
total =
110,000
968,000
110,000
B1.1
3-st. turbo
49,900
0.886
0.114
858,000
B1.2
reboiler
49,900
0.886
0.114
xx
B1.3
eductor
49,900
0.886
0.114
858,000
110,000
B1.4
hybrid
49,900
0.886
0.114
858,000
110,000
xx
flashed steam
composition
CASE
ppmv gas
ID
H2O mass
gas mass
fraction
fraction
std. Flashed
steam
gas
lb/hr
lb/hr
0.070
867,000
total =
65,000
932,000
65,000
B2.1
3-st. turbo
29,900
0.930
0.070
867,000
B2.2
reboiler
29,900
0.930
0.070
xx
B2.3
eductor
29,900
0.930
0.070
867,000
65,000
B2.4
hybrid
29,900
0.930
0.070
867,000
65,000
CASE
ID
flashed steam
composition
ppmv gas
H2O mass
fraction
gas mass
fraction
xx
3.4b.134
12/05/2014
11:49:46
3.4b % SteamUse
B-3
base case
10,000
0.976
0.024
874,000
total =
22,000
896,000
B3.1
3-st. turbo
10,000
0.976
0.024
874,000
22,000
B3.2
reboiler
10,000
0.976
0.024
xx
B3.3
eductor
10,000
0.976
0.024
874,000
22,000
B3.4
hybrid
10,000
0.976
0.024
874,000
22,000
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
3.4b.135
xx
12/05/2014
11:49:47
3.4b % SteamUse
flashed steam
composition
CASE
ID
ppmv gas
H2O mass
fraction
gas mass
fraction
std. Flashed
steam
gas
lb/hr
lb/hr
0.024
1,411,000
total =
35,000
1,446,000
1,411,000
35,000
B4.1
3-st. turbo
10,000
0.976
0.024
B4.2
reboiler
10,000
0.976
0.024
B4.3
eductor
10,000
0.976
0.024
1,411,000
35,000
B4.4
hybrid
10,000
0.976
0.024
1,411,000
-
35,000
-
flashed steam
composition
CASE
ID
ppmv gas
H2O mass
fraction
xx
gas mass
fraction
xx
std. Flashed
steam
gas
lb/hr
lb/hr
0.071
1,399,000
total =
106,000
1,505,000
1,399,000
106,000
B5.1
3-st. turbo
30,100
0.929
0.071
B5.2
reboiler
30,100
0.929
0.071
B5.3
eductor
30,100
0.929
0.071
1,399,000
106,000
B5.4
hybrid
30,100
0.929
0.071
1,399,000
106,000
flashed steam
composition
CASE
ID
ppmv gas
H2O mass
fraction
B6.1
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
3-st. turbo
50,100
0.886
3.4b.136
xx
gas mass
fraction
xx
std. Flashed
steam
gas
lb/hr
lb/hr
0.114
1,385,000
total =
178,000
1,563,000
0.114
1,385,000
178,000
12/05/2014
11:49:47
3.4b % SteamUse
B6.2
reboiler
50,100
0.886
0.114
B6.3
eductor
50,100
0.886
0.114
1,385,000
178,000
B6.4
hybrid
50,100
0.886
0.114
1,385,000
178,000
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
3.4b.137
xx
xx
12/05/2014
11:49:47
3.4b % SteamUse
flashed steam
composition
CASE
ID
ppmv gas
H2O mass
fraction
gas mass
fraction
std. Flashed
steam
gas
lb/hr
lb/hr
0.300
1,311,000
total =
562,000
1,873,000
1,311,000
562,000
B7.1
3-st. turbo
149,200
0.700
0.300
B7.2
reboiler
149,200
0.700
0.300
B7.3
eductor
149,200
0.700
0.300
1,311,000
562,000
B7.4
hybrid
149,200
0.700
0.300
1,311,000
562,000
flashed steam
composition
CASE
ID
ppmv gas
H2O mass
fraction
xx
gas mass
fraction
xx
std. Flashed
steam
gas
lb/hr
lb/hr
0.213
836,000
total =
226,000
1,062,000
226,000
B8.1
3-st. turbo
99,600
0.787
0.213
836,000
B8.2
reboiler
99,600
0.787
0.213
xx
B8.3
eductor
99,600
0.787
0.213
836,000
226,000
B8.4
hybrid
99,600
0.787
0.213
836,000
226,000
xx
PLOT DATA
X AXIS
gas
loads
(ppmv)
hi temp
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
10,000
29,900
Y AXIS
3-STAGE
REBOILER
EDUCTOR
TURBO
Percent Pure Steam to Gas Removal Power
(total steam use for all gas removal duty, including reboiler vent gas)
BASE
CASE
3.2%
10.6%
3.4b.138
2.4%
7.4%
2.4%
7.5%
0.00%
6.7%
12/05/2014
11:49:47
3.4b % SteamUse
low temp
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
49,900
99,600
17.6%
32.8%
12.1%
21.9%
12.8%
27.0%
13.9%
28.0%
10,000
30,100
50,100
149,200
8.2%
25.9%
39.7%
79.0%
3.8%
12.0%
19.5%
47.7%
2.6%
7.9%
13.3%
43.1%
6.7%
24.2%
36.8%
58.7%
3.4b.139
12/05/2014
11:49:47
3.4b % SteamUse
Low Temp
Steam Use
90.0%
80.0%
70.0%
60.0%
Column E
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
-
20,000
40,000
60,000
Gas Conce
High Tem
Steam Use
3 5 .0 %
3 0 .0 %
Column E
%s te a mto ga s re mo v a lpo we r
(a s pu re s te a m)
2 5 .0 %
2 0 .0 %
1 5 .0 %
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
1 0 .0 %
3.4b.140
12/05/2014
11:49:47
3.4b % SteamUse
High Tem
Steam Use
3 5 .0 %
3 0 .0 %
Column E
%s te a mto ga s re mo v a lpo we r
(a s pu re s te a m)
2 5 .0 %
2 0 .0 %
1 5 .0 %
1 0 .0 %
5 .0 %
0 .0 %
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
2 0 ,0 0 0
3.4b.141
4 0 ,0 0 0
12/05/2014
11:49:47
3.4b % SteamUse
steam to vacuum
reboiler feed
steam
gas
lb/hr
lb/hr
xx
xx
xx
xx
858,000
total =
110,000
968,000
xx
xx
119,000
134,000
13.9%
xx
xx
126,000
142,000
14.7%
gas
lb/hr
% of feed steam
(pure steam)
151,000
17.6%
171,000 = raw gas + steam
104,000
117,000
lb/hr
% of feed
steam
lb/hr
(pure steam)
12.1%
2,000
0.2%
2,000 = raw gas + steam
108,000
98.1%
108,000
216,000 = raw steam + gas
steam to vacuum
reboiler feed
steam
gas
lb/hr
lb/hr
xx
xx
92,000
10.6%
99,000 = raw gas + steam
xx
xx
64,000
69,000
867,000
total =
65,000
932,000
xx
xx
58,000
63,000
6.7%
xx
xx
75,000
81,000
8.7%
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
gas
lb/hr
% of feed steam
lb/hr
lb/hr
7.4%
1,000
0.1%
1,000 = raw gas + steam
64,000
98.0%
64,000
128,000 = raw steam + gas
steam to vacuum
lb/hr
% of feed
steam
% of feed steam
3.4b.142
gas
% of feed
steam
lb/hr
12/05/2014
11:49:47
3.4b % SteamUse
xx
xx
28,000
3.2%
29,000 = raw gas + steam
xx
xx
21,000
21,000
874,000
total =
22,000
896,000
xx
xx
xx
xx
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
23,000
23,000
2.4%
0.0%
= raw gas + steam
21,000
97.3%
21,000
42,000 = raw steam + gas
0.0%
2.6%
3.4b.143
12/05/2014
11:49:47
3.4b % SteamUse
steam to vacuum
reboiler feed
steam
gas
lb/hr
lb/hr
xx
xx
xx
xx
1,411,000
total =
35,000
1,446,000
lb/hr
% of feed steam
54,000
55,000
2,000
0.1%
2,000 = raw gas + steam
94,000
97,000
6.7%
xx
xx
xx
xx
70,000
72,000
5.0%
lb/hr
% of feed steam
xx
xx
362,000
25.9%
390,000 = raw gas + steam
xx
xx
168,000
180,000
106,000
1,505,000
6,000
0.4%
6,000 = raw gas + steam
xx
338,000
363,000
24.2%
xx
xx
233,000
250,000
16.7%
lb/hr
lb/hr
gas
% of feed
steam
lb/hr
104,000
98.0%
104,000
208,000 = raw steam + gas
steam to vacuum
reboiler feed
steam
gas
lb/hr
lb/hr
% of feed steam
xx
xx
550,000
39.7%
621,000 = raw gas + steam
xx
xx
270,000
305,000
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
12.0%
xx
steam
lb/hr
34,000
97.6%
34,000
68,000 = raw steam + gas
steam to vacuum
reboiler feed
steam
gas
lb/hr
lb/hr
gas
% of feed
3.8%
xx
1,399,000
total =
lb/hr
115,000
8.2%
118,000 = raw gas + steam
xx
gas
% of feed
steam
lb/hr
19.5%
3.4b.144
12/05/2014
11:49:47
3.4b % SteamUse
1,385,000
total =
178,000
1,563,000
9,000
0.7%
10,000 = raw gas + steam
xx
xx
510,000
576,000
36.8%
xx
xx
389,000
439,000
28.1%
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
3.4b.145
175,000
98.0%
175,000
350,000 = raw steam + gas
12/05/2014
11:49:47
3.4b % SteamUse
steam to vacuum
reboiler feed
steam
gas
lb/hr
lb/hr
xx
xx
xx
xx
1,311,000
total =
lb/hr
% of feed steam
626,000
894,000
562,000
1,873,000
14,000
1.1%
20,000 = raw gas + steam
770,000
1,100,000
58.7%
xx
xx
960,000
1,372,000
73.2%
steam
lb/hr
551,000
98.0%
551,000
### = raw steam + gas
steam to vacuum
reboiler feed
steam
gas
lb/hr
lb/hr
lb/hr
% of feed steam
xx
xx
274,000
32.8%
349,000 = raw gas + steam
xx
xx
183,000
21.9%
233,000 = raw gas + steam
226,000
1,062,000
4,000
0.5%
5,000 = raw gas + steam
xx
xx
234,000
28.0%
297,000 = raw gas + steam
xx
xx
243,000
29.1%
309,000 = raw gas + steam
moval Power
luding reboiler vent gas)
gas
% of feed
47.7%
xx
HYBRID
lb/hr
1,036,000
79.0%
1,480,000 = raw gas + steam
xx
836,000
total =
gas
% of feed
steam
lb/hr
222,000
98.2%
222,000
444,000 = raw steam + gas
This worksheet plots the percent of pure steam in the plant feed needed to achieve
noncondensable gas removal from the power plant, when the power turbine is being fed
sufficient flashed steam to produce 50 MW of power. The values and plots below do account
for the reboiler losses of steam in the vent gas.
See also the adjacent "AuxGraphs" plots of the mass flowrates of consumption of bulk flashed
steam. That worksheet accounts only for vacuum system gas demand for the reboiler cases.
2.6%
8.7%
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
3.4b.146
12/05/2014
11:49:47
3.4b % SteamUse
This worksheet plots the percent of pure steam in the plant feed needed to achieve
noncondensable gas removal from the power plant, when the power turbine is being fed
sufficient flashed steam to produce 50 MW of power. The values and plots below do account
for the reboiler losses of steam in the vent gas.
See also the adjacent "AuxGraphs" plots of the mass flowrates of consumption of bulk flashed
steam. That worksheet accounts only for vacuum system gas demand for the reboiler cases.
14.7%
29.1%
5.0%
16.7%
28.1%
73.2%
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
3.4b.147
12/05/2014
11:49:47
3.4b % SteamUse
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
ppmv
t. ejector
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
3.4b.148
12/05/2014
11:49:47
3.4b % SteamUse
High Temperature Cases:
Steam Used for Gas Removal
t. ejector
4 0 ,0 0 0
6 0 ,0 0 0
8 0 ,0 0 0
1 0 0 ,0 0 0
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
3.4b.149
12/05/2014
11:49:47
3.4b % SteamUse
flow to reboiler vent
steam
% of feed
(pure steam)
normalized
to flash
plant feed
12.6%
12.6%
normalized
to flash
plant feed
7.4%
7.4%
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
3.4b.150
12/05/2014
11:49:47
3.4b % SteamUse
normalized
to flash
plant feed
2.4%
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
2.4%
3.4b.151
12/05/2014
11:49:47
3.4b % SteamUse
flow to reboiler vent
steam
% of feed
normalized
to flash
plant feed
2.4%
2.4%
normalized
to flash
plant feed
7.4%
7.4%
normalized
to flash
plant feed
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
3.4b.152
12/05/2014
11:49:47
3.4b % SteamUse
12.6%
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
12.6%
3.4b.153
12/05/2014
11:49:47
3.4b % SteamUse
flow to reboiler vent
steam
% of feed
normalized
to flash
plant feed
42.0%
42.0%
normalized
to flash
plant feed
26.6%
26.6%
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
3.4b.154
12/05/2014
11:49:47
3.4b % SteamUse
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
3.4b.155
12/05/2014
11:49:47
3.4b % SteamUse
120,000
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
140,000
160,000
3.4b.156
12/05/2014
11:49:47
3.4b % SteamUse
8 0 ,0 0 0
1 0 0 ,0 0 0
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
1 2 0 ,0 0 0
3.4b.157
12/05/2014
11:49:47
FACILITY
SECTIONS
SUBSYSTEMS
COST ISSUES
Production
Systems
geothermal source reservoir
production wells
gathering system
all of above
prolonged productivity
reduced replacement
growth, durability
productivity/pressure loss
power turbine
materials durability
productivity/efficiency
materials durability
productivity/efficiency
fan power demand
c.w. pump power demand
materials durability
productivity/efficiency
capital and O&M costs
net revenues
Power Plant
condensers
cooling towers
vacuum system
net plant electrical sales
Emissions Control (this is only a factor when required for plant permitting)
gas abatement process
size
efficiency
product removal/disposal
operating supplies
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.5.158
11:49:47
12/05/2014
materials durability
potential elimination of abatement process
Legend :
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.5.159
11:49:47
12/05/2014
Steam Jet
Ejector
baseline
baseline
baseline
baseline
housing, rotors/blading
power output
shell and tubes
reduced vapor load, higher heat transfer
less cooling water flow
less cooling water flow
piping, vacuum drivers
reduced steam use
higher first cost, repairs, replacement
increased output and/or reduced costs
baseline
baseline
baseline
baseline
baseline
baseline
baseline
baseline
baseline
baseline
baseline
TurboCompressor
Biphase
Eductor
baseline
baseline
baseline
Page 3.5.160
11:49:47
12/05/2014
baseline
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.5.161
11:49:47
12/05/2014
CTURE
____________________
ETHODS
E SYSTEMS
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.5.162
11:49:47
12/05/2014
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 3.5.163
11:49:47
12/05/2014
Case
No.
RETURN
B1.1
BASE CASE 1 -- single flash, condensing turbine, with 2-stage steam jet ejector vacuum
system to remove noncondensable gases from main condenser. Target 50 MW gross
power output from turbine/generator. Applied ca. 50,000 parts per million CO2 gas (mole
basis, ppmv) in turbine feed steam. Production fluid delivered to flash at 550 oF.
ALTERNATE 1.1 -- replace ejector battery with 3-stage turbocompressor train. For
costing, assume redundant ejector train as emergency backup.
Other criteria as per Base Case.
B1.2 ALTERNATE 1.2 -- a vertical-tube, falling film reboiler is installed after the flash separator,
processing raw steam before its entry to the power turbine. Conventional steam jet
ejectors handle the reduced gas load from the main condenser. Adjust the gross plant feed
rate to maintain 50 MW production from the generator. Other criteria as per Base Case.
B1.3 ALTERNATE 1.3 -- using the base case configuration, replace the steam jet ejectors with
eductors for which the motive fluid is flashing, spent brine from the plant inlet flash tank.
Other criteria as per Base Case.
B1.4 ALTERNATE 1.4 -- modify the base case ejector train to a configuration with two stages of
steam jet ejectors and a 3rd-stage turbocompressor. The ejectors will be at higher
efficiency than in a net 2-stage system. A backup 3rd stage ejector is assumed. Other
criteria as per Base Case.
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.1.164
11:49:47
12/05/2014
Case
No.
RETURN
BASE CASE 2 -- same as Base Case 1 but designating ca. 20,000 ppmv CO2 in
turbine feed steam.
B2.1 ALTERNATE 2.1 -- replace ejector battery with 3-stage turbocompressor train.
B2.2 ALTERNATE 2.2 -- a vertical-tube, falling film reboiler is installed after the flash separator.
B2.3 ALTERNATE 2.3 -- replace the steam jet ejectors with biphase eductors.
B2.4 ALTERNATE 2.4 -- use two stages of steam jet ejectors and a 3rd-stage turbocompressor.
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.1.165
11:49:47
12/05/2014
Case
No.
RETURN
BASE CASE 2 -- same as Base Case 1 but designating ca. 10,000 ppmv CO2 in
turbine feed steam.
B3.1 ALTERNATE 3.1 -- replace ejector battery with 3-stage turbocompressor train.
B3.2 ALTERNATE 3.2 -- a vertical-tube, falling film reboiler is installed after the flash separator.
B3.3 ALTERNATE 3.3 -- replace the steam jet ejectors with biphase eductors.
B3.4 ALTERNATE 3.4 -- use two stages of steam jet ejectors and a 3rd-stage turbocompressor.
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.1.166
11:49:47
12/05/2014
Case
No.
RETURN
BASE CASE 4 -- same as Base Case 1 but with production fluid delivered to flash at 350
o
F.
B4.1 ALTERNATE 4.1 -- replace ejector battery with 3-stage turbocompressor train.
B4.2 ALTERNATE 4.2 -- a vertical-tube, falling film reboiler is installed after the flash separator.
B4.3 ALTERNATE 4.3 -- replace the steam jet ejectors with biphase eductors.
B4.4 ALTERNATE 4.4 -- use two stages of steam jet ejectors and a 3rd-stage turbocompressor.
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.1.167
11:49:47
12/05/2014
Case
No.
RETURN
BASE CASE 5 -- same as Base Case 2 but with production fluid delivered to flash at
350 oF.
B5.1 ALTERNATE 5.1 -- replace ejector battery with 3-stage turbocompressor train.
B5.2 ALTERNATE 5.2 -- a vertical-tube, falling film reboiler is installed after the flash separator.
B5.3 ALTERNATE 5.3 -- replace the steam jet ejectors with biphase eductors.
B5.4 ALTERNATE 5.4 -- use two stages of steam jet ejectors and a 3rd-stage turbocompressor.
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.1.168
11:49:47
12/05/2014
Case
No.
RETURN
PLACE HOLDER
BASE CASE 6 -- same as Base Case 3 but with production fluid delivered to flash at 350
o
F.
B6.1 ALTERNATE 6.1 -- replace ejector battery with 3-stage turbocompressor train.
B6.2 ALTERNATE 6.2 -- a vertical-tube, falling film reboiler is installed after the flash separator.
B6.3 ALTERNATE 6.3 -- replace the steam jet ejectors with biphase eductors.
B6.4 ALTERNATE 6.4 -- use two stages of steam jet ejectors and a 3rd-stage turbocompressor.
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.1.169
11:49:47
12/05/2014
Case
No.
RETURN
PLACE HOLDER
BASE CASE 7 -- same as Base Case 2 but with production fluid delivered to flash at 350
o
F.
B7.1 ALTERNATE 7.1 -- replace ejector battery with 3-stage turbocompressor train.
B7.2 ALTERNATE 7.2 -- a vertical-tube, falling film reboiler is installed after the flash separator.
B7.3 ALTERNATE 7.3 -- replace the steam jet ejectors with biphase eductors.
B7.4 ALTERNATE 7.4 -- use two stages of steam jet ejectors and a 3rd-stage turbocompressor.
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.1.170
11:49:47
12/05/2014
Case
No.
RETURN
PLACE HOLDER
BASE CASE 6 -- same as Base Case 3 but with production fluid delivered to flash at 350
o
F.
B8.1 ALTERNATE 8.1 -- replace ejector battery with 3-stage turbocompressor train.
B8.2 ALTERNATE 8.2 -- a vertical-tube, falling film reboiler is installed after the flash separator.
B8.3 ALTERNATE 8.3 -- replace the steam jet ejectors with biphase eductors.
B8.4 ALTERNATE 8.4 -- use two stages of steam jet ejectors and a 3rd-stage turbocompressor.
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.1.171
11:49:47
12/05/2014
Case
No.
RETURN
PLACE HOLDER
BASE CASE S1 -- same as Base Case 1 but with a 3-stage steam jet ejector system in
place of the two stage system. Expect alternative technologies' prior advantages to be
lessened.
S1.1 ALTERNATE S1.1 -- replace ejector battery with 3-stage turbocompressor train.
S1.2 ALTERNATE S1.2 -- a vertical-tube, falling film reboiler is installed after the flash separator.
S1.3 ALTERNATE S1.3 -- replace the steam jet ejectors with biphase eductors.
S1.4 ALTERNATE S1.4 -- use two stages of steam jet ejectors and a 3rd-stage turbocompressor.
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.1.172
11:49:47
12/05/2014
Case
No.
RETURN
BASE CASE S2 -- same as Base Case 1 but with steam jet ejector efficiencies reduced
from 23 % to 15 %. Expect alternative technologies" advantages to increase.
S2.1 ALTERNATE S2.1 -- replace ejector battery with 3-stage turbocompressor train.
S2.2 ALTERNATE S2.2 -- a vertical-tube, falling film reboiler is installed after the flash separator.
S2.3 ALTERNATE S2.3 -- replace the steam jet ejectors with biphase eductors.
S2.4 ALTERNATE S2.4 -- use two stages of steam jet ejectors and a 3rd-stage turbocompressor.
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.1.173
11:49:47
12/05/2014
Case
No.
RETURN
BASE CASE S3 -- same as Base Case1 but with a wet bulb temperature of 70 oF.
Expect all parasitic steam loads to increase.
S3.1 ALTERNATE S3.1 -- replace ejector battery with 3-stage turbocompressor train.
S3.2 ALTERNATE S3.2 -- a vertical-tube, falling film reboiler is installed after the flash separator.
S3.3 ALTERNATE S3.3 -- replace the steam jet ejectors with biphase eductors.
S3.4 ALTERNATE S3.4 -- use two stages of steam jet ejectors and a 3rd-stage turbocompressor.
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.1.174
11:49:47
12/05/2014
Case
No.
RETURN
BASE CASE S4 -- same as Base Case 1 and Base Case S3, but with a wet bulb
temperature of 80 oF. Expect all parasitic steam loads to increase.
S4.1 ALTERNATE S4.1 -- replace ejector battery with 3-stage turbocompressor train.
S4.2 ALTERNATE S4.2 -- a vertical-tube, falling film reboiler is installed after the flash separator.
S4.3 ALTERNATE S4.3 -- replace the steam jet ejectors with biphase eductors.
S4.4 ALTERNATE S4.4 -- use two stages of steam jet ejectors and a 3rd-stage turbocompressor.
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.1.175
11:49:47
12/05/2014
Case
No.
RETURN
SENSITIVITY GROUP S-5 -5 CASES : LOW TEMPERATURE, LOW PRESSURE, LOW GAS
S-5
BASE CASE S5 -- same as Base Case 4 but with 3-stage steam jet ejector system in
place of 2-stage system.
S5.1 ALTERNATE S5.1 -- replace ejector battery with 3-stage turbocompressor train.
S5.2 ALTERNATE S5.2 -- a vertical-tube, falling film reboiler is installed after the flash separator.
