Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
FACTA UNIVERSITATIS
SERIES ARCHITECTURE AND CIVIL ENGINEERING
Vol. 7, No 2, 2009
UNIVERSITY OF NI
FACTA UNIVERSITATIS
SERIES ARCHITECTURE AND CIVIL ENGINEERING
Vol. 7, No 2, 2009
UNIVERSITY OF NI
2. uranovi P.: Organizacija upravljanja projektima, Izgradnja No 1/96, Beograd, 1996, str. 45-52.
3. ivkovi D.: Influence of front excavation on the state and deformity of montage lining of hydraulic
References should be quoted in the text by the corresponding number in square brackets.
The manuscripts in above form should be submitted to the Editor of the Series both in three printed
copies, and in electronic form prepared by MS Word for Windows. The manuscript in electronic form should
be sent on a floppy, compact disk or forwarded by e-mail to facta@ni.ac.rs, dsfacta@ni.ac.rs,
stojicd@junis.ni.ac.rs or stojicd@gaf.ni.ac.rs.
FACTA UNIVERSITATIS
Series: Architecture and Civil Engineering Vol. 7, No 2, 2009, pp. 107 - 120
DOI: 10.2298/FUACE0801001S
Abstract. The interactive relationship between psychology and architecture is still being
neglected when the possibilities potentially obtainable by perceiving and memorizing
architectural forms and space are considered . The contemporary architects, or a part of
them are well aware of these possibilities while designing their buildings, and it is of great
interest to ascertain how professionals and ordinary people perceived and memorized
buildings and sites through history.
The paper presents certain psychological methods that could be very helpful in this research.
One of those methods have The Gestalt principle is the initial method of one such method,
because the memorizing process strongly relies on the concept of "crystallization" of a
perceived event with the passage of time. Some examples, well known through building
history have been analyzed and compared in order to demonstrate how the interaction
between psychology and architectural forms and spaces.
1. INTRODUCTION
Construction always reflect a method and approach of an individual, even when it is governed by the strict rules of a style. It due to building being a conscious human act, and
doubtlessly influences modeling of space and forms, apart from the dictate of the given conditions. The individuality is manifested as a personal response of a designer, contemplating
about each separate task. The reasons that an individual-constructor bears in mind, are not
necessarily familiar to those who perceive that space and form. Professional motives guiding
the trade have always been different from those making ordinary man, user and observer establish an set analytic relation towards objects and the built environment. The contemporary
architects, as a rule, place their object of interest in "the center of the world" and they are
Received April 11, 2009
108
R. ALIHODI, N. KURTOVI-FOLI
most often convinced that, observers experience the structures and built environment that
they create in the same way they do, as their creators. It has not always been the case
throughout history of building and many builders, during their work, were guided by how
anonymous observers would experience their work [1].
Such analyticity has in time formed in professionals an impression that the rest of the
population equally perceives and memorizes architectural space and form. However, it is
a fact that an ordinary man has always established a somewhat different relation and size
order while adopting the perceived. It is a certain natural code that differs from the code
of professional builders. Apart from the elementary motifs of orientation and awareness of
space, it greatly depends on the cultural level and civilization an observer belongs to.
To live permanently in one environment and to dwell temporarily in another, means to
be aware of oneself, other people and the surrounding environment. Establishing of certain man-nature space relations is a crucial question of survival, but certainly not only of
that. A man, as a complex creature, possessing multi-layered experiences, forms a certain
image in one's memory, the aesthetic one among the others. Aesthetic image is very important and all people possess it, both in the spheres of conscious and unconscious. As
such, it determines our attitude regarding the architectural space and form, qualifying it as
pleasant or unpleasant. Aesthetic experience regarding the perceived space or architectural form certainly influences the perception level and the memory intensity. To perceive
something in one's environment, in full complexity of the mentioned act, means to establish a certain multiple relation. Perception and memory is not only a question of orientation
in space, even though it is very often the main, unconscious, and in an unfamiliar environment, even a very pronounced emphasized perception motif. Every perception, apart
from the orientation factor, definitely forms certain impressions of the object of perception.
Perception of the external, entire world comprises observation of everything happening around us, as well as of the reaction to those impulses created in human's conscience.
It is the essential premise of this paper, focused on the already determined perception
segment the built-up environment.
2. PSYCHOLOGY AS A RESEARCH PREMISE
Perception, as a process, precedes memorizing of the perceived being thus its imperative condition. "Perception is a complex physical process that can briefly be defined as
immediate knowledge of objects and events based on data collected by senses and other
cognitive processes as well" [2]. For instance, it is a fact that the totality of environment is
not perceived automatically and as a whole, in the way a photographic camera does. Some
people perceive and memorize in a much more comprehensive way than the others, even
though they observe the same buildings they use or just pass by them. Regardless of how
many people perceive and memorize the things they see, an entity itself should emanate
the characteristics of the architectural space and forms that are the "backbone" of the perceived. That is the first condition for them to be stored in human memory. "Architectural
practice has continuously been plagued by the dilemma regarding how to reconcile our
innate feeling for space with a thoughtless heaping up of structures imposed by the property market. The problem of visual space perception made psychologists and art theoreticians pay attention to it, i.e. architecture. It is worth reminding of this, since the conditions that define the perception phenomena have been discovered step by step." [3]
109
The previously stated facts are a basis of one of the fundamental subjects of the research, which is finding of the causes that activate the perception process, as far as architectural space and form are concerned. Discovering the regularities making certain architectural forms and spaces be a subject of observers' attention, and thus be memorized, is a
process that lasts quite long time and it has been a matter of interest of many persons in
the course of, who dealt with it in different ways [4].
The memorizing process itself has several levels in the sense of information retention
(sensory, short-term, long-term), as proved by the perception psychology. It is the motifs
which determine the treatment of the perceived architectural structure or space by the human memory. Although a wish to make a structure remarkable and to be permanently remembered is not a basic goal of every architect, it is an unconscious intention.. Vernacular architecture is a good example, since there the elements that are not just utilitarian can
be seen, and they are there to distinguish an object and make it memorable, sometimes in
a very inexpertly way. The answers to the question how to achieve this are numerable and
can be rather simply conceived resorting to the psychology as an ancillary discipline.
It is known that, up to a certain level, all people can orient in space and recognize architectural objects, towns, squares The thing that is specific for individuals is the level
of perception. Some people are able to present the images experienced better than others,
even up to the level of a great accuracy, while the others are certainly not. Those are rare
qualities that are supposed to be possessed by architects and those close to visual arts.
However, they are not the subject of research, but the interest is focused on the elements
of a perceived image in the built environment that are essentially significant for attention
and memory.
Fundamental perception psychology researches, transferred to the field of architecture
as a profession, can serve to determine how the perceived architectural space and forms
are being registered in human memory with the passage of time.
In thousands of years of construction tradition , many millions of structures have been
built. Even though concentrated on the complex issues of the purpose, construction and
style, architects have, nevertheless, always strived to make their designs distinguishable,
prominent and remembered as long as possible. Searching for fundamental criteria that
would help them realize this, skilful professionals stood out since they managed to distinguish good and bad, fine and unsightly architecture. They were able to do it owing to the
universal laws that architecture is ruled by, as prevalently an art of form and spatial
shaping, as well as any other art it can be in synergy with.
Modern psychologists and philosophers reach into the origin of those laws, and the
general statement is that there are certain laws obeyed by all art, sculpture and architectural works that are evaluated as good or successful both by experts and other observers.
Based on up-to-date information, it can be concluded that there must have been principles
by which certain architectural space and form were perceived, and thus their characteristics are imposed as memorizing factors. Basic questions, such as for example, what the
reasons for a certain architectural space (inner or external),, architectural form or built
environment are to be perceived, whether everything perceived, as a part of a built environment, is remembered, why something of the perceived "material" stays remembered,
and why something does not, what principles for the process of architectural space and form
memorizing are applied and how the memorized material is interpreted in human mind in
time, are nowadays answered by psychology [5]. In order to solve problems and find
110
R. ALIHODI, N. KURTOVI-FOLI
high-quality answer, it is doubtlessly necessary to know and to apply two very important
psychology branches, which are the following:
Psychology of Perception and
Psychology of Memorizing
Achievements of psychology in these fields can serve as a relevant basis and a source
of regulations of perception and memorizing processes and mechanisms. As for perception and memorizing of space and form, a branch of psychology, known as "Gestalt" psychology, has had major achievement. This psychology branch has defined very convincing principles of perception organization, as well as certain rules that "recall" the perceived
form to memory. That is the principle that is called a "trace" in Gestalt-psychology.
The thing that is especially important in the process of memorizing and reproduction
of the perceived, and precious for architecture as a profession in educational terms , is gestalt defined principle of "scheming" of the perceived and memorized, especially through
time. Human mind can use all the economical advantages in the process of reproduction
of the perceived form and space, making easily memorable structural concepts out of
space schemes.
General and fundamental knowledge of psychology, in the field of perception and
memorizing, can be applied to the essence of architectural creation: defining space and
form that fulfill certain function. In modern psychology well-known are the rules motivating an observer (and directing processes) while perceiving and memorizing. Applied to
architectural space and form they can provide a potential to predict processes of perception and memorizing, as early as in the design phase .
3. CREATIVITY METHODS I ARCHITECTURE STIMULATING BETTER PERCEPTION AND
MEMORIZING OF AN OBSERVER
Researching building construction process through history, it can be concluded that
many creators, even before psychology became a scientific discipline, researched and had
every good knowledge of certain methods by which they could make a building of a great
value that is rapidly and effectively perceived and remembered for a long time. Apart
from exaggerated size, monumentality, conceptual difference in respect to the environment, builders could choose from a multitude of subtle methods they used to accomplish
the goal of making a building distinguished and memorable. That process was not simple
and required resourcefulness, imagination and audacity from the builders together with a
good knowledge regarding construction materials, building techniques, structural systems
and style attributes appreciated in certain epochs. We do not possess full knowledge of
all those creativity processes segments through history of construction, but contemporary
knowledge of processes explained by psychology helps to connect the missing links and
to make that process clear almost entirely.
Regarding the scope of historical architectural development, the aim of the paper work
is to point to some examples that are very specific and that can be useful as an experience
in modern designing. The first successful design of building standing out from the environment, and imposing itself to an observer by its characteristics as a special piece of
work that was visible from a great distance and that was memorable due to its form, the
first time expressed in construction generally is step-shaped pyramid in Saqqara, built in
111
the III millennium BC. The first known architect, Imhotep (2635-2595), was respected for his wisdom as a writer, astronomer, shaman (wizard) and healer (doctor). For
him, architecture was one of the fields he ruled, as well as a challenge to express his mind
capabilities. He conceived a step-shaped pyramid for the grave of his patron, the king
Zosser, piling up vertically several mastabas to create a monumental tower almost 60m
above the west river Nile bank. In such a way the pyramid was distinguished by its height
and unusual appearance, and became remarkable for immediate perception and memorizing. The pyramid and the whole complex surrounding it were made of a cut stone the
first big masonry structure of the Old Empire. The change from brick and timber architecture of into architecture of stone was a real revolution in construction and it was also
the quality that left a strong impression. The size of a building in this case is not the primary architectural quality, but yet from the moment it came into being it was an object for
attention focusing and a reason for memorizing, since it set itself as a space and cultural
model for the whole Egyptian society at the time. Zosser's pyramid was made and it survived as a part of the collective memory of people in the world up to nowadays.
112
R. ALIHODI, N. KURTOVI-FOLI
The first law is universal and very important, so it was occasionally thought that applying
only that law beauty of a building could be created, i.e. in every piece of art work.
More than 2000 years ago this principle was already known to Ancient creators, and
particularly well known today are the attitudes of Pythagoras and Aristotle [6]. Later on
on in history, many philosophers applied the same law when they continued discussing
beauty. Modern, free interpretation of that law is as follows: "Beauty is a characteristic of
every object made up of different elements that create unity of effects regarding observers
sensations." Investigation of the meaning of this R statement is very complex, though the
"formula" itself sounds simple. The definition indirectly refers to perception and it does
not include the whole field of what can be considered beauty. Emotional and associative
values of beauty are set aside, since it is perceived only as an external quality, as a purely
perceptible form. Unity is a building quality by which it expresses itself as finite and organically integral.. This quality is possessed by every building perceived by an observer
at first sight as the unitary composition. Regardless of how complex parts of a building
may be, how spacious it is, if the complex parts immediately take their place as an integral
part of the whole, the building is unitary and concerned successful.
