Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 14 October 2008
Received in revised form 7 May 2009
Accepted 21 May 2009
Keywords:
Lignocellulosic materials
Lignin
Enzymatic digestibility
Cellulase
a b s t r a c t
The enzymatic saccharication of three different feedstocks, rice straw, bagasse and silvergrass, which had
been pretreated with different dilute acid concentrations, was studied to verify how enzymatic saccharication was affected by the lignin composition of the raw materials. There was a quantitatively inverse
correlation between lignin content and enzymatic digestibility after pretreatment with 1%, 2% and 4%
sulfuric acid. The lignin accounted for about 18.821.8% of pretreated rice straw, which was less than
the 23.126.5% of pretreated bagasse and the 21.524.1% of pretreated silvergrass. The maximum glucose
yield achieved, under an enzyme loading 6.5 FPU g1 DM for 72 h, was close to 0.8 g glucose/g glucan from
the enzymatic hydrolysis of the pretreated rice straw; this was twice that from bagasse and silvergrass. A
decrease in initial rate of glucose production was observed in all cases when the raw materials underwent
enzymatic saccharication with 4% sulfuric acid pretreatment. It is suggested that the higher acid concentration led to an inhibition of -glucosidase activity. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy
further indicated the chemical properties of the rice straw and silvergrass become more hydrophilic after
pretreatment using 2% of sulfuric acid, but the pretreated bagasse tended to become more hydrophobic.
The hydrophilic nature of the pretreated solid residues may increase the inhibitive effects of lignin on the
cellulase and this could become very important for raw materials such as silvergrass that contain more
lignin.
2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The Institute of Nuclear Energy Research (INER), a governmental
organization of Taiwan, is being supported to develop lignocellulosic ethanol production technology from local raw materials.
Agricultural wastes that are abundant in Taiwan, such as rice straw
and bagasse, were preferentially chosen as feedstocks. In addition,
in order to reduce the production costs of lignocellulosic ethanol,
the development of energy crops as feedstocks is also considered
essential. Thus, short-rotation perennial herbs, one example being
silvergrass, are believed to have potential as a raw material for
ethanol production.
The performance of lignocellulosic biomass-to-ethanol processes greatly depends upon the characteristics of feedstocks and
conversion technology including pretreatment, enzymatic saccharication and fermentation. Particularly, the operational integration
of pretreatment and enzymatic saccharication for the different
feedstocks is a crucial issue that may enhance the production ef-
studies have indicated that dilute acid pretreatment seems to redistribute the chemical structure of lignin and this might be expected
to have a signicant inhibition on hydrolytic rate [8,9]. In reality,
the enzymatic saccharication of lignocellulosic materials is a very
complicated reaction and this is due both to the heterogeneous
structure of raw material and to the presence of non-glycans such
as lignin.
The study of enzymatic saccharication for lignocellulosic materials has been extensively carried out, and most of this research has
concentrated on evaluating the enzymatic digestibility of specic
feedstocks that have undergone various pretreatment technologies
[1013]. Less attention has been paid to investigating the effects of
the structural features of the various feedstocks on enzymatic saccharication [1416]. Notwithstanding this, even research in this
area has seldom examined the enzymatic digestibility of raw materials pretreated with a range of sulfuric acid concentrations.
Rice straw, bagasse and silvergrass are quite different externally and also in terms of their structure and in terms of their
chemical constituent. Moreover, these raw materials, which are
considered typical biomass materials, are found widely in Asia. The
objective of this study was the characterization of the enzymatic
saccharication of these three feedstocks, which have different
lignin compositions. These feedstocks were studied using pretreatment with various concentrations of sulfuric acid. Fourier transform
infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy was used to characterize the changes
to the chemical structure when these feedstocks were pretreated.
The effect of the structural features of the various pretreated solid
residues on enzymatic digestibility was also examined.
2. Materials and methods
81
ing incubator using 100 rpm and 2% dry matter (DM). Especially for the enzymatic
hydrolysis test of pretreated solid residue with 4% sulfuric acid, the 10N NaOH was
extra used to adjust the pH of reaction mixtures to the value as mentioned above.
The enzyme loading was set at 6.5 FPU g1 DM and used a commercial cellulase,
namely Spezyme CP (from Genencor International, USA) with a lter paper activity
of 60 FPU ml1 . The enzymatic hydrolysis experiments were performed at a constant
temperature of 50 C for 72 h; then samples from enzymatic saccharication were
taken at regular intervals and underwent sugar analysis.