S5.3 ALTERNATE S5.3 -- replace the steam jet ejectors with biphase eductors.
S5.4 ALTERNATE S5.4 -- use two stages of steam jet ejectors and a 3rd-stage turbocompressor.
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.1.176
11:49:48
12/05/2014
Case
No.
RETURN
SENSITIVITY GROUP S-6 -5 CASES : LOW TEMPERATURE, LOW PRESSURE, LOW GAS
S-6
BASE CASE S6 -- same as Base Case 4 but with steam jet ejector efficiencies reduced
from 23 % to 15 %. Expect alternative technologies' advantages to increase.
S6.1 ALTERNATE S6.1 -- replace ejector battery with 3-stage turbocompressor train.
S6.2 ALTERNATE S6.2 -- a vertical-tube, falling film reboiler is installed after the flash separator.
S6.3 ALTERNATE S6.3 -- replace the steam jet ejectors with biphase eductors.
S6.4 ALTERNATE S6.4 -- use two stages of steam jet ejectors and a 3rd-stage turbocompressor.
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.1.177
11:49:48
12/05/2014
Case
No.
RETURN
SENSITIVITY GROUP S-7 -5 CASES : LOW TEMPERATURE, LOW PRESSURE, LOW GAS
S-7
BASE CASE S7 -- same as Base Case 4 but with wet bulb temperature of 80 oF. Expect
all parasitic steam loads to increase.
S7.1 ALTERNATE S7.1 -- replace ejector battery with 3-stage turbocompressor train.
S7.2 ALTERNATE S7.2 -- a vertical-tube, falling film reboiler is installed after the flash separator.
S7.3 ALTERNATE S7.3 -- replace the steam jet ejectors with biphase eductors.
S7.4 ALTERNATE S7.4 -- use two stages of steam jet ejectors and a 3rd-stage turbocompressor.
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.1.178
11:49:48
12/05/2014
Case
No.
RETURN
SENSITIVITY GROUP S-8 -5 CASES : HIGH TEMPERATURE, HIGH PRESSURE, HIGH GAS
S-8
S8.1 ALTERNATE S8.1 -- replace ejector battery with 3-stage turbocompressor train.
S8.2 ALTERNATE S8.2 -- a vertical-tube, falling film reboiler is installed after the flash separator.
S8.3 ALTERNATE S8.3 -- replace the steam jet ejectors with biphase eductors.
S8.4 ALTERNATE S8.4 -- use two stages of steam jet ejectors and a 3rd-stage turbocompressor.
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.1.179
11:49:48
12/05/2014
Case
No.
RETURN
SENSITIVITY GROUP S-9 -5 CASES : HIGH TEMPERATURE, HIGH PRESSURE, HIGH GAS
S-9
S9.1 ALTERNATE S9.1 -- replace ejector battery with 3-stage turbocompressor train.
S9.2 ALTERNATE S9.2 -- a vertical-tube, falling film reboiler is installed after the flash separator.
S9.3 ALTERNATE S9.3 -- replace the steam jet ejectors with biphase eductors.
S9.4 ALTERNATE S9.4 -- use two stages of steam jet ejectors and a 3rd-stage turbocompressor.
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.1.180
11:49:48
12/05/2014
Case
No.
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
RETURN
Page 4.1.181
11:49:48
12/05/2014
T = oF
B-1
B1.1
B1.2
B1.3
B1.4
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
2,291,000
2,291,000
2,289,000
2,291,000
2,291,000
Combined Brine
& Steam Gas
Conc'n.
T=
550
P=
1,177
T=
550
P=
1176.8
T=
550
P=
1177
T=
550
P=
1177
T=
550
P=
1177
Page 4.1.182
48,800
48,800
48,800
48,800
48,800
11:49:48
12/05/2014
T = oF
B-2
B2.1
B2.2
B2.3
B2.4
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
2,288,000
2,288,000
2,287,000
2,288,000
2,288,000
Combined Brine
& Steam Gas
Conc'n.
T=
550
P=
1,124
T=
550
P=
1124
T=
550
P=
1124
T=
550
P=
1124
T=
550
P=
1124
Page 4.1.183
29,000
29,000
29,000
29,000
29,000
11:49:48
12/05/2014
T = oF
B-3
B3.1
B3.2
B3.3
B3.4
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
2,284,000
2,284,000
2,284,000
2,284,000
2,284,000
Combined Brine
& Steam Gas
Conc'n.
T=
550
P=
1,072
T=
550
P=
1072
T=
550
P=
1072
T=
550
P=
1072
T=
550
P=
1072
Page 4.1.184
9,600
9,600
9,600
9,600
9,600
11:49:48
12/05/2014
T = oF
B-4
B4.1
B4.2
B4.3
B4.4
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
5,418,000
5,418,000
5,418,000
5,418,000
5,418,000
Combined Brine
& Steam Gas
Conc'n.
T=
350
P=
137
T=
350
P=
137
T=
350
P=
137
T=
350
P=
137
T=
350
P=
137
Page 4.1.185
6,500
6,500
6,500
6,500
6,500
11:49:48
12/05/2014
T = oF
B-5
B5.1
B5.2
B5.3
B5.4
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
5,395,000
5,395,000
5,391,000
5,395,000
5,395,000
Combined Brine
& Steam Gas
Conc'n.
T=
350
P=
142
T=
350
P=
142
T=
350
P=
142
T=
350
P=
142
T=
350
P=
142
Page 4.1.186
19,700
19,700
19,700
19,700
19,700
11:49:48
12/05/2014
T = oF
B-6
B6.1
B6.2
B6.3
B6.4
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
5,365,000
5,365,000
5,354,000
5,365,000
5,365,000
Combined Brine
& Steam Gas
Conc'n.
T=
350
P=
146
T=
350
P=
146
T=
350
P=
146
T=
350
P=
146
T=
350
P=
146
Page 4.1.187
33,400
33,400
33,400
33,400
33,400
11:49:48
12/05/2014
T = oF
B-7
B7.1
B7.2
B7.3
B7.4
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
5,201,000
5,201,000
5,119,000
5,201,000
5,201,000
Combined Brine
& Steam Gas
Conc'n.
T=
350
P=
170
T=
350
P=
170
T=
350
P=
170
T=
350
P=
170
T=
350
P=
170
Page 4.1.188
108,500
108,500
108,500
108,500
108,500
11:49:48
12/05/2014
T = oF
B-8
B8.1
B8.2
B8.3
B8.4
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
2,297,000
2,297,000
2,289,000
2,297,000
2,297,000
Combined Brine
& Steam Gas
Conc'n.
T=
550
P=
1,316
T=
550
P=
1316
T=
550
P=
1316
T=
550
P=
1316
T=
550
P=
1316
Page 4.1.189
99,700
99,700
99,700
99,700
99,700
11:49:48
12/05/2014
T = oF
S-1
S1.1
S1.2
S1.3
S1.4
2,291,000
2,291,000
2,289,000
2,291,000
2,291,000
T=
550
P=
1,177
T=
550
P=
1177
T=
550
P=
1177
T=
550
P=
1177
T=
550
P=
1177
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Combined Brine
& Steam Gas
Conc'n.
Page 4.1.190
48,800
48,800
48,800
48,800
48,800
PLACE HOLDER
11:49:48
12/05/2014
T = oF
S-2
S2.1
S2.2
S2.3
S2.4
5,418,000
5,418,000
5,418,000
5,418,000
5,418,000
T=
350
P=
137
T=
350
P=
137
T=
350
P=
137
T=
350
P=
137
T=
350
P=
137
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Combined Brine
& Steam Gas
Conc'n.
Page 4.1.191
6,500
6,500
6,500
6,500
6,500
PLACE HOLDER
11:49:48
12/05/2014
T = oF
S-3
S3.1
S3.2
S3.3
S3.4
2,505,000
2,505,000
2,505,000
2,505,000
2,505,000
T=
550
P=
1,124
T=
550
P=
1124
T=
550
P=
1124
T=
550
P=
1124
T=
550
P=
1124
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Combined Brine
& Steam Gas
Conc'n.
Page 4.1.192
28,900
28,900
28,900
28,900
28,900
PLACE HOLDER
11:49:48
12/05/2014
T = oF
S-4
S4.1
S4.2
S4.3
S4.4
6,251,000
6,251,000
6,250,000
6,251,000
6,251,000
T=
350
P=
137
T=
350
P=
137
T=
350
P=
137
T=
350
P=
137
T=
350
P=
137
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Combined Brine
& Steam Gas
Conc'n.
Page 4.1.193
6,400
6,400
6,400
6,400
6,400
PLACE HOLDER
11:49:48
12/05/2014
T = oF
Combined Brine
& Steam Gas
Conc'n.
S-5
S5.1
S5.3
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.1.194
PLACE HOLDER
11:49:48
12/05/2014
T = oF
Combined Brine
& Steam Gas
Conc'n.
S-6
S6.1
S6.3
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.1.195
PLACE HOLDER
11:49:48
12/05/2014
T = oF
Combined Brine
& Steam Gas
Conc'n.
S-7
S7.1
S7.3
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.1.196
PLACE HOLDER
11:49:48
12/05/2014
T = oF
Combined Brine
& Steam Gas
Conc'n.
S-8
S8.1
S8.3
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.1.197
PLACE HOLDER
11:49:48
12/05/2014
T = oF
Combined Brine
& Steam Gas
Conc'n.
S-9
S9.1
S9.3
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.1.198
11:49:48
12/05/2014
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
T = oF
Combined Brine
& Steam Gas
Conc'n.
Page 4.1.199
11:49:48
12/05/2014
Flash
Conditions CO2 ppm
by volume
(ppmv) in
vapor
o
F, PSIA
phase
TOTAL
FLOW
TURBINE
BACKPRESSURE
Steam +
Gases
lbs / hour
inches Hg
abs.
STEAM
UNIT
TO
CAPACIT
VACUUM
Y
DRIVERS
STEAM TO
OTHER
SYSTEMS
Gross
Total Flow
Generator
(with gas)
Output
Total Flow
Megawatt
s
lbs / hour
lbs / hour
B1.1
B1.2
B1.3
B1.4
334
114
334
114
334
114
334
114
334
114
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
49,900
968,000
3.424
50.0
170,500
49,900
968,000
3.424
50.0
116,800
15,000
closure
49,900
968,000
750,000
49,900
968,000
3.265
50.0
2,100
3.424
50.0
215,433
reboiler vent
134,400
17,257
closure
49,900
968,000
3.424
Page 4.1.200
50.0
142,000
11:49:48
12/05/2014
Flash
Conditions CO2 ppm
by volume
(ppmv) in
vapor
o
F, PSIA
phase
TOTAL
FLOW
TURBINE
BACKPRESSURE
Steam +
Gases
lbs / hour
inches Hg
abs.
STEAM
UNIT
TO
CAPACIT
VACUUM
Y
DRIVERS
STEAM TO
OTHER
SYSTEMS
Gross
Total Flow
Generator
(with gas)
Output
Total Flow
Megawatt
s
lbs / hour
lbs / hour
B2.1
B2.2
B2.3
B2.4
334
113
334
113
334
113
334
113
334
113
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
29,900
932,000
3.419
50.0
98,600
29,900
932,000
3.419
50.0
69,100
5,210
closure
29,900
932,000
803,000
29,900
932,000
3.264
50.0
1,200
3.419
50.0
127,917
reboiler vent
62,800
4,739
closure
29,900
932,000
3.419
Page 4.1.201
50.0
81,100
11:49:48
12/05/2014
Flash
Conditions CO2 ppm
by volume
(ppmv) in
vapor
o
F, PSIA
phase
TOTAL
FLOW
TURBINE
BACKPRESSURE
Steam +
Gases
lbs / hour
inches Hg
abs.
STEAM
UNIT
TO
CAPACIT
VACUUM
Y
DRIVERS
STEAM TO
OTHER
SYSTEMS
Gross
Total Flow
Generator
(with gas)
Output
Total Flow
Megawatt
s
lbs / hour
lbs / hour
B3.1
B3.2
B3.3
B3.4
335
111
335
111
335
111
335
111
335
111
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
10,000
896,000
3.398
50.0
28,700
10,000
896,000
3.398
50.0
21,300
524
closure
10,000
896,000
853,000
10,000
896,000
3.265
50.0
400
3.398
50.0
42,201
reboiler vent
0
closure
10,000
896,000
3.398
Page 4.1.202
50.0
23,100
11:49:48
12/05/2014
Flash
Conditions CO2 ppm
by volume
(ppmv) in
vapor
o
F, PSIA
phase
TOTAL
FLOW
TURBINE
BACKPRESSURE
Steam +
Gases
lbs / hour
inches Hg
abs.
STEAM
UNIT
TO
CAPACIT
VACUUM
Y
DRIVERS
STEAM TO
OTHER
SYSTEMS
Gross
Total Flow
Generator
(with gas)
Output
Total Flow
Megawatt
s
lbs / hour
lbs / hour
B4.1
B4.2
B4.3
B4.4
235
23
235
23
235
23
235
23
235
23
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
10,000
1,446,000
3.397
50.0
117,900
10,000
1,446,000
3.397
50.0
55,400
1,373
closure
10,000
1,446,000
1,375,000
10,000
1,446,000
3.265
50.0
2,100
3.397
50.0
68,400
reboiler vent
96,600
2,393
closure
10,000
1,446,000
3.397
Page 4.1.203
50.0
71,600
11:49:49
12/05/2014
Flash
Conditions CO2 ppm
by volume
(ppmv) in
vapor
o
F, PSIA
phase
TOTAL
FLOW
TURBINE
BACKPRESSURE
Steam +
Gases
lbs / hour
inches Hg
abs.
STEAM
UNIT
TO
CAPACIT
VACUUM
Y
DRIVERS
STEAM TO
OTHER
SYSTEMS
Gross
Total Flow
Generator
(with gas)
Output
Total Flow
Megawatt
s
lbs / hour
lbs / hour
B5.1
B5.2
B5.3
B5.4
234
23
234
23
234
23
234
23
234
23
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
30,100
1,505,000
3.419
50.0
389,800
30,100
1,505,000
3.419
50.0
180,400
13,672
closure
30,100
1,505,000
1,291,000
30,100
1,505,000
3.265
50.0
6,300
3.419
50.0
206,704
reboiler vent
363,380
27,534
closure
30,100
1,505,000
3.419
Page 4.1.204
50.0
250,400
11:49:49
12/05/2014
Flash
Conditions CO2 ppm
by volume
(ppmv) in
vapor
o
F, PSIA
phase
TOTAL
FLOW
TURBINE
BACKPRESSURE
Steam +
Gases
lbs / hour
inches Hg
abs.
STEAM
UNIT
TO
CAPACIT
VACUUM
Y
DRIVERS
STEAM TO
OTHER
SYSTEMS
Gross
Total Flow
Generator
(with gas)
Output
Total Flow
Megawatt
s
lbs / hour
PLACE HOLDER
lbs / hour
PLACE HOLDER
B6.1
B6.2
B6.3
B6.4
234
24
234
24
234
24
234
24
234
24
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
50,100
1,563,000
3.424
50.0
620,500
50,100
1,563,000
3.424
50.0
304,900
39,267
closure
50,100
1,563,000
1,203,000
50,100
1,563,000
3.265
50.0
10,400
3.424
50.0
346,618
reboiler vent
576,300
74,223
closure
50,100
1,563,000
3.424
Page 4.1.205
50.0
439,100
11:49:49
12/05/2014
Flash
Conditions CO2 ppm
by volume
(ppmv) in
vapor
o
F, PSIA
phase
TOTAL
FLOW
TURBINE
BACKPRESSURE
Steam +
Gases
lbs / hour
inches Hg
abs.
STEAM
UNIT
TO
CAPACIT
VACUUM
Y
DRIVERS
STEAM TO
OTHER
SYSTEMS
Gross
Total Flow
Generator
(with gas)
Output
Total Flow
Megawatt
s
lbs / hour
PLACE HOLDER
lbs / hour
PLACE HOLDER
B7.1
B7.2
B7.3
B7.4
232
25
232
25
232
25
232
25
232
25
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
149,200
1,873,000
3.429
49.9
1,480,000
-8,310
149,200
1,873,000
3.429
49.9
893,900
383,113
closure
149,200
1,873,000
751,000
149,200
1,873,000
3.354
49.9
20,200
3.429
49.9
1,099,700
1,072,009
reboiler vent
471,015
closure
149,200
1,873,000
3.429
Page 4.1.206
49.9
1,372,200
-2,730
11:49:49
12/05/2014
Flash
Conditions CO2 ppm
by volume
(ppmv) in
vapor
o
F, PSIA
phase
TOTAL
FLOW
TURBINE
BACKPRESSURE
Steam +
Gases
lbs / hour
inches Hg
abs.
STEAM
UNIT
TO
CAPACIT
VACUUM
Y
DRIVERS
STEAM TO
OTHER
SYSTEMS
Gross
Total Flow
Generator
(with gas)
Output
Total Flow
Megawatt
s
lbs / hour
PLACE HOLDER
lbs / hour
PLACE HOLDER
B8.1
B8.2
B8.3
B8.4
333
119
333
119
333
119
333
119
333
119
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
99,600
1,062,000
3.428
50.0
348,700
99,600
1,062,000
3.428
50.0
232,700
62,890
closure
99,600
1,062,000
614,000
99,600
1,062,000
3.315
50.0
5,400
3.428
50.0
439,112
reboiler vent
297,100
80,294
closure
99,600
1,062,000
3.428
Page 4.1.207
50.0
308,600
11:49:49
12/05/2014
Flash
Conditions CO2 ppm
by volume
(ppmv) in
vapor
o
F, PSIA
phase
TURBINE
BACKPRESSURE
TOTAL
FLOW
Steam +
Gases
inches Hg
abs.
lbs / hour
STEAM
UNIT
TO
CAPACIT
VACUUM
Y
DRIVERS
STEAM TO
OTHER
SYSTEMS
Gross
Total Flow
Generator
(with gas)
Output
Total Flow
Megawatt
s
lbs / hour
PLACE HOLDER
lbs / hour
PLACE HOLDER
334
114
S1.1
S1.2
S1.3
S1.4
334
114
334
114
334
114
334
114
49,900 968,000.00
3.42
50.0
246,503
-464
49,900 968,000.00
3.42
50.0
116,794
14,536
49,900
3.27
50.0
2,103
215,433
968,000
750,000
49,900 968,000.00
3.42
50.0
196,560
24,781
49,900 968,000.00
3.42
50.0
194,353
-464
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
reboiler vent
Page 4.1.208
PLACE HOLDER
11:49:49
12/05/2014
Flash
Conditions CO2 ppm
by volume
(ppmv) in
vapor
o
F, PSIA
phase
TOTAL
FLOW
TURBINE
BACKPRESSURE
Steam +
Gases
lbs / hour
inches Hg
abs.
STEAM
UNIT
TO
CAPACIT
VACUUM
Y
DRIVERS
STEAM TO
OTHER
SYSTEMS
Gross
Total Flow
Generator
(with gas)
Output
Total Flow
Megawatt
s
lbs / hour
lbs / hour
235
23
S2.1
S2.2
S2.3
S2.4
235
23
235
23
235
23
235
23
10,100 1,446,000
3.40
50.0
171,739
353
10,100
1,446,000
3.40
50.0
55,520
1,731
10,100
1,446,000
3.26
50.0
2,123
68,517
1,375,000
10,100
1,446,000
3.40
50.0
142,418
3,887
10,100
1,446,000
3.40
50.0
101,817
353
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
reboiler vent
Page 4.1.209
PLACE HOLDER
11:49:49
12/05/2014
Flash
Conditions CO2 ppm
by volume
(ppmv) in
vapor
o
F, PSIA
phase
TOTAL
FLOW
TURBINE
BACKPRESSURE
Steam +
Gases
lbs / hour
inches Hg
abs.
STEAM
UNIT
TO
CAPACIT
VACUUM
Y
DRIVERS
STEAM TO
OTHER
SYSTEMS
Gross
Total Flow
Generator
(with gas)
Output
Total Flow
Megawatt
s
lbs / hour
lbs / hour
344
128
S3.1
S3.2
S3.3
S3.4
344
128
344
128
344
128
344
128
30,400 1,001,000
5.71
50.0
90,895
267
30,400
1,001,000
5.71
50.0
68,693
5,538
30,400
1,001,000
5.41
50.0
1,093
139,609
860,000
30,400
1,001,000
5.71
50.0
50,220
4,120
30,400
1,001,000
5.71
50.0
78,655
267
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
reboiler vent
Page 4.1.210
PLACE HOLDER
11:49:49
12/05/2014
Flash
Conditions CO2 ppm
by volume
(ppmv) in
vapor
o
F, PSIA
phase
TOTAL
FLOW
TURBINE
BACKPRESSURE
Steam +
Gases
lbs / hour
inches Hg
abs.
STEAM
UNIT
TO
CAPACIT
VACUUM
Y
DRIVERS
STEAM TO
OTHER
SYSTEMS
Gross
Total Flow
Generator
(with gas)
Output
Total Flow
Megawatt
s
lbs / hour
lbs / hour
244
27
S4.1
S4.2
S4.3
S4.4
244
27
244
27
244
27
244
27
10,100 1,615,000
5.66
50.0
98,650
223
10,100
1,615,000
5.66
50.0
57,444
1,662
10,100
1,615,000
5.41
50.0
1,599
77,294
1,536,000
10,100
1,615,000
5.66
50.0
68,825
1,947
10,100
1,615,000
5.66
50.0
69,820
223
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
reboiler vent
Page 4.1.211
PLACE HOLDER
11:49:49
12/05/2014
Flash
Conditions CO2 ppm
by volume
(ppmv) in
vapor
o
F, PSIA
phase
TOTAL
FLOW
TURBINE
BACKPRESSURE
Steam +
Gases
lbs / hour
inches Hg
abs.
STEAM
UNIT
TO
CAPACIT
VACUUM
Y
DRIVERS
STEAM TO
OTHER
SYSTEMS
Gross
Total Flow
Generator
(with gas)
Output
Total Flow
Megawatt
s
lbs / hour
lbs / hour
S5.1
S5.2
S5.3
S5.4
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.1.212
PLACE HOLDER
11:49:49
12/05/2014
Flash
Conditions CO2 ppm
by volume
(ppmv) in
vapor
o
F, PSIA
phase
TOTAL
FLOW
TURBINE
BACKPRESSURE
Steam +
Gases
lbs / hour
inches Hg
abs.
STEAM
UNIT
TO
CAPACIT
VACUUM
Y
DRIVERS
STEAM TO
OTHER
SYSTEMS
Gross
Total Flow
Generator
(with gas)
Output
Total Flow
Megawatt
s
lbs / hour
lbs / hour
S6.1
S6.2
S6.3
S6.4
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.1.213
PLACE HOLDER
11:49:49
12/05/2014
Flash
Conditions CO2 ppm
by volume
(ppmv) in
vapor
o
F, PSIA
phase
TOTAL
FLOW
TURBINE
BACKPRESSURE
Steam +
Gases
lbs / hour
inches Hg
abs.
STEAM
UNIT
TO
CAPACIT
VACUUM
Y
DRIVERS
STEAM TO
OTHER
SYSTEMS
Gross
Total Flow
Generator
(with gas)
Output
Total Flow
Megawatt
s
lbs / hour
lbs / hour
S7.1
S7.2
S7.3
S7.4
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.1.214
PLACE HOLDER
11:49:49
12/05/2014
Flash
Conditions CO2 ppm
by volume
(ppmv) in
vapor
o
F, PSIA
phase
TOTAL
FLOW
TURBINE
BACKPRESSURE
Steam +
Gases
lbs / hour
inches Hg
abs.
