DPR - Water Shed Managkent

GUJARAT STATE WATERSHED MANAGEMENT AGENCY
Detailed Project Report

IWMP-1 (Patan)
District Watershed Development Unit - Jamnagar
Detailed Project Report IWMP-1 (Patan )
Detailed Project Report

IWMP-1 (PATAN)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Project Background........................................................................................................................... .................. .................. ........................................ ........9
Table no.1: Basic project information.................................................................................................................. ................ .................. .............................9
Table no.2: Watershed information............................................................................................................. .................. ........... ................ ..........................9
Table no.3: Weight age of the project........................................................................................................................................ .................. ........................11
Table no.4: Developmental programmers running in the project area:......................................................................................... ................ ................13
Table no.5: Previous Watershed programmers in the project area: ........ ........ ..............................................................................................................12
Project Implementing Agency.......................................................................................................................................................................................16

Table no. 6: PIA:..................................... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ...................20
Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level: ....................................................................................................................................... ....... ............... .........20
Basic Information of Project Area .............................................................................................................................................................................23

Table no. 8: Land use Pattern: .............................................................................................................................................................................................24
Table no. 9: Soil type and Topography:................................................................................................................................................................................25
Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition:..........................................................................................................................................................................26
Table no. 11: Soil Erosion.....................................................................................................................................................................................................26
Table no. 12 Climatic Condition...26
Table no. 13: Physiography and relief................................................................... ................... ................... ................... ................... ...............................27
Table no. 14: Land ownership details ................................................................................................................ .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ...............................28
Table no. 15: Agriculture .....................................................................................................................................................................................................28
Table no. 16: Irrigation.......................................................... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ..........................28
Table no. 17: Livestock................................................................................................................................................................................ .... .29
Table no. 18: Drinking Water.............................................. .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ................................................29
Table no. 19: Demographic Information....................................... .... .... ... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ..............................30
Table no. 20: Literacy Rate.............................................. .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ....... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ............................30
Table no. 21: Migration details......................................................... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .........................................31
Table no. 22: Poverty.................................................................................................................................................................... .... .........................31
Table no. 23:Village Infrastructure.................................................. .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .. .... ...............................32
Table no. 24: Facilities/HH assets..................................... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .....................33
Tableno. 25:Income......................................................... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... . .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .......................33
Tableno. 26: Dependenceon Forest/CPR..34
Tableno. 27: Livelihood Pattern(Occupational Distribution)34
Watershed Activities ..................................................... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ........................38
Table no. 28: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects ......................................................................................... .... ........................43
Table no. 29: Watershed Committee details.......................................................................................................................................... .... ....45
Table no. 29.1: Watershed Committee details(Paradva) ..................................................................................................................... .... ....46
Table no. 29.2: Watershed Committee details(Amrapar)...................................................................... .... ....47
Table no. 29.3: Watershed Committee details(Malavada)........................................................................ .... ....47
Table no. 30: SHG detail......................................................................................................................... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .............................50
Table No. 31 The following types of groups were planned to be formed in Patan Project... ...................................................................................45
Table no. 32: UG detail............................................................................................... .................... .................... .................... ............................................51
Table no. 33: Entry Point Activites(EPA) ......................................................... .................... .................... .................... ...........................................52
Table no.34: Details of activates of preparatory phase..53
Table 35: Activities Related to Surface water resources in the Project Areas .....................................................................58
Table no:36: Activities related to ground water resources in the project areas...............................................................................................................60
Table no: 37: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Group(SHGs)........................................................................................................................61

Table no.:38 Other Activities of Watershed work phase-Proposed target.................................................................................................................63
Table no.39 Detail of Engineering Structures in Watershed work....................................................................................................................64
Table no. 39.1 Technical Specification of stone bund......................................................................................................................................................67
Table no. 39.2, Technical Details of Staggered Contour Trenches ....................................................................................................................................68
Table no 39.3, Quantity Calculation......................................................................................................................................................................................69
Table no 39.4, Cost Estimation of Staggered contour trench and stone bounding...........................................................................................................70
Table no. 39.5 Cost Estimation of Staggered contour trench per village.....71
Table No 39.5, Technical Details of Border Contour Trench.............................................................................................................................................66
Table no 39.2, Quantity Calculation of Border Contour trench ........................................................................................................................................66
Table No 39.3. Cost Estimation of Border Contour .............................................................................................................................................................67
Table no 40.1. Technical details of Earth Bund No.l............................................................................................................................................................68
Table no 40.2, Quantity Calculation of Earth Bund No.l ...................................................................................................................................................69
Table No, 40.3, Cost Estimation of Earth Bund No.l...........................................................................................................................................................69
Table No, 41.1, Technical Details of Afforestation Activities.............................................................................................................................................70
Table No, 41.2, Cost Estimation for afforestation activity..................................................................................................................................................70
Table No, 42.1 Technical Details of Farm Pond 1................................................................................................................................................................71
Table No, 42.2, Quantity Excavation for Farm Pond 1........................................................................................................................................................71
Table No, 42.3, Cost Estimation of Farm pond No.l...........................................................................................................................................................72
Table No, 43.1, Technical Details of Farm Bund ................................................................................................................................................................73
Table No, 43.2, Quantity Excavation for Farm bund...........................................................................................................................................................73
Table No. 44 Cost Estimation of Farm Bund No.l...............................................................................................................................................................74
Table No. 45, Summary of Soil and water conservation Structures and activity...............................................................................................................75
Table no. :46, Details of activities of preparatory phase (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)..............................................................................................75
Table no.: 47, Institutes Identified for Capacity Building..................................................................................................................................................77
Budgeting.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................79
Table no. 48: Budget at a glance............................................................................................................................................................................................79
Table no.49: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes ................................................................................................................................80
Table no. 50: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects........................................................................................................................................80
Table no. 51: Employment in Project area...........................................................................................................................................................................82
Table no. 52, Details of seasonal migration from Project area ..........................................................................................................................................83
Table no. 53: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters) ............................................................................................83
Table no. 54: Status of Drinking water.................................................................................................................................................................................84
Table no. 55 : Details of crop area and yield in the project areas .......................................................................................................................................84
Table no. 56: Area under horticulture..................................................................................................................................................................................85
Table no. 57: Forest/vegetative cover...................................................................................................................................................................................85
Table no. 58: Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in litres, for solids please mention in kgs. and income
inRs.)........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................86
Table no. 59: Backward-Forward linkages..........................................................................................................................................................................87
Quality and Sustainability Issues..........................................................................................................................................................................................94
Table No. 60. Details of Watershed Development Fund (WDF) ........................................................................................................................................95
CHAPTER - 1
PROJECT BACKGROUND
1.1 Project Background

Patan (IWMP-1) project is located in Jam Jodhpur Taluka, Jamnagar District of Gujarat state. The project consists of Nine micro
watersheds with 5G1A8b2h, 5G1A8b2i, 5G1A8b2g, 5G1A8b2j, 5G1A8b2k, 5G1A8b2f, 5G1A5a2e 5G1A5c2j 5G1A5a2f as their respective codes.
The total project area of the watershed is about 9271.69Ha, of which 7271.69Ha is proposed to be treated under Integrated Watershed
Management Programme (IWMP).
The nearest town is JamJodhpur which is about 15 Km from project area and well connected by pucca road .The Patan Project consists of
four villages the detail information of all villages is mentioned in this report. Ahir, Darbar, Bharvad, Bramhin, Rabari, Gadhavi, Patel,
Kori,Kumbhar and Harijan communities are the primary inhabitants of the projects. The livelihood of these people is primarily based on rainfed
agriculture, wage labour, livestock, goat and sheep rearing.
Table no. 1 : Basic project information

Sr.
No.
Villages
Name of
the project
Area
Gram
Name
Census code
Panchayats
Taluka
District
Area of
proposed
the project
to be
treated
1
2
3
Patan
IWMP-I,
Patan
Paradava
Amrapar
100100078340000
100100078360000
100100078370000
Patan
Paradava
Amrapar
3212.80
Jam
Jodhpur
Total
project
PIA
cost
2712.79
DCF
Jamnagar
1998.50
1498.52
2779.40
2279.44
1090.7535
Teritoriyal
JAMNAGAR
Malvada
100100078350000
Malvada
Total
1280.90
780.94
9271.69
7271.69
Table no. 2 : Watershed information

Name of the project
No. of watersheds to be
Watershed code
Watershed regime/type/order
treated
IWMP-I Patan
Nine
5G1A8b2h,
5G1A8b2i,
5G1A8b2g,
5G1A8b2j,
5G1A8b2k,
5G1A8b2f,
5G1A5a2e,
5G1A5c2j ,
5G1A5a2f
DDP
Need of Watershed Development Programme

Typically in our country, rain falls very intensely within few hours, within a few days, within a few months of every year. The number of
rainy days does not average more than 40-50 in most part of the country. The challenge is to find ways of using this water where it falls. The aim of
watershed development is to stop and conserve the rainfall where it falls, so that it can be used for longer period of time. The balanced ecosystem
and human system are vital indicators of a sustainable environment and better quality of human life. In rural areas, livelihood and natural
resources such as land, water, vegetation and livestock are inter-linked. Indias national economy is dependent on agriculture and the
magnificence of its natural resources is legendary. As 70% of our cultivated land fall under the rain-fed areas, Watershed Management is one of
the critical factors for improving agricultural production. The natural resource base on which existence of living beings depend-soil, water and
vegetation is under degradation. Most of the arid and semi-arid regions have concentrations of eroded and degraded natural resources. Loss of
vegetal cover, followed by soil degradation through erosion, has resulted in lands lacking in water as well as solid nutrients.
Watershed Development Programme is selected on the basis of thirteen parameter namely Poverty Index, Percentage of SC/ST, Actual
wages, Percentage of small and marginal farmers, Ground water status, Moisture Index, Area under rainfed agriculture, Drinking water situation
in the area, Percentage of the degraded land, Productivity potential of the land, continuity of another watershed that has already
developed/treated, Cluster Approach for hilly terrain. Based on these thirteen parameter a composite ranking was been given to Patan project as
given in table no. 3.
The total number of families under BPL is 574, which is less than 20 per cent of total households of the villages. Hence a score of 2.5 is
allotted. The percentage of schedule castes in the village is about 10 per cent to the total population; hence a score of 5 is allotted.
Rain fed agriculture forms the primary occupation of the village due to the fact that ground water is saline and hence unfit for usage. More
than 60 per cent of the farmers are small and marginal by nature and the actual wages earned by the labour is less than the minimum wages hence
a composite rank of 5, 3 and 5 are allotted respectively.
Since the rainfall received is erratic and irregular, the moisture index is low and the area is classified under DDP block. Drinking water is
problematic in the village. Majority of land is degraded due to inherent rainfall and due to no soil conservation structures in the project area. The
soil is very permeable and production of the land can be significantly enriched with the availability of timely irrigation.
Area proposed to be treated
Table no. 3 : Weightage of the Project

Project
Project
name
type
Weightage
IWMP I
DDP
ii
iii
iv
vi
vii
viii
ix
Xi
xii
xiii
7.5
10
7.5
10
10
15
15
Other projects/scheme running in the Project area:

(1)
MGNREGS: Bori Bandhoad-Patan, Metal Road,R.C.C Road-Paradava, Natha Meramans Farm To Javal Metal Road-Amrapar, Metal
Road, Land Development,Levling-Malavada
(2)
WASMO: Water tanks,Pipe Line-Malavada.
(3)
Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC): Under progress no special work has been done.
(4)
Swarnjayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana (SGSY )-Business Loan, Well
Dipping Loan-Patan, Business Loan-Paradava, Business Loan-
Amrapar, Business Loan-Malavada
(5)
Awas Yojana : (Total05 house has been constructed in the Patan project under various Awas Yojana) in which under Indira Awas
Yojana Patan=60, Earth Quake = 19, Indira Awas Yojana Earth Quake = 20 and Sardar Awas Yojana = 6
Table no.4: Developmental programmers running in the project area:

Sr.
Name of the
No.
programme/scheme
1
2
3
4
WASMO
NREGS
IAY
SGSY
Sponsoring agency
Govt of Gujarat
Central Govt.
Central Govt.
Central Govt.
Objectives of the
Year of
Villages
Estimated
programme/scheme
commencement
covered
number of
Water supply
Employment
Housing
Woman empowerment
2007
2009
2005
2004
4
4
4
4
454
beneficiaries
155 household
105 House
254
hold
Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmers in the project area:

Sr. Project Year
Name of No. Of
Watershe Area
Fundin Nodal PIA
Total
Expenditure %
% physical
No. name
village s
d codes
g source agency
cost
incurred up financial
completion
started
micro
watershe
under
treatment
to start of
d
1
DDP
1999-2000
Hariyali 2005-06
Pre-Har 1999-2000/
yal il & 2006-07
Hariyali
Hariyali 2002-03,
2006-07
Patan
5G1B2a2e 500 ha
govt
DWDU Umiya
Paradava
5G1B1b2k 500 ha
govt
DWDU Umiya
5G1B1b2d 1000 ha
govt
DWDU Umiya
Amrapar
Mataji
Mataji
completion
IWMP
3000000 2800000
100 %
85 %
2250000 2100000
100%
78%
5250000 4200000
100%
85%
3000000 2200000
100%
75%
Mataji/Talu
ka
Malvada
5G1B2a4n 500 ha
govt
DWDU GSLDC
Panchayat
Discussion with Villagers

CHAPTER - 2
PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY
Project Implementing Agency

The Project Implementing Agency (PIA) is being selected by an appropriate mechanism by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA). PIAs would be
responsible for implementation of watershed project. These PIAs may include relevant line departments, autonomous organizations under State/
Central Governments, Government Institutes/ Research bodies, Intermediate Panchayats, Voluntary Organizations (VOs).The PIA of Patan
watershed Project (IWMP-I ) is District Watershed Development Unit, Jamnagar
District Watershed Development Unit, Jamnagar.

The organization and its objectives:
The District Watershed Development Unit (DWDU), Jamnagar is a district level nodal agency and was established on 13th May 2008 to oversee
for the smooth implementation of watershed projects in the district. The District Development Officer (DDO) is the chairman of the DWDU. The
DWDU have dedicated and experience staffs comprising one Project Manager (deputation from Gujarat Forest Department) a Technical Expert
(on contract basis) and multidisciplinary team of agriculture expert, community mobilization expert, Civil engineer, MIS coordinator, system
analyst, surveyor, accountant and computer operator are recruited. The DWDU Jamnagar has its own rented office at Sardar Patel Bhavan, Near
Rameshwar Mandir, Jamnagar .
The objective of the DWDU Jamnagar are supervising, planning, implementing, documenting and promoting watershed development projects
and related development activities in the district. Moreover, the DWDU Jamnagar will work as a PIA for some IWMP projects.
Programmes/projects running in the district

At present six IWMP projects have been sanctioned by Government of India for the Jamnagar district. The entry point activities of all the six
IWMP projects have identified by the respective PIAs in the district. Jamnagar Forest Division as PIA for the four projects (IWMP-1, 2, 4 & 6)
and DWDU-self is as PIA for the two projects (IWMP-3 & 5).
Apart from the running six IWMP projects, total 614 pre-Hariyali & Hariyali projects (DDP,State watershed, EAS, IWDP) has been sanctioned
and out of that 126 projects are completed and 488 projects are still running in the district. The DWDU Jamnagar is also monitoring a central
government sponsored scheme on "Artificial Recharge of Groundwater through Dugwells" in the district.
SWOT Analysis of the DWDU:
Strength:
(1) Dedicated and fully experience staffs and multidisciplinary team with required qualification
(2) Independent District Level Nodal Agency with separate office.
(3) Strong linkages with national and state level institutions, agricultural universities, and NGOs for capacity building and technical guidance
(4) Scientific planning in watershed projects with the help of BISAG, Gandhinagar
(5) District level monitoring, coordination & Cooperation Committee
(6) Well establishment of PRIs for social audits
Weakness:
(1) Insufficient funds for complete watershed projects per hectare.
(2) No permanent staff i.e. contractual staff
(3) No permanent office building.
Opportunities:
(1) Sustainable livelihood generation landless and asset less.
(2) Improvement of socio-economic status of poors
(3) Awarness generation among the illiterates through IEC activities by usage of new ICT activities.
(4) Reduction of migration rate.
(5) Usage of new technologies of watershed modeling and GPS for monitoring the watershed activities.
(6) Continuous learning
Threats:
(1) Political interference in implementation of programme.
(2) Delay of releasing project fund from the higher authority
(3) Lack of contribution and cooperation from local peoples.
(4) Low and erratic rainfall in the project area.
(5) Low literacy rate in the project area.
Table no. 6: PIA:

Sr. No.
Names of project
Details of PIA
(i)
1
IWMP-I Patan Project (ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
[ii)
(vi)
(iii)
(ivj
(v)
Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level: (vi)
Sr.
No.
Name
Age
District Level Nodal Agency

Deputy Conservator of Forest ,Territorial, Jamnagar
Type of organization
Name of organization
Address
Telephon
Fax of organization
Name
E-mail
Designation
& Address
Telephone
Fax
E-mail
Sex
Designation
Ganjivada,Nagnath gate,Jamnagar
0288-2553026
0288-
Qualification
Experience
Job assigned
25
Project Management
Monthly
remuneration
B.Sc. (Agri) &

1
S.M Paramar
54
Project Manager
Diploma Forestry
47,000
(GFS)
Monitoring & To
2
C.V. Band
25
Technical Expert
M.Tech.
Assist in Project
25000
Management
Physical works
3
J. H. Parmar
33
MDT Eng
DCE
supervision and
report
15000
SHG and social

4
M.V. Khirsariya
32
MDT Co.
MRS
awareness
15000
programmes
Agriculture activities
5
K.L.Ahir
27
MDT Agri.
MRS
supervision &
Motivation
9000
Programmes
6
A.V. Vaghera
23
MDT Account
MBA
S. D. Chandra
25
MDT DEO
M.A., B.Ed.
2 Year, 3
Months
5
Account
8000
Maintain Data Sell
6000
Physical works
8
M.L. Sonagara
25
WDT Eng.
DCE
supervision and
8000
report
Agriculture activities
9
R.R. Vala
26
WDT Agri.
BRS
supervision &
Motivation
Programmes
8000
SHG and social

10
U.A Rabadiya
23
WDT Co.
B.A.
6 Month
awareness
8000
programmes
11
A.I. Paramar
28
WDT Account
B.Com.
Account
7000
12
R.A.Tank
19
WDT Surveyor
Surveyor
Surveying
6000
13
K.J. Makwana
30
WDT D.E.O.
B. Com D.C.S.
Computer Operator
5000
CHAPTER - 3
Basic Information of Project Area
3.1 Basic Information of Project Area

