Sei sulla pagina 1di 78

Point of Connection Methodology

for
Sharing of Transmission Charges

Methodology adopted for


Sharing of ISTS Charges
Hybrid Method
----A combination of Tracing and Marginal
Participation methods

Tracing of Electricity
Based on a paper published by Bialek in 1996
Requires base case load flow
Uses concept of proportional flows
Inconsistent with laws of physics
Attempts to identify which generators are
supplying which loads

Marginal Participation

--- changes in line flows due to incremental


1 MW change in generation/load at a node
is used to determine the participation of
the node on the lines

The Procedure
Solve Base case LF on basic
network.truncate to 400 kv
Identification of responding buses-tracing
Increment 1 MW Marginal generation/Load
at desired bus absorbed/generated by
responding buses
Calculate line utilization factors
Allocate costs to nodes
Calculate poc rate/nodal prices

Generator #1

260 MW
0 Mvar

180 MW
0 Mvar

Bus 2

Bus 1

Line 1

Line 4

Line 2

Line 3

Bus 3

100 MW
0 Mvar
Bus 4

220 MW

Line 6
Line 5

0 Mvar

Bus 5
slack

400 MW
0 Mvar

The LF studies have been done using Power World Simulator evaluation/student edition

P out Records: One MW Marginal drawal at Bus


2, Supplied by Generator at Bus 5
Bus Flows
BUS
11
400.0 MW
GENERATOR
180.00
TO
22
1 193.07 0 0.0
TO
33
1 60.21 0 0.0
TO
55
1 -73.28 0 0.0

Pout Records
Base Case
Bus Flows
BUS
11
GENERATOR
TO
22
TO
33
TO
55

400.0 MW
180.00
0.0
1 192.62 0 0.0
1 60.38 0 0.0
1 -73.00 0 0.0

BUS
22
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
44

400.0 MW
261.00
1 -193.07 0 0.0
1 -67.93 0 0.0

BUS
22
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
44

400.0 MW
260.00
1 -192.62 0
1 -67.38 0

0.0
0.0

BUS
33
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
55

400.0 MW
220.00
1 -60.21 0 0.0
1 -159.79 0 0.0

BUS
33
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
55

400.0 MW
220.00
1 -60.38 0
1 -159.62 0

0.0
0.0

BUS
44
LOAD 1
TO
22
TO
55

400.0 MW
100.00
1 67.93 0 0.0
1 -167.93 0 0.0

BUS
44
LOAD 1
TO
22
TO
55

400.0 MW
100.00
1 67.38 0
1 -167.38 0

0.0
0.0

BUS
55
GENERATOR
TO
11
TO
33
TO
44

400.0 MW
401.00
1 73.28 0 0.0
1 159.79 0 0.0
1 167.93 0 0.0

BUS
55
GENERATOR
TO
11
TO
33
TO
44

400.0 MW
400.00
0.0
1 73.00 0 0.0
1 159.62 0 0.0
1 167.38 0 0.0

Generator #1

260 MW
0 Mvar

180 MW
0 Mvar

Bus 2

Bus 1

192.62 MW
Line 1

60.38 MW

Line 4

Line 2

Line 3

73 MW
Bus 3

100 MW
0 Mvar
Bus 4

220 MW

Line 6
Line 5

0 Mvar

Bus 5
slack

400 MW
0 Mvar

Contribution of 180 MW generator on line 4= 60.38*180/(180+73)= 42.96 MW

For a large system it is not possible to


follow this simple method
......... It requires the solution of the [A]
matrices.