STEAM
UNIT
TO
CAPACIT
VACUUM
Y
DRIVERS
STEAM TO
OTHER
SYSTEMS
Gross
Total Flow
Generator
(with gas)
Output
Total Flow
Megawatt
s
lbs / hour
lbs / hour
S8.1
S8.2
S8.3
S8.4
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.1.215
PLACE HOLDER
11:49:49
12/05/2014
Flash
Conditions CO2 ppm
by volume
(ppmv) in
vapor
o
F, PSIA
phase
TOTAL
FLOW
TURBINE
BACKPRESSURE
Steam +
Gases
lbs / hour
inches Hg
abs.
STEAM
UNIT
TO
CAPACIT
VACUUM
Y
DRIVERS
STEAM TO
OTHER
SYSTEMS
Gross
Total Flow
Generator
(with gas)
Output
Total Flow
Megawatt
s
lbs / hour
lbs / hour
S9.1
S9.2
S9.3
S9.4
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.1.216
11:49:49
12/05/2014
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Flash
Conditions CO2 ppm
by volume
(ppmv) in
vapor
o
F, PSIA
phase
TOTAL
FLOW
TURBINE
BACKPRESSURE
Steam +
Gases
lbs / hour
inches Hg
abs.
Page 4.1.217
STEAM
UNIT
TO
CAPACIT
VACUUM
Y
DRIVERS
STEAM TO
OTHER
SYSTEMS
Gross
Total Flow
Generator
(with gas)
Output
Total Flow
Megawatt
s
lbs / hour
lbs / hour
11:49:49
12/05/2014
Case
No.
AUXILIARY
ELECTRICITY
ELECTRICITY
CW pumps, CT
fans, brine
repressurization
Kilowatts
Megawatts
In all cases, the "Net Sales Electricity" reflects only the reduction
from gross unit capacity caused by deducting the "Auxiliary"
demands. No other utilities are counted in the "Net."
B-1
POWER
LOSS TO
GAS
REMOVAL
3,020
38.2
%
MAIN CASE
GROUP 1
23.7%
base case
s-st. ejector
B1.1
2,730
40.5
19.1%
3-st. turbo
B1.2
2,330
38.6
22.9%
reboiler
B1.3
3,120
39.0
21.9%
biphase
eductor
B1.4
2,760
39.9
20.2%
hybrid 2-st
ejector/3rd
stage turbo
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.1.218
11:49:49
12/05/2014
Case
No.
AUXILIARY
ELECTRICITY
ELECTRICITY
CW pumps, CT
fans, brine
repressurization
Kilowatts
Megawatts
In all cases, the "Net Sales Electricity" reflects only the reduction
from gross unit capacity caused by deducting the "Auxiliary"
demands. No other utilities are counted in the "Net."
B-2
POWER
LOSS TO
GAS
REMOVAL
3,030
41.7
%
MAIN CASE
GROUP 2
16.6%
base case
s-st. ejector
B2.1
2,740
43.3
13.5%
3-st. turbo
B2.2
2,510
41.9
16.2%
reboiler
B2.3
3,390
43.0
14.0%
biphase
eductor
B2.4
2,760
42.9
14.2%
hybrid 2-st
ejector/3rd
stage turbo
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.1.219
11:49:49
12/05/2014
Case
No.
AUXILIARY
ELECTRICITY
ELECTRICITY
CW pumps, CT
fans, brine
repressurization
Kilowatts
Megawatts
In all cases, the "Net Sales Electricity" reflects only the reduction
from gross unit capacity caused by deducting the "Auxiliary"
demands. No other utilities are counted in the "Net."
B-3
POWER
LOSS TO
GAS
REMOVAL
3,020
45.4
%
MAIN CASE
GROUP 3
9.2%
base case
s-st. ejector
B3.1
2,740
46.0
7.9%
3-st. turbo
B3.2
2,690
45.4
9.2%
reboiler
B3.3
3,520
46.5
7.0%
biphase
eductor
B3.4
2,760
45.9
8.1%
hybrid 2-st
ejector/3rd
stage turbo
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.1.220
11:49:49
12/05/2014
Case
No.
AUXILIARY
ELECTRICITY
ELECTRICITY
CW pumps, CT
fans, brine
repressurization
Kilowatts
Megawatts
In all cases, the "Net Sales Electricity" reflects only the reduction
from gross unit capacity caused by deducting the "Auxiliary"
demands. No other utilities are counted in the "Net."
B-4
POWER
LOSS TO
GAS
REMOVAL
5,320
40.6
%
MAIN CASE
GROUP 4
18.8%
base case
s-st. ejector
B4.1
4,790
43.2
13.5%
3-st. turbo
B4.2
4,700
43.3
13.3%
reboiler
B4.3
5,260
41.3
17.4%
biphase
eductor
B4.4
4,830
42.7
14.6%
hybrid 2-st
ejector/3rd
stage turbo
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.1.221
11:49:49
12/05/2014
Case
No.
AUXILIARY
ELECTRICITY
ELECTRICITY
CW pumps, CT
fans, brine
repressurization
Kilowatts
Megawatts
In all cases, the "Net Sales Electricity" reflects only the reduction
from gross unit capacity caused by deducting the "Auxiliary"
demands. No other utilities are counted in the "Net."
B-5
POWER
LOSS TO
GAS
REMOVAL
5,340
31.7
%
MAIN CASE
GROUP 5
36.6%
base case
s-st. ejector
B5.1
4,780
38.8
22.5%
3-st. turbo
B5.2
4,400
39.9
20.3%
reboiler
B5.3
4,210
32.8
34.4%
biphase
eductor
B5.4
4,830
36.8
26.3%
hybrid 2-st
ejector/3rd
stage turbo
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.1.222
11:49:49
12/05/2014
Case
No.
POWER
LOSS TO
GAS
REMOVAL
AUXILIARY
ELECTRICITY
ELECTRICITY
CW pumps, CT
fans, brine
repressurization
Kilowatts
Megawatts
%
PLACE HOLDER
In all cases, the "Net Sales Electricity" reflects only the reduction
from gross unit capacity caused by deducting the "Auxiliary"
demands. No other utilities are counted in the "Net."
B-6
5,350
24.8
MAIN CASE
GROUP 6
50.4%
base case
s-st. ejector
B6.1
4,760
34.2
31.5%
3-st. turbo
B6.2
4,100
36.6
26.8%
reboiler
B6.3
3,330
25.9
48.3%
biphase
eductor
B6.4
4,830
31.1
37.8%
hybrid 2-st
ejector/3rd
stage turbo
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.1.223
11:49:49
12/05/2014
Case
No.
POWER
LOSS TO
GAS
REMOVAL
AUXILIARY
ELECTRICITY
ELECTRICITY
CW pumps, CT
fans, brine
repressurization
Kilowatts
Megawatts
%
PLACE HOLDER
In all cases, the "Net Sales Electricity" reflects only the reduction
from gross unit capacity caused by deducting the "Auxiliary"
demands. No other utilities are counted in the "Net."
B-7
5,190
5.5
MAIN CASE
GROUP 7
89.0%
base case
s-st. ejector
B7.1
4,650
11.2
77.5%
3-st. turbo
B7.2
2,440
23.6
52.7%
reboiler
B7.3
930
7.1
85.7%
biphase
eductor
B7.4
4,690
8.7
82.5%
hybrid 2-st
ejector/3rd
stage turbo
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.1.224
11:49:49
12/05/2014
Case
No.
POWER
LOSS TO
GAS
REMOVAL
AUXILIARY
ELECTRICITY
ELECTRICITY
CW pumps, CT
fans, brine
repressurization
Kilowatts
Megawatts
%
PLACE HOLDER
In all cases, the "Net Sales Electricity" reflects only the reduction
from gross unit capacity caused by deducting the "Auxiliary"
demands. No other utilities are counted in the "Net."
B-8
3,000
30.6
MAIN CASE
GROUP 8
38.8%
base case
s-st. ejector
B8.1
2,700
33.4
33.2%
3-st. turbo
B8.2
1,860
31.0
37.9%
reboiler
B8.3
2,390
29.8
40.3%
biphase
eductor
B8.4
2,730
32.7
34.5%
hybrid 2-st
ejector/3rd
stage turbo
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.1.225
11:49:49
12/05/2014
Case
No.
POWER
LOSS TO
GAS
REMOVAL
AUXILIARY
ELECTRICITY
ELECTRICITY
CW pumps, CT
fans, brine
repressurization
Kilowatts
Megawatts
%
PLACE HOLDER
In all cases, the "Net Sales Electricity" reflects only the reduction
from gross unit capacity caused by deducting the "Auxiliary"
demands. No other utilities are counted in the "Net."
S-1
3,051
SENSITIVITY
GROUP S-1
34.2
31.5%
base case
s-st. ejector
S1.1
2,726
40.5
19.0%
3-st. turbo
S1.2
2,333
38.6
22.9%
reboiler
S1.3
2,814
35.8
28.5%
biphase
eductor
S1.4
2,768
37.2
25.6%
hybrid 2-st
ejector/3rd
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.1.226
stage turbo
11:49:49
12/05/2014
Case
No.
POWER
LOSS TO
GAS
REMOVAL
AUXILIARY
ELECTRICITY
ELECTRICITY
CW pumps, CT
fans, brine
repressurization
Kilowatts
Megawatts
In all cases, the "Net Sales Electricity" reflects only the reduction
from gross unit capacity caused by deducting the "Auxiliary"
demands. No other utilities are counted in the "Net."
S-2
5,332
SENSITIVITY
GROUP S-2
38.7
22.6%
base case
s-st. ejector
S2.1
4,790
43.2
13.5%
3-st. turbo
S2.2
4,698
43.3
13.3%
reboiler
S2.3
5,071
39.9
20.3%
biphase
eductor
S2.4
4,837
41.6
16.7%
hybrid 2-st
ejector/3rd
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.1.227
stage turbo
11:49:49
12/05/2014
Case
No.
POWER
LOSS TO
GAS
REMOVAL
AUXILIARY
ELECTRICITY
ELECTRICITY
CW pumps, CT
fans, brine
repressurization
Kilowatts
Megawatts
In all cases, the "Net Sales Electricity" reflects only the reduction
from gross unit capacity caused by deducting the "Auxiliary"
demands. No other utilities are counted in the "Net."
S-3
3,246
SENSITIVITY
GROUP S-3
42.2
15.6%
base case
s-st. ejector
S3.1
2,922
43.4
13.3%
3-st. turbo
S3.2
2,695
41.7
16.7%
reboiler
S3.3
3,799
43.5
13.0%
biphase
eductor
S3.4
2,967
43.1
13.8%
hybrid 2-st
ejector/3rd
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.1.228
stage turbo
11:49:49
12/05/2014
Case
No.
POWER
LOSS TO
GAS
REMOVAL
AUXILIARY
ELECTRICITY
ELECTRICITY
CW pumps, CT
fans, brine
repressurization
Kilowatts
Megawatts
In all cases, the "Net Sales Electricity" reflects only the reduction
from gross unit capacity caused by deducting the "Auxiliary"
demands. No other utilities are counted in the "Net."
S-4
5,950
SENSITIVITY
GROUP S-4
41.0
18.0%
base case
s-st. ejector
S4.1
5,349
42.8
14.4%
3-st. turbo
S4.2
5,251
42.8
14.4%
reboiler
S4.3
6,259
41.5
16.9%
biphase
eductor
S4.4
5,405
42.4
15.1%
hybrid 2-st
ejector/3rd
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.1.229
stage turbo
11:49:50
12/05/2014
Case
No.
POWER
LOSS TO
GAS
REMOVAL
AUXILIARY
ELECTRICITY
ELECTRICITY
CW pumps, CT
fans, brine
repressurization
Kilowatts
Megawatts
In all cases, the "Net Sales Electricity" reflects only the reduction
from gross unit capacity caused by deducting the "Auxiliary"
demands. No other utilities are counted in the "Net."
S-5
S5.1
S5.2
S5.3
S5.4
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.1.230
11:49:50
12/05/2014
Case
No.
POWER
LOSS TO
GAS
REMOVAL
AUXILIARY
ELECTRICITY
ELECTRICITY
CW pumps, CT
fans, brine
repressurization
Kilowatts
Megawatts
In all cases, the "Net Sales Electricity" reflects only the reduction
from gross unit capacity caused by deducting the "Auxiliary"
demands. No other utilities are counted in the "Net."
S-6
S6.1
S6.2
S6.3
S6.4
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.1.231
11:49:50
12/05/2014
Case
No.
POWER
LOSS TO
GAS
REMOVAL
AUXILIARY
ELECTRICITY
ELECTRICITY
CW pumps, CT
fans, brine
repressurization
Kilowatts
Megawatts
In all cases, the "Net Sales Electricity" reflects only the reduction
from gross unit capacity caused by deducting the "Auxiliary"
demands. No other utilities are counted in the "Net."
S-7
S7.1
S7.2
S7.3
S7.4
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.1.232
11:49:50
12/05/2014
Case
No.
POWER
LOSS TO
GAS
REMOVAL
AUXILIARY
ELECTRICITY
ELECTRICITY
CW pumps, CT
fans, brine
repressurization
Kilowatts
Megawatts
In all cases, the "Net Sales Electricity" reflects only the reduction
from gross unit capacity caused by deducting the "Auxiliary"
demands. No other utilities are counted in the "Net."
S-8
S8.1
S8.2
S8.3
S8.4
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.1.233
11:49:50
12/05/2014
Case
No.
POWER
LOSS TO
GAS
REMOVAL
AUXILIARY
ELECTRICITY
ELECTRICITY
CW pumps, CT
fans, brine
repressurization
Kilowatts
Megawatts
In all cases, the "Net Sales Electricity" reflects only the reduction
from gross unit capacity caused by deducting the "Auxiliary"
demands. No other utilities are counted in the "Net."
S-9
S9.1
S9.2
S9.3
S9.4
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.1.234
11:49:50
12/05/2014
Case
No.
AUXILIARY
ELECTRICITY
ELECTRICITY
CW pumps, CT
fans, brine
repressurization
Kilowatts
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
POWER
LOSS TO
GAS
REMOVAL
Megawatts
Page 4.1.235
11:49:50
12/05/2014
Define a technical "figure of merit" as a ratio of net power plant productivities, comparing the respective productivity
common "Base Case." The common bases include overall process conditions and design assumptions outlined in wo
generating capacity (as megawatts) remaining after deducting power losses consumed specifically by the noncondens
system power demand; for the biphase eductor option, also include the power needed to repressurize flashed brine
megawatts or as percent of gross plant capacity -- i.e. the "residual plant capacity." This assumes any other in-pl
considered separately from gas removal power dem
The value of the figure of merit for the Base Case design is 1.00 by this definition. Figure of merit values greater tha
proportion to the value. Figure-of-merit values less than 1 indicate the Base Case
STEAM TEMPERATURE,
PRESSURE & GAS CONTENT
T = oF
P=
PSIA
550
1177
Flash
Conditions
Gas Loading
in Steam
F, PSIA
ppmv
B1.1
2,291,000
3-stage turbo
T=
P=
550
1177
48,800
T
P
334
114
49,900
B1.2
2,289,000
reboiler
T=
P=
550
1177
48,800
T
P
334
114
49,900
B1.3
2,291,000
biphase
eductor
2,291,000
T=
P=
550
1177
48,800
T
P
334
114
49,900
T=
550
48,800
334
49,900
B1.4
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.2.236
11:49:50
12/05/2014
STEAM TEMPERATURE,
PRESSURE & GAS CONTENT
T = oF
P=
PSIA
hybrid
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
P=
1177
Gas Loading
in Steam
F, PSIA
ppmv
Page 4.2.237
Flash
Conditions
114
11:49:50
12/05/2014
STEAM TEMPERATURE,
PRESSURE & GAS CONTENT
T = oF
P=
PSIA
550
1124
Flash
Conditions
Gas Loading
in Steam
F, PSIA
ppmv
B2.1
2,288,000
3-stage turbo
T=
P=
550
1124
29,000
T
P
334
113
29,900
B2.2
2,287,000
reboiler
T=
P=
550
1124
29,000
T
P
334
113
29,900
B2.3
2,288,000
biphase
eductor
2,288,000
hybrid
T=
P=
550
1124
29,000
T
P
334
113
29,900
T=
P=
550
1124
29,000
T
P
334
113
29,900
550
1072
B2.4
B3.1
2,284,000
3-stage turbo
T=
P=
550
1072
9,600
T
P
335
111
10,000
B3.2
2,284,000
reboiler
T=
P=
550
1072
9,600
T
P
335
111
10,000
B3.3
2,284,000
biphase
eductor
2,284,000
hybrid
T=
P=
550
1072
9,600
T
P
335
111
10,000
T=
P=
550
1072
9,600
T
P
335
111
10,000
B3.4
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.2.238
11:49:50
12/05/2014
STEAM TEMPERATURE,
PRESSURE & GAS CONTENT
T = oF
P=
PSIA
350
137
Flash
Conditions
Gas Loading
in Steam
F, PSIA
ppmv
B4.1
5,418,000
3-stage turbo
T=
P=
350
137
6,500
T
P
235
23
10,000
B4.2
5,418,000
reboiler
T=
P=
350
137
6,500
T
P
235
23
10,000
B4.3
5,418,000
biphase
eductor
5,418,000
hybrid
T=
P=
350
137
6,500
T
P
235
23
10,000
T=
P=
350
137
6,500
T
P
235
23
10,000
B4.4
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.2.239
11:49:50
12/05/2014
STEAM TEMPERATURE,
PRESSURE & GAS CONTENT
T = oF
P=
PSIA
PLACE HOLDER
B5.1
B5.2
B5.3
Gas Loading
in Steam
F, PSIA
ppmv
PLACE HOLDER
Flash
Conditions
PLACE HOLDER
5,395,000
T=
350
2-stage ejector
P=
142
5,395,000
T=
350
3-stage turbo
P=
142
5,391,000
T=
350
reboiler
P=
142
5,395,000
T=
350
biphase
P=
142
5,395,000
T=
350
hybrid
P=
142
19,700
19,700
19,700
19,700
234
23
234
23
234
23
234
23
234
23
30,100
30,100
30,100
30,100
eductor
B5.4
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
19,700
Page 4.2.240
30,100
11:49:50
12/05/2014
STEAM TEMPERATURE,
PRESSURE & GAS CONTENT
T = oF
P=
PSIA
PLACE HOLDER
B6.1
B6.2
B6.3
Gas Loading
in Steam
F, PSIA
ppmv
PLACE HOLDER
Flash
Conditions
PLACE HOLDER
5,365,000
T=
350
2-stage ejector
P=
146
5,365,000
T=
350
3-stage turbo
P=
146
5,354,000
T=
350
reboiler
P=
146
5,365,000
T=
350
biphase
P=
146
5,365,000
T=
350
hybrid
P=
146
33,400
33,400
33,400
33,400
234
24
234
24
234
24
234
24
234
24
50,100
50,100
50,100
50,100
eductor
B6.4
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
33,400
Page 4.2.241
50,100
11:49:50
12/05/2014
STEAM TEMPERATURE,
PRESSURE & GAS CONTENT
T = oF
P=
PSIA
PLACE HOLDER
B7.1
B7.2
B7.3
Gas Loading
in Steam
F, PSIA
ppmv
PLACE HOLDER
Flash
Conditions
PLACE HOLDER
5,201,000
T=
350
2-stage ejector
P=
170
5,201,000
T=
350
3-stage turbo
P=
170
5,119,000
T=
350
reboiler
P=
170
5,201,000
T=
350
biphase
P=
170
5,201,000
T=
350
hybrid
P=
170
108,500
108,500
108,500
108,500
232
25
232
25
232
25
232
25
232
25
149,200
149,200
149,200
149,200
eductor
B7.4
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
108,500
Page 4.2.242
149,200
11:49:50
12/05/2014
STEAM TEMPERATURE,
PRESSURE & GAS CONTENT
T = oF
P=
PSIA
PLACE HOLDER
B8.1
B8.2
B8.3
Gas Loading
in Steam
F, PSIA
ppmv
PLACE HOLDER
Flash
Conditions
PLACE HOLDER
2,297,000
T=
550
2-stage ejector
P=
1316
2,297,000
T=
550
3-stage turbo
P=
1316
2,289,000
T=
550
reboiler
P=
1316
2,297,000
T=
550
biphase
P=
1316
2,297,000
T=
550
hybrid
P=
1316
99,700
99,700
99,700
99,700
333
119
333
119
333
119
333
119
333
119
99,600
99,600
99,600
99,600
eductor
B8.4
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
99,700
Page 4.2.243
99,600
11:49:50
12/05/2014
STEAM TEMPERATURE,
PRESSURE & GAS CONTENT
T = oF
P=
PSIA
PLACE HOLDER
Flash
Conditions
Gas Loading
in Steam
F, PSIA
ppmv
PLACE HOLDER
PLACE HOLDER
S1.1
S1.2
S1.3
2,291,000
T=
550
2-stage ejector
P=
1177
2,291,000
T=
550
3-stage turbo
P=
1177
2,289,000
T=
550
reboiler
P=
1177
2,291,000
T=
550
biphase
P=
1177
2,291,000
T=
550
hybrid
P=
1177
48,800
48,800
48,800
48,800
334
114
334
114
334
114
334
114
334
114
49,900
49,900
49,900
49,900
eductor
S1.4
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
48,800
Page 4.2.244
49,900
11:49:50
12/05/2014
STEAM TEMPERATURE,
PRESSURE & GAS CONTENT
T = oF
P=
PSIA
PLACE HOLDER
Flash
Conditions
Gas Loading
in Steam
F, PSIA
ppmv
PLACE HOLDER
PLACE HOLDER
S2.1
S2.2
S2.3
5,418,000
T=
350
2-stage ejector
P=
137
5,418,000
T=
350
3-stage turbo
P=
137
5,418,000
T=
350
reboiler
P=
137
5,418,000
T=
350
biphase
P=
137
5,418,000
T=
350
hybrid
P=
137
6,500
6,500
6,500
6,500
235
23
235
23
235
23
235
23
235
23
10,100
10,100
10,100
10,100
eductor
S2.4
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
6,500
Page 4.2.245
10,100
11:49:50
12/05/2014
STEAM TEMPERATURE,
PRESSURE & GAS CONTENT
T = oF
P=
PSIA
PLACE HOLDER
Flash
Conditions
Gas Loading
in Steam
F, PSIA
ppmv
PLACE HOLDER
PLACE HOLDER
S3.1
S3.2
S3.3
2,505,000
T=
550
2-stage ejector
P=
1124
2,505,000
T=
550
3-stage turbo
P=
1124
2,505,000
T=
550
reboiler
P=
1124
2,505,000
T=
550
biphase
P=
1124
2,505,000
T=
550
hybrid
P=
1124
28,900
28,900
28,900
28,900
344
128
344
128
344
128
344
128
344
128
30,400
30,400
30,400
30,400
eductor
S3.4
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
28,900
Page 4.2.246
30,400
11:49:50
12/05/2014
STEAM TEMPERATURE,
PRESSURE & GAS CONTENT
T = oF
P=
PSIA
PLACE HOLDER
Flash
Conditions
Gas Loading
in Steam
F, PSIA
ppmv
PLACE HOLDER
PLACE HOLDER
S4.1
S4.2
S4.3
6,251,000
T=
350
2-stage ejector
P=
137
6,251,000
T=
350
3-stage turbo
P=
137
6,250,000
T=
350
reboiler
P=
137
6,251,000
T=
350
biphase
P=
137
6,251,000
T=
350
hybrid
P=
137
6,400
6,400
6,400
6,400
244
27
244
27
244
27
244
27
244
27
10,100
10,100
10,100
10,100
eductor
S4.4
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
6,400
Page 4.2.247
10,100
11:49:50
12/05/2014
ENGINEERING FIGURES OF ME
POWER LOSS
TO GAS
REMOVAL
RESIDUAL
PLANT
CAPACITY
TECHNICAL FIGURE
OF MERIT
(A)
(B)
(C)
Percent of
Gross "Unit
Capacity"
B= 1-(A)
Megawatts
38.2
23.7%
76.3%
B1.1
968,000
40.5
19.1%
80.9%
B1.2
968,000
750,000
50.0
38.6
= clean steam turbine feed
22.9%
77.1%
1.01
B1.3
968,000
50.0
39.0
21.9%
78.1%
1.02
B1.4
968,000
50.0
39.9
20.2%
79.8%
1.05
Case
No.