Project area is located in the district of Jamnagar about 105 Kms. from district headquarters. The project area is characterized by high
temperature and low varying rainfall. The proposed watershed project has a land area of 9271.69 ha of which 7271.69 ha will be treated. The
villages are characterized by undulating land, rocky strata with varying slopes. The drainage density is high and there is excessive runoff of water
causing high soil erosion. The soil and underground water is highly saline which results in acute shortage of drinking water. People have to
commute around 0.5-1 km to fetch drinking water from panchayat water supply
3.1.1 Land use pattern:

The net geographical area of Patan Project is about 9271.69 Ha and there is forest area 233.35 ha. Total land under agriculture use is 33.72 %
which is 7271.69 Ha. And out of agriculture 66.28 % is under rain fed.
Table no. 8: Land use pattern:

Wasteland
Names of
Geographical Area
Forest
Land under
Rainfed
Perm-anent
villages
of the village
Area
agricultural use
area
pastu-res
Cultivable
Non-cultivable
Patan
3212.80
1030.80
1078
98.0
2084
Paradava
1998.50
697
788.10
152.1
1149.5
Amrapar
2779.40
1378.40
1804.40
654
747
Malvada
1280.90
39.4
91.90
267.90
182
967.60
Total
9271.6
39.4
3938.4
1086.1
4948.1
Sr. No.
3198.10
3.1.2 Soil and topography:

Patan project falls under North Saurashtra of Gujarat agro climatic zone. The soil is shallow medium black. The soil is brown to very dark grayish
brown in surface colour.The depth of soil is moderate to medium deep about 45 to 100 cm. The predominant texture of soil is silt and clay. The
fertility of soil is moderately poor with low nitrogen, phosphorus and potash. The topography of the area is moderate ranging from 4-10 % slope.
Table no. 9: Soil type and topography:

Sr. No.
Name of the Agro-climatic

zone covers project area
1
2
North Saurashtra
3
4
Area in ha
a)Type
Major soil types

b) Area in ha
3212.80
Patan
1998.50
Paradava
Yellow Moorum
and soft rock and
Medium Black
Yellow Moorum
2779.40
Amrapar
Yellow Moorum
and soft rock
2779.40
1280.90
Malvada
Yellow Moorum
and hard rock
1280.90
Total
9271.6
Names of the
villages
3212.80
1998.50
9271.6
Topography
Moderate hilly
region and
undulating flat
area
Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition:

Sr.
1
No.
2
3
4
Village
Patan
Paradava
Amrapar
Malvada
Flood (Incidence)
Nil
Drought (Incidence)
Once in 3 Years
Nil
Nil
Nil
Once in 3 Years
Once in 3 Years
Once in 3 Years
Table no. 11: Soil Erosion

Cause
Type of erosion
Area affected (ha)
Run off (mm/ year)
Average soil loss (Tonnes/

ha/ year)
Water erosion
Sheet
Rill
Gully
Ravenous
Sub-Total
Wind erosion
Total
a
b
c
d
2036.07
1163.47
1628.86
30-40%
4828.40
0
4828.40
NA
Table no. 12: Climatic condition

Sr. No.
Year
Rainfall (in mm)
Temperature (C)
Highest intensity of Rainfall

(mm in a day)
1
2
3
4
5
6
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
321
368
616
215
601
543
Max.
42
43
45
42
Max.
43
41
Min.
31
29
30
31
32
29
32
69
95
34
90
71
7
8
9
10
2005
2006
2007
2008
616
655
1061
641
44
43
42
45
28
29
30
37
105
109
142
120
Table no. 13: Physiographic and relief

Village name
Elevation
Patan
Paradava
Amrapar
Malvada
Slope range (%)

4-10%
Major streams
Small & Big streams like nala,Gala Valo Stream
4-10%
2-7%
4-10%
Ubera Valo Stream,Tekari Stream

Malar Stream,Shell Stream
Gandya pir Strream,Sumiya Dhuna Stream
3.1.3 Land and Agriculture

55 percent of the total area is dependent on rainfall. The rainfall is highly scanty which has resulted in recurrent phenomenon of drought two to
three years. The average rainfall of this area is about 563.7 mm (from past ten year data) with a highest intensity of 86.7 mm (in a day). This
uneven distribution is leading to runoff of soil every year to the streams and rivulets.
Lack of surface water source and high salinity of ground water has decreased sufficient base for irrigation as well as for drinking purpose. The
average land holding is about 2.5 ha of which the land holding is ranging from 1 to 4 Ha. Lack of irrigation source forces the majority of these
farmers to migrate to ensure their livelihood. This affects directly the demographic profile of the village. The major crops cultivated by the
farmers are cotton, groundnut and Bajra (Pearl millet) in the village. Some of the farmers take up rainfed castor if the rains are good. The land
conservation measures such as farm pond, earthen bunds and farm bunds in the area will help them to take up a rabi crop of mustard or cumin
and vegetables in the residual moisture.
Table no. 14: Land ownership details
Sr. No.
Village
Total owned land (Ha)
Patan
Paradava
Amrapar
Malvada
1
2
2
3
4
Gen
35.80
191.72
116.96
0
OBC
977.40
567.90
1881.32
256.32
SC
9.64
ST
16.12
others
8.32
17.58
ST
2.92
0
0
0
HH giving
HH taking
land on lease
25.12
46.20
16.23
0
land on lease
77.31
27.31
9.12
0
Table no. 15: Agriculture

Sr. No. Village
1
Patan
2
23
Paradava
Amrapar
4
Malvada
Net sown area

Two times
101.60
122.0
456.0
12.20
One time
1078
788.10
1804.40
267.90
Three times
40.64
36.60
182.40
4.88
Table no. 16: Irrigation

Sr. Village
No.
1
2
23
4
Patan
Paradava
Amrapar
Malvada
Source 1 : Canal
Availability Net area
months
Source 2 : Check dam / Pond

Source 3 : Well/Bore
Gross area Availability Net area Gross area Availabilit Net area
months
y months
Gross
area
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
142.24
158.6
638.4
17.08
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
8
8
8
8
101.60
122.0
456.0
12.20
3.1.4 Livestock
The project area has about 1211 cows and 3107 buffalos out of which majority are of local breed, there are 796 bullock, 582 goats and 608 sheeps.
Majority of Rabari and Bharwad community depends on goat and sheep rearing for their livelihood. Lack of rain and surface water has reduced
the fodder and pasture area for their animals. This leads to heavy migration to other parts of the state with their herds of goats and sheep. The
productivity of the dairy animals is so low that there is no dairy cooperative in the village.
Table no. 18: Livestock

Sr.
Village
Buffalo
Cow
Total Milk
No.
1
2
3
4
Goat
Sheep
Bullock Calf
Others
No.
256
174
271
95
796
2
0
1
0
3
(Buffalo+Cow
Patan
Paradav
a
Amrapar
Malvada
Total
No
1134
250
386
1337
3107
milk
204120
45000
69480
240660
559260
No
774
151
114
172
1211
Milk
92880
18120
10260
20640
141900
]
297000
63120
79740
261300
701160
No.
130
301
75
76
582
Milk
7800
18600
4500
4560
35460
No
39
423
144
2
608
milk
1950
21150
7200
120
30420
No.
424
129
251
339
1143
Table no 19. Drinking water

Sr.
No.
Village
Patan
Paradava
Amrapar
Malvada
Ground water table (mt)
Source of drinking water
25 to 35 mt
Well, Bore
3.2 Socio-Economic Profile

Availability in months Quality

Portable
Portable
8 to 12
Portable
Portable
3.2.1 Demographic Status: Patan watershed project mainly covers four villages which as total 1169 household with a net population (as per
base-line survey) with3371 males and 2900 female .The sex ratio is about 913 females to 1000 males. There are about 96 BPL families. The average
family size is of five members. The literacy rate is average about 170 per cent with male literacy rate of 198 per cent and a female literacy rate as
low as149 per cent .The major castes in the villages are Ahir, Maher, Patel, Darbar, Bharvads Rabari, Brahmin and harijan. Majority of
population is involved in agriculture and animal husbandry.
Table no. 21: Demographic information

Sr.
Village
Population
SC
ST
No.
Patan
Paradava
Amrapar
Malvada
Total
Total
2561
Male
1342
Female
1219
Total
270
Male
141
Female
%
9.48
Total
Male
Female
129
66
34
22
2.57
1203
2006
501
654
1099
276
549
907
225
90
210
10
49
115
6
41
95
4
13.91
9.55
2
6271
3371
2900
580
311
269
34.94
0
0
10
76
0
0
5
39
0
0
5
27
0
0
2
4.57
Table no. 22: Literacy rate

Sr. No.
Village
Total
Patan
Paradava
Amrapar
Malvada
Total
Literacy % above Literacy % below
Literacy
%
950
658
Total
1200
92
37.09
54.69
59.82
18.36
Male
543
388
714
62
2900
42.49
1707
age 14
age 14
40.46
59.32
64.97
33.33
Female
407
270
486
30
33.39
49.18
53.58
13.33
49.52
1193
37.37
56.52
65.65
70.33
69.42
261.92
43.48
34.35
29.67
30.58
138.08
Migration Pattern: Migrate during summer season to various parts of the state like Gandhidam, Surat, Bhuj Junagadh and Suarashtra as daily
wages agricultural labours and construction workers. Lack of fodder availability and grazing land for smaller ruminant also forces these farmers
to migrate to other places.
Table no. 23: Migration details

Sr. No. Village
Total
population
Migration
Male
Female
Total
Migration by months
Up to 3
3-6 months
months
Patan
Paradava
Main reason
More than 6 for migration
months
2561
896
627
269
180
358
358
1203
275
192
83
55
82
138
For Better
Employment
Income
during
migration /
Rs 4500/month
month
Rs 4800/month
and low
Amrapar
Malvada
Total
2006
100
70
30
20
30
50
productiviy of Rs 4750/month
501
60
42
18
15
15
30
land
6271
1331
931
400
270
485
576
Rs 3800/month
Table no. 24: Poverty

Sr.
Village
Total Household
BPL
%of BPLHH
Total Land less HH
% of land less HH
No.
1
2
3
4
449
238
397
85
Patan
Paradava
Amrapar
Malvada
0-16
262
27
16-20
35
10
15
104
49
0-16
27
1169
Total
96
Total
366
76
45
42
81.51
31.93
11.33
49.41
96
264
93
147
44
58.80
39.06
37.03
51.76
548
Table no. 25: Village infrastructure

Sr. Village
Pucca
Schools
Colleges
Post Office Banks
Distance Milk
Milk
Other
Any other
No.
road to LP
UP
HS
(Number) (Distance) (Number) from
collection
cooperative cooperatives institution

(Number)
the
nearest
centre
village
market
(Number)
/CBIs
(Number)
1
2
Y
Patan (Y/N)
Y
Paradav
a
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
yard10
35
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Amrapa
r
Malvada
20
12
15
Infrastructure facilities: : Patan watershed is well connected with Taluka with pucca roads. The village has electricity connecting under
Jyothigram yogana of Gujarat government. Nearly 75 per cent of households in the village have their personal electric meters. Since ground water
is highly saline electicity is not used for agricultural purpose. Patan, Paradava, Amarapar and Malavada villages have primary schools with all
facilities like electricity, water facilities, computers etc. For further study like middle and higher secondary education Patan and Malavada village
students have to go to Taluka level at Jamjodhpur which is about 14 kilometers away. While Paradva and Amarapar village students have to go to
nearest village at Mervadar for further study which is about 10 kilometers away. This is yet another reason for lower education level of the people.
The villages do not have a Primary Health Centre for which Patan and Malavada villagers have to go to Taluka level at Jamjodhpur which is
about 14 kilometers away. While Paradva villagers have to go to Khagasri village which is about 12 kilometers away. And Amarapar villagers
have to go to Mervadar village which is about 10 kilometers away. There is no proper state transport facility to the village as there is only a bus
while rest of the village travels by a local vehicle called Chakda in emergency situation or elce their own vehicles.
Table no. 26 : Facilities / HH assets

Sr.
Village
HHs with
HHs with
HHs with phones
HHs with vehicle
HHs with
HHs with
HHs with
HHs with
No.
electricity
1
2
3
4
Patan
Paradava
Amarapar
Malavada
428
225
397
66
safety
latrines
5
18
53
0
Land line
Mobile
2 -wheeler
4- wheeler
TV set
cooking gas Drinking
0
0
0
0
426
226
394
48
25
42
108
16
0
0
13
0
8
41
81
3
0
0
0
0
Land line
freedge
water
34
139
207
8
0
2
8
0
Livelihood pattern: The villagers earn their livelihood from animal husbandry and agriculture. And during lean seasons they go as daily wage
labourers in stone cutting and in farmers.
Table no. 27: Income

Sr no
Village
Agriculture
Animal husbandry
Casual labour
Others
Total
Patan
9075302
4909700
41351000
312000
55648002
Paradava
12456836
446000
2221000
425000
15548836
Amarapar
23793600
716000
2780000
1502500
28792100
Malavada
704500
2632800
173500
3510800
Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR

Sr. No.
Village
1
2
Charcoal making
Fodder
Total income (Rs)
% sells
Income (Rs)
% sells
Income
Patan
Paradava
Amarapar
Malavada
Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution)

Sr.
No.
Village
Total
workforce
Animal
Agriculture
husbandry
(AH)
Agriculture
Casual
+ AH
labour
Services
Handicraft
Salt Pan
Labours
Patan
1525
678
253
78
569
36
15
Paradava
772
453
42
63
261
18
Amarapar
1335
847
14
73
356
15
Malavada
354
169
133
99
51
Comparative data of the crop productivity of the area: project area vs. District vs. State vs. Country vs. world
Introduction:
The purpose of this study is to provide a comparative analysis of productivity of Patan project area with reference to world, India, Gujarat,
Jamnagar district Jamjodhpur taluka. "The term productivity in general means the total output per unit of factor input. For example land
productivity means output per hectare of land. Productivity is an average and is calculated by dividing the total output of a particular crop
by the total cultivated area under that crop."
Data are made available by the Baseline survey (project area), Handbook of Agriculture, ICAR publication 2006(For
Gujarat and India), and Final district plan (DAP) of Dept. of Agriculture (for Jamnagar). The results indicate that project area has very
low productivity compared to world, India, Gujarat and Jamnagar. The productivity is low not only because that the land is
unproductive or the farmers lack the skills to manage their crop but also due lack to of source of irrigation and scarcity of rain. The
world productivity of groundnut is 1550 kg/ha. In India it is grown in about 8 million hectors with production of 8.06 million ton and
productivity of 1032 kg/ha. Gujarat alone produces 39% of total groundnut of our country from 25% of the area with a productivity of
about 1561 kg/ha. As compare to Gujarat and India, Jamnagar district has comparatively good productivity1625 kg/ha. The Patan
project area has only 1275 kg/ha productivity. It is very low compare to district, state, India and World.
Ground Nut Productivity Kg/Ha

2000
1561
1550
1625
1500
1275
1032
1000
World
India
Gujarat
Jamnagar
Patan
500
0
World
India
Gujarat
Jamnagar
Patan
The cultivation of cotton & its manufactures into textiles has been practiced in India since pre historic times. India ranks 1st in area and 4th in
production. The world productivity of lint cotton is 700 kg/ha. India grows cotton in 9.5 million hectors with production of 5.2 million tons and
productivity of 503 kg/ha. Gujarat has 2.51 million hectors area under cotton, which produces 1.87 million tons of cotton with productivity of 746
kg/ha. As compared to India & Gujarat, Jamnagar district has good productivity 750 kg/ha. But the Patan project area has only 520 kg/ha.
productivity.
Cotton Productivity Kg/Ha

800
700
746
700
600
750
520
503
500
400
World
India
Gujarat
Jamnagar
Patan
300
200
100
0
World
India
Gujarat
Jamnagar
Patan
The Patan project area has low productivity because of the following reasons:
i)
Full dependence on monsoon:

Patan village is dependent on monsoon. Water is essential input in agriculture. Due to the absence of proper irrigation facility, 80% of the
total cultivated area depends on the uncertain monsoon. Therefore, the suceess or failure of the monsoon determines the success or failure
of agriculture production.The rainfall is unreliable due to two factors: untimely and inadequate.
ii)
Low use of fertilizer per unit cropped area:

Farmers do not use sufficient fertilizer due to lack of water, scarcity of fertilizer in market and insufficient money for fertilizer. Many a
times they dont get fertilizer at the right time.
iii)
Traditional farming methods:

This also leads to low productivity. There is a lot of ignorance about the use of new farming methods and technologies such as multiple
cropping. They dont use FYM and other input in a proper way; that is why they dont get 100% output. So these factors contribute to low
productivity.
iv)
Lack of adequate farm machinery:

Even today a large number of farmers in Patan use wooden ploughs and bullocks. They dont have adequate machinery like seed drill. So,
old machineries take more time in tillage practices.
v)
Lack of finances for farmers:

In Patan most of the farmers are marginal and small. They do not have enough money to buy good quality seeds, machinery and other
inputs.
vi)
Lack of good quality seeds and fertilizers:

Good quality seed, fertilizer and pesticide are important factor in agriculture productivity. The use of good quality leads to higher land
productivity. In Patan, however, there are two limitations in the use of fertilizer. First these fertilizers are most useful in irrigated condition.
But in Patan 80 per cent of land depend on rainfall. In Patan mostly farmers use nitrogenous fertilizers especially urea. This has resulted in
disproportionate use of fertilizer depleting the quality of land.
vii)
Lack of other facilities such as storage and marketing:

5-10% of agriculture product damage after harvesting due to scarcity of proper storage and proper market for sale. So he sells to local
traders at the low prices. Farmers mainly face proper means of transportation and roads. And second problem is farmers dont have
proper storage facilities.
CHAPTER - 4
WATERSHED ACTIVITIES
Watershed Activities
Watershed management as a strategy has been adapted by Government of India especially in the rainfed regions of semi-arid tropics. These
regions are characterized by low and undependable rain, low soil fertility, poor infrastructure development, low literacy and high incidence of
migration. The inheriting low fertility of crops results in high productivity of crops which have a very low biological efficiency.
Several studies have identified that there is a dire need of a systematic and scientific approach to deal with watershed development. The common
guidelines generate a fresh and flexible framework for the next generation watershed development.
4.1
Scientific Planning:
1. Cluster Approach
This envisages a broader vision of Geo-hydrological unit which involves treating a cluster of micro-watershed. The Patan Project consists of three
micro- watersheds namely 5G1A8b2h, 5G1A8b2i, 5G1A8b2g, 5G1A8b2j, 5G1A8b2k, 5G1A8b2f, 5G1A5a2e 5G1A5c2j 5G1A5a2f as their
respective codes. Further Patan watershed project is in continuation with other watershed project namely Vansjaliya Project this gives an element
of continuation of the programme.
2. Base line Survey