Pi = nodal power at node i = sum of injections = sum of withdrawals

Generator #1

260 MW
0 Mvar

P1=253
180 MW
0 Mvar

Bus 2

Bus 1

1-2=192.62
Line 1

1-3=60.38

P2=260

4-2=67.38

Line 4

Line 2

Line 3

P4=167.38
Bus 3

P3=220

100 MW
0 Mvar
Bus 4

220 MW

Line 6
Line 5

0 Mvar

5-4=167.38

5-3=159.62
Bus 5
slack

400 MW
0 Mvar

P5=400

5-1=73.00

From The Tracing of Electricity J.Bialek, 1996

Contribution of Generator k in line outflow


in line i-l emanating from node i=
|Pi-l|*[Au-1]ik*PGk/Pi
[Au] ij

1
-|Pj-i|/Pj
0

if i=j
if j belongs to set of
nodes directly supplying
to node i
otherwise

Au Matrix

Au
Inv

Au
1.000

-0.183

1.000

0.183

-0.759

1.000

-0.403

0.759

1.000

0.403

0.307

-0.239

1.000

-0.399

0.239

1.000

0.443

1.000

-0.418

0.000

1.000

0.418

1.000

1.000

From The Tracing of Electricity J.Bialek, 1996

Contribution of Generator k to Load at


node i=

PLi*[Au-1]ik*PGk/Pi

From The Tracing of Electricity J.Bialek, 1996

Contribution of Load k in line inflow in line


i-j into node i=
|Pi-l|*[Ad-1]ik*PLk/Pi
[Ad] ij

1
-|Pj-i|/Pj
0

if i=j
if j belongs to set of
nodes directly supplied
from node i
otherwise

Ad matrix

Ad
Inv

Ad
1.000

-0.741

-0.274

0.000

0.000

1.000

0.741

0.274

0.000

0.000

1.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

1.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

1.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

1.000

0.000

0.000

-0.259

0.000

1.000

0.000

0.000

0.259

0.000

1.000

0.000

-0.289

0.000

-0.726

-1.000

1.000

0.289

0.473

0.805

1.000

1.000

Line1(1-2)

Line2(4-2)

Line3(5-1)

Line4(1-3)

Line5(5-3)

Line6(5-4)

Generator
1 (MW)

137.04

42.96

71

71

Generator
2(MW)

55.58

67

73

17.42

159.62

167.38

29

100

100

29

100

100

Total

192.62

67

73

60.38

159.62

167.38

Load line contribution

Line1(12)

Line2(4-2)

Line3(5-1)

Line4(1-3)

Line5(5-3)

Line6(5-4)

192.6

67.38

55.59

67.38

100

100

76

40

Load (bus 3)

17.41

60.38

159.62

24

100

100

load (bus 4)

100

60

192.6

67.38

73

60.38

159.62

167.38

Load (bus2)

Load (bus
2)
136.62

Load (bus
3)
43.02

Load (bus
4)
0

53

20

Gen
2(bus5)
%

123.38

176.98

100

47

80

100

Total

260

220

100

Gen
1(bus1)
%

Increase 1 MW load at Bus 2


and as per result of tracing
Generator 1 will respond with 53%
that is 0.53 MW and Generator 2
will respond with 47% that is 0.47
MW

Generator #1

261 MW
0 Mvar

181 MW
0 Mvar

Bus 2

Bus 1

Line 1

Line 4

Line 2

Line 3

Bus 3

100 MW
0 Mvar
Bus 4

220 MW

Line 6
Line 5

0 Mvar

Bus 5
slack

400 MW
0 Mvar

Calculation of Seasonal Index &


Marginal Participation Factors

Seasonal index (for node i line l):


Ue,i,l =(|Flei| - |Fle|).P ie
|Flei| - |Fle| must be >0

Pout Records: Marginal 1 MW INCR at Bus 2


Bus Flows
BUS
11
400.0 MW
GENERATOR
180.53
0.0
TO
22
1 193.33 0 0.0
TO
33
1 60.31 0 0.0
TO
55
1 -73.11 0 0.0
BUS
22
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
44

400.0 MW
261.00
1 -193.33 0 0.0
1 -67.67 0 0.0

BUS
33
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
55

400.0 MW
220.00
1 -60.31 0 0.0
1 -159.69 0 0.0

BUS
44
LOAD 1
TO
22
TO
55

400.0 MW
100.00
1 67.67 0 0.0
1 -167.67 0 0.0

BUS
55
GENERATOR
TO
11
TO
33
TO
44

400.0 MW
400.47
0.0
1 73.11 0 0.0
1 159.69 0 0.0
1 167.67 0 0.0

Pout Records
Base Case
Bus Flows
BUS
11
GENERATOR
TO
22
TO
33
TO
55

400.0 MW
180.00
0.0
1 192.62 0 0.0
1 60.38 0 0.0
1 -73.00 0 0.0

BUS
22
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
44

400.0 MW
260.00
1 -192.62 0
1 -67.38 0

0.0
0.0

BUS
33
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
55

400.0 MW
220.00
1 -60.38 0
1 -159.62 0

0.0
0.0

BUS
44
LOAD 1
TO
22
TO
55

400.0 MW
100.00
1 67.38 0
1 -167.38 0

0.0
0.0

BUS
55
GENERATOR
TO
11
TO
33
TO
44

400.0 MW
400.00
0.0
1 73.00 0 0.0
1 159.62 0 0.0
1 167.38 0 0.0

Seasonal Index for node 2


Seaslonal index for node 2 on line [1-2] = (193.33-192.62)*260

Line

Ue2l

1-2

Marginal Base
case
case
193.33
192.62

184.6

Ue2(1-2)

1-3

60.31

60.38

Ue2(1-3)

5-1

73.11

73.00

28.6

Ue2(5-1)

4-2

67.67

67.38

75.4

Ue2(4-2)

5-3

159.69

159.62

18.2

Ue2(5-3)

5-4

167.67

167.38

75.4

Ue2(5-4)