TOTAL
FLOW
UNIT
CAPACITY
Steam +
Gases
Gross
Generator
Output
lbs / hour
Megawatts
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
50.0
ELECTRICITY
Page 4.2.248
MAIN GROUP 1
1.00
RETURN
1.06
11:49:50
12/05/2014
TOTAL
FLOW
UNIT
CAPACITY
ELECTRICITY
POWER LOSS
TO GAS
REMOVAL
RESIDUAL
PLANT
CAPACITY
TECHNICAL FIGURE
OF MERIT
(A)
(B)
(C)
RETURN
Case
No.
Steam +
Gases
Gross
Generator
Output
lbs / hour
Megawatts
Percent of
Gross "Unit
Capacity"
B= 1-(A)
Megawatts
RETURN
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.2.249
11:49:50
12/05/2014
POWER LOSS
TO GAS
REMOVAL
RESIDUAL
PLANT
CAPACITY
(A)
(B)
Percent of
Gross "Unit
Capacity"
B= 1-(A)
Megawatts
41.7
16.6%
83.4%
B2.1
932,000
43.3
13.5%
86.5%
B2.2
932,000
803,000
50.0
41.9
= clean steam turbine feed
16.2%
83.8%
1.01
B2.3
932,000
50.0
43.0
14.0%
86.0%
1.03
B2.4
932,000
50.0
42.9
14.2%
85.8%
1.03
45.4
9.2%
90.8%
MAIN GROUP 3
1.00
B3.1
896,000
46.0
7.9%
92.1%
1.01
B3.2
896,000
853,000
50.0
45.4
= clean steam turbine feed
9.2%
90.8%
1.00
B3.3
896,000
50.0
46.5
7.0%
93.0%
1.02
B3.4
896,000
50.0
45.9
8.1%
91.9%
1.01
Case
No.
TOTAL
FLOW
UNIT
CAPACITY
Steam +
Gases
Gross
Generator
Output
lbs / hour
Megawatts
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
50.0
50.0
ELECTRICITY
Page 4.2.250
TECHNICAL FIGURE
OF MERIT
RETURN
(C)
MAIN GROUP 2
1.00
RETURN
1.04
11:49:50
12/05/2014
POWER LOSS
TO GAS
REMOVAL
RESIDUAL
PLANT
CAPACITY
TECHNICAL FIGURE
OF MERIT
(A)
(B)
(C)
Percent of
Gross "Unit
Capacity"
B= 1-(A)
Megawatts
40.6
18.8%
81.2%
B4.1
1,446,000
43.2
13.5%
86.5%
B4.2
1,446,000
1,375,000
50.0
43.3
= clean steam turbine feed
13.3%
86.7%
1.07
B4.3
1,446,000
50.0
41.3
17.4%
82.6%
1.02
B4.4
1,446,000
50.0
42.7
14.6%
85.4%
1.05
Case
No.
TOTAL
FLOW
UNIT
CAPACITY
Steam +
Gases
Gross
Generator
Output
lbs / hour
Megawatts
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
50.0
ELECTRICITY
Page 4.2.251
MAIN GROUP 4
1.00
RETURN
1.07
11:49:50
12/05/2014
Case
No.
TOTAL
FLOW
UNIT
CAPACITY
Steam +
Gases
Gross
Generator
Output
lbs / hour
Megawatts
PLACE HOLDER
ELECTRICITY
POWER LOSS
TO GAS
REMOVAL
RESIDUAL
PLANT
CAPACITY
TECHNICAL FIGURE
OF MERIT
(A)
(B)
(C)
Percent of
Gross "Unit
Capacity"
B= 1-(A)
Megawatts
PLACE HOLDER
PLACE HOLDER
MAIN GROUP 5
RETURN
1.00
B-5
1,505,000
50.0
31.7
36.6%
63.4%
B5.1
1,505,000
50.0
38.8
22.5%
77.5%
1.22
B5.2
1,505,000
50.0
39.9
20.3%
79.7%
1.26
1,291,000
B5.3
1,505,000
50.0
32.8
34.4%
65.6%
1.03
B5.4
1,505,000
50.0
36.8
26.3%
73.7%
1.16
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.2.252
11:49:50
12/05/2014
Case
No.
TOTAL
FLOW
UNIT
CAPACITY
Steam +
Gases
Gross
Generator
Output
lbs / hour
Megawatts
PLACE HOLDER
ELECTRICITY
POWER LOSS
TO GAS
REMOVAL
RESIDUAL
PLANT
CAPACITY
TECHNICAL FIGURE
OF MERIT
(A)
(B)
(C)
Percent of
Gross "Unit
Capacity"
B= 1-(A)
Megawatts
PLACE HOLDER
PLACE HOLDER
MAIN GROUP 6
RETURN
1.00
B-6
1,563,000
50.0
24.8
50.4%
49.6%
B6.1
1,563,000
50.0
34.2
31.5%
68.5%
1.38
B6.2
1,563,000
50.0
36.6
26.8%
73.2%
1.48
1,203,000
B6.3
1,563,000
50.0
25.9
48.3%
51.7%
1.04
B6.4
1,563,000
50.0
31.1
37.8%
62.2%
1.25
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.2.253
11:49:50
12/05/2014
Case
No.
TOTAL
FLOW
UNIT
CAPACITY
Steam +
Gases
Gross
Generator
Output
lbs / hour
Megawatts
PLACE HOLDER
ELECTRICITY
POWER LOSS
TO GAS
REMOVAL
RESIDUAL
PLANT
CAPACITY
TECHNICAL FIGURE
OF MERIT
(A)
(B)
(C)
Percent of
Gross "Unit
Capacity"
B= 1-(A)
Megawatts
PLACE HOLDER
PLACE HOLDER
MAIN GROUP 7
RETURN
1.00
B-7
1,873,000
49.9
5.5
89.0%
11.0%
B7.1
1,873,000
49.9
11.2
77.5%
22.5%
2.04
B7.2
1,873,000
49.9
23.6
52.7%
47.3%
4.28
751,000
B7.3
1,873,000
49.9
7.1
85.7%
14.3%
1.29
B7.4
1,873,000
49.9
8.7
82.5%
17.5%
1.59
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.2.254
11:49:50
12/05/2014
Case
No.
TOTAL
FLOW
UNIT
CAPACITY
Steam +
Gases
Gross
Generator
Output
lbs / hour
Megawatts
PLACE HOLDER
ELECTRICITY
POWER LOSS
TO GAS
REMOVAL
RESIDUAL
PLANT
CAPACITY
TECHNICAL FIGURE
OF MERIT
(A)
(B)
(C)
Percent of
Gross "Unit
Capacity"
B= 1-(A)
Megawatts
PLACE HOLDER
PLACE HOLDER
MAIN GROUP 8
B-8
1,062,000
50.0
30.6
38.8%
61.2%
B8.1
1,062,000
50.0
33.4
33.2%
66.8%
1.09
B8.2
1,062,000
50.0
31.0
37.9%
62.1%
1.01
614,000
1.00
RETURN
B8.3
1,062,000
50.0
29.8
40.3%
59.7%
0.98
B8.4
1,062,000
50.0
32.7
34.5%
65.5%
1.07
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.2.255
11:49:50
12/05/2014
Case
No.
TOTAL
FLOW
UNIT
CAPACITY
Steam +
Gases
Gross
Generator
Output
lbs / hour
Megawatts
PLACE HOLDER
ELECTRICITY
POWER LOSS
TO GAS
REMOVAL
RESIDUAL
PLANT
CAPACITY
TECHNICAL FIGURE
OF MERIT
(A)
(B)
(C)
Percent of
Gross "Unit
Capacity"
B= 1-(A)
Megawatts
PLACE HOLDER
PLACE HOLDER
LOW EJECTOR EFFICIENCY
SENGROUP 1
RETURN
1.00
S-1
968,000
50.0
34.2
31.5%
68.5%
S1.1
968,000
50.0
40.5
19.0%
81.0%
1.18
S1.2
968,000
50.0
38.6
22.9%
77.1%
1.13
750,000
S1.3
968,000
50.0
35.8
28.5%
71.5%
1.04
S1.4
968,000
50.0
37.2
25.6%
74.4%
1.09
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.2.256
11:49:50
12/05/2014
Case
No.
TOTAL
FLOW
UNIT
CAPACITY
Steam +
Gases
Gross
Generator
Output
lbs / hour
Megawatts
PLACE HOLDER
ELECTRICITY
POWER LOSS
TO GAS
REMOVAL
RESIDUAL
PLANT
CAPACITY
TECHNICAL FIGURE
OF MERIT
(A)
(B)
(C)
Percent of
Gross "Unit
Capacity"
B= 1-(A)
Megawatts
PLACE HOLDER
PLACE HOLDER
LOW EJECTOR EFFICIENCY
SENGROUP 2
RETURN
1.00
S-2
1,446,000
50.0
38.7
22.6%
77.4%
S2.1
1,446,000
50.0
43.2
13.5%
86.5%
1.12
S2.2
1,446,000
50.0
43.3
13.3%
86.7%
1.12
1,375,000
S2.3
1,446,000
50.0
39.9
20.3%
79.7%
1.03
S2.4
1,446,000
50.0
41.6
16.7%
83.3%
1.08
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.2.257
11:49:50
12/05/2014
Case
No.
TOTAL
FLOW
UNIT
CAPACITY
Steam +
Gases
Gross
Generator
Output
lbs / hour
Megawatts
PLACE HOLDER
ELECTRICITY
POWER LOSS
TO GAS
REMOVAL
RESIDUAL
PLANT
CAPACITY
TECHNICAL FIGURE
OF MERIT
(A)
(B)
(C)
Percent of
Gross "Unit
Capacity"
B= 1-(A)
Megawatts
PLACE HOLDER
PLACE HOLDER
WET BULB TEMPERATURE 80 oF
SENGROUP 3
RETURN
1.00
S-3
1,001,000
50.0
42.2
15.6%
84.4%
S3.1
1,001,000
50.0
43.4
13.3%
86.7%
1.03
S3.2
1,001,000
50.0
41.7
16.7%
83.3%
0.99
860,000
S3.3
1,001,000
50.0
43.5
13.0%
87.0%
1.03
S3.4
1,001,000
50.0
43.1
13.8%
86.2%
1.02
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.2.258
11:49:50
12/05/2014
Case
No.
TOTAL
FLOW
UNIT
CAPACITY
Steam +
Gases
Gross
Generator
Output
lbs / hour
Megawatts
PLACE HOLDER
ELECTRICITY
POWER LOSS
TO GAS
REMOVAL
RESIDUAL
PLANT
CAPACITY
TECHNICAL FIGURE
OF MERIT
(A)
(B)
(C)
Percent of
Gross "Unit
Capacity"
B= 1-(A)
Megawatts
PLACE HOLDER
PLACE HOLDER
WET BULB TEMPERATURE 80 oF
SENGROUP 4
S-4
1,615,000
50.0
41.0
18.0%
82.0%
S4.1
1,615,000
50.0
42.8
14.4%
85.6%
1.04
S4.2
1,615,000
50.0
42.8
14.4%
85.6%
1.04
1,536,000
1.00
RETURN
S4.3
1,615,000
50.0
41.5
16.9%
83.1%
1.01
S4.4
1,615,000
50.0
42.4
15.1%
84.9%
1.04
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.2.259
11:49:50
12/05/2014
ECONOMIC FIG
Define an economic "figure of merit" that allocates dollars as credit for savings in parasitic power losses. Evaluate the cre
gas removal systems. Assign the "found" generating pow
Then calculate the figure of merit value as the payback period for the cost of investing in conversion to an alternative gas
recover the alternate technology investment costs. The shorter th
Configuration
Combined
Brine &
Steam Flow
lbs / hour
(at 15%
steam
quality)
T = F
o
P = PSIA
STEAM PRESSURE
AND TEMPERATURE
Combined
Brine &
Steam Gas
Conc'n.
parts
per
million by
weight
(ppmw) as
CO2
TOTAL FLOW
Flash
Conditio
ns
Gas
Content
Steam +
Gases
F, PSIA
ppmv
lbs / hour
60
MAIN CASE GROUP 1
HIGH TEMPERATURE/PRESSURE AND HIGH GAS CONTENT
B-1
BASE CASE
2,291,000 T =
550
48,800
2-stage ejectors
P=
1177
T
P
334
114
49,900
968,000
550
1177
48,800
T
P
334
114
49,900
968,000
550
1177
48,800
T
P
334
114
49,900
968,000
750,000
550
1177
48,800
T
P
334
114
49,900
968,000
48,800
T
P
334
114
49,900
968,000
334
29,900
932,000
Page 4.3.260
11:49:50
12/05/2014
Configuration
Combined
Brine &
Steam Flow
lbs / hour
(at 15%
steam
quality)
2-stage ejectors
T = F
o
P = PSIA
P
1,124
T
P
550
1,124
T
P
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Combined
Brine &
Steam Gas
Conc'n.
parts
per
million by
weight
(ppmw) as
CO2
STEAM PRESSURE
AND TEMPERATURE
TOTAL FLOW
Flash
Conditio
ns
Gas
Content
Steam +
Gases
F, PSIA
ppmv
lbs / hour
113
29,000
T
P
334
113
29,900
932,000
550
1,124
29,000
T
P
334
113
29,900
932,000
803,000
T
P
550
1,124
29,000
T
P
334
113
29,900
932,000
T
P
550
1,124
29,000
T
P
334
113
29,900
932,000
Page 4.3.261
11:49:50
12/05/2014
Combined
Configuration
Brine &
T = oF
Steam Flow
lbs / hour
(at 15%
P = PSIA
steam
quality)
MAIN CASE GROUP 3
STEAM PRESSURE
AND TEMPERATURE
Combined
Brine &
Steam Gas
Conc'n.
parts
per
million by
weight
(ppmw) as
CO2
TOTAL FLOW
Flash
Conditio
ns
Gas
Content
Steam +
Gases
F, PSIA
ppmv
lbs / hour
T
P
335
111
10,000
896,000
550
1072
9,600
T
P
335
111
10,000
896,000
550
1072
9,600
T
P
335
111
10,000
896,000
853,000
550
1072
9,600
T
P
335
111
10,000
896,000
9,600
T
P
335
111
10,000
896,000
T
P
235
23
10,000
1,446,000
T
P
350
137
6,500
T
P
235
23
10,000
1,446,000
T
P
350
137
6,500
T
P
235
23
10,000
1,446,000
1,375,000
T
P
350
137
6,500
T
P
235
23
10,000
1,446,000
T
P
350
137
6,500
T
P
235
23
10,000
1,446,000
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
PLACE HOLDER
Page 4.3.262
PLACE HOLDER
11:49:51
12/05/2014
Configuration
Combined
Brine &
Steam Flow
lbs / hour
(at 15%
steam
quality)
T = F
o
P = PSIA
STEAM PRESSURE
AND TEMPERATURE
Combined
Brine &
Steam Gas
Conc'n.
parts
per
million by
weight
(ppmw) as
CO2
TOTAL FLOW
Flash
Conditio
ns
Gas
Content
Steam +
Gases
F, PSIA
ppmv
lbs / hour
BASE CASE
5,395,000 T =
350
P=
142
350
2-stage ejectors
3-stage turbo-
P=
142
350
19,700
19,700
234
23
234
23
234
23
234
23
234
23
30,100
1,505,000
30,100
1,505,000
30,100
1,505,000
compressor
reboiler
P=
142
350
biphase eductor
P=
142
350
hybrid turbo-
P=
19,700
19,700
19,700
142
compressor
PLACE HOLDER
1,291,000
30,100
1,505,000
30,100
1,505,000
PLACE HOLDER
PLACE HOLDER
BASE CASE
5,365,000
2-stage ejectors
350
146
350
146
33,400
33,400
234
24
234
24
50,100
1,563,000
50,100
1,563,000
compressor
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.3.263
11:49:51
12/05/2014
Configuration
Combined
Brine &
Steam Flow
lbs / hour
(at 15%
steam
quality)
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
T = oF
P = PSIA
T
350
146
350
146
350
146
Combined
Brine &
Steam Gas
Conc'n.
parts
per
million by
weight
(ppmw) as
CO2
33,400
33,400
33,400
STEAM PRESSURE
AND TEMPERATURE
Page 4.3.264
Flash
Conditio
ns
Gas
Content
Steam +
Gases
F, PSIA
ppmv
lbs / hour
234
24
234
24
234
24
PLACE HOLDER
TOTAL FLOW
50,100
1,563,000
1,203,000
50,100
1,563,000
50,100
1,563,000
PLACE HOLDER
11:49:51
12/05/2014
Configuration
Combined
Brine &
Steam Flow
lbs / hour
(at 15%
steam
quality)
T = F
o
P = PSIA
STEAM PRESSURE
AND TEMPERATURE
Combined
Brine &
Steam Gas
Conc'n.
parts
per
million by
weight
(ppmw) as
CO2
TOTAL FLOW
Flash
Conditio
ns
Gas
Content
Steam +
Gases
F, PSIA
ppmv
lbs / hour
232
149,200
1,873,000
25
232
149,200
1,873,000
25
232
149,200
1,873,000
25
232
25
232
25
BASE CASE
5,201,000 T =
350
P=
170
350
2-stage ejectors
3-stage turbo-
P=
170
350
108,500
108,500
compressor
reboiler
P=
170
350
biphase eductor
P=
170
350
hybrid turbo-
P=
108,500
108,500
108,500
170
compressor
PLACE HOLDER
MAIN CASE GROUP 8
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
149,200
1,873,000
149,200
1,873,000
PLACE HOLDER
751,000
PLACE HOLDER
333
119
99,600
1,062,000
T
P
550
1,316
99,700
T
P
333
119
99,600
1,062,000
T
P
550
1,316
99,700
T
P
333
119
99,600
1,062,000
614,000
Page 4.3.265
11:49:51
12/05/2014
Configuration
Combined
Brine &
Steam Flow
lbs / hour
(at 15%
steam
quality)
T = oF
P = PSIA
STEAM PRESSURE
AND TEMPERATURE
Combined
Brine &
Steam Gas
Conc'n.
parts
per
million by
weight
(ppmw) as
CO2
TOTAL FLOW
Flash
Conditio
ns
Gas
Content
Steam +
Gases
F, PSIA
ppmv
lbs / hour
T
P
550
1,316
99,700
T
P
333
119
99,600
1,062,000
T
P
550
1,316
99,700
T
P
333
119
99,600
1,062,000
compressor
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
PLACE HOLDER
Page 4.3.266
PLACE HOLDER
11:49:51
12/05/2014
Configuration
Combined
Brine &
Steam Flow
lbs / hour
(at 15%
steam
quality)
T = oF
P = PSIA
STEAM PRESSURE
AND TEMPERATURE
Combined
Brine &
Steam Gas
Conc'n.
parts
per
million by
weight
(ppmw) as
CO2
Flash
Conditio
ns
Gas
Content
Steam +
Gases
F, PSIA
ppmv
lbs / hour
TOTAL FLOW
BASE CASE
2,291,000
2-stage ejectors
550
48,800
1,177
550
1,177
550
1,177
550
1,177
550
1,177
48,800
334
114
334
114
334
114
334
114
334
114
49,900
968,000
49,900
968,000
49,900
968,000
compressor
S1.2 ALTERNATIVE B 2,289,000
reboiler
48,800
48,800
48,800
compressor
PLACE HOLDER
750,000
49,900
968,000
49,900
968,000
PLACE HOLDER
PLACE HOLDER
LOW STEAM JET EJECTOR EFFICIENCY
BASE CASE
5,418,000
2-stage ejectors
S2.1 ALTERNATIVE A 5,418,000
3-stage turbo-
350
137
350
137
350
6,500
6,500
235
23
235
23
235
10,100
1,446,000
10,100
1,446,000
10,100
1,446,000
compressor
S2.2 ALTERNATIVE B 5,418,000
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
6,500
Page 4.3.267
11:49:51
12/05/2014
Configuration
Combined
Brine &
Steam Flow
lbs / hour
(at 15%
steam
quality)
reboiler
S2.3 ALTERNATIVE C 5,418,000
biphase eductor
S2.4 ALTERNATIVE D 5,418,000
hybrid turbocompressor
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
T = F
o
P = PSIA
P
137
350
137
350
137
Combined
Brine &
Steam Gas
Conc'n.
parts
per
million by
weight
(ppmw) as
CO2
6,500
6,500
STEAM PRESSURE
AND TEMPERATURE
Page 4.3.268
Flash
Conditio
ns
Gas
Content
Steam +
Gases
F, PSIA
ppmv
lbs / hour
23
235
23
235
23
PLACE HOLDER
TOTAL FLOW
1,375,000
10,100
1,446,000
10,100
1,446,000
PLACE HOLDER
11:49:51
12/05/2014
Configuration
Combined
Brine &
Steam Flow
lbs / hour
(at 15%
steam
quality)
T = oF
P = PSIA
STEAM PRESSURE
AND TEMPERATURE
Combined
Brine &
Steam Gas
Conc'n.
parts
per
million by
weight
(ppmw) as
CO2
Flash
Conditio
ns
Gas
Content
Steam +
Gases
F, PSIA
ppmv
lbs / hour
TOTAL FLOW
BASE CASE
2,505,000
550
30,400
1,001,000
1,124
550
30,400
1,001,000
1,124
T
P
550
1,124
344
128
30,400
1,001,000
860,000
T
P
550
1,124
T
P
344
128
30,400
1,001,000
344
128
30,400
1,001,000
244
27
10,100
1,615,000
T
P
350
137
6,400
T
P
244
27
10,100
1,615,000
T
P
350
137
6,400
T
P
244
27
10,100
1,615,000
1,536,000
350
6,400
244
10,100
1,615,000
2-stage ejectors
28,900
344
128
344
128
28,900
T
P
28,900
28,900
compressor
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.3.269
PLACE HOLDER
80 oF WET BULB TEMPERATURE
11:49:51
12/05/2014
Configuration
Combined
Brine &
Steam Flow
lbs / hour
(at 15%
steam
quality)
biphase eductor
T = oF
P = PSIA
P
137
350
137
STEAM PRESSURE
AND TEMPERATURE
Combined
Brine &
Steam Gas
Conc'n.
parts
per
million by
weight
(ppmw) as
CO2
6,400
TOTAL FLOW
Flash
Conditio
ns
Gas
Content
Steam +
Gases
F, PSIA
ppmv
lbs / hour
27
244
27
10,100
1,615,000
compressor
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.3.270
11:49:51
12/05/2014
losses. Evaluate the credits by calculating the equivalent electrical generating output of the steam and electricity used to run the nonconde
e "found" generating power a unit value (see worksheet tab 2.2 -- "Bases&Input").
ion to an alternative gas removal system: Divide the investment cost by the "found power" revenue value ($ per year), yielding a value of ye
ent costs. The shorter the payback period, the better the option is as a recoverable cost.