Keeping the basic outline of a building simple, with regular repetition of the main
motifs, tympanums, stairs, towers, a unity of complexity is created, so the building fulfils
the first beauty requirement, perception of the whole at first sight, which is known as e
pluribus unum (unity of multitude) in Latin. Certain amount of complexity stems not only
from practical, but also from aesthetic reasons, since uniqueness and variety are necessary
as perception factors both in architecture and other arts. It is practically impossible to design
a building that is not complex. Connecting different parts and elements into whole is,
however, a big problem imposed to creators throughout the history.
Though the ancient civilizations of Egypt and Mesopotamia had already applied certain principles of building shaping, having an aim for architectural form to be perceived
by many, it was only in Ancient Greece that artists were explicitly advised how to create
so as to have their works perceived as qualitative and beautiful, and thus memorable by a
great number of observers. Certain authors' glory was based just on oral, rarely written,
spreading of their works description that some people had a chance to watch and remember. Such buildings were made thanks to adequate application of the following principles:
balance
rhythm
good proportions
climax (peak or centre of a building)
harmony
Some later authors added eurhythmics to the stated principles, but eurhythmics in fact
represents a result of the stated principles interaction [7]. Vitruvius wrote about all these
mentioned principles in his text, but not at one place [8].
The law of balance can be defined as follows: every building should be composed in a
way that its parts of both parts of imaginative line express visually the same weight. The
simplest application of this law can be recognized in symmetrical objects, and it is barely
ever achieved in asymmetrical ones.
In this case, symmetry is defined as an exact ratio of a building's two halves, that can
exist only if that building is perfectly balanced. Symmetrical buildings can be systemized
113
in accordance with more or less complex schemes. The more motifs, the harder it gets,
since human eye can perceive the present balance, which is the element of beauty in the
whole, with difficulty.
The simplest form of all symmetrical forms is certainly the one that has front surface
made as a flat square or rectangular front, with or without tympanum.
Fig. 3 Tripartite schemes: A. the middle part bigger, lower wings, B. the middle part
lower, extremely high side parts, C. the middle part and side parts almost equal
The most formal and monumental shape was used for big and important building and
it was made of the main central part, connecting elements and emphasized side parts.
Even when using these combinations, builders were at risk of not creating a balanced
whole and thus confuse an observer's eye in terms of what to focus on as the whole.
114
R. ALIHODI, N. KURTOVI-FOLI
115
116
R. ALIHODI, N. KURTOVI-FOLI
repeated, and every part is varied in rhythmic dependence on the other. Each of these
wholes (units) is repeated along the entire height of the building and in that exceptional
rhythmic repeating there can be found an excuse for a high attraction level of observers
who easily remember the stated motifs as architectural value of this building.
117
From a broader perspective, it is clear they are closely related to the following law according to which a building must be harmonized so as to be beautiful. There must also be
harmony of expression and, to certain amount, harmony of style: shortly, no element of a
beautiful building is designed in a way that it looks pronouncedly diverse, alone and separated from the whole, since if there is no architectural unity, perception of a building is
made more difficult.
4. SEARCH FOR ARCHITECTURAL FORM AND SPACE PERCEPTION PHENOMENA
Beside efforts to make buildings inflict by their characteristics that an observer effectively perceives and remembers by use of projecting methods, that is to say by applying
certain principles, many authors have tried to examine mechanisms by which human mind
perceives and remembers shapes and space relations. Out of a great number of those who,
more or less, examined this phenomenon, Leonardo da Vinci (1453-1519) stands out; he
was of inquiring spirit and had a sharp perception of many natural phenomena , which he
tried to write down and explain. When Leonardo da Vinci was 36 years old, in 1489 year,
he examined a universal symbol of mortality human skull. The three papers, kept in
Windsor, there are eight studies of skull profiles, intersections, views from different
corners and from above. Different studies point out different detail, position of face blood
vessels, relation between the eye and maxillary opening (eyehole jaw bone); in the others he shows cranium hole and set ways of inter-cranium nerves and vessels. In the accompanying writings there can be found notes on this paper work theme that are less scientific and more metaphysical. One of the studies shows a skull framed in the proportional scheme, and next to the drawing there is a note "...at the place where the a-m line
cuts the c-b line, there is the confluence of all the senses ".
118
R. ALIHODI, N. KURTOVI-FOLI
119
5. CONCLUSION
A major topic of these studies is the reconstruction of the ways in which architectural
form and space were created to be perceived by past societies. For achieving the results we
ought to approach the project of building archaeology of perception and memorizing. One of
the aims of such a research is the evaluation of the effects of architectural and space features
on past human observers. This paper argue that a possible strategy for studying these
dimensions of architectural history could be based on the systematic analysis of the creation
such visual features of the buildings that they must remain deeply in the memory of the observers and in the characterization of the scenic effects and vistas related to them. A detailed
analysis of the pattern of location of buildings, and of their visibility and inter-visibility,
massing and style allows us to recognize certain regularities which display an intention to
take account of architectural form and space by provoking dramatic artificial effects. In such
a way, we could approach a phenomenology of historic perception without falling into
merely subjective solutions. This study is based on a brief systematic review of some well
known and universal aesthetic principles analyzed through the quality of perception and
memory of the buildings designed by applying those principles.
The conclusion supports the interactive relation of psychology of the observer and architecture even when those relations were not fully recognized by the authors of the built
environment. It is seen that by the Gestalt rules of the perception organization the perception processes could best explained even the historical architectural space and form, as
well as the urban space. The same could be concluded for the process of memory which
strongly relies on Gestalt principle of "crystallization" of the perceived excitement with
the time that passes.
REFERENCES
1. This paper presents the first part of a study on perception and memorizing phenomena dealing with
historical buildings and sites. Second part will be on perception and memorizing phenomena as a tool in
contemporary design process.
2. Miloevi, S.: Percepcija, panja i motorna aktivnost, Zavod za udbenike i nastavna sredstva, Beograd,
2002. 73.
3. Zevi, B. : Koncept za kontraistoriju arhitekture, 112
4. Barber. P, Leg. D.: Percepcija i informacija, Nolit, Beograd, 1988; Boring, Edwin, G., A History of Experimental Psychology, Appleton - Century - Crofts, Inc., New York, 1942; Goldstein, E. B.: Sensation
and Perception. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Pacific Grove, 1996; Kora, : Razvoj psihologije
opaanja, Nolit, Beograd, 1985; Vudvort, R: Eksperimentalna psihologija, Nauna knjiga, Beograd,
1964; Zarevski, P: Psihologija pamenja i uenja, Naklada "Slap2 ,Zagreb, 2002; Gvozdenovi, V:
"Rano vienje i vizuelna panja", Psihologija, Vol.36 (3),241-254; Keler, V: Getalt psihologija, Nolit,
Beograd, 1981; Koler : Dinamics in psychology, Liveright, New York, 1940; Kofka, K: Principles of
Gestalt Psychology, Harcourt New York, 1935;
5. Canter, D.; Psihology and the Built Environment, Architectural press, Tonbridge, 1974; isti, The
Psihology of Place, The Architectural Press ltd, London, 1977; Haberer,G : Die architektonische Gestalt, Buchhandlung Walther Konig, Koln, 1986; Kurtovi Foli, N.,O mogunostima vrednovanja
fasada, ZRG, Beograd, 1986, str. 28-33; Hesselgren, S : On Architecture, Studentliteratur, Lund,1987;
Lawson, B: The Language of Space, Oxford, Architectural Press, 2001. S.Holl &J.Pallasmaa& A.PerezGomez, Question of Perception, WSB, San Francisko, 2006; Alihodi, R, Definisanje primarnih
aspekata psiholokog doivljaja arhitektonskog prostora i forme", Ulcinj, Plima, 2007, Alihodzic, R.,
Opaanje i pamenje arhitektonskog prostora i forme, doktorska disertacija, Univerzitet u Novom Sadu,
2009, (neobjavljeno)
120
R. ALIHODI, N. KURTOVI-FOLI
6. D. O'Meara, J., Pythagoras revived: Mathematics and philosophy in late antiquity, New York, 1990;
Aristotel, O dui, Zagreb, 1996, Aristotel, O pjesnikom umijeu, (prev.Z.Dukat), Skolska knjiga, Zagreb,
2005, Ladan, T., Sabrana djela (Prijevodi) Aristotel, Ovidije, Medicinska knjiga, Zagreb 2001
7. Tatarkjevic, V., Istorija 6 pojmova, Nolit, Beograd
8. Vitruvije, M.P., Deset knjiga o arhitekturi, Gradjevinska knjiga, Beograd.
9. Alberti, L.B., The Ten Books of Architecture, The 1755 Leoni Edition, Dover Publ.,
10. Ch. Nicholl, Leonardo da Vinci, The Flights of the Mind, Penguin Books, London, 2005, 141-142.
11. Kemp, M., Leonardo da Vinci: The Marvellous Works of Nature and Man, 2006. Visit Amazon's Martin
Kemp Page
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
Are you an author? Learn about Author Central
12. A. Riegl, Stilfragen: Grundlegungen zu einer Geschichte der Ornamentik, 1891 i1893.
13. H. Wlfflin, Prolegomena zu einer Psychologie der Architektur, 1886, i Renaissance und Barock, Eine
Untersuchung ber Wesen und Entstehung des Barockstils in Italien, 1888.
14. Schmarsow, A., Grundbegriffe der Kunstwissenschaft, 1905
15. K.Linc, Slika jednog grada, Gradjevinska knjiga, Beograd, 1974.
16. A.Rosi, Arhitektura grada, Gradjevinska knjiga, Beograd, 1991.
17. R. Arnhajm, Umjetnost i vizuelno opaanje, Univerzitet umetnosti, Beograd, 1978; Vizuelno miljenje,
Univerzitet umetnosti, Beograd, 1985; Dinamika arhitektonske forme, Univerzitet umetnosti, Beograd,
1990; Mo centra, SKC, Beograd, 1998; Prilog psihologiji umetnosti, Book War, Beograd, 2003.
18. ulc, K.N., Intentions in Architecture, Architectural Press, Oxford, 2000; Akerman, J., Origins, Imitation,
Conventions, Representation in the Visual Arts, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 2001; Langer, S., Feeling and
Form, New York, 1953; Bruno, Z., Kako gledati arhitekturu, SKC, Beograd; A. Hildebrand: Problem forme
u likovnoj umetnosti, Univerzitet umetnosti, Beograd.
FACTA UNIVERSITATIS
Series: Architecture and Civil Engineering Vol. 7, No 2, 2009, pp. 121 - 133
DOI: 10.2298/FUACE0801009V
Ljiljana Vukajlov
University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technical Sciences
Department of Architecture and Urbanism, Serbia
E-mail:
Abstract. Due to the emergence of a new way of shaping settlement space, process
when the basic characteristics of the traditionally formed blocks are lost, an idea about
searching the role of the urban and rural block in forming the structure and the
identity of a settlement is initiated.1 The basic aim of the research is to prove that the
block has always been an integral part, and sometimes even inseparable part of a
settlement structure, its recognizable element and a significant place of neighboring,
and that due to this it is important to preserve its values in future interventions in
settlements. In order to understand the cause for the disappearance of the traditional
block, its characteristics have been researched in the settlements from the past and the
interdependence between the forms of settlements and the blocks has been established.
Key words: Settlements, urban block, rural block, interdependence, morphology
1. INTRODUCTION
Block existed in most of the settlements built in different historical periods on all
continents. It had special significance in the ancient world, because it represented a
module in planning and organizing settlements, also in the Renaissance, when it was an
inseparable part of towns. During all historical periods block represented also the
community of the people who were mutually connected within the block, in different ways
(in terms of religion, race, class). During the 20th century, one of whose characteristics are
broken connections with the past in all areas of life and negation of tradition, there was a
change of attitude towards forming and shaping space, and at the same time towards the
basic elements of the settlement structure. Because of that, the basic characteristics of the
122
LJ. VUKAJLOV
block were changed. Its disappearance was observed as well. At the end of the 20th
century blocks in older parts of settlements were radically reconstructed, due to this the
identity of these areas was changed. The physical transformations of a block also caused
new social conditions and contacts among people. Neighboring units started to disappear,
and people became more and more alienated from each other.