Increase 1 MW load at Bus 1

Pout Records Bus 1 INCR 1 MW


Bus Flows
BUS
11
400.0 MW
GENERATOR
181.00
0.0
TO
22
1 193.39 0 0.0
TO
33
1 60.54 0 0.0
TO
55
1 -72.93 0 0.0
BUS
22
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
44

400.0 MW
260.76
1 -193.39 0 0.0
1 -67.37 0 0.0

BUS
33
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
55

400.0 MW
220.24
1 -60.54 0 0.0
1 -159.70 0 0.0

BUS
44
LOAD 1
TO
22
TO
55

400.0 MW
100.00
1 67.37 0 0.0
1 -167.37 0 0.0

BUS
55
GENERATOR
TO
11
TO
33
TO
44

400.0 MW
400.00
0.0
1 72.93 0 0.0
1 159.70 0 0.0
1 167.37 0 0.0

Pout Records
Base Case
Bus Flows
BUS
11
GENERATOR
TO
22
TO
33
TO
55

400.0 MW
180.00
0.0
1 192.62 0 0.0
1 60.38 0 0.0
1 -73.00 0 0.0

BUS
22
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
44

400.0 MW
260.00
1 -192.62 0
1 -67.38 0

0.0
0.0

BUS
33
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
55

400.0 MW
220.00
1 -60.38 0
1 -159.62 0

0.0
0.0

BUS
44
LOAD 1
TO
22
TO
55

400.0 MW
100.00
1 67.38 0
1 -167.38 0

0.0
0.0

BUS
55
GENERATOR
TO
11
TO
33
TO
44

400.0 MW
400.00
0.0
1 73.00 0 0.0
1 159.62 0 0.0
1 167.38 0 0.0

Seasonal Index for node 1

Line

Ue1l

1-2

Marginal Base
case
case
193.39
192.62

138.6

Ue1(1-2)

1-3

60.54

60.38

28.8

Ue1(1-3)

5-1

72.93

73.00

Ue1(5-1)

4-2

67.37

67.38

Ue1(4-2)

5-3

159.70

159.62

14.4

Ue1(5-3)

5-4

167.37

167.38

Ue1(5-4)

Increase 1 MW load at Bus 3

Pout Records: 1MW INCR in bus 3 (load)


Bus Flows
BUS
11
400.0 MW
GENERATOR 1
180.20
0.0
TO
22
1 192.48 0 0.0
TO
33
1 60.81 0 0.0
TO
55
1 -73.09 0 0.0

Pout Records
Base Case
Bus Flows
BUS
11
GENERATOR
TO
22
TO
33
TO
55

400.0 MW
180.00
0.0
1 192.62 0 0.0
1 60.38 0 0.0
1 -73.00 0 0.0

BUS
22
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
44

400.0 MW
260.00
1 -192.48 0 0.0
1 -67.52 0 0.0

BUS
22
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
44

400.0 MW
260.00
1 -192.62 0
1 -67.38 0

0.0
0.0

BUS
33
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
55

400.0 MW
221.00
1 -60.81 0 0.0
1 -160.19 0 0.0

BUS
33
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
55

400.0 MW
220.00
1 -60.38 0
1 -159.62 0

0.0
0.0

BUS
44
LOAD 1
TO
22
TO
55

400.0 MW
100.00
1 67.52 0 0.0
1 -167.52 0 0.0

BUS
44
LOAD 1
TO
22
TO
55

400.0 MW
100.00
1 67.38 0
1 -167.38 0

0.0
0.0

BUS
55
GENERATOR
TO
11
TO
33
TO
44

400.0 MW
400.80
0.0
1 73.09 0 0.0
1 160.19 0 0.0
1 167.52 0 0.0

BUS
55
GENERATOR
TO
11
TO
33
TO
44

400.0 MW
400.00
0.0
1 73.00 0 0.0
1 159.62 0 0.0
1 167.38 0 0.0

Seasonal Index for node 3

Line

Ue3l

1-2

Marginal Base
case
case
192.48
192.62

Ue3(1-2)

1-3

60.81

60.38

94.6

Ue3(1-3)

5-1

73.09

73.00

19.8

Ue3(5-1)

4-2

67.52

67.38

30.8

Ue3(4-2)

5-3

160.19

159.62

125.4

Ue3(5-3)

5-4

167.52

167.38

30.8

Ue3(5-4)

Increase 1 MW load at Bus 4

Pout Records: 1MW INCR Bus 4


Bus Flows
BUS
11
400.0 MW
GENERATOR 1
180.00
0.0
TO
22
1 193.01 0 0.0
TO
33
1 60.23 0 0.0
TO
55
1 -73.24 0 0.0