ROSS POWER
NET SALES
POWER
AVAILABLE
UNIT
ELECTRICITY
CAPACITY
Gross
Generator
Output
Megawatts
POWER
LOSS TO
GAS
REMOVAL
NET PLANT
PRODUCTIVITY
AFTER "GAS
LOSS"
(A)
(B)
Percent of
gross "Unit
Capacity"
Megawatts
COSTS OF DESIGN
ALTERNATIVES
CAPITAL
(installed)
B= 1-(A)
VALUE OF UNEXPENDED
PARASITIC POWER AS A
SALABLE PRODUCT
Net Unexpended
ANNUAL O &
Power Available
M
for Sale
$ / year
Kilowatt-hours per
year
50.0
38.2
23.7%
76.3%
50.0
40.5
19.1%
80.9%
22.9%
50.0
38.6
= clean steam turbine feed
N/A
86,900
4,800,000
240,000
18,050,000
77.1%
5,177,000
259,000
3,020,000
50.0
39.0
21.9%
78.1%
2,228,000
111,000
6,890,000
50.0
39.9
20.2%
79.8%
1,200,000
60,000
13,660,000
50.0
41.7
16.6%
83.4%
N/A
62,500
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.3.271
ROSS POWER
NET SALES
POWER
AVAILABLE
UNIT
ELECTRICITY
CAPACITY
Gross
Generator
Output
POWER
LOSS TO
GAS
REMOVAL
NET PLANT
PRODUCTIVITY
AFTER "GAS
LOSS"
(A)
(B)
Percent of
gross "Unit
Capacity"
COSTS OF DESIGN
ALTERNATIVES
CAPITAL
(installed)
B= 1-(A)
VALUE OF UNEXPENDED
PARASITIC POWER AS A
SALABLE PRODUCT
Net Unexpended
ANNUAL O &
Power Available
M
for Sale
Megawatts
50.0
43.3
13.5%
86.5%
2,400,000
120,000
12,600,000
16.2%
83.8%
5,394,000
270,000
1,700,000
50.0
41.9
= clean steam turbine feed
$ / year
Kilowatt-hours per
year
Megawatts
50.0
43.0
14.0%
86.0%
2,262,000
113,000
10,300,000
50.0
42.9
14.2%
85.8%
600,000
30,000
9,500,000
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.3.272
11:49:51
12/05/2014
ROSS POWER
NET SALES
POWER
AVAILABLE
UNIT
ELECTRICITY
CAPACITY
Gross
Generator
Output
POWER
LOSS TO
GAS
REMOVAL
NET PLANT
PRODUCTIVITY
AFTER "GAS
LOSS"
(A)
(B)
Percent of
gross "Unit
Capacity"
CAPITAL
(installed)
B= 1-(A)
Megawatts
Megawatts
50.0
45.4
9.2%
90.8%
50.0
46.0
7.9%
92.1%
9.2%
50.0
45.4
= clean steam turbine feed
VALUE OF UNEXPENDED
PARASITIC POWER AS A
SALABLE PRODUCT
COSTS OF DESIGN
ALTERNATIVES
Net Unexpended
ANNUAL O &
Power Available
M
for Sale
$ / year
Kilowatt-hours per
year
N/A
31,600
1,740,000
87,000
5,200,000
90.8%
5,593,000
280,000
200,000
50.0
46.5
7.0%
93.0%
2,119,000
106,000
8,700,000
50.0
45.9
8.1%
91.9%
300,000
15,000
4,500,000
50.0
40.6
18.8%
81.2%
N/A
42,200
50.0
43.2
13.5%
86.5%
2,040,000
102,000
20,800,000
13.3%
86.7%
7,812,000
391,000
21,500,000
50.0
43.3
= clean steam turbine feed
50.0
41.3
17.4%
82.6%
4,313,000
216,000
5,600,000
50.0
42.7
14.6%
85.4%
600,000
30,000
16,500,000
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
PLACE HOLDER
Page 4.3.273
PLACE HOLD
11:49:51
12/05/2014
ROSS POWER
NET SALES
POWER
AVAILABLE
UNIT
ELECTRICITY
CAPACITY
Gross
Generator
Output
Megawatts
POWER
LOSS TO
GAS
REMOVAL
NET PLANT
PRODUCTIVITY
AFTER "GAS
LOSS"
(A)
(B)
Percent of
gross "Unit
Capacity"
Megawatts
VALUE OF UNEXPENDED
PARASITIC POWER AS A
SALABLE PRODUCT
COSTS OF DESIGN
ALTERNATIVES
CAPITAL
(installed)
B= 1-(A)
Net Unexpended
ANNUAL O &
Power Available
M
for Sale
$ / year
Kilowatt-hours per
year
31.7
36.6%
63.4%
N/A
83,700
N/A
50.0
38.8
22.5%
77.5%
4,800,000
240,000
55,700,000
50.0
39.9
20.3%
79.7%
7,522,000
376,000
64,200,000
50.0
32.8
34.4%
65.6%
4,259,000
213,000
8,600,000
50.0
36.8
26.3%
73.7%
1,200,000
60,000
40,500,000
PLACE HOLDER
PLACE HOLDER
PLACE HOLD
24.8
50.4%
49.6%
50.0
34.2
31.5%
68.5%
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.3.274
N/A
116,200
N/A
9,600,000
480,000
74,300,000
11:49:51
12/05/2014
ROSS POWER
NET SALES
POWER
AVAILABLE
UNIT
ELECTRICITY
CAPACITY
Gross
Generator
Output
POWER
LOSS TO
GAS
REMOVAL
NET PLANT
PRODUCTIVITY
AFTER "GAS
LOSS"
(A)
(B)
Percent of
gross "Unit
Capacity"
VALUE OF UNEXPENDED
PARASITIC POWER AS A
SALABLE PRODUCT
COSTS OF DESIGN
ALTERNATIVES
CAPITAL
(installed)
B= 1-(A)
Net Unexpended
ANNUAL O &
Power Available
M
for Sale
$ / year
Kilowatt-hours per
year
Megawatts
Megawatts
50.0
36.6
26.8%
73.2%
7,210,000
361,000
93,000,000
50.0
25.9
48.3%
51.7%
4,200,000
210,000
8,400,000
50.0
31.1
37.8%
62.2%
2,400,000
120,000
49,800,000
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
PLACE HOLDER
Page 4.3.275
PLACE HOLD
11:49:51
12/05/2014
ROSS POWER
NET SALES
POWER
AVAILABLE
UNIT
ELECTRICITY
CAPACITY
Gross
Generator
Output
Megawatts
POWER
LOSS TO
GAS
REMOVAL
NET PLANT
PRODUCTIVITY
AFTER "GAS
LOSS"
(A)
(B)
Percent of
gross "Unit
Capacity"
Megawatts
VALUE OF UNEXPENDED
PARASITIC POWER AS A
SALABLE PRODUCT
COSTS OF DESIGN
ALTERNATIVES
CAPITAL
(installed)
B= 1-(A)
Net Unexpended
ANNUAL O &
Power Available
M
for Sale
$ / year
Kilowatt-hours per
year
5.5
89.0%
11.0%
N/A
49.9
11.2
77.5%
22.5%
34,680,000
49.9
23.6
52.7%
47.3%
249,200
N/A
$ 1,734,000
45,200,000
5,434,000
272,000
142,700,000
49.9
7.1
85.7%
14.3%
3,877,000
194,000
12,800,000
49.9
8.7
82.5%
17.5%
8,400,000
420,000
25,400,000
PLACE HOLDER
PLACE HOLDER
50.0
30.6
38.8%
61.2%
50.0
33.4
33.2%
66.8%
37.9%
62.1%
50.0
31.0
= clean steam turbine feed
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
N/A
Page 4.3.276
PLACE HOLD
MAIN CASE GROUP 8
N/A
139,100
12,360,000
618,000
22,100,000
4,592,000
230,000
3,600,000
11:49:51
12/05/2014
ROSS POWER
NET SALES
POWER
AVAILABLE
UNIT
ELECTRICITY
CAPACITY
Gross
Generator
Output
POWER
LOSS TO
GAS
REMOVAL
NET PLANT
PRODUCTIVITY
AFTER "GAS
LOSS"
(A)
(B)
Percent of
gross "Unit
Capacity"
VALUE OF UNEXPENDED
PARASITIC POWER AS A
SALABLE PRODUCT
COSTS OF DESIGN
ALTERNATIVES
CAPITAL
(installed)
B= 1-(A)
Net Unexpended
ANNUAL O &
Power Available
M
for Sale
Megawatts
50.0
29.8
40.3%
59.7%
2,137,000
107,000
-5,800,000
50.0
32.7
34.5%
65.5%
3,000,000
150,000
17,000,000
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
$ / year
Kilowatt-hours per
year
Megawatts
PLACE HOLDER
Page 4.3.277
PLACE HOLD
11:49:51
12/05/2014
ROSS POWER
NET SALES
POWER
AVAILABLE
UNIT
ELECTRICITY
CAPACITY
Gross
Generator
Output
Megawatts
POWER
LOSS TO
GAS
REMOVAL
NET PLANT
PRODUCTIVITY
AFTER "GAS
LOSS"
(A)
(B)
Percent of
gross "Unit
Capacity"
Megawatts
VALUE OF UNEXPENDED
PARASITIC POWER AS A
SALABLE PRODUCT
COSTS OF DESIGN
ALTERNATIVES
CAPITAL
(installed)
B= 1-(A)
Net Unexpended
ANNUAL O &
Power Available
M
for Sale
$ / year
Kilowatt-hours per
year
OR EFFICIENCY
50.0
34.2
31.5%
68.5%
N/A
86,900
N/A
50.0
40.5
19.0%
81.0%
4,800,000
240,000
49,300,000
50.0
38.6
22.9%
77.1%
5,177,000
259,000
34,000,000
CASE GROUP
50.0
35.8
28.5%
71.5%
2,228,000
111,000
11,900,000
50.0
37.2
25.6%
74.4%
1,200,000
60,000
23,500,000
PLACE HOLDER
PLACE HOLDER
OR EFFICIENCY
PLACE HOLD
50.0
38.7
22.6%
77.4%
50.0
43.2
13.5%
86.5%
50.0
43.3
13.3%
86.7%
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
N/A
42,400
N/A
2,040,000
102,000
35,600,000
7,812,000
391,000
36,400,000
Page 4.3.278
CASE GROUP
11:49:51
12/05/2014
ROSS POWER
NET SALES
POWER
AVAILABLE
UNIT
ELECTRICITY
CAPACITY
Gross
Generator
Output
Megawatts
POWER
LOSS TO
GAS
REMOVAL
NET PLANT
PRODUCTIVITY
AFTER "GAS
LOSS"
(A)
(B)
Percent of
gross "Unit
Capacity"
Megawatts
VALUE OF UNEXPENDED
PARASITIC POWER AS A
SALABLE PRODUCT
COSTS OF DESIGN
ALTERNATIVES
CAPITAL
(installed)
B= 1-(A)
Net Unexpended
ANNUAL O &
Power Available
M
for Sale
$ / year
Kilowatt-hours per
year
39.9
20.3%
79.7%
4,313,000
216,000
9,100,000
50.0
41.6
16.7%
83.3%
600,000
30,000
23,000,000
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
PLACE HOLDER
Page 4.3.279
PLACE HOLD
11:49:51
12/05/2014
ROSS POWER
NET SALES
POWER
AVAILABLE
UNIT
ELECTRICITY
CAPACITY
Gross
Generator
Output
Megawatts
POWER
LOSS TO
GAS
REMOVAL
NET PLANT
PRODUCTIVITY
AFTER "GAS
LOSS"
(A)
(B)
Percent of
gross "Unit
Capacity"
Megawatts
COSTS OF DESIGN
ALTERNATIVES
CAPITAL
(installed)
B= 1-(A)
VALUE OF UNEXPENDED
PARASITIC POWER AS A
SALABLE PRODUCT
Net Unexpended
ANNUAL O &
Power Available
M
for Sale
$ / year
MPERATURE
Kilowatt-hours per
year
50.0
42.2
15.6%
84.4%
50.0
43.4
13.3%
86.7%
16.7%
50.0
41.7
= clean steam turbine feed
N/A
65,900
N/A
3,120,000
156,000
9,200,000
83.3%
5,620,000
281,000
-4,500,000
50.0
43.5
13.0%
87.0%
2,407,000
120,000
10,100,000
50.0
43.1
13.8%
86.2%
600,000
30,000
7,000,000
PLACE HOLDER
MPERATURE
PLACE HOLDER
PLACE HOLD
80 oF WET BULB TEMPERATU
SENSITIVITY CASE GROUP
$
45,300
N/A
50.0
41.0
18.0%
82.0%
50.0
42.8
14.4%
85.6%
2,400,000
120,000
14,400,000
14.4%
85.6%
8,348,000
417,000
14,100,000
16.9%
83.1%
4,732,000
237,000
4,400,000
50.0
42.8
= clean steam turbine feed
50.0
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
41.5
N/A
Page 4.3.280
CASE GROUP
11:49:51
12/05/2014
ROSS POWER
NET SALES
POWER
AVAILABLE
UNIT
ELECTRICITY
CAPACITY
Gross
Generator
Output
POWER
LOSS TO
GAS
REMOVAL
NET PLANT
PRODUCTIVITY
AFTER "GAS
LOSS"
(A)
(B)
Percent of
gross "Unit
Capacity"
Megawatts
Megawatts
50.0
42.4
15.1%
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
COSTS OF DESIGN
ALTERNATIVES
CAPITAL
(installed)
B= 1-(A)
Net Unexpended
ANNUAL O &
Power Available
M
for Sale
84.9%
Page 4.3.281
600,000
VALUE OF UNEXPENDED
PARASITIC POWER AS A
SALABLE PRODUCT
$ / year
30,000
Kilowatt-hours per
year
11,300,000
11:49:51
12/05/2014
VALUE OF UNEXPENDED
PARASITIC POWER AS A
SALABLE PRODUCT
FIGURE
OF
MERIT
Sales value of
unexpended
power
PAYOUT
PERIOD
$ / year
"simple
payback"
(years)
RETURN
MAIN CASE GROUP 1
N/A
$
722,000
8.4
120,800
-100.9
275,600
13.5
546,400
2.1
N/A
N/A
Page 4.3.282
11:49:51
12/05/2014
RETURN
VALUE OF UNEXPENDED
PARASITIC POWER AS A
SALABLE PRODUCT
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
FIGURE
OF
MERIT
Sales value of
unexpended
power
PAYOUT
PERIOD
$ / year
"simple
payback"
(years)
504,000
5.4
68,000
-38.7
412,000
7.6
380,000
1.5
Page 4.3.283
RETURN
11:49:51
12/05/2014
VALUE OF UNEXPENDED
PARASITIC POWER AS A
SALABLE PRODUCT
FIGURE
OF
MERIT
Sales value of
unexpended
power
PAYOUT
PERIOD
$ / year
"simple
payback"
(years)
N/A
208,000
11.4
8,000
-23.3
348,000
7.7
180,000
1.5
RETURN
N/A
832,000
2.6
860,000
15.3
224,000
539.1
660,000
0.9
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.3.284
11:49:51
12/05/2014
FIGURE
OF
MERIT
Sales value of
unexpended
power
PAYOUT
PERIOD
$ / year
"simple
payback"
(years)
N/A
RETURN
$
2,228,000
2.3
2,568,000
3.3
344,000
32.5
1,620,000
0.7
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
N/A
N/A
2,972,000
3.7
Page 4.3.285
11:49:51
12/05/2014
VALUE OF UNEXPENDED
PARASITIC POWER AS A
SALABLE PRODUCT
FIGURE
OF
MERIT
Sales value of
unexpended
power
PAYOUT
PERIOD
$ / year
"simple
payback"
(years)
3,720,000
2.1
336,000
33.3
1,992,000
1.2
RETURN
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.3.286
11:49:51
12/05/2014
FIGURE
OF
MERIT
Sales value of
unexpended
power
PAYOUT
PERIOD
$ / year
"simple
payback"
(years)
N/A
RETURN
$
1,808,000
107.3
5,708,000
1.0
512,000
6.8
1,016,000
9.9
PLACE HOLDER
MAIN CASE GROUP 8
N/A
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
N/A
884,000
30.5
144,000
86.5
Page 4.3.287
11:49:51
12/05/2014
VALUE OF UNEXPENDED
PARASITIC POWER AS A
SALABLE PRODUCT
FIGURE
OF
MERIT
Sales value of
unexpended
power
PAYOUT
PERIOD
$ / year
"simple
payback"
(years)
(232,000)
-6.3
680,000
4.5
RETURN
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.3.288
11:49:51
12/05/2014
FIGURE
OF
MERIT
Sales value of
unexpended
power
PAYOUT
PERIOD
$ / year
"simple
payback"
(years)
CASE GROUP S - 1
N/A
N/A
RETURN
$
1,972,000
2.6
1,360,000
4.4
476,000
6.1
940,000
1.2
PLACE HOLDER
LOW EJECTOR EFFICIENCY
SENSITIVITY
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
CASE GROUP S - 2
N/A
N/A
1,424,000
1.5
1,456,000
7.1
Page 4.3.289
11:49:51
12/05/2014
VALUE OF UNEXPENDED
PARASITIC POWER AS A
SALABLE PRODUCT
FIGURE
OF
MERIT
Sales value of
unexpended
power
PAYOUT
PERIOD
$ / year
"simple
payback"
(years)
364,000
29.1
RETURN
$
920,000
0.6
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.3.290
11:49:51
12/05/2014
FIGURE
OF
MERIT
Sales value of
unexpended
power
PAYOUT
PERIOD
$ / year
"simple
payback"
(years)
CASE GROUP S - 3
N/A
N/A
RETURN
$
368,000
11.2
(180,000)
-14.2
404,000
8.5
280,000
1.9
PLACE HOLDER
80 oF WET BULB TEMPERATURE
SENSITIVITY CASE GROUP S - 4
N/A
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
N/A
576,000
4.8
564,000
43.4
176,000
-77.6
Page 4.3.291
11:49:51
12/05/2014
VALUE OF UNEXPENDED
PARASITIC POWER AS A
SALABLE PRODUCT
FIGURE
OF
MERIT
Sales value of
unexpended
power
PAYOUT
PERIOD
$ / year
"simple
payback"
(years)
452,000
1.3
RETURN
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.3.292
11:49:51
12/05/2014
ECONOMIC FIGURE OF
Define an economic "figure of merit" that allocates dollars as credit for savings in parasitic power losses. Eva
noncondensable gas removal systems. Assign the "found" gen
Then calculate the figure of merit value as the net present value for the cost of investing in conversion to an alt
cash flows. Input defining the financial v
Configuration
Combined
Brine & Steam
Gas Conc'n.
parts per
million by
P = PSIA
weight (ppmw)
as CO2
Combined Brine
& Steam Flow
T = oF
B-1
B1.1
STEAM PRESSURE
AND TEMPERATURE
Flash
Condition
s
Gas
Content
F, PSIA
ppmv
T
P
334
114
49,900
ALTERNATIVE A
3-stage turbocompressor
ALTERNATIVE B
reboiler
2,291,000
T=
P=
550
1177
48,800
T
P
334
114
49,900
2,289,000
T=
P=
550
1177
48,800
T
P
334
114
49,900
B1.3
ALTERNATIVE C
biphase eductor
2,291,000
T=
P=
550
1177
48,800
T
P
334
114
49,900
B1.4
ALTERNATIVE D
hybrid turbocompressor
2,291,000
T=
P=
550
1177
48,800
T
P
334
114
49,900
T
P
334
113
29,900
ALTERNATIVE A
3-stage turbo-
T
P
334
113
29,900
B1.2
B-2
B2.1
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
2,288,000
T
P
550
1,124
Page 4.3a.293
29,000
11:49:51
12/05/2014
Configuration
Combined
Brine & Steam
Gas Conc'n.
parts per
million by
P = PSIA
weight (ppmw)
as CO2
Combined Brine
& Steam Flow
T = oF
B2.2
compressor
ALTERNATIVE B
reboiler
STEAM PRESSURE
AND TEMPERATURE
Flash
Condition
s
Gas
Content
F, PSIA
ppmv
2,287,000
T
P
550
1,124
29,000
T
P
334
113
29,900
B2.3
ALTERNATIVE C
biphase eductor
2,288,000
T
P
550
1,124
29,000
T
P
334
113
29,900
B2.4
ALTERNATIVE D
hybrid turbocompressor
2,288,000
T
P
550
1,124
29,000
T
P
334
113
29,900
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.3a.294
11:49:51
12/05/2014
Configuration
Combined
Brine & Steam
Gas Conc'n.
parts per
million by
P = PSIA
weight (ppmw)
as CO2
Combined Brine
& Steam Flow
T = oF
B-3
B3.1
STEAM PRESSURE
AND TEMPERATURE
Flash
Condition
s
Gas
Content
F, PSIA
ppmv
T
P
335
111
10,000
ALTERNATIVE A
3-stage turbocompressor
ALTERNATIVE B
reboiler
2,284,000
T=
P=
550
1072
9,600
T
P
335
111
10,000
2,284,000
T=
P=
550
1072
9,600
T
P
335
111
10,000
B3.3
ALTERNATIVE C
biphase eductor
2,284,000
T=
P=
550
1072
9,600
T
P
335
111
10,000
B3.4
ALTERNATIVE D
hybrid turbocompressor
2,284,000
T=
P=
550
1072
9,600
T
P
335
111
10,000
T
P
235
23
10,000
B3.2
B-4
B4.1
5,418,000
T
P
350
137
6,500
T
P
235
23
10,000
5,418,000
T
P
350
137
6,500
T
P
235
23
10,000
B4.3
ALTERNATIVE C
biphase eductor
5,418,000
T
P
350
137
6,500
T
P
235
23
10,000
B4.4
ALTERNATIVE D
hybrid turbocompressor
PLACE HOLDER
5,418,000
T
P
350
137
6,500
T
P
235
23
10,000
B4.2
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
PLACE HOLDER
Page 4.3a.295
11:49:51
12/05/2014
Configuration
Combined
Brine & Steam
Gas Conc'n.
parts per
million by
P = PSIA
weight (ppmw)
as CO2
Combined Brine
& Steam Flow
T = oF
B-5
B5.1
STEAM PRESSURE
AND TEMPERATURE
Flash
Condition
s
Gas
Content
F, PSIA
ppmv
T
P
234
23
30,100
ALTERNATIVE A
3-stage turbocompressor
ALTERNATIVE B
reboiler
5,395,000
T=
P=
350
142
19,700
T
P
234
23
30,100
5,391,000
T=
P=
350
142
19,700
T
P
234
23
30,100
B5.3
ALTERNATIVE C
biphase eductor
5,395,000
T=
P=
350
142
19,700
T
P
234
23
30,100
B5.4
ALTERNATIVE D
hybrid turbocompressor
PLACE HOLDER
5,395,000
T=
P=
350
142
19,700
T
P
234
23
30,100
T
P
234
24
50,100
B5.2
PLACE HOLDER
ALTERNATIVE A
3-stage turbocompressor
ALTERNATIVE B
reboiler
5,365,000
T
P
350
146
33,400
T
P
234
24
50,100
5,354,000
T
P
350
146
33,400
T
P
234
24
50,100
B6.3
ALTERNATIVE C
biphase eductor
5,365,000
T
P
350
146
33,400
T
P
234
24
50,100
B6.4
ALTERNATIVE D
hybrid turbocompressor
5,365,000
T
P
350
146
33,400
T
P
234
24
50,100
B6.2
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.3a.296
11:49:51
12/05/2014
Configuration
Combined Brine
& Steam Flow
lbs / hour (at
15% steam
quality)
Combined
Brine & Steam
Gas Conc'n.
parts per
million by
P = PSIA
weight (ppmw)
as CO2
T = oF
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
STEAM PRESSURE
AND TEMPERATURE
Flash
Condition
s
Gas
Content
F, PSIA
ppmv
PLACE HOLDER
Page 4.3a.297
11:49:51
12/05/2014
Configuration
Combined
Brine & Steam
Gas Conc'n.