Block is "an area of inhabited territory, determined for building, or already built,
limited by streets, square, park, river bank, etc." [1] or some other areas. Most commonly
it is a group of buildings, houses, or a combination of both, and there are cases that the
whole block is one house (unit block) [2]. It has been proven that the history of mankind
is connected to the appearance and development of settlements, and therefore data on
settlements can be traced back to the appearance of the first organized human
communities. By researching settlements from the earliest times, until nowadays, the
development of the rural and urban block can be followed as well. Block as an element of
settlement structure existed in all periods, ancient times, Middle Ages, and modern age.
Some of its characteristics which have survived during several thousands of years,
remained even nowadays, and are of great importance for determining not only the
significance of block for forming the structure and identity of settlements, but also for the
future interventions within blocks and settlements.
2. REVIEW OF FORMING OF BLOCK THROUGH SHAPES SIGNIFICANT
FOR THE HISTORY OF SETTLEMENTS
The first habitats where people satisfied only their basic existential needs are
forerunners of rural settlements [3]. The rural settlements were formed on naturally
suitable locations with favorable climatic conditions, near water and fertile soil, or on
natural elevations, even on inaccessible and hidden places far away from roads. Smaller
settlements were formed of only few buildings, freely located and grouped in space. In
prehistoric settlements Glastonbury in England (Fig. 1) or Skara Brae in Scotland (Fig. 2)
blocks did not even exist.
Historical Review of the Interdependence of Settlements and Urban and Rural Blocks
123
Block regularity of the structure existed as early as in the prehistoric period.2 The
structural regularity of the settlements on wooden piles above marshland was the
consequence of the structural system of platforms on which those settlements were
created, as well as a consequence of efficiency in using its surface area (Fig. 3) [4].
Nowadays, there are also similar settlements on wooden piles, such as Zanvie, a village in
Benin in Africa (Fig. 4). The concentration and efficiency of using land have always been
the basic characteristics of village settlements.
Fig. 4 Today's village settlement Zanvie in Benin in Africa, formed above the lake
Urban settlements were formed later that rural ones, as a consequence of religious needs,
appearance of handicrafts, surplus of products and the need for exchange of goods. That is
why they were most frequently formed in places of special spiritual energy, near roads, at
their intersections, at the river banks or sea shores. Chatal Huyuk (atal Hyk) is a settlement considered to be the first town (Fig. 5).3 It was formed 6,500 BC in today's Turkey,
soon after the appearance of agriculture. Most probably there were 6,000 inhabitants. It is
the best example of a settlement in which people exchanged fruits from the surrounding area
for goods from other areas [5]. The houses were built of bricks and earth, and were placed
next to each other. There were no doors, but the entrance was through an opening on the
roof, because it was safer that way (Fig. 6). Through those only openings smoke went out.
There were no walls surrounding the settlement. Since the buildings were positioned next to
each other, flat roofs were used as streets. Inside the buildings the walls were painted, and
people slept on platforms. The dead were buried inside the buildings as well.
2
Although the prehistoric "block" does not fit into the definition of contemporary blocks, great similarities are
noted between their basic characteristics.
3
The Chatal Hyk settlement was discovered by James Melaart in 1958, and in 1961. its excavation started.
124
LJ. VUKAJLOV
Some rural settlements eventually developed into urban settlements such as Ur. Town
settlements often were very specific and unique in various aspects, that is why it is more
difficult to compare them than village settlements. However, by considering settlements
from different perspectives, taking into consideration the historical moment of their
creation, process of development, the cause of their decline and disappearance, as well as
their people needs, it is possible to understand their relevance and the characteristics of all
of their elements.4
3. MORPHOLOGICAL DEPENDENCE OF SETTLEMENTS AND BLOCKS
By systematization of settlements according to the shape of the base of the settlements
and blocks (Table 1) great diversity was noted, and a simple division, not only of the settlements but also of the blocks, in two basic categories, regular and irregular was made.
The shape of the base of the settlement is the consequence of many factors, and in this
paper the significance of physical shape of a block, one of the most important element of
the settlement structure, is specially emphasized.
Regular shapes of settlement bases are always the consequence of regularly organized
street networks and shapes of blocks, and irregular shapes of settlements are either consequence of irregular shapes of blocks or they are conditioned by natural specific characteristics (moved relief, presence of curved water surface, bigger terrain incline and the
similar).
Professor at the Faculty of Architecture in Belgrade, architect Jovan Nekovi, in his lectures in subject
Architecture of the Past, emphasized that "if we observe buildings as objects we see nothing. We should
observe people and their needs. The plans are not only drawings, there is life coming out of them."
Historical Review of the Interdependence of Settlements and Urban and Rural Blocks
125
Table 1. Systematization of the analyzed settlements according to the shape of settlements and blocks
Settlement
Babylon
Regularity
of block
base
regular
Shape
of block
base
trapezoidal
Korsabad
regular
square
regular
square
square
regular
very longated
rectangular
Kahun
regular
rectangular
regular
rectangular
Timgad
regular
square
regular
square
Mompazje
regular
rectangular
regular
rectangular
Elblong
regular
rectangular
regular
Palmanova
regular
regular
Brasilia
regular
Milet
irregular
star-like,
nonagonal
bent,
stripe-like
dissected
elongated
rectangular
polygonal
Athens
irregular
heart-shaped
irregular
bent,
rectangular
rectangular,
almost square
pentagonal
Priene
irregular
fan-shaped
regular
rectangular
San
Gimignano
Carcassonne
irregular
finger-like
irregular
pentagonal
irregular
elliptical
irregular
semicircular
Avignon
irregular
elliptical
irregular
complex
Orvietto
irregular
elliptical
irregular
pentagonal
Dubrovnik
irregular
rectangular
regular
rectangular
Manchester
irregular
rectangular
regular
very elongated
rectangular
a part of
New York
Redbarn
irregular
dissected
regular
rectangular
irregular
dissected
irregular
amorphous
Welwyn
irregular
dissected
irregular
amorphousamor
fni
regular
regular
Block
base
126
LJ. VUKAJLOV
Regularity of the shapes of the settlements' base and blocks is a consequence of the
way the settlements were created. Those settlements that were formed as complete in a
very short period, were most frequently built from the outer borders, walls towards the
centre, in which process blocks of regular shapes were most commonly formed, and the
settlements which were continually formed, during a longer period of time, were spreading from the center towards the outskirts of the settlements, and the blocks were most frequently of irregular shape. There are settlements which were formed within regularly positioned walls, and the blocks are of regular shapes. There are also settlements which were
created by multiplication of regularly shaped blocks; therefore the regular bases of the
settlements were formed. Thus, it can be concluded that the regularity of blocks was the
consequence of the settlement organization, but also the regularity of blocks influenced
the regularity of the shape of the settlements' bases. The square block shape (Fig. 8) is
noted in Roman military fortifications, castra, whose bases are of regular shapes, such as
in Timgad in Africa (Fig. 7) or in Korsabad (Table 1). All of the blocks are of the same
shape and size.
Within the Workers settlement (Fig. 9), of a square base, which was built near Akhetaton (Akhetaton around 1350 BC, today Tel el Amarn), elongated rectangular blocks
were formed only for staff builders residential (Fig. 10).
Rectangular shape of settlements and blocks existed also in Babylon (2,500 BC.), Kahun (2,500 BC), Mompazje (Figures 11 and 12), Elblong (1237), Brasilia (1960) (Figures
27 and 28) and Manchester (79). The specific characteristics of Mompazje that the
rectangular block (Fig. 12), whose shape originated in the shape and size of the building
lot, was used as a module in forming of the settlement (Fig. 11). Trapezoidal, hexagon or
"L" (Fig. 14) shapes of blocks are the consequence of forming regular star-like, nonagonal shape of the base of Palmanova and characteristic shaped defense system (1593) (Fig.
13). The specific shapes of blocks in Palmanova were necessary elements for forming
streets and squares, and at the same time inseparable part of the town completeness.
Historical Review of the Interdependence of Settlements and Urban and Rural Blocks
127
Fig. 9 Square shape of the base of Fig. 10 Rectangular shape of the base of residential
Workers settlement near
block in Workers settlement near Akhetaton
Akhetaton (2500 BC.)
Irregular shape of the settlement has not always been the consequence of block irregularity,
but also it depended on the specific natural surroundings. Thus, for example, Milet (479 BC)
128
LJ. VUKAJLOV
(Fig. 15), which is organized with the regular blocks (Fig. 16), has irregular shape of the base
due to jagged shore. The similar examples are also Priene (300 BC), Dubrovnik (7th century)
(Figures 17 and 18) and New York (1625) (Figures 19 and 20).
Historical Review of the Interdependence of Settlements and Urban and Rural Blocks
129
Although the natural conditions greatly influenced the location of settlements and its
design, the influence of rulers must not be neglected. Already, several rulers in Babylon
continuously built and edit a city on the banks of the Euphrates. Nebuchadnezzar had
built Ishtarian gate, rebuilt the Etamenan temple and built Semiramis' hanging gardens
(one of the Seven Wonders of the World) [6].
One of the most significant factors of forming, organizing and developing town settlements
was traffic. The development of traffic caused "reduction" of distances between settlements,
thus the settlements became more closely connected, but also it influenced the spreading of existing settlements, thus they became larger and larger (e.g.. New York). Some new settlements
(e.g. Brasilia) were built over large areas, which could be easily travelled owing to complex and
developed traffic systems. Specific shapes and sizes of blocks were formed as the consequence
of traffic networks. Irregular shapes of blocks exist in irregularly shaped settlements, and they
were formed as the consequence of irregular street networks, for example in Athens (702)
(Figures 21 and 22), San Gimignano (12th century), Avignon (12th century) (Figures 23 and 24),
Carcassonne (13th century), Orvietto (13th century), Welwyn (1920) (Figures 25 and 26) and
Redbarn (1929).
Fig. 23 Irregularity of the base shape of Fig. 24 Irregular shape of blocks in Avignon
(2008, satellite picture)
Avignon from the 12th century
(2008 satellite picture)
130
LJ. VUKAJLOV
Orthogonal street network in Korsabad, Workers settlement near Akhetaton (Fig. 9),
Babylon, Kahun, Mompazier (Fig. 11), Milet (Fig. 15), Priene, Dubrovnik (Fig. 17), Elblong
and Brasilia (Fig. 27) caused forming of regular block shapes, most commonly rectangular.
This block shape proved to be most suitable not only for spatial organization and block
division, but also for forming the settlements' structure. The regular block shapes were most
frequently of the same or similar dimensions, regardless of urban disposition within the
settlement. Although the blocks often were formed as the consequence of forming street networks, in some settlements they were used as module for forming and planning of settlements
as well. Thus there are typical blocks in Milet (Fig. 16), Priene, Elblong and New York (Fig.
20). Trapezoidal, hexagonal or complex block shapes in Palmanova, were formed as the
consequence of regularly organized shapes of the settlement base, they were inseparable parts
of the town, significant not only for the settlement organization but as well for street and square
(Figures 13 and 14).
From the very beginning of settlements, different needs of people caused forming of
public and private spaces. The purpose of most blocks in settlements was residential, and
only a small number of blocks were used for other purposes. The central blocks, as well
as the blocks next to the main street or close to the centre, were specific, more significant
than others and stood out from the surrounding residential part, not only for its purpose
but for its morphology. Specific blocks or buildings in them represented also significant
elements of the settlement identity. However, the most important landmarks in settlements
were not the blocks but individual objects. Accentuation of structures in space was used
in order to stress the importance of functions, show prestige, owner's wealth or stressing
religious domination. Urban settlement structure clearly showed hierarchical organization
of society, and caused certain way of living.
Historical Review of the Interdependence of Settlements and Urban and Rural Blocks
131
rials of bad quality, unlike the temples, one part of which surviving until today. The fact
that residential buildings of the most of ancient town and village settlements were not preserved, confirms that they were built of lower quality materials, and that their owners
were poor people.
In the 18th century, when the industrial settlements were formed, parts of the settlements
became separated because of the ecological conditions [7]. During the 19th century a specific attitude towards all life spheres was developing, and it was based on the influence of
economic rules. Due to that, towns were viewed as products so the town land was used to
the utmost. As a consequence of settlement planning based on economy, the surface of
settlements grows enormously, blocks were completely built and very tall buildings were
built in the central areas [8]. Free surfaces in blocks were more and more used for building, spaces within the blocks became darker and darker and less and less ventilated. Close
building led to appearance of blocks with only one building whose dimensions were the
same as the dimensions of the block. The central blocks were getting more and more different purposes, so they were more functional than surrounding blocks and residential
outskirts. Free settlement development encouraged also "liberation of human personality,
individuality and subjectivism, as a basis for human anatomy, independence from all
family, national, racial constrains [9]."