To access the impact of any watershed development programme a detailed baseline survey has to be conducted. This acts a benchmark for any
intervention during and post implementation of any development programme. A detailed baseline survey has been undertaken which involved
household census survey, Bio-physical survey and Village level data collection from Talati -cum mantri. Household census survey includes a
detailed questionnaire which has been filled by visiting each and every house-hold in the village. This provide the details of the demographic
profile of the village, the literacy percentage, SC/ST population, number of BPL household, cattle population, net consumption rate in the village,
average milk production of the cattle, social and economic condition of villagers and various schemes running and their benefits.
Bio-physical survey has been undertaken to identify various natural resources available in the village. It included the soil typology, well in the area,
crop taken in the field, Cropping pattern, fertilizer used and various sources of irrigation in the field.
3.
Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA)
The PRA tools like Focussed Group Discussion (FGD) were used to gather information from rural areas where watershed programme is going to
be implemented. The past experience of watershed has given tremendous input to focus on creating accountability of the stakeholders towards the
programme. This has created an emphasis to include all the stakeholder communities and their local and Indigenous Technological Knowledge
(ITK) while planning for any activity. Participatory approach provides a new path for planning, implementing, monitoring and post- withdrawal
activities with a complete accountability of the stakeholders. This decreases the efforts of the ground staff i.e WDT members and involves more of
villagers as implementers. Various PRA techniques like resource mapping, social mapping, season calendars were used to understand the physical
and social orientation of the village in general and watershed in specific. These tools put the villagers in ease than the complicated questionnaires.
Various tools like Matrix ranking, Venn diagram were used to identify various local vegetations (apt for afforestation), Fodders crops, various
institutions and their significance in the life of the farmers.
4. Use of GIS and Remote sensing for planning

Use of various high science tools has been promoted at various stages of watershed development.
a) Prioritization
Geographical Information System (GIS) has been used for prioritization process. Various layer maps were created like Geo-morphological, Soil,
BPL Population, SC/ST population, Ground water Status, Drinking water situation Slope percent. These were all given proper weightages
according to the DoLR specification. This helped in prioritization of various watershed areas.
b) Planning
A action plan matrix was been formulated by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) taking into account various features like the slope percent, soil
Depth, Soil Texture, Soil erosion in the area for wasteland, forest land and agricultural land.
Global positioning System (GPS) was used to identify each and every water conservation structures available in the project area. This will be used
to create a map. Contour Map of vertical interval of 1 meter at a scale of 1:8000 was used for identifying various location specific for soil and water
conservation structures.
c) Hydrological modelling
Hydrology modeling technique was been used for locating drainage, stream length, flow direction, sink, Flow accumulation. This model overlaid
over cadastral map hel to calculate the catchments area of each structures like the check dam etc. This has helped to remove the human error
which generally occurring while calculating the catchments area of a check dam.
Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects
Sr.
Scientific criteria/ inputs used
Whether scientific criteria was used
No.
1
(A) Planning
Cluster approach
Yes
Whether technical back-stopping for the project has been arranged? If yes, mention the name of the
Baseline
Institute survey
Hydro-geological survey
Contour mapping
Participatory Net Planning (PNP)
Remote sensing data-especially soil/ crop/
run-off cover
Ridge to Valley treatment
Online IT connectivity between
[1] Project and DRDAcell/ZP
[2] DRDA and SLNA
[3] SLNA and DoLR
Availability of CIS layers
1. Cadastral map
2. Village boundaries
3. Drainage
4; Soil (Soil nutrient status)
5. Land use
6. Ground water status
7. Watershed boundaries
8. Activity
Crop simulation models*
Integrated coupled analyzer/ near infrared visible spectroscopy/ medium spectroscopy for high speed
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
soil
nutrient difference
analysis vegetation index (NDVI)#
Normalized
Weather Station
Yes
(B) Inputs
1. Bio-pesticides
Yes
2. Organic manures
3. Vermicompost
4. Bio-fertilizer
5. Water saving devices
6. Mechanized tools/ implements
7. Bio-fencing
8. Nutrient budgeting
9. Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers
Any other (please specify)
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
4.2 Institution Building

1. Watershed Committee (WC)
It is a committee that is constituted by Gram Sabha to implement the watershed project with technical support of WDT in the village. This
committee was registered under society Registration Act 1860. The Gram sabha of the village selects the chairman of the watershed committee
with the secretary who will be a paid functionary. A watershed Committee was formed accordingly in Patan Project. Capacity building training to
the watershed committee was given by WDT member.
The watershed committee has a pivotal during various processes like the PRA and over planning of various points.
Table no. 31: Watershed Committee details (PATAN)
Sl.
N
o.
Names of
WC
Date of
Registrat
ion as a
Society
(dd/mm/
yyyy)
Name
Designati
on
M/F
S
C
ST
SF
MF
L
F
Land
-less
U
G
SH
G
G
P
Educational
qualification
Function/s
assigned
Watershed
committee
Patan
Under
progress
Rajabhai Maldebhai
Odedara
President
Mangabhai
Vasharambbhai
Ludariya
Vice
President
Ranmalbhai Kanabhai
Parmar
Secretary
Ramuben Karabhai
Ludariya
Member
Menaben Jerambhai
Parmar
Member
Hiriben Savdashbhai
Odedara
Member
Murubhai Mangabhai
Vinjuda
Member
Virambhai Nagabhai
Paramar
Member
Karabhai Karanabhai
Odedara
Member
Karabhai Devabhai
Taliya
Indubha Bhavansang
Sodha
12
Y
Member
Member
Table no. 31.1Watershed Committee details (PARADAVA)

Sl.
N
o.
Names of
WC
Date of
Registrat
ion as a
Name
Designati
on
M/F
S
C
ST
SF
MF
L
F
Land
-less
U
G
SH
G
G
P
Educational
qualifi-
Function/s
assigned
Society
(dd/mm/
yyyy)
Watershed
committee
Paradava
Under
progress
cation
Ramdebhai Virambhai
Odedara
President
Bhanubhai Bhimabhai
Pata
Vice
President
Vallbhbhai Chhaganbhai
Khant
Secretary
Rambhai Rudabhai
Vinzuda
Member
Jila Dana Ranavadiya
Member
Champaben Prbhudash
Khant
Member
Sajanaben Devabbhai
Paramar
Member
Hiriben Nathalal
Odedara
Member
Kanabhai Bhimabhai
Khunti
Member
Nrendrabhai Vithalbhai
Khant
Member
Sanjaybhai Hajabhai
Odedara
Member
B.com
12
Y
Y
10
Y
Y
4
12
Table no. 31.2Watershed Committee details (AMRAPAR)
Sl.
N
o.
Names of
WC
Watershed
committee
Amrapar
Date of
Registrat
ion as a
Society
(dd/mm/
yyyy)
Under
progress
Name
Designati
on
M/F
Devabhai Jethabhai Jogal
President
Keshubhai Samatbhai
Modhavadiya
Vice
President
Nagabhai Nathabhai
Khunti
Secretary
Nurjaha Karimbhai
Patta
Member
Valiben Devabhai
Karavadra
Member
Liriben Jivabhai Khunti
Member
Murubhai Khimabhai
Rathod
Member
Bhanubhai Chhaganbhai
Makvana
Member
Rajeshbhai Bhagavanji
Peshivadiya
Member
Murubhai Jashabhai
Modhavadiya
Member
Kanabhai Bhimabhai
Khunti
Member
S
C
ST
SF
MF
L
F
Land
-less
U
G
SH
G
Educational
qualification
7
4
Y
Y
G
P
Y
Y
Y
Y
Function/s
assigned
Table no. 31.3atershed Committee details (MALAVADA)
Sl.
N
o.
Names of
WC
Watershed
committee
Malavada
Date of
Registrat
ion as a
Society
(dd/mm/
yyyy)
Under
progress
Designati
on
M/F
Jivabhai Karanabhai
Bharai
President
Zinabhai Hamirbhai
Bharai
Vice
President
Rajubhai Batukbhai
Bharai
Secretary
Panchabhai Nathabhai
Bharai
Member
Bhojabhai Amrabhai
Vaish
Member
Rudabhai Hamirbhai
Bhint
Member
Mendbhai Palabhai
Khaniya
Member
Hiriben Polabhai
Khaniya
Member
Unjiben Chanabhai
Khaniya
Member
Bhupatbhai Fogabhai
Bharai
Member
Karmanbhai Hamirabhai
Member
Name
S
C
ST
SF
MF
L
F
Land
-less
U
G
SH
G
Y
Y
G
P
Educational
qualification
Function/
s assigned
3
-
Bhint
2. Self Help Group

Self Help Groups are motivated, small homogenous group organized together through highly successful of credit and thrift activities. Self help
group initiative especially for women help to uplift their livelihood. Generally self help group includes landless and marginal sized farm women,
BPL household, SC/ST women.
SHG initiative in Vinjalpar project was being organized by having a focused group discussion between various homogenous communities of
women based on their livelihood separately. Each group discussed their basic problems with their facilitators. The major problems identified are:
a)
Lack of proper credit facilities due to low intervention of formal financial credit instititutes.
b)
Excessive exploitation of weaker section by money lenders
c)
Lack of attitude of saving among poor people due to complex and rigid conventional financial institution structures.
d)
Lack of small micro-loans without collaterals and high interest rates.
e)
Lack of knowledge on credit, Thrift activity and banking.
f)
Less knowledge of record keeping due to lack of guidance and training
g)
There is no specific goal and vigion
With a view point of these problems it was planned to organize these women into a group consisting of 12 to 20 in each groups and it was also
proposed to have 8 groups.
With a detailed discussion with some of the local NGOs working in the area like SEW A, it was planned to have some capacity building training
regarding SHG activities. It was also proposed to have some livelihood activities which will promote women empowerment this included spices
packing, embroidery activities with forward and backward linkage. This will ultimately lead into better human development in the village.
Table no. 32: SHG detail

Sr. No.
Total no. of registered SHGs

With
only
Men
Total
With only
Women
With
both
Total
19
23
19
23
3. User Group:
No. of members
Categories
(i) Landless
(ii) MF
(iii) SF
(iv)
n SFLF
Total
102
5
48
0
155
17
1
5
0
23
119
6
53
0
178
No. of SC/ST in each

category
M
F
Total
3
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
3
No. of BPL in each

category
M
F
Total
74
6
15
0
95
10
2
2
0
14
84
8
17
0
109
(in) MF
(iv) LF
These are homogeneous groups of persons having landholding within the watershed area. They are normally formed to manage an activity or asset
on a long .term basis. The user group collect user charges from their members. Some of the points which were considered while forming a user
group in Patan were :
1)
In case of a checkdam all the beneficiaries of the individual check dam where involved as user group members.
2]
In case of Fodder bank all the individual beneficiaries of animal husbandry are considered as potential members.
3)
Membership was on voluntary and democratic.
Focused group discussion was conducted to between the user groups to discuss the above conditions and to select potentia members. It was
advocated that each group to formulate certain internal rules and have a feeling of ownership with community spirit.
Table No. 33 The following types of groups were planned to be formed in Patan Project
S. No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Name of User Group

Potato Wafers Production Group
Chilly Powder Packing Group
Paper Dish Group
Mandap Decoration Service Group
Papad Production Group
Sing Bhujiya Group
Washing Powder & Packing Group
Bharat and Stiching Work & Sivan Group
Chap Cutter, Khedan Sati,Orani,Plastik
Major Task
Production of Potato Wafers.
Production of Chilly Powder.
Production of Paper Dish
Service of Mandap Decoration
Production of Papad
Production of Sing Bhujiya
Production of Washing Powder
Production of Bharat and Stiching Work & Sivan
Service of Chap Cutter, Khedan Sati,Orani,Plastik Carrate,Spry Pump
Carrate,Spry Pump Group

10
11
12
13
14
15
Writing Chock Group

Check Dam/Waste Vier Group
Cause way group
Vermi compost/ Organic Farming Group
Fuel and fodder/ Gobar bank Group
Animal Husbandry Group
17
18
Khettalavadi Group
Farmbund and Earthernbund Group
19
Fodder bank Group
20
Nursery Group
Production of Writing Chock

To ensure irrigation and enhance Ground Water Table.
Connectivty Between Village area and Farm area
For modern Agriculture development
Development of Gauchar land and proper use of renewable source
Bringing of new AH technology
Management of New Cattle and their improvement
Equitable sharing of resources
Equitable sharing of resources Assuring of proper work
Ensure fodder security in village
Development of community land for fodder development
Timely supply of enriched fodder at affordable price.
Maintenance of nursery plot
Ensure Timely supply of seedling for afforestation.
Table no. 33.1: UG detail

S. No,
Total no. of UGs
No. of SC/ST category
No. of members
No. of BPL in each
Men
Women
Both
Total
Categories
Total
Total
category
F
Total
64
20
27
111
(i) Landless
128
16
144
32
38
36
45
(ii) SF
(iii) MF
203
297
26
50
229
347
27
22
5
2
32
24
24
21
4
2
28
23
(iv) LF
72
700
11
103
83
803
9
90
4
17
13
107
11
92
3
18
14
110
Total
4.3 Physical Activities to be undertaken under IWMP, PATAN

fii) SF
4.3.1 Entry Point activity (EPA)

[iii] MF
EPA activities are certain important works which
are in urgent demand of the local community. This helps in establishment of credibility of
fiv) LF
watershed Development Team (WDT). It also acts as a rapport building activity of the village community. A group Discussion was conducted with
watershed Development Committee regarding the EPA activity, it was conveyed to the amount of Rs. 55.62 Lakh was allotted for EPA activity,
which was 4 per cent of total allocated budget. The villagers discussed various activities which they felt is important but after a brief discussion it
was conveyed to them that only those activities can taken, which revive the common natural resources. It was also taken into priority that there
should be an instrument of convergence which will result in sustainability of activities.
Table No. 34 Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)
Sr.
No.
Names of Villages
Amount earmarked
for EPA(Lakh)
Patan
16.2767
Entry Point Activities planned

(1) Distribution of Water Pipe
(1)269800/-
Line,Lenth=710 mt.
(2)560000/-
(2) Pond Deepening(100x150x1.5)
(3)923000/(4) 45000/Total = 1797000/-
(3) Drainage and Severage Line(1000 mt

Estimated cost (Lakh)
Expected outcome
Facility for drinking water,
Drainage line make clean and
healthy to village people.
with NREGA Convergence)

(4) Water Cooler and Filter Plant
8.9911
Paradava
(1) Water Cooler and Filter Plant
(1) 45000/-
(2) Roof Shed in Gaushala & C.C.on
(2) 750000/-
Drinking water facility, Animal
Ground Floor
(3) 60000/-
shed
(3) Grass Godawon Repairing (10mx7m)
Total =855000/-
(1) Water Cooler and Filter Plant (Nos.-2)

(2) Over Head Water Tank(Height=12 Mt)
13.6766
Amrapar
(1) 90000/-
with capacity of 50000 lit
(2) 740356/-
Drinking water facility, Animal
(3) Computer Training to youth
(3) 25000/-
shed and prevent wastage of
(4) Roof Shed in Gaushala & C.C.on
(4) 512000/-
fodder.
Ground Floor
Total =1367365/-
Malvada
4.6856
Causway of Road connected,Lenth=30mt.
Total
43.63
Total
450000/Total =450000/-
Road connectivity
Table no. 35: Details of activities of preparatory phase (All financial figures in lakhs)
Printing
Sr.
Name of
No.
villages
Initiation of
village level
institution
Capacity
IEC
Baseline
Hydro-geological
building
activities
survey
survey
Technical
DPR and
Estimated
support
mapping of
Cost (Rs. in
agencies
project
lakh)
Area
1
Patan
0.04069
0.10172
0.04069
0.3716
0.54
0.04069
0.020
4.06
Paradava
0.02247
0.05619
0.02247
0.300
0.44
0.02247
0.020
2.24
Amrapar
0.03419
0.08547
0.03419
0.370
0.64
0.03419
0.020
3.41
Malvada
0.01171
0.02928
0.01171
0.170
0.23
0.01171
0.020
1.17
4.3.2 Watershed Development Works:

Watershed development works is to be done during implementation phase of watershed. Treatments begin from the highest point of the watershed and
move progressively downwards (ridge to valley), starting with the smallest stream and culminating in the main river of the watershed. Work is
location-specific, varying according to slope and geology as also the size of the stream being treated. The aim is to weave interventions into the contours of
nature, not to seek mastery over it. A net budget of 50 percent is allotted for this work.
.
Ridge Area Treatment Plans
In a watershed, the slopes falling from the ridge to the beginning of the plains are called ridge area. It is very important to treat the higher reaches of
the ridge has this is where the major water resources originate. This involves mainly highly and forest region in the watershed. Various watershed
managing structures should be build to arrest the erosion and degradation of forest with grasses in upper ridges.
1. Boulder Checks
2. Gabions3
3. Grass seedling/planatation
1. Boulder Checks
Boulder checks or gully plugs are loose rock dams made on small drainage lines or seasonal streams which have a catchment area of less
than 50 ha. It is adopted where the water velocity is high and where basically stone available with in radius of 100-150 m from the site. The main aim of
constructing loose boulder checks is to reduce the velocity of water flowing through the drainage line. By reducing the velocity of runoff, boulder checks
help in:
1. Reducing soil erosion;
2. Trapping silt which slows the rate of siltation in water harvesting structures in the lower reaches of the watershed.
3. Creating a hydraulic head locally which enhances infiltration of surface runoff into the groundwater system; and
4. Increasing the duration of flow in the drainage line. Therefore, the capacity of the water harvesting structures created downstream on the
is utilized more fully as they get many more refills.
drainage line
2. Gabions
Gabion structures are rock and wire dams constructed across drainage lines with a catchment area of 50-500 ha. They are also constructed to reinforce
highly erodible stream embankments. The main aim of constructing gabion structures is to reduce the velocity of water flowing through the drainage
line. By reducing the velocity of runoff, gabion structures help in
1. Reduction in soil erosion
2. Trapping silt, which reduces the rate of siltation in water harvesting structures in the lower reaches of the watershed.
3. Increasing recharge of groundwater and
4. Increasing the duration of flow in the drainage line. Therefore, the capacity of the water harvesting structures created downstream on the
drainage line is utilized more fully as they get many more refills.
Drainage line Treatment and water harvesting:

The second tier treatment is the slope treatment. This is generally agricultural land or waste lands. These are generally water conservation or
surface water storage structures. These being highly labour intensive will involve more of manual labour so schemes like National Rural
Employment Guarantee Scheme (NREGS) can be taken. Following structures has been proposed in the project villages.
1. Check dams/Causeway cum check dams
2. Waste Weir
1. Check dams
Check dams are constructed across small streams having slope the selected should have sufficient thickness of permeable bed or weathered
formation to facilitate recharge of stored water within short span of time. The water stored in these structures is mostly confined to stream course
and the height is normally less than 2m and excess water is allowed to flow over the wall in order to avoid scouring from excess runoff water
cushions are provided at downstream side. To harness the maximum run off in the stream series of such check dams are to be constructed to have
recharge on regional scale in project villages.
2. Waste weirs
These are constructed for giving a safe passage to the excess runoff from the field and also store some amount of water in the field. The water
stored in these structures is mostly confined in field and height is normally less than 0. 5 mt. and excess water is allowed to flow over the wall.
Plains or Flat level/Field level:
1. Farm pond
2. Irrigation/Percolation dam
3. Farm bund
4.Trench excavation and Refilling for reducing salinity ingress
5. Afforestation
1) Farm Pond:
There is very little qualitative difference between a pond/ tank, which usually serves the population of a village, and farm pond, which serves an
individual agricultural field. Farms ponds greatly vary in size depending upon the rainfall. These have only a few meters of length and width and
are built across the flow path of natural drainage channels. Surplus water from one pond spills over to a lower pond. In some cases a series of farm
ponds are built on one single stream. Each pond caters to the irrigation needs of one farm and also augments ground water recharge. Percolation
Dam: Percolation dams are constructed for recharging groundwater. Such structures are usually made on the upper part of the catchment area.
Water stored here percolates to wells and tubewells located in the lower part of the catchments. Such dams can also be made in the immediate
upstream portion of wells and tubewells. Depending on the capacity of the dam and duration of water storage, the dam can have secondary
benefits (such as pisciculture) that are vital for the livelihood security of marginal farmers and landless laborers.
2) Irrigation/Percolation dam
a) Irrigation Dam: Such dams can be constructed to meet two different kinds of demands.
of storing water during the rainy season to be used for irrigation in the post-monsoon period.
of providing protective irrigation during dry spells within the rainy season. Most parts of India typically receive rainfall between
June and September, very intensely within a few hours and a few days. The number of rainy days does not average more than
40-50. Moreover, rains are extremely erratic, often characterized by late onset and early withdrawal. Prolonged dry spells during
the rainy season, resulting in agricultural droughts, are also frequent. Hence, the kharif crop needs to be drought-proofed through
'protective' irrigation, applied to overcome accumulated soil moisture deficits within the rainy season. Such structures are
especially important in areas which are poor in groundwater resources and which do not have access to canal irrigation. Such areas
form about half of India's agricultural area.
b). Percolation Tank: Percolation dams are constructed for recharging groundwater. Such structures are usually made on the upper part of the
catchment area. Water stored here percolates to wells and tube wells located in the lower part of the catchment. Such dams can also be made in the
immediate upstream portion of wells and tube wells. Depending on the capacity of the dam and duration of water storage, the dam can have
secondary benefits (such as pisciculture) that are vital for the livelihood security of marginal farmers and landless labourers.
3) Farm bund
Farm bunds are constructed on agricultural land with the aim of arresting soil erosion and improving the soil moisture profile. Ideally, bunds on
farms should be made on the contour line. But this creates several problems for farmers. Contour bunds divide the field into irregular sections. In
such a situation, it becomes inconvenient to maneuver bullocks for operations such as ploughing and line-sowing.
4) Afforestation
a.
Emphasis is placed on maximizing the use of available land and resources with high yield tree species. Trees can either be of similar species or mixed in a manner that
will result in a stand or forest. Depending on the climate, geographical layout of the area and the soil conditions, trees that have the greatest growth potential are selected like
Babool, Neem, Sesame and Ailanthus
Table no.36: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)
Village
name
Type of structures
S.
No.
(i) Farm Pond
(ii)Irrigation/Percolation
Tank
Patan
(iii) Check dam
(iv)Causeway cum check
dam
Paradava (i) Farm Pond
Proposed target
Augmentation/ repair of existing
Construction of new structures
Total target
structures
Area to
Area to
Area to
Storage Estimated
Estimated
Estimated
be
be
Storage
be
Storage
No.
capacity
cost
No.
cost(in
cost(in
irrigated
irrigated capacity
irrigated capacity
(Cumec)
(Lac)
Lack)
Lack)
(ha)
(ha)
(ha)
7
40
3500
0.56
40
3500
0.56
0
0
0
0
1
10
25000
9.25
10
25000
9.25
250
50000
4.40
14
280
115000
29.91
540
165000
34.31
105
8945
8.25
105
8945
8.25
35
2670
0.40
35
2670
0.40
Tank
(iii) Check dam
dam
(i) Farm Pond
Amrapar
Tank
(iii) Check dam
dam
(i) Farm Pond
Tank
Malavada
(iii) Check dam
dam
17
385
195000
58.63
385
195000
58.63
32
65000
6.05
32
65000
6.05
10
55
4800
0.80
55
4800
0.80
14
296
125000
54.12
296
125000
54.12
105
95000
50.05
105
95000
50.05
20
2600
0.24
20
2600
0.24
240
56000
17.27
240
56000
17.27
264
54000
13.53
264
54000
13.53
Table no.37: Activities related to ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)
Sr.
No.
Village name
Augmentation/repair of existing
Proposed target
Construction of new recharging
recharging structures
structures
Type of structures
Area to be
No.
irrigated
(ha)
Estimated
cost(in lake)
No.
Total Target
Area to be
Estimated
Estimated irrigated(Ha) cost(in lakh)
irrigated (ha) cost(in lake)
Area to be
i) Open Wells
25
1.0
45
225
2.70
225
2.70
ii) Bore wells
15
75
0.90
75
0.90
Patan
iii) Any others
49
232
3.60
232
3.60
i) Open Wells
45
225
2.70
225
2.70
ii) Bore wells
98
392
5.88
392
5.88
iii) Any others
143
617
8.58
617
8.58
iii) Open Wells
180
900
10.80
900
10.80
iv) Bore wells
80
320
4.80
320
4.80
iii) Any others
260
1220
15.60
1220
15.60
v) Open Wells
13
65
0.78
65
0.78
vi) Bore wells
12
0.18
12
0.18
iii) Any others
16
77
0.96
77
0.96
947
4360
57.48
4360
57.48
Total for village
Paradava
Total for village
Amrapar
Total for village
Malavada
Total for village
Total
Table no. 38: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas
Sr.
Names of
No.
Villages
Major activities of the SHGs

Name of activity
No. of
Total
Average annual income
SHGs
Cost
from activity per Year(in
involved
Per
Rs. Approx)
Unit
1
Vermi composting
Potato Wafer
production
10
22632
48054
141200
248400
Fooder Benk
347200
192800
Paper Dish
76000
139200
109700
100800
Papad Making
150000
2640000
Door Mat
45000
60000
60000
43250
28200
35000
386000
Mandap Decoration
5
6
Service
Patan
Groundnut
Processing
Stretching Work &
Sivan
10
Animal Distribution
Paradava
15 (150
nos)
Total
43
3935854/-
Vermi composting
22632
48054
6000
0.0
Chap
Cutter,Orani,Plastick
Carrat,Spry Pump
Chilly powder
163000
312000
35000
386000
109700
100800
347200
192800
141200
248400
60000
60000
Papad Making
150000
264000
Total
35
packing
Animal Distribution
Mandap Decoration
Service
Fodder Bank
Potato Wafer
production
Groundnut
Processing
Chilly powder
packing
4
5 (50
nos.)
1732654/-
163000
312000
Papad Making
150000
264000
Vermi composting
22632
48054
35000
386000
60000
60000
141200
248400
5
6
Amrapar
Animal Distribution
Groundnut
Processing
Potato Wafer
10(100
nos)
production
7
Chalk Stick Making
6000
40000
Fodder Bank
347200
192800
Total
37
Vermi composting
Animal Distribution
Malavada
22632
48054
42000
386000
347200
192800
60000
06000
5 (50
nos)
Fodder Bank
Groundnut
Processing
Total
1643654/-
13
626854/-
Table no. 39: Other activities of watershed works phase Proposed target
Name of
Ridge area
Nursery
Land
Crop
Fodder Land
villages
treatment
raising
development
demonstrations
development
Sr.
(in
(in
(in
(in
(in
Total Estimated cost
No.
ha)
lakh)
ha)
lakh)
(in ha)
lakh)
(in ha)
(in lakh)
(in ha)
(in lakh)
(Rs. In lakhs)
Patan
100
12.50
0.80
564.4
29.91
15
11.19
54.40
Paradava
75
9.35
0.80
424.55
58.63
3.73
72.51
Amrapar
50
6.20
0.40
1016.2
54.12
10
7.46
68.18
Malavada
80
10.61
0.40
136.95
17.27
3.73
32.01
Table no.40: Details of engineering structures in watershed works*

Type of treatment
Executing
Type of land
Target
agency
Estimated cost Expected

Sr.
Village
No.
name
Name of structures
(i)
(ii)
Ridge Drainag
area
e line
(R)
(D)
(iii)
Land
dev. (L)
(i)
Pri-v
ate
(ii)
Commun
ity
(iii)
Others
(pl.
specify)
(i) UG
No. of
(Rs. in lakh)
(ii)SHG
units
year of
(iii)
(No./
completi
Others (pl.
cu.m./
specify)
rmt)
M W O
month &
on
(mm/yyy
y)
Staggered
trenching/Stone
bunding(SCT)
Patan
Earthen Bunds
Waste Weir(5 mt
Length)
Field bunds
(DCF,Teri 100 Ha
1250000
ttorrial)
D
(DCF,Teri
ttorrial)
(DCF,Teri
ttorrial)
6000 rmt
220
(DCF,Teri
70000
ttorrial)
rmt
1425000
2970000
3920000
Gully Plug
Check Dam
Cause Way
(DCF,Teri
ttorrial)
(DCF,Teri
ttorrial)
(DCF,Teri
ttorrial)
300 Nos.
2700000
15
2991700
825000
(DCF,Teri
Percolation Tank
Farm Pond
(DCF,Teri
ttorrial)
Staggered
trenching/Stone
bunding(SCT)
Earthen Bunds
2
Paradava
Waste Weir(5 mt
Length)
Check Dam
(DCF,Teri
ttorrial)
(DCF,Teri
ttorrial)
56000
70 Ha
875000
ttorrial) 2500 rmt
ttorrial)
(DCF,Teri
(DCF,Teri
Field bunds
Gully Plug
0.0
ttorrial)
188
48000
rmt
(DCF,Teri
ttorrial)
(DCF,Teri
70 Nos.
16
593750
2538000
2688000
630000
5148000
ttorrial)
Cause Way
(DCF,Teri
ttorrial)
605000
(DCF,Teri
Percolation Tank
Farm Pond
(DCF,Teri
ttorrial)
Staggered
trenching/Stone
bunding(SCT)
Earthern Bunds
Waste Weir(5 mt
Length)
3
Amrapar
ttorrial)
40000
45 Ha
562500
241
95000
ttorrial)
C
Check Dam
Cause Way
537938
ttorrial) 2265
(DCF,Teri
(DCF,Teri
ttorrial)
(DCF,Teri
(DCF,Teri
Field bunds
Gully Plug
0.0
ttorrial)
rmt
(DCF,Teri
ttorrial)
(DCF,Teri
ttorrial)
(DCF,Teri
ttorrial)
40 Nos.
2889000
5320000
360000
14
5412000
5005000
(DCF,Teri
Percolation Tank
Farm Pond
(DCF,Teri
ttorrial)
Staggered
trenching/Stone
bunding(SCT)
Earthern Bunds
Waste Weir(5 mt
Length)
4
Malavada
P
L
Field bunds
Gully Plug
Check Dam
Cause Way
Percolation Tank
Farm Pond
L
Total
0.0
ttorrial)
(DCF,Teri
ttorrial)
10
80000
60 Ha
750000
(DCF,Teri
2000 rmt
ttorrial)
(DCF,Teri
57
ttorrial)
475000
(DCF,Teri
8500 rmt
ttorrial)
20 Nos.
588000
(DCF,Teri
ttorrial)
(DCF,Teri
ttorrial)
(DCF,Teri
ttorrial)
(DCF,Teri
ttorrial)
1727000
1353000
769500
180000
0.0
3
24000
5,75,38,388/-
Table No. 40.1, Technical Specification of stone bund

Particulars
Value
Units
Top width of bund

Bottom width of Bund
Depth above ground level
Depth of Foundation
Cross section of bund
Proposed Area
0.5
1.3
0.55
0.2
0.68
250.00
Mt.
Mt.
Mt.
Mt.
Sq. M
Ha.
2. Staggered contour Trenches

Over time, experience of watershed programs has shown that it is better to stagger the digging of contour trenches. This is because it has been
found that invariably errors have been made in contouring over long distances. If the contour trench is not level and by mistake sloped, then water
starts to flow from the high point to low point, cutting a path and increasing soil erosion. Therefore instead of making trenches continuous they
should be made in staggered, discontinuous manner. Trenches are any form of depression or micro pit constructed over the land surface in order
to prevent soil erosion and to absorb rainwater in non arable lands. Trenches are constructed along the contours [called contour trenches) on hill
slopes above 15% with vegetative supports for forestry and horticulture land uses. Contour trenches are used both on hill slopes as well as on
degraded and barren waste lands for soil and moisture conservation and afforestation purposes. The trenches break the slope and reduce the
velocity of surface runoff. It can be used in all slopes irrespective of rainfall conditions (i.e. in both high and low rainfall conditions), varying soil
properties. For vegetative supports forage grasses as well as economic trees can be planted. The trenches were working as silt trap earlier.
Periodical maintenance by way of unearthing of the trenches and depositing on the downhill side ought to be given due attention by the
beneficiaries themselves.
Table No. 40.2, Technical Details of Staggered Contour Trenches
Particulars
Trench Length
Value
5.00
Units
Mt.
Trench Width
Trench Depth
No. Of Trenches Per Ha.
0.6
1.0
100
Mt.
Mt.
Nos.
Proposed Area
30.00
Ha.
Table No 40.3, Quantity Calculation

Description
Sr.
Unit No.
No.
1
2
3
Layout of Contour Lines

General Work
Clearing bushes / Dag Belling 2.5 to 5.00 cm deep
Earth Work
Earth work in excavation in foundation/trench upto 1.5 meter depth. Compaction of
Length
Width
Depth
(Mt.)
(Mt.)
(Mt..)
Quantity
Sq.m 30500
5.00
0.6
91500
Sq.m 30500
5.00
0.6
91500
bottom, correction of sides, refilling of blank spaces with soil and disposal of remaining
a) Inupto
ordinary/soft
soil
SOmtr. soil
b) In hard soil/clay/murrum
Cu.m. 30500
5.00
0.6
c) Fragmented rock
d] ordinary rock
Vegetative Work
Sowing of seed on the constructed ridge
Meter 30500
5.00
1.00
91500
152500
5
6
Supply of Tecoma/Alata/Dhaman/Pera Seed @ 4 gm/Meter in two lines

Overseeding of grasses in between two furrows including seed treatment and pallet
making etc. complete @ 8 kg/ha
Kg
Kg
39
2440
39
2440
Table No 40.4 Cost Estimation of Staggered contour trench

Sr. No.
Description
Unit
Quantity
Rate
Amount
@SOR
(Rs.)
(Rs.)
1
2
3
Layout of Contour Lines

General Work
Dag Belling 2.5 to 5.00 cm deep
Earth Work
Earth work in excavation in foundation/trench upto 1.5 meter depth. Compaction of
Sq.m
91500.00
0.25
22875.0
Sq.m
91500.00
1.0
91500.0
Cu.m.
91500.00
41.0
3751500.0
Meter
152500.00
Kg
39
50.0
1950.0
bottom, correction of sides, refilling of blank spaces with soil and disposal of remaining
5
6
soil
SOmtr. soil
a) Inupto
ordinary/soft
b) In hard soil/clay/murrum
c) Fragmented rock
d) ordinary rock
Vegetative Work
Supply of Tecoma/Alata/Dhaman/Pera Seed @ 4 gm/Meter in two lines
Overseeding of grasses in between two furrows including seed treatment and pallet
making etc. complete @ 8 kg/ha
Sub Total
Contigency (0 %)
Supervision Charges (0 %)
Sub Total
Grand Total
3867825/-
Table No 40.4 (A):- Cost Estimation of Staggered contour trench per Village
Sr.no.
Village Name
Area (Ha)
Nos.
Patan
100
10000
Paradava
70
7000
Amrapar
45
4500
Malavada
60
6000
Total
305
27500
Cost
1250000
875000
562500
750000
3437500/-
Table No 40.4 (B):- Cost Estimation of Gully Plug per Village

Sr No
Villagae Name
Gully Plug Nos.
Cost
Patan
300
2700000
Paradava
70
630000
Amrapar
40
360000
Malavada
20
180000
Total
430
3870000/-
3.A Waste Vier for village pond

It was proposed to draw a Waste Vier with the below specification to safe removal of runoff to control soil erosion.
Table No 40.5, Technical Details of Waste Vier

Particulars
Quantity
Unit
Waste Vier Length
10.00
Mt.
Waste Vier Type
Trapezoidal
Waste Vier height form foundation
1.6
Mt.
Waste Vier top Width
1.00
Mt.
Waste Vier Bottom Width
2.0
Mt.
Waste Vier Section
0.9
SqMt.
Table no 40.6, Quantity Calculation of Waste vier (Per Rmt)
Sr.
Description
Unit No. Length
Width
Depth
Quantity
No.
1
Earth Work in excavation in soft soil upto 1.5 m depth and disposing excavated stuff
Cum 1
(Mt.)
1.0
(Mt.)
2.0
(Mt..)
0.5
1 Cum
Cum 1
1.0
2.0
0.5
1 Cum
Cum 1
1.0
2.0
0.1
0.2 Cum
uncoarse rubble masonary in cm 1:5 including racking out joints and finishing curing Cum 1
1.0
2.0
0.9
1.8
upto lead of 50 m.
2
Earth Work in excavation in soft rock upto 1.5 m depth and disposing excavated stuff
upto lead of 50 m.
cc 1:4:8 as a foundation concrete for walls using 40 mm coarse aggregates including

curing compaction etc completed
etc. completed (a) Below GL
uncoarse rubble masonary in cm 1:5 including racking out joints and finishing curing Cum 1
1.0
1.5
0.5
0.75
etc. completed (a) Above GL
Total Masonry quantity
Cum
2.55
cc 1:2:4 as a coping at the top of walls including vibrating finishing curing etc.
Cum 1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
12 mm thick plaster on outer surface of walls in cm 1:3 including racking out joints 20 Sqm 1
1.0
0.65
0.65
0.1
0.1
completed
6
12 mm thick plaster on outer surface of walls in cm 1:3 including racking out joints 20
mm deep, curing finishing etc. completed (a) Body wall to U/S
Sqm
mm deep, curing finishing etc. completed (a) Body wall to D/S