Pout Records
Base Case
Bus Flows
BUS
11
GENERATOR
TO
22
TO
33
TO
55

400.0 MW
180.00
0.0
1 192.62 0 0.0
1 60.38 0 0.0
1 -73.00 0 0.0

BUS
22
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
44

400.0 MW
260.00
1 -193.01 0 0.0
1 -66.99 0 0.0

BUS
22
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
44

400.0 MW
260.00
1 -192.62 0
1 -67.38 0

0.0
0.0

BUS
33
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
55

400.0 MW
220.00
1 -60.23 0 0.0
1 -159.77 0 0.0

BUS
33
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
55

400.0 MW
220.00
1 -60.38 0
1 -159.62 0

0.0
0.0

BUS
44
LOAD 1
TO
22
TO
55

400.0 MW
101.00
1 66.99 0 0.0
1 -167.99 0 0.0

BUS
44
LOAD 1
TO
22
TO
55

400.0 MW
100.00
1 67.38 0
1 -167.38 0

0.0
0.0

BUS
55
GENERATOR
TO
11
TO
33
TO
44

400.0 MW
400.00
0.0
1 73.00 0 0.0
1 159.62 0 0.0
1 167.38 0 0.0

BUS
55
400.0 MW
GENERATOR 1
401.00
0.0
TO
11
1 73.24 0 0.0
TO
33
1 159.77 0 0.0
TO
44
1 167.99 0 0.0

Seasonal Index for node 4

Line

Ue4l

1-2

Marginal Base
case
case
193.01
192.62

39

Ue4(1-2)

1-3

60.23

60.38

Ue4(1-3)

5-1

73.24

73.00

24

Ue4(5-1)

4-2

66.99

67.38

Ue4(4-2)

5-3

159.77

159.62

15

Ue4(5-3)

5-4

167.99

167.38

61

Ue4(5-4)

Increase 1 MW load at Bus 5

Pout Records: bus 5 INCR 1MW


Bus Flows
BUS
11
400.0 MW
GENERATOR
180.00
0.0
TO
22
1 192.75 0 0.0
TO
33
1 60.46 0 0.0
TO
55
1 -73.22 0 0.0

Pout Records
Base Case
Bus Flows
BUS
11
GENERATOR
TO
22
TO
33
TO
55

400.0 MW
180.00
0.0
1 192.62 0 0.0
1 60.38 0 0.0
1 -73.00 0 0.0

BUS
22
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
44

400.0 MW
260.31
1 -192.75 0 0.0
1 -67.56 0 0.0

BUS
22
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
44

400.0 MW
260.00
1 -192.62 0
1 -67.38 0

0.0
0.0

BUS
33
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
55

400.0 MW
220.44
1 -60.46 0
1 -159.98 0

0.0
0.0

BUS
33
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
55

400.0 MW
220.00
1 -60.38 0
1 -159.62 0

0.0
0.0

BUS
44
LOAD 1
TO
22
TO
55

400.0 MW 1
100.25
1 67.56 0 0.0
1 -167.81 0 0.0

BUS
44
LOAD 1
TO
22
TO
55

400.0 MW
100.00
1 67.38 0
1 -167.38 0

0.0
0.0

BUS
55
GENERATOR
TO
11
TO
33
TO
44

400.0 MW
401.00
1 73.22 0
1 159.98 0
1 167.81 0

BUS
55
GENERATOR
TO
11
TO
33
TO
44

400.0 MW
400.00
0.0
1 73.00 0 0.0
1 159.62 0 0.0
1 167.38 0 0.0

1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0

Seasonal Index for node 5

Line

Ue4l

1-2

Marginal Base
case
case
192.75
192.62

52

Ue5(1-2)

1-3

60.46

60.38

32

Ue5(1-3)

5-1

73.22

73.00

88

Ue5(5-1)

4-2

67.56

67.38

72

Ue5(4-2)

5-3

159.98

159.62

144

Ue5(5-3)

5-4

167.81

167.38

172

Ue5(5-4)

Marginal Participation Factor( of node i in


line l):
Ueil / i Ueil

Line
1-2
1-3

Node/b Bus 2 Bus 3


us 1
0.3346 0.4457 0
0.1853 0

Bus 4

Bus 5

.0941

0.1255

0.6088 0

0.2059

1-5

0.1783 0.1234 0.1496 0.5486

2-4

0.4231 0.1728 0

3-5

0.0454 0.0574 0.3956 0.0473 0.4543

4-5

0.4040

0.2223 0.0908 0.1798 0.5071

Share Allocation of Generators


Load 1

Load 2

Load 3

Gen 1(bus
1) %

30

20

50

Gen 2(bus
2) %

40

25

35

Zone A
Generator #1

260 MW
0 Mvar

180 MW
0 Mvar

Bus 2

Bus 1

Line 1

Line 4

Line 2

Line 3

Bus 3

100 MW
0 Mvar
Bus 4

220 MW

Line 6
Line 5

0 Mvar

Bus 5
slack

400 MW
0 Mvar

Line Cost Information


Line

from bus

to bus

length in KM

Cost of line (in Crs)