This led to significant ideas regarding block organization and settlement planning, and to
reconstruction of already existing parts of settlements. The development of towns in 20th
century was greatly influenced by technical and technological achievements in the field of
constructive systems, building materials and traffic. By criticizing inherited industrial and
capitalistic towns, it is suggested to improve the towns by moving residential areas far from
the industrial parts and heavy traffic. By aspiring to improve hygienic and functional conditions of living for people, freestanding buildings surrounded by green areas are built far
away from the traffic and where non built areas are safe for children playing. However,
spaces within blocks become inseparable part of traffic surface, and in the same time not safe
enough. "Opening" of blocks led to block destruction, and to other settlement elements.
132
LJ. VUKAJLOV
Zoning is introduced within the towns, division of town territory according to functions, which are mutually connected by heavy traffic. Due to the development of busy
roads neighboring blocks became physically separated and the people living in them as
well. Separation of residential areas from working areas caused less contact among
neighbors in spaces within the blocks. Gradually this caused alienation among people. It
was believed that building new settlements paid off more than reconstructing old ones,
thus new garden and satellite settlements were formed. A lot of attention was paid to separation of inner part of residential blocks from outer traffic. For that reason groups of residential buildings such as in Figure 26 were formed [10]. The private life was priority,
and public and social life was neglected.
4. CONCLUSION
On the basis on the comparative analysis of the structure and identity of settlements
and their blocks from different historical periods, and by observing the ways of their
creation, several conclusions were drawn. Although there is a great diversity of the base
shapes of the settlements and blocks, settlements and blocks can be divided into two categories: regular and irregular (Table 1). The significant interdependence of the shape of
settlement base and blocks within them is noticeable. Regularity of the shape of settlement base is most frequently consequence of the regularity of blocks, but, in some cases,
regularity of blocks is conditioned by the organization of the settlements within their
geometric borders. Irregular shape of settlements is most frequently consequence of the
block irregularity or specific natural surrounding.
It has been noticed and that the shapes of the settlement bases depend on the way of
creation and development of the settlement. In some settlements, block had a function of a
module. When it was, settlement were forming by multiplying blocks, and later continued
with its development, building new blocks. It has been noted that the rectangular shape of
the block is the most represented in the settlements and that was always the most efficient
for land exploitation. Rectangular block shape came from the result of multiplication plots
rectangular shape, and sometimes was the result of organizing orthogonal street network.
Block shapes are mostly a consequence of the street network characteristics. Trapezoidal,
hexagonal or "L" block shapes usually formed due to the result of a need for squares and
streets or as consequence of forming specific shapes of settlement base (eg, ideal cities).
Urban dispositions of blocks in the settlement were extremely important for the organization and implementation of certain functions. It observed that the central blocks are
specific and more significant than other blocks. Most of them are non-residential, unlike
most of other units whose purpose is residential. Urban structure of settlements has always emphasized hierarchical organization of the society and caused certain way of living. The blocks are allocated of the environmental conditions in the settlement, depending
on the location and their purpose. Realizing the difference in the ways of building blocks,
it was concluded that the free way of building the formation of environmentally correct
area, but less secure. Marginal way construction, on the contrary, creates less favorable
environmental conditions, but provides a higher degree of security. Free way to building
more and led to block destruction and the alienation among the people.
Historical Review of the Interdependence of Settlements and Urban and Rural Blocks
133
REFERENCES
1. Maksimovi, B.: Urbanism in Serbia, Graevinska knjiga, Beograd, 1962. p. 119.
2. Gaffuri, J. Trevisan .: Role of Urban Patterns for Building Genarilsation: An Apllication of AGENT,
ICA Workshop on Generalisation and Multiplerepresentation, Leicester, 2004. str.7.
3. Mamford, L.: Town in History, Book, Zemun and Marso, Beograd, 2001. (The First Chapter, p. 6. to 26.)
4. Mili, B.: Town Development through Centuries I, Prehistory antique. kolska knjiga, Zagreb, 1994.
str.29.
5. Mealaart, J.: atal Hyk: A Neolithic Town in Anatolia, London: Thames and Hudson, 1967.
6. http://sr.wikipedia.org/sr-el/%D0%92%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%BD
(septembar 2009.)
7. Maksimovi, B.: Urbanism in Serbia, Graevinska knjiga, Beograd, 1962. p. 24.
8. Kostof, S.: The City Shapped, Thames&Hudson Ltd, London, 1991. str. 122.
9. Supek, R.: Town According to People's measure From the point of view of cultural antropology,
Naprijed, Zagreb, 1987. p. 17.
10. Jellicoe, G. S.: The Landscape of Man, Shaping the Environment from Prehistory to the Present Day,
Thames&Hudson, Ltd, London, 2000. p. 296.
FACTA UNIVERSITATIS
Series: Architecture and Civil Engineering Vol. 7, No 2, 2009, pp. 135 - 144
DOI: 10.2298/FUACE0801025L
1. INTRODUCTION
Industrial development, since the second half of 19th century cause an immense consumption of resources and energy and an increase in the emission of harmful matter in the
environment, generated in the entire production cycle and even by the produced goods
themselves. Consequences of such a treatment of nature lead to the climatic changes
(harmful solar radiation, draughts, acidic rain occurrence, eutrophication, photochemical
formation of ozone, global warming, glacier meltdown etc.) as well as to an increased
emission of poisonous chemicals to air, increased risk of natural disasters etc. The limited
resources of raw materials and energy and increasing demands for energy production and
consumption brought about a rise in usage of renewable energy sources and recycling, on
one hand, and usage of passive energy on the other hand.
Nowadays, the renewable energy sources and materials became relevant factors of
contemporary societies, due to the grave energy and material deficiency. Developed
countries, as opposed to the underdeveloped and developing countries, mostly optimize
and standardize energy and material consumption. It is implemented through systemic and
Received July 15, 2009
136
J. STOJI, D. STANKOVI
legislative arrangements in order to conserve the natural resources. The basic requirements are that production has low energy demands and low levels of harmful matters
emission in production and usage. A special attention in production is paid to recycling
and waste matter disposal, reduction of noise, dust and vibrations. It should be noted that
in civil engineering, during construction and demolition activities, large quantities of
waste material are generated, so there is a growing demand for an increased re-use and recycling of building material, and stringent waste materials control.
Environmental, bioclimatic design, includes all these parameters. Therefore, environmental awareness and energy saving does not rely only on education of population,
but fuses with all the scientific disciplines and becomes a code of conduct of contemporary societies.
XX century as an age of industry and technology, but rapidly changed its character
into an age of information and environment. [7].
The second issue is the constant growth of population and creation of gigantic metropolises. These metropolises are at the same time the highest consumers, not only of
non-renewable sources of energy and raw materials, but limited usable housing. In this
way, in the course of incessant growth of population and the cities, other useful areas are
shrinking, such as arable land, forests etc. By the expansion of cities, industrial zones, illicit settlements and the unplanned expansion of week-end settlements, the problem of
physical reduction of natural resources is generated, that is, of renewal of energy from
nature. Also, during such continuing physical changes, along with a number of harmful
factors, this problem assumes larger proportions, such as disturbance of eco-systems, endangering of plant and animal species and eventually a threat to the humankind.
If we know that the total surface area of the Earth is around seven billion square
kilometers, and that only one fifth is suitable for living, how then organize the limited
planetary surface for the future immense human community? These are the words of
Fabre-Luce in his book "Six billion of insects". Demographic explosion, which double
the population of the Earth every forty years, indicates that in around three hundred
years there will be seven hundred billion people on the Earth. In 2260, there will be only
10 square meters of the Earth surface area per each inhabitant of the planet, and in 2400
only 1 square meter! [2].
Exactly out of this thesis a number of favorable alternative solutions were created with
the aim of provision of living and housing space, which was logically applied by the civil
engineering, carried by the political and social changes. Namely, emergence of high towers,
skyscrapers, even the city-sized buildings, and the entire concept of floor organization in
architecture, in the time of high technical potential were created in the metropolises where
the concentration of the population is the highest, and thus the issue of deficient building
land was solved. However, such structures, apart from the high requirements in structural
and formal sense, from the perspective bioclimatic principles of design are considered
immense energy consumers, regarding the high degree of heat loss through a variety of
apertures on the faade, irrespective of whether that is a housing or public type architecture.
Eventually, when discussing the heat losses, underground architecture demonstrates
considerably better results in terms of sustainability. The advantages of an underground
structures are multiple.
If XX century was a time of high-rise structures, XXI century will be the age of underground construction. [9]
137
Irrefutably, the most representative example of primeval housing are caves, where
mankind sought protection from the severe weather conditions; cold, excessive sunlight,
temperature changes, wind, precipitations etc. The cave examples are presented in the
Fig. 1 and Fig. 2.
Primitive tools, made mostly of stone and wood were used to begin construction of
first man-made structures of primeval habitats. First building materials were stone, wood
and soil. Soil, mixed with water was an excellent flexible materiel, which was later often
used in construction, as a filling, cladding or binder. When the fire was discovered, at the
later date, it brought about revolution in human societies, as well as discovery of new
building materials.
In time, these primeval primitive habitats evolved, together with mankind and its understanding of nature. Human settlement differed mostly because of the topographic and climatic conditions at certain localities accordingly, the level of protection from the weather
conditions differed. "The Hanging Gardens of Babylon", built in 6th century BC, one of the
Seven Wonders of the World (Fig. 3), is an example of the protection form external weather
conditions, which employed a watertight roof, constructed of densely packed reed and thick
shrubbery with natural greenery. The tower was built in receding tiers, and each tier contained exotic plants, which had a protective role, apart from the aesthetic one. It is assumed
that the builders of the time constructed an irrigation system for the variety of plants, using
138
J. STOJI, D. STANKOVI
139
"The sod house was built in 1947 after the model of the sod house that had already
been built in Serbia. The house floor level is 1,5m lower than the surrounding ground
level. The structure had now walls. The hipped roof touches the ground, and roof structure is composed of the ridge board supported by a support with lathes which are on one
end laid on the ground. A layer of reed covers the roof structure, with mud on top, as a
final layer." [8].
Throughout history, along with the development of technology in civil engineering,
the underground architecture developed it variety. There are many examples of underground buildings, such as Egyptian pyramids, catacombs (sanctuaries and burial chambers) from the roman period, underground labyrinths, gunpowder storages from the Ottoman period, tunnels and many other. One might gain considerable knowledge about passive construction techniques from these examples, for instance principles of ventilation,
climatization, heating and insulation, using biodegradable material from renewable energy
sources, primarily from the Sun, water and wind. In Fig. 5 is presented ventilation via a
wall with openings according to the aerodynamic principles, Gourna- Egypt.
As early as 3000 BC Assyrian merchants knew about the air conditioning technique by
evaporation of dispersed water. The palace of king Arzaw from Anatolia, 1200 BC was
heated by warm air. Heating with ventilation, circulation of fresh air was implemented in
Roman construction in Orata, nearby Neapel in 80 BC. Caliph Mahdi's summer residence
in Baghdad was cooled by placing snow into the double walls in 775 AD. Leonardo da
Vinci significantly contributed to the improvement of cooling and ventilation technology
around 1500 by designing a fan powered by water.
In the period since 1700 till 1800 Boyle, Gay-Lussac and Dalton formulated the humid air thermodynamic. The genuine development of air-conditioning occurred after 1850
when ventilation and air-conditioning was widely used in industry, in the environments
with high temperatures, dust, unpleasant smells. In 1870 Karl von Linde designed first
compressor refrigerator. Carrier (precursor of the contemporary air conditioning systems)
designed in Brooklyn the first high-pressure air conditioning system. However, by the development of air conditioning systems, the energy consumption soared. After the energy
crisis of 1973, energy saving in the area of air conditioning was promoted.
Studying the natural models and mimicking the flora and fauna systems and principles,
considerable energy savings and reductions of CO2 emissions could be accomplished.