2.4. Analysis
All samples were ltered through a 0.45 m lter and diluted appropriately with
eluent (4 mM H2 SO4 ). The quantitative analysis for the various sugars was performed
at 45 C using an HPLC system (Agilent 1200 series, Agilent Technologies) equipped
with a refractive index detector. The separation involved a polystyrene-sulfonic acid
column (Coregel-87H3 column with a length of 30 cm and an inner diameter 7.8 mm,
Transgenomic Technologies) at 65 C with 4 mM H2 SO4 as the eluent at a ow rate
of 1.0 ml min1 .
The constituent of raw materials and pretreated materials was determined by
a standard analysis procedure of biomass composition, which was modied by the
National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) analytic methods [17]. The sugar content was determined based on monomer content measured after a two-step acid
hydrolysis procedure. The samples were treated with 72% (w/w) H2 SO4 at 30 C for
2 h in rst step. The reaction mixture was then diluted to 4% (w/w) H2 SO4 and autoclaved at 121 C for 1 h. The hydrolysis solution was ltered and analyzed for sugar
content and acetyl content by HPLC as described above and for acid soluble lignin
(ASL) from absorbance at 240 nm. The remaining solid residue was dried overnight
at 105 C and further placed in the mufe furnace at 575 25 C for least 24 6 h.
The weight of ash was recorded and used to calculate the content of acid insoluble
lignin (AIL).
In addition, FTIR analysis was performed on both the original feedstock before
pretreatment and the pretreated solid residue after acid hydrolysis with 2% sulfuric
acid. All solid samples were dried and then pressed into a disc with KBr. The discs
used in this work were thin enough to obey the BeerLambert law. Infrared spectra
were obtained using a BIO-RAD FTS-40 (Bio-Rad Laboratories, US) FTIR spectrometer
with a resolution of 0.5 cm1 in the range of 400 cm1 and 4000 cm1 .
Table 1
Chemical constituent of the raw materials and pretreated solid residues.
Constituent
Bagasse
Silvergrass
Original
1%
2%
4%
Original
1%
2%
4%
Original
1%
2%
4%
Glucose
Xylose
Arabinose
Acetyl groups
34.6
21.3
3.8
1.1
45.8
7.5
0.1
47.9
4.2
a
50.7
2.5
40.7
23.6
4.1
2.7
56.9
7.2
0.5
59.0
4.5
61.9
3.2
37.4
23.5
3.5
2.0
53.7
7.5
56.7
4.5
57.6
2.3
Lignin
Acid insoluble lignin
Acid soluble lignin
13.0
9.6
3.4
18.8
13.8
5.0
19.3
15.2
4.4
21.8
17.7
4.1
18.8
10.7
8.1
23.7
19.3
4.4
23.1
18.8
4.3
26.5
22.9
3.6
18.6
7.4
11.2
21.5
16.1
5.3
21.7
16.7
5.0
24.1
19.7
4.4
Ash
14.5
13.1
14.4
13.0
8.2
9.0
8.0
2.5
4.3
3.7
3.5
3.6
Not detected.
82
Fig. 1. Time-course for glucose yield during enzymatic saccharication of (A) rice
straw; (B) bagasse; (C) silvergrass pretreated with various concentrations of sulfuric
acid () 1%; () 2%; () 4%.
acid soluble lignin were released for bagasse and silvergrass after
pretreatment. The lignin component of raw materials ought to play
a signicant role in the enzymatic saccharication performance
[18]. It implicated that the diversity of lignin composition in pretreated solid residues may affect enzymatic digestibility in addition
to pretreatment conditions employed.
3.2. Enzymatic digestibility
Sugar yields are often used as an indicator to measure the performance of enzymatic saccharication when lignocellulosic material
is used. Fig. 1 shows the variation of glucose yield from the enzymatic saccharication of rice straw, bagasse and silvergrass using
the different pretreatment severity conditions. The glucose yield
was determined by the ratio of the amount of glucose released during enzymatic saccharication relative to the potential maximum
for glucose, which was estimated from a glucan content of each
pretreated solid residues. The severity conditions for the dilute acid
pretreatment were 1%, 2% and 4% sulfuric acid (w/w) at 130 C with
a 15 min of reaction time.
83
comparable with that for sugar yield relative to each other, this suggests that enzymatic digestibility was mainly determined by initial
rate of sugar released.
The hydrolytic reaction initially occurs due to cellulase attack
on the cellulose surface. Thus, initial rate of sugar released was
probably determined by the number of enzyme attacking sites
for susceptible glucan in the pretreated solid residues. Fig. 3(B)
indicates that the yield in terms of the release of xylose by xylan
hydrolysis using rice straw was slightly increased from 0.71 to 0.75 g
xylose/g xylan when the sulfuric acid concentration was increased
from 1% to 2% during pretreatment. For the dilute acid pretreatment
of bagasse and silvergrass, the yield from the conversion of xylan
to xylose was generally in the range of 0.600.67 g xylose/g xylan
under the same pretreatment conditions. The removal of xylan may
result in greater exposure of the cellulose structure and thus an
increase in the fraction of susceptible glucan. This may diminish
unproductive interactions between the enzyme and the inert fraction of the pretreated solid residues. The enhancement in the initial
rate of cellobiose released for rice straw and bagasse suggests that
this may be due to the increased number of enzyme attacking sites
in solid residues when the sulfuric acid concentration is increased
84
Fig. 4. Relationship between lignin content in pretreated rice straw (, ); bagasse
(, ); silvergrass (, ) and initial sugar-release rates for cellobiose (open symbols)
and glucose (close symbols) during enzymatic saccharication.