8
Total quantity of plaster
Sqm
1.65
Table no 40.7, Cost Calculation of Waste weir (Per Rmt)

Sr. No. Description
Unit
Quantity
Rate
Amount
@SOR
(Rs.)
(Rs.)
1
2
3
4
Earth Work in excavation in soft soil upto 1.5 m depth and disposing
Cum
Earth Work in excavation in soft rock upto 1.5 m depth and disposing
excavated stuff upto lead of 50 m.
cc 1:4:8 as a foundation concrete for walls using 40 mm coarse aggregates Cum
uncoarse rubble masonary in cm 1:5 including racking out joints and
including curing compaction etc completed
finishing
completed
(a)1:5
Below
GL racking out joints and
uncoarse curing
rubble etc.
masonary
in cm
including
finishing curing etc. completed (a) Above GL
cc 1:2:4 as a coping at the top of walls including vibrating finishing curing Cum
etc. completed
1
1
0.2
41
96
1600
41
96
320
2.55
0.1
1460
2420
3723
242
12 mm thick plaster on outer surface of walls in cm 1:3 including racking Sqm
1.65
78
out joints 20 mm deep, curing finishing etc. completed (a) Body wall to U/S
Sub Total
Contigency (3 %)
Supervision Charges (1.5%)
Sub Total
Grand Total
Say
Total 2.0 nos. of 15 m length for the project. (per Rmt cost 4700/-)
Total cost
128.70
4550.70
136.52
68.26
204.78
4755.48
4700.00
164500
40.8 Details of the waste vier in Patan Project

Sr
Name of
No.
Village
1
2
Activity
Survey No.
Nagbai Talav West Weir

Patan
Estimated Cost
185
70500
Nathubhai Vadi Na Talav No West Weir
94000
Total
164500/-
Table no 40.9, Technical Details of Check Dam

Particulars
Quantity
Unit
Check Dam Length
1.0
Mt.
Check Dam Type
Trapezoidal
Check Dam height form foundation
1.5
Mt.
Check Dam top Width
1.0
Mt.
Check Dam Bottom Width
2.0
Mt.
Check Dam apron length
Mt.
Check Dam apron width
Mt.
Check Dam apron depth
Mt.
Check Dam Section
2.25
SqMt.
Table no. 40.10, Quantity Calculation of Check dam (Per Rmt)

Sr. No.
Description
Unit
No.
Length (Mt.) Width (Mt.)
Depth
Quantity
Cum
1.0
2.0
(Mt..)
0.5
1 Cum
excavated stuff upto lead of 50 m. for body wall

Cum
1.0
2.0
0.5
1 Cum
excavated stuff upto lead of 50 m. for apron

Total quantity
Cum
Cum
1.0
2.0
0.5
1 Cum
excavated stuff upto lead of 50 m. for body wall

Cum
1.0
2.0
0.5
1 Cum
excavated stuff upto lead of 50 m. for apron

Total quantity
Cum
cc 1:4:8 as a foundation concrete for walls using 40 mm coarse aggregates
Cum
1.0
2.0
0.1
0.2 Cum
Cum
1.0
2.0
0.1
0.2 Cum
including curing compaction etc completed for body wall

cc 1:4:8 as a foundation concrete for walls using 40 mm coarse aggregates
including curing compaction etc completed for appron
Total quantity
Cum
Cum
finishing curing etc. completed (a) Below GL

Appron
0.4 Cum
1
1.0
2.0
0.9
1.8
2.0
0.8
1.60
Cum

Toe wall
5
1.0
1.5
1.4
2.1
1.0
0.5
0.45
0.23
Cum
5.73
cc 1:2:4 as a coping at the top of walls including vibrating finishing curing etc. Cum
1.0
1.0
0.1
0.1
completed (a) body wall

(b) Appron
1.0
1.5
0.1
0.15
1.0
0.5
0.1
0.05
(c) Toe wall

Total
6
12 mm thick plaster on outer surface of walls in cm 1:3 including racking out
1.0
1.8
1.8
12 mm thick plaster on outer surface of walls in cm 1:3 including racking out Sqm
1.0
1.65
1.65
joints 20 mm deep, curing finishing etc. completed (b) Body wall to D/S
(c) Toe wall
1.0
0.45
0.90
joints 20 mm deep, curing finishing etc. completed (a) Body wall to U/S
0.30
Total quantity of plaster
40.11 Cost Calculation for Check Dam
Sqm
Sqm
4.35
Sr. No.
Description
Unit
Quantity
Rate
Amount
@SOR
(Rs.)
(Rs.)
1
Cum
41
82
96
192
0.4
1600
640
5.73
1460
8365.80
0.3
2420
726
4.35
78
339.30

2


etc. completed
6

out joints 20 mm deep, curing finishing etc. completed
Sub Total
10345.10
Contigency (3 %)
310.35
155.18
Sub Total
465.53
Grand Total
10810.63
Say
11000
40.12 Details of the Check Dam in Patan Project

Sr
Name of
No.
Village
Patan
Activity
Check Dam-1 Andhariya Nesh(Near Jetha

Ukas Farm)
Check Dam -2 Andhariya Nesh(Near Bhikha

Ukas Farm)
Check Dam-1Bochavadi Nesh(Across

Kothavala Vokada)
Check Dam-2Bochavadi Nesh(Across

Kothavala Vokada)
Check Dam Near Harsha Jaliya

Nesh(Savdashbhais Farm)
Check Dam Near Savdashbhai

farm(Govarakhi Nesh)
Survey No.
179, 180,182,183
165,181
173,174,175,176
173,174,175,176,177,179
166/p3,166/p1
68,61,63,58,59
Estimated Cost
165000
198000
110000
110000
495000
165000
Check Dam Near Budha Bhura Farm(Vadali

Nesh)
Check Dam Near Bhagabhai Harubhai

Bariya Farm (Govrakhi Nesh)
Check Dam Near Gogan Devarkhi Farm

(Chapal Iae Nesh)
10
Check Dam on Malavada River (Chapal Iae

Nesh)
11
Check Dam-1 Near Hamirbhai Jetabhai

Farm (Ganga Jalliya Nesh)
12
Check Dam-2 in Hathi Paga Area (Ganga

Jalliya Nesh)
13
Check Dam-3 Near Dharu Zarukh Vali Dhar

(Ganga Jalliya Nesh)
14
Check Dam in Ambaliya Dhar (Near Nirama

Leas)
110,112,113,109/p1,
29/p2,29/p3,42,43,
58,58/p2,59,60,61
29,30/p1,2,31,34
185/p,114,119
185/p,119
185,185/p,117,199
18/p1 to 18/p9,19/p1 to 19/p9,20,21,22
Total
1
Paradava
Checkdam-1Near Keshu Rama Farm

(Humiya Dhar )
Checkdam-2 Near Keshu Rama Farm
260,261,262,263,264,266
260,261,262,263,264,266
220000
330000
605000
165000
110000
176000
110000
132000
2991700
550000
330000
(Humiya Dhar Shelu)

3
Chaeckdam-3 Near Chana Rama Farm

(Humiya Dhar )
Checkdam-4 Near Chana Rama Farm

(Humiya Dhar )
Check Dam-1 Near Natha Meraman Farm

(Bhakhar Aata Galo )
Check Dam-2 Near Lakhanshi Fora Farm

(Bhakhar Aata Galo )
Check Dam-1Near Bhatu Saheb Farm North

Side (Bhediya Dhar)
Check Dam-2 Near Bhatu Saheb Farm

North Side (Bhediya Dhar)
Check Dam Near Ghela Mohan Koli Farm

(Amrapar Paradava Road)
10
Check Dam Near Lakhmanbhai Bachubhai
260,261,262,263,264,266
260,261,262,263,264,266
260,261,262,263,264,266
260,261,262,263,264,266
140,148
140,148
44,45,273,274,277,278,278/p1,p16
253000
385000
660000
462000
550000
715000
198000
269,270,273
308000
174,175,177
198000
210,212,215
220000
Farm(Paradava-Amrapar Approch Road)

11
Check Dam in Vidi Dhar Valo Vokado

(Samat Abhu Farm)
12
Check Dam Near Deva Veja farm (Tekari

Valo Galo)
13
Check Dam Near Devabhai Patabhai
14
Check Dam-1Ubera Valo Vokalo (Suka

Jodha Farm)
19,20,21
176,177
220000
198000
15
Check Dam-2 Ubera Valo Vokalo
177,178
220000
16
177,178,179
242000
17
177,178,179
154000
Total
5863000
30,55,72,73,74,75
440000
1
2
Amrapar
Dhuniya Valo Area

Check Dam-1 Zil Pat Vokaro(Mulu Oghad
Khunti)
Check Dam-2 Zil Pat Vokaro(Khima Sajan)
Check Dam-3 Zil Pat Vokaro(Sarkari

Kharabo)
Check Dam Across Vagadiya Pir Vokaro
Check Dam -1Across Suliya Vokaro(Malde
30,55,56,72,74,75
14,30,55,73,75
15,16,17
74,75
330000
275000
275000
242000
134,175,485
330000
134,175,485
330000
Kana Farm)
7
Check Dam -1Across Suliya Vokaro(Viram

Karu Farm)
Check Dam-1 Keshubhai Samat

Modhavadiya(Malar Vokaro)
381,386,388,389
440000
Check Dam-2 Bhima Samat

Modhavadiya(Malar Vokaro)
380,381,382,383,386,389
385000
10
Check Dam-3 Jetha Jogal(Malar Vokaro)
380,381,382,383,386,389
275000
11
Check Dam on Dudhara Vokaro
141,142,465/p85,482,483
660000
12
Check Dam on Vala Vav Vokaro
465/p1/9/10/12/17,483
770000
13
Check Dam-1 on Shel no Vokaro(Lakhabhai

Vastabhai)
14
Check Dam-2 on Shel no Vokaro(Keshu

Saheb)
1
2
Malavada
364/p1,361
361,364,365,366,367
385000
275000
Total
5412000
Check Dam on Gandiya Pir Valo Vokaro
35/p West Land
275000
Check Dam on Sumiya Dhuna Valo Vokaro
35/p West Land
242000
1,
220000
51,53,64,65
275000
51,53,64,65
220000
47,51,53,54,64
220000
(Bala Karashan)
3
Check Dam Near Suga Devarkhi Farm
Check Dam-1 Near Haji Pir Vali

Tekari(Right Side)
Check Dam-2 Near Haji Pir Vali Tekari(Left

Side)
Check Dam-3 Near Haji Pir Vali

Tekari(Near HajiPir Darga)
Check Dam Bandhel Gali No Vokaro
10,11,12,13,17,19,15
275000
Total
1727000
Table no 40.13 Technical Details of Cause way

Particulars
Quantity
Unit
Cause way Length
1.0
Mt.
Cause way Type
Rectangle
Cause way height form foundation
2.0
Mt.
Cause way top Width
4.5
Mt.
Cause way Bottom Width
4.5
Mt.
Cause way Section
9.0
SqMt.
Table no. 40.14 Quantity Calculation of Cause way (Per Rmt)
Sr. No. Description
Earth Work in excavation in soft soil upto 1.5 m depth and
Unit
No.
Cum
Length
Width
Depth
Quantity
(Mt.)
(Mt.)
(Mt..)
1.0
1.0
0.5
disposing excavated stuff upto lead of 50 m. long walls
Earth Work in excavation in soft rock upto 1.5 m depth and Cum
1.0
1.0
0.5
Cum
1.0
1.0
0.1
0.2 Cum
Cum
1.0
2.5
0.1
0.25
disposing excavated stuff upto lead of 50 m. for long walls

3
cc 1:4:8 as a foundation concrete for walls using 40 mm

coarse aggregates including curing compaction etc completed
for long walls
cc 1:4:8 as a foundation concrete for walls using 40 mm
coarse aggregates including curing compaction etc completed
for bed
Total quantity
Cum
uncoarse rubble masonary in cm 1:5 including racking out
Cum
0.45 Cum
2
1.0
1.0
1.80
3.60
2.50
0.60
1.5
joints and finishing curing etc. completed for walls

Bed
Cum
cc 1:2:4 as a coping at the top of walls including vibrating
Cum
finishing curing etc. completed (a) body wall
5.10
1
1.0
4.5
0.2
0.9
12 mm thick plaster on outer surface of walls in cm 1:3
1.0
1.5
including racking out joints 20 mm deep, curing finishing etc. Sqm

completed (a) Body wall to U/S
40.15 Cost Calculation for Cause way

Sr. No. Description
Unit
Quantity
Rate
Amount
@SOR
(Rs.)
(Rs.)
1
Cum
41
41
96
96
0.45
1600
720
5.1
1460
7446

2


0.9
2420
2178
78
234
etc. completed
6

out joints 20 mm deep, curing finishing etc. completed
Sub Total
10715
Contigency (3 %)
321.45
160.725
Sub Total
482.17
Grand Total
11197.17
Say
Total 13 nos. of 30 m length for the project. (per Rmt cost 11000/-)
Total cost
11000.00
6688000.00
40.16 Details of the Cause Way in Patan Project

Sr
Name of
No.
Village
Patan
Activity
Cause Way Near Bochavadi Nesh

Pankhera Nadi Par Cause Way(Pankhera
Nesh)
Survey No.
Estimated Cost
175,176
330000
29/p2,29/p3,31/p1,2,31,34,36
495000
Gala Valo Vokaro Cause Way (Mahiki
137,141/p1,142,143,144/p2
Road)
Total
1
Paradava
Cause Way Cum Check Dam on Prashala
99,98,113,114,119,125,126
Road (Near Karashan Menand)
Total
1
159,160/2,160/p1,166,211,207,211,212
Amrapar
198000
825000/605000
605000/1210000
Cause Way Cum Check Dam Dolar

Talav(Kutiyana Amrapar Road)
Cause Way Cum Check on Timbli Dhar Valo 138/1,138/2,154,148,145,147
275000
Vokaro
3
Cause Way Cum Check Dem-1on Pata Valo
99,100,101,129,132,133
990000
99,133,134,165,174,175
990000
Vokaro(Near Malde Kana Farm)

4
Cause Way Cum Check Dem-1on Pata Valo

Vokaro(Near Samsan)
Cause Way Cum Check Dem on Dhun Khan
30,55,72,73,74,75
Vistar(Kutiyana-Amrapar Road)
6
Cause Way Cum Check Near Jadav Raja
157,218,216,158
Farm(Dhun Khan Area)
Total
1
Malavada
Cause Way on Prashala Na Marge(Jiva
26/p,35/p
440000
1100000
5005000/660000
Karana)
2
Cause Way Cum Check Dem on Prashala
35/p Gam Tal
253000
27,28,29
275000
36/p1 To 36/p5,37/p2
165000
Total
1353000/-
Na Marge(Muru Naja)
3
Cause Way Cum Check Dem(Dudhala Valo

Vokaro) Near Punja Karshan farm
Cause Way Cum Check Dem(Near Natha

Nungha Farm)
Table No 40.17. Repairing & Dislting Check Dam
Sr No.
1
Village Name
Patan
Activity
Repairing & Dislting of Khodiyar
Check Dam
Deepnning & Dislting of Near
Near Ram Bhai Dayabhai Farm
Karabhai Vasabhai Farm(Govarakhi
Deepnning
& Dislting of Near
Nesh)
Savdashbhai Farm(Govarakhi Nesh

Deepnning & Dislting of Vadali Nesh
(Gat Valo Check Dam

Ramabhai Dadhi Farm (Nadi Valo

Detailed Project Report IWMP-1Area)
(Patan )
Survey No.
137,141/p1,142,143,144/p2
Cost
50000
65,66,67
85000
61,62,63
80000
110,112,113,109/p1
45000
185/p
50000
52,58,193
65000
100,101,120,128
65000
Merkhibhai Farm(Chapal I Nesh)

7

Rajabhai Odedara Farm
Total
440000/-
Slope treatment:
The second tier treatment is the slope treatment, This is generally agricultural land or waste lands.Thse are generally water conservation or
surface water storage structures. These being highly labour intensive will involve more of manual labour so schemes like National Rural
Employment Guarantee Scheme (NREGS) can be taken.
Following structures are been proposed in these areas
1. Earthen Bund
2. Waste Weir
3. Afforestation
Earthen Bund
Table no 40.18 Technical details of Earth Bund No.l
Particulars
Value
Structure Length
1000
Mt.
Structure Height
1.5
Mt.
Upstream Slope
2:1
Downstream Slope
1:1
Bund Top Width
1.0
Mt.
Structure Base Width
6.00
Mt.
Structure Cross Section
5.25
SqMt.
Table no 40.19, Quantity Calculation of Earth Bund No.l

Sr. No. Description
Unit
No. of
Length
Width
Height/depth Quantity
Structures (Mt)
1
General Work
Clearing bushes / Dag Belling 2.5 to 5.00 cm deep Mt
Earth Work
1000
6000 sq.m
Cu.M 1
1000
3.5(Avg) 1.5
5250 Cu. M
a) ordinary soil
Cum 1
1000
3.5(Av
5250 Cu. M
b) hard soil
Cum
Construction of earthen bund (dry of moist)

excavation and laying in 15 cm layer, breaking of
clods,
separating leaves and small stones, dressing and
compaction with sheep foot roller or hand
rammer,
upto 1.5 meter lift and 50 meter lead.
1.5
Table No, 40.20, Cost Estimation of Earth Bund No.l

SR. NO. Description
Unit
Rate
Amount
(Rs.)
(Rs.)
General Work
2.
Quantity
Sq.m
6000
12000
Cum
5250
41
215250
Earth Work
Construction of earthen bund (dry of moist) excavation and laying in 15 cm
layer, breaking of clods, separating leaves and small stones, dressing and
compaction with sheep foot roller or hand rammer, uptp 1.5 meter lift and 50
meter lead.
a) ordinary soil
b) hard soil
3
Sub Total
Contigency
Supervision Charges
227250
(in 3 %)
(in 1.5 %)
6817
3400
Sub Total
10217
Grand Total
237467
40.21 Details of the Earthen Bund / Earthen Embankment in Patan Project

Sr
Name of
No.
Village
Activity
Earthen Bund Near Harshakh
Survey No.
Estimated Cost
166,166/p1,166/p3,165
356250
165,166,166/p1,166/p3
356250
141,142,
237500
137,138,141
237500
143,144,1149,150
237500
Dungar(Batha Uka)
2
Earthen Bund Near Harshali Dungar(Bijal

Deva)
Patan
Earthen Bund Near Rambhai Dayabhai

Farm(Mahiki Road)
Earthen Bund Near Virambhai Karanabhai
Farm (Mahiki Road)
Earthen Bund Near Sodha Indubha