Thus, the global climate can be unaffected, and at the same time the required comfort,
optimal temperature, air humidity and aeration of the premises can be maintained. A
Swiss biologist M. Lscher conducted a research in 1950 on a model of termite towers
(Fig. 6 and Fig. 7). In that research it was documented that termites constructed a system
for temperature regulation and ventilation inside the tower, and a thermo-syphon model
was made. Different density and specific gravity of cool and warm air provides continuous air exchange and ventilation, and replacement of the stale air inside the tower by the
fresh one.
140
J. STOJI, D. STANKOVI
141
Underground structures, throughout history, were mainly constructed for food storage,
but also for weaponry, requiring minimum of dampness and constant temperature. Specific
conditions required, such as constant temperature, absence of noise, safety, protection from
fire, warfare, were mostly met by underground structures. The principles of cooling via flow
of air over ground water through the tower and air ducts are shown in Fig. 8.
Cooling by air flow through special openings in Othman Katrkud building in Egypt is
presented in Fig. 9.
The first genuine examples of dug-in structures covered by peat soil and green roofs can
be found in old Scandinavian villages, in the cold and damp climate. Such roofs apart from
being insulation were accumulators of heat. Soil, particularly one covered by vegetation, is
slowly cooling and warming up, and the temperature in the building does not drop below
12C in the coldest season of the year, even in the most extreme climatic conditions.
In the recent history, in the time of expansion of innovative materials and cruel architecture of concrete and glass, in the time of industrialization and reckless building aimed
at satisfaction of current aesthetic forms of cities, and neglecting of natural bioclimatic
principles and advantages inherited by the humanity, civil engineering started to realize
the issue of global sustainability of the planet.
There are many examples in housing architecture from autochthonous environments,
in the structures which were created for purely functional but also traditional needs, where
coherence with nature is evident.
This so called "Folk architecture, as anonymous buildings were termed by Victor
Hugo, architecture without architects as termed by Rudofski, architecture without pedigree, that is spontaneous, immediate, popular, vernacular, organic building are all the
names of this particular architecture, which was neglected for so long and from which
one could learn a great deal [6]. Nowadays in XXI century, contemporary architecture is
returning to earlier values..
First "organic architecture", movement was initiated by Le Corbusier and Frank Lloyd
Wright through a philosophy of architectonic forms originating in the organic structures
of villages at the turn of XX century. This idea was pioneering the latter movements such
as green architecture, earth architecture, terratecture, geotecture, passive solar architecture. Green architecture, relationship of nature towards mankind and vice versa, according
to the words and deeds of two leading figures of modern architecture, was focused on reinterpretation of environmental philosophy, and implementation of structures into the nature, becoming a part of it in the process.
The underground structures, partially or completely dug-in are progressively becoming a
trend in global architecture. The most of these structures was built in the USA and Europe.
Motivation for construction of underground structures varies. The most frequent motive
stems from the functional needs, due to the deficiency of valuable densely constructed city
area, for infrastructural needs etc. whereas in the recent period, the motivation is coinciding
with the concept of sustainability and natural resources conservation, as well as with the high
energy efficiency. Spectacular examples of underground structures of XX century and contemporary architecture worldwide become very attractive and significant parameters in the
further progress of city development. Many structures were built deep underground in
densely built-up city cores. Underground architecture is inevitable in consecutive implementation of requisite infrastructure, traffic lines, metro, tunnels and other things such as
shopping centers, galleries, libraries, scientific centers, schools etc.
142
J. STOJI, D. STANKOVI
143
ture is fully integrated with the environment. Through skilful design, the roof mounds
were covered by window panes, which illuminate the interior from the zenith. Savings in
heating and cooling, without additional energy are provided by the controlled ventilation
system. Excess water collected on the "living roof" is drained via siphons and conducted
to the underground water system. The collected precipitation water is later used in the
structure, among other things for heating purposes.
3. CONCLUSION
The data which are daily encumbering human freedom, are in effect, results of inconsiderateness and carelessness of the mankind. All the data continually indicate the inevitable usage of renewable energy from nature.
The priority in such view of the world and architecture is conservation of bio diversity
and ecosystems. Knowledge of limited reserves of fossil oil and pollution of the planet,
are urging for saving the energy and usage of solar energy. Such architectonic philosophy
is a harbinger of a new age in progress and development of architectural forms. Such idea
could be included in plans of reconstructions of existing structures and entire settlements.
Every existing building must be reinvestigated, as the solutions are frequently very different. Underground architecture, apart from a high degree of energy saving, frees up the deficient surface area of the cities, and alleviates functioning at the same location by at various levels. Such construction is paying back in a variety of ways in the long run. Faade
and its maintenance are excluded from the charges, and the soil serving as a thermal insulation is also completely for free.
Underground architecture could, to a certain extent, contribute to architectonic diversity of cities, but also of some future suburban areas. It is special not only for the energy
efficiency, but also for its unique aesthetics. The feeling of freedom, space and pleasure
instead of cramped, closed and same places created by monotonous housing districts is a
privilege of modern man. Organized and planned construction of underground structures
would solve the overpopulation problem in certain areas, and the surface area of agricultural land is increased, agricultural production as well and consequentially, the employment. It is a circle of causes and consequences, where human kind is benefiting the most.
Above all, we must bear in mind that environment affect human psycho-physical health.
The place and environment where we dwell, and work should be "healthy" and humane.
The Capitalism as a system converted people into working machine, which detached itself
from the nature. It is now necessary to raise the awareness of these primordial values,
particularly for the sake of those who will inherit the Earth. Underground architecture is
in one part, small but not insignificant, attempting to reduce the load of the environment,
use the nature without interfering with its laws. The entire state of affairs indicates that
XXI century is the age of sustainable architecture.
REFERENCES
1. G. Jovanovi "Bioklimatsko projektovanje", predavanja na predmetu "Bioklimatsko i ekoloko
projektovanje", GAF Univerziteta u Niu, 2008 god.
2. M. Luki, "Solarna arhitektura", Nauna knjiga, Beograd 1994 god.
3. V. Milkovi "Ekoloke kue", IV izdanje, Novi sad, 1993 god.
4. M. Pucar, "Bioklimatska arhitektura, zastakljeni prostor i pasivni solarni sistemi", Beograd 2006 god.
144
J. STOJI, D. STANKOVI
FACTA UNIVERSITATIS
Series: Architecture and Civil Engineering Vol. 7, No 2, 2009, pp. 145 - 153
DOI: 10.2298/FUACE0801037R
1. INTRODUCTION
Public spaces emerge as obligatory elements of the urban matrix through the whole
development of civil engineering. Through different historical contexts, a series of conditions and particularities of a certain period are being viewed, from social, economical,
scientific, to technical and ethnological and realization to what degree construction of that
particular time responded to needs of society, applying their own shapes or copying elements of past epochs. These spaces "are the greatest artefacts created by the human
hand", and they have numerous and different influences on the mind of the users,
"non-homogeneous mass, which uses urban space in different ways, interprets it differently, experiences its influence in different ways." [5]
Received August 25, 2009
146
The quality of public spaces can be viewed through their morphology, architectural
and urban structure. However, the genuine quality of these spaces is based on their programmes, social, psychological and environmental qualities, which are realized through
mutual interaction between objects that form them.
Relationship between built and open spaces is being researched by Camilo Sitte, who
says that "in modern urban planning, the relationship between built and open space has
been reversed. In the past, open space - streets and squares created a closed and expressive design. Today, the building plots are arranged as regular self-contained shapes and
whatever is left becomes square or street" [1].
There are numerous expert reflections on public spaces, observing them from a viewpoint of their spatial and sociological place on a city map, which, according to Lefebvre
"are always in relationship to society as a whole, with its structure and functions. Changes
of a city begin when society as a whole is changing" [12].
Public spaces in a city have vital role in an urban area. Numerous functions which
they have, services they offer to their consumers, directly affect quality of life. By studying three basic components: character, structure and importance of public spaces, we may
obtain a clear picture of the existing condition of the city. The role of these spaces is not
only to establish the environmental quality, but also the necessary psycho-social relations
in a society.
2. CONSTRUCTION OF CORNER BUILDINGS IN MODERNISM IN "MALI LIMAN" AREA
Modernism, as a movement emerged at the beginning of the twentieth century, and
buildings which were built in this period in the territory of Novi Sad were works of architects educated mainly in the Austro-Hungarian Empire (Vienna, Budapest, Prague),
and because of that, the formative elements applied were in accordance to the standards of
these parts. Architects of Modernism relied on basic geometrical shapes, and on the application of basic principles of shaping, for which the most important theoretical contribution was given by Le Corbusier [8] in his works, and which had immediate influence on
creation of city urban structures. Disappearance of classical urban block with appearance
of new structures - free standing buildings, stands on the opposite side of importance of
corner building construction which at the same time creates accompanying public spaces [7].
However, although architects from Novi Sad followed new tendencies more than architects
of nearby cities of the Pannonian Basin, Modernism was not entirely implemented in
construction. Almost none of the five principles of Modernism, not even "free standing
building in greenery" can be recognized in the Novi Sad area, on the buildings constructed in
the analyzed period. Recognition of a new style appears only through application of
architectural elements on buildings, applied in recognizable manner.
By construction regulation of the city of Novi Sad of 1918, it was determined for
streets to intersect at the right angle in order to give the city a symmetrical shape.[2] The
basic unit was a built-in rental house on the alignment line, and corner built-in houses of
rectangular foundation layouts were situated on the fringes of the blocks. Construction of
"Mali Liman" began in 1992, in accordance to the Regulation plan of 1921, and based on
the design of the architect from Budapest Szilard Zielinski (1860-1924) of 1910, as the
greatest urban project in the history of Novi Sad (the first city-planning of Novi Sad in the
Interrelationship of Public Spaces snd Built-in Corner Buildings Based on the Examples of Modernism 147
Kingdom of SHS.[11] Urbanization of "Mali Liman" formed at the time the most modern
boulevard in the state (former Queen Marija Boulevard, nowadays Mihajlo Pupin Boulevard), with entire grid of modern streets, from Dunavska to Radnicka street. In that way, a
parallel heart, in comparison to old, historical centre, of the modern city was created. At
the same time, the main ground for construction of public buildings and apartment houses
in the period between the two Wars was created as well [9].
148
Interrelationship of Public Spaces snd Built-in Corner Buildings Based on the Examples of Modernism 149
150
Fig. 4 Piazzetta, green open space along Jovana Boskovica Street, Sonje Marinkovic
Street and Mihajla Pupina Boulevard
Communication lines which are represented in the area of "Mali Liman" have contributed to the development of a variety of formations of urban blocks. Irregular shapes of
blocks have conditioned construction of corner buildings, which followed the regulation
line and in that way responded with their form to the street grid. In that regard, three interrelationships of built-in buildings towards the street, boulevard and quay are typical in
analyzed area.
Fig. 5 Built-in corner building which follows street directions at the intersection of Sonje
Marinkovic and Vojvode Misica Streets
Interrelationship of Public Spaces snd Built-in Corner Buildings Based on the Examples of Modernism 151
The typical example of a built-in corner building which follows street directions is
situated at the intersection of Sonje Marinkovic and Vojvode Misica Streets. Represented
buildings on the corner form obtuse or right angles of blocks, and corners themselves are
emphasized by the use of a balcony, which is followed by curved or right lines of buildings themselves. Although by doing this, corner is emphasized, i.e. crossroads of the
streets themselves, the very buildings are asymmetrical and mainly positioned towards the
street where there is entrance. Since all the buildings are of multifamily residential type,
in the sense of functionality, relationship of the street as a public space and building itself
is realized through entrances situated on the dominant side of each building.
Importance of a character and domination of a public space is observed on analyzed
buildings which are situated close to Mihajla Pupina Boulevard and Kej Zrtava Racije.
The corner buildings of the blocks beside these two types of public spaces are residential
buildings and office buildings, which suggests frequent use of public surface and its specific function. In that way the interaction between buildings themselves and public spaces
is emphasized even more, and environmental unity of the built and open space is more
unified. The position of the buildings is especially emphasized by the application of morphological elements of balconies and terraces towards public spaces.
152
5. CONCLUSION
Analyzing interrelationships of public spaces and built-in corner buildings from Modernism in the area of "Mali Liman" in Novi Sad, it can be noticed that direct influence of
urban definition as well as geometry of these buildings derives as a result of the treatment
of an urban block as a whole. With regard to this, interrelationship of buildings and public
spaces are considered as a whole.