parts per
million by
P = PSIA
weight (ppmw)
as CO2
Combined Brine
& Steam Flow
T = oF
STEAM PRESSURE
AND TEMPERATURE
Flash
Condition
s
Gas
Content
F, PSIA
ppmv
T
P
232
25
149,200
ALTERNATIVE A
3-stage turbocompressor
ALTERNATIVE B
reboiler
5,201,000
T=
P=
350
170
108,500
T
P
232
25
149,200
5,119,000
T=
P=
350
170
108,500
T
P
232
25
149,200
B7.3
ALTERNATIVE C
biphase eductor
5,201,000
T=
P=
350
170
108,500
T
P
232
25
149,200
B7.4
ALTERNATIVE D
hybrid turbocompressor
PLACE HOLDER
5,201,000
T=
P=
350
170
108,500
T
P
232
25
149,200
T
P
333
119
99,600
B7.2
PLACE HOLDER
ALTERNATIVE A
3-stage turbocompressor
ALTERNATIVE B
reboiler
2,297,000
T
P
550
1,316
99,700
T
P
333
119
99,600
2,289,000
T
P
550
1,316
99,700
T
P
333
119
99,600
B8.3
ALTERNATIVE C
biphase eductor
2,297,000
T
P
550
1,316
99,700
T
P
333
119
99,600
B8.4
ALTERNATIVE D
hybrid turbocompressor
2,297,000
T
P
550
1,316
99,700
T
P
333
119
99,600
B8.2
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.3a.298
11:49:51
12/05/2014
Configuration
Combined Brine
& Steam Flow
lbs / hour (at
15% steam
quality)
Combined
Brine & Steam
Gas Conc'n.
parts per
million by
P = PSIA
weight (ppmw)
as CO2
T = oF
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
STEAM PRESSURE
AND TEMPERATURE
Flash
Condition
s
Gas
Content
F, PSIA
ppmv
PLACE HOLDER
Page 4.3a.299
11:49:51
12/05/2014
Configuration
Combined
Brine & Steam
Gas Conc'n.
parts per
million by
P = PSIA
weight (ppmw)
as CO2
Combined Brine
& Steam Flow
T = oF
S-1
S1.1
STEAM PRESSURE
AND TEMPERATURE
Flash
Condition
s
Gas
Content
F, PSIA
ppmv
T
P
334
114
49,900
ALTERNATIVE A
3-stage turbocompressor
ALTERNATIVE B
reboiler
2,291,000
T
P
550
1,177
48,800
T
P
334
114
49,900
2,289,000
T
P
550
1,177
48,800
T
P
334
114
49,900
S1.3
ALTERNATIVE C
biphase eductor
2,291,000
T
P
550
1,177
48,800
T
P
334
114
49,900
S1.4
ALTERNATIVE D
2,291,000
T
550
48,800
T
334
49,900
hybrid turboP
1,177
P
114
compressor
PLACE HOLDER
PLACE HOLDER
SENSITIVITY CASE GROUP S - 2
LOW STEAM JET EJECTOR EFFIC
LOW TEMPERATURE / LOW GAS CONTENT
BASE CASE
5,418,000
T
350
6,500
T
235
10,100
2-stage ejectors
P
137
P
23
S1.2
S-2
S2.1
ALTERNATIVE A
3-stage turbocompressor
ALTERNATIVE B
reboiler
5,418,000
T
P
350
137
6,500
T
P
235
23
10,100
5,418,000
T
P
350
137
6,500
T
P
235
23
10,100
S2.3
ALTERNATIVE C
biphase eductor
5,418,000
T
P
350
137
6,500
T
P
235
23
10,100
S2.4
ALTERNATIVE D
hybrid turbocompressor
5,418,000
T
P
350
137
6,500
T
P
235
23
10,100
S2.2
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.3a.300
11:49:51
12/05/2014
Configuration
Combined Brine
& Steam Flow
lbs / hour (at
15% steam
quality)
Combined
Brine & Steam
Gas Conc'n.
parts per
million by
P = PSIA
weight (ppmw)
as CO2
T = oF
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
STEAM PRESSURE
AND TEMPERATURE
Flash
Condition
s
Gas
Content
F, PSIA
ppmv
PLACE HOLDER
Page 4.3a.301
11:49:52
12/05/2014
Configuration
Combined
Brine & Steam
Gas Conc'n.
parts per
million by
P = PSIA
weight (ppmw)
as CO2
Combined Brine
& Steam Flow
T = oF
S-3
S3.1
STEAM PRESSURE
AND TEMPERATURE
Flash
Condition
s
Gas
Content
F, PSIA
ppmv
T
P
344
128
30,400
ALTERNATIVE A
3-stage turbocompressor
ALTERNATIVE B
reboiler
2,505,000
T
P
550
1,124
28,900
T
P
344
128
30,400
2,505,000
T
P
550
1,124
28,900
T
P
344
128
30,400
S3.3
ALTERNATIVE C
biphase eductor
2,505,000
T
P
550
1,124
28,900
T
P
344
128
30,400
S3.4
ALTERNATIVE D
hybrid turbocompressor
PLACE HOLDER
2,505,000
T
P
550
1,124
28,900
T
P
344
128
30,400
S3.2
S-4
S4.1
PLACE HOLDER
T
P
244
27
10,100
ALTERNATIVE A
3-stage turbocompressor
ALTERNATIVE B
reboiler
6,251,000
T
P
350
137
6,400
T
P
244
27
10,100
6,250,000
T
P
350
137
6,400
T
P
244
27
10,100
S4.3
ALTERNATIVE C
biphase eductor
6,251,000
T
P
350
137
6,400
T
P
244
27
10,100
S4.4
ALTERNATIVE D
hybrid turbocompressor
6,251,000
T
P
350
137
6,400
T
P
244
27
10,100
S4.2
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.3a.302
11:49:52
12/05/2014
----
s in parasitic power losses. Evaluate the credits by calculating the equivalent electrical generating output of the steam and electricity used t
systems. Assign the "found" generating power a unit value (see worksheet tab 2.2 -- "Bases&Input").
investing in conversion to an alternative gas removal system. See worksheet 4.3b, Present Values, for the detailed calculation of net pres
s. Input defining the financial variables is made in worksheet 2.2, Bases&Input.
UNIT
TOTAL FLOW CAPACIT ELECTRICITY
Y
(A)
COSTS OF DESIGN
ALTERNATIVES
(B)
Percent
of gross
B= 1-(A)
"Unit
Capacity"
Steam +
Gases
Gross
Generator
Output
lbs / hour
Megawatts Megawatts
CAPITAL
(installed)
ANNUAL O & M
$ / year
968,000
50.0
38.2
23.7%
76.3%
968,000
50.0
40.5
19.1%
80.9%
50.0
38.6
22.9%
= clean steam turbine feed
968,000
750,000
N/A
86,900
4,800,000
240,000
77.1%
5,177,000
259,000
968,000
50.0
39.0
21.9%
78.1%
2,228,000
111,000
968,000
50.0
39.9
20.2%
79.8%
1,200,000
60,000
932,000
50.0
41.7
16.6%
83.4%
N/A
62,500
932,000
50.0
43.3
13.5%
86.5%
2,400,000
120,000
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.3a.303
11:49:52
12/05/2014
UNIT
TOTAL FLOW CAPACIT ELECTRICITY
Y
(A)
COSTS OF DESIGN
ALTERNATIVES
(B)
Percent
of gross
B= 1-(A)
"Unit
Capacity"
Steam +
Gases
Gross
Generator
Output
lbs / hour
Megawatts Megawatts
CAPITAL
(installed)
ANNUAL O & M
$ / year
932,000
803,000
50.0
41.9
16.2%
= clean steam turbine feed
83.8%
5,394,000
270,000
932,000
50.0
43.0
14.0%
86.0%
2,262,000
113,000
932,000
50.0
42.9
14.2%
85.8%
600,000
30,000
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.3a.304
11:49:52
12/05/2014
UNIT
TOTAL FLOW CAPACIT ELECTRICITY
Y
(A)
COSTS OF DESIGN
ALTERNATIVES
(B)
Percent
of gross
B= 1-(A)
"Unit
Capacity"
Steam +
Gases
Gross
Generator
Output
lbs / hour
Megawatts Megawatts
CAPITAL
(installed)
ANNUAL O & M
$ / year
896,000
50.0
45.4
9.2%
90.8%
896,000
50.0
46.0
7.9%
92.1%
50.0
45.4
9.2%
= clean steam turbine feed
896,000
853,000
N/A
31,600
1,740,000
87,000
90.8%
5,593,000
280,000
896,000
50.0
46.5
7.0%
93.0%
2,119,000
106,000
896,000
50.0
45.9
8.1%
91.9%
300,000
15,000
1,446,000
50.0
40.6
18.8%
81.2%
N/A
42,200
1,446,000
50.0
43.2
13.5%
86.5%
2,040,000
102,000
50.0
43.3
13.3%
= clean steam turbine feed
86.7%
7,812,000
391,000
1,446,000
1,375,000
1,446,000
50.0
41.3
17.4%
82.6%
4,313,000
216,000
1,446,000
50.0
42.7
14.6%
85.4%
600,000
30,000
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
PLACE HOLDER
Page 4.3a.305
11:49:52
12/05/2014
UNIT
TOTAL FLOW CAPACIT ELECTRICITY
Y
(A)
COSTS OF DESIGN
ALTERNATIVES
(B)
Percent
of gross
B= 1-(A)
"Unit
Capacity"
Steam +
Gases
Gross
Generator
Output
lbs / hour
Megawatts Megawatts
CAPITAL
(installed)
ANNUAL O & M
$ / year
1,505,000
50.0
31.7
36.6%
63.4%
1,505,000
50.0
38.8
22.5%
77.5%
50.0
39.9
20.3%
= clean steam turbine feed
1,505,000
1,291,000
N/A
83,700
4,800,000
240,000
79.7%
7,522,000
376,000
1,505,000
50.0
32.8
34.4%
65.6%
4,259,000
213,000
1,505,000
50.0
36.8
26.3%
73.7%
1,200,000
60,000
PLACE HOLDER
PLACE HOLDER
1,563,000
50.0
24.8
50.4%
49.6%
1,563,000
50.0
34.2
31.5%
68.5%
50.0
36.6
26.8%
= clean steam turbine feed
1,563,000
1,203,000
N/A
116,200
9,600,000
480,000
73.2%
7,210,000
361,000
1,563,000
50.0
25.9
48.3%
51.7%
4,200,000
210,000
1,563,000
50.0
31.1
37.8%
62.2%
2,400,000
120,000
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.3a.306
11:49:52
12/05/2014
UNIT
TOTAL FLOW CAPACIT ELECTRICITY
Y
Steam +
Gases
Gross
Generator
Output
lbs / hour
Megawatts Megawatts
(A)
COSTS OF DESIGN
ALTERNATIVES
(B)
Percent
of gross
B= 1-(A)
"Unit
Capacity"
%
CAPITAL
(installed)
ANNUAL O & M
$ / year
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
PLACE HOLDER
Page 4.3a.307
11:49:52
12/05/2014
UNIT
TOTAL FLOW CAPACIT ELECTRICITY
Y
(A)
COSTS OF DESIGN
ALTERNATIVES
(B)
Percent
of gross
B= 1-(A)
"Unit
Capacity"
Steam +
Gases
Gross
Generator
Output
lbs / hour
Megawatts Megawatts
CAPITAL
(installed)
ANNUAL O & M
$ / year
1,873,000
49.9
5.5
89.0%
11.0%
1,873,000
49.9
11.2
77.5%
22.5%
49.9
23.6
52.7%
= clean steam turbine feed
47.3%
1,873,000
751,000
N/A
249,200
34,680,000
1,734,000
5,434,000
272,000
1,873,000
49.9
7.1
85.7%
14.3%
3,877,000
194,000
1,873,000
49.9
8.7
82.5%
17.5%
8,400,000
420,000
PLACE HOLDER
PLACE HOLDER
1,062,000
50.0
30.6
38.8%
61.2%
1,062,000
50.0
33.4
33.2%
66.8%
50.0
31.0
37.9%
= clean steam turbine feed
62.1%
1,062,000
614,000
N/A
139,100
12,360,000
618,000
4,592,000
230,000
1,062,000
50.0
29.8
40.3%
59.7%
2,137,000
107,000
1,062,000
50.0
32.7
34.5%
65.5%
3,000,000
150,000
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.3a.308
11:49:52
12/05/2014
UNIT
TOTAL FLOW CAPACIT ELECTRICITY
Y
Steam +
Gases
Gross
Generator
Output
lbs / hour
Megawatts Megawatts
(A)
COSTS OF DESIGN
ALTERNATIVES
(B)
Percent
of gross
B= 1-(A)
"Unit
Capacity"
%
CAPITAL
(installed)
ANNUAL O & M
$ / year
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
PLACE HOLDER
Page 4.3a.309
11:49:52
12/05/2014
UNIT
TOTAL FLOW CAPACIT ELECTRICITY
Y
(A)
COSTS OF DESIGN
ALTERNATIVES
(B)
Percent
of gross
B= 1-(A)
"Unit
Capacity"
Steam +
Gases
Gross
Generator
Output
lbs / hour
Megawatts Megawatts
CAPITAL
(installed)
ANNUAL O & M
$ / year
50.0
34.2
31.5%
68.5%
968,000
50.0
40.5
19.0%
81.0%
50.0
38.6
22.9%
= clean steam turbine feed
968,000
750,000
N/A
86,900
4,800,000
240,000
77.1%
5,177,000
259,000
968,000
50.0
35.8
28.5%
71.5%
2,228,000
111,000
968,000
50.0
37.2
25.6%
74.4%
1,200,000
60,000
PLACE HOLDER
W STEAM JET EJECTOR EFFICIENCY
PLACE HOLDER
1,446,000
50.0
38.7
22.6%
77.4%
1,446,000
50.0
43.2
13.5%
86.5%
50.0
43.3
13.3%
= clean steam turbine feed
1,446,000
1,375,000
N/A
42,400
2,040,000
102,000
86.7%
7,812,000
391,000
1,446,000
50.0
39.9
20.3%
79.7%
4,313,000
216,000
1,446,000
50.0
41.6
16.7%
83.3%
600,000
30,000
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.3a.310
11:49:52
12/05/2014
UNIT
TOTAL FLOW CAPACIT ELECTRICITY
Y
Steam +
Gases
Gross
Generator
Output
lbs / hour
Megawatts Megawatts
(A)
COSTS OF DESIGN
ALTERNATIVES
(B)
Percent
of gross
B= 1-(A)
"Unit
Capacity"
%
CAPITAL
(installed)
ANNUAL O & M
$ / year
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
PLACE HOLDER
Page 4.3a.311
11:49:52
12/05/2014
UNIT
TOTAL FLOW CAPACIT ELECTRICITY
Y
(A)
COSTS OF DESIGN
ALTERNATIVES
(B)
Percent
of gross
B= 1-(A)
"Unit
Capacity"
Steam +
Gases
Gross
Generator
Output
lbs / hour
Megawatts Megawatts
CAPITAL
(installed)
ANNUAL O & M
$ / year
50.0
42.2
15.6%
84.4%
1,001,000
50.0
43.4
13.3%
86.7%
50.0
41.7
16.7%
= clean steam turbine feed
1,001,000
860,000
N/A
65,900
3,120,000
156,000
83.3%
5,620,000
281,000
1,001,000
50.0
43.5
13.0%
87.0%
2,407,000
120,000
1,001,000
50.0
43.1
13.8%
86.2%
600,000
30,000
PLACE HOLDER
PLACE HOLDER
1,615,000
50.0
41.0
18.0%
82.0%
1,615,000
50.0
42.8
14.4%
85.6%
50.0
42.8
14.4%
= clean steam turbine feed
1,615,000
1,536,000
N/A
45,300
2,400,000
120,000
85.6%
8,348,000
417,000
1,615,000
50.0
41.5
16.9%
83.1%
4,732,000
237,000
1,615,000
50.0
42.4
15.1%
84.9%
600,000
30,000
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.3a.312
11:49:52
12/05/2014
VALUES
ctrical generating output of the steam and electricity used to run the
2 -- "Bases&Input").
4.3b, Present Values, for the detailed calculation of net present value
VALUE OF UNEXPENDED
PARASITIC POWER AS A
SALABLE PRODUCT
ECONOMIC
FIGURE OF
MERIT
Net Unexpended
Power Available
for Sale
Sales value of
unexpended
power
NET PRESENT
VALUE
Kilowatt-hours per
year
$ / year
NPV at end of
term
See
Worksheet
4.3b
"Present
Values"
N/A
18,050,000
722,000
(1,540,000)
3,020,000
120,800
(4,590,000)
6,890,000
275,600
(980,000)
13,660,000
546,400
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
504,000
Page 4.3a.313
1,250,000
N/A
$
(130,000)
11:49:52
12/05/2014
VALUE OF UNEXPENDED
PARASITIC POWER AS A
SALABLE PRODUCT
ECONOMIC
FIGURE OF
MERIT
Net Unexpended
Power Available
for Sale
Sales value of
unexpended
power
NET PRESENT
VALUE
Kilowatt-hours per
year
$ / year
NPV at end of
term
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
See
Worksheet
4.3b
"Present
Values"
1,700,000
68,000
(5,040,000)
10,300,000
412,000
(400,000)
9,500,000
380,000
Page 4.3a.314
1,100,000
11:49:52
12/05/2014
VALUE OF UNEXPENDED
PARASITIC POWER AS A
SALABLE PRODUCT
ECONOMIC
FIGURE OF
MERIT
Net Unexpended
Power Available
for Sale
Sales value of
unexpended
power
NET PRESENT
VALUE
Kilowatt-hours per
year
$ / year
NPV at end of
term
See
Worksheet
4.3b
"Present
Values"
N/A
5,200,000
208,000
(800,000)
200,000
8,000
(5,510,000)
8,700,000
348,000
(550,000)
4,500,000
180,000
510,000
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
N/A
20,800,000
832,000
1,690,000
21,500,000
860,000
(3,910,000)
5,600,000
224,000
(3,280,000)
16,500,000
660,000
2,350,000
PLACE HOLDER
Page 4.3a.315
11:49:52
12/05/2014
VALUE OF UNEXPENDED
PARASITIC POWER AS A
SALABLE PRODUCT
ECONOMIC
FIGURE OF
MERIT
Net Unexpended
Power Available
for Sale
Sales value of
unexpended
power
NET PRESENT
VALUE
Kilowatt-hours per
year
$ / year
NPV at end of
term
See
Worksheet
4.3b
"Present
Values"
N/A
55,700,000
2,228,000
5,180,000
64,200,000
2,568,000
4,000,000
8,600,000
344,000
(2,690,000)
40,500,000
1,620,000
6,040,000
PLACE HOLDER
PLACE HOLDER
MAIN CASE GROUP 6
N/A
N/A
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
N/A
74,300,000
2,972,000
3,740,000
93,000,000
3,720,000
9,440,000
8,400,000
336,000
(2,660,000)
49,800,000
1,992,000
6,510,000
Page 4.3a.316
11:49:52
12/05/2014
VALUE OF UNEXPENDED
PARASITIC POWER AS A
SALABLE PRODUCT
Net Unexpended
Power Available
for Sale
Sales value of
unexpended
power
NET PRESENT
VALUE
Kilowatt-hours per
year
$ / year
NPV at end of
term
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
ECONOMIC
FIGURE OF
MERIT
Page 4.3a.317
See
Worksheet
4.3b
"Present
Values"
11:49:52
12/05/2014
VALUE OF UNEXPENDED
PARASITIC POWER AS A
SALABLE PRODUCT
ECONOMIC
FIGURE OF
MERIT
Net Unexpended
Power Available
for Sale
Sales value of
unexpended
power
NET PRESENT
VALUE
Kilowatt-hours per
year
$ / year
NPV at end of
term
See
Worksheet
4.3b
"Present
Values"
N/A
45,200,000
1,808,000
$ (26,300,000)
142,700,000
5,708,000
20,070,000
12,800,000
512,000
(1,560,000)
25,400,000
1,016,000
(3,790,000)
PLACE HOLDER
PLACE HOLDER
MAIN CASE GROUP 8
N/A
N/A
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
N/A
22,100,000
884,000
(8,310,000)
3,600,000
144,000
(3,910,000)
-5,800,000
(232,000) $
(3,150,000)
17,000,000
680,000
Page 4.3a.318
60,000
11:49:52
12/05/2014
VALUE OF UNEXPENDED
PARASITIC POWER AS A
SALABLE PRODUCT
Net Unexpended
Power Available
for Sale
Sales value of
unexpended
power
NET PRESENT
VALUE
Kilowatt-hours per
year
$ / year
NPV at end of
term
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
ECONOMIC
FIGURE OF
MERIT
Page 4.3a.319
See
Worksheet
4.3b
"Present
Values"
11:49:52
12/05/2014
VALUE OF UNEXPENDED
PARASITIC POWER AS A
SALABLE PRODUCT
Net Unexpended
Power Available
for Sale
Sales value of
unexpended
power
NET PRESENT
VALUE
Kilowatt-hours per
year
$ / year
NPV at end of
term
PLACE HOLDER
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
ECONOMIC
FIGURE OF
MERIT
See
Worksheet
4.3b
"Present
Values"
49,300,000
1,972,000
N/A
PAYBACK
PERIODS
2.6
34,000,000
1,360,000
4.4
11,900,000
476,000
6.1
23,500,000
940,000
1.2
PLACE HOLDER
LOW EJECTOR EFFICIENCY
SENSITIVITY CASE GROUP S - 2
N/A
N/A
35,600,000
1,424,000
N/A
PAYBACK
PERIODS
1.5
36,400,000
1,456,000
7.1
9,100,000
364,000
29.1
23,000,000
920,000
0.6
Page 4.3a.320
11:49:52
12/05/2014
VALUE OF UNEXPENDED
PARASITIC POWER AS A
SALABLE PRODUCT
Net Unexpended
Power Available
for Sale
Sales value of
unexpended
power
NET PRESENT
VALUE
Kilowatt-hours per
year
$ / year
NPV at end of
term
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
ECONOMIC
FIGURE OF
MERIT
Page 4.3a.321
See
Worksheet
4.3b
"Present
Values"
11:49:52
12/05/2014
VALUE OF UNEXPENDED
PARASITIC POWER AS A
SALABLE PRODUCT
ECONOMIC
FIGURE OF
MERIT
Net Unexpended
Power Available
for Sale
Sales value of
unexpended
power
NET PRESENT
VALUE
Kilowatt-hours per
year
$ / year
NPV at end of
term
See
Worksheet
4.3b
"Present
Values"
9,200,000
368,000
N/A
PAYBACK
PERIODS
11.2
-4,500,000
(180,000)
-14.2
10,100,000
404,000
8.5
7,000,000
280,000
1.9
PLACE HOLDER
PLACE HOLDER
80 F WET BULB TEMPERATURE
SENSITIVITY CASE GROUP S - 4
N/A
N/A
o
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
14,400,000
576,000
N/A
PAYBACK
PERIODS
4.8
14,100,000
564,000
43.4
4,400,000
176,000
-77.6
11,300,000
452,000
1.3
Page 4.3a.322
11:49:52
12/05/2014
This worksheet calculates the present worth values of the gas removal system alternatives, using the performance data calcu
the controlling bases for these calculations are entered in worksheet 2.2, Bases&Input. These calculations use constant-doll
discount) rates for general market inflation. This adjusts the future years' net revenue values for the assigned capital discoun
rate for the contract price of electricity, which is realistic in today's markets. The difference between general and price-of-elec
Based on guidelines listed in the NREL publication, "A Manual for the Economic Evaluation of Energy Efficiency and Renewa
accommodates:
-
user-selected values of annual capital discount rate, general inflation rate, standalone inflation rates on electricity prices, an
taxes as a percent of net revenue after expenses are deducted.
cash flow analysis terms up to 15 years.
depreciation terms up to 12 years.
only straight-line depreciation.
The following operating cost variables can be assigned discretely for each gas removal technology:
- variable "O&M" costs as a percent of fixed capital costs for the alternative gas removal systems.
- variable pre-tax expenses for salvage value and other general expenses as percents of capital costs or revenues.
- pre-tax labor charges (which would usually be applied in lieu of a labor component in O&M charges).