160

160

112

112

200

200

80

80

152

152

99

99

Total=803 Cr
Line cost considered as 1 crore/km for indicative purposes only

Calculation of Uniform Charges


= Total Transmission Charges/(Sum of approved
Injection+Sum of approved Withdrawal)
=803/(400+180+220+260+100)
=69.22 lakhs/MW
For bus 1 =(69.22*180)=125 Cr
For bus 2=(69.22*260) =180 Cr
For bus 3=(69.22*220) =152 Cr
For bus 4=(69.22*100) = 69 Cr
For bus 5=(69.22*400) =277 Cr

Cost allocation to nodes based


on marginal participation
Nodes

Marginal
Participation
case
(Cost in Rs
Cr)

Uniform
Charges
(Cost in Rs
Cr)

50 % Marginal
Participation
50% Uniform
Charges

PoC rates
Rs Lakh
/MW/mont
h

Node/Bus
1

75

125

100

4.62

Node/Bus
2

185

180

182.5

5.85

Node/Bus
3

162

152

157

5.95

Node/Bus
4

70

69

69.5

5.79

Node/Bus
5

311

277

294

6.13

Total

803

803

803

Generator shares
Generator

Generator Node 1
% share

Generator Node 5
% share

Loads

Load bus 2

10

50

Load bus 3

30

30

Load bus 4

60

20

Node
s

MPTrace

UC

50 %
MP &
50%
UC

PoC
rates
Rs Lakh
/MW
/month

Monthly
Charges to
be paid Rs
Lakhs/mont
h based on
share

Node/
Bus 1

75

125

100

4.62
(3.47)

Generator
node

Node/
Bus 2

185

180

182.5

5.85
(5.93)

2830

Node/
Bus 3

162

5.95
(6.14)

2294

Node/
Bus 4

70

5.79
(5.83)

1568

Node/
Bus 5

311

277

294

6.13
(6.48)

Generator
node

Total

803

803

803

152
69

157
69.5

Monthly
Charges to
be paid Rs
Lakhs/month
based on
trace

2905
2596
1192

Charges to be paid = own drawal*drawal PoC of node+share*generator capacity*injection


PoC of generator bus
(Figures in brackets are based on MP-Trace only)

Present Issues

There is no internationally adopted best


common method for allocation of
transmission costs.. All methods have
their pros & cons
Worldwide a combination of methods is
used for allocation such as postage stamp,
marginal/nodal pricing, marginal
participation, average participation, MWMile, peak based, game theory etc
Requires not only technical expertise but
also Econimics concepts such as marginal
price, social welfare, etc

While postage stamp method is the most


easiest to understand, it does not capture
the congestion costs.
While marginal participation has some
degree of technical backing it is complex
to understand and implement
Selection of slack bus/responding nodes in
marginal participation is a contentious
issue.

While we are rightly concerned with


congestion. What if there is over
capacity/stranded assets in a corridor?
What if the constructed lines remain lightly
loaded for most part of the year due to
error in planning or change in load
generation scenario over time? What is
the limit of reliability costs?

In Flow based methods the base case


load generation is very important.. More
so when the tariff of assets vary widely
50 % Uniform charges distort the
locational signals
Slabbing further distorts the results of
marginal participation

Whether a generator/supplier or
Load/Consumer is to be penalized for its
geographical location?
-----generation zones are predetermined
based on availability of resources
----load zones/industrial belts are also result
of historical development, resource
availability
Whether generator or Consumer be
penalized due to asymmetries in
transmission network created during
historical development of ISTS ?

Future Concerns
Integration of Renewables in the Grid
---run of the river hydro, wind and solar run
on very low PLF. However, transmission
must be developed for entire capacity.
---higher transmission cost/unit due to low
PLF which is not under the control of
generator may result in disincentive for
growth of renewables

The issue of integration of renewables is


being debated worldwide now
Can such transmission projects be funded
by Government under NAPCC?

Changes in Sharing Regulations


contemplated in the third
amendment regulations

Transmission charges to be calculated


based on peak scenario rather than
average scenario
---In selecting those operating scenarios it is
important to recognise that the operating
conditions that impose most stress on
particular network elements may occur at
times other than for system peak demand.