The most prominent types of public spaces which appear are square, piazzetta, street,
boulevard, quay and park. Buildings which are situated directly next to these public
spaces, by their function and geometrical structure, in most analyzed cases, have clearly
defined interrelationship with surrounding public spaces. While buildings clearly define
squares, piazzettas and follow the plan of streets, boulevards and quays, public spaces
along with them, improve the whole built structure of urban blocks in "Mali Liman" and
create qualitaty environmental micro-spaces.
Influence on interrelationship of public spaces and corner buildings has internal organization of the space, and therefore it can be concluded that geometry of researched
buildings and application of different morphological elements follow dominant internal
space on the corner of the building itself (appearance of vertical communications or residential units and business offices where two facades meet). With more complex geometry
of corner buildings, difference in floor organization can be noticed, conditioned by the
application of different elements in building shaping itself, with the aim to realize different relationships and position towards dominant public space around the building.
Application of different morphological elements has an important role in establishing
interaction of all above mentioned types of public spaces and built in corner buildings.
Corners of buildings themselves are often shaped by balconies, galleries, and terraces, and
sometimes even more emphasized by addition of flag masts, sculptures, reliefs and similar
morphological elements.
Important point of view and perception is symmetry/asymmetry in shaping corner
buildings. Faades symmetry is present on most buildings which are situated on corners of
traffic arteries of the same importance. In case when a building is at the corner of main
and side street or located towards open public spaces (square, park, piazzetta) geometry
of morphological elements, including faade shaping is always more dominant and more
developed on the "main" faade.
Having in mind that public spaces of a city, formed under the influence of social, economical, political and other imperatives, make a framework around which urban form develops [1], and "in the whole development of architecture corner building is an element
which gives the building its visual stability"[6], it can be concluded that mere varieties of
geometries of corner buildings being analyzed from the period of Modernism in Novi Sad
and interrelationship with surrounding public spaces, have direct influence on the formation of the image of the city and define its spatial, psychological character through numerous social and symbolic values, and indispensable functions of city spaces in scope of
its needs and certain social and cultural contexts.
Interrelationship of Public Spaces snd Built-in Corner Buildings Based on the Examples of Modernism 153
REFERENCES
1. Bentley I.: Urban transformations - power, people and design, Routledge, London, 2002.
2. Graevinska uredba slobodnog kraljevskog grada Novi Sad, 1918, u Biblioteci Matice srpske br.III 7411
3. Hiel K.: Morfoloki elementi motivi arhitekture Novog Sada XX veka, Doktorska disertacija, FTN,
Novi Sad, 2004.
4. IAGNS, Novi Sad, F.150 1739/1935.
5. Irvin K., Postmoderni trg/ plaza, Ulini performans nasuprot gluvarenju u oping centru, Urbani spektakl, Clio, Yustat, Beograd, 2000.
6. Koelj, J.: Tipologija mestne stanovanjske arhitekture in njena sovisnost z morfologija mestnega prostora, Univerzitetna konferenca ZSMS: Knjinica revolucionarne teorije, Ljubljana, 1987.
7. Kubet V., Krklje M., Hiel K. (2008): Geometrija ugaonih objekata Moderne u Novom Sadu, 24th National and 1st International scientific convention moNGeometrija 2008, Vrnjaka Banja, 25-27. septembar 2008., pp. 117- 123
8. Le Korbizje.: Ka pravoj arhitekturi, Graevinska knjiga, Beograd, 1999.
9. Pali, M.: Izgradnja Malog limana, Sveska za istoriju Novog Sada, Tehniki list 6/1930.
10. Stani, D.: Novi Sad - od kue do kue, Zavod za zatitu spomenika kulture grada Novog Sada, Novi
Sad, 2005
11. Stupar D.: Hronologija urbanog razvoja grada Novog Sada do 1941. godine, IAGNS, Novi Sad, 2006.
12. Vujovi, S.: Lefevrova misao o gradu, Poslediplomske studije, kurs-stanovanje, Materijali sveska 35,
Arhitektonski fakultet, Beograd, 1979.
FACTA UNIVERSITATIS
Series: Architecture and Civil Engineering Vol. 7, No 2, 2009, pp. 155 - 159
DOI: 10.2298/FUACE0801051K
Nikola Ceki
University of Nis, The Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Serbia
E-mail:
Abstract. The paper accentuates questions of a different town planning, architectural,
environmental, de facto, an organic approach to planning the rurban agglomerations,
where remodeling of existing physical structures is inevitable. The goal is to build
adequate, normal communities in urban terms, where people will be active daily, make
non-conflicting decisions for a non-deformed urbanization and a more sustainable
state of city-building sprit, for a general, well thought-out repair of rurban matrices. It
is an effort to create a new, restored urbanity in different social-historical-economic
circumstances which excludes the profiteering, immoral, primitive weakness of the
planners, selfish investors and builders.
Key words: Global ecourbarchitectonic, planning, significant social changes
156
N. CEKI
patterns for a different metabolism of the relation of artifact structures in the spaces, for
the ostensibly new technical and instrumental procedures of very quick transition of socialism into capitalism, according to which the future urban life with such socio-economic
situation and with significantly changed socio-economic framework and architecture will
be more fruitful and more beautiful? With 1000, 2000..8000 euros per a square meter!
Regardless of whether it is a residential or office space! This, in the conditions when a
majority of the population is nearing the so called "absolute poverty" threshold one
dollar of income per day per capita! And when all the theories about collective, humane
building, about the reconstructions of urban agglomeration, influences to increase the
awareness of the population, programs about the market planning methods, become ineffective, in an instant.
To acquire urbanity, means to deal with the social-historical-economic continuity, but
with the "transitionists" , who well understood the transition, profit-making time, and who
used it for their own purposes in a most selfish manner, launching terrible lies, which
were "accepted" by the people: "speculators, professional petty politicians, opposition
arm-chaircrats, nationalistic profiteers, prosecuted and non prosecuted criminal characters, profiteers, and all those who used the transitional weaknesses of large urban agglomerations in a most immoral and primitive way possible".
This gallery of freelance transitionists is even more splendid, and it contains the loud
protagonists with half-beliefs, those "halfers", half-regime people, half-believers, halfworkers, do-nothings etc. that is, all those who have nothing in common with town planning and architecture, let alone planning!
I agree with the opinion of the pronounced Belgrade sociologist, Ph. D. Sreten Vujovic, who asserted ten years ago that: "the town planning is a mixture of ideology and
practice under the patronage of the state and the market." Yes, but when there is no rule
of law in the state, and when the economy operates in the gray zone, it is an ideal situation
for the operation of "mafia-managers". In addition, the citizens are always at a loss, because of the non-existing owner, and because of the new clients who impose the illicit
elements, commit criminal acts in the economy, speculate with the real estates, usurp the
public common property and develops new forms of profiteering.
Platitudes about constructing new Europolises, China districts etc. are all deceptions,
in Doxiadian terms: pure crimes!
Urbarchitecture nowadays is a commodity which transforms the world at an incredible
rate, reality and not a fiction which directly affects a number of innumerous, quickly
composed and functionally retailored localities for instance banks, their offices, insurances, doctor's offices, cafs, fast food outlets etc, but not the structures of art, sport and
recreation, stationary traffic, where the public is only the silent observer. Shall I use the
example of the city of Nis, where with an honorable exception of the Puppet theatre, since
1945 till nowadays, no building of a cultural purpose was built? This small fact confirms
how the development of the city and citizens in our country survived tragic discontinuities. Hermetization. Unfortunately, looking back to the recent history, the citizenry has
been too small and impotent to become a factor in significant social changes. Such urbanization was marked by the decisive role of political Party instructions in the organization of relations in space. It is very similar these days: political subjects, public subjects,
entrepreneurs owning private companies and market subjects dictate "new transitional
urbanization of mixed characters" . A question ensues: whose cities are those, where the
157
town planning chaos, observable in the additions on the existing constructions, "kioskmanias" and similar enterprises establish a new semi-suburban, decelarated change in the
planning culture a poorly readable modernization.
When you buy a location, for example for the mega-market companies: TEMPO,
METRO, MERKATOR, IDEA, INTEREX, PRAKTIKER, CORA etc., out of several
tens of thousands of square meters, you have bought the right to remodel a part or to
change a large part of urban agglomerations, you have acquired a permanent access, a fare
for inauguration of a new, moving, creative global urban culture and new Euro-Balkan
behavior, right to a new understanding and interpretation of spatial forms, a new dialog
among people, but also a new dialog of man with walls in the interior and exterior space!
Therefore, not only physical space, but the right to establish new, as a rule, (un)inspired,
invisible mental, philosophic-social-ensnaring-multicultural coordinates which change the
way of life in future decades, establish a new historicity full of grotesque contrasts, very
often opposing, between the old and the new forms, bring the new identity, new offer urbarchitectonic forms of micro and macro localities, a new balance between the natural and
artifact volumes.
In urbarchitecture, it is always dangerous to play with identity! Playing and experimenting with the forms of the houses. We build our identities, constantly and wittingly or
unwittingly, we build ourselves
Their (un)desirable and (un)esthetic not understandable awareness of the space where
it is necessary to preserve tradition, heritage, scenery. You have destroyed the old, "provincial" forms of understanding of the urban space, which were being carefully established for decades, and instead of their concept of sport-and-recreational or another functional areas, a new banal division of urban territories into business zones, new gravitational zones of residence, work, recreation, and totally new conceptual and building
meaning and functional concepts in adjacent, bordering zones etc. The previous urbarchitectonic, environmental philosophy has been comprehensively dimmed, blurred and
annihilated, and a new universal pattern of ideas was established, a globalistic mechanism
which "designs" new phenomenal-centers with the marks of imported identity and an interruption in the historical and cultural city-building context. In my view, the too fast
building smothered the authenticity of micro-localites for the sake of universal, "non-indigenous", limited urbarchitectonic art, and an urban and valuable artistic and scientific
thought has been lost, and the wrong relationship towards tradition and inherited values in
space was chosen, and a new urbarchitectonic vocabulary has become a pronounced issue,
as a new basis of cultural relationship towards the question of architectonic construction
in general.
You have bought yet another thing: a right to a color, scent and taste of the city, a
right to "suffocate" it, right to the tones of its new destiny, impulses, noise, a right to influence its anatomy! Moreover, a right to indirectly affect its environment. All the mentioned occurred for a very short time, as a consequence of the invested capital, which, as
the writer Danilo Kis put it: "is always good at getting the job done".
This dictated "modernism" of the civilized world, pushed forward by the capital is an
extremely dynamic, prominent, turbo-investing commercial offensive, and an investment
egotistical category of participation which most frequently promotes the new unplanned
urbarchitectonic, visual and functional space, and its new "adjusting" scenery, success and
social recognition, "revolutionary" iconography of interpolation of houses among houses,
158
N. CEKI
whose dialog becomes a surprising, boring, inhuman, cold and unattractive. I do not agree
with such cultural insensitivity in urbarchitecture, with heedlessness and a fraud, because
there cannot be an idea of , continuation and establishment of city building continuity, and
where "advocating the modern value of the spirit, new boxlike, pronounced profiteering
market creativity" has the primacy, which when viewed in a long historical span can
rather be considered destruction. This has come under pressure of "market planning,
under the veil of changes in planning culture and an unwholesome politization.
De facto, globalistic dynamized renewed chaos in the space which changes the rate of
change, and promotes positions which significantly change the awareness of the people
and interpolates the new culture of behavior in space, living force of the city and creates
tensions in all the resources, especially energetic, and increases the city maintenance
costs, and which smells totally different and has no relation with tradition, customs, culture and habits of people, and which is a provincial mutiny, Euro-fatum, our new clash
with totally different world where urban poetics fades away and perishes!
A fundamental question is: which urbarchitectonic directions will help us preserve our
heritage and obtain the close future, without consequences? To stop the ever intesifying
process of aggression on the environment, to stop the rhythms of degradation and subdue
the construction of rurban continuum under restrictive control mechanisms, with integral
action plans and with a large scale of interventions.
I do not have an answer to such a planning challenge.
In this urban drama, fat rich people occupy the best central locations, and create for
themselves an "exclusive" architecture very often suffused with kitsch, opposites of art
and with madness, hopeless and neo-utopistic vision of the world, while the desperate
poor masses, which does not have a dime in the pocket, and which will double in the next
ten years, does not even try to think about any planning. Prof. Vujovic's opinion is that it
is a process where a domination of political financial oligarchy will be established, which
will have means and reasons to slow down the social transformation contrary to the publicly proclaimed goals a group which puts up an unseen resistance to any modernization.
