Sei sulla pagina 1di 7

HELEN M.

ANTONIO
Med- Science
Analysis of Variance
1.
Participants were randomly selected and divided into three groups for the purpose
of testing three different methods of weight reduction. One method used exercise, one
method used dietary techniques, and another method used a standard drug treatment. The
reduction in weight (in Pounds) was recorded after 6- month period. The results are as
follows
Diet
Exercise
Drug
15
10
7
12
12
6
10
8
8
11
9
6
12
a. Is there a significant variation in the data to reject the hypothesis x diet = x exercise = x
drug at x = 0.05?

Decision: Reject Ho.

Decision: Reject Ho.


Conclusion: Significant difference was marked by looking the mean difference which is
significant at 0.05 level. Thus, there is significant differences shown by the groups and this was
between the diet and the drug group.
2. Students with nutritional status of Severely wasted were randomly selected and divided

into three groups for the purpose of testing three different methods of weight gain using
feeding program. One method used feeding in the morning, and another in the afternoon,
and another in early dinner. The gain in weight (in kilograms) was recorded after a 6month period. The results are as follows:

Breakfast
5
2
2
1
2

Lunch
2
7
8
5

Dinner
1
2
1
1

a. Is there a significant variation in the data to reject the hypothesis x Breakfast = x Lunch
= x dinner at x = 0.05?

Decision: Reject Ho

T-test for independent samples


A study on what men and women think about sex bias shows the following results. High Scores
means positive view or less sex bias. Scores are shown below.
Men
Women
80
85
72
89
71
76
60
83
65
85
70
84
78
88
79
86

a. Is there a difference in perception? Use alpha= 0.05.

Decision: Reject Ho. The computed t is greater than the critical value.
Conclusion:
There is a significant difference between the two groups views on sex bias with women
having better views than men. (Go back to the means for a better analysis). Men showed more
prejudices to women thought.
2. Urban and rural youths were compared over the number of projects they sponsored within the
duration of their term. Results are shown below:
Project Sponsored
Urban
Rural
5
2
4
1
2
3
3
2
1
1
2
2
3
1
3
2
2
1
1
3
2
2
3
2
4
3
4
2
a. Is there enough evidence to claim that urban youths have more projects than rural youths?
Use = .05

The table shows that since the computed t, 2.300 is greater than the critical value, the null
hypothesis is rejected.
There is significant difference between the numbers of projects sponsored by the two
groups: urban and rural youths. (Go back to the means for a better analysis). Urban youths have
more projects than rural youths.
Pearson Product- Moment
1. Is there a relationship between salary and job satisfaction?
Individual
1
2
3
4
5
6

Salary / mo (thousand)
30
20
21
18
15
11

Job Satisfaction
100
78
99
85
86
80

Decision: Accept Ho since the computed rho (0.724) is less than the critical value
Conclusion: Due to insufficient evidence, the null hypothesis failed to be rejected. There is no
relationship between salary and job satisfaction.
The Sprearman Rho

The following figures show the evaluation of freshmen and sophomore students of their
teachers.
Teachers
Freshmen
Sophomores
1
10
9
2
9
10
3
8
8
4
7
7
5
6
5
6
5
4
7
4
6
8
3
3

Decision: Reject Ho since the computed rho (0.905) is greater than the critical value.
Conclusion: the ratings given by the freshmen and sophomores to their teachers are related. It
means that the ratings are valid.

Potrebbero piacerti anche