Discontinuation of uniform charges


Discontinuation of slabbing
Computation based on full basic network
rather than truncated network
Proportional compensation for use of state
lines carrying interstate power

PoC charges under peak


conditions

Generator #1

390 MW
0 Mvar

180 MW
0 Mvar

Bus 2

Bus 1

Line 1

Line 4

Line 2

Line 3

Bus 3

100 MW
0 Mvar
Bus 4

220 MW

Line 6
Line 5

0 Mvar

Bus 5
slack

530 MW
0 Mvar

Pout Records: NEW BASE CASE::150% peak drawal


at node/bus-2---supplied by generator node 5
Bus Flows
BUS
11
400.0 MW
GENERATOR
180.00
0.0
TO
22
1 251.79 0 0.0
TO
33
1 37.27 0 0.0
TO
55
1 -109.06 0 0.0
BUS
22
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
44

400.0 MW
390.00
1 -251.79 0
1 -138.21 0

0.0
0.0

BUS
33
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
55

400.0 MW
220.00
1 -37.27 0
1 -182.73 0

0.0
0.0

BUS
44
LOAD 1
TO
22
TO
55

400.0 MW
100.00
1 138.21 0
1 -238.21 0

0.0
0.0

BUS
55
GENERATOR
TO
11
TO
33
TO
44

400.0 MW
530.00
0.0
1 109.06 0 0.0
1 182.73 0 0.0
1 238.21 0 0.0

Load (bus
2)
156.78

Load (bus
3)
23.22

Load (bus
4)
0

40

11

Gen
2(bus5)
%

232.74

197.26

100

60

89

100

Total

390

220

100

Gen
1(bus1)
%

Pout Records:: INCR 1 MW at bus 1


Bus Flows
BUS
11
400.0 MW
GENERATOR
181.00
0.0
TO
22
1 252.64 0 0.0
TO
33
1 37.37 0 0.0
TO
55
1 -109.01 0 0.0

Pout Records: NEW BASE CASE::150% peak drawal


at node/bus-2
Bus Flows
BUS
11
400.0 MW
GENERATOR
180.00
0.0
TO
22
1 251.79 0 0.0
TO
33
1 37.27 0 0.0
TO
55
1 -109.06 0 0.0

BUS
22
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
44

400.0 MW
390.87
1 -252.64 0 0.0
1 -138.23 0 0.0

BUS
22
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
44

400.0 MW
390.00
1 -251.79 0
1 -138.21 0

0.0
0.0

BUS
33
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
55

400.0 MW
220.13
1 -37.37 0 0.0
1 -182.76 0 0.0

BUS
33
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
55

400.0 MW
220.00
1 -37.27 0
1 -182.73 0

0.0
0.0

BUS
44
LOAD 1
TO
22
TO
55

400.0 MW
100.00
1 138.23 0 0.0
1 -238.23 0 0.0

BUS
44
LOAD 1
TO
22
TO
55

400.0 MW
100.00
1 138.21 0
1 -238.21 0

0.0
0.0

BUS
55
GENERATOR
TO
11
TO
33
TO
44

400.0 MW
530.00
0.0
1 109.01 0 0.0
1 182.76 0 0.0
1 238.23 0 0.0

BUS
55
GENERATOR
TO
11
TO
33
TO
44

400.0 MW
530.00
0.0
1 109.06 0 0.0
1 182.73 0 0.0
1 238.21 0 0.0

Pout Records:: INCR 1 MW at bus 2


Bus Flows
BUS
11
400.0
GENERATOR
180.40
0.0
TO
22
1 252.44 0 0.0
TO
33
1 37.17 0 0.0
TO
55
1 -109.21 0 0.0
BUS
22
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
44

400.0 MW
391.00
1 -252.44 0 0.0
1 -138.56 0 0.0

BUS
33
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
55

400.0 MW
220.00
1 -37.17 0 0.0
1 -182.83 0 0.0

BUS
44
LOAD 1
TO
22
TO
55

400.0 MW
100.00
1 138.56 0 0.0
1 -238.56 0 0.0

BUS
55
GENERATOR
TO
11
TO
33
TO
44

400.0 MW
530.60
1 109.21 0 0.0
1 182.83 0 0.0
1 238.56 0 0.0

0.0

Pout Records: NEW BASE CASE::150% peak drawal


at node/bus-2
Bus Flows
BUS
11
400.0 MW
GENERATOR
180.00
0.0
TO
22
1 251.79 0 0.0
TO
33
1 37.27 0 0.0
TO
55
1 -109.06 0 0.0
BUS
22
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
44

400.0 MW
390.00
1 -251.79 0
1 -138.21 0

0.0
0.0

BUS
33
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
55

400.0 MW
220.00
1 -37.27 0
1 -182.73 0

0.0
0.0

BUS
44
LOAD 1
TO
22
TO
55

400.0 MW
100.00
1 138.21 0
1 -238.21 0

0.0
0.0

BUS
55
GENERATOR
TO
11
TO
33
TO
44

400.0 MW
530.00
0.0
1 109.06 0 0.0
1 182.73 0 0.0
1 238.21 0 0.0

Pout Records:: 1 MW INCR at Bus 3


Bus Flows
BUS
11
400.0 MW
GENERATOR 1
180.11
0.0
TO
22
1 251.61 0 0.0
TO
33
1 37.68 0 0.0
TO
55
1 -109.18 0 0.0