In fact, little thought is given to them which are coming and which will very soon
flood the cities and create new multi-million agglomerations. They erect and shore up,
overnight, suburbs and slums, they create traumatic urbarchitectonic mock-models out of
sheer necessity, and do not think about any city planning, culture of planning, the least of
all about the market planning. They are at the bottom of this story, and only trying to put a
roof over their heads and convert their habitat into something which could be called humane, and acceptable and bearable to some extent. In the process of urbarchitectonic
planning, de facto, they are the basis of the cruel scenario, where construction additions,
and similar interventions in space bring about unacceptable, dangerous symbols of our
time new identity of an unstructured living organism, new urbarchitectonic forms
(houses) micro and macrolocalities, deformed functions, unremarkable town planning
physiognomies, mish-mash of social deformity! I do not believe in the potential to improve significantly such aggravated states, into "new town planning" brimming with
busy city life. It is a slow process directly dependent on the patronage of the state, that is,
the market.
Several scores of years were required to create this global chaos, in which we are now.
It will take decades to construct the adequate, more normal communities in terms of town
planning, where people will be active on a daily basis, and make non-conflicting decisions
159
about the non-deformed urbanization and different status of an urbane, city-building spirit
for a general reconstruction of the urban matrix.
It is a slow but manageable process. A process, for which, it is recommendable to first
renew the subject matter of city building planning, where two parallel philosophies one
about town planning, the other about traumatic, brutal anti-urbanism cannot coincide any
more. We will not be able to, nor must we, in the future, have the same attitude towards
the living, urban space, between the constancy of change of ideas and forms if we intend
to improve the status and mend the big deficiencies in the structures of our cities, as prof.
Nikola Dobrovic said.
REFERENCES
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
FACTA UNIVERSITATIS
Series: Architecture and Civil Engineering Vol. 7, No 2, 2009, pp. 161 - 169
DOI: 10.2298/FUACE0801065A
Biljana Arandjelovi
University of Ni, The Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Serbia
E-mail:
Abstract. Berlin is one of the most interesting European cities. In the Cold War period, The
Berlin Wall physically divided West Berlin and East Berlin for 28 years in period from
August 1961 till November 1989. Berlin was also the symbolic boundary between West
countries and Communism during the Cold War, which influenced also the architectural
development in the city. The city was the biggest building site in Europe in the period of
1990s. Today, Berlin is an important art center with around 1500 cultural events daily.
Berlin is also since 2005 the only European UNESCO city of design.
Key words: Modern architecture of Berlin, history of architecture, art in open urban
space, UNESCO city of design, memorials at urban place.
1. INTRODUCTION
Berlin is the city of very turbulent history that was founded in 13th century. Many radical
changes happened to Berlin in the past. Today contemporary Berlin is an important world
metropolis with more than 3.5 million of citizens. The World War II devastation resulted in
complete destruction of the inner city center. After the World War II, Berlin was divided, as
well as the whole Germany. In the year 1948, the eastern sector of Berlin, which was part of
the Soviet sector become the capital of the newly established German Democratic Republic.
The Western part of Berlin was under Allied rule and a part of the Bundesrepublik
Deutschland. Berlin Wall, the symbol of divided Germany, has been built in 1961 and divided Berlin till 1989. The city was re-united in 1990, after collapse of Communism in
Europe, and became again the capital of Germany. In 1990s the construction boom happened to Berlin which lead to attracting the most famous architects of the time to the city. In
the period after 1990 many important modern buildings have been built in Berlin such as
The Reichstag building by Norman Foster in 1999, Jewish Museum by Daniel Libeskind in
1999, German History Museum by I.M.Pei in 2003, Marie-Elisabeth-Lders-Haus and Paul
Lbe Haus by Stephan Braunfels, Potstadamer Platz by Renzo Piano, Richard Rogers, Arata
Isozachi, Helmut Jahn, Rafael Moneo and more.
Received October 10, 2009
162
B. ARANDJELOVI
Fig. 1 Wall Memory in metro station at Brandenburg gate; the newest underground station
has three lines that going from Hauptbahnhof to Brandenburg gate (Berlin main train
station officially opened in 2006 after almost eight years of construction work)
Photograph made by the author 2009
163
164
B. ARANDJELOVI
The new modern buildings, Paul Lbe Haus and Marie Elisabeth Lders Haus, alongside the river Spree has been built after the design of the architect Stephan Braunfels. The
Marie Elisabeth Lders Haus is situated on the eastern bank of the river Spree and together with the Paul Lbe Haus creates a functional and visual unity. Two pedestrian
bridges over the river Spree connect this two buildings. The building Paul Lbe contains
more than 900 offices for the deputies of the German parliament, and is 200m long, 100m
and 22m high. The name of the building Paul Lbe is after the last parliamentary president, until 1933.
Fig. 3 The two left side buildings are divided by the river Spree. At the left river side is
Marie Elisabeth Lders Haus. At the right side is Paul Lbe Haus;
Photographs made by the author 2009
Fig. 4 Detail of memorial could be seen in front of the Bundestag complex. This is one of the
numerous examples how the German government pays respect to the victims of the past;
Photographs made by the author 2009
165
The Memorial to the murdered Jews of Europe stands in the heart of Berlin, just next
to Brandenburg gate in order to send message to all, not only visitors as this is one of the
most visited tourist location in the whole Berlin, but also to be visible to the German
politicians on their way to Reichstag. This monument, open to public day and night as a
place as a remembrance of six million Jewish victims, has been made by the architect
Peter Eisenman. The construction work on the Memorial, consisting of the Filed of 2,711
concrete slabs arranged in grid pattern and the underground memorial center, began in
2003 and ended in 2005. The size of the field of concrete slabs is 19.073m2 with height
that vary from 0-4,7m. Each mounted steale has been made from high performance concrete.
166
B. ARANDJELOVI
Arkaden Shopping Mall by Richard Rogers, a 3D IMAX cinema and Musical Theatre and
Casino.
167
East side gallery, TV tower and Alexander square ate three landmarks of the east Berlin. The East Side Gallery is 1.3 km painted part of former Berlin Wall, along the
Mhlenstrasse in former East Berlin. This is the largest remaining evidence of the past
city division. Today, wall mural with its visual testimony of the spirit of the liberation,
made by various world artist, is one of the main touristic attraction in Berlin. In year 2009
is the 20th anniversary of the Peaceful Revolution and the Fall of the Wall of Berlin.
Fernsehturm (TV tower), with its 365 meter, the highest structure of Berlin topped by
a metal globe is the symbol of the old East German regime. The purpose of its high
structure, which is impossible not to be seen from almost all central parts of the town, was
to remind those in West Berlin that they were surrounded by the East German State.
Alexanderplatz is the main square in the eastern part of Berlin, named to honor Alexander I, Tsar of Russia. In the 1970, Alexanderplatz became a typical socialistic urban
square. The former department store ''Centrum Warenhaus" was the largest department
store in DDR and is transformed nowadays to a modern department store. Important traffic junction with S-Bahn (surface rail network) as well as the underground railway, together with well known buildings such as Hotel Stadt Berlin (123m high hotel), the Haus
des Lehrers (Teachers' House), The House of Travel and the publishing house building
(today Berliner Zeitung) had the aim to make this square competitive with West Berlin.
The architectural future of East Berlin is in further urban development. The positive
urban development is possible only by integrating typical socialistic architecture. These
sky-scrapers from the communistic period are a part of the past. The successful future
could not be built by destroying the leftovers of the past. There are always ways of reconstruction that could bring progress and modernization.
Fig. 8 Fernsehturm
Photographs made by the author 2009
Fig. 9 Alexanderplatz
Photographs made by the author 2009
168
B. ARANDJELOVI
169
4. CONCLUSION
Berlin is the city of diverse architectural styles as the turbulent history has always
been reflected in the architecture. Today Berlin is facing many problems, the same as the
other metropolises. Berlin had learnt a lot form the past. The present shows how past
should never be forgotten. Without understanding of past there is no future.
It could be concluded that Berlin is definitely unique city with rich history, fruitful
present and without no doubt a city with great possibilities for future development.
Thanks to its diversity Berlin is an international cosmopolitan that will always attract
people from all around the world. It is also well known that Berlin gives endless creative
possibilities as the UNESCO city of design. After the Second World War different architectural styles have been developed in the town divided by the Wall. In the year of celebration of 20 years of German reunion after Fall of the Berlin Wall, many questions have
to be raised in Berlin and still a lot of work has to be done in order to make Berlin better.
The biggest treasure that Berlin has is the fact that Berlin is the city of past, present and
future.
REFERENCES
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
New Architecture Berlin 1999-2000" Andreas Gottlieb Hempel, Martin Kieren, Jovis/Deutsches
Architektur Zentrum Berlin, 1999
"Renzo Piano" architecture monograph, Anatxu Zabalbeascoa, Javier Rodriquez Marcos, Editorial
Gustavo Gili, USA, 1988
http://holocaust-mahnmal.de
http:// kalliopilemos.com
http://artdaily.com "Akademie der Kunst will Present an Installation by Kalliopi Lemos in Front of the
Brandenburg Gate" , October 23, 2009
UNESCO city of design http://portal.unesco.org/culture
FACTA UNIVERSITATIS
Series: Architecture and Civil Engineering Vol. 7, No 2, 2009, pp. 171 - 178
DOI: 10.2298/FUACE0801113S
Abstract. Actual vapor pressure (VP) is an important parameter that is used in many
evapotranspiration equations. However, vapor pressure is difficult to measure accurately. In
the humid climate, the actual vapor pressure can be derived from minimum air temperature.
The objectives of this study were: first, to estimate errors that can arise if VP data are not
available and have to be estimated; second, to compare the Priestley-Taylor ET0 values
computed under various levels of VP data availability; and third, to evaluate the reliability of
Priestley-Taylor equation as compared to the FAO-56 Penman-Monteith method. The
following main conclusions can be drawn: Estimated VP values generally were in closest
agreement with measured VP values. The measurements of air humidity at humid locations
are not indispensable for estimating reference evapotranspiration. The Priestley-Taylor method
(with measured or estimated VP) provides the very good agreement with the evapotranspiration
obtained by the FAO-56 Penman-Monteith method except windless locations.
Key words: Vapor pressure, Reference evapotranspiration, FAO-56 Penman-Monteith,
Priestley-Taylor
1. INTRODUCTION
Accurate estimation of evapotranspiration is required for efficient irrigation management.
Evapotranspiration is a complex process because it depends on several weather factors, such as
temperature, radiation, humidity, wind speed and type and growth stage of the crop.
Actual vapor pressure (VP) is an important parameter that is used in many evapotranspiration equations (Trajkovi i Stojni 2004, Trajkovic and Kolakovic 2009). However, vapor
pressure is difficult to measure accurately. Measurements of relative humidity by electronic
sensors are commonly plagued by hysteresis, nonlinearity and calibration errors (Allen 1996).
In the humid climate, the actual vapor pressure can be derived from minimum air temperature
(Tmin) (Jensen et al. 1997; Kimball et al. 1997; Thornthon et al. 2000)
172
S. TRAJKOVI, S. IVKOVI
The objectives of this study were: first, to estimate errors that can arise if VP data are not
available and have to be estimated; second, to compare the Priestley-Taylor ET0 values
computed under various levels of VP data availability; and third, to evaluate the reliability of
Priestley-Taylor equation as compared to the FAO-56 Penman-Monteith method.
2. METHODS AND MATERIALS
2.1. Climatic data
The six humid weather stations selected for this study are located in Serbia. These locations are Palic, Novi Sad, Negotin, Kragujevac, Nis, and Vranje. Temperature, wind
speed, humidity, vapor pressure, and sunshine hours were collected at these stations for
different time periods. Values of these weather parameters were obtained from Federal
Meteorological Service. The description of the different weather stations along with the
observation periods, number of patterns and mean weather data is given in Table 1. These
locations were chosen because: first, they have high quality weather data; second, they
cover all the humid latitudes in Serbia (from 43 oN to 46 oN) and third, they are situated
on the different heights above the sea level.