Bhavansing
Total
1
Earthen Bund Near Sanjaybhai Odedara
1425000/-
103,59,60,59/p1,2,3
118750
,6,7,8/p2,12,13,40,39/p1,
237500
1,2,3,30,39,41, 270,271
237500
Farm(Bhediyadhar)
2
Paradava
Earthen Bund Near Laxmanbhai

Bachubhai(Dudhala Road)
Earthen Bund Near Seta
Dungar(Paradava-Amrapar Road)
Total
593750/-
Upla Katha na Vokara Vala Talav Earthen
69,70,71,72,78,79,81,82,119
62938
74,75,76,77,218,216,165,166
237500
100,128,465/p,78,124,125,126
237500
Embankment
2
Amrapar
Earthen Bund Near Keshubhai

Modhavadiya
Earthen Bund Near Malar Vokara(Seta
Dungar)
Earthen Bund Near Malavada Gingani

Malavada
Total
537938/-
21,22
237500
37/p1,36/p1
237500
Road(Deviben Samat Charan,Jiva Samat)

Earthen Bund Near Hun no Nesh(Punja
Natha Farm)
Total
475000/-
/-
Table no.41: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works
Sr.
Name of
Name of structure/
No.
village
work
Type of treatment
Type of land
Executing
agency
Target
(i) UG
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
Ridge Drainage Land

area
line
dev.
(R)
(D)
(L)
(i)
(ii)
Private Community
(iii)
(ii)SHG
Others
(iii)
(pl.
Others
specify)
(pl.
Expected
Area No. of
(ha)
plants
Estimated
cost
Rs.
specify)
Afforestation
Patan
Forest
12
Forest
Fodder
SHG
Nursery raising
Seeding(SCT,BCT)
13332
Plantation/Grass
Paradava Seeding(SCT,BCT)
Fodder
10000
May-2012
17
1268200
Jan-2012
120000
May-2012
3096596/-
Forest
Forest
4.1
SHG
5555
707665
May-2013
8200
May-2012
373000
Jan-2012
80000
May-2012
Total
Afforestation
Amrapar
Plantation/Grass
Seeding(SCT,BCT)
Fodder
(mm/
May-2013
Nursery raising
completion
1698396
Total
Afforestation
year of
yyyy)
Plantation/Grass
month &
1168865/-
Forest
3333
424599
Forest
8.5
17000
10
746000
May-2013
May-2012
Jan-2012
Nursery raising
SHG
40000
Total
Afforestation
Plantation/Grass
Malavada Seeding(SCT,BCT)
Fodder
Nursery raising
1227599/-
Forest
Forest
0.85
SHG
Total
Table No, 41.1, Technical Details of Horticulture Activities ( Area 1 Ha per village)
424599
May-2013
1700
May-2012
373000
Jan-2012
40000
May-2012
5493060/-
Horticulture Plantation:
Crop Name
Plant To Plant Spacing
Row to Row Spacing
Pit Length
Pit Width
Pit Depth
No. of Plants
Plantation Area
No. of Plants per ha
Plants for Gap Filling
Total Nos of plants
3333
839299/-
Grand Total
Particulars
Value
Mango/Sapota/Chiku
8.00
8.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
156
1
156
374
2246
May-2012
mt
mt
mt
mt
mt
Nos.
Ha.
Nos.
20 %
No.
Table No, 41.2, Cost Estimation for Horticulture activity

Sr. No.
Description
No.
Lengt
Width
Depth
Unit
Quantity
Rate
Amount
Digging of pits for plants in Ordinary murum
156
h(m.)
1
(m.)
1
(m.)
1
Cum
156.00
41
6396
Plants saplings for plantation in Govt. pasture area,sapling not less
156
Nos.
156.00
100
15600
3
4
than 30 cm. height

Transportation of plants from nursery to camp site upto 5Km
Loading and unloading of plants
156
156
Nos.
Nos.
156.00
156.00
LS
LS
1500
800
Cost of fertiliser & insecticides incl. application
156
Nos.
156.00
10
1560
Weeding and Hoeing two times (Twice in year]
156
Nos.
156.00
312
Irrigation Facility (Drip/Bore)

Total
Nos.
LS
30000
56168
56000
Say
SR No.
Village Name
Horticulture Area
Estimation Cost
(Ha)
1
Patan
Paradava
Amrapar
Malavada
Total
168000
112000
168000
56000
504000/-
Farm Pond :
There is very little qualitative difference between a pond/ tank, which usually serves the population of a village, and farm pond, which serves an
individual agricultural field. Farms ponds greatly vary in size depending upon the rainfall. These have only a few metres of length and width and
are built across the flow path of natural drainage channels. Surplus water from one pond spills over to a lower pond. In some cases a series of farm
ponds are built on one single stream. Each pond caters to the irrigation needs of one farm and also augments ground water recharge.
Table No, 41.3 Technical Details of Farm Pond 1

Particulars
Pond Length
Pond Width
Pond Depth
Side Slope
Quantity
10
10
2
1:1
Unit
Mt.
Mt
Mt.
Table No, 41.4, Quantity Excavation for Farm Pond 1

Sr No Description
Unit
Pond Top
Pond Bottom
Area fSq.m) Area (Sq.m)

1
2
General Work
Earth Work
Construction of earthen bund (dry of moist) excavation and laying in 15 cm layer,
Sq. m.
100
Sq.m
100
Dept h Quantity
(M)
100
36
2.0
160
breaking of clods, separating leaves and small stones, dressing and compaction with
sheep
foot roller
a)
ordinary
soil or hand rammer, uptp 1.5 meter lift and 50 meter lead.
b) hard soil
For 25 no. of farm ponds
Cum
Cum
Cum
160
4000
Table No, 41.5, Cost Estimation of Farm pond No.1

Sr. No. Description
1
2
Unit
Quantity
Rate (Rs.) Amount

(Rs.)
General Work
Mt
Earth Work
Construction of earthen bund (dry of moist) excavation and laying in 15 cm layer, breaking
100
20.00
2000
41.00
96.00
6560
15360
6560
196.80
98.40
6855.52
Say
6900/-
160
of clods, separating leaves and small stones, dressing and compaction with sheep foot roller
or ordinary
hand rammer,
a)
soil uptp 1.5 meter lift and 50 meter lead.
b) hard soil
Sub Total
Contingency (3 %)
Supervision Charges (1.5 %]
Sub Total
Grand Total
Cum
Cum
160
160
Table No, 41.6, Cost of Farm pond in Village Wise:Sr No.
Village Name
Nos. Of Pond
Cost
Patan
56000
Paradava
40000
Amrapar
10
80000
Malavada
24000
25
200000/-
Total
Plains or Flat level:

These is at field level of farmers where farmers are operating at a very high labour intensive way. These generally field bunding , crop pattern alteration.
The prime aim is to conserve the rain in the field
Table No, 41.7 Technical Details of Farm Bund

Particulars
Value
Bund Length Per Ha.
400
Mt.
Proposed Area fare of farm)
1.00
Ha.
Total Bund Length For Proposed Area(for whole project)
174500
Mt.
Top Width
0.50
Mt.
Side Slope
1.0
:0.75
Height
1.0
Mt
Base Width
2.0
Mt.
Cross-Section of Farm bund
1.25
Sq Mt.
Table No, 41.8, Quantity Excavation for Farm bund

Sr.
No
1
2
Description
Unit
Quantity
Cum
218125
Mt
Kg
174500
698
General Work
Earth Work
Construction of earthen bund (dry of moist) excavation and laying in 15 cm layer, breaking of clods, separating leaves
and small stones, dressing and compaction with sheep foot roller or hand rammer, uptp 1.5 meter lift and 50 meter
3
4
a)
ordinary soil
lead.
b) hard soil
Vegetative Work
Supply of Stylo/Dhaman Seed @ 4gm/mt in(single line)
Table No. 41.9 Cost Estimation of Farm Bund No.l

Sr. No.
1
2
Description
Unit
General Work
Earth Work
Construction of earthen bund (dry of moist) excavation and laying in 15 cm layer, breaking Cum
Quantity
Rate
Cum
218125
41.00
Mt
Kg
174500
2.0
698
50
Amount
of clods, separating leaves and small stones, dressing and compaction with sheep foot roller
4
5
6
or ordinary
hand rammer,
a)
soil uptp 1.5 meter lift and 50 meter lead.
b) hard soil
Vegatative Work
Supply of Stylo/Dhaman Seed @ 4gm/mt infsingle line)
Sub Total
Contigency (3 %)
Supervision Charges (1.5 %)
Sub Total
Grand Total
Say
Table No. 41.10 Cost Estimation of Farm Bund For Every Village
Sr no.
Village
Farm Bund Length
Cost
Patan
70000
3920000
Paradava
48000
2688000
Amrapar
95000
5320000
Malavada
10500
588000
Total
174500
11956000/-
8943125
349000
34900
9327000
279810
139905
9746715
9746715
9746000/-
41.11 Details of Forestry Plantation (Afforastration)

Sr. No.
Item of work
Qty.
Labour
Material Total
1333
2929
2929
1333
2960
2960
2960
2929
5889
2122
345
2467
5082
3274
8356
1. Nursery
a
Cost of container, soil, manure, seed, water,

fertilizer, insecticide, rent of lands, shade etc.
Labour: preparation of beds, filling and

arranging of bags, sowing of seeds, watering,
shifting, weeding etc.
Total (a+b)
c
Maintenance of seedling, watering, shifting
1333
and grading insecticide harmones etc from

April to July
Total (a +b +c)
2. Area Development
a
Selection of site, survey and preparation
1111
155
155
cleaning of site
1111
426
426
Alignment & digging of pits (45 cm X45cm
1111
7511
7511
X45cm)
Remark
Total of 2.
8092
8092
15000
60000
75000
15000
60000
75000
3. Protection
a
Fencing by Barbed wire (600 Rmt/Ha)
1111
Total of 3
4. Current Year
Planting and cultural Operation
a
Raising of seedling casulity @ 20%
222
493
488
981
Transport of seedling including casuality
1333
800
533
1333
1111
141
266
407
Replacement
c
Application of DAP 10 gm. pit and insecticide

before planting
Planting with Khamna
1111
2201
2201
First weeding cum soil working
1111
1889
1889
Second weeding cum soil working
1111
1444
1444
Third weeding cum soil working
1111
1778
1778
Fertilizer Support watering 4 times
1111
7999
13332
13332
Repairs of fence & fire protection
1111
3447
240
3687
Misellaneous (Signage, Photographs etc)
1111
500
500
20192
7360
27552
353
57
410
Total of 4
5. First year cultural operation
a
Maintenance of casulity seedlings for casulity
222
@ 20% from April to july

b
Casulity replacement transport & planting
222
728
728
First weeding cum soil working
1111
1889
1889
Second weeding cum soil working
1111
1444
1444
fertilizer and support watering 3 times
1111
5999
4000
9999
watch and ward
1111
3447
240
3687
13860
4297
18157
Total of 5
6. Second year cultural operation
a
One weeding cum soil working
1111
1889
1889
Repairs of fence and fire protection
111
2487
2487
Total of 6
4376
4376
Grant Total of 1 to 6
66602
74931
141533
Village Wise Afforastration

Sr. No
Village Neme
Patan
No. of Unit
12
Per unit cost
Total cost
141533
1698396
Paradava
141533
Amrapar
141533
Malavada
141533
Total
23
707665
424599
424599
3255259/-
Livelihood Intervention
Production system -1: Potato wafers production
Introduction:
In Gujarat, Banaskatha, Vadodara, Kheda, Mehasana, Jamnagar and Kachha districts have good production of Potato crop. Now a days potato
wafers become popular in cities as well as in rural areas. During the production season of potato it costs around Rs 5000 to 6000/- per tone. In this
business raw material of potato and vegetative oil is most important products.
Procedure for potato wafers:

1.
Raw material: Potato should be of same size, mostly round and it should not have any disease or any whole on it. Material must be neat
2.
and clean.
3.
Classification: Grading should be done by manually or by machine to get single type of disease less potato.
4.
Cleaning: As per need potato should be washed in running water to clean dust on it.
5.
Removal of upper surface: The upper surface may get remove by manually or by machine, it need to maintain proper and continuous
pressure of water. Afeter this process potato should be sink in water having mixture of 0.1 % of Sodium sulfide or Sodium meta bisulfide
for further procedure.
6.
Trimming: Once again material is to be scanned for removal of bad material by manually, it is known as trimming
7.
Slicing: Slice of potato is to be done by using slicer or striper or if man power is more then it may be done by local instrument also.
8.
Watering: After slice it should be washed 2 -3 times by clean water and then remove starch on it by putting it over
9.
Hydro Extraction : To remove extra amount of water, Hydro extraction of slice is to be done by putting it over cloths on open space.
10.
Frying: Hydro extracted and dry potato slices is to be fried in good vegetative oil
Cost Estimation of Potato Wafers

Sr. No.
Item
Number
Cost
Instruments
Potato pilling machine with 1 HP single motor
15000
potato wafer cutting machine with 1 hp single motor
18000
Dehydrator machine with 1 hp single motor
20000
Burner fiber (gas stove), valve bloar take pipe line along with all
20000
Aluminum fipan (Tavi)
8000
Weights
4000
accessory.
Electrification installation
Sealing machine for packing
4000
1
5000
Office furniture
10000
Raw material of potato, vegetable oil, plastic bags for packing
30000
Salary and power expenditure
6000
Repair/maintenance
800
Rent of building
1000
Total
141200
Total expenditure for one month: Rs 31800/Total Production in one month: Use 100 kg raw material of potato it gives 25 kg wafer daily. So monthly production of wafers is 750 kg.
Cost of wafer per kg is Rs 70/- So total selling cost of wafer= 750 X 70 = 52500/Detailed Project Report IWMP-1 (Patan )
Net profit = Total sell- total expenditure= 52500 31800 = 20700/-.
Production System-2: Papad Making

For women to become a successful entrepreneur, she needs access to capital, technical and managerial know-how and market. The essence to
empower rural women lies in catalyzing appropriate economic activities at the grass root level and creating new opportunities for them to earn
higher income in order ton improve their standard of living. This objective could be accomplished by establishing enterprises that are based on the
locally available resources and preferably indigenous knowledge. Self Help Groups (SHG), each with 10-20 members, will be motivated and
proper training will be provided for each micro enterprise activity which will improve the quality of their own lives as well as the lives of those
around them.
Introduction
Papad is delicious snack. It is consumed at homes, restaurants, hotels, etc. Papad is a traditional item consumed in all functions.
Traditionally this activity was confined to household papad making but in view of increasing demand and availability of machinery
(mechanisation) it has now been developed in cottage and small scale sector. Enterprise can be started by 2 family members and optimum
machinery.
Market
Field survey findings indicated that papad industry has good potential in big centers in cities like Gondal and Jetpur of Rajkot areas. There
is a good demand for papads because it is a food product and commonly consumed commodity in all households and hotels. Women entrepreneurs
can gainfully take up this papad/Khakhra unit in their houses but proper packing and distribution network is necessary to sell in bulk quantities.
Manufacturing Process
Generally weighed quantity of floor is taken in a mixer. A solution of common salt and carbonates is added in requisite quantity of water
and the contents are kneaded at maximum speed to get a homogenous lump of the dough. After resting the dough for 30 minutes, it is divided into
balls. These are pressed into circular discs. Corn starch can be used as dusting material to prevent stickiness. The papads are usually dried. After
drying, it is packed in various size packing. Lot of 25 or 50 papads is then packed in polythene bags. Papad can be manufactured from different
varieties of pulses or there could be a combination of pulses as well. Ingredients required for Papad making are Black gram, oil, sodium carbonate,
flour of Arhar dal.
Process flow chart of Papad making

Dough formation from various ingredients
Making small balls from dough
Pressing
Sun Drying
Sealing and Packing
Production Capacity
Monthly approximately 1000 Kg papad/khakhra and other foods product activity can be produced.
Static Capital Investments:
A) Land/Infrastructure :
A person can start his activity in his own house by using Approx. 575 Sq. Ft. carpet area.
Sr.
No.
B)
1
2
3
4
Particular
Nos.
Plant/Machinery/Instruments etc.
Flour Mill with electric motor
Set for foods product making
Other instruments
Installation, foundation etc.
Total : C)
1
D)
E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Office Furniture etc.