Pout Records: NEW BASE CASE::150% peak drawal


at node/bus-2
Bus Flows
BUS
11
400.0 MW
GENERATOR
180.00
0.0
TO
22
1 251.79 0 0.0
TO
33
1 37.27 0 0.0
TO
55
1 -109.06 0 0.0

BUS
22
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
44

400.0 MW
390.00
1 -251.61 0 0.0
1 -138.39 0 0.0

BUS
22
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
44

400.0 MW
390.00
1 -251.79 0
1 -138.21 0

0.0
0.0

BUS
33
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
55

400.0 MW
221.00
1 -37.68 0 0.0
1 -183.32 0 0.0

BUS
33
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
55

400.0 MW
220.00
1 -37.27 0
1 -182.73 0

0.0
0.0

BUS
44
LOAD 1
TO
22
TO
55

400.0 MW
100.00
1 138.39 0 0.0
1 -238.39 0 0.0

BUS
44
LOAD 1
TO
22
TO
55

400.0 MW
100.00
1 138.21 0
1 -238.21 0

0.0
0.0

BUS
55
GENERATOR
TO
11
TO
33
TO
44

400.0 MW
530.00
0.0
1 109.06 0 0.0
1 182.73 0 0.0
1 238.21 0 0.0

BUS
55
400.0 MW
GENERATOR 1
530.89
0.0
TO
11
1 109.18 0 0.0
TO
33
1 183.32 0 0.0
TO
44
1 238.39 0 0.0

Pout Records
Bus Flows
BUS
11
400.0 MW
GENERATOR 1
180.00
0.0
TO
22
1 252.19 0 0.0
TO
33
1 37.11 0 0.0
TO
55
1 -109.30 0 0.0

Pout Records: NEW BASE CASE::150% peak drawal


at node/bus-2
Bus Flows
BUS
11
400.0 MW
GENERATOR
180.00
0.0
TO
22
1 251.79 0 0.0
TO
33
1 37.27 0 0.0
TO
55
1 -109.06 0 0.0

BUS
22
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
44

400.0 MW
390.00
1 -252.19 0 0.0
1 -137.81 0 0.0

BUS
22
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
44

400.0 MW
390.00
1 -251.79 0
1 -138.21 0

0.0
0.0

BUS
33
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
55

400.0 MW
220.00
1 -37.11 0 0.0
1 -182.89 0 0.0

BUS
33
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
55

400.0 MW
220.00
1 -37.27 0
1 -182.73 0

0.0
0.0

BUS
44
LOAD 1
TO
22
TO
55

400.0 MW
101.00
1 137.81 0
1 -238.81 0

BUS
44
LOAD 1
TO
22
TO
55

400.0 MW
100.00
1 138.21 0
1 -238.21 0

0.0
0.0

BUS
55
GENERATOR
TO
11
TO
33
TO
44

400.0 MW
531.00
0.0
1 109.30 0 0.0
1 182.89 0 0.0
1 238.81 0 0.0

BUS
55
GENERATOR
TO
11
TO
33
TO
44

400.0 MW
530.00
0.0
1 109.06 0 0.0
1 182.73 0 0.0
1 238.21 0 0.0

0.0
0.0

Pout Records
Bus Flows
BUS
11
400.0 MW
GENERATOR 1
180.00
0.0
TO
22
1 251.98 0 0.0
TO
33
1 37.30 0 0.0
TO
55
1 -109.29 0 0.0

Pout Records: NEW BASE CASE::150% peak drawal


at node/bus-2
Bus Flows
BUS
11
400.0 MW
GENERATOR
180.00
0.0
TO
22
1 251.79 0 0.0
TO
33
1 37.27 0 0.0
TO
55
1 -109.06 0 0.0