Fig. 5. The variation in cellobiose released rate (A), and glucose-release rate (B) during the process of enzymatic saccharication of the various raw materials pretreated
with 2% of sulfuric acid (relative value for initial of sugar-release rate was set to 1.0).
85
Table 2
The relative absorbance of the various bands due to the presence of the different chemical groups in the original feedstocks and the pretreated solid residues.
Group
Band
Relative adsorption
Rice straw
Bagasse
Silvergrass
Original
Pretreated
OH
3300
1.233
1.285
1.043
1.143
1.040
0.901
Phenolic OH
Phenolic OH
1ry OH
2nd OH
1375
1325
1044
1220
1.000
0.991
1.150
0.952
0.968
1.197
1.007
1.003
1.107
0.937
0.966
0.819
0.976
1.016
1.000
1.134
1.015
1.040
1.163
1.105
1.047
1.039
1.039
0.925
1.050
1.081
0.842
0.980
0.975
1.016
0.697
0.880
0.880
0.977
0.871
0.904
0.996
1.014
0.797
0.869
0.899
0.937
0.764
0.802
0.976
1.024
0.820
0.843
0.951
1.000
0.953
0.859
0.946
0.875
0.892
0.904
Mean value
Methoxy-OCH3
2835
2950
1460
1425
Mean value
Original
Pretreated
Original
Pretreated
EtherO
1120
1.166
1.285
1.107
1.106
1.134
1.196
EstersO CO
1150
1250
1.125
1.063
1.242
1.143
1.079
1.049
1.074
0.977
1.086
1.054
1.204
1.082
1.118
1.224
1.078
1.053
1.091
1.160
1.125
0.933
0.898
0.713
0.821
0.987
1.008
0.849
0.742
0.741
1.007
0.992
0.860
0.820
0.860
1.030
0.811
0.998
0.777
1.000
0.847
1.000
1.000
0.855
0.767
1.000
0.679
0.985
1.000
0.903
0.842
1.000
0.787
0.984
1.000
0.866
0.820
1.000
0.885
0.952
0.815
0.963
0.876
0.950
0.902
Mean value
Ketone C O
Aldehyde C O
Carboxyl acid HOC O
1650
1720
1710
Meanvalue
CH vibration of aromatic ring
Mean value
1600
1500
834
86
References
[1] Mosier N, Wyman C, Dale B, Elander R, Lee YY, Holtzapple M, et al. Features of
promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour
Technol 2005;96:67386.
[2] Ruiz E, Cara C, Manzanares P, Ballesteros M, Castro E. Evaluation of steam
explosion pre-treatment for enzymatic hydrolysis of sunower stalks. Enzyme
Microb Technol 2008;42:1606.
[3] Thompson DN, Chen HC. Comparison of pretreatment methods on the basis of
available surface area. Bioresour Technol 1992;39:15563.
[4] Zhang Y-HP, Lynd LR. Toward an aggregated understanding of enzymatic
hydrolysis of cellulose: noncomplexed cellulase systems. Biotechnol Bioeng
2004;88:797824.
[5] Chang VS, Holtzapple MT. Fundamental factors affecting biomass enzymatic
reactivity. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2000;8486:537.
[6] Berlin A, Balakshin M, Gilkes N, Kadla J. Inhibition of cellulase, xylanase
and -glucosidase activities by softwood lignin preparations. J Biotechnol
2006;125:198209.
[7] Jrgensen H, Kristensen JB, Felby C. Enzymatic conversion of lignocellulose
into fermentable sugars: challenges and opportunities. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref
2007;1:11934.
[8] Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, van Zyl WH, Pretorius IS. Microbial cellulose utilization:
fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2002;66:50677.
[9] Yang B, Wyman CE. Effect of xylan and lignin removal by batch and owthrough
pretreatment on the enzymatic digestibility of corn stover cellulose. Biotechnol
Bioeng 2004;86:8898.
[10] Ewanick SM, Bura R, Saddler JN. Acid-catalyzed steam pretreatment of lodgepole pine and subsequent enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation to ethanol.
Biotechnol Bioeng 2007;98:73746.