Table 1. Summary of Weather Station Sites Used in Study
Latitude Altitude Period Patterns Tmax
(oN)
(m)
(oC)
(5)
(4)
(3)
(1)
(2)
(6)
Palic
46.1
102 1977-83
84
15.5
Novi Sad
45.3
86 1981-84
48
16.2
Negotin
44.2
42 1971-74
48
16.3
Kragujevac
44.0
190 1981-84
48
16.4
Nis
43.3
202 1977-84
96
17.0
Vranje
42.6
433 1971-74
48
15.9
Station
Tmin
(oC)
(8)
6.1
6.3
5.9
6.0
6.2
5.7
U2
RH
ET0_pm pET0_pm
(%) (m s-1) (mm d-1) (mm d-1)
(10) (12)
(13)
(14)
74
1.7
2.2
4.4
74
1.9
2.3
4.4
74
1.7
2.3
4.8
75
1.1
2.1
4.2
71
1.0
2.2
4.3
72
1.5
2.3
4.5
Differences in the mean weather data for these locations are not very significant. The
mean annual maximum and minimum temperatures (Tmax and Tmin) for all locations varied
between 15.5 and 17.0 oC and 5.7 and 6.3 oC, respectively, and they were highest at Nis
(1977-84; 17.0 oC) and Novi Sad (1981-84; 6.3 oC), respectively. The mean maximum
and minimum temperatures for peak month (pTmax and pTmin) for these locations ranged
from 26.1 to 28.4 oC and from 14.0 to 15.6 oC, respectively. The mean relative humidity
for the peak month (pRH) varied between 71 and 75% for all locations. The mean annual
wind speed (U2) was the lowest at Nis (1977-84; 1.0 m s-1) and Kragujevac (1981-84; 1.1
m s-1); it varied for all other locations between 1.5 and 1.9 m s-1. The mean annual and
peak monthly estimates by FAO-56 PM method (ET0_pm and pET0_pm) ranged from 2.1 to
2.3 mm day-1 and 4.2 to 4.8 mm day-1, respectively.
2.2. ET0 equations
Allen et al. (1998) defined the reference evapotranspiration (ET0) as "the rate of
evapotranspiration from hypothetical crop with an assumed crop height (0.12 m) and a
173
fixed canopy resistance (70 s m-1) and albedo (0.23) which would closely resemble
evapotranspiration from an extensive surface of green grass cover of uniform height, actively growing, completely shading the ground and not short of water".
The International Commission for Irrigation and Drainage (ICID) and Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) have proposed using the PenmanMonteith method as the standard method for estimating reference evapotranspiration, and
for evaluating other methods (Allen et al. 1994 a, b).
FAO-56 Penman-Monteith (FAO-56 PM) equation is (Allen et al. 1998):
ET0 =
900
U 2 VPD)
T + 273
+ (1 + 0.34 U 2 )
0.408 (R n G ) +
(1)
where ET0 = reference evapotranspiration (mm day-1); = slope of the saturation vapor
pressure function (kPa oC-1); Rn = net radiation (MJ m-2 day-1); G =soil heat flux density (MJ
m-2 day-1); = psychometric constant (kPa oC-1); T = mean air temperature (oC); U2 =
average 24-hour wind speed at 2 meters height (m s-1); VPD = vapor pressure deficit (kPa).
Priestley-Taylor equation is often used to estimate ET0 at the humid locations
(Priestley-Taylor 1972). This equation is of the form:
ET0 =
(R n G )
+
(2)
n
)Ra
N
n
4
4
2.45 10 (0.9 + 0.1) (0.34 0.14 VP ) (Tmax, k Tmin, k )
N
(3)
where: Ra = extraterrestrial radiation (MJ m-2 day-1);VP = actual vapor pressure (kPa);
Tmax, k = maximum air temperature (oK); and Tmin,k = minimum air temperature (oK).
Priestley-Taylor method for estimating ET0 from weather data requires following
weather data: minimum (Tmin) and maximum air temperature (Tmax), sunshine hours (n)
and actual vapor pressure (VP). The actual vapor pressure can be derived from minimum
air temperature (Tmin) according to the following equation:
17.27Tmin
VP = 0.611exp
Tmin + 237.3
(4)
174
S. TRAJKOVI, S. IVKOVI
VP
(kPa)
(2)
peak month
annual
1.611
1.022
peak month
annual
1.685
1.054
peak month
annual
1.720
1.053
peak month
annual
1.647
1.044
peak month
annual
1.567
1.004
peak month
annual
1.517
0.971
VP(Tmin)
VP(Tmin)
(kPa)
/VP
(3)
(4)
Palic (1977-83)
1.702
1.056
1.036
1.014
Novi Sad (1981-84)
1.675
0.994
1.045
0.991
Negotin (1971-74)
1.770
1.029
1.025
0.973
Kragujevac (1981-84)
1.596
0.969
1.002
0.960
Nis (1977-84)
1.621
1.034
1.023
1.019
Vranje (1971-74)
1.602
1.056
0.990
1.020
Rn,tnu
/Rn
(5)
ET0_pm,tnu
/ ET0_pm
(6)
1.009
1.003
0.978
1.001
0.999
0.999
1.001
1.010
1.005
0.996
0.989
1.019
0.995
0.993
1.004
1.012
1.005
1.004
0.992
0.993
1.008
1.005
0.979
0.992
2.0
VP (kPa)
175
Novi Sad
1.5
1.0
VP
VP(Tmin)
0.5
Months
0.0
1
10
11
12
l
2
(ET0 _ pm, i ET0 _ method ,i )
SEE = i =1
l 1
0.5
(5)
where SEE = standard error of estimate (mm day-1); ET0_pm = ET0 estimated by the standard (FAO-56 PM) method (mm day-1); ET0_method = corresponding ET0 estimated by the
comparison method (mm day-1); and l = total number of observations. Standard error of
estimate indicates how well each method estimated reference evapotranspiration over all
months of record.
Priestley-Taylor estimates obtained with measured (ET0_pt) or estimated VP (ET0_pt,tn)
were in fairly well agreement with FAO-56 PM estimates for all stations. These methods
underpredicted mean annual ET0 at all locations except Nis and Kragujevac and overpredicted mean ETo for the peak month at all locations. The highest overestimation for the
peak month was observed at Kragujevac and Nis (13% and 12% respectively). This overestimation may be due to low wind speed at these locations. The highest SEEs were calculated at Kragujevac (0.33 mm day-1 for both methods). The lowest SEEs were found at
Vranje (0.23 mm day-1 for both methods). The mean daily FAO-56 Penman-Monteith
(ET0_pm), and Priestley-Taylor estimates obtained with measured (ET0_pt) or estimated VP
(ET0_pt,tn) for Vranje are plotted in Figure 2. Priestley-Taylor estimates obtained with
measured (ET0_pt) or estimated VP (ET0_pt,tn) paralleled FAO-56 PM ET0 values during
the entire period (1971-74) at Vranje except (for) June and July of 1983. Main reason for
176
S. TRAJKOVI, S. IVKOVI
the overprediction may be due to lower wind speed and lower vapor pressure deficits in
these months. Overall, the Pristley-Taylor method (with measured or estimated VP) was
found to be in very good agreement with FAO-56 PM method in humid locations, making
it the good predictor.
Table 3. Statistical Summary of ET0 Estimates for Six Locations in Serbia
Peak month Mean annual pET0_pt(tn)
(mm day-1) (mm day-1)
/p ET0_pm
(2)
(3)
(4)
Palic (1977-83)
4.62
2.17
1.06
4.66
2.18
1.07
Novi Sad (1981-84)
4.67
2.21
1.07
4.66
2.21
1.07
Negotin (1971-74)
4.97
2.29
1.03
5.00
2.28
1.03
Kragujevac (1981-84)
4.76
2.20
1.13
4.73
2.19
1.13
Nis (1977-84)
4.78
2.27
1.11
4.80
2.28
1.12
Vranje (1971-74)
4.67
2.28
1.04
4.70
2.30
1.05
Method
(1)
ET0_pt
ET0_pt,tn
ET0_pt
ET0_pt,tn
ET0_pt
ET0_pt,tn
ET0_pt
ET0_pt,tn
ET0_pt
ET0_pt,tn
ET0_pt
ET0_pt,tn
5
-1
ET0_pm
ET0_pt
ET0_pt(tn)
/ET0_pm
(5)
SEE
(mm day-1)
(6)
0.98
0.98
0.243
0.254
0.95
0.95
0.321
0.320
0.98
0.98
0.277
0.280
1.05
1.04
0.332
0.329
1.03
1.03
0.305
0.311
0.99
0.99
0.232
0.229
ET0_pt,tn
Vranje
1
1971
1972
1973
1974
177
4. CONCLUSIONS
The following main conclusions can be drawn:
Estimated VP values generally were in closest agreement with measured VP values.
At all locations the very low error in estimating ETo arises by assuming minimum air temperature reaches dew point. The measurements of air humidity at humid locations are not
indispensable for estimating reference evapotranspiration. The Priestley-Taylor method
(with measured or estimated VP) provides the very good agreement with the evapotranspiration obtained by the FAO-56 Penman-Monteith method except windless locations.
The convincing results recommended this method for estimating reference evapotranspiration in humid Serbian locations. The results are of significant practical use because the
Priestley-Taylor method can be used when relative humidity and wind speed data are not
available.
REFERENCES
1. Allen, R. G., Assessing Integity of Weather Data for Reference Evapotranspiration Estimation, J. Irrig.
and Drain. Engrg., ASCE, 122(2), 97-106, 1996.
2. Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M. "Crop Evapotranspiration. Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements." FAO Irrig. Drain. Paper 56, Roma, Italy, 1998.
3. Allen, R. G., Smith, M., Perrier, A., and Pereira, L. S., An Update for the Definition of Reference
Evapotranspiration, ICID Bulletin, ICID, 43(2), 1-34, 1994.
4. Allen, R. G., Smith, M., Perrier, A., and Pereira, L. S., An Update for the Calculation of Reference
Evapotranspiration, ICID Bulletin, ICID, 43(2), 35-92, 1994.
5. Jensen, D. T., Hargreaves, G. H., Temesgen, B., and Allen, R. G., Computation of ETo Under Nonideal
Conditions, J. Irrig. and Drain. Engrg., ASCE, 123(5), 394-400, 1997.
6. Kimball, J. S., Running, S. W., and Nemani, R., An improved method for estimating surface humidity
from daily minimum temperature, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 85(1-2), 87-98, 1997.
7. Priestley, C.H.B., and Taylor, R.J., On the assessment of the surface heat flux and evaporation using
large scale parameters, Mon. Weath. Rev. 100, 108-119, 1972.
8. Thomton, P. E., Hasenauer, H., and White, M. A., Simultaneous estimationof daily solar radiation and
humidity from observed temperature and precipitation: an application over complex terrain in Austria,
Agric. and For. Meteor., 104(4), 255-271, 2000.
9. Trajkovi, S., Stojni, V., Estimacija referentne evapotranspiracije evaporacionim metodama, Zbornik radova Gradjevinskog fakulteta u Niu 20, 189-196, 2004.
10. Trajkovic, S. and Kolakovic, S. "Wind-adjusted Turc equation for estimating reference evapotranspiration." Hydrology Research, 40(1), doi: 10.2166/ nh.2008.002, 2009.
178
S. TRAJKOVI, S. IVKOVI
PT metode u poredjenju sa standardnom FAO-56 PM metodom. Sledei glavni zakljuci se mogu izvesti
iz ovog istraivanja: Sraunate VP vrednosti su, generalno, veoma bliske merenim VP vrednostima.
Merenja relativne vlanosti nisu neophodna za proraun referentne evapotranspiracije u humidnoj klimi
Srbije. PT metoda obezbedjuje veoma dobro slaganje sa FAO-56 PM metodom izuzev lokacija sa malom
brzinom vetra.
Kljune rei: Pritisak vodene pare, Referentna evapotranspiracija, FAO-56 Penman-Monteith,
Priestley-Taylor
Contents
Rifat Alihodi, Nadja Kurtovi-Foli
PHENOMENON OF PERCEIVING AND MEMORIZING HISTORICAL BUILDINGS AND SITES.... 107
Ljiljana Vukajlov
HISTORICAL REVIEW OF THE INTERDEPENDENCE OF SETTLEMENTS AND URBAN
AND RURAL BLOCKS ................................................................................................................................ 121
Nikola Ceki
NEW GLOBAL ECOURBARCHITECTONIC APPROACH TO PLANNING ............................................ 155
Biljana Arandjelovi
BERLIN BETWEEN PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE.............................................................................. 161
FACTA UNIVERSITATIS
UNIVERSITY OF NI