BUS
22
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
44

400.0 MW
390.44
1 -251.98 0 0.0
1 -138.46 0 0.0

BUS
22
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
44

400.0 MW
390.00
1 -251.79 0
1 -138.21 0

0.0
0.0

BUS
33
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
55

400.0 MW
220.37
1 -37.30 0 0.0
1 -183.07 0 0.0

BUS
33
LOAD 1
TO
11
TO
55

400.0 MW
220.00
1 -37.27 0
1 -182.73 0

0.0
0.0

BUS
44
LOAD 1
TO
22
TO
55

400.0 MW
100.19
1 138.46 0 0.0
1 -238.65 0 0.0

BUS
44
LOAD 1
TO
22
TO
55

400.0 MW
100.00
1 138.21 0
1 -238.21 0

0.0
0.0

BUS
55
GENERATOR
TO
11
TO
33
TO
44

400.0 MW
531.00
0.0
1 109.29 0 0.0
1 183.07 0 0.0
1 238.65 0 0.0

BUS
55
GENERATOR
TO
11
TO
33
TO
44

400.0 MW
530.00
0.0
1 109.06 0 0.0
1 182.73 0 0.0
1 238.21 0 0.0

Node/b Bus 2
us 1
Line
1-2
1-3

Bus 3

Bus 4

Bus 5

0.280

0.463

0.000

0.073

0.184

0.145

0.000

0.727

0.000

0.128

0.000

0.253

0.114

0.104

0.528

0.012

0.437

0.127

0.000

0.424

0.015

0.105

0.350

0.043

0.487

0.008

0.289

0.084

0.127

0.493

1-5
2-4
3-5
4-5

Marginal Line Participation Factors peak case and


earlier/average case for line 1--2

0.5
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25

peak case

0.2

earlier case

0.15
0.1
0.05
0
Node/bus 1

Bus 2

Bus 3

Bus 4

Bus 5

Total charges allocated to


nodes peak case earlier case
350

300

250

200
peak case
earlier case

150

100

50

0
Node/bus 1

Bus 2

Bus 3

Bus 4

Bus 5

Tabulated data for earlier case


and peak case
Node

Earlier
cost
allocated
to node

Peak
%
scenario change
cost

Earlier
cost/
Lakh/MW
/month
MP

Earlier
cost/
Lakh/MW/
month
MP+UC

Peak
Scenario
cost/
Lakh/MW/mo
nth

75

61

18.66

3.47

4.62

2.82

185

218

17.83

5.93

5.85

4.66

162

157

3.08

6.14

5.95

5.94

70

51

27.14

5.83

5.79

4.25

311

316

1.61

6.48

6.13

4.97

While the load at bus 2 had increased 1.5 times the total cost allocated to the node
has increased only 1.18 times( 1.19 for MP+UC)
cost/MW/Month will go down (as MW increased). New entrants/ST customers incentivized
Charges allocated to a node will change only if due to it flow in different lines change.
Otherwise the charge may remain same under peak scenario also. May also reduce.

From CERC sharing of ISTS charges


(third amendment) draft

TABLE 2

DIC

Withdrawal/Load
PoC Charges

Scaled PoC
Charges

45,79,42,697

50,45,52,461

18,96,39,554

20,89,41215

TABLE 3
Zone

Uniform Charges
(UC)\(Rs./Month)=Unifo
rm Rate*LTA

Scaled PoC
Charges
Rs/Month

50% UC and
50% PoC
Rs./Month

25,22,12,087

50,45,52,461 37,83,82,274 2,668

1,41,822

16,44,90,088

20,89,41,215 18,66,46,847 1,741

1,07,280

50.46/20.89= 2.42 ; 37.84/18.66 = 2.07

LTA (MW)

Withdrawal
Charges
(Rs/MW/Month)

TABLE- 4
LTA
(MW)

Slab Rate
(Rs/MW/Month)

Actual Usage
(Rs/ Month)

Payment
(Rs/ Month)

DIC

Drawal
(MW)

4989

2668

1,09,544

45,79,42,697 29,22,63,392 (-) 36.2%

1414

1741

1,09,544

18,96,39,554 19,07,16,104

Variation

0.56%

50.46/20.89= 2.42 ; 37.84/18.66 = 2.07 ; 29.23/19.07 = 1.53 ??

TABLE-5

Load
PoC
(Rs./MW
/Month)

Zone

Generation
(MW)

Load
(MW)

Generation
Charges
(Rs.)

Load
Charges
(MW)

LTA
(Generation)
(MW)

LTA
(Demand)
(MW)

Generation
PoC
(Rs./MW/
Month)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

(9)

194

29
29160

16,64,638

2,160,51,386

280

4784

5945

45166

TABLE-6

Zone

Generation
PoC
(Rs./MW/
Month)

Load
PoC
(Rs./MW
/Month)

Software Computed

8,594

74,229

Generation
PoC
(Rs./MW/
Month)

Load
PoC
(Rs./MW
/Month)

LTA Based

5,945

45,166

Generation
PoC
(Rs./MW/
Month)

Load
PoC
(Rs./MW/
Month)

After 50% Uniform


charge and 50% PoC
application

50,547

72,154

Generation
PoC
(Rs./MW/
Month)

Load
PoC
(Rs./M
W/Mo
nth)

After Slabs

79,544

79,544

TABLE-7
Sl.No.

State /DIC

% Allocation

BIHAR

42.89%

JHARKHAND

8.13%

DVC

0.31%

ODISHA

31.8% plus temp allocation

WEST BENGAL

9.1% plus temp allocation

SIKKIM

2.4

TAMIL NADU

0.85%

NER

3.22%

TABLE-8
Sl.No.

State /DIC

% as per participation factor

ODISHA

82.97

DVC

12.1

WEST BENGAL

4.93

Thank you

Potrebbero piacerti anche