The net present value of each gas removal option is calculated by balancing the values of installation capital costs and variou
calculations are based on each technology's specific performance at the plant conditions cited in worksheet 4.1, "Ops Details
gas removal option achieves compared to the Base Case plant configuration (in the original spreadsheet format the Base Ca
that configuration). These revenues must pay for the installation and operating costs -- if not, the NPV results remain negat
The user can substitute different values of the controlling financial variables shown in Worksheet 2.2 (Bases&Input), such tha
market circumstances. This methodology is general but realistic in its form, and the uniform application of the method gives a
As the calculations below are configured at delivery to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, the economics account fo
to one of the alternatives. The conversion is based on supporting a defined power plant capacity of 50 Megawatts. This wor
construction options in lieu of steam jets. This may be done by reducing the capital costs of the alternatives by the cost of
capacity.
NOTE : DEFINING VALUES OF THESE DATA ARE SET IN WORKSHEET 2.2, "INPUT&B
Valuation Periods : Analysis Term =
10
years (15 max.)
Depreciation Term =
Annual Rates :
2.00%
Nominal Discount Rate = 10.00% en.Inflation Rate =
7.84% To correct Depreciation apply: 1 + Inflation =
Real Discount Rate (Nom. Discount Rate / Gen. Inflation Rate) =
1.0784 lvage Values = (see sheet 2.2 -- specific to
For NPV factors apply (1+Real Discount Rate) =
Electricity Price Inflation :
2.0%
Electricity Price Inflation Compensation :
AXG-9-20432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.3b.323
11:49:52
12/05/2014
ONE - TIME
COST
YEAR 0
CONSTANT-DOLLAR VALUES
Labor
General
Installation
Labor
Revenues
O & M Costs Allocatio
Expense
Capital Costs
Costs
Net Costs
n
s
Equivale
Before
nt
Depreciation
$/
$ / year
$ / year
Personn
$ / year
year
el per
System
Estimated
value of saved % of fixed
% of
Fixed Price
energy
capital
revenues
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
=b+c+d
income
cost
cost
cost
cost
worksheet 2.
MAIN CASE GROUP 1
HIGH TEMPERATURE/PRESSURE AND HIGH GAS CONTENT
B1.1 ALTERNATIVE A
3-stage turbocompressor
B1.2 ALTERNATIVE B
reboiler
$ 4,800,000
722,000
240,000
$ -
$ 240,000
$ 5,177,000
120,800
259,000
$ -
$ 259,000
B1.3 ALTERNATIVE C
biphase eductor
$ 2,228,000
275,600
111,000
$ -
111,000
B1.4 ALTERNATIVE D
hybrid turbocompressor
$ 1,200,000
546,400
60,000
$ -
60,000
B2.1 ALTERNATIVE A
3-stage turbocompressor
B2.2 ALTERNATIVE B
reboiler
$ 2,400,000
504,000
120,000
$ -
$ 120,000
$ 5,394,000
68,000
270,000
$ -
$ 270,000
B2.3 ALTERNATIVE C
biphase eductor
$ 2,262,000
412,000
113,000
$ -
$ 113,000
B2.4 ALTERNATIVE D
hybrid turbocompressor
380,000
30,000
$ -
AXG-9-20432-01
253838234.xls
600,000
Page 4.3b.324
30,000
11:49:52
12/05/2014
ONE - TIME
COST
YEAR 0
CONSTANT-DOLLAR VALUES
Labor
General
Installation
Labor
Revenues
O & M Costs Allocatio
Expense
Capital Costs
Costs
Net Costs
n
s
Equivale
Before
nt
Depreciation
$/
$ / year
$ / year
Personn
$ / year
year
el per
System
Estimated
value of saved % of fixed
% of
Fixed Price
energy
capital
revenues
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
=b+c+d
income
cost
cost
cost
cost
worksheet 2.
MAIN CASE GROUP 3
HIGH TEMPERATURE/PRESSURE AND LOW GAS CONTENT
B3.1 ALTERNATIVE A
3-stage turbocompressor
B3.2 ALTERNATIVE B
reboiler
$ 1,740,000
208,000
87,000
$ -
$ 5,593,000
8,000
280,000
$ -
$ 280,000
B3.3 ALTERNATIVE C
biphase eductor
$ 2,119,000
348,000
106,000
$ -
$ 106,000
B3.4 ALTERNATIVE D
hybrid turbocompressor
180,000
15,000
$ -
300,000
87,000
15,000
B4.1 ALTERNATIVE A
3-stage turbocompressor
B4.2 ALTERNATIVE B
reboiler
$ 2,040,000
832,000
102,000
$ -
$ 102,000
$ 7,812,000
860,000
391,000
$ -
$ 391,000
B4.3 ALTERNATIVE C
biphase eductor
$ 4,313,000
224,000
216,000
$ -
$ 216,000
B4.4 ALTERNATIVE D
hybrid turbocompressor
660,000
30,000
$ -
AXG-9-20432-01
253838234.xls
600,000
Page 4.3b.325
30,000
11:49:52
12/05/2014
ONE - TIME
COST
YEAR 0
CONSTANT-DOLLAR VALUES
Labor
General
Installation
Labor
Revenues
O & M Costs Allocatio
Expense
Capital Costs
Costs
Net Costs
n
s
Equivale
Before
nt
Depreciation
$/
$ / year
$ / year
Personn
$ / year
year
el per
System
Estimated
value of saved % of fixed
% of
Fixed Price
energy
capital
revenues
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
=b+c+d
income
cost
cost
cost
cost
worksheet 2.
MAIN CASE GROUP 5
LOW TEMPERATURE/PRESSURE AND MID GAS CONTENT
B5.1 ALTERNATIVE A
3-stage turbocompressor
B5.2 ALTERNATIVE B
reboiler
$ 4,800,000
2,228,000
240,000
$ -
$ 240,000
$ 7,522,000
2,568,000
376,000
$ -
$ 376,000
B5.3 ALTERNATIVE C
biphase eductor
$ 4,259,000
344,000
213,000
$ -
$ 213,000
B5.4 ALTERNATIVE D
hybrid turbocompressor
$ 1,200,000
1,620,000
60,000
$ -
60,000
B6.1 ALTERNATIVE A
3-stage turbocompressor
B6.2 ALTERNATIVE B
reboiler
$ 9,600,000
2,972,000
480,000
$ -
$ 480,000
$ 7,210,000
3,720,000
361,000
$ -
$ 361,000
B6.3 ALTERNATIVE C
biphase eductor
$ 4,200,000
336,000
210,000
$ -
$ 210,000
B6.4 ALTERNATIVE D
hybrid turbocompressor
$ 2,400,000
1,992,000
120,000
$ -
$ 120,000
AXG-9-20432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.3b.326
11:49:52
12/05/2014
ONE - TIME
COST
YEAR 0
CONSTANT-DOLLAR VALUES
Labor
General
Installation
Labor
Revenues
O & M Costs Allocatio
Expense
Capital Costs
Costs
Net Costs
n
s
Equivale
Before
nt
Depreciation
$/
$ / year
$ / year
Personn
$ / year
year
el per
System
Estimated
value of saved % of fixed
% of
Fixed Price
energy
capital
revenues
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
=b+c+d
income
cost
cost
cost
cost
worksheet 2.
MAIN CASE GROUP 7
LOW TEMPERATURE/PRESSURE AND VERY HIGH GAS CONTENT
B7.1 ALTERNATIVE A
3-stage turbocompressor
B7.2 ALTERNATIVE B
reboiler
$ 34,680,000
1,808,000
$ 1,734,000
$ -
$1,734,000
$ 5,434,000
5,708,000
272,000
$ -
$ 272,000
B7.3 ALTERNATIVE C
biphase eductor
$ 3,877,000
512,000
194,000
$ -
$ 194,000
B7.4 ALTERNATIVE D
hybrid turbocompressor
$ 8,400,000
1,016,000
420,000
$ -
$ 420,000
B8.1 ALTERNATIVE A
3-stage turbocompressor
B8.2 ALTERNATIVE B
reboiler
$ 12,360,000
884,000
618,000
$ -
$ 618,000
$ 4,592,000
144,000
230,000
$ -
$ 230,000
B8.3 ALTERNATIVE C
biphase eductor
$ 2,137,000
(232,000) $
107,000
$ -
$ 107,000
B8.4 ALTERNATIVE D
hybrid turbocompressor
$ 3,000,000
150,000
$ -
$ 150,000
AXG-9-20432-01
253838234.xls
680,000
Page 4.3b.327
11:49:52
12/05/2014
NOTES
rformance data calculated in the engineering and economic figure of merit worksheets. The values of
ns use constant-dollar values, correcting the depreciation values and nominal interest (capital
gned capital discount rate. This spreadsheet allows the user to specify a separate inflation (deflation)
eral and price-of-electricity inflation rates is compensated in the net present value (NPV) calculations.
1. The
for the
gives th
iciency and Renewable Energy Technologies," (Short, Packey, Holt, 1995), this evaluation
2. The
3. The
4. The
current
5. The
6. The
genera
7. The
r revenues.
8, The
pital costs and various operating costs versus the revenues attributable to that option. These
eet 4.1, "Ops Details." The revenues for each option result from the energy savings (or deficit) that a
format the Base Case configuration is a two-stage steam jet ejector system -- the use can change
results remain negative indefinitely.
9. The
Annua
before
ses&Input), such that the economic analyses can approximate a wide range of world electrical power
of the method gives a good comparison of the relative economic merits of the gas removal alternatives.
Curren
The An
and De
conomics account for retrofit conversions from a conventional steam jet ejector gas removal systems
Megawatts. This worksheet can be modified easily to evaluate the alternative technologies as original
atives by the cost of installation of a steam jet ejector configuration for the defined power plant
34%
1.00
AXG-9-20432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.3b.328
11:49:52
12/05/2014
Analysis
Switch
0
1 = on
0 = off
current dollar
Depreciation 1 = on
values
Switch
0 = off
$ / year
FLOW
RESULTS
0.7973
0.7393
0.9423
1.0000
0.9238
1.0000
Fixed price /
Annual NPV Factors (with
0.9273
0.8598
Depr'n Term discount rate & inflation) =
(salvage %
0.9804
0.9612
Depreciation Inflation Factors =
on
worksheet 2.2) Electr. Price Compensation =
1.0000
1.0000
MAIN CASE GROUP 1
HIGH TEMPERATURE/PRESSURE AND HIGH GAS CONTENT
--
(4,800,000) $
(4,800,000) $
606,120 $
(4,237,961) $
600,473 $
(3,721,654) $
TOP R
BOTTOM ROW OF EACH P
594,937 $
589,509
(3,247,310) $
(2,811,477)
(5,177,000) $
(5,177,000) $
219,408 $
(4,973,549) $
213,317 $
(4,790,131) $
207,346 $
(4,624,814) $
201,492
(4,475,847)
(2,228,000) $
(2,228,000) $
242,316 $
(2,003,307) $
239,695 $
(1,797,209) $
237,125 $
(1,608,149) $
234,606
(1,434,701)
(1,200,000) $
(1,200,000) $
393,024 $
(835,560) $
391,612 $
(498,838) $
390,228 $
(187,708) $
388,871
99,790
(2,400,000) $
(2,400,000) $
397,440 $
(2,031,465) $
394,616 $
(1,692,160) $
TOP R
BOTTOM ROW OF EACH P
391,848 $
389,134
(1,379,739) $
(1,092,045)
(5,394,000) $
(5,394,000) $
190,320 $
(5,217,521) $
183,974 $
(5,059,334) $
177,753 $
(4,917,612) $
171,653
(4,790,706)
(2,262,000) $
(2,262,000) $
333,060 $
(1,953,163) $
330,399 $
(1,669,074) $
327,790 $
(1,407,727) $
325,232
(1,167,278)
(600,000) $
(600,000) $
267,000 $
(352,418) $
266,294 $
(123,449) $
AXG-9-20432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.3b.329
265,602
88,316
$
$
264,924
284,178
11:49:52
12/05/2014
Analysis
Switch
0
1 = on
0 = off
current dollar
Depreciation 1 = on
values
Switch
0 = off
$ / year
FLOW
RESULTS
0.7973
0.7393
0.9423
1.0000
0.9238
1.0000
Fixed price /
Annual NPV Factors (with
0.9273
0.8598
Depr'n Term discount rate & inflation) =
(salvage %
0.9804
0.9612
Depreciation Inflation Factors =
on
worksheet 2.2) Electr. Price Compensation =
1.0000
1.0000
MAIN CASE GROUP 3
HIGH TEMPERATURE/PRESSURE AND LOW GAS CONTENT
--
(1,740,000) $
(1,740,000) $
184,260 $
(1,569,141) $
182,213 $
(1,412,468) $
TOP R
BOTTOM ROW OF EACH P
180,206 $
178,238
(1,268,789) $
(1,137,015)
(5,593,000) $
(5,593,000) $
156,060 $
(5,448,290) $
149,480 $
(5,319,762) $
143,029 $
(5,205,725) $
136,705
(5,104,657)
(2,119,000) $
(2,119,000) $
286,860 $
(1,853,003) $
284,367 $
(1,608,494) $
281,923 $
(1,383,716) $
279,527
(1,177,058)
(300,000) $
(300,000) $
126,900 $
(182,329) $
126,547 $
(73,520) $
126,201
27,101
$
$
125,862
120,152
TOP R
BOTTOM ROW OF EACH P
599,447 $
597,140
(484,353) $
(42,878)
(2,040,000) $
(2,040,000) $
604,200 $
(1,479,742) $
601,800 $
(962,293) $
(7,812,000) $
(7,812,000) $
778,260 $
(7,090,341) $
769,069 $
(6,429,068) $
760,059 $
(5,823,072) $
751,225
(5,267,679)
(4,313,000) $
(4,313,000) $
264,060 $
(4,068,144) $
258,986 $
(3,845,459) $
254,011 $
(3,642,936) $
249,134
(3,458,747)
(600,000) $
(600,000) $
451,800 $
(181,058) $
451,094
206,808
450,402
565,914
AXG-9-20432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.3b.330
$
$
$
$
449,724
898,402
11:49:52
12/05/2014
Analysis
Switch
0
1 = on
0 = off
current dollar
Depreciation 1 = on
values
Switch
0 = off
$ / year
RESULTS
0.7973
0.7393
0.9423
1.0000
0.9238
1.0000
Fixed price /
Annual NPV Factors (with
0.9273
0.8598
Depr'n Term discount rate & inflation) =
(salvage %
0.9804
0.9612
Depreciation Inflation Factors =
on
worksheet 2.2) Electr. Price Compensation =
1.0000
1.0000
MAIN CASE GROUP 5
LOW TEMPERATURE/PRESSURE AND MID GAS CONTENT
FLOW
TOP R
BOTTOM ROW OF EACH P
1,588,897 $
1,583,469
(678,511) $
492,172
(4,800,000) $
(4,800,000) $
1,600,080 $
(3,316,289) $
1,594,433 $
(1,945,341) $
(7,522,000) $
(7,522,000) $
1,898,040 $
(5,761,999) $
1,889,191 $
(4,137,608) $
1,880,515 $
(2,638,271) $
1,872,009
(1,254,265)
(4,259,000) $
(4,259,000) $
342,000 $
(3,941,873) $
336,989 $
(3,652,118) $
332,077 $
(3,387,352) $
327,261
(3,145,403)
(1,200,000) $
(1,200,000) $
1,101,600 $
(178,516) $
1,100,188
767,464
$
$
--
1,098,804
1,643,542
$
$
1,097,447
2,454,902
TOP R
BOTTOM ROW OF EACH P
2,198,353 $
2,187,498
(3,888,296) $
(2,271,045)
(9,600,000) $
(9,600,000) $
2,220,720 $
(7,540,787) $
2,209,426 $
(5,641,046) $
(7,210,000) $
(7,210,000) $
2,649,540 $
(4,753,154) $
2,641,058 $
(2,482,281) $
2,632,742 $
(383,193) $
2,624,589
1,557,207
(4,200,000) $
(4,200,000) $
335,160 $
(3,889,215) $
330,219 $
(3,605,282) $
325,375 $
(3,345,860) $
320,625
(3,108,817)
(2,400,000) $
(2,400,000) $
1,379,520 $
(1,120,809) $
AXG-9-20432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.3b.331
1,376,696
62,923
$
$
1,373,928
1,158,357
$
$
1,371,214
2,172,118
11:49:52
12/05/2014
Depreciation
0
1 = on
0 = off
current dollar
Depreciation 1 = on
values
Switch
0 = off
$ / year
RESULTS
0.7973
0.7393
0.9423
1.0000
0.9238
1.0000
Fixed price /
Annual NPV Factors (with
0.9273
0.8598
Depr'n Term discount rate & inflation) =
(salvage %
0.9804
0.9612
Depreciation Inflation Factors =
on
worksheet 2.2) Electr. Price Compensation =
1.0000
1.0000
MAIN CASE GROUP 7
LOW TEMPERATURE/PRESSURE AND VERY HIGH GAS CONTENT
FLOW
(34,680,000) $
(34,680,000) $
2,129,640 $
(32,705,243) $
(5,434,000) $
(5,434,000) $
3,913,800 $
(1,804,840) $
(3,877,000) $
(3,877,000) $
442,500 $
(3,466,682) $
(8,400,000) $
(8,400,000) $
897,360 $
(7,567,903) $
2,088,840 $
(30,909,186) $
3,907,407
1,554,884
$
$
--
TOP R
BOTTOM ROW OF EACH P
2,048,840 $
2,009,624
(29,275,643) $ (27,789,896)
3,901,139
4,665,268
$
$
3,894,995
7,544,899
437,939 $
(3,090,127) $
433,467 $
(2,744,523) $
429,083
(2,427,295)
887,478 $
(6,804,818) $
877,789 $
(6,104,956) $
868,290
(5,463,015)
(12,360,000) $
(12,360,000) $
917,160 $
(11,509,543) $
902,619 $
(10,733,440) $
TOP R
BOTTOM ROW OF EACH P
888,363 $
874,386
(10,025,147) $
(9,378,699)
(4,592,000) $
(4,592,000) $
218,760 $
(4,389,150) $
213,358 $
(4,205,698) $
208,061 $
(4,039,810) $
202,869
(3,889,826)
(2,137,000) $
(2,137,000) $
(95,520) $
(2,225,573) $
(98,034) $
(2,309,866) $
(100,499) $
(2,389,994) $
(102,915)
(2,466,081)
(3,000,000) $
(3,000,000) $
529,800 $
(2,508,731) $
526,271 $
(2,056,225) $
522,810 $
(1,639,388) $
519,418
(1,255,374)
AXG-9-20432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.3b.332
11:49:52
12/05/2014
NOTES:
1. The "Analysis Term" is the total time period for which NPV calculations are requested, to a maximum duration of 15 years.
for the end of the specified term. The user may examine successive years' results graphically by changing the analysis term
gives the NPV history for all years.
2. The "Depreciation Term" is the period over which depreciation is deducted for tax purposes. Only straight-line depreciatio
3. The "Nominal Discount Rate" is the target time-value-of-money compounding rate required for return on investment by a p
4. The "General Inflation Rate" is a general economic term for costs of labor, supplies, materials, etc. This inflation rate is al
current-year value) to cancel the application of inflation in the NPV factors (see 5, following).
5. The "Real Discount Rate" is the effective rate of compounding of net revenues after compensating for inflation. This ratio
6. The price of electricity is assigned a separate inflation rate. The "Electricity Price Inflation Compensation" factor compens
general inflation factor built into the NPV factors.
7. The tax rate is the overall value of taxation on net revenues, including the deduction for depreciation.
8, The Recurring Annual Costs below are referred from other worksheets and calculated as listed.
9. The general formulae for the net annual revenues and the cumulative net present values of revenues and costs are as foll
Annual Net Revenues = (electricity revenue) * (price inflation factor) - (net costs before depreciation) - (tax rate) * [ (ele
before depreciation) - (depreciation) * (depreciation factor) ]
Current-Year Cumulative NPV = (prior year cumulative NPV) + (current-year Annual Net Revenues) * (NPV factor based
The Analysis Switch and the Depreciation Switch activate the calculation of annual net revenues and of depreciation, respect
and Depreciation Term values. The Cumulative NPV remains constant in all years after the last year of the Analysis Term.