Cup board/kitchen stand
kitchen wares and gas connection other etc.
Capital Investment
Raw Material
marketing and exposure visite and related activity
Total : -(C+D)
Grand Total :- (B+D)
Transport to food product / marketing /vehicles other etc
Production Cost (Monthly)
Raw Material
Power fuel charge
Packing
Maintenance & Storage etc.
House Rent
Others
Price (Rs.)
60000.00
35000.00
15000.00
15000.00
125000.00
10000.00
25000.00
15000.00
15000.00
65000.00
190000.00
150000.00
50000.00
4000.00
15000.00
3000.00
500.00
5500.00
Total : -
68000.00
Total Production (Monthly)

1. Papad 1000 Kg X Rs. 90/Kg
90000
Cost Benefit Ratio (Monthly)

Monthly Selling income
90000
Production Cost
68000
Total monthly income will be Rs. 22000 /-
-----------22000
The unit can be taken up by landless, small farmer and land with limited farm labour, thus making it most suitable to the project villages, and the
scheme will be taken up in such a manner that there should be no marketing problem, as they will be consumed directly by the near by villages or
cities. Training will be provided to the beneficiaries and the content is shown below
Training Content
A. Theoretical
Introduction to different types of papad / khakhra and other food..
Tools and Equipments used in papad / khakhra and other food..
Dough making - variations in shapes, size, and flavour.
The processes involved in papads / khakhra and other food..
The hygiene aspects associated with food products.
Market development.
Addresses of the suppliers of raw materials, & packaging materials.
B. Practical
Raw materials for papad / khakhra and other food.. the quality and variety.
Introduction to the machinery and equipments used. Dough making and the value addition in the form of flavours.
Bringing about variations in shapes and sizes.
Papad & Chips making Practical
Drying and preservation
Cost considerations and waste reduction.
Pricing & packaging
Production System-3: Chilly powder packing

Introduction:
Gujarat state is the second largest state in the production of chilly, 14 districts of Gujarat produces chilly thus raw material will be readily
available for the proposed unit. The production of spices is likely to increase in the coming years with irrigation facility made available through
Narmada Canal System.
Sr. No.
Item
Number/Quantity
Cost
Micro Pulverizer along with electric motor
70000
Electric breaker with motor
25000
Sealing machine
2500
Weighing balance
2000
Furniture
8000
Raw Material (Dry Chilly)
600 kg/month
50000
Salary
2 employ
3000
Electrification
1500
Repairing/ Maintenance
1000
Total
163000/-
Revenue and return details:
Sr.
Return Details
Cost
Total cost for Chilly powder
163000/-
Monthly Material requirement and labour charges (600 kg)
50000
Labour charges
2000
Net selling price (Rs 130/- per Kg )
78000/-
Net profit
26000/-
No.
Production System-4: Groundnut, Horse gram, Poha preparation

Introduction:
Now a days Groundnut, Horse gram become a regular snacks thing
Sr. No.
Item
Number
Cost
Electric Bloor with chimney (10 HP)
20000
Bhatti
2000
Iron pot (Can)
2500
Other pots
Weighing Balance
Electrification
Raw Material (Horsegram, Groundnut, Poha)
Packing
Salary
10
Repairing/Mentenance
600
Total
59350
10000
1
2500
2000
200 Kg
14000
750
2000
Say
60000/-

Sr. No.
Return Details
Cost
Total cost for Groundnut, Horse gram preparation
60000
Monthly Material requirement and labour charges (200 kg)
14000
Labour charges
2000
Monthly maintenance, fuel charge
1000
Net selling price (Rs 110/- per Kg )
22000
Net profit
5000/-
Production System-: Washing soap and detergent powder

Introduction:
Washing soap and detergent powder is the used every house daily. The raw material of washing soap and detergent powder comes from acid
slurry of petroleum products such as C. M. C. acid slurry, sodium silicate etc. Day to day use of synthetic clothes are getting increasing due to this
the use of detergent powder is also increasing.
Production capacity:
The production of washing soap may ranges around 100 kg/day and that of detergent powder is around 70 kg/day.
Sr. No.
Item
Number/Quantity
Cost
Soap making machine
12500
Soap cutting machine
3500
Different types of mould
5000
Iron pan having capacity of 150 kg
7000
weighing balance
4000
Iron plates, bowls, tray, plastic tub, etc
6500
Detergent powder machine
17000
Oven
Raw material, costic soda, sodium silicate, acid slurry, sodium sulphate,
5000
45000
colour, sent, electric expenditure etc

Total
105500/-

Sr. No.
Return Details
Cost
Raw material
30000
Labour charges
3000
electric bill
350
Packing
800
Depreciation cost
450
Sub total
34600/-
cost of 2500 kg Washing soap with Rs 11 per Kg
27000
Cost of 1700 kg detergent powder with Rs 9 per Kg
15300
Total Income
42300/-
10
Net profit (9-6)
7700/-
Production System-: Stitching and Bharat work

Introduction
Sr. No.
Item
Number/Quantity
Cost
Bharat work machine with electric motor
12500
Niting macine with design book
10000
Table, chair and show case cupboard
6500
Raw material such as threats, rill etc and electric bill
6000
Repair, maintenance
250
Labour charges (3-4)
6000
Total
43250

Sr. No.
Return Details
Cost
Raw material
6000
Labour charges
6000
electric bill
250
Depreciation cost
150
Sub total
12400/-
cost of selling from Bharat work item 390 X 30
9750
Cost of selling from other cloths like sweter 200 X 25
5000
Total Income
14750/-
10
Net profit (9-6)
2350/-
Production System-: Mandap and Sound Service for Patan Project

Introduction:
Now a days Mandap and Sound service is mostly useful for marrage, any festival or for political events. It gives the facility like sitting and comfort
for people at such events. To start such business there is no need of training but it requires enough space for storage. Regarding this business,
there is no need of approval from government.
Sr. No.
Item
Number/Quantity
Cost
Bamboos
300
15000
Cotton cloths to tie on floor (20X30)
600 sq. m.
20000
Jute carpet on ground
600 sq. m.
8900
Bed, pillow, bed sheet
50 pairs
25000
Wedding decorated set
1 set
7500
Wedding chair
1 set
4000
Folding ladder
1800
Hand operated cart
5000
Tube lights
40 Nos.
8000
10
Decorative light
11
ceiling and pedestal fan
12
Total

4500
10
10000
109700
Sr. No.
Return Details
Cost
Labour charge for service
2000
Transportation charge
500
Depreciation cost
600
Repair and maintenance
500
Sub Total Expenditure for 1 month
3600
Monthly gross income
12000
Monthly Net income (7-6)
8400/-
Production System-: Paper Dish making

Paper dish are biodegradable, human friendly, free from pest and can be made without using any chemicals. These plates can be used for having
all type of food such as hot, cod or wet. These plates are useful during picnic, festival, marriage or any other such type of events. In the modern life
atmosphere, paper plates act as the important item and is ideal in use for parties and functions.
Sr. No.
Item
Number/Quantity
Cost
Foot operated machine
22000
Hand operated machine
18000
Wooden Table
2500
Different types and shape Moulds
6000
Rack (wooden/still)
3500
Raw material (vegetable, plastic, )
20000
Salary (2 labour)
4000
Total
76000
Sr. No.
Return Details
Cost
raw material
20000
Salary
4000
Power expenditure
800
Packing
400
Depreciation cost
400
Repairing and maintenance
300
Total Expenditure for 1 month
25900/-
Production of plate (@ 2000 plate daily with Rs 0.75 per plate)
37500/-
Monthly Net income (8-7)
11600/-
Production System-: Fodder bank for Patan Watershed

Introduction:
"The fodder bank technology is a farming practice whereby leguminous shrubs and grass species are grown on a farm to provide fodder for
livestock sector." It provides a wide range of animal products that are rich in high quality proteins and have the potential as good and sustainable
sources of income in many areas. However, lack of fodder in terms of quality and quantity, is one of the major constraints towards the low
productivity of cattle in Patan watershed Project.
The fodder bank ensures fodder availability which in turn reduces the distressed migration of the people resulting in sustainable livelihood
opportunities and enhances natural resource security in the project area.
Objective of a fodder bank:

1. Build a local fodder bank and organize the distribution of fodder during drought and scarce situation.
2.
Establish and maintain village fodder farm in the community grazing area, and allocate the community land for fodder production, in
association with dairy co-operatives.

3. Control regulates and charge in the community grazing and pastures lands.
4. Undertake the distribution of fodder seeds and slips in the village.
Primary problem of the project

Vinjalpar village comes under totally rainfed agriculture because of this migration percentage is very high. Soil is very suitable for fodder crop
mainly sorghum but due the scarcity of irrigation water only one crop can be taken throughout the year. So fodder bank play an important role to
solve this problem. Majority of farmers own less than 2.5ha of land for food and fodder production but lack of irrigation water has made these
lands unproductive. The concept of fodder bank can overcome the problem of seasonal feed shortage, migration and poor animal performance. A
It is the milch animal, which is the worst affected during these periods of drought, due to lack of productivity of sufficient fodder and water. As a
result, the poor are forced to let go with their animals in search of fodder and green pastures to other parts of the state. This eventually this leads
to colossal loss of income generating assets, poor demographic profile of village and low education level of their
children.
Even in good years, during the harvesting season, the poor tend to sell their crop residue or fodder to earn cash. At such time when supply is
higher than demand, they are not able to sell fodder at remunerative prices. The same fodder is bought back by them, mostly at higher prices
during the months of scarcity.
To meet the critical needs of fodder, especially for the poor families and protect them from inordinately high prices during the summer months,
fodder banks are proposed to be setup at the village level
Feasibility of Fodder Bank:

A detailed survey and Focused Group Discussion was conducted in Vinjalpar watershed area. The number and type of cattle as well as the fodder
production capacity of the village was collect during these surveys. In focused group discussion several factors like the various types of fodder
available locally, the quantity of fodder to be stored in the fodder bank, the size of fodder bank, the amount of finances required to operate a
fodder bank etc were discussed with the farmers, User group and Watershed committee. The fodder bank should be sustainable and towards that,
the sale price of fodder should cover operating costs and losses in storage. All these decisions were taken jointly with the member of operating
fodder bank.
Primary Model for A Fodder Bank

A
Total Dairy farmers

No. of Cattle to be catered by one fodder bank.
Total Cattle
Total
Fodder requirement per day [10 kg dry fodder for adult and 4kg for
calf.]
70
No. of adult animals
100
No. of calves
150
1000 kg for adult and 200 kg for calf
Total 1200 kg per day.
2160 Quintal
Fodder requirement for 180 days.

5Ha * 200 (Qt. per Ha)=1000 quintal
Fodder come from community land
23,000 Rs
Cost of cultivation for fodder production (See table:2)
2700-2250=450 quintal
Remaining requirement for 120 days Total Cost Avg. procurement
Calf
50
rate in harvesting season, Rs.600 per Qt. including transportation

*.'
Net Cost of Fodder Production
"K' (cost of cultivation + Cost of
600*450= Rs.2,70,000/-3,40,000
procurement)
B.
Area development for fodder bank Land required Approx. 3000 m2
Rs7200
(preferably land will be allotted by Gram Panchayat @ Rs.600 per
c.
month)
Cl. Fencing + Weighing machine + Small shed + Other tools.
Rs.50,000/-
D.
Total Cost for Fodder bank (A+B)
Rs. 3,47,200/-
Cost of cultivation for fodder production

Cost Detail
1. Cost for tillage
2. Cost for seed
3. Cost for fertilizer
4. Cost for irrigation
5. Depreciation cost of Cl. (20%)
Total cost for 5 hec
Unit cost
4.5 hour*5 hec*400 Rs=9000
12 kg seed *5 hec *150= 9000
3500 Rs
2,000 Rs
3,000 Rs
Rs. 23500/-
Rs
Rs
Revenue and return Details.

S. No
1
Return Details
Cost of fodder Per Kg
Cost (in Rs.)

= 3,47,200/270000
1.28 Rs/kg
2.
Selling Price of Fodder
Rs 2 /Kg
3.
4.
Net selling Price

Net Profit
Rs. 5,40,000
Rs 1,92,800
Production of Fodder:
We will produce 2250 quintal fodder from community land of Gram Panchayat and for remaining requirement we can fulfill by two
ways first one buy the fodder at the time of harvesting and second we can take land on lease agreement from some other government as
well as private agency.
Technical Support/Assistance:
To ensure proper technical support for fodder bank and smooth functioning of activities the required technical assistance may be taken from
Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVK), Dept. of Agriculture, Dairy and DWDU.
Advantages:
The importance of a fodder bank can be well understood. The fodder banks will provide much needed relief and self-reliance to poor in
the village especially in drought condition. Specifically, the advantages are:>
It will reduce migration during drought condition.
>
Farmers can purchase and sale of fodder at village level, thus doing away with costs incurred by them to carry out these
transactions at the city market.
>
It can reduce in overall market prices of fodder during the lean season.
>
Ensure availability of fodder during the lean season at affordable and reasonable prices.
>
Reduced distress sale of cattle due to non -availability and / or non-affordability of fodder.
>
Higher incomes for the poor as cattle will have enough fodder even during the lean season
>
Increase employment opportunities at the village level associated with the sale, purchase and storage of fodder.
Model for a Vermi-compost Unit

S. No
Particulars
Quantity
Rate (Rs.)
Amount (Rs.)
Precast Concrete Pillars (4 m long)
12
400
4800
Bamboo frame angle for shade (4 m)
20
45 per meter
3600
Bamboo battles frame work for shade
LS
Shade net (100 per cent) for covering the roof
40 sq.m
50
2000
Binding wire for tying
20 Kg
50
1000
Labour charges for erection of sheds
10
100
1000
Shovels, spades, crowbars, iron baskets,
LS
Weighing B (100 kg capacity)
1500
1500
Cow dung @ 80kg/m3
400
1200
Worms @ 350 per m3 500 worms per kg
8 kg
200
1600
10
Formation of vermin bed with agro-waste, cow dung and worms
10.8 m3
40
432
11
Miscellaneous
1000
Total cost
22,632
Returns from vermicomposting

Benefits
1. Sale of vermin compost of 7 tones @ Rs.3000/- per ton

7*3000=21000 Rs
2000
2500
2. Sale of worms @ 5 kg per ton of compost and Rs. 50 per kg
35*50=1750 Rs
S.Total
22750 Rs/-
vermicompost preparation cost
6732 Rs/-
Net profit
16018 Rs/-
Total Vermicompost Unit for Patan Project

Sr. No
Village Name
No. of Unit
Per unit cost
Total cost
Patan
10
22632
226320
22632
45264
22632
113160
22632
113160
Total
497904/-
Paradava
3
4
Amrapar
Malavada
Production System - 5 : Vermicomposting unit

Introduction:
The process of composting crop residues using earthworms comprise spreading the agricultural wastes and cow dung in layers as
1.5 m wide and 0.9 m high beds of required length. Earthworms are introduced in between the layers @ 350 worms per m 3 of bed
volume. The beds are maintained at about 40 - 50% moisture content and a temperature of 20 - 30 C by sprinkling water over the
beds. The earthworms being voracious eaters consume the biodegradable matter and give out a part of the matter as excreta or
vermi-castings. The vermi-casting containing nutrients are rich manure for the plants.
About The Worms

Eisenia fetida, Eudrilus eugeniae, and Perionyx excavatius are some of the species for rearing to convert organic wastes into manure. The
worms feed on any biodegradable matter ranging from coir waste to kitchen garbage and Vermicomposting units are ideally suited to locations /
units with generation of considerable quantities of organic wastes. One earthworm reaching reproductive age of about six weeks lays one egg
capsule (containing 7 embryos) every 7 - 10 days. Three to seven worms emerge out of each capsule. Thus, the multiplication of worms under
optimum growth conditions is very fast. The worms live for about 2 years. Fully grown worms could be separated and dried in an oven to make
'worm meal' which is a rich source of protein (70%) for use in animal feed.
Location
Patan Project has lots of animals so it can become good vermi compost center as well as good source of livelihood. Vermicompost is
very suitable for fruit, flower and vegetable as well as cereal crops. It increases quality and quantity of product in per unit area.
Use
Put lack irrigation arid desert so chemical is not advisable so to increate nutritive value of soil and available farmyard manure Vermi
compost has more nutrient compare to other manures and fertilizer so by the use of vermi compost we can reduce use of chemical fertilizer.
Vermi compost not only supply nutrient but also improve quantity of hormones for plant growth, improves the soil structure leading to
increase in water and nutrient holding capacities of soil.
Components of A Commercial Unit
Sheds
Shed should be at such place so that it will be protected from both heat and rain water. Shed should be atleast 3 m wide and 10 m
length. We can make it by the use of precast concrete pillars as it is available in the market so it reduces the cost and time. It will prevent
wetting of beds due to rain on a windy day.
Vermi-beds
Scientific bed side is 75 cm - 90 cm thick depending on the provision of filter for drainage of excess water. The whole bed area should
be above the ground. The bed should have a uniform height over the entire width to the extent possible to avoid low production owing to low
bed volumes. The proper bed width should not be more that 1.5 m to allow easy access to the centre of the bed. And bed length should be 8 m
and 1 m height.
Land
About 30 square meter of land will be required to set up a vermin compost production unit. It should have a good watering arrangement
and other equipments as required because moisture is very essential for vermin compost production. Site selection should be such that it is already
near or under greenery so that it helps in maintaining the moisture. We can take land from Gram panchayat and it can be taken on lease of at least
10-15 years.
Seed Stock
This is very important thing because worms multiply at the rate of 350 worms per m3 of bed space over a period of 6 month to a year.
Fencing
The entire area has to be fenced to prevent the animals and other unwanted elements. These could be estimated based on the length
of the periphery of the farm.
Water Supply System

We have to maintain always 50-60 % moisture content, there is need to plan for a water source, lifting mechanism and a system of
conveying and applying the water to the vermi-beds. Initially for 10 days water should be applied regularly by manually to maintain the required
moisture percentage.
Machinery
Farm machinery and implements are required for cutting the raw material in small pieces, conveying shredded raw material to the
vermi-sheds, loading, unloading, collection of compost, loosening of beds for aeration, shifting of the compost. Costs of providing necessary
implements and the machinery have to be included in the project cost.
Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas
Name(s) of the
villages
S. No
Patan
CPR particulars
Waste land
Community Waste land
Community Pasture land
Paradava
Total for Village

Expected no. of
beneficiaries
12
17
3
16.98
12.68
1.68
96
45
20
48
52.14
161
5
5
2
7.07
3.73
1.12
88
85
42
26
30.79
215
Activity proposed Target area under

the activity (ha)
Afforestation
Fodder
Horticulture
Total for Village

Waste land
Waste land
Waste land
Target
Estimated
expenditure (Rs.)
Afforestation
Fodder
Horticulture
Amrapar
Afforestation
Fodder
Horticulture
Total for Village
Malavada
Afforestation
Fodder
Horticulture
Total for Village
3
10
3
36
3
5
1
17
4.24
7.46
1.68
13.64
4.24
3.73
0.56
6.26
Table No. 45, Summary of Soil and water conservation Structures and activity
S. No
1
2
Measure
Staggered Contour Trenching / Stone Bunding
Waste vier
Unit/Length (Rm)
275 Ha
706 Nos.
Net Expense
3437500
9531000
Convergence Statergy
Forest
NREGS
Check Dam
52 Nos.
15993700
NREGS
Cause Way
14 Nos.
7788000
NREGS
Earthen bund
13765 rmt
3031688
NREGS
Farm Pond
25
4200000
NREGS
Farm bund
223500 rmt
9156000
NREGS
Horticulture plantation( in Ha)
9 Ha
504000
NREGS
Afforestration( in Ha.)
23 Ha
10578198
Forest
Total
64220086/-
95
26
56
177
96
44
16
156
Table no. :46, Details of activities of preparatory phase (AH financial figures in lakh Rs.)
Sr.
Name of villages
No.
1
Initiation of
Capacity
village level
building
Patan, Paradava , WC
institution
IEC activities Baseline

survey
KVK
Wall Painting House Hold
Agril.
Bill boards
Amrapar,
Malavada
SHG
UG
survey
Socio-Econo
university
mic Mapping
Farm Demo
Agri Info
Hydro-geological
Identifying
Any other
survey
technical support
(please specify)
agencies
Topographic Map BISAG
Soil Testing
Soil testing
lab,Gandhinagar
Sources of water
Climatic Details
Gram Panchayat
IMD
Capacity Building
Capacity building is a process to strengthen the abilities of people, organizations and systems to make effective and efficient use of resources in
order to make achieve their own goals on a sustainable basis. Capacity development is the process whereby individuals, groups, and organizations
enhance their abilities to mobilize and use resources in order to achieve their objectives on a sustainable basis. Efforts to strengthen abilities of
individuals, groups, and organizations can comprise a combination of (i) human skills development; (ii) changes in organizations and networks;
and (iii) changes in governance/institutional context. Capacity building is a complex notion it involves individual and organizational learning
which builds social capital and trust, develops knowledge, skills and attitudes and when successful creates an organizational culture which enables
organizations to set objectives, achieve results, solve problems and create adaptive procedures which enable it to survive in the long term.
Scope of capacity building at Patan Project Area
Income Generation Activities
Vermicompost
Patch work/Stiching
Nursary raising
Post Harvest management practices Fodder development and Management Afforestration
Gram Vatika
Crop Information
Meteorological Information
Alternative Land Use Plan
Improved and Scientific agriculture practices
Scientific technique of Soil and Moisture conservation
Information dissemination on Audio/Video
Dairy Development and Management
Rural Craft
Table no.: 47, Institutes Identified for Capacity Building

