Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Revision: 0
Date: 29 March 2013
Author: Dharmit Thakore
Executive Summary
The main objective of this project was to understand the Finite Element Analysis capability of Open
Source Software Salome for Pre-processing and Post-processing and Code_Aster for analysis of a
Pressure Vessel Nozzle junction. Main goal was to calculate Stresses by hand and compare them
with the Finite Element Analysis results.
Analysis was carried out on a quarter section of a pressure vessel with nozzle in the middle of the
geometry, with sufficient symmetry and other boundary conditions added for stability of the model.
Linear analysis using Tetrahedral elements was carried out for this study.
Salome version 6.3.0 and Aster version 1.10.0 was used for this analysis.
From the study it can be seen that hand calculations closely match the Finite Element Analysis
results. Further studies are required to evaluate stresses and analyse them based on ASME Section
VIII Division 2.
P a g e 1 | 17
Table of Contents
Executive Summary................................................................................................................................. 1
Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 3
Model Geometry ..................................................................................................................................... 4
Loads and Restraints ............................................................................................................................... 5
Mesh ....................................................................................................................................................... 6
Analysis of results ................................................................................................................................... 7
Hoop Stresses...................................................................................................................................... 7
Longitudinal Stresses .......................................................................................................................... 9
Internal Pressure ............................................................................................................................... 11
Only Force ......................................................................................................................................... 13
Force and Internal Pressure Combined Loading ............................................................................... 15
Conclusions ........................................................................................................................................... 17
P a g e 2 | 17
Introduction
The main goal of this study was to validate Finite Element Analysis performed for following cases
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Based on the results and findings of this study, my higher goal is to learn Pressure Vessel Design
based on ASME Section VIII Division 2 Part 5. A very small part of the Pressure vessel design is
considered in this study, the Junction of Nozzle and Pressure vessel.
In this study Static Linear Finite Element Analysis was used to obtain results. Quadratic mesh was
not considered for this study as the main goal of this study was to investigate whether the real world
experience can be modelled in Finite Element Analysis.
Vonmises stresses were calculated for the 5 load cases above and they were compared with hand
calculations using first principles.
P a g e 3 | 17
Model Geometry
The model geometry is a quarter section
of a Pressure Vessel modelled in positive
X-Y-Z zone of the co-ordinate system. This
pressure vessel has a nozzle at the centre
of it pointing in positive X-Y direction.
P a g e 4 | 17
DX=0
DY=0
P a g e 5 | 17
Mesh
3D tetrahedron mesh was used for this study.
Tetrahedron maximum volume was restricted to
maximum 50 in Salome.
Global geometry was meshed with the above
configuration using automesh. Automatic tetrahedron
Hypothesis was used for global geometry. The edges of
the nozzle (inside and outside) at both ends were given a
Sub-mesh with equi-distance division of 100.
The linear mesh has 88712 tetrahedron elements.
At this stage, linear mesh is used with automatic meshing
for the global mesh with 100 linear elements on the nozzle
edges were modelled as Sub-mesh to make the edges fine
Figure 3: Mesh Information
and have more finite elements for better results around
the nozzle shell junction.
P a g e 6 | 17
Analysis of results
Hoop Stresses
For the first load case, stresses were obtained for internal pressure on the shell and nozzle junction
with force modelled on the nozzle face for balancing unbalanced pressure. The displacement and
VonMises plot are shown below in Figures 4 and 5 respectively.
(2 ) =
(2 0.3) = 0.898mm
FE analysis above in Figure 4 shows displacement in Yellow colour highlight as 0.6mm. One of the
major reason to contribute to the lower displacement compared to manual calculation is that the
boundary conditions are very close to each other and the presence of Nozzle in the centre of the
model.
= 75MPa
As can be seen in Figure 5 below, the VonMises stresses for the majority of the shell away from
boundaries and Nozzle is at an average of 75 MPa
P a g e 7 | 17
P a g e 8 | 17
Longitudinal Stresses
For the second load case, stresses were obtained for force acting on the top face of the shell to
simulate Longitudinal Stresses. The displacement and VonMises plot are shown below in Figures 6
and 7 respectively.
= 37.5MPa
As can be seen in Figure 7 below, the VonMises stresses for the majority of the shell away from
boundaries and Nozzle is at an average of 37 to 40 MPa
P a g e 9 | 17
P a g e 10 | 17
Internal Pressure
For the third load case, stresses were obtained for both Internal Pressure acting on the internal face
of the Pressure Vessel and Nozzle to simulate Hoop stress and Force acting on the top face of the
shell to simulate Longitudinal Stresses. The displacement and VonMises plot are shown below in
Figures 8 and 9 respectively
P a g e 11 | 17
) =
As can be seen in Figure 9 above, the VonMises stresses for the majority of the shell away from
boundaries and Nozzle is at an average of 65 MPa
P a g e 12 | 17
Only Force
For the fourth load case, stresses were obtained for Lateral force acting on the nozzle face. The
displacement and VonMises plot are shown below in Figures 10 and 11 respectively
P a g e 13 | 17
Some close up screen shots of nozzle-shell interface are shown below. First screenshot is for the
VonMises stress on the outside surface of the nozzle shell junction.
P a g e 14 | 17
Second screenshot below is for the VonMises stress on the Inside surface of the Nozzle shell
junction.
P a g e 15 | 17
P a g e 16 | 17
Conclusions
From this study it can be concluded that Finite Element analysis results match that of hand
calculations. This study is not exhaustive and was conducted to try doing Finite Element analysis of a
Pressure Vessel Nozzle section using Salome for modelling and post-processing and Code_Aster for
analysis
This study is just a preliminary analysis. For further study following actions are recommended
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
P a g e 17 | 17