AXG-9-20432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.3b.333
11:49:52
12/05/2014
LOW
--
CONSTANT-DOLLAR
ANNUAL
AND
DISCOUNTED
CUMULATIVE
NET
PRESENT
10
0.6855
0.6357
0.5895
0.5466
0.5068
0.4700
0.9057
1.0000
0.0000
1.0000
0.0000
1.0000
0.0000
1.0000
0.0000
1.0000
VALUES
0.0000
1.0000
MAIN CASE GROUP 1
HIGH TEMPERATURE/PRESSURE AND HIG
TOP ROW OF EACH PAIR : CONSTANT-DOLLAR ANNUAL NET REVENUES AFTER TAXES
M ROW OF EACH PAIR : CUMULATIVE NET PRESENT VALUE OF CASH FLOWS THROUGH LAST YEAR OF ANALYSIS T
$
584,187 $
318,120 $
318,120 $
318,120 $
318,120 $
318,120
$
(2,410,989) $
(2,208,763) $ (2,021,245) $ (1,847,365) $ (1,686,130) $ (1,536,622)
$
$
195,753 $
(4,341,650) $
(91,212) $
(4,399,632) $
(91,212) $
(4,453,398) $
(91,212) $
(4,503,253) $
(91,212) $
(4,549,483) $
(91,212)
(4,592,350)
$
$
232,136 $
(1,275,561) $
108,636 $
(1,206,503) $
108,636 $
(1,142,466) $
108,636 $
(1,083,087) $
108,636 $
(1,028,027) $
108,636
(976,970)
$
$
387,541
365,468
321,024
569,539
321,024
758,769
321,024
934,237
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
321,024
1,096,944
$
$
321,024
1,247,817
TOP ROW OF EACH PAIR : CONSTANT-DOLLAR ANNUAL NET REVENUES AFTER TAXES
M ROW OF EACH PAIR : CUMULATIVE NET PRESENT VALUE OF CASH FLOWS THROUGH LAST YEAR OF ANALYSIS T
$
386,474 $
253,440 $
253,440 $
253,440 $
253,440 $
253,440
$
(827,099) $
(665,990) $
(516,598) $
(378,071) $
(249,619) $
(130,508)
$
$
165,673 $
(4,677,129) $
(133,320) $
(4,761,879) $
(133,320) $
(4,840,465) $
(133,320) $
(4,913,337) $
(133,320) $
(4,980,908) $
(133,320)
(5,043,565)
$
$
322,724 $
(946,035) $
197,340 $
(820,588) $
197,340 $
(704,265) $
197,340 $
(596,401) $
197,340 $
(496,382) $
197,340
(403,637)
$
$
264,258
465,339
AXG-9-20432-01
253838234.xls
$
$
231,000
612,184
$
$
231,000
748,348
$
$
Page 4.3b.334
231,000
874,610
$
$
231,000
991,689
$
$
231,000
1,100,253
11:49:52
12/05/2014
LOW
--
CONSTANT-DOLLAR
ANNUAL
AND
DISCOUNTED
CUMULATIVE
NET
PRESENT
10
0.6855
0.6357
0.5895
0.5466
0.5068
0.4700
0.9057
1.0000
0.0000
1.0000
0.0000
1.0000
0.0000
1.0000
0.0000
1.0000
VALUES
0.0000
1.0000
MAIN CASE GROUP 3
HIGH TEMPERATURE/PRESSURE AND LOW
TOP ROW OF EACH PAIR : CONSTANT-DOLLAR ANNUAL NET REVENUES AFTER TAXES
M ROW OF EACH PAIR : CUMULATIVE NET PRESENT VALUE OF CASH FLOWS THROUGH LAST YEAR OF ANALYSIS T
$
176,309 $
79,860 $
79,860 $
79,860 $
79,860 $
79,860
$
(1,016,146) $
(965,380) $
(918,306) $
(874,656) $
(834,180) $
(796,647)
$
$
130,504 $
(5,015,190) $
(179,520) $
(5,129,309) $
(179,520) $
(5,235,128) $
(179,520) $
(5,333,252) $
(179,520) $
(5,424,239) $
(179,520)
(5,508,609)
$
$
277,178 $
(987,039) $
159,720 $
(885,507) $
159,720 $
(791,359) $
159,720 $
(704,058) $
159,720 $
(623,106) $
159,720
(548,042)
$
$
125,529
206,209
$
$
108,900
275,435
$
$
108,900
339,627
$
$
108,900
399,150
$
$
108,900
454,345
$
$
108,900
505,525
TOP ROW OF EACH PAIR : CONSTANT-DOLLAR ANNUAL NET REVENUES AFTER TAXES
M ROW OF EACH PAIR : CUMULATIVE NET PRESENT VALUE OF CASH FLOWS THROUGH LAST YEAR OF ANALYSIS T
$
594,879 $
481,800 $
481,800 $
481,800 $
481,800 $
481,800
$
364,939 $
671,214 $
955,215 $
1,218,561 $
1,462,754 $
1,689,188
$
$
742,565 $
(4,758,616) $
309,540 $
(4,561,845) $
309,540 $
(4,379,384) $
309,540 $
(4,210,193) $
309,540 $
(4,053,307) $
309,540
(3,907,831)
$
$
244,353 $
(3,291,232) $
5,280 $
(3,287,875) $
5,280 $
(3,284,763) $
5,280 $
(3,281,877) $
5,280 $
(3,279,201) $
5,280
(3,276,719)
$
$
449,058
1,206,253
AXG-9-20432-01
253838234.xls
$
$
415,800
1,470,573
$
$
415,800
1,715,669
$
$
Page 4.3b.335
415,800
1,942,940
$
$
415,800
2,153,682
$
$
415,800
2,349,098
11:49:52
12/05/2014
LOW
--
CONSTANT-DOLLAR
ANNUAL
AND
DISCOUNTED
CUMULATIVE
NET
PRESENT
10
0.6855
0.6357
0.5895
0.5466
0.5068
0.4700
0.9057
1.0000
0.0000
1.0000
0.0000
1.0000
0.0000
1.0000
0.0000
1.0000
VALUES
0.0000
1.0000
MAIN CASE GROUP 5
LOW TEMPERATURE/PRESSURE AND MID
TOP ROW OF EACH PAIR : CONSTANT-DOLLAR ANNUAL NET REVENUES AFTER TAXES
M ROW OF EACH PAIR : CUMULATIVE NET PRESENT VALUE OF CASH FLOWS THROUGH LAST YEAR OF ANALYSIS T
$
1,578,147 $
1,312,080 $
1,312,080 $
1,312,080 $
1,312,080 $
1,312,080
$
1,574,067 $
2,408,142 $
3,181,557 $
3,898,724 $
4,563,733 $
5,180,378
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,863,670
23,369
$
$
322,539 $
(2,924,287) $
1,096,117
3,206,342
$
$
1,446,720
943,033
$
$
86,460 $
(2,869,325) $
1,029,600
3,860,847
$
$
1,446,720
1,795,813
$
$
86,460 $
(2,818,361) $
1,029,600
4,467,753
$
$
1,446,720
2,586,572
$
$
86,460 $
(2,771,103) $
1,029,600
5,030,519
$
$
1,446,720
3,319,822
$
$
1,446,720
3,999,744
86,460 $
(2,727,282) $
86,460
(2,686,648)
1,029,600
5,552,358
$
$
1,029,600
6,036,244
TOP ROW OF EACH PAIR : CONSTANT-DOLLAR ANNUAL NET REVENUES AFTER TAXES
M ROW OF EACH PAIR : CUMULATIVE NET PRESENT VALUE OF CASH FLOWS THROUGH LAST YEAR OF ANALYSIS T
$
2,176,855 $
1,644,720 $
1,644,720 $
1,644,720 $
1,644,720 $
1,644,720
$
(778,708) $
266,823 $
1,236,316 $
2,135,300 $
2,968,903 $
3,741,880
$
$
$
$
$
$
2,616,596
3,351,007
$
$
315,969 $
(2,892,205) $
1,368,554
3,110,326
AXG-9-20432-01
253838234.xls
$
$
2,216,940
4,760,292
$
$
83,160 $
(2,839,341) $
1,235,520
3,895,733
$
$
2,216,940
6,067,084
$
$
83,160 $
(2,790,322) $
1,235,520
4,624,019
$
$
Page 4.3b.336
2,216,940
7,278,836
$
$
83,160 $
(2,744,868) $
1,235,520
5,299,340
$
$
2,216,940
8,402,461
$
$
2,216,940
9,444,368
83,160 $
(2,702,719) $
83,160
(2,663,636)
1,235,520
5,925,545
$
$
1,235,520
6,506,209
11:49:52
12/05/2014
LOW
--
CONSTANT-DOLLAR
ANNUAL
AND
DISCOUNTED
CUMULATIVE
NET
PRESENT
10
0.6855
0.6357
0.5895
0.5466
0.5068
0.4700
0.9057
1.0000
0.0000
1.0000
0.0000
1.0000
0.0000
1.0000
0.0000
1.0000
VALUES
0.0000
1.0000
MAIN CASE GROUP 7
LOW TEMPERATURE/PRESSURE AND VERY H
TOP ROW OF EACH PAIR : CONSTANT-DOLLAR ANNUAL NET REVENUES AFTER TAXES
M ROW OF EACH PAIR : CUMULATIVE NET PRESENT VALUE OF CASH FLOWS THROUGH LAST YEAR OF ANALYSIS T
$
1,971,178 $
48,840 $
48,840 $
48,840 $
48,840 $
48,840
$
(26,438,561) $
(26,407,514) $ (26,378,725) $ (26,352,029) $ (26,327,275) $ (26,304,322)
$
$
3,888,971
10,210,972
$
$
3,587,760
12,491,673
$
$
3,587,760
14,606,504
$
$
$
$
424,785 $
(2,136,085) $
209,880 $
(2,002,666) $
209,880 $
(1,878,951) $
$
$
858,978 $
(4,874,145) $
393,360 $
(4,624,090) $
393,360 $
(4,392,221) $
3,587,760
16,567,530
$
$
3,587,760
18,385,936
$
$
3,587,760
20,072,093
209,880 $
(1,764,233) $
209,880 $
(1,657,859) $
209,880
(1,559,220)
393,360 $
(4,177,216) $
393,360 $
(3,977,847) $
393,360
(3,792,977)
TOP ROW OF EACH PAIR : CONSTANT-DOLLAR ANNUAL NET REVENUES AFTER TAXES
M ROW OF EACH PAIR : CUMULATIVE NET PRESENT VALUE OF CASH FLOWS THROUGH LAST YEAR OF ANALYSIS T
$
860,684 $
175,560 $
175,560 $
175,560 $
175,560 $
175,560
$
(8,788,660) $
(8,677,058) $ (8,573,573) $ (8,477,614) $ (8,388,634) $ (8,306,125)
$
$
197,778 $
(3,754,240) $
(56,760) $
(3,790,322) $
(56,760) $
(3,823,779) $
(56,760) $
(3,854,804) $
(56,760) $
(3,883,572) $
(56,760)
(3,910,247)
$
$
(105,285) $
(2,538,259) $
(223,740) $
(2,680,488) $
(223,740) $
(2,812,373) $
(223,740) $
(2,934,667) $
(223,740) $
(3,048,066) $
(223,740)
(3,153,218)
$
$
516,092 $
(901,568) $
349,800 $
(679,204) $
349,800 $
(473,012) $
349,800 $
(281,816) $
349,800 $
(104,524) $
349,800
59,873
AXG-9-20432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.3b.337
11:49:52
12/05/2014
ed, to a maximum duration of 15 years. The Figure of Merit plots indicate the cumulative NPV
aphically by changing the analysis term value. By selecting a value of 15 years, the table below
, materials, etc. This inflation rate is also used to correct the depreciation value (a non-inflating
owing).
nflation Compensation" factor compensates for the differential price inflation compared to the
n for depreciation.
ted as listed.
efore depreciation) - (tax rate) * [ (electricity revenue) * (price inflation factor) - (net costs
ual Net Revenues) * (NPV factor based on net discount rate after inflation)
t revenues and of depreciation, respectively, for only the years specified by the Analysis Term
er the last year of the Analysis Term.
AXG-9-20432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.3b.338
11:49:52
12/05/2014
PRESENT
VALUES
11
12
13
14
15
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
1.0000
0.0000
1.0000
0.0000
1.0000
0.0000
0.0000
1.0000
1.0000
MAIN CASE GROUP 1
TEMPERATURE/PRESSURE AND HIGH GAS CONTENT
ES AFTER TAXES
UGH LAST YEAR OF ANALYSIS TERM
$
$
$ (1,536,622) $
$
(1,536,622) $
$
(1,536,622) $
$
(1,536,622) $
(1,536,622)
$
$
$
(4,592,350) $
$
(4,592,350) $
$
(4,592,350) $
$
(4,592,350) $
(4,592,350)
$
$
$
(976,970) $
$
(976,970) $
$
(976,970) $
$
(976,970) $
(976,970)
$
$
1,247,817
$
$
1,247,817
$
$
1,247,817
$
$
1,247,817
$
$
1,247,817
ES AFTER TAXES
UGH LAST YEAR OF ANALYSIS TERM
$
$
$
(130,508) $
$
(130,508) $
$
(130,508) $
(130,508)
$
$
$
(5,043,565) $
$
(5,043,565) $
$
(5,043,565) $
$
(5,043,565) $
(5,043,565)
$
$
$
(403,637) $
$
(403,637) $
$
(403,637) $
$
(403,637) $
(403,637)
$
$
AXG-9-20432-01
253838234.xls
$
(130,508) $
1,100,253
$
$
1,100,253
$
$
1,100,253
Page 4.3b.339
$
$
1,100,253
$
$
1,100,253
11:49:52
12/05/2014
PRESENT
VALUES
11
12
13
14
15
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
1.0000
0.0000
1.0000
0.0000
1.0000
0.0000
0.0000
1.0000
1.0000
MAIN CASE GROUP 3
TEMPERATURE/PRESSURE AND LOW GAS CONTENT
ES AFTER TAXES
UGH LAST YEAR OF ANALYSIS TERM
$
$
$
(796,647) $
$
(796,647) $
$
(796,647) $
$
(796,647) $
(796,647)
$
$
$
(5,508,609) $
$
(5,508,609) $
$
(5,508,609) $
$
(5,508,609) $
(5,508,609)
$
$
$
(548,042) $
$
(548,042) $
$
(548,042) $
$
(548,042) $
(548,042)
$
$
505,525
$
$
505,525
$
$
505,525
$
$
505,525
$
$
505,525
$
$
1,689,188
$
$
1,689,188
$
$
1,689,188
ES AFTER TAXES
UGH LAST YEAR OF ANALYSIS TERM
$
$
$
1,689,188 $
$
$
$
(3,907,831) $
$
(3,907,831) $
$
(3,907,831) $
$
(3,907,831) $
(3,907,831)
$
$
$
(3,276,719) $
$
(3,276,719) $
$
(3,276,719) $
$
(3,276,719) $
(3,276,719)
$
$
AXG-9-20432-01
253838234.xls
1,689,188
2,349,098
$
$
2,349,098
$
$
2,349,098
Page 4.3b.340
$
$
2,349,098
$
$
2,349,098
11:49:52
12/05/2014
PRESENT
VALUES
11
12
13
14
15
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
1.0000
0.0000
1.0000
0.0000
1.0000
0.0000
0.0000
1.0000
1.0000
MAIN CASE GROUP 5
TEMPERATURE/PRESSURE AND MID GAS CONTENT
ES AFTER TAXES
UGH LAST YEAR OF ANALYSIS TERM
$
$
$
5,180,378 $
$
$
$
$
$
$
3,999,744
$
$
$
(2,686,648) $
6,036,244
$
$
5,180,378
$
$
5,180,378
$
$
5,180,378
$
$
5,180,378
3,999,744
$
$
3,999,744
$
$
3,999,744
$
$
3,999,744
$
(2,686,648) $
(2,686,648)
$
(2,686,648) $
6,036,244
$
(2,686,648) $
$
$
6,036,244
$
$
6,036,244
$
$
6,036,244
3,741,880
$
$
3,741,880
$
$
3,741,880
$
$
3,741,880
9,444,368
$
$
9,444,368
$
$
9,444,368
$
$
9,444,368
$
(2,663,636) $
(2,663,636)
ES AFTER TAXES
UGH LAST YEAR OF ANALYSIS TERM
$
$
$
3,741,880 $
$
$
$
$
$
$
AXG-9-20432-01
253838234.xls
9,444,368
$
$
$
(2,663,636) $
6,506,209
$
$
$
(2,663,636) $
6,506,209
$
$
$
(2,663,636) $
6,506,209
Page 4.3b.341
$
$
6,506,209
$
$
6,506,209
11:49:52
12/05/2014
PRESENT
VALUES
11
12
13
14
15
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
1.0000
0.0000
1.0000
0.0000
1.0000
0.0000
0.0000
1.0000
1.0000
MAIN CASE GROUP 7
MPERATURE/PRESSURE AND VERY HIGH GAS CONTENT
ES AFTER TAXES
UGH LAST YEAR OF ANALYSIS TERM
$
$
$
$
$
$ (26,304,322) $ (26,304,322) $ (26,304,322) $ (26,304,322) $ (26,304,322)
$
$
20,072,093
$
$
20,072,093
$
$
$
$
$
(1,559,220) $
$
(1,559,220) $
$
$
$
(3,792,977) $
$
(3,792,977) $
20,072,093
$
$
20,072,093
$
$
20,072,093
$
(1,559,220) $
$
(1,559,220) $
(1,559,220)
$
(3,792,977) $
$
(3,792,977) $
(3,792,977)
$
(8,306,125) $
$
(8,306,125) $
$
(8,306,125) $
(8,306,125)
ES AFTER TAXES
UGH LAST YEAR OF ANALYSIS TERM
$
$
$ (8,306,125) $
AXG-9-20432-01
253838234.xls
$
$
$
(3,910,247) $
$
(3,910,247) $
$
(3,910,247) $
$
(3,910,247) $
(3,910,247)
$
$
$
(3,153,218) $
$
(3,153,218) $
$
(3,153,218) $
$
(3,153,218) $
(3,153,218)
$
$
59,873
59,873
59,873
59,873
$
$
$
$
Page 4.3b.342
$
$
$
$
59,873
11:49:52
12/05/2014
SYSTEM
CAPACITY
VALUE
CAPACITY
UNITS
COST
VALUE
2-Stage System
Ejectors, condensers
Installation factor
motive
steam
data
motive
steam
data
Ejectors, condensers
Installation factor
Installed system cost
224,000
lb / hr
at 334 oF
110 psia
175,000
lb / hr
at 334 oF
110 psia
500,000
2.5
EJECTOR DES
Stage
$ 1,250,000
1
700,000
2.5
$ 1,750,000
Page 4.4.343
11:49:52
12/05/2014
TURBOCOMPRESSOR UNITS
1.50
300,000
Installation Fac
24 - inch compr
INSTALLED HYBRID
SYSTEM 3rd STAGE
COSTS
16 - inch
$ 4,800,000
4
$ 2,400,000
2
$ 1,740,000
1
$ 2,040,000
2
$ 4,800,000
4
$ 9,600,000
8
$ 34,680,000
28
$ 12,360,000
10
$ 4,800,000
4
$ 2,040,000
2
$ 3,120,000
2
$ 2,400,000
2
(*) Gas rates also carry matching steam loads at equilibrium conditions.
STEAM REBOILER
20
As Estimated
megawatts $ 2,782,000
1.00E+06
335
6- year escalatio
Sizing expone
53.7
Above is escalat
left and scaled u
equiva,lent to ba
quoted from Swe
Installation Fac
53.7
Equivalent Capac
Pressure (psia)
Gas Conc. (ppmv)
Equivalent Capacity :
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
110
30,000
53.7 MW Gross Output
Page 4.4.345
11:49:52
12/05/2014
Now take the average of the above two cases and scale up :
For estimating reboiler size and cost changes for differing cases, the primary basis of this study is the 50 MW plant power capac
conditions are based on the gross power ratio raised to a power factor. (see "Bases & Input" worksheet).
To calculate reboiler system price changes with differing steam conditions, the capacity factor includes ratios of the values of the
evaporation of steam at the two conditions being considered. This applies to capital cost calculations for the low-temperature ca
values drop out of the power factor ratios. The clean steam flowrate is theappropriate heat exchanger sizing basis, because for w
mass flow ratios would distort the sizing adjustments to the heat transfer area in the reboiler.
Steam latent heat at 335 oF (Btu/lb) =
883
US Filter / LO-CAT II
Chelation/Reduction H2S Scrubbing
System Cost
Operating Cost
Installation factor
Installed cost
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.4.346
11:49:52
12/05/2014
CAPACITY
UNITS
CAPACITY
COST
VALUE
UNITS
44,000
COST
2.9
NOTE: overall
ejector system
sizing will be
roughly
proportional to
plant power turbine
feed steam flow
rates and gas
loading.
2.7
0.6
Page 4.4.347
11:49:52
12/05/2014
o is now used to apply the power law for roughly estimating the
of a brine-driven eductor system :
T = (Ejector System Price) x (area ratio) exp. (Cost factor) =
Installation Factor :
24 - inch compressor $
INSTALLED
3rd STAGE
COST
$ 1,200,000
$ 600,000
$ 300,000
$ 600,000
$ 1,200,000
$ 2,400,000
$ 8,400,000
$ 3,000,000
$ 1,200,000
$ 600,000
$ 600,000
$ 600,000
6- year escalation :
Sizing exponent :
megawatts
1.50
360,000
1.19
0.6
6,010,549
installed cost
Installation Factor :
MW
Equivalent Capacity
1.50
3,500,000
5,250,000
Page 4.4.348
11:49:52
12/05/2014
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.4.349
11:49:52
12/05/2014
udy is the 50 MW plant power capacity. Costs at different generating capacities and the same steam
worksheet).
or includes ratios of the values of the clean steam flow to the power turbine, and latent heats of
culations for the low-temperature case studies. For the high-temperature case studies, the latent heat
xchanger sizing basis, because for wide-ranging values of gas concentrations, using the flashed-steam
.
Steam latent heat at 234 oF (Btu/lb) =
956
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 4.4.350
11:49:52
12/05/2014
Sheet 5. SensiComp
This worksheet compares the performance of the gas removal technologies at discrete data points for changed assumptions
prevailing wet bulb temperature at a plant site, and (2) a reduced value of the net efficiency of conventional steam jet ejector
show the change in the technical and economic figures of merit for each noncondensable gas removal technology for alterna
The first comparison tests the differences resulting from changing the assumed steam jet ejector efficiency from 23 percent to
percent value is the basis for the main cases in this study. This parameter does not directly change the various alternative te
performance abilities. Instead, since the figures of merit are relative values that compare the performance of gas removal alt
conventional steam jet ejector systems, the change in ejector efficiency shows up ultimately as changes in the technical figur
payback periods needed to recover the costs of conversion to the alternative gas removal systems.
The second change of conditions looks at a site ambient wet bulb temperature of 80 oF, compared to the value of 60 oF used
this study. Raising the wet bulb temperature hinders the heat rejection system. It also imposes a higher backpressure on the
leading to increased brine and steam flows through the power system. There is not much evident change in vacuum system
but cooling system electrical loads tend to increase slightly.
The "Relative Change" parameter under the "Economic" heading below indicates the economic impact of changes in system
alternative conditions. For the cases looking at ejector efficiencies, the changes are rated as percent change in the payback
reduced ejector efficiency compared to that of the main case results. A positive percent values represents a reduction in the
which is good. But beware of anomolous cases, e.g. comparing positive and negative payback estimates. A negative payba
conversion case could never pay for itself, so any positive payback looks good by comparison. Also, a reduction in the payba
essentially meaningless when comparing two very large numbers or two negative numbers, for example -- neither option in
attractive for capital investment.
If actual steam jet ejector efficiencies do turn out to be about 15 percent, instead of the main-case basis of 23 percent, the ec
the alternative gas removal technologies would be better, showing modest to strong reductions in the payback periods to rec
This occurs because at lower steam jet efficiencies, the gas removal options would realize higher reductions in the parasitic
yielding higher cost savings in operation.
The Relative Change parameter for the cases looking at the effects of different wet bulb temperatures is a simple ratio of pay
fractional value would indicate that the alternative conditions result in shorter payback periods. A whole number or negative v
Change parameter indicates that the alternative technology loses ground compared to the same case at lower wet bulb temp
Raising the ambient wet bulb temperature always extends the payback periods for converting to alternative gas removal proc
negative payback values gives anomalous results.
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 5.351
11:49:52
12/05/2014
Sheet 5. SensiComp
TECHNOLOGY
3-Stage Turbocompressor
Reboiler
Biphase Eductor
Produced
Fluid
Temperature
o
F
Flashed
Steam
Gas Level
ppmv
550
49,900
Wet
Steam Jet
Bulb
Ejector
Temperature Efficiency
o
F
Percent
60
350
10,100
60
550
30,400
350
10,100
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 5.352
Figures of
Technical
15
23
15
23
15
23
15
23
1.18
1.06
1.13
1.01
1.04
1.02
1.09
1.05
15
23
15
23
15
23
15
23
1.12
1.07
1.12
1.07
1.03
1.02
1.08
1.05
60
80
60
80
60
80
60
80
23
1.03
1.04
0.99
1.01
1.03
1.03
1.02
1.03
60
80
60
80
60
80
60
80
23
1.04
1.07
1.04
1.07
1.01
1.02
1.04
1.05
11:49:53
12/05/2014
Sheet 5. SensiComp
RATING PARAMETERS
al technologies at discrete data points for changed assumptions about (1) the
uced value of the net efficiency of conventional steam jet ejectors. The comparisons
erit for each noncondensable gas removal technology for alternative assumptions.
nging the assumed steam jet ejector efficiency from 23 percent to 15 percent. The 23
his parameter does not directly change the various alternative technologies'
relative values that compare the performance of gas removal alternatives to
r efficiency shows up ultimately as changes in the technical figure of merit and
o the alternative gas removal systems.
bulb temperature of 80 oF, compared to the value of 60 oF used in the main cases of
t rejection system. It also imposes a higher backpressure on the power turbine,
r system. There is not much evident change in vacuum system drive gas demand,
ding below indicates the economic impact of changes in system operation at the
encies, the changes are rated as percent change in the payback period at the
results. A positive percent values represents a reduction in the payback period,
ing positive and negative payback estimates. A negative payback indicates the
yback looks good by comparison. Also, a reduction in the payback period may be
bers or two negative numbers, for example -- neither option in such cases would be
15 percent, instead of the main-case basis of 23 percent, the economic argument for
owing modest to strong reductions in the payback periods to recoup capital costs.
removal options would realize higher reductions in the parasitic steam demand,
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
Page 5.353
11:49:53
12/05/2014
Sheet 5. SensiComp
Figures of Merit
Economic
Payback
Relative
Years
Change
AXG-9-29432-01
253838234.xls
2.6
8.4
4.4
-100.9
6.1
13.5
1.2
2.1
69%
xx
104%
xx
55%
xx
41%
xx
1.5
2.6
7.1
15.3
29.1
539.1
0.644
0.893
43%
xx
54%
xx
95%
xx
27.91%
xx
5.4
11.2
-38.7
-14.2
7.6
8.5
1.5
1.9
xx
2.1
xx
0.4
xx
1.1
xx
1.3
2.6
4.8
15.3
43.4
539.1
-77.6
0.89
1.28
xx
1.8
xx
2.8
xx
-0.1
xx
1.4
Page 5.354
11:49:53
12/05/2014