S.r. No
1
2
Organisation
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Airforce, Jamnagar
Junagadh Agricultural University
Training Given
Training in modern and scientific agriculture practices
Training in modern and better agriculture practices
Community Mobilization & Capacity Building in Desert
Areas
Research Foundation, Department of Forest, Gandhi Nagar
Training on Nursery Development and Afforestation
International Centre for Entrepreneurship & Career
Activities
Livelihood activities and small business in rural ares.
Development, Ahmedabad
CHAPTER - 5
BUDGETING
Budgeting
(*Detailed Budgeting has to be done at the PIA level table no.
Budget Component
% of the Budget
Net Project Cost
100
10
1
1
1090.75
109.07
10.90
10.90
4
5
1
43.63
545.37
10.90
50
10
13
5
100
54.53
109.07
141.79
54.53
1090.75
-Administrative Costs
-Monitoring
-Evaluation
Preparatory phase:
-Entry point activities
-Institution and capacity building
-Detailed Project Report (DPR)
Watershed Works Phase:
-Watershed Development works,
-Livelihood activities for the asset less persons,
-Production system and micro enterprises
Consolidation Phase
Total
Table no. 48: Village wise- component wise budget available under IWMP
Sl Village
no
Activity
EPA
1 Patan
16.27
Institution
and CB
20.34
DPR
4.06
Watershed
development
Work
203.45
Livelihood Production
for asset
system and
less
Microenterprises
52.89
40.69
Consolidation Total
20.34
358.04
2 Paradava
3 Amrapar
4 Malavada
8.99
13.67
4.68
11.23
17.09
5.85
2.24
3.41
1.17
112.38
170.95
58.57
29.22
44.44
15.22
22.47
34.19
11.71
11.23
17.09
5.85
197.76
300.84
103.05
Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement

Sl No
Village
Total cost requirement
1
2
3
4
Patan
Paradava
Amrapar
Malavada
Total
410.33
264.95
402.17
127.14
1204.59
Total funds
available under
IWMP
406.91
224.77
341.91
117.14
1090.73
Gap in funds
requirement
3.42
40.17
60.26
10.00
113.85
Table no.49.1: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes
S. No.
Village
Patan
Paradava
Activity to be carried out

Afforestation
Farm bunding
Check Dam
Staggered contour Trenches
Afforestation
Farm bunding
Check Dam
Check Dam Cum Causeway
Fund made available

to IWMP due to
convergence (Rs. in
lakh)
1.0
1.0
0.92
0.50
10.0
10.0
15.0
4.0
1.17
Reference no. of
activity/ task/ structure
in DPR
Forest
NREGA
NREGA
Forest
Forest
NREGA
NREGA
Forest
NREGA
Level at which
decision for
convergence was
taken
PIA Level
Dist level
Dist level
PIA Level
PIA Level
Dist level
Dist level
PIA Level
Dist level
Amrapar
Malavada
Afforestation
Farm bunding
Check Dam
Afforestation
Farm bunding
Check Dam
Total
12.0
15.0
10.0
8.26
15.0
2.0
4.0
2.30
0.80
0.90
113.85
Forest
NREGA
NREGA
Forest
NREGA
Forest
NREGA
NREGA
Forest
NREGA
PIA Level
Dist level
Dist level
PIA Level
Dist level
PIA Level
Dist level
Dist level
PIA Level
Dist level
Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes

SR. NO.
Names of
Fund made
Was this fund
Departments with available to IWMP included in

Schemes
due to convergence Rs.15,000/
converging with
(Rs. in lakh)
undertaken with converged funds decision for
15,000
per
Yes
Noha.
(a) Structures (b) livelihoods (c )

Any other (pi. specify)
NREGA
75.29
Yes
Yes
No
Structures
n
Forest
37.56
Yes
No
Structures
Level at which
convergence was
IWMP
1
Name of activity /task/structure
taken
CHAPTER - 6
EXPECTED
Expected Outcomes
Employment
Employment has always been a problem in the village. The principal occupations of the people are dry land agriculture, animal husbandry and
casual labour work. However, rain fall being very limited and erratic, agriculture suffers, i.e. at best they can take only a single crop, which keeps
them partially engaged for about 4 months. Lack of fodder makes animal husbandry very difficult too. So, animal husbandry does not keep them
engaged full time. Thus the people mainly depend upon casual labour, either in the village itself or outside it.
The project plans for creation of both wage employment and self employment opportunities. Wage employment would be created by engaging
people in watershed physical works like construction of earthen bunds, farm bunds, village pond, plantation, etc. Self employment would be
created by providing the people with cash support in the form of direct livelihood activities like agriculture, animal husbandry and enterprise
development.
Table no. 52: Employment in Project area
s r.
Names of
Wage employment
No. of mandays
No. of beneficiaries
ST
Others Women Total SC
Villages
SC
NO.
ST
Others Women Total SC
74085
45120
85728 125
0
Patan 7625 0
1
No.
of
mandays
2 Paradava 10065 0
33855 24253 46080 165
0
SC
3 Amrapar 9882 3477 59079 40000 76000 162
57
4
Malvada
3904 1098
5612
5861
11136
64
18
1215
705
1340
25
Self employment
No. of beneficiaries
ST
Others Women Total
0
243
161
268
555
969
379
625
720
1188
33
32
0
29
111
194
86
153
144
255
92
92
174
13
18
24
40
Migration
Low rainfall results in very little fodder availability in the locality. The relatively well off farmers bring fodder from Mehsana (approximately 300
kms away] collectively; but the resource poor cannot afford it. On account of agriculture and animal husbandry providing only part time
employment for some part of the year, the people migrate for a better half of the year for wage labour.
Employment opportunities in the local area as mentioned above will ensure lessening seasonal migration from the area.
Table no. 53, Details of seasonal migration from Project area

SR No.
Names of villages
Patan
Paradava
Amrapar
Malavada
No. of persons migrating

Pre-project
Expected post project
896
90
275
27
100
10
60
6
No. of days per year of migration

Pre-project
180
90
60
180
Expected post project

00
00
00
00
Ground water table

Rainfall has been scanty but demand for ground water has been increasing all the time. The ground water table thus has depleted over
the years. Presently it stands at 35 mt.
Proper water harvesting structures and percolation-tanks wotttd-go a long way in increastng-watertable depth from-2frmHrrtfae-pri
Project level to 34 mt in the post project period.
Table no. 53: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters)
Sr. No.
Names of Villages
Sources
Pre-Project level
Expected Increase/ decrease (Post- Project)
Patan
Open wells
35
NA
-
34.70
NA
-
Detailed Project Report IWMP-1 (Patan ) Bore wells
Others (specify)
Drinking water
Patan and Amrapar villages have water tank for drinking water but due to deficiency of water in summer season people faces problem of
drinking water for tow months. Other villages have well for drinking purpose but the same problem arrives in summer season so if the
watershed development project get implemented with proper planning and management, then such type of problem can finished forever.
As a result of the watershed activities, it is expected that the quantity and quality of drinking water would improve.
Table no. 54: Status of Drinking water
s.
No.
Names of
Availability of drinking water (no. of months in a year)
Quality of drinking water
Pre-project
9
Pre-project
Saline with
Comments
Villages
Patan
Expected Post project

12
Expected Post-project
Potable
highTDS
Crops
Agriculture primarily depends upon water; but this is what is lacking in Patan village. The surface water is scanty due to low rainfall and
Ground water is saline, which is unfit for crop production.
All this can change with the integrated land and water management during the watershed project. The planned earthen bunds would prevent the saline
water from the Rann of Kutch to mix with the sweet rain water and also help percolate sweet water underground, and preserve some moisture in the soil.
This will help in additional area coming under cultivation and increasing productivity too. The farmers can take more than one season of crops.
Different varieties of crops can be taken.hg
Table no. 55: Details of crop area and yield in the project areas
Pre-project
Name of village
Name of crops
Average Yield (Kg) per ha.
Average Yield per ha
Area (ha)
(Kg)
Area (ha)
Kharif
Patan
Cotton
800.30 Ha
2250 Kg
800.30 Ha
2600 Kg
Ground Nut
Bajara
308.50 Ha
1375 Kg
308.50 Ha
1600 Kg
20.0
2150 Kg
20.0
2300 Kg
30.20 Ha
20.60 Ha
3750 Kg
500 Kg
30.20 Ha
20.60 Ha
3850 Kg
700 Kg
460.20 Ha
350.50 Ha
38.90 Ha
2150 Kg
1275 Kg
2050 Kg
460.20 Ha
350.50 Ha
38.90 Ha
2400 Kg
1400 Kg
2200 Kg
45.20 Ha
15.80 Ha
3450 Kg
495 Kg
45.20 Ha
15.80 Ha
3750 Kg
600 Kg
1112.30 Ha
600.50 Ha
245.10 Ha
74.50 Ha
2450 Kg
1575 Kg
2350 Kg
2250 Kg
1112.30 Ha
600.50 Ha
245.10 Ha
74.50 Ha
2700 Kg
1800 Kg
2700 Kg
2600 Kg
125.0 Ha
103.0 Ha
3650 Kg
550 Kg
125.0 Ha
103.0 Ha
3750 Kg
600 Kg
195.60 Ha
78.30 Ha
1900 Kg
2100 Kg
195.60 Ha
78.30 Ha
2100 Kg
2200 Kg
Rabi
Wheat
Jira
Paradava
Castor
Kharif
Cumin
Cotton
Ground Nut
Bajara
Rabi
Wheat
Jira
Castor
Kharif
Cumin
Amrapar
Cotton
Ground Nut
Bajara
Castel(Arnda)
Rabi
Wheat
Jira
Castor
Malavada
Cumin
Kharif
Cotton
Ground Nut
Horticulture
Table no. 56: Area under horticulture

Sr. No.
Name of Village
Patan
Existing area under horticulture (ha)
Area under horticulture proposed to be covered
through IWMP
16
Vegetative cover
There is negligible area under tree cover. The village has a forest area of 524 ha which consists of only Juliflora Prosopis [ganda babool).
Trees like Neem and _Alianthus_are seen just here and there, not concentrated in any area.
It is planned that 15 ha land to be covered under new plantation.
Table no. 57: Forest/vegetative cover
Sr. No.
1
Name of Village
Malavada
Existing area under tree cover (ha)

39.40
Area under tree cover proposed(Ha)

6
Livestock
The village has quite a good of livestock population. These include cows, bullocks, buffaloes, goats, sheep and camels. The interventions like
provision of good quality cows and buffaloes, the establishment of a fodder bank and other such related activities would spur up the dairy
development in the village. It is expected that the post project period would see a substantial increase in livestock population and yield from them.
Table no. 58: Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in litres, for solids please mention in kgs. and
income in Rs.)
Sr. No. Name of Village Type of Animal
Pre-Project
No.
Yield(Liter
Income
No.
Per day)
1
Patan
Paradava
Amrapar
Malavada
Linkages
Milch-animals
Buffalo
Cow
Goat
Milch-animals
Buffalofper
animal/day)
Buffalo
Cowfper animal/day)
Cow
Goat
Draught Purpose animals
Milch-animals
Buffalofper
animal/day)
Buffalo
Cowfper animal/day)
Cow
Goat
Milch-animals
Buffalofper
animal/day)
Buffalo
Cowfper animal/day)
Cow
Goat
Remarks
Yield(Liter Income
Per day)
1134
6804
163296
1800
12600
352800
774
No.
130
3096
260
68112
3900
1000
200
2200
600
55000
12000
250
151
301
1500
604
604
37500
13288
9060
350
200
500
2450
1200
1500
73500
33600
25000
386
114
75
2316
456
150
57900
10032
2250
400
300
200
2800
1200
600
78400
30000
12000
1337
172
76
8022
688
152
176484
13760
2280
1500
300
200
10500
1500
600
294000
37500
12000
Buffalofper
animal/day)
Cowfper animal/day)
The direct livelihood activities need good forward and backward support. Without such support system the activities may fail to deliver the
Draughtwould
Purpose
animalscredit, machinery, input supply, marketing, etc.
desired results. These linkages
involve
Table no. 59: Backward-Forward linkages

Sr. No.
Project
Type of Marketing Facility
Pre-project (no.)
During the project (no.)
Post-project (no.)
Patan
Backward linkages
Seed certification
Seed supply system
Fertilizer supply system
Pesticide supply system
l_ Credit institutions
Water supply
Extension services
Nurseries
Tools/machinery suppliers
Price Support system
Labour
Forward linkages
Harvesting/threshing machinery
Storage (including cold storage)
Road network
Transport facilities
Markets / Mandis
Agro and other Industries
3
1
3
1
Collective marketing
Collective marketing
system
Cumin
system
1
processing/packaging-1
Milk and other collection centres
Labour
Milk collection centre-1
Fodder bank-4
Vermi-compost unit-4
Animal vitamins (50 It)
4
4
Animal vitamins (100
It)
CHAPTER - 7
QUALITY AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES
Quality and Sustainability Issues

Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation
A Web-based CIS System is being developed for monitoring and Evaluatting the project in its planning & implementation phases.
The system would be available on a public domain and can be accessed by all the stakeholders of the project. The system shows the
entire state of Gujarat and all of those areas selected over the next 18 years. Filtering allows the user to zoom onto one particular
project. Details related to soil type, Land-use classification, inhabitation etc., can be obtained village-wise. Furthermore, survey-number
wise details related to ownership, irrigation source, yield etc., can also be accessed by the users of the system. This system is being used
for pooling up the details obtained from the DPR. In other words, the DPR is made available online in the form of a database which will
help the stakeholders know areas of importance viz., already treated areas/historical works in the area, proposed areas for treatment
etc., for further treatment and planning. The system would also show the satellite imageries of various years from the project inception
stage to the project closing stages. This allows the user to Evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment and thereby plan corrective
measures for the project area. The system would serve as an aiding tool to the planners and Evaluators for judging the efficacy of the
project.
Yet another component of the Web-based CIS system is the Mobile based Monitoring & Evaluation System, which will help the ground staff alias
WDTs [Watershed Development Team) to transmit information from the ground level to the central server. Also, any higher-up official in charge
of the project can obtain information regarding the project area on their mobile phone by means of an SMS. The system works in the following
manner. The WDT equipped with a GPS instrument marks the latitude-longitude information of various treatment areas during the DPR. The
probable sites are then transferred onto the central server. During the works phase, any
Plans For Project management:

The Project management of any watershed programme is very important. It mainly depends upon the community organisation and the village
level institutes.In Vinjalpar, watershed committee and various user group have been formulated for post project operation and maintenance of
assets created during project period. Major emphasis will be on equity and sustainable benefit of the project even after implementation stage. A
proper link-up will be built during project period with various institutes and capacity building organisation. They will act as a major kingpin
during post implementation for scaling up the successful experience during project.
Watershed Development Fund:
The major source of financial assistance after post implementation period is watershed Development Fund. The contribution of it
will comes mainly fund the following:
Table No. 60. Details of Watershed Development Fund(WDF)

S. No
1
Financial Details
Natural Resource Management
For General
ForSC/ST
For Intensive Agriculture, Horticulture and animal Husbandry
For General
ForSC/ST
Percent Contribution
10%
5%
40%
20%
It is planned that for SC/ST, BPL population the contribution will be taken in form of voluntary labour and the fund for labour will be diverted to
the WDF.
User Charges:
Various user groups will be formed in village. These user groups will collect user charges according to the designated rules formed during the
formation of user group. These funds will be transferred to the WDF funds as per these formulated rules. The secretary of watershed committee
(WC) shall maintain the records of the following.
Chapter - 8: Maps

DPR - Water Shed Managkent

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Titolo originale

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

DPR - Water Shed Managkent

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

GUJARAT STATE WATERSHED MANAGEMENT AGENCY

Detailed Project Report

District Watershed Development Unit - Jamnagar

Detailed Project Report IWMP-1 (Patan )

District Watershed Development Unit - Jamnagar

Detailed Project Report

Detailed Project Report IWMP-1 (Patan )

District Watershed Development Unit - Jamnagar

Project Implementing Agency.......................................................................................................................................................................................16

Basic Information of Project Area .............................................................................................................................................................................23

District Watershed Development Unit - Jamnagar

District Watershed Development Unit - Jamnagar

Table no: 37: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Group(SHGs)........................................................................................................................61

District Watershed Development Unit - Jamnagar

Detailed Project Report IWMP-1 (Patan )

District Watershed Development Unit - Jamnagar

Detailed Project Report IWMP-1 (Patan )

District Watershed Development Unit - Jamnagar

1.1 Project Background

Table no. 1 : Basic project information

Detailed Project Report IWMP-1 (Patan )

District Watershed Development Unit - Jamnagar

Table no. 2 : Watershed information

Need of Watershed Development Programme

District Watershed Development Unit - Jamnagar

Area proposed to be treated

Table no. 3 : Weightage of the Project

Detailed Project Report IWMP-1 (Patan )

District Watershed Development Unit - Jamnagar

Detailed Project Report IWMP-1 (Patan )

District Watershed Development Unit - Jamnagar

Other projects/scheme running in the Project area:

WASMO: Water tanks,Pipe Line-Malavada.

Swarnjayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana (SGSY )-Business Loan, Well

Dipping Loan-Patan, Business Loan-Paradava, Business Loan-

Amrapar, Business Loan-Malavada

Detailed Project Report IWMP-1 (Patan )

District Watershed Development Unit - Jamnagar

Table no.4: Developmental programmers running in the project area:

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmers in the project area:

Fundin Nodal PIA

Detailed Project Report IWMP-1 (Patan )

District Watershed Development Unit - Jamnagar

Discussion with Villagers

District Watershed Development Unit - Jamnagar

Detailed Project Report IWMP-1 (Patan )

District Watershed Development Unit - Jamnagar

Detailed Project Report IWMP-1 (Patan )

District Watershed Development Unit - Jamnagar

Project Implementing Agency

District Watershed Development Unit, Jamnagar.

Detailed Project Report IWMP-1 (Patan )

District Watershed Development Unit - Jamnagar

Programmes/projects running in the district

SWOT Analysis of the DWDU:

Detailed Project Report IWMP-1 (Patan )

District Watershed Development Unit - Jamnagar

Detailed Project Report IWMP-1 (Patan )

District Watershed Development Unit - Jamnagar

Table no. 6: PIA:

District Level Nodal Agency

B.Sc. (Agri) &

Detailed Project Report IWMP-1 (Patan )