[11] Kabel MA, Bos G, Zeevalking J, Voragen AGJ, Schols HA. Effect of pretreatment
severity on xylan solubility and enzymatic breakdown of the remaining cellulose from wheat straw. Bioresour Technol 2007;98:203442.
[12] Rosgaard L, Pedersen S, Meyer AS. Comparison of different pretreatment
strategies for enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat and barley straw. Appl Biochem
Biotechnol 2007;143:28496.
[13] Silverstein RA, Chen Y, Sharma-Shivappa RR, Boyette MD, Osborne J. A comparison of chemical pretreatment methods for improving saccharication of cotton
stalks. Bioresour Technol 2007;98:300011.
[14] Jin S, Chen H. Structural properties and enzymatic hydrolysis of rice straw.
Process Biochem 2006;41:12614.
[15] Kim S, Holtzapple MT. Effect of structural features on enzyme digestibility of
corn stover. Bioresour Technol 2006;97:58391.
[16] Zhu L, ODwyer JP, Chang VS, Granda CB. Structural features affecting biomass
enzymatic digestibility. Bioresour Technol 2008;99:381728.
[17] Wen-Hua C, Wen-Heng C, Cheng-Chien L, Wen-Song H. Compositional analysis
of biomass feedstocks. Institute of Nuclear Energy Research Technical Report
(INER-4349R), Taiwan; 2006.
[18] hgren K, Bura R, Saddler J, Zacchi G. Effect of hemicellulose and lignin removal
on enzymatic hydrolysis of steam pretreated corn stover. Bioresour Technol
2007;98:250310.
[19] Palonen H. Role of lignin in the enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose. Finland:
VTT Publication; 2004.
[20] Selig MJ, Viamajala S, Decker SR, Tucker MP, Himmel ME, Vinzant TB. Deposition
of lignin droplets produced during dilute acid pretreatment of maize stems
retards enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Biotechnol Prog 2007;23:13339.
[21] Shengying J, Hongzhang C. Structural properties and enzymatic hydrolysis of
rice straw. Process Biochem 2006;41:12614.
[22] QiuZhuo Z, WeiMin C. Enzymatic hydrolysis of alkali-pretreated rice strae by
Trichoderma reesei ZM4-F3. Biomass Bioenergy 2008;32:11305.
[23] Hideno A, Inoue H, Tsukahra K, Fujimoto S, Minowa T, Inoue S, et al. Wet disk
milling pretreatment without sulfuric acid for enzymatic hydrolysis of rice
straw. Bioresour Technol 2009;100:270611.
[24] Adsul MG, Ghule JE, Shaikh H, Singh R, Bastawde KB, Gokhale DV, et al.
Enzymatic hydrolysis of delignied bagasse polysaccharides. Carbohydr Polym
2005;62:610.
[25] Xue-bing Z, Lei W, De-hua L. Effect of several factors on peracetic acid pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse for enzymatic hydrolysis. J Chem Technol Biotechnol
2007;82:111521.
[26] Ke-Ke C, Jian-An Z, Wen-Xiang P, Jing-Ping G, Yu-Jie Z, Hong-Zhi L, et al. Sugarcane bagasse mild alkaline/oxidative pretreatment for ethanol production by
alkaline recycle process. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2008;151:4350.
[27] Martn C, Klinke HB, Thomsen AB. Wet oxidation as a pretreatment method for
enhancing the enzymatic convertibility of sugarcane bagasse. Enzyme Microb
Technol 2007;40:42632.
[28] Xuebing Z, Feng P, Keke C, Dehua L. Enhancement of the enzymatic digestibility
of sugarcane bagasse by alkaliperacetic acid pretreatment. Enzyme Microb
Technol 2009;44:1723.
[29] Gia-Luen G, Wei-Hsi C, Wen-Heng C, Lee-Chung M, Wen-Song H. Characterization of dilute acid pretreatment of silvergrass for ethanol production. Bioresour
Technol 2008;99:604653.
[30] Makoto Y, Yuan L, Satoshi U, Kensuke K, Yusuke U, Hitomi I, et al. Effects
of cellulose crystallinity, hemicellulose, and lignin on the enzymatic hydrolysis of Miscanths sinensis to monosaccharides. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem
2008;72:80510.
[31] Nada MA, Yousef MA, Shaffei KA, Salah AM. Infrared spectroscopy of some
treated lignins. Polym Degrad Stabil 1998;62:15763.
87
[35] Anderson WF, Akin DE. Structural and chemical properties of grass lignocelluloses related to conversion for biofuels. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol
2008;35:35566.
C, Labidi J, Echeverria JM, Mondragon I. Physico-chemical char[36] Tejado A, Pena
acterization of lignins from different sources for use in phenol-formaldehyde
resin synthesis. Bioresour Technol 2007;98:165563.